Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA Agustín ( PPE) | FAJON Tanja ( S&D), HALLA-AHO Jussi ( ECR), MLINAR Angelika ( ALDE), ALBRECHT Jan Philipp ( Verts/ALE), VON STORCH Beatrix ( EFDD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 077-p2
Legal Basis:
TFEU 077-p2Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to amend the Schengen Borders Code as regards the entry / exit system for third-country nationals crossing external borders.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2017/2225 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the use of the Entry/Exit System (EES).
CONTENT: this Regulation amends Regulation (EU) 2016/399 on the Schengen Borders Code to take account of the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the creation of a centralised system for the registration of entry and exit data and refusal of entry data concerning third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the Union for a short stay.
The Regulation:
amends the entry requirements for third-country nationals by including an obligation to provide biometric data where such data must be provided by third-country nationals for the purpose of border checks. In case of refusal to provide biometric data, a refusal of entry decision will be taken. Data on third-country nationals whose entry for a short stay has been refused will be recorded in the EES; now provides for the verification of the identity and the nationality of the third-country national and of the authenticity and validity of the travel document for crossing the border, including by consulting the relevant databases , in particular: (i) the Schengen Information System (SIS) ); (ii) the Interpol Stolen and Lost Travel Document Database (SLTD); and (iii) national databases containing information on stolen, misappropriated, lost or invalid travel documents; aims to abolish on entry and exit the stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals admitted for a short stay by replacing it by the electronic recording of the entry and exit directly in the EES. However, where provided expressly by its national law, a Member State may, on entry and exit, stamp the travel document of third-country nationals holding a residence permit or long-stay visa issued by that Member State; allows Member States to decide whether and to what extent to make use of technologies such as self-service systems, e-gates and automated border control systems. When using such technologies, an appropriate level of security should be ensured. The results of border checks carried out by automated means must be available to border guards so as to enable them to take the appropriate decisions; allows Member States to establish national facilitation programmes on a voluntary basis in order to allow pre-vetted third-country nationals to benefit on entry from derogations from certain aspects of thorough checks; provides for transitional measures for those Member States that are not yet implementing the EES: the latter will have to continue to systematically stamp travel documents of third-country nationals admitted for a short stay, on entry and exit.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 29.12.2017.
The European Parliament adopted by 496 votes to 137 with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 (‘the Schengen Borders Code’) as regards the use of the Entry/Exit System.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Entry conditions for third-country nationals : it is proposed to amend the entry conditions applicable to third-country nations by including an obligation to provide biometric data when such data need to be provided by third-country nationals for the purpose of border checks. Where a third-country national refuses to provide biometric data for the creation of his or her individual file or for the carrying out of border checks, a refusal of entry decision should be adopted.
The Schengen Borders Code sets out the entry conditions for third-country nationals for intended stays on the territory of the Member States of a duration of no more than 90 days in any 180-day period, which entails considering the 180-day period preceding each day of stay.
The amended text states that the period of 90 days in any 180-day period shall be calculated as a single period for the Member States operating the EES. That period shall be calculated separately for each of the Member States that do not operate the EES.
Border checks on persons : with regard to passports and travel containing an electronic storage medium (chip), the authenticity and integrity of the chip data shall be confirmed using the complete valid certificate chain.
The amended text provides for the verification of the identity and the nationality of the third-country national and of the authenticity and validity of the travel document for crossing the border, including by consulting the relevant databases , in particular: (i) the SIS (Schengen Information System); (ii) Interpol’s SLTD (stolen and lost travel documents) database; (iii) national databases containing information on stolen, misappropriated, lost and invalidated travel documents.
Self-service systems and electronic gates : where a person is granted access to a national facilitation programme established by a Member State, the border checks carried out through a self-service system on entry may omit the examination of certain aspects.
Furthermore, Member States must allow for the use of self-service systems, e-gates, or both, for border crossings by: (i) Union citizens, (ii) citizens of a European Free Trade Association State of the European Economic Area (iii) citizens of Switzerland and(iv) third-country nationals whose border crossing is not subject to a registration in the EES.
Standards for automated border control systems : automated border control systems shall, to the extent possible, be designed in such a way that all persons, with the exception of children under 12 years of age, can use them. They shall also be designed in a way that fully respects human dignity , in particular in cases involving vulnerable persons. Where Member States decide to use automated border control systems, they shall ensure the presence of a sufficient number of staff to assist persons with the use of such systems.
National facilitation programmes : first access to the national facilitation programme shall be granted for a maximum of one year . Access may be extended for a maximum of a further five years or until the end of the validity period of the travel document or any issued multiple-entry visas, long-stay visas and residence permits, whichever is shorter.
Border guards may carry out the verification of the third-country national benefiting from the national facilitation programme on entry and on exit without comparing biometrics electronically but by comparing the facial image taken from the electronic storage medium (chip) and the facial image in the third-country national´s individual EES file with that third-country national’s face. Full verification shall be carried out at random and on the basis of a risk analysis.
Transitional measures for the Member States not yet operating the EES : the Member States which do not meet the conditions set out in the regulation on the creation of an entry/exit system (EES) at the date of the start of operations of the EES should continue to systematically stamp, on entry and exit, the travel documents of third-country nationals admitted for a short stay. Those Member States should examine the entry and exit stamps on the travel document of the third-country national concerned in order to verify, by comparing the dates of entry and exit, that the person has not exceeded the maximum duration of authorised stay on the territory of the Member State concerned.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA (EPP, ES) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the use of the Entry/Exit System.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Standards for automated border control systems : Members called for an automated border control system designed in such a way that they can be used by all persons, with the exception of children under 12 years of age. They shall also be designed in a way that fully respects human dignity, in particular in cases involving vulnerable persons. Where Member States decide to use automated border control systems, they shall ensure the presence of a sufficient number of staff to assist persons with the use of such systems.
The Commission in close cooperation with eu-LISA shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the adoption of additional technical standards for automated border control systems .
Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State on the matter.
Lightened formalities : Members set down technical provisions for the implementation of national programmes to alleviate border formalities. Where a person is granted access to a national facilitation programme established by a Member State, the border checks carried out through a self-service system on entry may not include examination of certain aspects when crossing the external borders of that Member State or the external borders of another Member State having concluded an agreement) with that Member State.
In the case of third-country nationals benefiting from a national facilitation programme, border guards may carry out the verifications on entry and on exit without electronically comparing biometrics but by comparing a facial image taken from the chip and the facial image of the third country national´s individual EES file with the third-country national. Full verification shall be carried out at random and on the basis of a risk analysis.
Risk assessment : an adequate level of security shall be established between national facilitation programmes and the EES following a proper information security risk assessment. When establishing such a national facilitation programme, Member States shall, in close cooperation with eu-LISA, ensure data security standards equivalent to those laid down in the Regulation establishing the Entry/Exit System (EES). Member States shall conduct a proper information security risk assessment and security responsibilities shall be made clear for all steps of the process.
Separate lanes : where Member States decide to establish a national facilitation programme, they may decide to use specific lanes for third-country nationals who benefit from such a national facilitation programme.
Annex : it is provided to amend the Annex to the Regulation so as to specify that the person concerned by a control should be informed that her/his personal data and information on this refusal of entry are entered into the Entry/Exit System (EES). The person concerned has the right to obtain the data relating to her/him recorded in the EES and may request that data relating to her/him which are inaccurate be rectified and that data recorded unlawfully be erased.
PURPOSE: to amend Regulation (EU) 2016/399 on the Schengen Borders Code as regards the use of the Entry/Exit System.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: in February 2013, the Commission tabled a package of legislative proposals on Smart Borders to modernise the Schengen area’s external border management. Since then, technical, financial and operational concerns on certain aspects of the design of the systems have been brought to light.
Therefore, the Commission has decided to:
revise its 2013 proposal for a Regulation for the establishment of an Entry/Exit System (EES); revise its 2013 proposal for Regulation amending the Schengen Borders Code to integrate the technical changes that result from the new proposal for a Regulation establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES); withdraw its 2013 proposal for a Regulation for a Registered Traveller Programme (RTP).
CONTENT: this proposal aims to amend Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code).
The proposed amendments are due to the proposed establishment of an Entry Exit System (EES) for which a legislative proposal is presented simultaneously.
The current proposal replaces the 2013 proposal and integrates the following, inter alia , into the Schengen Borders Code:
Definitions : additional definitions of the EES, self-service system, e-gate and Automated Border Control (ABC) system.
Border checks on persons : the obligation to check the authenticity of all travel documents that contain an electronic storage medium using valid certificates has been added.
Provisions have been laid down as regards the use of automated border control systems for EU/EEA/CH citizens and for third country nationals who hold a residence card.
National facilitation programmes : the proposal foresees the possibility for each Member State to introduce national facilitation programmes on a voluntary basis.
Relaxation of border checks : the obligation to always enter the data of the traveller into the EES while entering or exiting the Schengen area is highlighted. Even in situations of relaxation of border check procedures the registration in the EES shall be carried out. Fall-back solutions are proposed in case of technical impossibility to enter data in the Central System of the EES or in case of failure of the Central System of the EES.
Stamping of the travel document : given that the new EES targets the abolition of stamping on entry and exit of the travel documents of third country nationals admitted for a short stay, the obligation to systematically stamp on entry and exit the travel documents of third country nationals admitted for a short stay is deleted . However, where expressly provided under national legislation, the new proposal foresees the possibility, for each Member State to stamp on entry and exit the travel document of those third country nationals holding a residence permit issued by that same Member State.
Refusal of entry : the proposal foresees that data on third country nationals whose entry for a short stay [or for a stay on the basis of a touring visa] has been refused shall be registered in the EES.
Territorial provisions : the proposed Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom and Ireland do not take part. Therefore, they shall not be bound by it or subject to its application.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2017/2225
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 327 09.12.2017, p. 0001
- Final act published in Official Journal: Corrigendum to final act 32017R2225R(01)
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 312 07.12.2018, p. 0107
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)766
- Draft final act: 00046/2017/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0412/2017
- Debate in Council: 3528
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0059/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE597.484
- Committee draft report: PE594.059
- Document attached to the procedure: N8-0141/2016
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 463 13.12.2016, p. 0014
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3098/2016
- Contribution: COM(2016)0196
- Contribution: COM(2016)0196
- Contribution: COM(2016)0196
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2016)0115
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2016)0116
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2016)0196
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0115
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0116
- Document attached to the procedure: N8-0141/2016 OJ C 463 13.12.2016, p. 0014
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3098/2016
- Committee draft report: PE594.059
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE597.484
- Draft final act: 00046/2017/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)766
- Contribution: COM(2016)0196
- Contribution: COM(2016)0196
- Contribution: COM(2016)0196
Activities
Votes
A8-0059/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra - Am 35 25/10/2017 13:11:52.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
90 |
2016/0105(COD)
2017/01/16
LIBE
90 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. This presumption shall not apply to a third
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 12 – paragraph 3 The presumption referred to in paragraph 1 may be rebutted where the person provides, by any means, credible explanation or evidence, such as transport tickets or proof of his or her presence outside the territory of the Member State or of the date of expiry of a previous residence permit or long stay visa, that he or she has respected the conditions relating to the duration of a short stay.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 14 Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 "Without prejudice to any compensation granted in accordance with national law, the third country national concerned shall, where the appeal concludes that the decision to refuse entry was ill-founded, be entitled to correction of the data inserted into the EES or of the cancelled entry stamp, or both, and any other cancellations or additions which have been made, by the
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Annex III, IV and V (15) Annex
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Annexes IV and VIII (16) Annexes IV and VIII
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Annex IV Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Annex V – part A Amendment 18 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to the Protocol (No 1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the role of national parliaments in the European Union,
Amendment 19 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 3 b (new) – having regard to Protocol (No 2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
Amendment 20 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 21 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 22 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) [Regulation (EU) N° XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Entry/Exit System ('EES') to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third country nationals needing a visa to enter the EU crossing the external borders of the Member States of the European Union and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes]
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) [Regulation (EU) N° XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Entry/Exit System ('EES') to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the European Union and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes]9 aims at creating a centralised system for the registration of entry and exit data
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In order to carry out checks on third country nationals pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/399, which include the verification of the identity and/ or the identification of the third country national as well as the verification that the third country national has not exceeded the maximum duration of authorised stay in the territory of the Member States, border guards should use all the information available, including data from the EES. The data stored in that system should also be used to
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) To ensure full effectiveness of the EES, entry and exit checks need to be carried out in a harmonised way at the external borders. To that effect, the duration of the authorised length of stay of 90 days within any 180-day period must include the periods spent on the territory of Member States which apply the provisions of Title III of Regulation 399/2016 and of those which do not.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The establishment of an EES requires adapting the procedures for checking persons when crossing the external borders laid down in Regulation (EU) 2016/399. In particular, the EES aims to abolish on entry and exit the stamping of the travel documents of third country nationals admitted for a stay
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) During a period of six months after the EES has started operations, border guards should take into account the stays in the territories of the Member States during the six months preceding the entry or the exit by checking the stamps in the travel documents in addition to the entry/exit data recorded in the EES. Such measure should enable the required verifications to be carried out in those cases where a person would have been admitted for a short stay on the territory of the Member States in the six months preceding the start of operations of the EES. In addition there is a
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Taking into account the different situations in the Member States and at different border crossing points within the Member States concerning the number of third country nationals crossing the borders, Member States should be able to
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Taking into account the different situations in the Member States and at different border crossing points within the Member States concerning the number of third country nationals crossing the borders, Member States should be able to decide whether and to what extent to make use of technologies such as automated border control systems, "self-service kiosks" and e-gates. When using such technologies and in every other case, it should be ensured that entry and exit checks are carried out in a harmonised way at the external borders and that an appropriate level of security is ensured.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In addition, the tasks and roles of the border guards when making use of such technologies need to be defined. In this regard, it should be ensured that the results of border checks performed through automated means are available to border guards
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In addition, the tasks and roles of the border guards when making use of such technologies need to be defined. In this regard, it should be ensured that the results of border checks performed through automated means are available to border guards so as to enable them to take the appropriate decisions. In addition, there is a need to supervise the use of the automated border control systems, "self- service kiosks" and e-gates by travellers so as to prevent fraudulent behaviour and uses. In addition, when carrying out this supervision, border guards should pay particular attention to minors, and particularly unaccompanied minors, and should be placed in a position that should enable them to identify persons needing protection and ensure that human rights are respected when borders are being crossed.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Member States should also be able to establish national facilitation programmes on a voluntary basis to allow
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Member States should also be able to establish national facilitation programmes
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part (1) In Article 2, the following points 22, 23, 24, 25 and 25a are added:
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 2 – point 22 22.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 2 – point 22 22. 'Entry/Exit System (EES)' means the system established by [Regulation No° XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 2 – point 25 a (new) 25a. 'confirmation of the authenticity and integrity of the chip data' means the process by which it is verified, through the use of certificates, that the data on the chip originates from the issuing authority and that is has not been changed.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part (1a) Article 6(1) is replaced by the following: "(1) For intended stays on the territory of the Member States of a duration of no more than 90 days in any 180-day period on the territory of Member States which apply the provisions of Title III of Regulation (EU) 399/2016 and of Member States which do not apply Title III of Regulation (EU) 399/2016, which entails considering the 180-day period preceding each day of stay, the entry conditions for third-country nationals shall be the following:"
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 1. Data on entry and exit of the following categories of persons shall be entered into the EES in accordance with Articles 14,
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point a (a) third country nationals admitted for a short stay pursuant to Article 6(1)
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a - paragraph 1 - point c a (new) (ca) holders of residence permits;
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a - paragraph 1 - point c b (new) (cb) holders of long-stay visas;
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 2 2. Data on third country nationals whose entry for a short stay
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point -a (new) (-a) minors under the age of 16
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point -a a (new) (-aa) persons applying for international protection;
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 399/2016 Article 6a – paragraph 3 – point (d) – point (v) (v) members of the rescue services, police, fire brigades acting in emergency situation and border guards in accordance with point 7 of Annex VII;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 6a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point i Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a – subpoint -i – subparagraph 3 Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point i Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a – point i – subparagraph 3 Except for third country nationals whose entry is subject to a registration in the EES, if the travel document contains a facial image recorded in the electronic storage medium (chip) and if the facial image recorded in the chip can be legally and technically accessed, this verification shall include, whenever necessary, the verification of the facial image recorded in the chip, by comparing electronically this image with the live facial image of the concerned third country national.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point i Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a – subpoint -ii – subparagraph 2 If the residence permit contains an electronic storage medium (chip) the authenticity of the chip data shall be confirmed using the complete valid certificate chain, unless this is impossible, for technical reasons. The thorough checks on entry shall also comprise a
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point i Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a – subpoint iii Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point i Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a – point iii (iii) for persons whose entry
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point ii Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a – subpoint iiia (new) Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point ii (iii a) for persons whose entry
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point iii Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point iv Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point g – subpoint i "(i) verification that the third country national is in possession of a document valid for crossing the border and that the document is accompanied, where applicable, by the requisite visa or residence permit. Verification of the document shall include the consultation of relevant databases, in particular the Schengen Information System; the Interpol database on stolen and lost travel documents; and national databases containing information on stolen, misappropriated, lost and invalidated travel documents.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point iv Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point g – point i (i) verification that the third country national is in possession of a document valid for crossing the border and that the document is accompanied, where applicable, by the requisite visa or residence permit. Verification of the document shall include the consultation of relevant databases, in particular the Schengen Information System; the Interpol database on stolen and lost travel documents; and national databases containing information on stolen, misappropriated, lost and invalidated travel documents.[23 ] Except for third country nationals whose exit is subject to a registration in the EES, if the travel document contains a facial image recorded in the electronic storage medium (chip) and if the facial image recorded in the chip can be legally and technically accessed, this verification shall include, whenever necessary, the verification of
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point vii Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point i Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point viii Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 9 9. The border guard shall inform the third country national of the maximum number of days of the authorised short stay
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8a Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8a – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8a – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – subpoint ii (ii) the
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8a – paragraph 3 3. Where the conditions under paragraph 2 of this Article are met, the border checks on entry and exit provided for in Article 8(2) and the border crossing itself may be carried out using an automated border control system. When carried out by means of an automated border control system, the border check on entry and exit shall systematically include the verification that the person does not represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat to
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point b (b) when the results of the checks on entry or exit provided for under Article 8(2) question the identity of the person or when they reveal that the person represents a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat to
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8a - paragraph 6 6. Without prejudice to paragraph 4, the border guard supervising the border
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8a - paragraph 7 7. Automated border control systems shall be operated under the supervision of a border guard who shall be in charge of observing the users and detecting, verifying and reporting any inappropriate, fraudulent or abnormal use of the system."
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8b Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8b – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the residence permit presented for the border crossing shall contain a facial image recorded in the chip which can be technically accessed by the automated system so as to verify the identity of the holder of the residence permit
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8b – paragraph 4 – point b (b) when the results of the checks on entry or exit set out in paragraph 2 put into question the identity of the person or when they reveal that the person is considered to be a threat to
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8c Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8c – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the travel document presented for the border crossing shall contain a facial image recorded in the chip which can be legally and technically accessed by the automated system so as to verify the identity of the holder of the travel document
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8 quater – paragraphe 4 – point b – sous-point b Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Règlement (UE) 2016/399 Article 8c – paragraph 5 Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8d – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8d – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where a person is granted access to a national facilitation programme established by a Member State pursuant to Article 8e, the border checks carried out through a self-service system on entry may not include examination of the aspects referred to in Article 8(3)(a) (iv) and (v) when crossing the external borders of that Member State or the external borders of another Member States having concluded an agreement with that Member State as referred to in Article 8e(4).
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8d – paragraph 4 – point c (c) when the results of the checks on entry or exit
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8e – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point iii (iii) the applicant proves by means of documentation the need for or justifies the intention to travel frequently or regularly;
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 (v) the applicant justifies by means of documentation the purpose and conditions of the intended stays;
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point c – point viii viii) the applicant is not considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point d (d) access to the programme shall be granted for a maximum of
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point e (e) the Member State shall reassess every two years the situation of each third country national who is granted access to the programme in order to ensure that, based on updated information, the applicant still meets the conditions laid down in Article 8e(2) (c);
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8e – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 When verifying that the applicant fulfils conditions set out in points (a), (b) and (c), particular consideration shall be given to assessing whether the applicant presents a risk
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8e – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8e – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Border guards may verify third- country nationals benefiting from the programme on entry pursuant to Article 8(3)(a) and (b) and on exit pursuant to Article 8(3)(g) without electronically comparing biometrics but by comparing a facial image taken from the chip and the facial image of the passenger´s individual EES file with the passenger. Full verification shall be carried out at random and on the basis of a risk analysis.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 8e – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. An adequate level of security shall be established between national facilitation programmes and the EES following a proper information security risk assessment. The data shall be subject to the conditions set out in Regulation xxx/xxx [Regulation establishing the Entry/Exit System (EES)].
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 9 – paragraph 3a – point i (i) by way of derogation from Article 6a of this Regulation, the data referred to in Articles 14,
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 9 – paragraph 3 a – point ii Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – introductory part (11) Article 11 is
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 Article 12 source: PE-597.484
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=29278&j=0&l=en
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2016)586614New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2016)586614 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3098)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3098)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE594.059New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-594059_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE597.484New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-597484_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=29278&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20171025&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-10-25-TOC_EN.html |
events/10 |
|
procedure/Notes |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0059&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0059_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0412New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0412_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/8/06159New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R2225New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R2225 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/6/docs/0 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/9 |
|
activities/10 |
|
links/Research document |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final actNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
7.10.02 Schengen areaNew
7.10.02 Schengen area, Schengen acquis |
activities/6/docs/1/text |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final act |
activities/6/docs/1/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0412
|
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
activities/6/date |
Old
2017-10-24T00:00:00New
2017-10-25T00:00:00 |
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
LIBE/8/06159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
other/0 |
|
committees/0/date |
2016-04-20T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|