BETA

Procedure completed



2015/2274(INI) EU strategy towards Iran after the nuclear agreement
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET HOWITT Richard (S&D) BROK Elmar (EPP), TANNOCK Charles (ECR), SCHAAKE Marietje (ALDE), SAKORAFA Sofia (GUE/NGL), BUCHNER Klaus (Verts/ALE), CASTALDO Fabio Massimo (EFD), SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc (ENF)
Opinion INTA SCHAAKE Marietje (ALDE)
Lead committee dossier: AFET/8/04816
Legal Basis RoP 052

Activites

  • 2016/10/25 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    • T8-0402/2016 summary
  • 2016/10/24 Debate in Parliament
  • 2016/10/12 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • A8-0286/2016 summary
  • 2016/10/06 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • #3457
  • 2016/03/14 Council Meeting
  • 2015/10/29 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
532 2015/2274(INI)
2016/05/26 INTA 57 amendments...
source: 583.926
2016/08/10 AFET 254 amendments...
source: 587.421
2016/08/22 AFET 221 amendments...
source: 587.437

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: BROK Elmar group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje group: GUE/NGL name: SAKORAFA Sofia group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2015-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3457 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3457*&MEET_DATE=14/03/2016 type: Debate in Council title: 3457 council: Foreign Affairs date: 2016-03-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2016-10-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: BROK Elmar group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje group: GUE/NGL name: SAKORAFA Sofia group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2015-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
  • date: 2016-10-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0286&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0286/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0402 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0402/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2015-06-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HOWITT Richard group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2015-06-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2015-12-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHAAKE Marietje group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2015-12-01T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Foreign Affairs meeting_id: 3457 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3457*&MEET_DATE=14/03/2016 date: 2016-03-14T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.178 title: PE584.178 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.110&secondRef=02 title: PE582.110 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-08-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE587.421 title: PE587.421 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-08-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE587.437 title: PE587.437 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3457*&MEET_DATE=14/03/2016 title: 3457
  • date: 2016-10-06T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-10-12T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0286&language=EN title: A8-0286/2016 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Richard HOWITT (S&D, UK) on the EU strategy towards Iran after the nuclear agreement. The report noted that following the Iran Nuclear Deal and internal political developments in Iran, there is now an opportunity for reforms in the country and for improvement of its relations with the European Union. Members stressed that all sides are now responsible for ensuring its strict and full implementation. Political dialogue : the report recalled that the Council’s decision to lift all nuclear-related sanctions against Iran as a result of implementation of its commitments under the Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action (Iran nuclear deal) allows a reengagement with Iran and will create opportunities and benefits for both sides, by providing the potential to reopen the Iranian market for European businesses. It is pointed out that the development of EU-Iran relations should advance hand in hand with the implementation of the nuclear agreement. Under the terms of the agreement a failure in its implementation by Iran can lead to the reintroduction of sanctions . The report welcomed the institutional changes made within the European External Action Service (EEAS) to reflect the results of the nuclear agreement, in particular the establishment of an Iran Task Force in the EEAS with the objective of coordinating the different strands of action of all Iran-related issues and the establishment of an EU Delegation in Tehran. Members called for an EU strategy for re-engagement with Iran to be based, initially, on confidence-building measures in technical areas that would create positive precedents of EU-Iranian joint work and could pave the way for more meaningful long-term cooperation. As regards the death penalty, they emphasised that the abolition of the death penalty is a key objective of EU human rights and foreign policy and called for an immediate moratorium on the carrying out of death sentences in Iran. The report also called for EU-Iran cooperation in the fight against the illegal drug trade as one way of addressing the issue of executions in the country. Trade and economic matters : the report noted Iran’s stated objective of achieving a yearly growth rate of 8 % and that European investments are key to Iran’s achieving this goal. For Iran to realise its economic potential, it will have to take steps to create a transparent economic environment conducive to international investment and take anti-corruption measures at all levels, particularly regarding compliance with the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) addressing questions such as the cessation of financial flows to terrorist organisations. The EU should fully support Iran’s efforts in this process. The report highlighted that although many contracts have been signed with European firms, Iran is unable to honour its commitments because of a lack of liquidity, meaning that the process of opening up Iran is caught in a vicious circle. Members stressed that the lifting of the nuclear-related economic and financial