BETA


2015/2280(INI) European territorial cooperation - best practices and innovative measures

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI MIHAYLOVA Iskra (icon: ALDE ALDE) HETMAN Krzysztof (icon: PPE PPE), DĂNCILĂ Viorica (icon: S&D S&D), PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr (icon: ECR ECR), ROPĖ Bronis (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ADINOLFI Isabella (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/12/21
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/09/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/09/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 523 votes to 76 with 38 abstentions, a resolution on European Territorial Cooperation - best practices and innovative measures.

European Added Value of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC ): whilst recalling that around 38 % of Europe’s population lives in border regions , Parliament noted that the ETC budget of EUR 10.1 billion represents 2.8 % of the cohesion policy budget, does not match the great challenges that ETC has to meet, and does not reflect the high level of its European added value.

Members called for greater respect for Article 174 TFEU on territorial cohesion, in particular as regards rural areas and areas affected by industrial transition, and regions that suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps. They acknowledged that cross-border cooperation (CBC) is a key tool for the development of border regions:

it has helped in terms of supporting research , innovation and the knowledge economy, adapting to climate change, and promoting sustainable transport and mobility through transnational approaches; it is particularly important for the protection of the environment, especially in the areas of water, biodiversity and energy; it has allowed cities and regions to cooperate on a variety of issues and themes, involving exchange of experience and good practices, and makes a geographical area more attractive for trading companies; it offers significant European added value, contributing to peace, stability and regional integration, and can bring added value to the management of the migration crisis .

Members called on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to work together and exchange information and good practices in order to undertake assessments and issue guidelines as to how results orientation can be adapted to ETC specificities. The report also called for structured monitoring systems and evaluation plans in order to better evaluate the achievements of the results in terms of the Europe 2020 goals and territorial integration.

Contribution to territorial cohesion : Members encouraged the Member States to make greater use of Integrated Territorial Investment ( ITI ) and Community-Led Local Development ( CLLD ), which are not implemented widely enough in the Interreg programmes for 2014-2020. They recommend that special focus be placed on projects giving priority to:

the adaptation of social and mobility infrastructure to demographic change and migratory flows; the creation of specific goods and services aimed at an ageing population; support for job opportunities for older people, women and migrants that contribute to social inclusion; enhanced digital connections and the creation of platforms that enable and foster the participation of the citizens of more isolated regions and their interaction with the various administrative, social and political services.

Support for research and innovation : Parliament stressed the need to create cross-border innovation policy approaches, such as joint research and mobility programmes, joint research infrastructures, partnerships and cooperation networks. It recommended that local and regional authorities take full advantage of the possibilities of combining those funds ( European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI), Horizon 2020, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), etc.) to support SMEs and research and innovation projects, including cross-border projects.

Governance and policy coordination : while welcoming the simplified EGTC Regulation ( Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 ), Members stressed that this regulation is not sufficient to overcome all existing legal obstacles to cross-border cooperation. They welcomed, therefore, the initiative of the Luxembourg Presidency, which proposed a specific legal tool for border regions, as well as the Commission’s initiative of carrying out, by the end of 2016, an analysis of the barriers to cross-border cooperation that will look at solutions and examples of good practices.

Stressing the ever-increasing importance of cross-border labour markets , Members called on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the opportunities provided by the Interreg programmes to facilitate cross-border labour mobility.

Simplification : Members called on the Commission to propose specific actions to simplify the rules on reporting, auditing and state aid and to harmonise procedures. Arrangements for involving civil society and private stakeholders must be broadened and simplified.

Future recommendations : considering that ETC has proved its effectiveness, Members considered that its potential should be further developed – in areas such as the single market, the digital agenda, employment, mobility, energy, research, education, culture, health and the environment.

