BETA


Events

2017/08/31
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/02/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/02/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 663 votes to 16, with 13 abstentions, a resolution on control of the Register and composition of the Commission’s expert groups.

Parliament welcomed the Commission Decision of 30 May 2016 establishing horizontal rules on the creation and operation of Commission’s expert groups. It reiterated the importance of reviving forms of involvement of representatives of civil society and the social partners in crucial areas.

Reform of the system : Parliament recalled that a lack of transparency has a negative effect on the trust that EU citizens have in the EU institutions. In this regard, it called for the effective reform of the Commission’s expert group system, based on clear principles of transparency and balanced composition.

Selection of experts : Parliament took the view that the entire selection process should guarantee a high level of transparency and should be governed by clearer, more concise criteria, with particular emphasis on candidates’ practical experience , alongside their academic qualifications, and on possible conflicts of interest the experts might have. It also welcomed the fact that a connection has already been established between the Register of Commission Expert Groups and the Transparency Register, thus ensuring improved transparency.

The Commission is asked to:

make progress towards a more balanced composition of the expert groups and make it clear, in the public call for application, how it defines a balanced composition and which interests (economic and non-economic) it seeks to be represented when the expert groups are established; investigate whether a new complaints mechanism is required, if the definition of balanced composition is contested by interested stakeholders or whether current arrangements are adequate, Parliament should be associated in this control mechanism; explore ways to facilitate and encourage the participation of underrepresented organisations or social groups in expert groups (e.g. experts representing SMEs, consumers, trade unions); assess the development of an allowance system that supports underrepresented groups in acquiring the necessary expertise; make it possible for European non-governmental organisations to be represented in the expert groups by representatives of their national member organisations, when provided with a clear mandate from the European organisations; provide for the meetings and minutes to be made public ; develop specific guidelines explaining how it interprets the provision that the minutes of the expert groups should be meaningful and complete; devote sufficient resources to the activities relating to the Register.

Lastly, Members noted that the Commission has stated that by the end of 2016, the new framework for Commission expert groups will have to be implemented by all Directorates-General. They requested the Commission to submit to Parliament a report on the implementation and evaluation at the latest one year after the adoption of the Decision, i.e. before 1 June 2017.

Documents
2017/02/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/02/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/01/12
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the own-initiative report by Dennis de JONG (GUE/NGL, NL) on control of the Register and composition of the Commission’s expert groups.

The Committee on Legal Affairs, exercising its prerogative as an associated committee in accordance with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure, also gave its opinion on the report.

Members welcomed the Commission Decision of 30 May 2016 establishing horizontal rules on the creation and operation of Commission’s expert groups.

Through the adoption of the new horizontal rules, many concerns previously expressed by Parliament have seemingly been met, in particular those concerning the need for public calls for applications for the selection of the members of expert groups and concerning the revision of the Register of Commission expert groups and the creation of synergy between this Register, the Transparency Register of the Commission and Parliament, and those rules relating to the need to avoid conflicts of interest.

Reform of the system : Members considered that the effective reform of the Commission's expert groups system, based on clear principles of transparency and balanced composition , will improve the availability and reliability of data, which will in turn help increase people's trust in the EU. They reiterated the importance of reviving forms of involvement of representatives of civil society and the social partners in crucial areas such as the transparency and the functioning of the European institutions.

Selection of experts : noting that transparency and coordination of interinstitutional activities are of paramount importance, Members welcomed the fact that the selection process is now taking place publicly. They stressed that it needs to be clearly visible what practical experience and qualifications the experts possess.

Moreover, new rules should apply strictly and equally to all Commission expert groups, irrespective of their title to ensure a balanced representation through participation of representatives of all stakeholders.

According to the report, the Commission is asked to:

make progress towards a more balanced composition of the expert groups; when creating new expert groups , state clearly in the public call for applications how it defines a balanced composition, which interests it seeks to be represented, and why; investigate whether a new complaints mechanism is required, if the definition of balanced composition is contested by interested stakeholders or whether current arrangements are adequate, Parliament should be associated in this control mechanism; explore ways to facilitate and encourage the participation of underrepresented organisations or social groups in expert groups (e.g. experts representing SMEs, consumers, trade unions); assess the development of an allowance system that supports underrepresented groups in acquiring the necessary expertise; make it possible for European non-governmental organisations to be represented in the expert groups by representatives of their national member organisations, when provided with a clear mandate from the European organisations; provide for the meetings and minutes to be made public ; develop specific guidelines explaining how it interprets the provision that the minutes of the expert groups should be meaningful and complete; devote sufficient resources to the activities relating to the Register.

Lastly, Members noted that the Commission has stated that by the end of 2016, the new framework for Commission expert groups will have to be implemented by all Directorates-General. They requested the Commission to submit to Parliament a report on the implementation and evaluation at the latest one year after the adoption of the Decision, i.e. before 1 June 2017.

Documents
2017/01/09
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2016/11/29
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/09/09
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/07/05
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/04/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/03/15
   EP - KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2015/12/03
   EP - TRÜPEL Helga (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2015/11/26
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2015/11/26
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2015/11/25
   EP - DE JONG Dennis (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in CONT

Documents

Votes

A8-0002/2017 - Dennis de Jong - Vote unique

2017/02/14 Outcome: +: 663, -: 16, 0: 13
DE FR IT ES GB PL RO PT CZ BE HU AT BG SE NL FI EL SK HR DK LT IE LV SI LU EE CY MT
Total
90
70
64
50
52
50
30
21
20
20
20
18
16
18
25
13
20
12
11
11
10
10
8
8
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
209

Sweden PPE

For (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
172

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
26

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
40

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
97 2015/2319(INI)
2016/03/08 BUDG 13 amendments...
source: 578.735
2016/09/09 CONT 57 amendments...
source: 589.101
2016/09/30 JURI 27 amendments...
source: 589.484

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: DE JONG Dennis date: 2015-11-25T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2015-11-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DE JONG Dennis group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga date: 2015-12-03T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2015-12-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
docs/4/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0002&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0002_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0021
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0021_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-11-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek group: ALDE name: DLABAJOVÁ Martina group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael group: EFD name: VALLI Marco responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2015-11-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne
  • date: 2017-01-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2015-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek group: ALDE name: DLABAJOVÁ Martina group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael group: EFD name: VALLI Marco responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2015-11-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne
  • date: 2017-01-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0002&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0002/2017 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2017-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-02-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0021 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0021/2017 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Secretariat-General commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2015-11-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DE JONG Dennis group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2015-12-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2015-12-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2015-11-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: S&D name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne
docs
  • date: 2016-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.859&secondRef=02 title: PE576.859 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-07-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.223 title: PE575.223 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.101 title: PE589.101 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.119&secondRef=02 title: PE589.119 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2017-08-31T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=28071&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)358 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-11-26T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-11-26T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2017-01-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-01-12T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0002&language=EN title: A8-0002/2017 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the own-initiative report by Dennis de JONG (GUE/NGL, NL) on control of the Register and composition of the Commission’s expert groups. The Committee on Legal Affairs, exercising its prerogative as an associated committee in accordance with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure, also gave its opinion on the report. Members welcomed the Commission Decision of 30 May 2016 establishing horizontal rules on the creation and operation of Commission’s expert groups. Through the adoption of the new horizontal rules, many concerns previously expressed by Parliament have seemingly been met, in particular those concerning the need for public calls for applications for the selection of the members of expert groups and concerning the revision of the Register of Commission expert groups and the creation of synergy between this Register, the Transparency Register of the Commission and Parliament, and those rules relating to the need to avoid conflicts of interest. Reform of the system : Members considered that the effective reform of the Commission's expert groups system, based on clear principles of transparency and balanced composition , will improve the availability and reliability of data, which will in turn help increase people's trust in the EU. They reiterated the importance of reviving forms of involvement of representatives of civil society and the social partners in crucial areas such as the transparency and the functioning of the European institutions. Selection of experts : noting that transparency and coordination of interinstitutional activities are of paramount importance, Members welcomed the fact that the selection process is now taking place publicly. They stressed that it needs to be clearly visible what practical experience and qualifications the experts possess. Moreover, new rules should apply strictly and equally to all Commission expert groups, irrespective of their title to ensure a balanced representation through participation of representatives of all stakeholders. According to the report, the Commission is asked to: make progress towards a more balanced composition of the expert groups; when creating new expert groups , state clearly in the public call for applications how it defines a balanced composition, which interests it seeks to be represented, and why; investigate whether a new complaints mechanism is required, if the definition of balanced composition is contested by interested stakeholders or whether current arrangements are adequate, Parliament should be associated in this control mechanism; explore