BETA


2015/2887(RSP) Resolution on the competitiveness of the European rail supply industry

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE WERNER Martina (icon: S&D S&D) MORANO Nadine (icon: PPE PPE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen (icon: ECR ECR), RIQUET Dominique (icon: ALDE ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BORRELLI David (icon: EFDD EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara (icon: ENF ENF)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2016/11/18
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/06/09
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2016/06/09
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/06/09
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/06/09
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy on the competitiveness of the European rail supply industry (RSI).

Members recalled that this industry employs 400 000 employees , invests 2.7 % of its annual turnover in R&D and accounts for 46 % of the world RSI market . The railway sector overall, including operators and infrastructure, is responsible for more than 1 million direct and 1.2 million indirect jobs in the EU.

Recalling that by reason of its position as a world leader in technology and innovation, the rail supply industry has a key role to play in the Commission’s 20 % reindustrialisation target, Parliament formulated the following recommendations:

Maintaining global leadership of the European rail supply industry: Parliament believed that achieving the objective of establishing a single European railway area will be crucial to maintaining the European RSI’s global dominance. It stressed that third-country competitors, especially from China, are expanding rapidly and aggressively into Europe with strong political and financial support from their country of origin (e.g. generous export credits), and highlighted the need for a fair and level playing field in global competition and for reciprocal market access in order to avert the risk of job losses and to safeguard industrial know-how in Europe.

A renewed European rail industry innovation agenda: Parliament welcomed the decision to establish the ‘Shift2Rail’ Joint Undertaking and asked for swift and timely implementation of all S2R R&D activities as soon as possible. It also asked the Commission to:

fully mobilise the various EU funding instruments , to explore additional sources of financing for S2R and to seek for synergies between different EU funds and with private investments; increase support for innovation projects developed by rail clusters and other initiatives that bring together RSI SMEs, larger companies and research institutes at local, regional, national and European level; consider the setting up of a forum at European level that would bring together established companies, start-ups and spin-offs which have innovative ideas for the rail sector, especially in the field of digitalisation, with a view to exchanging best practice and facilitating partnerships.

Members called for swift implementation of an integrated e-ticketing system coordinated with other transport modes and other potential services provided by single-ticket operators.

Getting the right skills for a future-proof rail supply industry : Parliament called for a European training and education strategy that brings together RSI companies, research institutes and social partners to jointly investigate which skills are needed for a sustainable and innovative RSI. A feasibility study towards a potential European Sectoral Skills Council on Rail should be launched in this context. The Commission was asked to encourage social dialogue in order to facilitate social innovation and foster quality long-term employment in order to contribute to the attractiveness of the sector for skilled personnel.

Supporting SMEs : given that access to finance is one of the main challenges for SMEs in the RSI, Parliament stressed the added value of COSME and the Structural Funds in helping SMEs gain access to funding, including in the form of guarantee and equity facilities.

It also asked the Commission to: (i) develop Sector Groups on Rail in the framework of the Enterprise Europe Network, which could advise and train RSI SMEs on different innovation funding schemes, grants, and internationalization; (ii) consider all options for support to RSI SMEs, including in the framework of a possible targeted review of the Small Business Act.

Improving the European market environment for suppliers and encouraging the demand for rail products : Parliament stressed the need for a full, effective and uniform implementation of the rail network for competitive freight regulation, benefiting both passengers and industry. It welcomed the adoption of the technical pillar of the fourth Railway Package and asked for its speedy implementation as a key enabler for a real single market for rail products .

Members stressed that increased interoperability and a stronger role for the European Railway Agency (ERA) will facilitate the harmonisation of the network and therefore have the potential to bring down costs for the development and authorisation of rolling stock and the European Railway Traffic Management System (ERTMS) trackside.

The resolution called for further European standardisation in the railway sector and for swift implementation of the 2014 EU public procurement directives . Members called on the Commission to:

evaluate whether the current set of EU competition rules should be updated to allow for strategic partnerships and alliances on the part of the European RSI; monitor non-European rail investment in EU Member States and to guarantee compliance with European public procurement legislation.

Boosting investment in rail projects : Parliament expected existing EU funding instruments (e.g. CEF, Structural Funds) to be used to the full so that demand is stimulated for rail projects (including EU funding instruments for investment outside the EU such as the Pre-accession Assistance and European Neighbourhood Instrument).

It highlighted the importance of a successful implementation of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) as one tool to mobilise private capital for the rail sector. It also asked the Commission to work with the multilateral development banks to help public authorities and private agencies to invest in the most sustainable and energy-efficient railway equipment around the world.

Strengthening the global competitiveness of the rail supply industry : in this regard, Parliament asked the Commission to:

ensure that future trade agreements (including the ongoing negotiations with Japan, China and the USA) and the revisions of existing trade agreements include specific provisions which significantly improve market access for the European RSI, especially with respect to public procurement; ensure that EU trade policy is more consistent with industrial policy, so that trade policy takes account of the needs of European industry and the new generation of trade agreements does not lead to fresh relocations and further deindustrialisation in the EU; strive to lift the major non-tariff barriers impeding access by the European rail industry to foreign markets, including barriers to investment; ensure a coherent EU trade strategy which ensures compliance with the principle of reciprocity, particularly in relation to Japan, China and the USA.

Parliament supported further internationalisation of RSI , through the promotion of European standards and technologies at international level, such as the ERTMS, and by looking into how to better protect the intellectual property rights (IPRs) of the European RSI.

Improving strategic political support for the sector : Parliament called on the Commission to organise a high-level industrial dialogue on the RSI with the participation of the relevant Commissioners, Members of the European Parliament, Council, Member States, rail industry, trade unions, research institutions, the European Railway Agency and European Standardisation Organisations. It also called on the Competitiveness Council to put the European RSI concretely on its agenda.

Documents
2016/06/09
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/05/13
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents
2016/02/29
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/06/24
   EP - WERNER Martina (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE

Documents

Activities

Votes

B8-0677/2016 - Am 1 #

2016/06/09 Outcome: -: 501, +: 101, 0: 13
EL CY IE LU EE LV MT SI DK FI LT SE HR SK PT HU BE CZ BG FR GB NL AT ES IT RO PL DE
Total
17
5
9
5
4
6
6
8
11
12
9
13
11
11
20
18
19
17
15
63
33
22
18
46
60
26
46
85
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
29

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (2)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
4
icon: ECR ECR
55

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
154

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2
icon: PPE PPE
188

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

B8-0677/2016 - Am 3 #

2016/06/09 Outcome: -: 444, +: 152, 0: 20
FR EL CY IE LU SE LV EE GB MT SI DK LT BE PT FI HR HU NL AT SK CZ BG ES IT RO DE PL
Total
63
17
5
9
5
14
6
4
33
6
8
11
9
19
20
12
11
18
23
17
11
19
15
46
60
26
83
46
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
11

France NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
55

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
153

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Sweden S&D

4

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Lithuania S&D

2

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
188

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

B8-0677/2016 - Am 5 #

2016/06/09 Outcome: -: 301, +: 294, 0: 21
IT FR ES EL IE DK SE PT CY RO BE MT AT DE GB LU SI EE LV HR LT FI SK HU CZ NL BG PL
Total
59
62
46
17
8
11
14
20
5
26
19
6
18
85
33
5
8
4
6
11
9
12
11
18
19
23
15
46
icon: S&D S&D
155

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2
3

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
11

France NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
55

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

3

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ALDE

3
icon: PPE PPE
186

Ireland PPE

For (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

B8-0677/2016 - Am 6 #

2016/06/09 Outcome: +: 517, 0: 52, -: 41
DE FR IT PL ES RO BE HU CZ BG PT NL HR FI LT SE DK SK SI GB LV MT LU AT IE EE CY EL
Total
84
63
59
46
45
26
19
18
19
15
20
23
11
12
9
14
10
11
8
29
6
6
5
17
9
4
5
17
icon: PPE PPE
187

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
154

Hungary S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2
3

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
53

Italy ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.015
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-577015_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0677_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0677_EN.html
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160609&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-06-09-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2016-06-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0280_EN.html title: T8-0280/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-06-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0280_EN.html title: T8-0280/2016
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: WERNER Martina date: 2015-06-24T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
associated
False
date
2015-06-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WERNER Martina group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0677&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0677_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0280
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0280_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0280 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0280/2016
commission
  • body: EC dg: Mobility and Transport commissioner: BULC Violeta
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
associated
False
date
2015-06-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WERNER Martina group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2015-06-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: S&D name: WERNER Martina
docs
  • date: 2016-02-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.015 title: PE577.015 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-13T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0704/2016 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0677&language=EN title: B8-0677/2016 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-18T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27330&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)612 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27330&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160609&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0280 title: T8-0280/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy on the competitiveness of the European rail supply industry (RSI). Members recalled that this industry employs 400 000 employees , invests 2.7 % of its annual turnover in R&D and accounts for 46 % of the world RSI market . The railway sector overall, including operators and infrastructure, is responsible for more than 1 million direct and 1.2 million indirect jobs in the EU. Recalling that by reason of its position as a world leader in technology and innovation, the rail supply industry has a key role to play in the Commission’s 20 % reindustrialisation target, Parliament formulated the following recommendations: Maintaining global leadership of the European rail supply industry: Parliament believed that achieving the objective of establishing a single European railway area will be crucial to maintaining the European RSI’s global dominance. It stressed that third-country competitors, especially from China, are expanding rapidly and aggressively into Europe with strong political and financial support from their country of origin (e.g. generous export credits), and highlighted the need for a fair and level playing field in global competition and for reciprocal market access in order to avert the risk of job losses and to safeguard industrial know-how in Europe. A renewed European rail industry innovation agenda: Parliament welcomed the decision to establish the ‘Shift2Rail’ Joint Undertaking and asked for swift and timely implementation of all S2R R&D activities as soon as possible. It also asked the Commission to: fully mobilise the various EU funding instruments , to explore additional sources of financing for S2R and to seek for synergies between different EU funds and with private investments; increase support for innovation projects developed by rail clusters and other initiatives that bring together RSI SMEs, larger companies and research institutes at local, regional, national and European level; consider the setting up of a forum at European level that would bring together established companies, start-ups and spin-offs which have innovative ideas for the rail sector, especially in the field of digitalisation, with a view to exchanging best practice and facilitating partnerships. Members called for swift implementation of an integrated e-ticketing system coordinated with other transport modes and other potential services provided by single-ticket operators. Getting the right skills for a future-proof rail supply industry : Parliament called for a European training and education strategy that brings together RSI companies, research institutes and social partners to jointly investigate which skills are needed for a sustainable and innovative RSI. A feasibility study towards a potential European Sectoral Skills Council on Rail should be launched in this context. The Commission was asked to encourage social dialogue in order to facilitate social innovation and foster quality long-term employment in order to contribute to the attractiveness of the sector for skilled personnel. Supporting SMEs : given that access to finance is one of the main challenges for SMEs in the RSI, Parliament stressed the added value of COSME and the Structural Funds in helping SMEs gain access to funding, including in the form of guarantee and equity facilities. It also asked the Commission to: (i) develop Sector Groups on Rail in the framework of the Enterprise Europe Network, which could advise and train RSI SMEs on different innovation funding schemes, grants, and internationalization; (ii) consider all options for support to RSI SMEs, including in the framework of a possible targeted review of the Small Business Act. Improving the European market environment for suppliers and encouraging the demand for rail products : Parliament stressed the need for a full, effective and uniform implementation of the rail network for competitive freight regulation, benefiting both passengers and industry. It welcomed the adoption of the technical pillar of the fourth Railway Package and asked for its speedy implementation as a key enabler for a real single market for rail products . Members stressed that increased interoperability and a stronger role for the European Railway Agency (ERA) will facilitate the harmonisation of the network and therefore have the potential to bring down costs for the development and authorisation of rolling stock and the European Railway Traffic Management System (ERTMS) trackside. The resolution called for further European standardisation in the railway sector and for swift implementation of the 2014 EU public procurement directives . Members called on the Commission to: evaluate whether the current set of EU competition rules should be updated to allow for strategic partnerships and alliances on the part of the European RSI; monitor non-European rail investment in EU Member States and to guarantee compliance with European public procurement legislation. Boosting investment in rail projects : Parliament expected existing EU funding instruments (e.g. CEF, Structural Funds) to be used to the full so that demand is stimulated for rail projects (including EU funding instruments for investment outside the EU such as the Pre-accession Assistance and European Neighbourhood Instrument). It highlighted the importance of a successful implementation of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) as one tool to mobilise private capital for the rail sector. It also asked the Commission to work with the multilateral development banks to help public authorities and private agencies to invest in the most sustainable and energy-efficient railway equipment around the world. Strengthening the global competitiveness of the rail supply industry : in this regard, Parliament asked the Commission to: ensure that future trade agreements (including the ongoing negotiations with Japan, China and the USA) and the revisions of existing trade agreements include specific provisions which significantly improve market access for the European RSI, especially with respect to public procurement; ensure that EU trade policy is more consistent with industrial policy, so that trade policy takes account of the needs of European industry and the new generation of trade agreements does not lead to fresh relocations and further deindustrialisation in the EU; strive to lift the major non-tariff barriers impeding access by the European rail industry to foreign markets, including barriers to investment; ensure a coherent EU trade strategy which ensures compliance with the principle of reciprocity, particularly in relation to Japan, China and the USA. Parliament supported further internationalisation of RSI , through the promotion of European standards and technologies at international level, such as the ERTMS, and by looking into how to better protect the intellectual property rights (IPRs) of the European RSI. Improving strategic political support for the sector : Parliament called on the Commission to organise a high-level industrial dialogue on the RSI with the participation of the relevant Commissioners, Members of the European Parliament, Council, Member States, rail industry, trade unions, research institutions, the European Railway Agency and European Standardisation Organisations. It also called on the Competitiveness Council to put the European RSI concretely on its agenda.
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htm title: Mobility and Transport commissioner: BULC Violeta
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/8/04654
New
  • ITRE/8/04654
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.40.03 Motor industry, cycle and motorcycle, commercial and agricultural vehicles
  • 3.40.08 Mechanical engineering, machine-tool industry
  • 3.40.14 Industrial competitiveness
New
3.40.03
Motor industry, cycle and motorcycle, commercial and agricultural vehicles
3.40.08
Mechanical engineering, machine-tool industry
3.40.14
Industrial competitiveness
procedure/subtype
Old
Debate or resolution on oral questions
New
Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0280 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0280/2016
activities/0/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
procedure/title
Old
Competitiveness of the European rail supply industry
New
Resolution on the competitiveness of the European rail supply industry
activities/0/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities
  • date: 2016-06-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MORANO Nadine group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: RIQUET Dominique group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: EFD name: BORRELLI David group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2015-06-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: WERNER Martina
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htm title: Mobility and Transport commissioner: BULC Violeta
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/8/04654
reference
2015/2887(RSP)
title
Competitiveness of the European rail supply industry
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
subtype
Debate or resolution on oral questions
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subject