The Member States and the Commission were called upon to:

consider preserving ETC as an important instrument, allocating it a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020 and significantly increasing its budget ; exchange information and good practices in order to reduce the administrative burden on beneficiaries prior to the ETC legislative proposal and the programming of the Interreg programmes for the period after 2020; pay attention to small cross-border cooperation projects between neighbouring border areas; promote cross-border cooperation between mountainous border areas , with rural areas prioritise; include cultural cooperation as one of the objectives of European territorial cooperation; consider the proposal by the Luxembourg Presidency on the creation of a new legal instrument for cohesion policy post-2020; initiate in 2016 a structured multi-stakeholder debate at EU level on the future of ETC post-2020; promote the role that the EGTC can play as a tool for greater efficiency in meeting local needs in cross-border regions.

Lastly, Parliament encouraged the joint establishment of strategies for border areas in order to boost integrated and sustainable territorial development.

Documents
2016/09/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/09/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/06/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Iskra MIHAYLOVA (ADLE, BG) on European Territorial Cooperation - best practices and innovative measures.

European Added Value of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) : the report noted that the ETC budget of EUR 10.1 billion represents 2.8 % of the cohesion policy budget, does not match the great challenges that ETC has to meet, and does not reflect the high level of its European added value.

However, transnational cooperation:

has helped in terms of supporting research, innovation and the knowledge economy, adapting to climate change, and promoting sustainable transport and mobility through transnational approaches, and has contributed to enhancing institutional capacity; has allowed cities and regions to cooperate on a variety of issues and themes, involving exchange of experience and good practices, and that this has improved the effectiveness of many regional and local policies.

Members called on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to work together and exchange information and good practices in order to undertake assessments and issue guidelines as to how results orientation can be adapted to ETC specificities. The report also called for structured monitoring systems and evaluation plans in order to better evaluate the achievements of the results in terms of the Europe 2020 goals and territorial integration.

Contribution to territorial cohesion : Members encouraged the Member States to make greater use of Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) and Community-Led Local Development (CLLD), which are not implemented widely enough in the Interreg programmes for 2014-2020. They recommend that special focus be placed on:

projects that strive to adapt localities and regions to the new demographic situation and counteract the inequalities resulting from it; the use of the Funds in island regions, outermost regions, sparsely populated regions and mountain and rural areas; the use of Interreg programmes and their urgent implementation in order to respond to, among other things, the challenges of tackling the refugee crisis.

Support for research and innovation : the report stressed the need to create cross-border innovation policy approaches, such as joint research and mobility programmes, joint research infrastructures, partnerships and cooperation networks. It recommended that local and regional authorities take full advantage of the possibilities of combining those funds to support SMEs and research and innovation projects, including cross-border projects.

Governance and policy coordination : while welcoming the simplified EGTC Regulation ( Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 ), Members stressed that this regulation is not sufficient to overcome all existing legal obstacles to cross-border cooperation. They welcomed, therefore, the initiative of the Luxembourg Presidency, which proposed a specific legal tool for border regions, as well as the Commission’s initiative of carrying out, by the end of 2016, an analysis of the barriers to cross-border cooperation that will look at solutions and examples of good practices.

Stressing the ever increasing importance of cross-border labour markets , Members called on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the opportunities provided by the Interreg programmes to facilitate cross-border labour mobility.

Simplification : Members stressed that the implementation of territorial cooperation programmes should be further simplified. They called on the Commission to propose specific actions to simplify the rules on reporting, auditing and state aid and to harmonise procedures. Arrangements for involving civil society and private stakeholders must be broadened and simplified.

Future recommendations : considering that ETC has proved its effectiveness, Members considered that its potential should be further developed – in areas such as the single market, the digital agenda, employment, mobility, energy, research, education, culture , health and the environment.

The Member States and the Commission are called upon to:

consider preserving ETC as an important instrument, allocating it a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020 and significantly increasing its budget ; exchange information and good practices in order to reduce the administrative burden on beneficiaries prior to the ETC legislative proposal and the programming of the Interreg programmes for the period after 2020; pay attention to small cross-border cooperation projects between neighbouring border areas; promote cross-border cooperation between mountainous border areas , with rural areas prioritise; include cultural cooperation as one of the objectives of European territorial cooperation; consider the proposal by the Luxembourg Presidency on the creation of a new legal instrument for cohesion policy post-2020; initiate in 2016 a structured multi-stakeholder debate at EU level on the future of ETC post-2020; promote the role that the EGTC can play as a tool for greater efficiency in meeting local needs in cross-border regions.

Lastly, the report encouraged the joint establishment of strategies for border areas in order to boost integrated and sustainable territorial development.

Documents
2016/05/24
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/04/06
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/02/24
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/10/29
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/07/14
   EP - MIHAYLOVA Iskra (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0202/2016 - Iskra Mihaylova - Vote unique #

2016/09/13 Outcome: +: 523, -: 76, 0: 38
DE IT ES PL RO FR AT CZ SE NL BE BG PT DK IE FI LT SK HR SI EL MT LV EE GB CY LU HU
Total
77
66
46
45
30
66
17
20
18
21
16
13
15
11
10
10
9
12
8
8
20
6
6
5
61
4
4
13
icon: PPE PPE
188

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
161

Netherlands S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
34

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
182 2015/2280(INI)
2016/04/06 REGI 182 amendments...
source: 580.570

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-09-12-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/3
name
JUARISTI ABAUNZ Josu
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.064
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-577064_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.570
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-580570_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2016-06-09T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0202_EN.html title: A8-0202/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-06-09T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0202_EN.html title: A8-0202/2016
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160912&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2016-09-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0321_EN.html title: T8-0321/2016
summary
events/5
date
2016-09-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0321_EN.html title: T8-0321/2016
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra date: 2015-07-14T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2015-07-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
docs/2/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0202&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0202_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0321
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0321_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: S&D name: DĂNCILĂ Viorica group: ECR name: PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr group: GUE/NGL name: JUARISTI ABAUNZ Josu group: Verts/ALE name: ROPĖ Bronis group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2015-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra
  • date: 2016-05-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: S&D name: DĂNCILĂ Viorica group: ECR name: PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr group: GUE/NGL name: JUARISTI ABAUNZ Josu group: Verts/ALE name: ROPĖ Bronis group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2015-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0202&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0202/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-09-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160912&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-09-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0321 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0321/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2015-07-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
REGI
date
2015-07-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra
docs
  • date: 2016-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.064 title: PE577.064 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.570 title: PE580.570 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27328&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)876 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0202&language=EN title: A8-0202/2016 summary: The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Iskra MIHAYLOVA (ADLE, BG) on European Territorial Cooperation - best practices and innovative measures. European Added Value of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) : the report noted that the ETC budget of EUR 10.1 billion represents 2.8 % of the cohesion policy budget, does not match the great challenges that ETC has to meet, and does not reflect the high level of its European added value. However, transnational cooperation: has helped in terms of supporting research, innovation and the knowledge economy, adapting to climate change, and promoting sustainable transport and mobility through transnational approaches, and has contributed to enhancing institutional capacity; has allowed cities and regions to cooperate on a variety of issues and themes, involving exchange of experience and good practices, and that this has improved the effectiveness of many regional and local policies. Members called on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to work together and exchange information and good practices in order to undertake assessments and issue guidelines as to how results orientation can be adapted to ETC specificities. The report also called for structured monitoring systems and evaluation plans in order to better evaluate the achievements of the results in terms of the Europe 2020 goals and territorial integration. Contribution