ways to facilitate and encourage the participation of underrepresented organisations or social groups in expert groups (e.g. experts representing SMEs, consumers, trade unions); assess the development of an allowance system that supports underrepresented groups in acquiring the necessary expertise; make it possible for European non-governmental organisations to be represented in the expert groups by representatives of their national member organisations, when provided with a clear mandate from the European organisations; provide for the meetings and minutes to be made public ; develop specific guidelines explaining how it interprets the provision that the minutes of the expert groups should be meaningful and complete; devote sufficient resources to the activities relating to the Register. Lastly, Members noted that the Commission has stated that by the end of 2016, the new framework for Commission expert groups will have to be implemented by all Directorates-General. They requested the Commission to submit to Parliament a report on the implementation and evaluation at the latest one year after the adoption of the Decision, i.e. before 1 June 2017.
  • date: 2017-02-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170213&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-02-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=28071&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-02-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0021 title: T8-0021/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 663 votes to 16, with 13 abstentions, a resolution on control of the Register and composition of the Commission’s expert groups. Parliament welcomed the Commission Decision of 30 May 2016 establishing horizontal rules on the creation and operation of Commission’s expert groups. It reiterated the importance of reviving forms of involvement of representatives of civil society and the social partners in crucial areas. Reform of the system : Parliament recalled that a lack of transparency has a negative effect on the trust that EU citizens have in the EU institutions. In this regard, it called for the effective reform of the Commission’s expert group system, based on clear principles of transparency and balanced composition. Selection of experts : Parliament took the view that the entire selection process should guarantee a high level of transparency and should be governed by clearer, more concise criteria, with particular emphasis on candidates’ practical experience , alongside their academic qualifications, and on possible conflicts of interest the experts might have. It also welcomed the fact that a connection has already been established between the Register of Commission Expert Groups and the Transparency Register, thus ensuring improved transparency. The Commission is asked to: make progress towards a more balanced composition of the expert groups and make it clear, in the public call for application, how it defines a balanced composition and which interests (economic and non-economic) it seeks to be represented when the expert groups are established; investigate whether a new complaints mechanism is required, if the definition of balanced composition is contested by interested stakeholders or whether current arrangements are adequate, Parliament should be associated in this control mechanism; explore ways to facilitate and encourage the participation of underrepresented organisations or social groups in expert groups (e.g. experts representing SMEs, consumers, trade unions); assess the development of an allowance system that supports underrepresented groups in acquiring the necessary expertise; make it possible for European non-governmental organisations to be represented in the expert groups by representatives of their national member organisations, when provided with a clear mandate from the European organisations; provide for the meetings and minutes to be made public ; develop specific guidelines explaining how it interprets the provision that the minutes of the expert groups should be meaningful and complete; devote sufficient resources to the activities relating to the Register. Lastly, Members noted that the Commission has stated that by the end of 2016, the new framework for Commission expert groups will have to be implemented by all Directorates-General. They requested the Commission to submit to Parliament a report on the implementation and evaluation at the latest one year after the adoption of the Decision, i.e. before 1 June 2017.
  • date: 2017-02-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat-General commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/8/05053
New
  • CONT/8/05053
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.40.03 European Commission
  • 8.40.10 Interinstitutional relations, democratic deficit, subsidiarity, comitology
  • 8.70.03 Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
New
8.40.03
European Commission
8.40.10
Interinstitutional relations, subsidiarity, proportionality, comitology
8.70.03
Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0002&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0002/2017
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4
date
2017-02-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0021 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0021/2017
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
other/0/commissioner
Old
JUNCKER Jean-Claude
New
TIMMERMANS Frans
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2
date
2017-01-12T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1
date
2017-01-09T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/1/date
Old
2017-02-02T00:00:00
New
2017-02-13T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/1
group
S&D
name
VAUGHAN Derek
activities/1/date
Old
2016-11-30T00:00:00
New
2017-02-02T00:00:00
committees/1/shadows/1
group
S&D
name
VAUGHAN Derek
activities/1/date
Old
2016-11-21T00:00:00
New
2016-11-30T00:00:00
activities/1/date
Old
2016-11-30T00:00:00
New
2016-11-21T00:00:00
activities/1/date
Old
2016-10-27T00:00:00
New
2016-11-30T00:00:00
activities/1
date
2016-10-27T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/2/date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne
committees/2/date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
THEURER Michael
committees/1/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
THEURER Michael
activities/1
date
2016-07-04T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1
date
2016-07-04T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
DLABAJOVÁ Martina
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/2
group
EFD
name
VALLI Marco
committees/1/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
DLABAJOVÁ Martina
committees/1/shadows/2
group
EFD
name
VALLI Marco
activities/0/committees/0/date
2015-12-03T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga
committees/0/date
2015-12-03T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga
activities/0
date
2015-11-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/8/05053
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
    • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2015-11-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs (Associated committee) committee: JURI
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat-General commissioner: JUNCKER Jean-Claude
    procedure
    reference
    2015/2319(INI)
    title
    Control of the Register and composition of the Commission's expert groups
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject