Awaiting committee decision
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2017/09/11
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | DEVE | ||
Opinion | ENVI | TĂNĂSESCU Claudiu Ciprian (S&D) | |
Lead | PECH | MATO Gabriel (EPP) | BRIANO Renata (S&D), VAN DALEN Peter (ECR), TORVALDS Nils (ALDE), NÍ RIADA Liadh (GUE/NGL), AFFRONTE Marco (Verts/ALE) |
Legal Basis TFEU 043-p2
Activites
-
2017/09/11
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
-
2016/04/11
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2016/03/11
Legislative proposal published
-
COM(2016)0134
summary
PURPOSE: to change the governance structure of technical measures on the conservation of fishery resources in order to optimise the contribution of technical measures to achieving the key objectives of the new Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: technical measures are rules governing how and where fishermen may fish. They aim to control the catch that can be taken with a given amount of fishing effort and also to minimise the impacts of fishing on the ecosystem. They concern: (i) measures that regulate the operation of the gear; (ii) minimum sizes below which fish must be returned to the sea; (iii) measures that set spatial and temporal controls to protect aggregations of juvenile or spawning fish; (iv) measures that mitigate the impacts of fishing gears on sensitive species or closed areas to protect sensitive habitats. The history of technical measures applying in European fisheries legislation within the framework of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) is one of numerous regulations, amendments, implementing rules and temporary technical measures introduced as stop-gaps to resolve emerging problems. Across all Union sea basins and non-Union waters in which Union vessels operate there are more than 30 regulations which contain technical measures. With the new challenges of the new CFP, which came into force on 1 January 2014, the retrospective evaluation concluded that the current regulatory structure for technical measures will continue to be sub-optimal. This is because of five identifiable problems: sub-optimal performance: technical measures provide little incentive to fish selectively where there is no cost to discarding, or of catching sensitive species or impacting adversely on the seabed; difficult to measure effectiveness: the current regulations do not contain any defined metrics on which to measure success; prescriptive and complex rules: some measures are difficult for control authorities to enforce, and for fishermen to comply with; lack of flexibility: technical measures are mostly decided following a complex, inflexible and lengthy politically-driven process which is not well suited to defining detailed technical rules that need frequent updating and periodic review; insufficient involvement of key stakeholders in the decision-making process. These repeated failures to reach agreement on a new technical measures regulation clearly highlight the need for a new approach which aims to change the governance structure of technical measures rather than making wholesale changes to the measures themselves, the improved flexibility and incentives for fishing selectivity it introduces will deliver improvements in the effectiveness of technical measures. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred approach is that of a new framework Regulation containing a) general provisions (scope, objectives, guiding principles) and definition of the expected results and corresponding standards; b) common rules and technical provisions; and c) baseline standards (by region) corresponding to identified results which would function as default measures in the context of regionalisation. The preferred option largely presents changes to the regulatory structure and governance of technical measures. Few new measures are introduced and any changes to the substance are very much about deletion of rules in order to simplify and lessen administrative burden, improve controllability or consolidate nature conservation measures. CONTENT: the proposal has the following structure: Subject matter: the proposed Regulation lays down technical measures concerning: (a) the taking and landing of fisheries resources; and (b) the operation of fishing gears and the interaction of fishing activities with marine ecosystems. The proposal contains general provisions, overarching and specific objectives, targets linked to the general and specific objectives expressed in terms of levels of unwanted catches; thresholds for bycatches of sensitive species; and reduction in the extent of the seabed significantly affected by fishing; principles of good governance and definitions. The definitions relate primarily to the definition of fishing gears and fishing operations and are common to all regions. They consolidate and update the existing definitions contained in the existing Regulations. Common technical measures: the proposal contains common rules currently contained in all of the primary technical measures regulations but applicable to all sea basins and considered as de facto permanent as there is no need or justification for changing them. The provisions included under this part are: prohibited gears and practices including prohibition on the sale of marine species caught using certain gear types, measures to protect sensitive species (e.g. marine mammals, reptiles and seabirds) and habitats (e.g. coldwater corals) including those listed in the Habitats and Birds Directives; general restrictions on the use of towed gears and conditions for their use (covers basic codend construction and permissible attachments to fishing gears); restrictions on the use of static nets. This includes the consolidation of the existing restrictions on the use of driftnets (i.e. prohibition to use drift nets above 2.5km, prohibition on using such gears to target highly migratory species and the total prohibition on the use of driftnets in the Baltic). Under regionalisation Member States should strengthen these provisions up to and including the introduction of a total prohibition on the use of such gears where there is scientific evidence that shows the continued use of driftnets constitutes a threat to the conservation status of sensitive species in that region; minimum conservation reference sizes; common measures to reduce discarding. Regionalisation: regionalisation sets the general principles for regionalisation with reference to baseline measures which will apply where no regional measures are in places and establishes the empowerments needed for regionalisation of technical measures through multiannual plans, temporary discard plans and conservation measures necessary for compliance with obligations under environmental legislation. The regional measures that can be taken under temporary discard plans are also defined, as well as safeguards that will be taken if scientific evidence shows that the conservation objectives are not being met by the regional measures. To this effect, a safeguard clause is included that allows the Commission to act where available scientific advice indicates that immediate action is required to protect marine species. Such measures could include restrictions on the use fishing gears or on fishing activities in certain areas or during certain periods. Technical Measures in non-Union waters: the Commission may adopt delegated acts in respect of existing detailed rules concerning lists of vulnerable marine ecosystems and also specific technical measures related to defined fisheries for blue ling and redfish agreed by the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC). Annexes: the Annexes contain baseline measures by sea basin (i.e. North Sea, Baltic, Northwestern waters, Southwestern waters, Mediterranean, Black Sea and the outermost regions). These baseline measures will apply in the absence of measures being put in place regionally. There are also annexes containing a list of prohibited species that if caught as bycatches must be returned immediately to the sea; closed areas established for the protection of sensitive habitats and a list of species that are prohibited for capture with driftnets. Reporting: by the end of 2020 and every third year thereafter, the Commission will report on the implementation of this Regulation including an assessment of the impact of technical measures on the conservation of fisheries resources and on the environmental impacts of fisheries on marine ecosystems. On the basis of that report, the Commission will propose any necessary amendments. DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en', 'title': 'Maritime Affairs and Fisheries'}, VELLA Karmenu
-
COM(2016)0134
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2016)0134
Amendments | Dossier |
102 |
2016/0074(COD)
2017/02/07
ENVI
102 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 2. In accordance with the procedure set out in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 Member States may submit joint recommendations defining appropriate technical measures at the regional level that deviate from the measures set out in paragraph 1. In doing so Member States should aim at involving to the greatest extent all relevant stakeholders.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 2. In accordance with the procedure set out in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. Technical measures recommended in accordance with paragraph 2 shall
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. Technical measures recommended in accordance with paragraph 2 shall
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – title Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall be empowered to establish technical measures at regional level with the aim of achieving objectives of multiannual plans referred to in Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. Such measures shall be established by means of delegated acts adopted in accordance with Article 32 of this Regulation and Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. Notwithstanding Article 18(1) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, the Commission may adopt such delegated acts also in the absence of a joint recommendation referred to in those paragraphs.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall be empowered to establish technical measures at regional level with the aim of achieving objectives of multiannual plans referred to in Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 – point c Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. The adoption of the technical measures, pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2, shall be conditional upon a positive assessment by the STECF
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Amendments to the closed or restricted areas listed in Part C of Annexes V to VIII and X and Part B of Annex XI shall only take place when scientific assessments required in line with Article 19(6) give a positive assessment to the amendments proposed.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – introductory part When Member States submit joint recommendations in accordance with Article 19 to allow for the creation of real- time closures and moving on provisions with the aim of ensuring the protection of aggregations of juveniles or spawning fish or shellfish species or sensitive species, they shall include the following elements:
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. When Member States submit joint recommendations in accordance with Article 19 to allow for the use or extend the use of innovative fishing gears including the pulse trawl as described in Part E of Annex V within a specific sea basin, they shall provide an assessment of the likely impacts of using such gears on the targeted species
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. Those assessments shall be evaluated by the STECF or the ICES or any other scientific institute.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. The use of innovative fishing gears shall
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. The use of innovative fishing gears shall
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. The use of innovative fishing gears shall
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. The use of innovative fishing gears shall not be permitted where those assessments indicate that their use will lead to substantial negative impacts on sensitive habitats and non-target species.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall aim at achieving the