to territorial cohesion : Members encouraged the Member States to make greater use of Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) and Community-Led Local Development (CLLD), which are not implemented widely enough in the Interreg programmes for 2014-2020. They recommend that special focus be placed on: projects that strive to adapt localities and regions to the new demographic situation and counteract the inequalities resulting from it; the use of the Funds in island regions, outermost regions, sparsely populated regions and mountain and rural areas; the use of Interreg programmes and their urgent implementation in order to respond to, among other things, the challenges of tackling the refugee crisis. Support for research and innovation : the report stressed the need to create cross-border innovation policy approaches, such as joint research and mobility programmes, joint research infrastructures, partnerships and cooperation networks. It recommended that local and regional authorities take full advantage of the possibilities of combining those funds to support SMEs and research and innovation projects, including cross-border projects. Governance and policy coordination : while welcoming the simplified EGTC Regulation ( Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 ), Members stressed that this regulation is not sufficient to overcome all existing legal obstacles to cross-border cooperation. They welcomed, therefore, the initiative of the Luxembourg Presidency, which proposed a specific legal tool for border regions, as well as the Commission’s initiative of carrying out, by the end of 2016, an analysis of the barriers to cross-border cooperation that will look at solutions and examples of good practices. Stressing the ever increasing importance of cross-border labour markets , Members called on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the opportunities provided by the Interreg programmes to facilitate cross-border labour mobility. Simplification : Members stressed that the implementation of territorial cooperation programmes should be further simplified. They called on the Commission to propose specific actions to simplify the rules on reporting, auditing and state aid and to harmonise procedures. Arrangements for involving civil society and private stakeholders must be broadened and simplified. Future recommendations : considering that ETC has proved its effectiveness, Members considered that its potential should be further developed – in areas such as the single market, the digital agenda, employment, mobility, energy, research, education, culture , health and the environment. The Member States and the Commission are called upon to: consider preserving ETC as an important instrument, allocating it a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020 and significantly increasing its budget ; exchange information and good practices in order to reduce the administrative burden on beneficiaries prior to the ETC legislative proposal and the programming of the Interreg programmes for the period after 2020; pay attention to small cross-border cooperation projects between neighbouring border areas; promote cross-border cooperation between mountainous border areas , with rural areas prioritise; include cultural cooperation as one of the objectives of European territorial cooperation; consider the proposal by the Luxembourg Presidency on the creation of a new legal instrument for cohesion policy post-2020; initiate in 2016 a structured multi-stakeholder debate at EU level on the future of ETC post-2020; promote the role that the EGTC can play as a tool for greater efficiency in meeting local needs in cross-border regions. Lastly, the report encouraged the joint establishment of strategies for border areas in order to boost integrated and sustainable territorial development.
  • date: 2016-09-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160912&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-09-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27328&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-09-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0321 title: T8-0321/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 523 votes to 76 with 38 abstentions, a resolution on European Territorial Cooperation - best practices and innovative measures. European Added Value of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC ): whilst recalling that around 38 % of Europe’s population lives in border regions , Parliament noted that the ETC budget of EUR 10.1 billion represents 2.8 % of the cohesion policy budget, does not match the great challenges that ETC has to meet, and does not reflect the high level of its European added value. Members called for greater respect for Article 174 TFEU on territorial cohesion, in particular as regards rural areas and areas affected by industrial transition, and regions that suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps. They acknowledged that cross-border cooperation (CBC) is a key tool for the development of border regions: it has helped in terms of supporting research , innovation and the knowledge economy, adapting to climate change, and promoting sustainable transport and mobility through transnational approaches; it is particularly important for the protection of the environment, especially in the areas of water, biodiversity and energy; it has allowed cities and regions to cooperate on a variety of