sanctions by the EU and the international community is an important element in demonstrating that the EU has implemented its commitments towards Iran. Sectoral cooperation : noting that Iran has the second-largest gas reserves in the world and the fourth-largest oil reserves, Members stated that energy cooperation can play a significant role in diversifying the sources of energy supply to the EU and reducing Member States' energy dependency on single suppliers, thereby contributing to the EU’s energy security. Lifting economic sanctions has the potential to unlock significant spending on the oil and gas industry as well as other sectors of the economy, which would benefit from investment and access to new technology. European companies are called upon to invest in the Iranian energy sector. The report noted that nuclear energy might not be competitive in Iran because of low reserves of uranium and the cost of extracting it. Therefore, they called on the Commission to explore the potential for civilian nuclear cooperation with Iran and to encourage Iran to sign the Convention on Nuclear Safety. As regards conflicts in the Middle East, North Africa and the Gulf region, Members welcomed Iran’s engagement in the Syrian peace talks via its participation in the International Syria Support Group (ISSG). Members welcomed Iran’s contribution to the fight against ISIS/Da’esh, including its early support for the Kurdish Regional Government in Erbil, and recognises its decisive contribution in Iraq, which halted ISIS/Da'esh's advance and recovered territories that had been subject to jihadist terrorism. Socio-economic issues, rule of law, democracy and human rights : Iran is called upon to enlarge the space for political pluralism. It is also called upon to release of all political prisoners and to free imprisoned EU citizens who have been detained or convicted under a judicial process that did not meet international standards. The Iranian authorities are urged to ensure that the rights of religious and ethnic minorities are fully respected and protected in law and that religious freedom is extended. Lastly, the EEAS and the Commission are called upon to work together with the Iranian authorities in areas such as judicial reform and reform of the prison system, including prison conditions, government accountability, respect for the rule of law, freedom of speech, citizens’ universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the fight against corruption.
  • date: 2016-10-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27633&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0402 title: T8-0402/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 456 votes to 174, with 67 abstentions, a resolution on the EU strategy towards Iran after the nuclear agreement. The resolution noted that following the Iran Nuclear Deal and internal political developments in Iran, there is now an opportunity for reforms in the country and for improvement of its relations with the European Union. Members stressed that all sides are now responsible for ensuring its strict and full implementation. Political dialogue : Parliament recalled that the Council’s decision to lift all nuclear-related sanctions against Iran as a result of implementation of its commitments under the Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action (Iran nuclear deal) allows a reengagement with Iran and will create opportunities and benefits for both sides, by providing the potential to reopen the Iranian market for European businesses. It is pointed out that the development of EU-Iran relations should advance hand in hand with the implementation of the nuclear agreement . Under the terms of the agreement a failure in its implementation by Iran can lead to the reintroduction of sanctions . Parliament: called for EU-Iran relations to be developed through multi-layered dialogue involving political, diplomatic, economic, academic, technical, and people-to-people contacts that include civil society actors, NGOs and human rights defenders; welcomed the institutional changes made within the European External Action Service (EEAS) to reflect the results of the nuclear agreement, in particular the establishment of an Iran Task Force as well as the steps taken by the EEAS for the establishment of an EU Delegation in Tehran; called for an EU strategy for re-engagement with Iran to be based, initially, on confidence-building measures in technical areas that would create positive precedents of EU-Iranian joint work; insisted on the importance of developing the parliamentary dimension of EU-Iran relations as part of the strategy for re-establishing mutual trust. As regards the death penalty, Parliament emphasised that the abolition of the death penalty is a key objective of EU human rights and foreign policy and called for an immediate moratorium on the carrying out of death sentences in Iran. It also called for EU-Iran cooperation in the fight against the illegal drug trade as one way of addressing the issue of executions in the country. Trade and economic matters : Parliament welcomed the Welcomes the positive results already achieved by the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), such as the 43 % increase in trade between Iran and the EU during the first six months of 2016, compared with the same period of 2015. Members noted that Iran’s stated objective of achieving a yearly growth rate of 8 % and that European investments are key to Iran’s achieving this goal. More than USD 1 trillion of investment in infrastructure is likely to be needed over the next 10 years, providing opportunities for European businesses. For Iran to realise its economic potential, it will have to take steps to create a transparent economic environment conducive to international investment and take anti-corruption measures at all levels, particularly regarding compliance with the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) addressing questions such as the cessation of financial flows to terrorist organisations. The EU should fully support Iran’s efforts in this process. Parliament supported Iran’s bid to join the WTO . It called on the Commission to explore options for strengthening trade and investment ties with the aim of bringing Iran more closely into line with WTO rules and protecting European investment. Members stressed that the lifting of the nuclear-related economic and financial sanctions by the EU and the international community is an important element in demonstrating that the EU has implemented its commitments towards Iran. The resolution recalled the legal uncertainty that US primary sanctions and the fact that transactions are conducted in dollars create for EU businesses willing to invest in Iran, which is undermining the delivery of expected economic benefits from the JCPOA to the Iranian people. Sectoral cooperation : noting that Iran has the second-largest gas reserves in the world and the fourth-largest oil reserves, Parliament stated that energy cooperation can play a significant role in diversifying the sources of energy supply to the EU and reducing Member States' energy dependency on single suppliers, thereby contributing to the EU’s energy security. Members are convinced that lifting economic sanctions has the potential to unlock significant spending on the oil and gas industry as well as other sectors of the economy, which would benefit from investment and access to new technology. They therefore called on European companies to invest in the Iranian energy sector . Parliament noted that nuclear energy might not be competitive in Iran because of low reserves of uranium and the cost of extracting it. Therefore, they called on the Commission to explore the potential for civilian nuclear cooperation with Iran and to encourage Iran to sign the Convention on Nuclear Safety. Regional security : Parliament stated that the nuclear deal opens the possibility for cooperation in resolving the region’s security crisis and that Iran should play a stabilisation role in the region . It also considered that EU-Iran cooperation in countering terrorism and violent extremism in the region to be an important part of the political dialogue. As regards conflicts in the Middle East, North Africa and the Gulf region , Members welcomed Iran’s engagement in the Syrian peace talks via its participation in the International Syria Support Group (ISSG). Members welcomed Iran’s contribution to the fight against ISIS/Da’esh , including its early support for the Kurdish Regional Government in Erbil, and recognises its decisive contribution in Iraq, which halted ISIS/Da'esh's advance and recovered territories that had been subject to jihadist terrorism. Socio-economic issues, rule of law, democracy and human rights : Iran is called upon to enlarge the space for political pluralism and to cooperate fully with all UN human rights mechanisms. It is also called upon to release of all political prisoners and to free imprisoned EU citizens who have been detained or convicted under a judicial process that did not meet international standards. The Iranian authorities are urged to ensure that the rights of religious and ethnic minorities are fully respected and protected in law and that religious freedom is extended. Lastly, the EEAS and the Commission are called upon to work together with the Iranian authorities in areas such as judicial reform and reform of the prison system, including prison conditions, government accountability, respect for the rule of law, freedom of speech, citizens’ universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the fight against corruption.
  • date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/04816
    New
    • AFET/8/04816
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.40.05.06 Relations with the countries of the Middle East
    New
    6.40.05.06
    Relations with the countries of the Middle East
    activities/3
    date
    2016-10-12T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0286&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0286/2016
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    activities/4/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/5/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0402 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0402/2016
    activities/5/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/2
    date
    2016-10-06T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/4
    date
    2016-10-25T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
    Old
    51d21272b819f23b5b000006
    New
    4f1ac695b819f25efd00004d
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/name
    Old
    PLENKOVIĆ Andrej
    New
    BROK Elmar
    committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
    Old
    51d21272b819f23b5b000006
    New
    4f1ac695b819f25efd00004d
    committees/0/shadows/0/name
    Old
    PLENKOVIĆ Andrej
    New
    BROK Elmar
    activities/2/date
    Old
    2016-09-12T00:00:00
    New
    2016-10-24T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows
    • group: EPP name: PLENKOVIĆ Andrej
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
    • group: GUE/NGL name: SAKORAFA Sofia
    • group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    • group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc
    committees/0/shadows
    • group: EPP name: PLENKOVIĆ Andrej
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
    • group: GUE/NGL name: SAKORAFA Sofia
    • group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    • group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc
    activities/0/committees/1/date
    Old
    2015-11-30T00:00:00
    New
    2015-12-01T00:00:00
    committees/1/date
    Old
    2015-11-30T00:00:00
    New
    2015-12-01T00:00:00
    activities/2
    date
    2016-09-12T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/1
    body
    CSL
    meeting_id
    3457
    docs
    url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3457*&MEET_DATE=14/03/2016 type: Debate in Council title: 3457
    council
    Foreign Affairs
    date
    2016-03-14T00:00:00
    type
    Council Meeting
    activities/0/committees/1/date
    2015-11-30T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
    committees/1/date
    2015-11-30T00:00:00
    committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
    activities
    • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-06-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: HOWITT Richard
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/04816
      geographical_area
      Iran
      reference
      2015/2274(INI)
      title
      EU strategy towards Iran after the nuclear agreement
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6.40.05.06 Relations with the countries of the Middle East