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph a (a) transpose into Union law
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 3 3. Delegated acts referred to in paragraph 1 shall apply for a period of no more than
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) Articles 3, 8, 9, 10, 11,
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex IX – part 3 – paragraph 2 The length of
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex IX – part B – paragraph 1 – column 3 – row 3 Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex IX – part B – paragraph 1 – row 4 a (new) At least 10mm Adriatic Sea Fishing with beach seines targeting fish species of the family Atherinidae
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) Simplification of the existing rules is necessary for a better understanding and acceptance by operators, national authorities and stakeholders; participation in decision-making from the sector should be encouraged; attention should be paid for standards on conservation and sustainability not to be weakened;
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Technical measures where relevant should apply to recreational fisheries which can have a significant impact on the marine environment, stocks of fish and
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Technical measures
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8 a) The incidental catching and killing of protected species should be addressed in a comprehensive manner across all fisheries and gear types in view of the strict level of protection they are afforded under Council Directive 92/43/EEC, their high level of vulnerability and the obligation to achieve a good environmental status by 2020.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) To evaluate the effectiveness of technical measures, targets relating to the levels of unwanted catches; to the level of bycatches of sensitive species and to the extent of seabed habitats adversely affected by fishing; should be established that reflect the objectives of the CFP, and are coherent with Union environmental legislation (in particular
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9 a) When setting targets for bycatch in this Regulation, the implementation of the landing obligation should seriously be taken into account, as well as the variability among fish species and fishing gears concerning bycatch percentages. A generic target applying for all fish species and fish stocks is unrealistic, especially when it concerns mixed fisheries.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Certain destructive fishing gears or methods which use explosives, poisons, stupefying substances, electric current, pneumatic hammers or other percussive instruments; towed devices and grabs for harvesting red coral or other type of corals and coral-like species and certain spear- guns are and should be prohibited
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15)
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) The practi
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) Where no technical measures are in place at regional level then defined baseline standards should apply. Those baseline standards should be derived from existing technical measures, taking account of STECF advice and the opinions of stakeholders.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) Where no technical measures are in place at regional level then defined baseline standards should apply. Those baseline standards should be derived from existing technical measures, taking account of STECF advice and the opinions of stakeholders. They should consist of baseline mesh sizes for towed gears and static nets, minimum conservation reference sizes, closed or restricted areas, nature conservation measures to mitigate against and, where possible, eliminate, bycatches of marine mammals and seabirds in certain areas and any other regionally specific measures currently in existence that are still required to ensure conservation objectives continue to be met until such times measures are put in place under regionalisation.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Member States, in conjunction with stakeholders
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Such regional technical measures should
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26 a) Regionalisation should be used as a tool to encourage the participation of all relevant stakeholders, including NGOs, and empower fishermen and their engagement so that they can work in close cooperation with Member-States, Advisory Councils and scientists to create tailor-made measures that consider the specificities of each fishing areas and safeguard their environmental conditions;
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 b (new) (26 b) Decisions taken by regional groups of Member States under regionalisation should meet the same standards of democratic oversight as those in the concerned Member States.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27)
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 a (new) 27a. Where there is a direct management interest concerning a single Member State, proposals for individual technical measures may be submitted, to modify existing conservation measures, subject to consultation of the relevant Advisory Councils.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) In developing joint recommendations to adopt alternative size and species selective gears to the baseline mesh sizes
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) In developing joint recommendations to amend or establish new closed or restricted areas
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) In developing joint recommendations to amend or establish minimum conservation reference sizes
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) In developing joint recommendations to amend or establish minimum conservation reference sizes in multiannual plans, regional groups of Member States should ensure the objectives of the CFP are
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) The creation of real-time closures in conjunction with moving-on provisions as an additional measure for the protection of juveniles or spawning aggregations or sensitive species should be allowed as an option to be developed under joint recommendations. The conditions for the establishment and lifting of such areas as well as the control and monitoring arrangements should be defined in the relevant joint recommendations.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) On the basis of scientific assessment of the impacts of innovative gears, duly evaluated by the STECF or ICES, the use of such or extension to the use of novel gears, such as the electric pulse trawl
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) In order to minimise and, where possible, eliminate the bycatches of sensitive species and impacts of fishing gears on sensitive habitats, regional groups of Member States should develop additional mitigation measures
Amendment 54 #
(
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to update the list of fish and shellfish for which directed fishing is prohibited; to update the list of sensitive areas where fishing should be restricted; to adopt technical measures as part of multiannual plans; and to adopt technical measures as part of temporary discard plans. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level and based on STECF assessment. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 a (new) (43 a) at present the United Kingdom currently shares its waters with the European Union, the United Kingdom's exit from the European Union will mean these waters are under the sole jurisdiction of the United Kingdom. To that end encourages the European Commission to engage with the United Kingdom government on future regulation that will effect both waters.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the operation of fishing gears and the interaction of
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation shall apply to a
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. As tools to support the implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), technical measures shall contribute to the objectives of the CFP set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and in particular in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 5(a), (i) and (j) of that Article.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) optimise exploitation patterns to provide adequate protection for juveniles and spawning aggregations of marine species;
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) ensure that bycatches of marine species listed under Directives 92/43/EEC and 2009/147/EC and other sensitive species that result from fishing are minimised and where possible eliminated
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) ensure that the environmental impacts of fishing on marine habitats are minimised and where possible eliminated
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) ensure that the criteria provided for Descriptors 1, 3, 4 and 6, laid down in Part B of the Annex to the Commission Decision 2010/477/EU, are fulfilled.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ensure that catches of marine species below minimum conservation reference sizes do not exceed
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ensure that catches of marine species below minimum conservation reference sizes
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ensure that catches of marine species below minimum conservation reference sizes do not exceed 5%
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ensure that bycatches of marine mammals, marine reptiles, seabirds and other non-commercially exploited species
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ensure that bycatches of marine mammals, marine reptiles, seabirds and other non-commercially exploited species do not exceed levels provided for in
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) ensure that the environmental impacts of fishing activities on
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) ensure that the environmental impacts of fishing activities on seabed habitats do not exceed the levels needed to achieve good environmental status for each habitat type assessed in the framework of Directive 2008/56/EC in each marine region or subregion
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) ensure that the environmental impacts of fishing activities on seabed habitats do not exceed the levels needed to achieve good environmental status for each relevant habitat type assessed in the framework of Directive 2008/56/EC in each marine region or subregion in relation to both habitat quality and the spatial extent over which the required levels need to be achieved.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) ensure that by-catches of unwanted fish are progressively and gradually eliminated with the aim of ensuring that the criteria provided for Descriptors 1, 3 and 4, laid down in Part B of the Annex to the Commission Decision 2010/477/EU, are fulfilled.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) 'North Sea' means Union waters of ICES divisions34 IIa, IIIa and IV; _________________ 34 ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) divisions are as defined in Regulation (EC) No 218/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on the submission of nominal catch statistics by Member States fishing in the north-east Atlantic OJ L 87, 31.3.2009, p. 70.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) 'North Western waters' means Union waters of ICES sub-areas V (excluding Va and non-Union waters of Vb), VI and VII;
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (1) 'exploitation pattern' means how fishing
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) 'selective fishing' means a fishing method's ability to target and capture fish or shellfish by size and species type during the fishing operation allowing non-target species and juveniles of regulated species to be avoided or released unharmed;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) 'directed fishing' means fishing for a defined species or combination of species where the total catch of that/those species makes up more than 50%
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 8 (8) 'small pelagic species' means mackerel, herring, horse mackerel, anchovy, sardine, blue whiting, argentine, sprat, boarfish, squid, sandeel and Norway pout;
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 9 (9) 'recreational fisheries' means non- commercial fishing activities exploiting marine living
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new) (9a) 'traditional fisheries' means non- commercial fishing activities exploiting marine living aquatic resources on a limited scale at local level, exclusively for personal needs and using only traditional fishing gear and techniques;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 10 (10) 'Advisory Councils' means stakeholder groups established
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 10 (10) 'Advisory Councils' means stakeholder groups established under the CFP to promote a balanced representation of all stakeholders and to contribute to the achievement of
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new) (17a) 'shore seines' means surrounding nets and towed seines set from a boat and towed from the shore or from a boat moored or anchored to the shore;
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 42 (42) 'high grading' means the practice, of discarding low priced fish that are subject to catch limits, even though they
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) electric current except
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 2, this article shall apply to waters on the high seas and to the waters of third countries.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing detailed rules for the specification of codends and the devices referred to in paragraph 3. Those implementing acts shall be based on the best available scientific and technical advice, as well as available advice from the Regional Advisory Committees and may define:
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. In traditional fisheries it shall be permitted to use only bottom-set gillnets whose total length is not more than 200 metres per vessel.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. Where the best available scientific advice indicates that an amendment of the list in Annex I is necessary through the addition of new species which require protection or the deletion of species which no longer require to remain on the list, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt such amendments by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 32.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 4. On the basis of the best available scientific advice a Member State may put in place for vessels flying its flag, mitigation measures or restrictions on the use of certain gears pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. Such measures shall minimise and where possible eliminate the catches of the species referred to in paragraph 1 or other species caught incidentally and shall be compatible with the objectives set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 1380/2013 and be at least as stringent as technical measures applicable under Union law.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. Where the best available scientific advice recommends an amendment of the list of areas in Annex II, including the addition of new areas, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt such amendments by means of delegated acts, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 11(2) and 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 1380/2013. When adopting such amendments, the Commission shall provide a full mapping of the vulnerable area and give particular attention to the mitigation of negative socio-economic and environmental effects of the displacement of fishing activity to other sensitive areas.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ensuring adequat
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – title source: 599.634
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0134:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0134:EN
|
activities/0 |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
activities/0 |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
543c6d5fd1d1c50f14000000New
53b2d6fdb819f205b0000002 |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/4/name |
Old
ENGSTRÖM LinnéaNew
AFFRONTE Marco |
activities/2 |
|
committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
543c6d5fd1d1c50f14000000New
53b2d6fdb819f205b0000002 |
committees/2/shadows/4/name |
Old
ENGSTRÖM LinnéaNew
AFFRONTE Marco |
links/Research document |
|
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0134:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0134:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0134:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0134:EN
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2017-03-13T00:00:00New
2016-03-11T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
51ec5983b819f2575200010cNew
53b2d7d9b819f205b000002b |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/0/name |
Old
CORBETT RichardNew
BRIANO Renata |
committees/2/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
51ec5983b819f2575200010cNew
53b2d7d9b819f205b000002b |
committees/2/shadows/0/name |
Old
CORBETT RichardNew
BRIANO Renata |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/3 |
|
committees/2/shadows/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2016-04-27T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2016-04-27T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/4 |
|
committees/2/shadows/3 |
|
committees/2/shadows/4 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/2 |
|
committees/2/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows |
|
committees/2/shadows |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2016-04-12T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2016-04-12T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
PECH/8/06008
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
committees/2/date |
2016-03-22T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
committees/2/date |
2016-03-22T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|