Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | INTA | GRASWANDER-HAINZ Karoline ( S&D), CAMPBELL BANNERMAN David ( ECR), TAKKULA Hannu ( ALDE), BEGHIN Tiziana ( EFDD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5Events
The European Parliament adopted by 479 votes to 123, with 17 abstentions, a resolution tabled by its Committee on International Trade, on the opening of FTA negotiations with Australia and New Zealand.
Parliament recalled that the EU, Australia and New Zealand are engaged in plurilateral negotiations to further liberalise trade in green goods (Environmental Goods Agreement) and trade in services (TiSA).
It underlined the importance of deepening relations between the EU and the Asia-Pacific region for economic growth and commended both Australia and New Zealand for their strong and consistent commitment to the multilateral trade agenda.
Parliament believed that the negotiation of two separate, modern, ambitious, balanced and comprehensive FTAs with Australia and New Zealand is a pragmatic way of deepening the bilateral partnerships. It stated that the outcome of the negotiations may act as a template for future free trade agreements .
The Commission is called upon to study in depth all additional market access opportunities for European economic operators, especially SMEs, offered by the possible FTAs with Australia and New Zealand.
Members stressed that ambitious agreements between the three advanced economies must address, in a meaningful way, investment, trade in goods and services (drawing on recent European Parliament recommendations as regards policy space reservations and sensitive sectors), e-commerce, public procurement, energy, state-owned enterprises, competition, anticorruption, regulatory issues such as sanitary and phytosanitary barriers, technology research and, especially, the needs of SMEs.
The possible agreements should fully take into account, in a separate chapter, the needs and interests of SMEs with regard to market access facilitation issues in order to generate concrete business opportunities.
Agriculture : Parliament noted that agriculture is a very sensitive sector and that a final, balanced outcome in the agriculture and fisheries chapters must give due consideration to the interests of all European producers, e.g. meat, dairy, sugar, cereal and, textile producers and those in the outermost regions.
Parliament called for the inclusion of effective bilateral safeguard measures to prevent a surge in imports that would cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to European producers in sensitive sectors and for the implementation of specific measures to protect sensitive products from the outermost regions. Negotiations must result in strong and enforceable provisions covering the recognition and protection of intellectual property rights, including geographical indications (GIs).
Lastly, Parliament called on the Commission to make the launch of negotiations with Australia and New Zealand conditional on all parties committing at the outset to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible and fully respecting best practice as established in other negotiations and through constant dialogue with the social partners and civil society.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2016)269
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0064/2016
- Motion for a resolution: B8-0250/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE575.195
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE575.195
- Motion for a resolution: B8-0250/2016
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2016)269
Activities
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Michel DANTIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Alessia Maria MOSCA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Louis ALIOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard ASHWORTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louise BOURS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gianluca BUONANNO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore CICU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jane COLLINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pál CSÁKY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edward CZESAK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniel DALTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Angélique DELAHAYE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabella DE MONTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gérard DEPREZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christofer FJELLNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jacqueline FOSTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena GENTILE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beata GOSIEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Karoline GRASWANDER-HAINZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antanas GUOGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Roger HELMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hans-Olaf HENKEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mike HOOKEM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ian HUDGHTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Diane JAMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marc JOULAUD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd LUCKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Emma McCLARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louis-Joseph MANSCOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Valentinas MAZURONIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sorin MOISĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernard MONOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luigi MORGANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krisztina MORVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Margot PARKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav POCHE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marcus PRETZELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fernando RUAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ricardo SERRÃO SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Remo SERNAGIOTTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim STARBATTY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel SVOBODA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
B8-0250/2016 - Am 8 #
B8-0250/2016 - Am 9 #
B8-0250/2016 - Am 2 #
B8-0250/2016 - Am 1 #
B8-0250/2016 - Am 3/1 #
B8-0250/2016 - Am 10 #
IT | FR | IE | BE | AT | CY | LV | EL | SE | HU | ES | LU | EE | PT | NL | FI | SI | MT | DK | LT | GB | HR | SK | BG | CZ | RO | DE | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
64
|
61
|
9
|
18
|
17
|
4
|
6
|
18
|
16
|
14
|
43
|
5
|
5
|
20
|
25
|
12
|
7
|
6
|
13
|
9
|
43
|
11
|
10
|
16
|
20
|
28
|
70
|
42
|
|
GUE/NGL |
48
|
3
|
France GUE/NGLAbstain (1) |
4
|
2
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
41
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (8)Against (2) |
|||||||||||||
ENF |
31
|
Italy ENFFor (3)Abstain (2) |
France ENFFor (17)Bernard MONOT, Dominique BILDE, Dominique MARTIN, Gilles LEBRETON, Jean-François JALKH, Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER, Joëlle MÉLIN, Louis ALIOT, Marie-Christine ARNAUTU, Marie-Christine BOUTONNET, Marine LE PEN, Mireille D'ORNANO, Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI, Nicolas BAY, Philippe LOISEAU, Sophie MONTEL, Steeve BRIOIS
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
31
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (2) |
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
10
|
2
|
Greece NIFor (1)Against (3) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
S&D |
152
|
Italy S&DFor (1)Against (3)Abstain (21)
Alessia Maria MOSCA,
Andrea COZZOLINO,
Caterina CHINNICI,
Cécile Kashetu KYENGE,
Daniele VIOTTI,
Enrico GASBARRA,
Flavio ZANONATO,
Gianni PITTELLA,
Isabella DE MONTE,
Luigi MORGANO,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Michela GIUFFRIDA,
Nicola CAPUTO,
Nicola DANTI,
Paolo DE CASTRO,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pier Antonio PANZERI,
Renata BRIANO,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Silvia COSTA,
Simona BONAFÈ
|
France S&DFor (2)Against (4) |
1
|
4
|
Austria S&DFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (3) |
1
|
1
|
Greece S&DAgainst (1)Abstain (3) |
5
|
4
|
Spain S&DFor (1)Against (5) |
1
|
1
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (2) |
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (10) |
2
|
2
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
4
|
Romania S&DAgainst (4) |
Germany S&DAgainst (5) |
3
|
|
ECR |
60
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Denmark ECRFor (1)Against (3) |
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (12) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
Poland ECRAgainst (17)
Anna FOTYGA,
Beata GOSIEWSKA,
Bolesław G. PIECHA,
Czesław HOC,
Edward CZESAK,
Karol KARSKI,
Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Marek JUREK,
Mirosław PIOTROWSKI,
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO,
Ryszard CZARNECKI,
Stanisław OŻÓG,
Sławomir KŁOSOWSKI,
Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA,
Zbigniew KUŹMIUK,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
|
||||||||||||
ALDE |
65
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Spain ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (7) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
Lithuania ALDEAgainst (4) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
|||||||
PPE |
174
|
France PPEFor (1)Against (14) |
3
|
Belgium PPEFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
Austria PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
1
|
2
|
Greece PPE |
3
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
3
|
1
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (6) |
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
3
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Croatia PPEAgainst (5) |
5
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (7) |
Romania PPEAgainst (11) |
Germany PPEAgainst (25)
Albert DESS,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Burkhard BALZ,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Herbert REUL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner LANGEN
|
Poland PPEAgainst (20)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Julia PITERA,
Marek PLURA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
B8-0250/2016 - Am 11 #
B8-0250/2016 - Am 4 #
B8-0250/2016 - Am 6 #
B8-0250/2016 - Am 7 #
CY | IE | EL | LU | LV | EE | SI | MT | SE | NL | AT | LT | HU | DK | FI | HR | SK | FR | PT | CZ | BG | BE | IT | ES | GB | RO | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
4
|
9
|
16
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
7
|
6
|
16
|
24
|
17
|
9
|
15
|
13
|
12
|
11
|
10
|
59
|
20
|
18
|
15
|
18
|
67
|
41
|
43
|
28
|
44
|
71
|
|
GUE/NGL |
46
|
2
|
4
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
France GUE/NGL |
4
|
2
|
3
|
Spain GUE/NGLFor (8)Against (1) |
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
|||||||||||||||
ENF |
30
|
4
|
3
|
Italy ENF |
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
30
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDD |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
12
|
Greece NIFor (1)Against (3) |
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
41
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (2)Abstain (4) |
Germany Verts/ALE |
|||||||||||||
ECR |
63
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (13) |
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (19)
Anna FOTYGA,
Beata GOSIEWSKA,
Bolesław G. PIECHA,
Czesław HOC,
Edward CZESAK,
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA,
Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI,
Karol KARSKI,
Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Marek JUREK,
Mirosław PIOTROWSKI,
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO,
Ryszard CZARNECKI,
Stanisław OŻÓG,
Sławomir KŁOSOWSKI,
Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA,
Zbigniew KUŹMIUK,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
|
Germany ECRFor (1)Against (5) |
||||||||||||
ALDE |
62
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
Lithuania ALDEAgainst (4) |
