Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | VAN ORDEN Geoffrey ( ECR) | ZDROJEWSKI Bogdan Andrzej ( PPE), PARGNEAUX Gilles ( S&D), NART Javier ( ALDE), VALERO Bodil ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | VÄYRYNEN Paavo ( ALDE) | Nirj DEVA ( ECR), Arne LIETZ ( S&D), Sabine LÖSING ( GUE/NGL), Joachim ZELLER ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 491 votes 110 with 73 abstentions, a resolution on Peace Support Operations – EU engagement with the UN and the African Union.
Parliament recalled that Peace Support Operations (PSOs) are a form of crisis response, normally in support of an internationally recognised organisation such as the UN or the African Union (AU), with a UN mandate, and designed to prevent armed conflict, restore, maintain or build peace, enforce peace agreements and tackle the complex emergencies and challenges posed by failing or weak states. The aim of PSOs is also to help create stable, secure and more prosperous environments for the longer term.
Parliament also stressed that the security landscape in Africa in particular has changed dramatically in the last decade, with the emergence of terrorist and insurgent groups in Somalia, Nigeria, and the Sahel-Sahara region, and with peace enforcement and counter-terrorism operations becoming the rule rather than the exception in many areas. In this context, it considered that coordinated external actions that make use of diplomatic, security and development tools are necessary to restore confidence and tackle the challenges of wars, internal conflicts, insecurity, fragility and transition.
The deployment of multiple UN-authorised missions in the same theatre of operations, with different actors and regional organisations, is increasingly the reality of modern peace operations. However, managing these complex partnerships, while not duplicating work or missions, is essential to successful operations. In this regard, Parliament called for the evaluation and rationalisation of the existing structures .
Better coordination : Parliament urged the EU, given the scale of the challenges and the complex involvement of other organisations and nations, to seek an appropriate division of labour and to focus on where it can best add value. It considered that UN and AU missions are in need of a comprehensive approach under which, in addition to deploying military, diplomatic and development instruments, other essential factors are a thorough knowledge of the security environment, exchanges of intelligence and information and modern technologies. It stressed the importance of the other instruments of the EU in the security field and, in particular, of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions and operations.
Provision of military forces: Parliament noted that the perceived legitimacy of a PSO is key to its success. It believed that the AU should therefore contribute with support and military forces wherever possible . It welcomed the UN-EU Strategic Partnership on Peacekeeping and Crisis Management and called on the EU to make further efforts to facilitate Member State contributions. It recalled that the EU has engaged in crisis-management activities in Africa. However, only 11 of the 28 EU Member States made pledges at the 28 September 2015 Leaders’ Summit on Peacekeeping, while China pledged a standby force of 8 000 and Colombia 5 000 troops. Accordingly, Parliament called on the EU Member States to significantly increase their military and police contributions to UN peacekeeping missions.
Prevention of conflicts : recalling the need for a rapid African response to crisis, the resolution emphasised the importance of investing more in conflict prevention. It recognised the critical contribution of the African Peace Facility in developing the triangular partnership between the UN, the EU and the AU, but considered it vital that the EU institutions and Member States remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully utilised. It took the view that the Facility should focus on structural support rather than just bankrolling African forces' pay.
Military assistance for African states : Members observed that stepping up European military cooperation would increase the efficiency and effectiveness of Europe's contribution to UN peace missions. They called on the EU and its Member States, as well as on other members of the international community, to assist with training , including discipline, equipment, logistical support, financial assistance and development of rules of engagement, to encourage and assist the African Standby Force .
European missions in Africa : Parliament noted the importance of Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for Africa’s security, in particular training and support missions for African forces, and especially EUTM Mali, EUCAP Sahel Mali and EUCAP Sahel Niger, EUTM Somalia, and EUCAP Nestor. It called on the EU to step up the capabilities of those training missions, in particular by allowing African soldiers who have been trained to be monitored on and after their return from theatres of operations.
Parliament also considered that the Official Development Assistance (ODA) needs to be redesigned under the OECD framework through peace building lenses. Similarly, the EDF regulation should be reviewed in order to allow programming design that includes peace, security and justice expenditures.
Parliament insisted that neither the EU nor the Member States, in supporting PSOs, should act in isolation but that they should, rather, take full account of the contributions of other international actors, improve coordination with them, improve rapidity of response , and focus their efforts on certain priority countries.
Member States’ contributions to the UN system : Parliament noted that the European countries and the EU itself are major contributors to the UN system, and that France, Germany and the UK are the largest European contributors to the budget for UN Peacekeeping Operations. It recalled that the EU Member States are collectively the largest contributor to the UN’s peacekeeping budget, with about 37 %, and are currently contributing troops to nine peacekeeping missions (in 2014 and 2015 EU financial commitments to the AU totalled EUR 717.9 million. It indicated, however, that France, for example, trains 25 000 African soldiers each year and separately deploys over 4 000 personnel in African peacekeeping operations.
Targeted funds : Parliament recognised that the problem is often not the lack of funding but, rather, how funds are spent and what other resources are utilised. It backed initiatives such as the Békou trust fund operating in the Central African Republic. It believed the current funding programme is unsustainable, and that conditions should be attached to the African Peace Facility in order to encourage the AU to increase its own contributions to PSOs.
A holistic EU approach : Parliament supported a holistic EU approach, which is the main instrument for mobilising the full potential of EU action in the context of peacekeeping operations and the stabilisation process, as well as for mobilising various ways to support the development of AU countries. It stressed that border management assistance should be a priority for EU engagement in Africa.
Sexual abuse by United Nations personnel : lastly, Parliament took note of the UN Evaluation Report of 15 May 2015 on sexual exploitation and abuse by United Nations personnel. It considered that the AU, the UN, the EU and Member States should exercise strong vigilance concerning such criminal matters and urged the most rigorous disciplinary and judicial procedures and the utmost effort to prevent such crimes.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Geoffrey VAN ORDEN (ECR, UK) on Peace Support Operations – EU engagement with the UN and the African Union.
The Committee on Development, exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure , also gave its opinion on the report.
Members recalled that Peace Support Operations (PSOs) are a form of crisis response, normally in support of an internationally recognised organisation such as the UN or the African Union (AU), with a UN mandate, and designed to prevent armed conflict, restore, maintain or build peace, enforce peace agreements and tackle the complex emergencies and challenges posed by failing or weak states. The aim of PSOs is also to help create stable, secure and more prosperous environments for the longer term.
The committee also stressed that the security landscape in Africa in particular has changed dramatically in the last decade, with the emergence of terrorist and insurgent groups in Somalia, Nigeria, and the Sahel-Sahara region, and with peace enforcement and counter-terrorism operations becoming the rule rather than the exception in many areas. In this context, Members considered that coordinated external actions that make use of diplomatic, security and development tools are necessary to restore confidence and tackle the challenges of wars, internal conflicts, insecurity, fragility and transition.
The deployment of multiple UN-authorised missions in the same theatre of operations, with different actors and regional organisations, is increasingly the reality of modern peace operations. However, managing these complex partnerships, while not duplicating work or missions, is essential to successful operations. In this regard, Members called for the evaluation and rationalisation of the existing structures .
Better coordination : the committee urged the EU, given the scale of the challenges and the complex involvement of other organisations and nations, to seek an appropriate division of labour and to focus on where it can best add value. It considered that UN and AU missions are in need of a comprehensive approach under which, in addition to deploying military, diplomatic and development instruments, other essential factors are a thorough knowledge of the security environment, exchanges of intelligence and information and modern technologies. It stressed the importance of the other instruments of the EU in the security field and, in particular, of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions and operations.
Provision of military forces: Members noted that the perceived legitimacy of a PSO is key to its success. They believed that the AU should therefore contribute with support and military forces wherever possible . They welcomed the UN-EU Strategic Partnership on Peacekeeping and Crisis Management and called on the EU to make further efforts to facilitate Member State contributions. They recalled that the EU has engaged in crisis-management activities in Africa. However, only 11 of the 28 EU Member States made pledges at the 28 September 2015 Leaders’ Summit on Peacekeeping, while China pledged a standby force of 8 000 and Colombia 5 000 troops. Accordingly, Members called on the EU Member States to significantly increase their military and police contributions to UN peacekeeping missions.
Prevention of conflicts : recalling the need for a rapid African response to crisis, Members emphasised the importance of investing more in conflict prevention. They recognised the critical contribution of the African Peace Facility in developing the triangular partnership between the UN, the EU and the AU, but considered it vital that the EU institutions and Member States remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully utilised. They took the view that the Facility should focus on structural support rather than just bankrolling African forces' pay.
Military assistance for African states : Members observed that stepping up European military cooperation would increase the efficiency and effectiveness of Europe's contribution to UN peace missions. They called on the EU and its Member States, as well as on other members of the international community, to assist with training , including discipline, equipment, logistical support, financial assistance and development of rules of engagement, to encourage and assist the African Standby Force .
Members also considered that the Official Development Assistance (ODA) needs to be redesigned under the OECD framework through peace building lenses. Similarly, the EDF regulation should be reviewed in order to allow programming design that includes peace, security and justice expenditures.
The committee insisted that neither the EU nor the Member States, in supporting PSOs, should act in isolation but that they should, rather, take full account of the contributions of other international actors, improve coordination with them, improve rapidity of response , and focus their efforts on certain priority countries.
A holistic EU approach : Members supported a holistic EU approach, which is the main instrument for mobilising the full potential of EU action in the context of peacekeeping operations and the stabilisation process, as well as for mobilising various ways to support the development of AU countries. They stressed that border management assistance should be a priority for EU engagement in Africa.
Targeted funds : Members recognised that the problem is often not the lack of funding but, rather, how funds are spent and what other resources are utilised. They backed initiatives such as the Békou trust fund operating in the Central African Republic. They believed the current funding programme is unsustainable, and that conditions should be attached to the African Peace Facility in order to encourage the AU to increase its own contributions to PSOs.
Sexual abuse by United Nations personnel : lastly, Members took note of the UN Evaluation Report of 15 May 2015 on sexual exploitation and abuse by United Nations personnel. They considered that the AU, the UN, the EU and Member States should exercise strong vigilance concerning such criminal matters and urged the most rigorous disciplinary and judicial procedures and the utmost effort to prevent such crimes.
It should be noted that in a minority report tabled by the GUE/NGL, Members pointed out that the report aims to increase EU contribution to peace support operations. They felt that the responsibility-to-protect-mechanism should not be used as a pretext for military intervention. They considered that NATO should leave the African continent, and stressed the need for a strict separation of EU from NATO in this context.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0249/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0158/2016
- Committee opinion: PE575.372
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE578.460
- Committee draft report: PE575.014
- Committee draft report: PE575.014
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE578.460
- Committee opinion: PE575.372
Activities
- Jonathan ARNOTT
- Nicola CAPUTO
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
- Notis MARIAS
- Miguel VIEGAS
- Louis ALIOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joëlle BERGERON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jane COLLINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andi CRISTEA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edward CZESAK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michel DANTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mark DEMESMAEKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Norbert ERDŐS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena GENTILE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michela GIUFFRIDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvie GODDYN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antanas GUOGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Béla KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Svetoslav Hristov MALINOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louis-Joseph MANSCOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Valentinas MAZURONIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- József NAGY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Norica NICOLAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Margot PARKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav POCHE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Julia REID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liliana RODRIGUES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fernando RUAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tokia SAÏFI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daciana Octavia SÂRBU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ricardo SERRÃO SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Remo SERNAGIOTTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christos STYLIANIDES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beatrix von STORCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel SVOBODA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mihai ŢURCANU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bodil VALERO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paavo VÄYRYNEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sotirios ZARIANOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0158/2016 - Geoffrey Van Orden - § 9/3 #
A8-0158/2016 - Geoffrey Van Orden - § 18 #
A8-0158/2016 - Geoffrey Van Orden - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
165 |
2015/2275(INI)
2016/02/25
AFET
165 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 — having regard to Title V of the Treaty on European Union, and in particular to Articles 21, 41, 42, and 43 thereof,
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recognizes that 1.5 billion people live in fragile and conflict affected regions worldwide and fragile states and that ungoverned spaces are spreading, leaving many in poverty, lawlessness, thriving corruption and violence;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Peace Support Operations (PSOs) are a form of crisis response, normally in support of an internationally recognised organisation such as the UN or the African Union (AU), with a UN mandate, and designed to pre
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Rejects robust peacekeeping missions, as past (robust) missions have not been successful at all in terms of long-term stability and peace; opposes that the responsibility-to-protect-mechanism is used as a pretext for military intervention; highlights that sustainable peace can only be achieved with civilian peace-building measures, not militarily; stresses that poverty and social, political and economic inequalities are root causes of conflict evolvement; recalls to truly implement measures to eradicate poverty, implement DDR-programs, arms control, favouring balanced economic relations and increasing humanitarian and development aid to ensure sustainable socio-economic development;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Insists that
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Insists that the EU, in supporting PSOs, should not act in isolation but should, rather, take full account of the contributions of other international actors, improve coordination with them and rapidity of response, and
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Supports a holistic EU approach, which is the main instrument for mobilising the full potential of EU action in the context of peacekeeping operations and the stabilisation process, as well as for mobilising various ways to support the development of AU countries;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that border management assistance should be a priority for EU engagement in Africa; notes that porous borders are one of the main factors behind the increase in terrorism in Africa;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports the objectives of the Joint Communication on capacity-building, and joins the Council in calling for its urgent implementation; points out the EU’s potential particularly through civil means, to help strengthen security in fragile and conflict-affected countries, while reiterating that security is a precondition for development; encourages the EEAS and the Commission to speed up the implementation of CSBD initiative to improve the effectiveness and sustainability of CSDP missions;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports the objectives of the Joint Communication on capacity-building, and joins the Council in calling for its urgent implementation; points out the EU
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Points out that the Council Legal Service's contribution of 7 December 2015, entitled 'Capacity building in support of security and development - legal questions', gives thought to ways and means of financing matériel for African countries' militaries; calls on the Council to continue this discussion;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Welcomes the positive responses received by France after activation of Article 42(7); very much welcomes the re- engagement of European armed forces in Africa;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recognises that the problem is often not lack of funding but, rather, how funds are spent and what other resources are utilised; questions whether the Court of Auditors
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Peace Support Operations (PSOs) are a form of crisis response, normally
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes concern over the possible lack of transparency in EU PSOs; stresses that full investigations should be carried out if grievances arise and that crimes like sexual exploitation and abuse should be prosecuted and sentenced; recalls the need to improve current EU funding for PSOs; underlines that African security should, in the future, be monitored by the AU, supported by the international community;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recognises that the problem is often not lack of funding but, rather, how funds are spent and what other resources are utilised;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recognises that the problem is often not lack of funding but, rather, how funds are spent and what other resources are utilised; questions whether the Court of Auditors’ recommendations concerning EU funds have been fully implemented; calls for regular reviews of how funding from national governments through the EU and UN is spent; believes it is vital to utilise funds effectively, given their finite nature and the scale of the problems being faced; believes accountability is an essential part of this process as well as helping to tackle endemic corruption in Africa; insists on a more thorough and transparent evaluation of PSOs supported by the EU;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Notes the 15 May 2015 UN Evaluation Report on Enforcement and Remedial Assistance Efforts for Sexual Exploitation and Abuse by the United Nations and Related Personnel in Peacekeeping Operations; is deeply shocked by the alarming scope of these crimes, and the failure to hold perpetrators to account; is equally shocked by recent sexual child abuse allegations against French and UN troops in the Central African Republic and calls for strong, transparent and swift responses by the UN and relevant French authorities; urges the UN, EU Member States and the EU's CSDP organs to investigate, prosecute and sentence any UN, national and EU personnel who committed acts of sexual violence without delay and with firmest resolve;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Considers that the EU should make a strong vigilance to the respect of human rights by members of the supported PSOs and , therefore, despite leaving justice in the hands of National Authorities, a real and effective accountability and vigilance of the EU should be established and guaranteed in order to make sure that justice is applied;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls for regular reviews to be carried out to determine how far Member States have met their contribution commitments;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Points out that security and development are intrinsically linked; welcomes the fact that since the adoption of the regulation on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, which came into force on 1 January 2013, the Commission has been authorised to set up and manage trust funds under an agreement concluded with other donors; gives strong backing, accordingly, to initiatives such as the Békou trust fund operating in the Central African Republic, which seeks to pool European development-related resources, expertise and capacities in order to overcome the fragmentation and ineffectiveness of international action in the context of reconstruction of a country;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14 b. Stresses the urgent need to reform relevant structures in a way to end impunity of UN and EU personnel and by establishing functioning and transparent oversight and accountability mechanisms; finds it unacceptable that currently legal actions regarding alleged abuses remain purely voluntary and depended of the troop-contributing country; is convinced that also via training and education such grave crimes could be reduced and prevented; strongly welcomes the 28th September 2015 declaration of Leaders' Summit on Peacekeeping on the matter;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new) 14 c. Welcomes the EU Guidelines on violence against women and girls and the EU guidelines on children and armed conflict; urges the adoption of a code of conduct for EU personnel serving in military and civil missions which makes it clear that sexual exploitation constitutes unjustifiable and criminal behaviour;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 e (new) 14 e. Stresses that it is important that the EU and the UN should appoint more female police officers and soldiers to missions and operations; recalls the experience made with the contingent of female police officers within the UN peace-keeping force in Liberia; stresses the need for gender advisors for individual missions and operations and specific actions plans which design how UNSCR 1325 is being implemented at the level of each mission and operation; calls on the relevant EU and UN actors to make sure that also at the HQ level more women are being appointed at senior management level;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for a concerted effort towards capacity-building by the EU and the UN
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Peace Support Operations (PSOs) are a form of crisis response, normally in support of an internationally recognised organisation such as the UN or the African Union (AU), with a UN mandate, and designed to restore or maintain peace, enforce peace agreements and tackle the complex emergencies and challenges posed by failing or weak states;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes concern over the possible lack of transparency in EU PSOs; stresses that full investigations should be carried out if grievances arise; recalls the need to improve current EU funding for PSOs;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Maintains that crimes committed by peacekeepers should be treated as an extremely serious matter and the utmost efforts made to prevent them;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) A a. whereas the AU and EU have a shared neighbourhood, history and future and the stability of that neighbourhood would greatly benefit the climate of all member states;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes concern over the possible lack of transparency in EU PSOs; stresses that full investigations should be carried out if grievances arise; recalls the need to improve current EU funding for PSOs; underlines that African security should, in the future, be monitored by the AU, supported by the international community; urges the EU and the UN to step up their support for the development of regional conflict management mechanisms, such as the African rapid response force;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the aim of PSOs is to help
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas the current situation of massive violation of Human Rights and the terrorist threat demands the establishment of Peace- enforcing missions prior to the peacekeeping of the areas in conflict;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes concern over the
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the security landscape in Africa in particular has changed dramatically in the last decade, with peace
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes concern over the
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the security landscape in Africa in particular has changed dramatically in the last decade, with peace enforcement and counter-terrorism operations becoming the rule rather than the exception in many areas; whereas the porous borders within the continent help fuel violence and reduce security; whereas the emergence of new centres of terrorist activity in the Sahel- Sahara region and the tensions in Central Africa are forcing the EU to reassess its civilian and military involvement in these parts of the world;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Regrets that the African Peace Facility (APF) is still mainly financed via the EDF, whereas EDF financing was clearly meant to be provisional back in 2003 when the APF was established; calls on the Commission to make a proposal during the review of the EU Multiannual Financial Framework in order to integrate the financing of the APF into the EU budget, possibly through a new instrument for building capacities in the security sector; considers that this way of financing would solve the ongoing problems related to the eligibility of some APF expenditures;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the security landscape in Africa in particular has changed dramatically in the last decade, with peace enforcement and counter-terrorism operations becoming the rule rather than the exception in many areas; whereas the porous borders within the continent help fuel violence
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines that African security should primarily be monitored by the AU, supported by the international community; insists on the need for African partners to take greater ownership and responsibility for the stability of the continent; in this regard, welcomes the decision of the AU, on 15 June 2015, to allocate 25% of its resources to the AU's peace support operations budget;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) C a. whereas 1.5 billion people live in fragile and conflict affected regions worldwide and fragile states and ungoverned spaces are spreading leaving many in poverty, lawlessness, thriving corruption and violence;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the EU to lead the discussions on redesigning Official Development Assistance (ODA) under the OECD framework through peacebuilding lenses;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the declaration made at the 28 September 2015 Leader's Summit on Peace-Keeping convened by President Barack Obama of the United States,
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Stresses the need for coordinated external actions that make use of diplomatic, security and development tools to restore confidence and tackle challenges of wars, internal conflicts, insecurity, fragility and transition;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) C b. whereas peace has been recognized as crucial for development in the new 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16 on peace and justice has been introduced;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses the need for the EEAS to develop a much more efficient and strategic approach to the UN agencies in particular regarding programming of the external financial instruments; calls on the HR and relevant EU Delegations in instable regions to ensure stronger visibility of EU aid on the ground;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas appropriately experienced and equipped organisations and nations should provide those military and civilian resources necessary for a successful PSO, in order to help create the conditions for civil organisations to do their work;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas appropriately experienced and equipped organisations and nations should provide those military resources necessary for a successful PSO, in order to help create the
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas appropriately experienced and equipped organisations and nations should provide those
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for a comprehensive plan to reinforce sustainable development policies in peacekeeping operations in order to ensure long-term development; recalls the need to provide tools to achieve clear steps towards democracy and democratic values such as the rule of law
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas appropriately experienced and equipped organisations and nations, with a clear and realistic UN mandate, should provide those military resources necessary for a successful PSO, in order to help create the conditions for civil organisations to do their work;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for a comprehensive plan to reinforce sustainable development policies in peacekeeping operations in order to ensure long-term development; recalls the need to provide tools to achieve clear steps towards democracy and democratic values such as the rule of law and freedom of speech, along with a sustainable economy and stable society; notes that civilian conflict prevention and peacebuilding activities cannot be overlooked in favour of military and short-term crisis management aspects of peace and security; underlines the need for a comprehensive plan regarding conflict areas and their surroundings with a view to preventing the emergence of new conflicts; calls, in this regard, for an early warning system;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the AU operates under different constraints to the UN
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for a comprehensive plan to reinforce sustainable development policies in
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the AU operates under different constraints to the UN and can take sides, intervene without invitation, and intervene where no peace accord has been signed; whereas given the number of inter-state and intra-state conflicts in Africa this is an important difference;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for a comprehensive plan to reinforce sustainable development policies in peacekeeping operations in order to ensure long-term development; recalls the need to provide tools to achieve clear steps towards democracy and democratic values such as the rule of law and freedom of speech, along with a sustainable economy and stable society; underlines the need for a comprehensive plan regarding conflict areas and their surroundings with a view to preventing the emergence of new conflicts;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. whereas the crises in Africa call for a global response which goes well beyond the purely security aspects; whereas all local and international actors have highlighted the need for close coordination between security and development policy as the only realistic way of remedying the instability which affects many African countries; whereas the EU, along with the UN, is the only international organisation which has the economic, financial and security resources needed to support this vital global approach;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for a comprehensive plan to reinforce sustainable development policies in peacekeeping operations in order to ensure long-term development; recalls the need to provide tools to achieve clear steps towards democracy and democratic values such as human rights, the rule of law and freedom of
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. whereas the UN Liaison Office for Peace and Security and the Permanent Mission of the African Union in Brussels play key roles in developing relationships between their organisations and the EU, NATO and national embassies;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Requests in this context that EU support to civil society organisations (CSOs) should feature more prominently in all partnerships and a more strategic engagement with CSOs that should be mainstreamed in all external instruments and programmes and in all areas of cooperation, in particular in the peace and security agenda; recalls that the Council has recognised the essential role of CSOs here;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the primary mechanism for European cooperation with the AU is the African Peace Facility, originally established in 2004 and providing some €EUR 1.9 billion through the Member State-funded EDF; whereas the 2014-2016 action programme takes account of external evaluation and consultations with Member States and introduces new elements to improve its effectiveness; whereas article 43 TEU refers to the so called Petersberg Plus tasks covering military advice and assistance tasks, conflict prevention and peace-keeping tasks, tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peace-making and post-conflict stabilisation;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Reminds that peace has been recognized as crucial for development in the new 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and that Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16 on peace and justice has been introduced;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 — having regard to the documents of 14 June 2012 'Plan of Action to enhance EU CSDP support to UN peacekeeping' and of 23 March 2015 ‘Strengthening the UN- EU Strategic Partnership on Peacekeeping and Crisis Management: Priorities 2015- 2018’4 , _________________ 4 EEAS(2015)458, Council document 7632/15.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the aim of clarifying EU engagement boundaries on Peace Support
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the primary mechanism for European cooperation with the AU is the African Peace Facility, originally established in 2004 and providing some €EUR 1.9 billion through the Member State-funded EDF; whereas in 2007 the scope of the Facility was broadened to encompass a wider range of conflict- prevention and post-conflict stabilisation activities; whereas the 2014-2016 action programme takes account of external evaluation and consultations with Member States and introduces new elements to improve its effectiveness; whereas strengthening the institutional capacity of the African Union and the African regional economic communities is vital to the success of PSOs and of post-conflict reconciliation and rehabilitation processes;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Draws attention to the threat posed by the rise of terrorism in Africa and the growing number of terrorist groups, such as Boko Haram; stresses the importance of supporting effective anti-terrorism policies in developing countries and promoting the creation of jobs for young people, given that unemployment makes them easy targets for recruitment by terrorist groups;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas in 2014 more than 90% of the budget of the African Peace Facility was earmarked for peace-support operations; whereas 65% of those funds were set aside to fund expenditure on AMISOM staff; whereas, according to the head of AMISOM, Francisco Caetano José Madeira, the EU has cut its funding for uniformed mission staff by 20%;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Regrets that quite often "peacekeeping" operations are just devoted to an unstable maintenance of a surface of security; urges a deep rethinking of the concept, structure and even name of these operations; reaffirms and strongly underlines the need to have operations really conceived to deal with the deep root of war, instability and underdevelopment in a given region and with a high level of resiliency;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the EU’s role needs to be seen in the context of the contributions made to PSOs by numerous countries and organisations; whereas, for example, the US is the world’s largest financial contributor to UN peacekeeping operations and provides direct support to the AU through its African Peacekeeping Rapid Response Partnership, as well as approximately USD 5 billion in support of UN operations in the Central African Republic, Mali, Côte d’Ivoire, South Sudan and Somalia; whereas China has become an active participant in UN peacekeeping operations and the Forum of China-Africa cooperation includes the AU Commission; whereas, after Ethiopia, it is India, Pakistan and Bangladesh that are the largest providers of personnel to UN peacekeeping; whereas these various sources of funding are coordinated by the African Union Partners Group on Peace and Security;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that sexual violence is used as a weapon of war in many conflict areas; stresses that women and girls are especially vulnerable during conflicts; underlines their need for protection, supported by trained armed forces, who are respecting human rights.
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the EU’s role needs to be seen in the context of the contributions made to PSOs by numerous countries
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses the need of a coherent and comprehensive approach for peace, stability and development; and strongly underlines the need to deal with development issues in a long-term perspective, taking into consideration the root causes of the problem; but strongly condemns the attempt to use funds devoted to development in order to act in different - even if related - field, as security and peace;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas, nevertheless, the EU is a key contributor to PSOs; whereas France trains 25 000 African soldiers each year and deploys 4400 men in operations in the context of MINUSCA and MINUSMA and in support of the armies of the Sahel G5 countries;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Remember the utmost importance of disarmament - with particular attention to non-military fighters and irregular troops - in order to reach stability and development goals;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) J a. whereas only 11 of the 28 EU Member States have made very modest pledges at the 28th September 2015 Leaders' Summit on Peacekeeping; whereas at this summit China has pledged a 8000 standby force and Colombia 5000 troops;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need to see PSOs in terms of a continuum between conflict prevention, conflict resolution and post-conflict development;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) J a. whereas in 2014 and 2015 EU financial commitments to the AU totalled €717.9m (of which €595.1m was for PSOs and €51.7m was for the operationalisation of the African Peace and Security Architecture and the Early Response Mechanism) and AU contributions were just €25m;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need to see PSOs in terms of
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J b (new) J b. whereas in the 15 May 2015 UN Evaluation Report on Enforcement and Remedial Assistance Efforts for Sexual Exploitation and Abuse 480 allegations between 2008 and 2013 were listed;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need to see PSOs in terms of a continuum between conflict prevention, conflict resolution, peace-building and post-conflict development; underlines the need for a holistic approach to peacekeeping operations by the UN, the AU, the EU and othe
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas anti-personnel landmines have been a major obstacle to post-conflict rehabilitation and development, not least in Africa, and the EU has spent some EUR 1.5 billion over the past 20 years
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Insists on a continuous political dialogue between the EU and the AU on peace and security challenges and on how to consolidate recent APF gains over the longer-term;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas, in addition to the role of individual European countries, the EU has a distinctive contribution to make in PSOs with
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Expresses concern at the growing number of cases in which peacekeeping forces are implicated in human rights violations, such as rape; calls on the EU, the UN and the African Union to ensure that peacekeeping forces are made to comply with international humanitarian law;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to the "Oslo" Guidelines on the Use of Foreign Military and Civil Defence Assets in Disaster Relief of November 2007,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the aim of clarifying EU engagement boundaries on Peace Support Operations (PSOs) with the United Nations (UN) and the African Union (AU); recalls that the EU budget cannot be used to directly finance military or defence operations (Article 41(2) TEU) but does not explicitly exclude peacekeeping operations with development objectives; furthermore, recalls that Articles 209 and 212 TFEU do not explicitly exclude the financing of capacity-building in the security sector; underlines the importance of EU support for AU peacekeeping operations approved by the UN;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas, in addition to the role of individual European countries, the EU has a distinctive contribution to make in PSOs with financial and other resources, in particular via the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace and in full compliance with the Oslo Guidelines;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that emphasis should be on political, humanitarian and development policy efforts
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that political, humanitarian and development policy efforts should be used initially, supported by civilian peacekeeping operations, and should be
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) N a. whereas when APF was established in 2003, its financing via EDF funds was meant to be provisional, only for the time necessary to find alternative funding sources; whereas 12 years later EDF remains the main source of funding for APF;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that political, humanitarian and development policy efforts should be used initially, supported by
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas the European Council has
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that political, humanitarian and development policy efforts should be used initially, supported by civilian peacekeeping operations, and should be transformed into military operations only when necessary;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that political, humanitarian and development policy efforts should be
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas the EU should
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes with the deepest concern and deplores the relevant amount of cases of women sexual exploitation, encouraged prostitution, children prostitution and children trafficking, often spreading during and immediately after peacekeeping operations; calls on all the relevant authorities - in particular when EU is engaged in these operations - to urgently take any efforts to stop these violations, to protect victims, to bring the perpetrators to justice and to put human rights at the core centre of any initiative conducted in the framework of the said operations.
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas the EU should
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas Article 41(2) TEU prohibits expenditure from EU budgets on operations having military or defence implications; whereas Articles 209 and 212 TFEU do not explicitly exclude the financing of capacity-building in the security sector; whereas the EU is currently working on the creation of a new CBSD dedicated instrument to equip the trained personnel in the framework of the CSDP missions;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas Article 41(2) TEU prohibits expenditure from EU budgets on operations having military or defence implications while not explicitly excluding EU financing of military tasks before and after operations; whereas Articles 209 and 212 TFEU do not explicitly exclude the financing of capacity-building in the security sector;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas Article 41(2) TEU prohibits expenditure from EU budgets on operations having military or defence implications, but does not explicitly exclude peacekeeping operations with developmental objectives; whereas Articles 209 and 212 TFEU do not explicitly exclude the financing of capacity-building in the security sector;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to resolution of the ACP- EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly of 9 December 2015 on 'The evaluation of the African Peace Facility after ten years: effectiveness and prospects for the future',
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the aim of clarifying EU engagement boundaries on Peace Support Operations (PSOs) with the United Nations (UN) and the African Union (AU); recalls that the EU budget cannot be used to directly finance military or defence operations (Article 41(2) TEU); underlines the importance of EU support for AU peacekeeping operations approved by the UN; stresses the need for the EU to have a European external defence capability integrated into NATO for the purpose of maintaining peace;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas Article 41(2) TEU prohibits expenditure from EU budgets on operations having military or defence implications; whereas this expenditure is charged to the Member States under the Athena mechanism; whereas Articles 209 and 212 TFEU do not explicitly exclude the financing of capacity-building in the security sector;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q a (new) Q a. whereas the European Development Fund (EDF) and the African Peace Facility as instruments outside the EU budget are currently particularly relevant in the current efforts to comprehensively address security-development nexus;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q b (new) Q b. whereas the European Development Fund (EDF) requires that programming is so designed that, as far as possible, it meets the criteria for Official Development Assistance (ODA) and ODA criteria mostly exclude security related expenses (only 7 percent of DAC Members' contributions to UN peacekeeping missions are ODA compliant);
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R R. whereas, and above all, the needs of the countries concerned
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R R. whereas, and above all, the needs of the countries concerned, rather than any institutional ambition or the desire to prematurely
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R R. whereas
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R R. whereas, and above all, the needs of the countries concerned, rather than any institutional ambition or the desire prematurely to impose values which may have little relevance to the immediate crisis,
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R R. whereas, and above all, the needs of the countries concerned, rather than
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the aim of clarifying EU engagement boundaries on Peace Support Operations (PSOs) with the United Nations (UN) and the African Union (AU); strongly recalls that the EU budget cannot be used to directly finance military or defence operations (Article 41(2) TEU);
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Stresses the need for coordinated external actions that make use of diplomatic, security and development tools to restore confidence and tackle challenges of wars, internal conflicts, insecurity, fragility and transition;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of early communication and enhanced procedures for crisis consultation with the UN and the AU
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of early communication and enhanced procedures for crisis consultation with the UN and the AU, as well as other organisations such as NATO and the OSCE; highlights the need to improve information sharing, including on the planning, conduct and analysis of missions;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the EU, given the scale of the challenges and the complex involvement of other organisations and nations, to seek an appropriate division of labour and focus on where it can best add value; notes that a number of Member States are already involved in operations in Africa and that the EU could generate real value added by supporting these operations more;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses the importance of the other instruments of the UE in security field, and in particular, the CSDP missions and operations; recalls that the EU is intervening in Africa to contribute to the stabilization of the countries facing crises, in particular through the training missions; underlines the role of the CSDP missions, both civilian and military, in supporting reforms of the security sector and contributing to the international crisis management strategy;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the perceived legitimacy of a PSO is key to its success; believes to this end that the AU should contribute the military forces wherever possible; notes that this is also important with regard to the long term self-policing aims of the AU; underscores that with a view on legitimacy, ensuring accountability for any crimes committed by personnel employed in the context of a PSO is vital; calls on the EU and its Member States to be a driving force in the UN and in relations with the AU for reforming and strengthening accountability systems in the framework of peacekeeping and peace support operations;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the perceived legitimacy of a PSO is key to its success; believes to this end that the AU should contribute
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes the UN-EU Strategic Partnership on Peacekeeping and Crisis Management and its priorities for 2015-2018 as agreed in March 2015;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes the UN-EU Strategic Partnership on Peacekeeping and Crisis Management and its priorities for 2015-2018 as agreed in March 2015; encourages further work by the EU in order to take account of the key role of other organisations and countries and facilitate Member State contributions; deplores that only 11 of 28 EU Member States made pledges at the 28th September 2015 Leader's Summit on Peacekeeping; calls on the EU Member States to significantly increase their military and police contributions to UN peacekeeping missions;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to Article 4h and 4j of the Constitutive Act of the African Union;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the aim of clarifying EU engagement boundaries on Peace Support Operations (PSOs) with the United Nations (UN) and the African Union (AU); recalls that the EU budget cannot be used to directly finance military or defence operations (Article 41(2) TEU);
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes the UN-EU Strategic Partnership on Peacekeeping and Crisis Management and its priorities for 2015-2018 as agreed in March 2015; welcomes the past and on- going civilian and/or military CSDP missions on the African continent and their efforts in the field of peacekeeping; encourages further work by the EU in order to take account of the key role of other organisations; mainly pan-african or regional organizations; and countries and facilitate Member State contributions; calls on the EU Member States to significantly increase their military and police contributions to UN peacekeeping missions;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes the UN-EU Strategic Partnership on Peacekeeping and Crisis Management and its priorities for 2015-2018 as agreed in March 2015;
Amendment 73 #
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the increasing capacity of the AU to provide a collective response
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the increasing capacity of the AU to provide a collective response by African countries to conflict on the continent, strengthening African ownership; highlights the contribution of the African Peace Facility to the funding of the AU; underlines the need for a rapid African response to crisis, and identifies the key role in this of the African Standby Force (ASF); encourages regional organizations, like the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) or the Southern African Development Community (SADC), to increase their efforts in the area of rapid African respones to crises and to complement the efforts of the AU;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Emphasises, nevertheless, the importance of investing more in conflict prevention, taking account of factors such as political or religious radicalisation, election-related violence, population displacements or climate change;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the African Peace Facility provides both an entry point and a potential lever for creating a stronger partnership between the EU and the AU; considers it vital that the
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the African Peace Facility provides both an entry point and a potential lever for creating a stronger partnership between the EU and the AU; believes, further, that this facility is an important source of funding for Africa and that, on that basis, it plays a vital role in enabling the African Union and, through it, the eight regional economic communities (RECs) to plan and carry out their operations; considers it vital that the EU institutions and Member States should remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully exploited; acknowledges that there are other funding mechanisms in use, but believes that given the Facility’s predictability and reliability, its singular focus on Africa, as well as its clear goals, it is especially important with regard to PSOs in Africa;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 b (new) - having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2010 on the 10th anniversary of UN Security Council resolution 1325 on women and peace and security,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Deplores that only 11 out of 28 EU Member States made pledges at the 28th September 2015 Leader's Summit on Peacekeeping;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the African Peace Facility provides both an entry point and a potential lever for creating a stronger partnership between the EU and the AU; considers it vital that the EU institutions and Member States should remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the African Peace Facility provides both an entry point and a potential lever for creating a stronger partnership between the EU and the AU; considers it vital that the EU institutions and Member States should remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully exploited; acknowledges that there are other funding mechanisms in use, but believes that given the Facility’s singular focus on Africa, as well as its clear goals, it is especially important with regard to PSOs in Africa; calls for more systematic joint programming among the various EU instruments;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the African Peace Facility provides both an entry point and a potential lever for creating a stronger partnership between the EU and the AU; considers it vital that the EU institutions and Member States should remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully exploited as well as that the AU demonstrates higher levels of efficiency and transparency in using the funds; acknowledges that there are other funding mechanisms in use, but believes that given the Facility’s singular focus on Africa, as well as its clear goals, it is especially important with regard to PSOs in Africa;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the African Peace Facility provides both an entry point and a potential lever for creating a stronger partnership between the EU and the AU; considers it vital that the EU institutions and Member States should remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully exploited; call on the Commission to strike a fresh geographic balance as regards the use of the funds concerned, however, in order to take account more effectively of the new security challenges in Africa, in particular in the Sahel-Sahara region and in Central Africa; takes the view that the African Peace Facility ought to focus on structural support, in particular infrastructure facilities, rather than bankrolling African forces' pay; acknowledges that there are other funding mechanisms in use, but believes that given the Facility’s singular focus on Africa, as well as its clear goals, it is especially important with regard to PSOs in Africa;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Regrets that the APF is still mainly financed via the EDF, whereas EDF financing was clearly meant to be provisional back in 2003; calls on the Commission to make a proposal during the mid-term review of the EU Multiannual Financial Framework aiming at integrating the financing of the APF into the EU budget; considers that this way of financing would solve the ongoing problems related to the eligibility of some APF expenditures;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Backs the Council conclusions of 24 September 2012, which state that 'funding, alternative to the funding from the European Development Fund, will have to be considered';
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Observes that stepping up European military cooperation would increase the efficiency and effectiveness of Europe's contribution to UN peace missions;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Points out that the EU must continue to make women's involvement in peace support operations, plus gender mainstreaming, a key component of long- term peace building; calls for persons deployed on PSOs to be systematically trained in compliance with human rights, in particular women's rights, and for awareness to be raised of gender violence and of the provision of care for victims in conflict situations;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 c (new) - having regard to the Council conclusions of 15 October 2012 on the roots of democracy and sustainable development: Europe's engagement with civil society in external relations,
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recognizes that the European Development Fund (EDF) and the African Peace Facility (APF) as instruments outside the EU budget are currently particularly relevant in the current efforts to comprehensively address security-development nexus; considers, in this regards, that the EDF regulation should be reviewed in order to allow programming design that includes increased peace, security and justice expenditures that have developmental motivation, as to allow the continuation and increase in financing for instruments such as the APF as well as to achieve SDG 16 on peace and justice;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the EU and its Member States, as well as on other members of the international community, to assist with training, non-lethal equipment, logistic support and development of rules of engagement (RoE), encouraging and facilitating African states in full and continuing their commitment to the ASF; urges, in this regard, more active advocacy of the ASF in African capitals by Member State embassies and EU delegations;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the EU and its Member States
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the EU and its Member States, as well as on other members of the international community, to assist with training (and its pertinent evaluations), equipment, logistic support, financial assistance and development of rules of engagement (RoE), encouraging and facilitating African states in full and continuing their commitment to the ASF; urges, in this regard, more active advocacy of the ASF in African capitals by Member State embassies and EU delegations;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the EU and its Member States, as well as on other members of the international community, to assist with training including discipline, equipment, logistic support and development of rules of engagement (RoE), to encourag
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. calls on the EU to lead the discussions on redesigning Official Development Assistance (ODA) under the OECD framework through peacebuilding lenses;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Notes the importance of Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions for Africa's security, in particular training and support missions for African forces, and especially EUTM Mali, EUCAP Sahel Mali and EUCAP Sahel Niger, EUTM Somalia, and EUCAP Nestor; notes the additional support provided by those missions for the efforts of other, UN-run missions; calls on the EU to step up the capabilities of those training missions, in particular by allowing African soldiers who have been trained to be monitored on and after their return from theatres of operations;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11 b. Considers that the EDF regulation should be reviewed in order to allow programming design that includes peace, security and justice expenditures that have developmental motivation, as to allow the continuation and increase in financing for instruments such as the APF as well as to achieve SDG 16 on peace and justice;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Insists that the EU, in supporting PSOs, should
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Insists that the EU, in supporting PSOs, should not act in isolation but should, rather, take full account of the contributions of other international actors, improve coordination with them and rapidity of response, and focus its efforts on certain priority countries, using the most appropriate and experienced Member States as lead nations; points up the importance of regional economic communities (REC) within the general security architecture in Africa;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Insists that the EU, in supporting PSOs, should not act in isolation but should, rather, take full account of the contributions of other international actors, improve coordination with them and rapidity of response, and focus its efforts on certain priority countries, using the most appropriate and experienced Member and African States as lead nations;
source: 578.460
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.014New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-575014_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.460New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-578460_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.372&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-575372_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0158&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0158_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0249New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0249_EN.html |
activities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/8/04818New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/4 |
|
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2016-04-18T00:00:00New
2016-04-19T00:00:00 |
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/committees/0/date |
2015-09-15T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/0/date |
2015-09-15T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|