issues and themes, involving exchange of experience and good practices, and makes a geographical area more attractive for trading companies; it offers significant European added value, contributing to peace, stability and regional integration, and can bring added value to the management of the migration crisis . Members called on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to work together and exchange information and good practices in order to undertake assessments and issue guidelines as to how results orientation can be adapted to ETC specificities. The report also called for structured monitoring systems and evaluation plans in order to better evaluate the achievements of the results in terms of the Europe 2020 goals and territorial integration. Contribution to territorial cohesion : Members encouraged the Member States to make greater use of Integrated Territorial Investment ( ITI ) and Community-Led Local Development ( CLLD ), which are not implemented widely enough in the Interreg programmes for 2014-2020. They recommend that special focus be placed on projects giving priority to: the adaptation of social and mobility infrastructure to demographic change and migratory flows; the creation of specific goods and services aimed at an ageing population; support for job opportunities for older people, women and migrants that contribute to social inclusion; enhanced digital connections and the creation of platforms that enable and foster the participation of the citizens of more isolated regions and their interaction with the various administrative, social and political services. Support for research and innovation : Parliament stressed the need to create cross-border innovation policy approaches, such as joint research and mobility programmes, joint research infrastructures, partnerships and cooperation networks. It recommended that local and regional authorities take full advantage of the possibilities of combining those funds ( European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI), Horizon 2020, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), etc.) to support SMEs and research and innovation projects, including cross-border projects. Governance and policy coordination : while welcoming the simplified EGTC Regulation ( Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 ), Members stressed that this regulation is not sufficient to overcome all existing legal obstacles to cross-border cooperation. They welcomed, therefore, the initiative of the Luxembourg Presidency, which proposed a specific legal tool for border regions, as well as the Commission’s initiative of carrying out, by the end of 2016, an analysis of the barriers to cross-border cooperation that will look at solutions and examples of good practices. Stressing the ever-increasing importance of cross-border labour markets , Members called on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the opportunities provided by the Interreg programmes to facilitate cross-border labour mobility. Simplification : Members called on the Commission to propose specific actions to simplify the rules on reporting, auditing and state aid and to harmonise procedures. Arrangements for involving civil society and private stakeholders must be broadened and simplified. Future recommendations : considering that ETC has proved its effectiveness, Members considered that its potential should be further developed – in areas such as the single market, the digital agenda, employment, mobility, energy, research, education, culture, health and the environment. The Member States and the Commission were called upon to: consider preserving ETC as an important instrument, allocating it a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020 and significantly increasing its budget ; exchange information and good practices in order to reduce the administrative burden on beneficiaries prior to the ETC legislative proposal and the programming of the Interreg programmes for the period after 2020; pay attention to small cross-border cooperation projects between neighbouring border areas; promote cross-border cooperation between mountainous border areas , with rural areas prioritise; include cultural cooperation as one of the objectives of European territorial cooperation; consider the proposal by the Luxembourg Presidency on the creation of a new legal instrument for cohesion policy post-2020; initiate in 2016 a structured multi-stakeholder debate at EU level on the future of ETC post-2020; promote the role that the EGTC can play as a tool for greater efficiency in meeting local needs in cross-border regions. Lastly, Parliament encouraged the joint establishment of strategies for border areas in order to boost integrated and sustainable territorial development.
  • date: 2016-09-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
REGI/8/04828
New
  • REGI/8/04828
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.70.05 Regional cooperation, transfrontier cooperation
New
4.70.05
Regional cooperation, cross-border cooperation
activities/4
date
2016-09-13T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0321 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0321/2016
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160912&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4
date
2016-09-13T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Iskra MIHAYLOVA (ADLE, BG) on European Territorial Cooperation - best practices and innovative measures.

    European Added Value of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC): the report noted that the ETC budget of EUR 10.1 billion represents 2.8 % of the cohesion policy budget, does not match the great challenges that ETC has to meet, and does not reflect the high level of its European added value.

    However, transnational cooperation:

    • has helped in terms of supporting research, innovation and the knowledge economy, adapting to climate change, and promoting sustainable transport and mobility through transnational approaches, and has contributed to enhancing institutional capacity;
    • has allowed cities and regions to cooperate on a variety of issues and themes, involving exchange of experience and good practices, and that this has improved the effectiveness of many regional and local policies.

    Members called on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to work together and exchange information and good practices in order to undertake assessments and issue guidelines as to how results orientation can be adapted to ETC specificities. The report also called for structured monitoring systems and evaluation plans in order to better evaluate the achievements of the results in terms of the Europe 2020 goals and territorial integration.

    Contribution to territorial cohesion: Members encouraged the Member States to make greater use of Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) and Community-Led Local Development (CLLD), which are not implemented widely enough in the Interreg programmes for 2014-2020. They recommend that special focus be placed on:

    • projects that strive to adapt localities and regions to the new demographic situation and counteract the inequalities resulting from it;
    • the use of the Funds in island regions, outermost regions, sparsely populated regions and mountain and rural areas;
    • the use of Interreg programmes and their urgent implementation in order to respond to, among other things, the challenges of tackling the refugee crisis.

    Support for research and innovation: the report stressed the need to create cross-border innovation policy approaches, such as joint research and mobility programmes, joint research infrastructures, partnerships and cooperation networks. It recommended that local and regional authorities take full advantage of the possibilities of combining those funds to support SMEs and research and innovation projects, including cross-border projects.

    Governance and policy coordination: while welcoming the simplified EGTC Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013), Members stressed that this regulation is not sufficient to overcome all existing legal obstacles to cross-border cooperation. They welcomed, therefore, the initiative of the Luxembourg Presidency, which proposed a specific legal tool for border regions, as well as the Commission’s initiative of carrying out, by the end of 2016, an analysis of the barriers to cross-border cooperation that will look at solutions and examples of good practices.

    Stressing the ever increasing importance of cross-border labour markets, Members called on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the opportunities provided by the Interreg programmes to facilitate cross-border labour mobility.

    Simplification: Members stressed that the implementation of territorial cooperation programmes should be further simplified. They called on the Commission to propose specific actions to simplify the rules on reporting, auditing and state aid and to harmonise procedures. Arrangements for involving civil society and private stakeholders must be broadened and simplified.

    Future recommendations: considering that ETC has proved its effectiveness, Members considered that its potential should be further developed – in areas such as the single market, the digital agenda, employment, mobility, energy, research, education, culture , health and the environment.

    The Member States and the Commission are called upon to:

    • consider preserving ETC as an important instrument, allocating it a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020 and significantly increasing its budget;
    • exchange information and good practices in order to reduce the administrative burden on beneficiaries prior to the ETC legislative proposal and the programming of the Interreg programmes for the period after 2020;
    • pay attention to small cross-border cooperation projects between neighbouring border areas;
    • promote cross-border cooperation between mountainous border areas, with rural areas prioritise;
    • include cultural cooperation as one of the objectives of European territorial cooperation;
    • consider the proposal by the Luxembourg Presidency on the creation of a new legal instrument for cohesion policy post-2020;
    • initiate in 2016 a structured multi-stakeholder debate at EU level on the future of ETC post-2020;
    • promote the role that the EGTC can play as a tool for greater efficiency in meeting local needs in cross-border regions.

    Lastly, the report encouraged the joint establishment of strategies for border areas in order to boost integrated and sustainable territorial development.

activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0202&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0202/2016
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4
date
2016-09-13T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2
date
2016-06-09T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/date
Old
2016-07-04T00:00:00
New
2016-09-12T00:00:00
activities/1
date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: S&D name: DĂNCILĂ Viorica group: ECR name: PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr group: GUE/NGL name: JUARISTI ABAUNZ Josu group: Verts/ALE name: ROPĖ Bronis group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2015-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/1/date
Old
2016-06-22T00:00:00
New
2016-07-04T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
JUARISTI ABAUNZ Josu
committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
JUARISTI ABAUNZ Josu
activities/1/date
Old
2016-05-25T00:00:00
New
2016-06-22T00:00:00
activities/1
date
2016-05-25T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: S&D name: DĂNCILĂ Viorica group: ECR name: PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr group: Verts/ALE name: ROPĖ Bronis group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2015-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: HETMAN Krzysztof group: S&D name: DĂNCILĂ Viorica group: ECR name: PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr group: Verts/ALE name: ROPĖ Bronis group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2015-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
REGI/8/04828
reference
2015/2280(INI)
title
European territorial cooperation - best practices and innovative measures
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
4.70.05 Regional cooperation, transfrontier cooperation