3
|
3
|
2
|
France ALDEAgainst (6) |
2
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
||||||||
S&D |
151
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
2
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
10
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (8) |
3
|
4
|
4
|
Italy S&DAgainst (27)
Alessia Maria MOSCA,
Andrea COZZOLINO,
Brando BENIFEI,
Caterina CHINNICI,
Cécile Kashetu KYENGE,
Damiano ZOFFOLI,
Daniele VIOTTI,
David Maria SASSOLI,
Elena GENTILE,
Elly SCHLEIN,
Enrico GASBARRA,
Flavio ZANONATO,
Gianni PITTELLA,
Goffredo Maria BETTINI,
Isabella DE MONTE,
Luigi MORGANO,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Michela GIUFFRIDA,
Nicola CAPUTO,
Nicola DANTI,
Paolo DE CASTRO,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pier Antonio PANZERI,
Renata BRIANO,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Silvia COSTA,
Simona BONAFÈ
|
United Kingdom S&DAgainst (13) |
3
|
Germany S&DAgainst (17) |
|||
PPE |
174
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (4) |
Austria PPEAgainst (5) |
1
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
1
|
3
|
Croatia PPEAgainst (5) |
5
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (6) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (7) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (5) |
4
|
Romania PPEAgainst (11) |
Poland PPEAgainst (20)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Julia PITERA,
Marek PLURA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
Germany PPEAgainst (27)
Albert DESS,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Burkhard BALZ,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Herbert REUL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner LANGEN
|
B8-0250/2016 - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
70 |
2015/2932(RSP)
2016/01/13
INTA
70 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Citation 11 a (new) - having regard to the sensitive nature of certain agricultural sectors in these negotiations, such as the beef, dairy, sugar and cereals sectors,
Amendment 10 #
Recital H H. whereas the EU concluded negotiations on the EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation (PARC) on 30 July 2014 and on the EU- Australia Framework Agreement (FA) on 22 April 2015; whereas a deepening of relations with Australia and New Zealand could be pursuit through the negotiation of preferential trade agreements;
Amendment 11 #
Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the collection and transmission, in the context of the Echelon network, of sensitive economic and commercial information by Australia and New Zealand to the detriment of European enterprises was, however, regrettable;
Amendment 12 #
Recital K K. whereas the conclusion of
Amendment 13 #
Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas the sensitive nature of certain sectors, and particularly the agricultural sector, must be duly taken into account in the future negotiations;
Amendment 14 #
Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the importance of deepening relations between the EU and the Asia- Pacific region for economic growth within Europe and stresses that this should be reflected in the European Union's trade policy;
Amendment 15 #
Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the importance of the Asia- Pacific region
Amendment 16 #
Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the importance of the Asia- Pacific region for economic growth within
Amendment 17 #
Paragraph 1 1. Underlines the importance of the Asia- Pacific region for economic growth within Europe and
Amendment 18 #
Paragraph 2 2. Commends both Australia and New Zealand for their
Amendment 19 #
Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the full potential of the Union's bilateral and regional co-operation strategies may only be realised by concluding high-quality FTAs with both Australia and New Zealand while under no circumstances undermining or diverting resources and attention away from the ambition to achieve progress multilaterally or the implementation of already concluded agreements;
Amendment 2 #
Citation 11 b (new) - having regard to the already significant number of agreements being negotiated between the EU and its main trading partners,
Amendment 20 #
Paragraph 3 3. Considers that
Amendment 21 #
Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the full potential of the Union's bilateral and regional co-operation strategies may only be realised by concluding high-quality FTAs with both Australia and New Zealand while under no circumstances undermining or diverting resources and attention away from the ambition to achieve progress multilaterally or to advance ongoing bilateral negotiations;
Amendment 22 #
Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the full potential of the Union's bilateral and regional co-operation strategies may only be realised by concluding high-quality FTAs with both Australia and New Zealand in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit while under no circumstances undermining or diverting resources and attention away from the ambition to achieve progress multilaterally;
Amendment 23 #
Paragraph 4 Amendment 24 #
Paragraph 4 4. Believes that the negotiation of modern, ambitious, balanced and comprehensive FTAs with Australia and New Zealand
Amendment 25 #
Paragraph 4 4. Believes that the negotiation of modern, ambitious, balanced and comprehensive FTAs with Australia and New Zealand is a logical step in deepening the bilateral partnerships, further reinforcing already mature existing bilateral trade and investment relationships
Amendment 26 #
Paragraph 4 4. Believes that the negotiation of modern, ambitious, balanced and comprehensive FTAs with Australia and New Zealand is a
Amendment 27 #
Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that Australia and New Zealand each present specific economic and trade characteristics and challenges and that in view of this, the negotiations with each of them should be conducted separately;
Amendment 28 #
Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the European Union to adapt its trade negotiations with Australia and New Zealand to the specific features of the economies of these two countries;
Amendment 29 #
Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to study in depth a
Amendment 3 #
Recital B B. whereas the EU, Australia and New Zealand work together in tackling common challenges across a broad spectrum of issues and co-operate in a number of international fora
Amendment 30 #
Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to study in depth any additional market access opportunities for European economic operators, especially SMEs, offered by the possible FTAs with Australia and New Zealand during the scoping exercise and to weigh these against any possible defensive interests, also considering that both Australia and New Zealand have already comparatively open markets;
Amendment 31 #
Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 32 #
Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to study in depth any additional market access opportunities for European economic operators offered by the possible FTAs with Australia and New Zealand during the scoping exercise and to weigh these against
Amendment 33 #
Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to study in depth any additional market access opportunities for European economic operators offered by the possible FTAs with Australia and New Zealand during the scoping exercise and to weigh these against any possible defensive interests,
Amendment 34 #
Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that ambitious agreements between the three advanced economies must address, in a meaningful way, investment and investment protection, trade in goods and services
Amendment 35 #
Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that ambitious agreements between the three advanced economies must address, in a meaningful way, investment, trade in goods and services (drawing on recent
Amendment 36 #
Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that ambitious agreements between the three advanced economies must address, in a meaningful way, investment, trade in goods and services (drawing on recent practice as regards reservations of policy space and sector coverage), e-commerce, public procurement, energy, state-owned enterprises, competition, anti-corruption
Amendment 37 #
Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that ambitious agreements between the three advanced economies
Amendment 38 #
Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 39 #
Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that ambitious agreements between the three advanced economies must address, in a meaningful way, investment
Amendment 4 #
Recital E E. whereas Australia and New Zealand are both parties to the recently concluded negotiations for a Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the on-going negotiations on a Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in East Asia, uniting Australia's and New Zealand's most important trading partners;
Amendment 40 #
Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that ambitious agreements between the three advanced economies must address, in a meaningful way, investment, trade in goods and services (drawing on recent practice as regards reservations of policy space and sector coverage), e-commerce, public procurement, energy, state-owned
Amendment 41 #
Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Envisages the outcome of the negotiations to act as a template for a new generation of free trade agreements, stressing the importance to further raising ambitions and to deepen the liberalisation, pushing the boundaries for what a modern FTA entails, considering the highly developed economies and regulatory environments in both New Zealand and Australia;
Amendment 42 #
Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasizes that the possible agreements should fully take into account, in a separate chapter, the needs and interests of SMEs related to the market access facilitation issues in order to generate concrete business opportunities;
Amendment 43 #
Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that the European Union must give itself the legal means to negotiate with due care the opening and closing of its public procurement markets in the framework of trade talks with partner countries, and considers that putting in place a European instrument for reciprocity in public procurement markets is necessary in this regard;
Amendment 44 #
Paragraph 7 Amendment 45 #
Paragraph 7 7. Considers a robust and ambitious sustainable development chapter, covering core labour standards and
Amendment 46 #
Paragraph 7 7. Considers a robust and ambitious sustainable development chapter, covering core labour standards and the four ILO priority governance conventions and multilateral environmental agreements an indispensable part of any potential free trade agreement; the agreement should also include the establishment of a joint civil society forum that monitors and comments on its implementation and the parties' respect for their commitments and obligations on human rights, labour standards and environmental protection;
Amendment 47 #
Paragraph 7 7. Considers a
Amendment 48 #
Paragraph 7 7. Considers a robust and ambitious sustainable development chapter, covering core labour standards
Amendment 49 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that a balanced outcome in agriculture chapters that takes sensitivities duly into account can boost competitiveness and will be beneficial to
Amendment 5 #
Recital F Amendment 50 #
Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 51 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that a balanced outcome in
Amendment 52 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that only a balanced outcome in agriculture
Amendment 53 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that a balanced outcome in agriculture chapters that takes sensitivities duly into account can boost competitiveness and will be beneficial to both consumers and producers; calls for the inclusion of effective bilateral safeguard measures to prevent a surge in imports that would cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to producers and for the implementation of specific measures to protect sensitive products from the outermost regions, in particular the exclusion of special sugars;
Amendment 54 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that a balanced outcome in agriculture chapters that takes the interests of European producers, particularly those in the outermost regions, and sensitivities duly into account can boost competitiveness and will be beneficial to both consumers and producers; calls on the Commission to exclude the most sensitive sectors from the negotiations or to foresee transitional periods and appropriate quotas; calls for the inclusion of effective bilateral safeguard measures to prevent a surge in imports that would cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to producers;
Amendment 55 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that a balanced outcome in agriculture chapters that takes sensitivities duly into account can boost competitiveness and will be beneficial to both consumers and producers; calls for the inclusion of effective bilateral safeguard measures to prevent a surge in imports that would cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to producers, particularly those in the meat, dairy, sugar and textile sectors;
Amendment 56 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that a
Amendment 57 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that
Amendment 58 #
Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that any agreement is in alignment with the EU's previous commitments, allowing for the full functioning of the digital ecosystem, and promoting the cross- border data flows processed for legitimate purposes; to ensure that the agreements prohibit any requirements on ICT service suppliers to use local infrastructure, or establish a local presence, as a condition of supplying services;
Amendment 59 #
Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of strong and enforceable provisions covering the protection of intellectual property rights
Amendment 6 #
Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas Australia and New Zealand are two countries fully characterised by the rule of law and that currently offer strong protection for the environment as well as strong protection for human, social and labour rights;
Amendment 60 #
Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of strong and enforceable provisions covering the protection of intellectual property rights
Amendment 61 #
Paragraph 9 9. Stresses th
Amendment 62 #
Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of strong and enforceable provisions covering the recognition and protection of intellectual property rights and geographical indications (GIs);
Amendment 63 #
Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Considers a robust and ambitious sustainable development chapter, covering core labour standards and the four ILO priority governance conventions and multilateral environmental agreements an indispensable part of any potential free trade agreement;
Amendment 64 #
Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to conduct as soon as possible comprehensive sustainability impact assessments of the potential agreements to be able to thoroughly evaluate possible gains in enhancing the EU-Australia and EU-New Zealand trade and investment relationships to the benefit of the population and businesses on both sides;
Amendment 65 #
Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to conduct as soon as possible comprehensive sustainability impact assessments of the potential agreements to be able to thoroughly evaluate
Amendment 66 #
Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the
Amendment 67 #
Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to conduct as soon as possible comprehensive sustainability impact assessments of the potential agreements to be able to thoroughly evaluate possible gains in enhancing the EU-Australia and EU-New Zealand trade and investment relationships to the benefit of the population on both sides, and calls on it to assess the impact of such agreements on the outermost regions of the EU, particularly with regard to sugar production;
Amendment 68 #
Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to condition the launch of negotiations with Australia and New Zealand with all parties committing at the outset to conduct negotiations in the most transparent way
Amendment 69 #
Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to condition the launch of negotiations with Australia and New Zealand with all parties committing at the outset to conduct negotiations in
Amendment 7 #
Recital G Amendment 70 #
Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission to take account of the interests of the overseas countries and territories in the region during the negotiations on these free trade agreements;
Amendment 8 #
Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 9 #
Recital G G. whereas for further deepening of the trade and investment relationship
source: 575.195
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/0/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.195New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-575195_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0250_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0250_EN.html |
events/0/docs |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
committees/0/date |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0250&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0250_EN.html |
docs/2/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0064New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0064_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
INTA/8/04884New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
Debate or resolution on oral questionsNew
Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation |
procedure/title |
Old
Opening of FTA negotiations with Australia and New ZealandNew
Resolution on the opening of FTA negotiations with Australia and New Zealand |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/0/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate scheduled |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|