BETA


Events

2017/01/23
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/07/05
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/07/05
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 486 votes to 189, with 28 abstentions, a resolution on refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market.

Parliament stressed the need for the EU to base its immediate response to the situation on solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as stated in Article 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and on a holistic approach that takes into account the need to improve safe and legal migration channels.

Taking note of the high degree of heterogeneity and lack of clarity in the use of the term refugee in the public and political discourse, Parliament stressed the importance of making a clear differentiation between refugee and economic migrant for the purposes of implementing the various European and international policies.

It stressed that significant differences exist in the times and modalities of processing requests for international protection within Member States and highlighted that slow and excessively bureaucratic procedures may hinder refugees and asylum seekers’ access to education and training, employment guidance and the labour market, the activation of EU and Member States' programmes, and the effective and coordinated use of funds in this field, as well as increase the refugees and asylum seekers' vulnerability to undeclared work and precarious working conditions. It called for an approach, which prescribes appropriate adaptation and presupposes cooperation, and to address a range of serious and multi-faceted issues.

Parliament rejected the idea of creating special labour markets for refugees but advocated that the respective national minimum wage should also remain valid for refugees. It emphasised the benefits of education on social inclusion and integration into the labour market and stressed the importance of guaranteeing all refugees, in particular girls and women, access to formal, informal and non-formal education and long-life training, combined with work experience. It also stressed the importance of a tailor-made integration approach based on equal opportunities.

It called on the Member States to establish a language training system , closely linking general and vocational language training.

Challenges and opportunities : Parliament called for measures to facilitate effective access for refugees and asylum seekers to housing, health care, education, social protection and the labour market, in order to restore their human dignity and self-worth. It recalled that the Qualifications Directive and the Reception Conditions Directive provides for the right of access to the labour market and to vocational training, both for asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection.

It highlighted the fact that labour market conditions within host countries is one of the determining factors when it comes to ensuring sustainable and successful integration of refugees .

The Commission and the Member States should continue to prioritise policies and investments aimed at providing quality employment for the whole of society, with a particular focus on the most vulnerable people, and on economic growth. Members pointed to the major disparities in social and economic circumstances within the EU. They should be taken into account when refugees are relocated, in order to maximise their labour-market integration prospects.

Parliament called on the Member States to ensure that welcoming refugees goes hand-in-hand with a solid integration policy , such as language and orientation courses, that provide comprehensive insights into fundamental EU rights and values and social inclusiveness.

From a budgetary point of view, Parliament highlighted the fact that public spending, covering extraordinary investments in social inclusion and labour-market integration measures and programmes, are likely to have a positive effect on national GDPs in the short term, while medium- or long-term impacts on public finances will depend on the effectiveness of these measures. It stressed that the main EU funds available for social inclusion and integration into the labour market, in particular the European Social Fund (ESF), the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Fund for Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD), have different focuses, target groups and management modes at Member State level. However, Parliament stated that, as these funds are insufficient , increased public investment and additional resources are required in order to provide, as a matter of priority, local authorities, social partners, social and economic actors, civil society and volunteer organisations with direct financial support for measures aimed at facilitating swift integration of refugees and asylum seekers into society and the labour market (the AMIF has already used up all its resources).

In addition, Parliament highlighted that integration and inclusion measures aimed at refugees and asylum seekers should not draw on financial resources destined for programmes targeting other disadvantaged groups, but necessarily require additional social investments reflecting the need for additional measures. It called, therefore, on the Commission to consider introducing a minimum share of 25 % of the cohesion policy budget for the ESF Fund in the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) , in order to ensure adequate resources for labour market integration in the long term. More generally, Parliament called on the Council, in the context of the forthcoming revision of the MFF, to adjust the ceilings for total allocations and for the individual headings to take account of the internal and external challenges which have arisen in connection with the refugee crisis, and to bring them into line with the needs of the Member States facing greatest integration challenge.

Making integration work : Parliament is convinced that integrating refugees into the labour market will be difficult without active, large-scale support from microenterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU. It expressed support for the Commission’s efforts in updating the European Agenda on Migration, in particular by revising the Dublin III Regulation in order to improve solidarity, responsibility-sharing and the harmonisation of protection standards among Member States. However, further efforts are necessary to create a truly uniform Common European Asylum System, and a comprehensive and sustainable legal migration policy in the EU that meets labour market demands in terms of skills, in which social inclusion and active integration policies play a central role. The Commission should do more to ensure that existing rules are fully and effectively implemented.

Parliament also regretted that the agreement, adopted in September 2015, on sharing refugees among the Member States is not being implemented satisfactorily. It stressed that the quotas for receiving refugees are not being met in the majority of the Member States.

In a series of amendments adopted in plenary, Parliament welcomed the establishment of a ‘Skills Profile Tool’ for third-country nationals in the framework of the Commission’s ‘New skills agenda for Europe’, aimed at strengthening early identification and documentation of the skills and qualifications of third-country nationals, introducing a guide on best practices to support labour market integration in Member States and improving online language learning for newly arrived refugees and asylum seekers through the Erasmus + online language courses. Parliament also welcomed the Commission’s ‘Action Plan on the integration of third country nationals’, addressing pre-departure and pre-arrival measures, education, employment and vocational training, access to basic services, active participation and social inclusion.

Recommendations and best practices : the resolution made a series of recommendations to facilitate labour market integration of refugees.

Parliament called on the Member States to:

ensure swift and full labour-market integration and social inclusion of refugees, in accordance with the principle of equal treatment, the national labour market situation and EU and national legislation; shorten the processing time of applications for international protection; ensure early, easy and equal access for refugees and asylum seekers to training, including internships and apprenticeships, in order to ensure rapid, effective and full integration into our societies and the labour market; set up dedicated platforms and multilingual internet portals aimed at providing concise and easily accessible information about recognition possibilities, existing integration programmes and lists of the institutions responsible, recalling that every EU and EEA Member State has a designated National Academic Recognition Information Centre, which provides a way to compare academic qualifications; facilitate the sharing of the experience and practices accumulated at city level to promote inclusive labour markets for all residents, including beneficiaries of international protection, and to involve cities and local authorities in the design and implementation of social and economic inclusion policies.

As for the Commission, it is called upon to:

consider a targeted revision of the Reception Conditions Directive in order to ensure that applicants of international protection have access to the labour market as soon as possible after their applications were lodged ; promote upward convergence of social protection standards and a swift delivery of work permits in the Member States; intensify its efforts to ensure that refugees and asylum seekers are granted effective access to the labour market, in particular by verifying that Member States do not impose too restrictive conditions for access to employment; consider a revision of the Blue Card Directive ; combat all forms of discrimination, xenophobia and racism by raising awareness of anti-discrimination laws, by supporting local authorities, civil society organisations, social partners and National Equality Bodies in their work; enhance the dialogue with social partners, based on a balanced representation of interests, with a view to identifying labour market and employment opportunities for refugees; provide financial support to transnational schemes ensuring the transferability and adaptability of good practices – such as the peer-to-peer mentoring and coaching projects involving all levels of governance and multiple stakeholders, designed and implemented by different stakeholders at EU level.

Parliament called for monies to be redeployed as quickly as possible within the ESF, the AMIF, the ERDF and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) so that those Member States bearing the brunt of the refugee crisis are given more effective support.

Culture, education and sport : Parliament stressed the urgent need to ensure that unaccompanied minors receive particular protection from exploitation at work, violence and trafficking. It called on the Commission to increase the profile of culture, education and training in those operational measures undertaken as part of the European Agenda on Migration. It called for the EU and the Member States to give priority to integration through early targeted measures on education, training, culture and sport.

While underlining the important role of sport as an instrument for fostering social and intercultural dialogue, Parliament recalled their support for the existing initiatives of sports organisations, and encouraged the exchange of best practices between different entities engaged in sports activities aimed at the social integration of refugees. In this regard, it insisted on the need for Member States to facilitate the enrolment of refugee students at all educational levels, and called for greater efforts to be made to distribute pupils and place them effectively in national school systems. Members also called on the EU and the Member States to establish ‘education corridors’ by promoting agreements with European universities and the Mediterranean Universities Union (UNIMED).

Member States are called upon to provide targeted support to refugee and asylum-seeking children and young people as they enter the school system and to guarantee their protection.

The resolution recommended that supplementary language classes be provided to refugee children in their home-country languages. In this regard, it stressed the essential role of teachers in integrating refugee and migrant children and young people into the education system. Member States are called upon to help migrant teachers and professors find teaching jobs , with a view both to improve their situation and to put their language and teaching skills and experience to good use in the school systems.

Parliament expressed support for the setting up of helpdesks for teachers that offer timely support in handling various types of diversity in the classroom, and in promoting intercultural dialogue and guidance when they are confronted with conflicts or students at risk of being radicalised.

It also emphasised the importance of promoting and further developing educational apps, videos and exercises, as well as learning platforms for refugees, in order to facilitate and complement their education and training

It should be noted that a motion for resolution proposed by the ENF was rejected in plenary by 72 votes to 623 with 11 abstentions.

Documents
2016/07/05
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/07/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/06/10
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the initiative report by Brando BENIFEI (S&D, IT) on refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market.

The Committee on Culture and Education, exercising the prerogative of an associated committee in line with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament , was also consulted to give an opinion on the report.

Members stressed the need for the EU to base its immediate response to the situation on solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as stated in Article 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and on a holistic approach that takes into account the need to improve safe and legal migration channels.

Taking note of the high degree of heterogeneity and lack of clarity in the use of the term refugee in the public and political discourse, Members stressed the importance of making a clear differentiation between refugee and economic migrant for the purposes of implementing the various European and international policies.

They stressed that significant differences exist in the times and modalities of processing requests for international protection within Member States and highlighted that slow and excessively bureaucratic procedures may hinder refugees and asylum seekers’ access to education and training, employment guidance and the labour market, the activation of EU and Member States' programmes, and the effective and coordinated use of funds in this field, as well as increase the refugees and asylum seekers' vulnerability to undeclared work and precarious working conditions. Members called for an approach, which prescribes appropriate adaptation and presupposes cooperation, and to address a range of serious and multi-faceted issues.

Members rejected the idea of creating special labour markets for refugees but advocated that the respective national minimum wage should also remain valid for refugees. They emphasised the benefits of education on social inclusion and integration into the labour market and stressed the importance of guaranteeing all refugees, in particular girls and women, access to formal, informal and non-formal education and long-life training, combined with work experience. Members also stressed the importance of a tailor-made integration approach based on equal opportunities.

Challenges and opportunities : Members called for measures to facilitate effective access for refugees and asylum seekers to housing, health care, education, social protection and the labour market, in order to restore their human dignity and self-worth. They recalled that the Qualifications Directive and the Reception Conditions Directive provides for the right of access to the labour market and to vocational training, both for asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection.

They highlighted the fact that labour market conditions within host countries is one of the determining factors when it comes to ensuring sustainable and successful integration of refugees .

The Commission and the Member States should continue to prioritise policies and investments aimed at providing quality employment for the whole of society, with a particular focus on the most vulnerable people, and on economic growth. Members pointed to the major disparities in social and economic circumstances within the EU. They should be taken into account when refugees are relocated, in order to maximise their labour-market integration prospects.

Members called on the Member States to ensure that welcoming refugees goes hand-in-hand with a solid integration policy , such as language and orientation courses, that provide comprehensive insights into fundamental EU rights and values and social inclusiveness.

From a budgetary point of view, Members highlighted the fact that public spending, covering extraordinary investments in social inclusion and labour-market integration measures and programmes, are likely to have a positive effect on national GDPs in the short term, while medium- or long-term impacts on public finances will depend on the effectiveness of these measures. They stressed that the main EU funds available for social inclusion and integration into the labour market, in particular the European Social Fund (ESF), the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Fund for Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD), have different focuses, target groups and management modes at Member State level. However, Members stated that, as these funds are insufficient, increased public investment and additional resources are required in order to provide, as a matter of priority, local authorities, social partners, social and economic actors, civil society and volunteer organisations with direct financial support for measures aimed at facilitating swift integration of refugees and asylum seekers into society and the labour market (the AMIF has already used up all its resources).

In addition, Members highlighted that integration and inclusion measures aimed at refugees and asylum seekers should not draw on financial resources destined for programmes targeting other disadvantaged groups, but necessarily require additional social investments reflecting the need for additional measures. They called, therefore, on the Commission to consider introducing a minimum share of 25 % of the cohesion policy budget for the ESF Fund in the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) , in order to ensure adequate resources for labour market integration in the long term. More generally, Members called on the Council, in the context of the forthcoming revision of the MFF, to adjust the ceilings for total allocations and for the individual headings to take account of the internal and external challenges which have arisen in connection with the refugee crisis, and to bring them into line with the needs of the Member States facing greatest integration challenge.

Making integration work : Members are convinced that integrating refugees into the labour market will be difficult without active, large-scale support from microenterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU. They expressed support for the Commission’s efforts in updating the European Agenda on Migration, in particular by revising the Dublin III Regulation in order to improve solidarity, responsibility-sharing and the harmonisation of protection standards among Member States. However, further efforts are necessary to create a truly uniform Common European Asylum System , and a comprehensive and sustainable legal migration policy in the EU that meets labour market demands in terms of skills, in which social inclusion and active integration policies play a central role. The Commission should do more to ensure that existing rules are fully and effectively implemented.

Members also regretted that the agreement, adopted in September 2015, on sharing refugees among the Member States is not being implemented satisfactorily. They stressed that the quotas for receiving refugees are not being met in the majority of the Member States.

Recommendations and best practices : the report made a series of recommendations to facilitate labour market integration of refugees. Members called on the Member States to:

ensure swift and full labour-market integration and social inclusion of refugees, in accordance with the principle of equal treatment, the national labour market situation and EU and national legislation; shorten the processing time of applications for international protection; ensure early, easy and equal access for refugees and asylum seekers to training, including internships and apprenticeships, in order to ensure rapid, effective and full integration into our societies and the labour market; set up dedicated platforms and multilingual internet portals aimed at providing concise and easily accessible information about recognition possibilities, existing integration programmes and lists of the institutions responsible, recalling that every EU and EEA Member State has a designated National Academic Recognition Information Centre, which provides a way to compare academic qualifications; facilitate the sharing of the experience and practices accumulated at city level to promote inclusive labour markets for all residents, including beneficiaries of international protection, and to involve cities and local authorities in the design and implementation of social and economic inclusion policies.

As for the Commission, it is called upon to:

consider a targeted revision of the Reception Conditions Directive in order to ensure that applicants of international protection have access to the labour market as soon as possible, but not later than six months after their applications were lodged ; promote upward convergence of social protection standards and a swift delivery of work permits in the Member States; intensify its efforts to ensure that refugees and asylum seekers are granted effective access to the labour market, in particular by verifying that Member States do not impose too restrictive conditions for access to employment; consider a revision of the Blue Card Directive in order to ensure its wider flexibility for those high-skilled beneficiaries of international protection who would potentially be entitled, as third-country nationals, to access the Blue Card system, by taking into account the extraordinary conditions with which refugees and asylum seekers are faced; combat all forms of discrimination, xenophobia and racism; enhance the dialogue with social partners, based on a balanced representation of interests, with a view to identifying labour market and employment opportunities for refugees; provide financial support to transnational schemes ensuring the transferability and adaptability of good practices – such as the peer-to-peer mentoring and coaching projects involving all levels of governance and multiple stakeholders, designed and implemented by different stakeholders at EU level.

Members called for monies to be redeployed as quickly as possible within the ESF, the AMIF, the ERDF and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) so that those Member States bearing the brunt of the refugee crisis are given more effective support.

Culture, education and sport : lastly, Members stressed the urgent need to ensure that unaccompanied minors receive particular protection from exploitation at work, violence and trafficking. They called on the Commission to increase the profile of culture, education and training in those operational measures undertaken as part of the European Agenda on Migration. They called for the EU and the Member States to give priority to integration through early targeted measures on education, training, culture and sport.

While underlining the important role of sport as an instrument for fostering social and intercultural dialogue, Members recalled their support for the existing initiatives of sports organisations, and encouraged the exchange of best practices between different entities engaged in sports activities aimed at the social integration of refugees. In this regard, Members insisted on the need for Member States to facilitate the enrolment of refugee students at all educational levels, and called for greater efforts to be made to distribute pupils and place them effectively in national school systems. Members also called on the EU and the Member States to establish ‘education corridors’ by promoting agreements with European universities and the Mediterranean Universities Union (UNIMED).

Member States are called upon to provide targeted support to refugee and asylum-seeking children and young people as they enter the school system and to guarantee their protection.

The report recommended that supplementary language classes be provided to refugee children in their home-country languages. In this regard, it stressed the essential role of teachers in integrating refugee and migrant children and young people into the education system. Member States are called upon to help migrant teachers and professors find teaching jobs, with a view both to improve their situation and to put their language and teaching skills and experience to good use in the school systems.

Members expressed support for the setting up of helpdesks for teachers that offer timely support in handling various types of diversity in the classroom, and in promoting intercultural dialogue and guidance when they are confronted with conflicts or students at risk of being radicalised .

They also emphasised the importance of promoting and further developing educational apps, videos and exercises, as well as learning platforms for refugees, in order to facilitate and complement their education and training.

Documents
2016/05/30
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/05/30
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/05/04
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/04/01
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/04/01
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/02/24
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/11/26
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/11/26
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2015/11/12
   EP - COSTA Silvia (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2015/10/22
   EP - BENIFEI Brando (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - Am 1 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: -: 623, +: 72, 0: 11
EE CY LU MT LV DK SI AT HR LT IE SK FI HU EL SE BG CZ BE PT RO NL GB FR PL ES IT DE
Total
5
5
6
6
8
13
8
17
9
10
10
12
13
21
20
17
15
21
20
21
28
24
67
73
47
49
66
94
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

France Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
175

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Finland S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
205

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 4/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 512, -: 177, 0: 18
DE IT ES FR RO PT BE BG SE NL AT SI EL HR LU PL MT SK LT FI EE CY IE DK LV HU GB CZ
Total
93
66
50
73
28
21
19
16
17
25
18
8
20
9
6
48
6
13
11
13
5
5
10
13
7
20
65
21
icon: S&D S&D
174
5

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3

Latvia S&D

1

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 7 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 696, -: 10, 0: 8
DE FR IT GB ES PL RO NL CZ PT BE AT SE BG HU EL SK FI LT IE HR SI LU DK LV MT EE CY
Total
94
73
67
67
50
48
28
25
21
21
20
18
17
16
21
20
13
13
11
10
9
8
6
13
8
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
207

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Germany EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 13 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 629, -: 55, 0: 29
DE IT ES GB PL FR RO PT CZ BE BG SE NL HU SK FI EL IE AT LT HR SI LV LU MT EE DK CY
Total
93
67
50
68
48
73
28
21
21
20
16
17
24
21
13
13
20
10
18
11
9
8
8
6
6
5
13
5
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

3
3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 14 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 622, -: 79, 0: 12
DE IT ES PL RO FR GB PT CZ BE BG NL SE HU SK LT FI IE AT EL HR LU SI MT EE DK CY LV
Total
94
67
50
47
28
72
68
21
21
20
16
25
17
21
13
11
13
10
18
20
9
6
8
6
5
13
5
8
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 15/1 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 554, -: 126, 0: 32
DE ES IT RO FR PT BE SE NL EL HU CZ PL FI IE BG AT SI LT GB HR LU MT EE SK LV CY DK
Total
93
50
67
28
73
21
20
17
24
20
21
20
48
13
10
16
18
8
11
68
9
6
6
5
13
8
5
13
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
3
icon: PPE PPE
205

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 15/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 355, -: 340, 0: 10
IT ES SE PT DE BE FI DK EL EE CY LT IE CZ RO LU HR BG AT MT NL SI LV SK HU GB FR PL
Total
66
48
17
21
92
20
13
13
20
5
5
11
10
20
27
5
9
16
18
6
25
8
8
13
21
68
71
48
icon: S&D S&D
172

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
204

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Croatia PPE

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 16 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 557, -: 141, 0: 15
DE PL ES RO GB FR IT BG BE HU CZ PT SK LT NL SE AT FI HR SI LV LU MT EE DK IE CY EL
Total
94
46
50
28
68
73
67
16
20
21
21
21
13
11
25
17
18
13
9
8
8
6
6
5
13
10
5
20
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Belgium S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

3

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 18 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 548, -: 92, 0: 73
DE ES IT FR PL RO PT CZ SE HU BG BE NL LT IE FI AT HR SK EL GB LU SI LV EE DK CY MT
Total
94
50
67
73
48
28
20
21
17
21
16
20
25
11
10
13
18
9
13
19
68
6
8
8
5
13
5
6
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 30/1 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 657, -: 43, 0: 13
DE FR IT ES PL RO GB PT HU BE CZ BG NL SE EL SK FI IE AT LT HR SI LV LU MT EE DK CY
Total
94
73
67
50
47
28
68
21
21
20
21
16
25
17
20
13
12
10
18
11
9
8
8
6
6
5
13
5
icon: PPE PPE
207

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 30/3 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 569, -: 85, 0: 60
DE IT ES PL FR RO PT HU CZ SE BG BE NL SK FI LT IE AT EL HR SI LU MT GB EE DK CY LV
Total
94
67
50
48
73
28
21
21
21
17
15
20
25
13
13
11
10
18
20
9
8
6
6
68
5
13
5
8
icon: PPE PPE
207

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 30/4 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 529, -: 121, 0: 65
IT FR DE GB RO ES PL CZ HU BG PT SK BE LT FI HR SI MT IE LU AT LV SE EE NL DK CY EL
Total
67
73
94
68
28
50
48
21
21
16
21
13
20
11
13
9
8
6
10
6
18
8
17
5
25
13
5
20
icon: PPE PPE
207

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

France EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

France Verts/ALE

5

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 31/1 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 536, -: 159, 0: 16
DE ES PL IT FR PT RO EL CZ BG NL AT BE FI LT IE SE LU SI MT HR EE CY LV DK SK HU GB
Total
94
50
48
67
73
21
28
20
21
16
25
18
19
13
11
10
17
6
8
6
9
5
5
7
13
13
20
67
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3
4
icon: PPE PPE
206

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Croatia PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

3
3
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 31/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 350, -: 331, 0: 17
IT ES DE PT BE LU LT EE RO IE FI EL FR HR CY AT DK MT SE SI LV BG SK NL HU GB CZ PL
Total
64
50
93
21
18
6
11
5
28
10
12
20
70
9
5
18
13
6
16
7
8
16
13
24
19
67
21
47
icon: S&D S&D
170

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

3

Czechia S&D

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

Against (1)

4

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
204

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Croatia PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 32/1 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 525, -: 178, 0: 11
DE ES IT FR PT SE RO BG CZ BE IE AT EL LT FI PL NL HR LU SI MT EE LV CY DK SK HU GB
Total
94
50
67
73
21
17
28
16
21
20
10
18
20
11
13
48
25
9
6
8
6
5
8
5
13
13
20
68
icon: S&D S&D
176

Czechia S&D

4

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 32/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 355, -: 346, 0: 12
IT ES PT SE DE EL BE AT EE LT RO IE CZ FI HR DK CY NL LU MT BG SI LV SK HU GB FR PL
Total
66
50
21
17
94
20
20
18
5
11
28
10
21
13
9
13
5
25
6
6
16
8
8
13
21
68
73
47
icon: S&D S&D
176

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

For (1)

Against (1)

4

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
207

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Croatia PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 36/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 445, -: 226, 0: 42
DE ES IT RO PT SE BG BE AT FR SI FI HR LT LU PL MT IE EE SK CY LV DK CZ EL NL HU GB
Total
94
50
67
28
21
17
16
20
18
72
8
13
9
11
6
48
6
10
5
13
5
8
13
21
20
25
20
68
icon: S&D S&D
176

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3
4
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 38/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 508, -: 177, 0: 28
DE IT ES PT FR SE RO EL BG BE IE SI LT NL HR LV LU MT FI EE AT PL SK CY CZ DK HU GB
Total
94
67
50
21
72
17
28
20
16
20
10
8
11
25
9
8
6
6
13
5
18
48
13
5
21
13
20
68
icon: S&D S&D
175

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 45/1 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 509, -: 175, 0: 26
DE ES IT RO PT SE FR EL CZ PL BG BE IE AT FI LT NL LU SI MT HR EE CY SK LV DK HU GB
Total
93
50
66
28
21
17
72
20
21
47
16
20
10
18
13
11
25
6
8
6
9
5
5
13
8
13
20
68
icon: S&D S&D
176

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3
icon: PPE PPE
205

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Croatia PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Italy ENF

For (1)

3

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 45/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: -: 346, +: 341, 0: 24
ES BE IT DE PT SE LU LT EE RO IE EL FI HR CY CZ AT MT BG DK SI LV NL SK HU GB FR PL
Total
50
20
65
94
21
17
6
11
5
28
10
20
13
9
5
21
18
6
16
12
8
8
25
13
20
68
73
48
icon: S&D S&D
175

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Croatia PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 46/1 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 573, -: 110, 0: 30
DE ES PL FR GB IT RO PT EL BE CZ SE BG NL FI IE AT LT HR SI LU MT EE SK LV CY DK HU
Total
94
50
48
73
68
66
28
21
20
20
21
17
16
25
13
10
18
11
9
8
6
6
5
13
8
5
13
20
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
3
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

3

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

1

France NI

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 46/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 331, -: 304, 0: 74
ES IT BE PT DE SE LT GB EL RO EE LU IE HR CY BG AT FI SI MT DK CZ NL SK LV HU FR PL
Total
50
67
19
21
94
16
11
68
20
28
5
6
10
9
5
16
18
12
8
6
13
21
25
13
8
20
72
47
icon: S&D S&D
175

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
206

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Croatia PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3
5

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 54/1 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 467, -: 185, 0: 59
IT DE ES RO CZ BE PT FR HU BG SK SE LT IE SI PL MT NL FI HR LU EE AT CY LV EL DK GB
Total
67
91
50
28
21
20
21
73
21
16
12
17
11
10
8
48
6
25
13
9
6
5
18
5
8
20
13
68
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
174

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 54/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: -: 387, +: 298, 0: 11
IT SE CZ LT BE EE RO HR FI LU AT MT ES PT CY BG DK SI NL SK LV IE DE HU EL GB FR PL
Total
67
17
20
9
19
5
28
9
11
6
18
6
49
21
5
16
12
7
25
13
8
10
90
20
20
67
70
47
icon: S&D S&D
171

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
60
3

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2
3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Germany ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
206

Lithuania PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 65 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 663, 0: 33, -: 17
DE FR IT ES GB PL RO PT CZ BE HU BG SE NL EL SK FI LT IE AT HR SI DK LV LU MT EE CY
Total
93
72
67
50
68
48
28
21
21
20
21
16
17
25
20
13
13
11
10
18
9
8
13
8
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
207

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 79 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 567, -: 131, 0: 12
DE IT ES PL GB RO FR PT HU SK EL BE SE IE BG CZ AT HR LU MT CY LT SI LV NL DK FI EE
Total
93
67
50
48
67
28
72
21
19
13
20
20
17
10
16
21
18
9
6
6
5
11
8
8
25
13
13
5
icon: PPE PPE
207

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1
5

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
173

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland ECR

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

3

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 84 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 538, -: 147, 0: 27
DE ES IT RO PT FR CZ SE HU BE BG EL NL IE AT FI HR LT LU SI PL EE CY SK DK MT LV GB
Total
93
50
67
28
21
72
21
17
21
20
16
20
25
10
18
13
9
11
6
8
48
5
5
13
13
5
8
68
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia S&D

1
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - § 88 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 613, -: 80, 0: 19
DE IT ES PL FR RO GB PT BG CZ HU BE NL SE EL LT SK IE AT FI HR SI LV LU MT EE DK CY
Total
92
67
50
48
73
28
68
21
16
21
21
20
25
17
20
11
13
10
18
13
8
8
8
6
6
5
13
5
icon: PPE PPE
207

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - Considérant K #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 547, -: 128, 0: 33
DE ES IT FR RO PT CZ NL SE HU BE BG EL IE AT FI LT HR GB LU SI DK CY PL MT LV EE SK
Total
93
49
67
72
28
21
20
25
17
21
20
16
20
10
18
13
11
9
67
6
8
13
5
47
6
8
4
13
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

France Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - Considérant R #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 625, -: 46, 0: 38
DE IT ES GB PL FR RO CZ NL BE PT HU BG SE EL LT FI SK IE AT HR SI LU DK MT EE CY LV
Total
92
67
49
68
48
71
28
21
25
20
21
21
16
17
20
11
13
13
10
18
9
8
6
12
6
5
5
8
icon: PPE PPE
205

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

3
3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - Considérant U/1 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 634, -: 45, 0: 31
DE IT ES PL GB FR RO PT BE EL AT HU BG CZ SE NL FI SK LT IE HR SI LV DK MT LU EE CY
Total
93
67
50
47
67
73
28
20
20
20
18
21
16
21
17
25
13
13
11
10
9
8
8
13
6
5
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
205

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

3
3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - Considérant U/2 #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 308, -: 301, 0: 93
IT GB PT ES DE SE EL CY IE FI HR DK MT LT SK AT LV RO LU EE CZ SI BE HU NL BG PL FR
Total
66
66
21
48
90
17
19
5
10
13
9
12
6
11
13
18
8
28
5
5
21
8
19
21
25
16
48
73
icon: S&D S&D
170

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

3
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
3

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

3
4

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
204

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Croatia PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

3

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - Considérant Z #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 360, -: 320, 0: 32
IT ES BE SE PT GB DE LT EL FI EE CZ RO IE CY HR LU AT MT NL DK BG SI SK LV HU FR PL
Total
67
49
20
17
21
68
93
11
20
13
5
21
28
10
5
9
6
18
6
25
13
16
8
12
8
21
73
48
icon: S&D S&D
175

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
205

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei - Résolution #

2016/07/05 Outcome: +: 486, -: 189, 0: 28
DE ES IT PT FR SE RO NL BG BE IE AT SI EL LT HR FI PL MT LU EE CY DK LV SK HU CZ GB
Total
93
50
67
21
69
17
28
25
16
20
10
18
8
20
11
9
12
48
6
5
5
5
13
8
13
20
21
65
icon: S&D S&D
173

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

For (1)

3

Latvia S&D

1

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

4
4

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

4
icon: PPE PPE
205

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
6
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

For (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
44

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2
AmendmentsDossier
528 2015/2321(INI)
2016/03/22 CULT 116 amendments...
source: 580.468
2016/04/01 EMPL 377 amendments...
source: 578.756
2016/05/26 EMPL 35 amendments...
source: 582.245

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: COSTA Silvia date: 2015-11-12T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: COSTA Silvia date: 2015-11-12T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-07-04-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/3
name
GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS Tania
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.366
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-PR-575366_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.756
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-578756_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.537
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-580537_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.074&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-577074_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.245
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-582245_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2016-06-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0204_EN.html title: A8-0204/2016
summary
events/3
date
2016-06-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0204_EN.html title: A8-0204/2016
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160704&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2016-07-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0297_EN.html title: T8-0297/2016
summary
events/6
date
2016-07-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0297_EN.html title: T8-0297/2016
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: BENIFEI Brando date: 2015-10-22T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-10-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BENIFEI Brando group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: COSTA Silvia date: 2015-11-12T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2015-11-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: COSTA Silvia group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0204&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0204_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0297
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0297_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-10-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BENIFEI Brando group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-10-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BENIFEI Brando group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
activities
  • date: 2015-11-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2015-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: COSTA Silvia body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MANN Thomas group: ECR name: STEVENS Helga group: ALDE name: WEBER Renate group: GUE/NGL name: GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS Tania group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERT Jean group: EFD name: AGEA Laura group: ENF name: BIZZOTTO Mara responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-10-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: BENIFEI Brando body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • date: 2016-05-30T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2015-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: COSTA Silvia body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MANN Thomas group: ECR name: STEVENS Helga group: ALDE name: WEBER Renate group: GUE/NGL name: GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS Tania group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERT Jean group: EFD name: AGEA Laura group: ENF name: BIZZOTTO Mara responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-10-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: BENIFEI Brando body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • date: 2016-06-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0204&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0204/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160704&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-07-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0297 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0297/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2015-10-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BENIFEI Brando group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CULT
date
2015-11-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: S&D name: COSTA Silvia
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2015-11-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: COSTA Silvia group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
EMPL
date
2015-10-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: S&D name: BENIFEI Brando
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
docs
  • date: 2016-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.366 title: PE575.366 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.756 title: PE578.756 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.537 title: PE580.537 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.074&secondRef=02 title: PE577.074 committee: CULT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.245 title: PE582.245 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27389&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)694 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-11-26T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-11-26T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-30T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-06-10T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0204&language=EN title: A8-0204/2016 summary: The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the initiative report by Brando BENIFEI (S&D, IT) on refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market. The Committee on Culture and Education, exercising the prerogative of an associated committee in line with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament , was also consulted to give an opinion on the report. Members stressed the need for the EU to base its immediate response to the situation on solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as stated in Article 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and on a holistic approach that takes into account the need to improve safe and legal migration channels. Taking note of the high degree of heterogeneity and lack of clarity in the use of the term refugee in the public and political discourse, Members stressed the importance of making a clear differentiation between refugee and economic migrant for the purposes of implementing the various European and international policies. They stressed that significant differences exist in the times and modalities of processing requests for international protection within Member States and highlighted that slow and excessively bureaucratic procedures may hinder refugees and asylum seekers’ access to education and training, employment guidance and the labour market, the activation of EU and Member States' programmes, and the effective and coordinated use of funds in this field, as well as increase the refugees and asylum seekers' vulnerability to undeclared work and precarious working conditions. Members called for an approach, which prescribes appropriate adaptation and presupposes cooperation, and to address a range of serious and multi-faceted issues. Members rejected the idea of creating special labour markets for refugees but advocated that the respective national minimum wage should also remain valid for refugees. They emphasised the benefits of education on social inclusion and integration into the labour market and stressed the importance of guaranteeing all refugees, in particular girls and women, access to formal, informal and non-formal education and long-life training, combined with work experience. Members also stressed the importance of a tailor-made integration approach based on equal opportunities. Challenges and opportunities : Members called for measures to facilitate effective access for refugees and asylum seekers to housing, health care, education, social protection and the labour market, in order to restore their human dignity and self-worth. They recalled that the Qualifications Directive and the Reception Conditions Directive provides for the right of access to the labour market and to vocational training, both for asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection. They highlighted the fact that labour market conditions within host countries is one of the determining factors when it comes to ensuring sustainable and successful integration of refugees . The Commission and the Member States should continue to prioritise policies and investments aimed at providing quality employment for the whole of society, with a particular focus on the most vulnerable people, and on economic growth. Members pointed to the major disparities in social and economic circumstances within the EU. They should be taken into account when refugees are relocated, in order to maximise their labour-market integration prospects. Members called on the Member States to ensure that welcoming refugees goes hand-in-hand with a solid integration policy , such as language and orientation courses, that provide comprehensive insights into fundamental EU rights and values and social inclusiveness. From a budgetary point of view, Members highlighted the fact that public spending, covering extraordinary investments in social inclusion and labour-market integration measures and programmes, are likely to have a positive effect on national GDPs in the short term, while medium- or long-term impacts on public finances will depend on the effectiveness of these measures. They stressed that the main EU funds available for social inclusion and integration into the labour market, in particular the European Social Fund (ESF), the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Fund for Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD), have different focuses, target groups and management modes at Member State level. However, Members stated that, as these funds are insufficient, increased public investment and additional resources are required in order to provide, as a matter of priority, local authorities, social partners, social and economic actors, civil society and volunteer organisations with direct financial support for measures aimed at facilitating swift integration of refugees and asylum seekers into society and the labour market (the AMIF has already used up all its resources). In addition, Members highlighted that integration and inclusion measures aimed at refugees and asylum seekers should not draw on financial resources destined for programmes targeting other disadvantaged groups, but necessarily require additional social investments reflecting the need for additional measures. They called, therefore, on the Commission to consider introducing a minimum share of 25 % of the cohesion policy budget for the ESF Fund in the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) , in order to ensure adequate resources for labour market integration in the long term. More generally, Members called on the Council, in the context of the forthcoming revision of the MFF, to adjust the ceilings for total allocations and for the individual headings to take account of the internal and external challenges which have arisen in connection with the refugee crisis, and to bring them into line with the needs of the Member States facing greatest integration challenge. Making integration work : Members are convinced that integrating refugees into the labour market will be difficult without active, large-scale support from microenterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU. They expressed support for the Commission’s efforts in updating the European Agenda on Migration, in particular by revising the Dublin III Regulation in order to improve solidarity, responsibility-sharing and the harmonisation of protection standards among Member States. However, further efforts are necessary to create a truly uniform Common European Asylum System , and a comprehensive and sustainable legal migration policy in the EU that meets labour market demands in terms of skills, in which social inclusion and active integration policies play a central role. The Commission should do more to ensure that existing rules are fully and effectively implemented. Members also regretted that the agreement, adopted in September 2015, on sharing refugees among the Member States is not being implemented satisfactorily. They stressed that the quotas for receiving refugees are not being met in the majority of the Member States. Recommendations and best practices : the report made a series of recommendations to facilitate labour market integration of refugees. Members called on the Member States to: ensure swift and full labour-market integration and social inclusion of refugees, in accordance with the principle of equal treatment, the national labour market situation and EU and national legislation; shorten the processing time of applications for international protection; ensure early, easy and equal access for refugees and asylum seekers to training, including internships and apprenticeships, in order to ensure rapid, effective and full integration into our societies and the labour market; set up dedicated platforms and multilingual internet portals aimed at providing concise and easily accessible information about recognition possibilities, existing integration programmes and lists of the institutions responsible, recalling that every EU and EEA Member State has a designated National Academic Recognition Information Centre, which provides a way to compare academic qualifications; facilitate the sharing of the experience and practices accumulated at city level to promote inclusive labour markets for all residents, including beneficiaries of international protection, and to involve cities and local authorities in the design and implementation of social and economic inclusion policies. As for the Commission, it is called upon to: consider a targeted revision of the Reception Conditions Directive in order to ensure that applicants of international protection have access to the labour market as soon as possible, but not later than six months after their applications were lodged ; promote upward convergence of social protection standards and a swift delivery of work permits in the Member States; intensify its efforts to ensure that refugees and asylum seekers are granted effective access to the labour market, in particular by verifying that Member States do not impose too restrictive conditions for access to employment; consider a revision of the Blue Card Directive in order to ensure its wider flexibility for those high-skilled beneficiaries of international protection who would potentially be entitled, as third-country nationals, to access the Blue Card system, by taking into account the extraordinary conditions with which refugees and asylum seekers are faced; combat all forms of discrimination, xenophobia and racism; enhance the dialogue with social partners, based on a balanced representation of interests, with a view to identifying labour market and employment opportunities for refugees; provide financial support to transnational schemes ensuring the transferability and adaptability of good practices – such as the peer-to-peer mentoring and coaching projects involving all levels of governance and multiple stakeholders, designed and implemented by different stakeholders at EU level. Members called for monies to be redeployed as quickly as possible within the ESF, the AMIF, the ERDF and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) so that those Member States bearing the brunt of the refugee crisis are given more effective support. Culture, education and sport : lastly, Members stressed the urgent need to ensure that unaccompanied minors receive particular protection from exploitation at work, violence and trafficking. They called on the Commission to increase the profile of culture, education and training in those operational measures undertaken as part of the European Agenda on Migration. They called for the EU and the Member States to give priority to integration through early targeted measures on education, training, culture and sport. While underlining the important role of sport as an instrument for fostering social and intercultural dialogue, Members recalled their support for the existing initiatives of sports organisations, and encouraged the exchange of best practices between different entities engaged in sports activities aimed at the social integration of refugees. In this regard, Members insisted on the need for Member States to facilitate the enrolment of refugee students at all educational levels, and called for greater efforts to be made to distribute pupils and place them effectively in national school systems. Members also called on the EU and the Member States to establish ‘education corridors’ by promoting agreements with European universities and the Mediterranean Universities Union (UNIMED). Member States are called upon to provide targeted support to refugee and asylum-seeking children and young people as they enter the school system and to guarantee their protection. The report recommended that supplementary language classes be provided to refugee children in their home-country languages. In this regard, it stressed the essential role of teachers in integrating refugee and migrant children and young people into the education system. Member States are called upon to help migrant teachers and professors find teaching jobs, with a view both to improve their situation and to put their language and teaching skills and experience to good use in the school systems. Members expressed support for the setting up of helpdesks for teachers that offer timely support in handling various types of diversity in the classroom, and in promoting intercultural dialogue and guidance when they are confronted with conflicts or students at risk of being radicalised . They also emphasised the importance of promoting and further developing educational apps, videos and exercises, as well as learning platforms for refugees, in order to facilitate and complement their education and training.
  • date: 2016-07-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160704&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-07-05T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27389&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-07-05T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0297 title: T8-0297/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 486 votes to 189, with 28 abstentions, a resolution on refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market. Parliament stressed the need for the EU to base its immediate response to the situation on solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as stated in Article 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and on a holistic approach that takes into account the need to improve safe and legal migration channels. Taking note of the high degree of heterogeneity and lack of clarity in the use of the term refugee in the public and political discourse, Parliament stressed the importance of making a clear differentiation between refugee and economic migrant for the purposes of implementing the various European and international policies. It stressed that significant differences exist in the times and modalities of processing requests for international protection within Member States and highlighted that slow and excessively bureaucratic procedures may hinder refugees and asylum seekers’ access to education and training, employment guidance and the labour market, the activation of EU and Member States' programmes, and the effective and coordinated use of funds in this field, as well as increase the refugees and asylum seekers' vulnerability to undeclared work and precarious working conditions. It called for an approach, which prescribes appropriate adaptation and presupposes cooperation, and to address a range of serious and multi-faceted issues. Parliament rejected the idea of creating special labour markets for refugees but advocated that the respective national minimum wage should also remain valid for refugees. It emphasised the benefits of education on social inclusion and integration into the labour market and stressed the importance of guaranteeing all refugees, in particular girls and women, access to formal, informal and non-formal education and long-life training, combined with work experience. It also stressed the importance of a tailor-made integration approach based on equal opportunities. It called on the Member States to establish a language training system , closely linking general and vocational language training. Challenges and opportunities : Parliament called for measures to facilitate effective access for refugees and asylum seekers to housing, health care, education, social protection and the labour market, in order to restore their human dignity and self-worth. It recalled that the Qualifications Directive and the Reception Conditions Directive provides for the right of access to the labour market and to vocational training, both for asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection. It highlighted the fact that labour market conditions within host countries is one of the determining factors when it comes to ensuring sustainable and successful integration of refugees . The Commission and the Member States should continue to prioritise policies and investments aimed at providing quality employment for the whole of society, with a particular focus on the most vulnerable people, and on economic growth. Members pointed to the major disparities in social and economic circumstances within the EU. They should be taken into account when refugees are relocated, in order to maximise their labour-market integration prospects. Parliament called on the Member States to ensure that welcoming refugees goes hand-in-hand with a solid integration policy , such as language and orientation courses, that provide comprehensive insights into fundamental EU rights and values and social inclusiveness. From a budgetary point of view, Parliament highlighted the fact that public spending, covering extraordinary investments in social inclusion and labour-market integration measures and programmes, are likely to have a positive effect on national GDPs in the short term, while medium- or long-term impacts on public finances will depend on the effectiveness of these measures. It stressed that the main EU funds available for social inclusion and integration into the labour market, in particular the European Social Fund (ESF), the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Fund for Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD), have different focuses, target groups and management modes at Member State level. However, Parliament stated that, as these funds are insufficient , increased public investment and additional resources are required in order to provide, as a matter of priority, local authorities, social partners, social and economic actors, civil society and volunteer organisations with direct financial support for measures aimed at facilitating swift integration of refugees and asylum seekers into society and the labour market (the AMIF has already used up all its resources). In addition, Parliament highlighted that integration and inclusion measures aimed at refugees and asylum seekers should not draw on financial resources destined for programmes targeting other disadvantaged groups, but necessarily require additional social investments reflecting the need for additional measures. It called, therefore, on the Commission to consider introducing a minimum share of 25 % of the cohesion policy budget for the ESF Fund in the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) , in order to ensure adequate resources for labour market integration in the long term. More generally, Parliament called on the Council, in the context of the forthcoming revision of the MFF, to adjust the ceilings for total allocations and for the individual headings to take account of the internal and external challenges which have arisen in connection with the refugee crisis, and to bring them into line with the needs of the Member States facing greatest integration challenge. Making integration work : Parliament is convinced that integrating refugees into the labour market will be difficult without active, large-scale support from microenterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU. It expressed support for the Commission’s efforts in updating the European Agenda on Migration, in particular by revising the Dublin III Regulation in order to improve solidarity, responsibility-sharing and the harmonisation of protection standards among Member States. However, further efforts are necessary to create a truly uniform Common European Asylum System, and a comprehensive and sustainable legal migration policy in the EU that meets labour market demands in terms of skills, in which social inclusion and active integration policies play a central role. The Commission should do more to ensure that existing rules are fully and effectively implemented. Parliament also regretted that the agreement, adopted in September 2015, on sharing refugees among the Member States is not being implemented satisfactorily. It stressed that the quotas for receiving refugees are not being met in the majority of the Member States. In a series of amendments adopted in plenary, Parliament welcomed the establishment of a ‘Skills Profile Tool’ for third-country nationals in the framework of the Commission’s ‘New skills agenda for Europe’, aimed at strengthening early identification and documentation of the skills and qualifications of third-country nationals, introducing a guide on best practices to support labour market integration in Member States and improving online language learning for newly arrived refugees and asylum seekers through the Erasmus + online language courses. Parliament also welcomed the Commission’s ‘Action Plan on the integration of third country nationals’, addressing pre-departure and pre-arrival measures, education, employment and vocational training, access to basic services, active participation and social inclusion. Recommendations and best practices : the resolution made a series of recommendations to facilitate labour market integration of refugees. Parliament called on the Member States to: ensure swift and full labour-market integration and social inclusion of refugees, in accordance with the principle of equal treatment, the national labour market situation and EU and national legislation; shorten the processing time of applications for international protection; ensure early, easy and equal access for refugees and asylum seekers to training, including internships and apprenticeships, in order to ensure rapid, effective and full integration into our societies and the labour market; set up dedicated platforms and multilingual internet portals aimed at providing concise and easily accessible information about recognition possibilities, existing integration programmes and lists of the institutions responsible, recalling that every EU and EEA Member State has a designated National Academic Recognition Information Centre, which provides a way to compare academic qualifications; facilitate the sharing of the experience and practices accumulated at city level to promote inclusive labour markets for all residents, including beneficiaries of international protection, and to involve cities and local authorities in the design and implementation of social and economic inclusion policies. As for the Commission, it is called upon to: consider a targeted revision of the Reception Conditions Directive in order to ensure that applicants of international protection have access to the labour market as soon as possible after their applications were lodged ; promote upward convergence of social protection standards and a swift delivery of work permits in the Member States; intensify its efforts to ensure that refugees and asylum seekers are granted effective access to the labour market, in particular by verifying that Member States do not impose too restrictive conditions for access to employment; consider a revision of the Blue Card Directive ; combat all forms of discrimination, xenophobia and racism by raising awareness of anti-discrimination laws, by supporting local authorities, civil society organisations, social partners and National Equality Bodies in their work; enhance the dialogue with social partners, based on a balanced representation of interests, with a view to identifying labour market and employment opportunities for refugees; provide financial support to transnational schemes ensuring the transferability and adaptability of good practices – such as the peer-to-peer mentoring and coaching projects involving all levels of governance and multiple stakeholders, designed and implemented by different stakeholders at EU level. Parliament called for monies to be redeployed as quickly as possible within the ESF, the AMIF, the ERDF and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) so that those Member States bearing the brunt of the refugee crisis are given more effective support. Culture, education and sport : Parliament stressed the urgent need to ensure that unaccompanied minors receive particular protection from exploitation at work, violence and trafficking. It called on the Commission to increase the profile of culture, education and training in those operational measures undertaken as part of the European Agenda on Migration. It called for the EU and the Member States to give priority to integration through early targeted measures on education, training, culture and sport. While underlining the important role of sport as an instrument for fostering social and intercultural dialogue, Parliament recalled their support for the existing initiatives of sports organisations, and encouraged the exchange of best practices between different entities engaged in sports activities aimed at the social integration of refugees. In this regard, it insisted on the need for Member States to facilitate the enrolment of refugee students at all educational levels, and called for greater efforts to be made to distribute pupils and place them effectively in national school systems. Members also called on the EU and the Member States to establish ‘education corridors’ by promoting agreements with European universities and the Mediterranean Universities Union (UNIMED). Member States are called upon to provide targeted support to refugee and asylum-seeking children and young people as they enter the school system and to guarantee their protection. The resolution recommended that supplementary language classes be provided to refugee children in their home-country languages. In this regard, it stressed the essential role of teachers in integrating refugee and migrant children and young people into the education system. Member States are called upon to help migrant teachers and professors find teaching jobs , with a view both to improve their situation and to put their language and teaching skills and experience to good use in the school systems. Parliament expressed support for the setting up of helpdesks for teachers that offer timely support in handling various types of diversity in the classroom, and in promoting intercultural dialogue and guidance when they are confronted with conflicts or students at risk of being radicalised. It also emphasised the importance of promoting and further developing educational apps, videos and exercises, as well as learning platforms for refugees, in order to facilitate and complement their education and training It should be noted that a motion for resolution proposed by the ENF was rejected in plenary by 72 votes to 623 with 11 abstentions.
  • date: 2016-07-05T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
EMPL/8/04581
New
  • EMPL/8/04581
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.10.05 Social inclusion, poverty, minimum income
  • 4.15.04 Workforce, occupational mobility, job conversion, working conditions
  • 7.10 Free movement and integration of third-country nationals
  • 7.10.06 Asylum, refugees, displaced persons; Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF)
New
4.10.05
Social inclusion, poverty, minimum income
4.15.04
Workforce, occupational mobility, job conversion, working conditions
7.10
Free movement and integration of third-country nationals
7.10.06
Asylum, refugees, displaced persons; Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF)
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160704&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0297 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0297/2016
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the initiative report by Brando BENIFEI (S&D, IT) on refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market.

    The Committee on Culture and Education, exercising the prerogative of an associated committee in line with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, was also consulted to give an opinion on the report.

    Members stressed the need for the EU to base its immediate response to the situation on solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as stated in Article 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and on a holistic approach that takes into account the need to improve safe and legal migration channels.

    Taking note of the high degree of heterogeneity and lack of clarity in the use of the term refugee in the public and political discourse, Members stressed the importance of making a clear differentiation between refugee and economic migrant for the purposes of implementing the various European and international policies.

    They stressed that significant differences exist in the times and modalities of processing requests for international protection within Member States and highlighted that slow and excessively bureaucratic procedures may hinder refugees and asylum seekers’ access to education and training, employment guidance and the labour market, the activation of EU and Member States' programmes, and the effective and coordinated use of funds in this field, as well as increase the refugees and asylum seekers' vulnerability to undeclared work and precarious working conditions. Members called for an approach, which prescribes appropriate adaptation and presupposes cooperation, and to address a range of serious and multi-faceted issues.

    Members rejected the idea of creating special labour markets for refugees but advocated that the respective national minimum wage should also remain valid for refugees. They emphasised the benefits of education on social inclusion and integration into the labour market and stressed the importance of guaranteeing all refugees, in particular girls and women, access to formal, informal and non-formal education and long-life training, combined with work experience. Members also stressed the importance of a tailor-made integration approach based on equal opportunities.

    Challenges and opportunities: Members called for measures to facilitate effective access for refugees and asylum seekers to housing, health care, education, social protection and the labour market, in order to restore their human dignity and self-worth. They recalled that the Qualifications Directive and the Reception Conditions Directive provides for the right of access to the labour market and to vocational training, both for asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection.

    They highlighted the fact that labour market conditions within host countries is one of the determining factors when it comes to ensuring sustainable and successful integration of refugees.

    The Commission and the Member States should continue to prioritise policies and investments aimed at providing quality employment for the whole of society, with a particular focus on the most vulnerable people, and on economic growth. Members pointed to the major disparities in social and economic circumstances within the EU. They should be taken into account when refugees are relocated, in order to maximise their labour-market integration prospects.

    Members called on the Member States to ensure that welcoming refugees goes hand-in-hand with a solid integration policy, such as language and orientation courses, that provide comprehensive insights into fundamental EU rights and values and social inclusiveness.

    From a budgetary point of view, Members highlighted the fact that public spending, covering extraordinary investments in social inclusion and labour-market integration measures and programmes, are likely to have a positive effect on national GDPs in the short term, while medium- or long-term impacts on public finances will depend on the effectiveness of these measures. They stressed that the main EU funds available for social inclusion and integration into the labour market, in particular the European Social Fund (ESF), the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Fund for Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD), have different focuses, target groups and management modes at Member State level. However, Members stated that, as these funds are insufficient, increased public investment and additional resources are required in order to provide, as a matter of priority, local authorities, social partners, social and economic actors, civil society and volunteer organisations with direct financial support for measures aimed at facilitating swift integration of refugees and asylum seekers into society and the labour market (the AMIF has already used up all its resources).

    In addition, Members highlighted that integration and inclusion measures aimed at refugees and asylum seekers should not draw on financial resources destined for programmes targeting other disadvantaged groups, but necessarily require additional social investments reflecting the need for additional measures. They called, therefore, on the Commission to consider introducing a minimum share of 25 % of the cohesion policy budget for the ESF Fund in the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), in order to ensure adequate resources for labour market integration in the long term. More generally, Members called on the Council, in the context of the forthcoming revision of the MFF, to adjust the ceilings for total allocations and for the individual headings to take account of the internal and external challenges which have arisen in connection with the refugee crisis, and to bring them into line with the needs of the Member States facing greatest integration challenge.

    Making integration work: Members are convinced that integrating refugees into the labour market will be difficult without active, large-scale support from microenterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU. They expressed support for the Commission’s efforts in updating the European Agenda on Migration, in particular by revising the Dublin III Regulation in order to improve solidarity, responsibility-sharing and the harmonisation of protection standards among Member States. However, further efforts are necessary to create a truly uniform Common European Asylum System, and a comprehensive and sustainable legal migration policy in the EU that meets labour market demands in terms of skills, in which social inclusion and active integration policies play a central role. The Commission should do more to ensure that existing rules are fully and effectively implemented.

    Members also regretted that the agreement, adopted in September 2015, on sharing refugees among the Member States is not being implemented satisfactorily. They stressed that the quotas for receiving refugees are not being met in the majority of the Member States.

    Recommendations and best practices: the report made a series of recommendations to facilitate labour market integration of refugees. Members called on the Member States to:

    • ensure swift and full labour-market integration and social inclusion of refugees, in accordance with the principle of equal treatment, the national labour market situation and EU and national legislation;
    • shorten the processing time of applications for international protection;
    • ensure early, easy and equal access for refugees and asylum seekers to training, including internships and apprenticeships, in order to ensure rapid, effective and full integration into our societies and the labour market;
    • set up dedicated platforms and multilingual internet portals aimed at providing concise and easily accessible information about recognition possibilities, existing integration programmes and lists of the institutions responsible, recalling that every EU and EEA Member State has a designated National Academic Recognition Information Centre, which provides a way to compare academic qualifications;
    • facilitate the sharing of the experience and practices accumulated at city level to promote inclusive labour markets for all residents, including beneficiaries of international protection, and to involve cities and local authorities in the design and implementation of social and economic inclusion policies.

    As for the Commission, it is called upon to:

    • consider a targeted revision of the Reception Conditions Directive in order to ensure that applicants of international protection have access to the labour market as soon as possible, but not later than six months after their applications were lodged;
    • promote upward convergence of social protection standards and a swift delivery of work permits in the Member States; 
    • intensify its efforts to ensure that refugees and asylum seekers are granted effective access to the labour market, in particular by verifying that Member States do not impose too restrictive conditions for access to employment;
    • consider a revision of the Blue Card Directive in order to ensure its wider flexibility for those high-skilled beneficiaries of international protection who would potentially be entitled, as third-country nationals, to access the Blue Card system, by taking into account the extraordinary conditions with which refugees and asylum seekers are faced;
    • combat all forms of discrimination, xenophobia and racism;
    • enhance the dialogue with social partners, based on a balanced representation of interests, with a view to identifying labour market and employment opportunities for refugees;
    • provide financial support to transnational schemes ensuring the transferability and adaptability of good practices – such as the peer-to-peer mentoring and coaching projects involving all levels of governance and multiple stakeholders, designed and implemented by different stakeholders at EU level.

    Members called for monies to be redeployed as quickly as possible within the ESF, the AMIF, the ERDF and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) so that those Member States bearing the brunt of the refugee crisis are given more effective support. 

    Culture, education and sport: lastly, Members stressed the urgent need to ensure that unaccompanied minors receive particular protection from exploitation at work, violence and trafficking. They called on the Commission to increase the profile of culture, education and training in those operational measures undertaken as part of the European Agenda on Migration. They called for the EU and the Member States to give priority to integration through early targeted measures on education, training, culture and sport.

    While underlining the important role of sport as an instrument for fostering social and intercultural dialogue, Members recalled their support for the existing initiatives of sports organisations, and encouraged the exchange of best practices between different entities engaged in sports activities aimed at the social integration of refugees. In this regard, Members insisted on the need for Member States to facilitate the enrolment of refugee students at all educational levels, and called for greater efforts to be made to distribute pupils and place them effectively in national school systems. Members also called on the EU and the Member States to establish ‘education corridors’ by promoting agreements with European universities and the Mediterranean Universities Union (UNIMED).

    Member States are called upon to provide targeted support to refugee and asylum-seeking children and young people as they enter the school system and to guarantee their protection.

    The report recommended that supplementary language classes be provided to refugee children in their home-country languages. In this regard, it stressed the essential role of teachers in integrating refugee and migrant children and young people into the education system. Member States are called upon to help migrant teachers and professors find teaching jobs, with a view both to improve their situation and to put their language and teaching skills and experience to good use in the school systems.

    Members expressed support for the setting up of helpdesks for teachers that offer timely support in handling various types of diversity in the classroom, and in promoting intercultural dialogue and guidance when they are confronted with conflicts or students at risk of being radicalised.

    They also emphasised the importance of promoting and further developing educational apps, videos and exercises, as well as learning platforms for refugees, in order to facilitate and complement their education and training.

activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0204&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0204/2016
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4
date
2016-07-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2
date
2016-06-10T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1
date
2016-05-30T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1
date
2016-05-30T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/date
Old
2016-05-24T00:00:00
New
2016-05-30T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
BIZZOTTO Mara
committees/1/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
BIZZOTTO Mara
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
WEBER Renate
committees/1/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
WEBER Renate
activities/1
date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2
date
2016-07-04T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/subject/3
Old
7.10.06 Asylum, refugees, displaced persons
New
7.10.06 Asylum, refugees, displaced persons; Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF)
activities/0
date
2015-11-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
EMPL/8/04581
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2015-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: COSTA Silvia
    • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MANN Thomas group: ECR name: STEVENS Helga group: GUE/NGL name: GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS Tania group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERT Jean group: EFD name: AGEA Laura responsible: True committee: EMPL date: 2015-10-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: BENIFEI Brando
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: THYSSEN Marianne
    procedure
    reference
    2015/2321(INI)
    title
    Refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject