Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR) | KARIŅŠ Krišjānis ( PPE), KREHL Constanze ( S&D), KALLAS Kaja ( ALDE), REIMON Michel ( Verts/ALE), PAKSAS Rolandas ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | COSTA Silvia ( S&D) | Curzio MALTESE ( GUE/NGL), Michel REIMON ( Verts/ALE), Bogdan Brunon WENTA ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ŠTEFANEC Ivan ( PPE) | Emma McCLARKIN ( ECR), Jiří MAŠTÁLKA ( GUE/NGL), Felix REDA ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | CONT | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | PETERSEN Morten ( ALDE) | Jan Philipp ALBRECHT ( Verts/ALE), József NAGY ( PPE), Branislav ŠKRIPEK ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to establish the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the BEREC Support Agency (BEREC Office) as part of the telecommunications reform to promote better and faster connectivity in Europe.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Agency for Support for BEREC (BEREC Office), amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009.
CONTENT: the Regulation establishes the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the BEREC Support Agency (BEREC Office) and defines the appropriate tasks and organisational structure for each of them:
- BEREC shall be composed of the Board of Regulators composed of one member from each Member State and the working groups set up by the Board of Regulators, which will be open to the participation of experts from the Commission;
- the BEREC Office shall be a body of the Union, with legal personality. It shall be represented by its Director, assume sole responsibility for the tasks assigned to it and the powers conferred on it. Its headquarters shall be in Riga, Latvia.
Tasks of BEREC and the BEREC Office
In accordance with its new mandate, BEREC shall play an important role in helping EU countries to deploy very high capacity networks and would contribute to the smooth application of the regulatory measures provided for in the European Electronic Communications Code , which defines a significant number of new tasks for BEREC, such as the publication of guidelines on various topics, the preparation of reports on technical issues, the maintenance of registers, lists or databases, and the preparation of opinions on internal market procedures for draft national measures relating to market regulation.
BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially, transparently and in a timely manner, and shall draw on the expertise available within national regulatory authorities (NRAs). It shall also serve as a body for reflection, debate and advice for the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in the field of electronic communications.
The BEREC Office shall provide all necessary professional and administrative support for the work of BEREC, including financial, organisational and logistical support, and contribute to the regulatory work of BEREC. It shall need to be adequately staffed to carry out its tasks.
Maximum price limit for international calls within the EU
The BEREC Regulation also contains provisions for cheaper intra-EU calls. The new rules cap the price of calls between EU countries at a maximum of 19 euro cents for fixed and mobile calls (intra-EU calls). They also limit SMS messages to a maximum of 6 cents.
The beneficiaries shall be consumers, as companies usually negotiate their tariffs with operators. As with roaming, derogations are possible in exceptional circumstances. The new ceilings shall apply from 15 May 2019.
Member States shall have to determine the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of these provisions and take all necessary measures to ensure their implementation.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 20.12.2018.
The European Parliament adopted by 590 votes to 63, with 23 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Maintaining the dual structure : the proposed Regulation aims to establish the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Agency for Support for BEREC (the BEREC Office) and to define the appropriate tasks and organisational structure for each of them.
The BEREC Office shall be a body of the Union. It shall have legal personality. BEREC shall be composed of a Board of Regulators made up of one member from each Member State and working groups open to the participation of experts from all the NRAs participating in the work of BEREC and the Commission.
It shall be represented by its Director. It shall have sole responsibility for the tasks assigned to and the powers conferred on it.
The BEREC Office shall have its seat in Riga, Latvia.
Tasks of BEREC and the BEREC Office : in accordance with its new mandate, BEREC shall play an important role in helping EU countries to deploy very high-capacity networks and contribute to the smooth operation of the regulatory measures provided for in the European Electronic Communications Code , which defines a significant number of new tasks for BEREC, such as the publication of guidelines, reporting on technical matters, keeping registers, lists or databases and delivering opinions on internal market procedures for draft national measures on market regulation.
BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially, transparently and in a timely manner , and shall rely on the expertise available within national regulatory authorities (NRAs). It shall also serve as a body for reflection, debate and advice for the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in the field of electronic communications. It shall, inter alia :
provide expertise and establish confidence by virtue of its independence, the quality of its advice and information, the transparency of its procedures and methods of operation, and its diligence in carrying out its tasks; contribute to the Commission's public consultation and provide the Commission, when requested, with advice on the preparation of legislative proposals; be able to provide advice to the European Parliament and the Council , at their request or on its own initiative. ensure that all NRAs are involved in the performance of its regulatory tasks and its functioning. Each Member State shall ensure that its NRA has sufficient financial and human resources to participate fully in the work of BEREC; be empowered to establish working arrangements with EU bodies, offices, agencies and advisory groups, with competent authorities of third countries and international organisations, for example to establish cooperative relations and to exchange views on regulatory issues.
The BEREC Office shall provide all necessary professional and administrative support for the work of BEREC, including financial, organisational and logistical support, and contribute to BEREC's regulatory work. It shall be adequately staffed to carry out its tasks.
In accordance with the principle of transparency , BEREC and the BEREC Office shall:
publish information about their work on their website; make publicly available updated lists of their tasks and updated lists of members, alternates and other participants in meetings of their organisational bodies, as well as declarations of interest made by members of the Board of Regulators, members of the Management Board and the Director.
Retail charges for regulated intra-EU communications : from 15 May 2019, any retail price (excluding VAT) charged to consumers for regulated intra-EU communications shall not exceed EUR 0.19 per minute for calls and EUR 0.06 per SMS message .
Suppliers may offer their consumers other tariff offers for international calls, with different tariffs for calls within the regulated European Union. Consumers would be free to expressly choose these offers, and to change them at any time and free of charge.
Before consumers choose such a different tariff, the provider of regulated intra-EU communications shall inform them of the nature of the advantages which would thereby be lost.
Where a provider of regulated intra-EU communications establishes that, due to specific and exceptional circumstances distinguishing it from most other Union providers, the application of the cap referred to in the Regulation would have significant impact on that provider’s capacity to sustain its existing prices for domestic communications, a national regulatory authority may, upon that provider’s request, grant a derogation only to the extent necessary and for a renewable period of one year.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report by Evžen TOŠENOVSKÝ (ECR, CZ) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Maintaining the institutional balance : while the European Commission proposes to convert BEREC and its Office into a single EU agency of the Union, Members re-introduced into the proposed regulation the dual structure of BEREC and BEREC Office and has set out the appropriate tasks and organisational set-up for each.
The Agency for Support for European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC Office) shall be a body of the Union . It shall have legal personality . It shall have sole responsibility for the tasks assigned to and the powers conferred on it.
The BEREC Office shall be independent as regards operational and technical matters and should enjoy legal, administrative and financial autonomy. It shall be represented by the chairman of the Board of Regulators. The BEREC Office shall be based in Riga, Latvia.
Tasks and organisation of BEREC : BEREC shall consist of: (i) a Board of Regulators; (ii) Expert Working Groups; (iii) a Board of Appeal. As its primary objective, BEREC shall ensure a consistent regulatory approach to the implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications and shall thereby contribute to the development of the internal market.
BEREC shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives of national regulatory and other competent authorities (NRAs) and shall group together the full list of tasks entrusted to BEREC under various pieces of legislation, including notably those assigned to it under the new European Electronic Communications Code.
It shall also promote: (i) the principle of net neutrality and the open internet; (ii) access to, investment in, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity; (iii) competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities; (iv) the interests of the citizens of the Union.
To make BEREC more powerful and more representative and to safeguard expertise, experience and knowledge of the specific situation of the full range of national markets, the report suggested that each Member State should ensure that its NRA has adequate financial and human resources required to participate in the work of BEREC, in particular in the work of the Working Groups and chairmanship of the Board of Regulators.
In view of the additional tasks assigned to BEREC , Members proposed that the Chair should have a stable two-year term of office . Lists of qualified expert members of working groups, together with their declaration of interests, should be made publicly available.
The European Parliament may invite, while fully respecting his or her independence, the Chair or a Vice-Chair of the Board of Regulators to make a statement before its competent committee on relevant issues relating to BEREC’s activities and answer questions put by the members of the European Parliament.
Tasks and organisation of the BEREC Office : the BEREC Office shall provide all necessary professional and administrative support, including financial, organisational and logistical support, for the work of BEREC. Members stressed that it should be adequately staffed to carry out its duties .
An enlarged list of tasks assigned to BEREC and increased weight of content-related tasks vis-à-vis purely administrative ones should be duly reflected in resource programming of the BEREC Office according to Members.
In order to guarantee the BEREC Office’s autonomy and independence , and in order to provide support to the work of BEREC, the BEREC Office shall have its own budget, most of which comes essentially from a contribution from the Union. The budget should reflect the additional tasks assigned and the enhanced role of the BEREC Office and BEREC.
Transparency and communication : BEREC and the BEREC Office shall ensure that the public and any interested parties are given appropriate, objective, reliable and easily accessible information, in particular in relation to their tasks and the results of their work.
No later than five years from the day of entry into force of this regulation, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall perform an evaluation to assess the performance of BEREC and the BEREC Office.
PURPOSE: to strengthen the role of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) in the area of electronic communications.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure on an equal footing with Council.
BACKGROUND: Regulation (EC) 1211/2009 established the setting up of BEREC and the BEREC Office. Their aim was to contribute to the development and better functioning of the internal market for electronic communications networks and services.
BEREC and the BEREC Office have made a positive contribution towards a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications. Notwithstanding, there are still significant disparities between Member States as regards regulatory practice. Moreover, the governance structure of BEREC and the
BEREC Office is cumbersome and gives rise to unnecessary administrative burden.
In order to ensure efficiency gains and synergies and to further contribute to the development of the internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union as well as to the promotion of very high capacity data connectivity, the Commission proposes to strengthen the role of BEREC and enhance its governance structure by establishing BEREC as a Union decentralised agency. BEREC would therefore become a key actor to serve the objective of achieving an internal telecoms market in the Union.
In its Communication of 6 May 2015 entitled ‘ A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe’ , the Commission envisaged presenting proposals in 2016 for an ambitious overhaul of the regulatory framework for electronic communications . The communication pointed out that the changing market and technological environment make it necessary to strengthen the institutional framework by enhancing the role of BEREC.
In its resolution ‘ Towards a Digital Single Market Act’ , the European Parliament called on the Commission to integrate further the digital single market by ensuring a more efficient institutional framework by strengthening the role, capacity and decision-making powers of BEREC. Parliaments also stressed the need to improve the financial and human resources and further enhance the governance structure of BEREC.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option is to strengthen BEREC’s advisory role with certain pre-normative powers and better market review process and spectrum assignment of right of use for radio spectrum.
CONTENT: the proposal repealing Regulation (EC) 1211/2009 broadens the current mandate of BEREC and turns it into a fully-fledged agency equipped with the necessary tools and adequate resources to achieve its objectives and carry out its tasks. The proposal should be read together with the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Electronic Communications Code.
Aims: BEREC should aim to achieve the same objectives as NRAs. In particular, it should:
ensure a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications and thereby contribute to the development of the internal market; promote (i) access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity ; (ii) competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities; and (iii) the interests of the citizens of the Union.
Tasks: the proposal sets out additional tasks for BEREC, notably:
powers to adopt binding decisions on the identification of transnational markets and on a contract summary template; quasi-binding powers in relation to the internal market procedures for draft national measures on market regulation (the ‘double-lock’ system) and the establishment of a single maximum termination rate for the Union; quasi-binding powers in relation to the internal market procedures for draft national measures on market regulation (the ‘double-lock’ system) and the establishment of a single maximum termination rate for the Union. the issuing of guidelines in a number of areas: (i) geographical surveys, (ii) common approaches to meeting transnational demand, (iii) minimum criteria for reference offers, (iv) common criteria for the management of numbering resources, (v) quality-of-service parameters, (vi) applicable measurement methods and the technical details of the cost model to be applied by NRAs when setting maximum symmetric termination rates. It will also be given the power to request information directly from operators;
In addition, BEREC:
will be in charge of setting up a register for the extraterritorial use of numbers and cross-border arrangements and another register of providers of electronic communications networks and services; assist the Commission and NRAs in the area of standardisation by helping them identify a threat to end-to-end connectivity or to effective access to emergency services.
In a ‘double-lock’ system, if BEREC and the Commission agree on their position regarding the draft remedies an NRA proposes, the Commission could require the NRA to amend or withdraw the draft measure and, if necessary, to re-notify the market analysis.
A ‘peer review’ system within BEREC will also be introduced as a new coordination mechanism to improve efficiency and coherence amongst Member States with regard to regulatory market aspects of assignments of rights of use for radio spectrum.
Administrative and management structure : this comprises a Management Board, an Executive Director, Working Groups and a Board of Appeal. The Executive Director manages the agency and will be its legal representative. The Executive Director is accountable to the Management Board and shall report to the European Parliament
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the total financial resources necessary for BEREC to fulfil its mission amount to EUR 14 135 million for the period 2019-2020 . In addition to the contribution from the Union, BEREC may collect charges for publications and other services provided, contributions from third countries or the electronic communications regulatory authorities of third countries participating in the work of BEREC and voluntary contributions from the Member States and NRAs.
Documents
- Follow-up document: SWD(2023)0144
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)838
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2018/1971
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 321 17.12.2018, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00051/2018/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0454/2018
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2018)005652
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2018)005652
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0305/2017
- Committee opinion: PE601.038
- Committee opinion: PE599.723
- Committee opinion: PE599.567
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE602.937
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Committee draft report: PE600.889
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5211/2016
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Debate in Council: 3505
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2016)0303
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2016)0304
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2016)0591
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0303
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0304
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5211/2016
- Committee draft report: PE600.889
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE602.937
- Committee opinion: PE599.567
- Committee opinion: PE599.723
- Committee opinion: PE601.038
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2018)005652
- Draft final act: 00051/2018/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)838
- Follow-up document: SWD(2023)0144
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
- Contribution: COM(2016)0591
Activities
- Paul RÜBIG
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michał BONI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krišjānis KARIŅŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lambert van NISTELROOIJ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Felix REDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sotirios ZARIANOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0305/2017 - Evžen Tošenovský - Am 2 14/11/2018 13:16:43.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
512 |
2016/0286(COD)
2017/03/29
IMCO
91 amendments...
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) BEREC and the Office (
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) BEREC and the BEREC Office have made a positive contribution towards a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The need for the regulatory framework for electronic communications to be consistently applied in a balanced and non-discriminatory manner in all Member States is essential for the successful development of an internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union and the promotion of access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, of competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and of the interests of the citizens of the Union. In view of market and technological developments, which often entails an increased cross-border dimension, and to the experience so far in ensuring a consistent implementation in the electronic communications field, it is necessary to build on the work of BEREC and the BEREC Office and further develop them into a fully-fledged agency.
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) In order to ensure the consistent application of legislation throughout the Union, a consistency mechanism for cooperation between the national regulatory authorities should be established through BEREC. That mechanism should in particular apply where a national regulatory authority intends to adopt a measure intended to produce legal effects which may create a barrier to the internal market or create a lack of legal certainty on the common interpretation of Union legislation. It should apply where any national regulatory authority concerned requests that such matter should be handled in the consistency mechanism, in cases of crossborder disputes or on the basis of a complaint by an undertaking operating crossborder and impacted by such measures. That mechanism should be without prejudice to any measures that the Commission may take in the exercise of its powers under the Treaties.
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Compared to the situation in the past where both a Board of Regulators and a Management Committee were running in parallel, having a single board giving general orientations for the activities of BEREC, deciding on regulatory and operational as well as on administrative and budgetary management matters should help improving the efficiency, coherence and performance of the agency. To this end, the Management Board should carry the relevant functions and should consist
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Compared to the situation in the past where both a Board of Regulators and a Management Committee were running in parallel, having a single board giving general orientations for the activities of BEREC, deciding on regulatory and operational as well as on administrative and budgetary management matters should help improving the efficiency, coherence and performance of the agency. To this end, the Management Board should carry the relevant functions and should consist, in addition of
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of the new agency and the implementation of the tasks assigned to it. The Management Board should appoint him/her on the basis of a list drawn up by the C
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Experience has shown that most of BEREC’s tasks are better carried out through working groups, therefore the Management Board should be in charge of setting up working groups and appointing their members. In order to ensure a balanced approach, the working groups should be coordinated and moderated by members of the BEREC staff. Lists of qualified experts should be prepared in advance to ensure a quick set-up of certain working groups, in particular those related to internal market procedures for draft national measures on market regulation and on assignments of rights of use for radio spectrum, due to the time limits of those procedures. Lists of qualified expert members of working groups, together with their declaration of interests, should be made publicly available.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) BEREC should be independent as regards operational and technical matters and should enjoy legal, administrative and financial autonomy.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to further extend the consistent implementation of the provisions of the regulatory framework for electronic communications within the scope of BEREC, it
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) BEREC should be allowed to engage in communication activities within its field of competence, which should not be detrimental to BEREC’s core tasks and should be carried out in accordance with relevant communication and dissemination plans adopted by the Management Board. The content and implementation of BEREC’s communication strategy should be coherent
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) In order to carry out its tasks effectively, BEREC should have the right to request all necessary information from the Commission, the NRAs and,
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 BEREC shall act within the scope of Directive [...], Directive 2002/58/EC, Regulation (EC) No 531/2012, Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120 and Decision 243/2012/EU36 (Radio Spectrum Policy Programme) and any other Union act setting new tasks and powers. _________________ 36 Decision No 243/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (OJ L 81, 21.3.2012, p. 7).
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall pursue the same objectives as those of national regulatory authorities (‘NRAs’) referred to in Article 3 of the Directive. In particular, BEREC shall ensure a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications within the scope referred to in paragraph 2 and thereby contribute to the development of the harmonised internal market. It shall also promote non- discriminatory treatment of traffic in the provision of internet access services; open internet access; access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity; competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities; and the interests of the citizens of the Union.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall pursue the same objectives as those of national regulatory authorities (‘NRAs’) referred to in Article 3 of the Directive. In particular, BEREC shall ensure a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications within the scope referred to in paragraph 2 and thereby contribute to the development of the internal market and help encourage innovation. It shall also promote access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity; competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities; and the interests of the citizens of the Union.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially and transparently and shall draw upon the expertise available in the NRAs. Each Member State shall ensure that the NRAs have the adequate financial and human resources required to participate in the work of BEREC.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially and transparently.
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. BEREC shall draw upon expertise available in the NRAs. Each Member State should ensure that its NRAs have adequate financial and human resources to participate in the work of BEREC.
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assist, advise
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assist, advise and cooperate with the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council as well as NRAs, on request or on its own initiative, on any technical matter within its mandate
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assist, advise and cooperate with the Commission as well as NRAs, on request or on its own initiative, on any technical matter within its mandate, and
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) advise the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, on request or on its own initiative, on the outcome of its analysis of the regulatory impact of any matter regarding the dynamics of the internal market in its areas of competence;
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) promote cooperation among the NRAs, and between the NRAs and the Commission;
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new) (a b) issue recommendations and disseminate regulatory best practices addressed to the NRAs in order to encourage consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications;
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 a (new) - on regulatory issues that may create a barrier to the internal market or subject to divergences in the implementation of the legislative framework referred to in Article 1(2), by the national regulatory authorities or by other competent authorities, only : a) in cases of crossborder disputes where competent national regulatory authorities have not been able to reach an agreement within a period of 3 months, after the case in question was referred to the last of those regulatory authorities b) upon a request from a competent national regulatory authority c) upon a complaint lodged by an undertaking providing electronic communications networks or services a decision shall be adopted in the shortest possible time frame and in any case within four months, except in exceptional circumstances, from the referral of the subject matter by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Board. The decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be reasoned and addressed to national regulatory authorities concerned and binding on them. The Chair of the Board shall notify, without undue delay, the decision referred to in paragraph 1 to the national regulatory authorities. It shall inform the Commission thereof. The decision shall be published on the website of BEREC without delay.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 1 a (new) - on the consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications;
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 7 a (new) - on non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in the provision of internet access services according to Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120;
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) monitor and coordinate the action of NRAs in applying Regulation (EU) No 531/2012, in particular as regards the provision of regulated retail roaming services at domestic prices in the interests of end-users, the evolution of retail and wholesale charges for roaming services and on transparency and comparability of tariffs in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 ;
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (a a) monitor market developments, evaluate the needs for regulatory innovation and coordinate actions between national regulatory authorities to enable the development of new innovative electronic communication services (and ensure convergence, in particular in the area of standardisation, numbering, and spectrum allocation;
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 a (new) - on market practices that might lead to a detrimental effect on the non- discriminatory internet access, open internet, consumer rights and on abusive practices;
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 3 - on the evolution of retail and wholesale charges for roaming services and on transparency and comparability of tariffs in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012, and where necessary, make recommendations to the Commission;
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) provide a framework within which national regulatory authorities can cooperate, and promote cooperation between the national regulatory authorities in those areas which are still not harmonised at Union level. BEREC shall take due into account of the outcome of such cooperation when formulating its opinions, recommendations and decisions. Where BEREC considers that binding rules on such cooperation are required, it shall make the appropriate recommendations to the Commission;
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d – introductory part (d) keep a regularly updated register of:
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) launch a data innovation initiative to modernise, coordinate and standardise the collection of data by national regulatory authorities. Without prejudice to the intellectual property rights and the required confidentiality level, this data shall be made available to the public in an open, reusable and machine-readable format on the BEREC website and the European data portal;
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (d b) cooperate with the Consumer Protection Cooperation and relevant national competent authorities, as regards matters related to the provision of electronic communication services which may affect consumers' interests in several Member states;
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially, transparently and in a timely manner. BEREC shall ensure that the public and any interested parties are given appropriate, objective, reliable and easily accessible information, in particular with regard to the results of its work.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Where appropriate, before adopting decisions, reports or other type of public deliverables, BEREC shall consult interested parties and give them the opportunity to comment within a reasonable period having regard to the complexity of the matter and in any event not shorter than 30 days, except in exceptional circumstances. Without prejudice to Article 28, the results of the consultation procedure shall be made publicly available by BEREC.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 c (new) 3 c. BEREC shall promote cooperation between NRAs, and between NRAs and the Commission.
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. In so far as is necessary in order to achieve the objectives set out in this regulation and perform its tasks, BEREC may, where appropriate, consult the relevant NRAs and cooperate with competent Union bodies, agencies, offices and advisory groups, with competent authorities of third countries and/or with international organisations
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. In so far as is necessary in order to achieve the objectives set out in this regulation and perform its tasks, BEREC may cooperate with competent Union bodies, agencies, offices and advisory groups, with competent authorities of Member States, third countries and/or with national or international organisations, in accordance to Article 26.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. BEREC may organise public consultation with all interested parties and give them the opportunity to comment within a reasonable period. BEREC shall make the results of such consultations publicly available.
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Any third-country regulatory authorities that are invited by the Board of Regulators shall have observer status and shall be represented at an appropriately high level.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. The Board of Regulators may invite any person whose opinion may be of interest to attend its meetings on a case-by-case basis as an observer.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The list of Members of the Management board, together with their declaration of interest, shall be made publicly available.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) adopt and proceed with an assessment of the consolidated annual activity report on BEREC’s activities and send both the report and its assessment, by 1 July each year to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors. The annual report on BEREC's activities shall be presented to the Parliament and Council by the Executive Director during a public session. The consolidated annual activity report shall be made public;
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Without prejudice to the powers of the Management Board, the Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson shall be independent in the performance of their duties and shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government or NRA, institution, person or body.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Every second year the Board of Regulators appoints the Chairperson for the year subsequent to the following year and the Deputy Chairperson for the following year.
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. The Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson shall report to the European Parliament on the performance of their duties and the performance of BEREC when invited to do so. The Council may invite the Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson to report on the performance of their duties and the performance of BEREC.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Where appropriate to safeguard the independence of BEREC or to avoid the conflict of interest, the Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson may indicate point(s) on the agenda where the observers shall not participate in the plenary meeting.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 a (new) Article 8 a Independence 1. The Board shall act independently when performing its tasks or exercising its powers pursuant to this Regulation. 2. Without prejudice to requests by the Commission or national regulatory authorities referred to in this Regulation, the Board shall, in the performance of its tasks or the exercise of its powers, neither seek nor take instructions from any other body.
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to the powers of the Commission and the Management Board, the Executive Director shall be independent in the performance of his/her duties and shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government, NRA, institution, person or body.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. The Executive Director shall be responsible for the implementation of BEREC’s tasks following the guidance provided by the Management Board. In particular, the Executive Director shall be responsible for:
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. The Management Board shall appoint the Chairperson, the other members and their alternates from a list of qualified candidates established by the
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 5. On the proposal of BEREC, the
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Once the matter has been resolved, the final decision can be sent for information to all NRAs concerned.
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board, from a list of qualified candidates proposed by the C
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board, from a list of candidates proposed by the Commission or the Member States, following an open and transparent selection procedure.
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Before appointment, the candidate selected by the Management Board
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3. The term of office of the Executive Director shall be
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The term of office of the Executive Director may not be extended.
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 6 Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 6 Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 7 Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 7 7. The Executive Director may be removed from office only upon a decision of the Management Board acting on a proposal from
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 8 Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 8 8. The Management Board shall reach decisions on appointment
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall be legally represented by the Executive Director.
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. BEREC shall establish and manage an information and communication system with at least the following one-stop-shop functions: (a) a single entry point through which a undertaking subject to general authorisation shall submit its application; (b) a common information-exchange platform, providing BEREC, the Commission and national regulatory authorities with the necessary information for the common implementation of Union legislation; (c) an early-warning system able to identify at an early stage the needs for coordination between decisions to be taken by national regulatory authorities; 6. The Management Board shall adopt the technical and functional specifications and a plan to establish this system. It shall be developed without prejudice to the intellectual property rights and the required confidentiality level. 7. This information and communication systems shall be operational at the latest one year after the entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 source: 602.731
2017/04/03
CULT
130 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 c (new) Amendment 101 #
2c. Contact Network 1. The Contact Network shall be composed of one senior NRA representative for each Member State and representatives of all observers to the Board of Regulators. 2. The Contact Network shall assist the Board of Regulators in the fulfilment of its tasks, particularly by making the necessary preparations for the meetings of the Board of Regulators, such as processing of the documents developed by the Working Groups. 3. The Board of Regulators shall adopt rules of procedure laying down the practical arrangements for the operation of the Contact Network.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Functioning of the Working Groups 1. Where justified and in particular to implement BEREC's annual work programme, the Board of Regulators may set up the necessary Working Groups. 2. The members of the expert Working Groups shall be designated by the NRAs, the BEREC Office and third- country regulatory authorities that participate as observers in the work of Board of Regulators. The Board of Regulators may also invite, at the Commission's request individual experts recognised as competent in the relevant field to participate in the Working Groups if necessary on a case-by-case basis. 3. Where appropriate to safeguard the independence of BEREC or to avoid a conflict of interest, the Co-Chairs may decide that certain items are to be discussed in the absence of the experts of the Commission, third-country regulatory authorities and other invited bodies. 4. The Board of Regulators shall appoint two Co-Chairs from different NRAs to each Working Group unless exceptional and temporary circumstances warrant otherwise. 5. The Board of Regulators shall adopt rules of procedure laying down the practical arrangements for the operation of the Working Groups.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 e (new) Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 g (new) Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. In so far as is necessary in order to achieve the objectives set out in this regulation and perform its tasks, BEREC may, where appropriate, consult the relevant NRAs and cooperate with competent Union bodies, agencies, offices and advisory groups, with competent authorities of third countries and/or with international organisations
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. In so far as is necessary in order to achieve the objectives set out in this regulation and perform its tasks, BEREC may cooperate with competent Union bodies, agencies, offices and advisory groups, with competent authorities of Member States, third countries and/or with national and international organisations, in accordance to Article 26.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. In so far as is necessary in order to achieve the objectives set out in this regulation and perform its tasks, BEREC may, where appropriate, consult the relevant NRAs and cooperate with competent Union bodies, agencies, offices and advisory groups, with competent authorities of third countries and/or with international organisations
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. BEREC shall, where necessary, seek the views of, and involve, relevant stakeholders in its work, for example via consultations or stakeholder forums. In so doing, it shall ensure that stakeholders represent fully the different policy interests at stake.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. BEREC may, where appropriate, consult interested parties and give them the opportunity to comment within a reasonable period. BEREC shall, without prejudice to Article 28, make the results of such consultations publicly available.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. BEREC may organise public consultations with all interested parties and give them the opportunity to comment within a reasonable period. BEREC shall make the results of such consultations publicly available.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The administrative and management structure of the BEREC Office shall comprise:
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – an Executive Director, which shall exercise the responsibilities set out in Article 9; his/her appointment must be the result of an independent, joint selection process carried out by the Commission and the Member States, with the Member States being given priority;
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – a
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 3 Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 4 Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Third-country regulatory authorities invited by the Management Board shall have observer status and shall be represented at an appropriately high level.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Members of the Management Board and their alternates shall be appointed in light of their knowledge in the field of electronic communications, taking into account relevant managerial, administrative and budgetary skills and their independence, particularly from the Commission, companies and large foreign groups. All parties represented in the Management Board shall make efforts to limit turnover of their representatives, in order to ensure continuity of the board’s work. All parties shall aim to achieve a balanced representation between men and women on the Management Board.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) adopt rules for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest as referred to in Article 31
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point o Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The term of office of the Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson shall be
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson shall report to the European Parliament on the performance of their duties and the performance of BEREC when invited to do so.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to the powers of the Commission and the Management Board, the Executive Director shall be independent in the performance of his/her duties and shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government, institution, person or body, nor any company or foreign, non-European group, specifically companies and groups that do not have their headquarters, policy centres, R&D centres or production sites on European soil.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 a (new) Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 2 – section 3 Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 2 – section 3 Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board, from a list of candidates proposed by the Commission, all under the close supervision of the competent digital authorities of the Member States, following an open and transparent selection procedure.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Before appointment, the candidate selected by the Management Board
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Before appointment, the candidate selected by the Management Board
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3. The term of office of the Executive Director shall be five years. By the end of that period, the Commission and the competent digital authorities of the Member States shall undertake an assessment that takes into account an evaluation of the Executive Director’s performance and BEREC’s future tasks and challenges.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3. The term of office of the Executive Director shall be
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 4. The Management Board, acting on a proposal from the Commission that takes into account the assessment referred to in paragraph 3, may extend the term of office of the Executive Director
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 5. The Management Board shall inform the European Parliament if it intends to extend the Executive Director’s term of office. Within one month before any such extension, the Executive Director
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 7 7. The Executive Director may be removed from office only upon a decision of the Management Board acting on a proposal from the Commission
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. BEREC shall
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. The BEREC
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. In each of the Member States the BEREC Office shall enjoy the most extensive legal capacity accorded to legal persons under their laws. It may, in particular, acquire and dispose of movable and immovable property and be party to legal proceedings.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. The BEREC Office shall be represented by the
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 BEREC shall adopt its own security rules equivalent to the Commission’s security rules for protecting European Union Classified Information (‘EUCI’) and sensitive non-classified information, inter alia provisions for the exchange, processing and storage of such information
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) The independence of office members from companies or foreign, non- European groups, specifically companies and groups that do not have their headquarters, policy centres, R&D centres or production sites on European soil, must be certified.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 1. No later than five years from the day of entry into force of this regulation, and every five years thereafter, the Commission and the competent digital authorities of the Member States shall perform an evaluation in compliance with the Commission guidelines and those of the aforementioned authorities to assess BEREC’s performance in relation to its objectives, mandate, tasks and location(s). The evaluation shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify the mandate of BEREC, and the financial implications of any such modification.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 1. No later than five years from the day of entry into force of this regulation, and every
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 2 2. Where the Commission and the competent digital authorities consider
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation – The Committee on Culture and Education calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) In its Communication of 6 May 201527 entitled ‘A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe’, the Commission envisaged presenting proposals in 2016 for an ambitious overhaul of the regulatory framework for electronic communications focusing inter alia on a more effective regulatory institutional framework in order to make the telecoms rules fit for purpose as part of the creation of the right conditions for the digital single market. These include the deployment of very high capacity connectivity networks, more coordinated management of radio spectrum for wireless networks and creating a level playing field for advanced digital networks and innovative services. The Communication pointed out that the changing market and technological environment make it necessary to strengthen the institutional framework by enhancing the role of BEREC.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In its Resolution of 19 January 2016 ‘Towards a Digital Single Market Act’, the European Parliament called on the Commission to integrate further the digital single market by ensuring that a more efficient institutional framework is in place. It can do this by strengthening the role, capacity and decision-making powers of BEREC in order to allow it to foster the consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications, to enable an efficient oversight of BEREC over the development of the single market and to help it to resolve cross-border disputes. The European Parliament also stresses, in this regard, the need to improve the financial and human resources and further enhance the governance structure of BEREC.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) BEREC and the BEREC Office have made a positive contribution towards a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications. Notwithstanding, there are still significant disparities between Member States as regards regulatory practice.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) BEREC and the BEREC Office have made a positive contribution towards a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications. Notwithstanding, there are still significant disparities between Member States as regards regulatory practice.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) The implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications, together with the advances in communication technology and in software, have led to leaps forward in the way that culture and cultural content are distributed and accessed by European citizens. However, the uneven coverage of infrastructure and lock-in effects have also brought deep digital divides. To bridge those divides and prevent the emergence of new ones, in particular in relation to cultural diversity and multilingualism, BEREC, by using appropriate tools for the scale of the issues, is one of the institutions that need to factor in the broader cultural and social impact when issuing guidelines, opinions and other types of texts.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The need for the regulatory framework for electronic communications to be consistently applied in all Member States is essential for the successful development of an internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union and the promotion of access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, of competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and of the interests of the citizens of the Union. In view of market and technological developments, which often entails an increased cross-border dimension, and to the experience so far in ensuring a consistent implementation in the electronic communications field, it is necessary to build on the work of BEREC and the BEREC Office and
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The need for the regulatory framework for electronic communications to be consistently applied in all Member States is essential for the successful development of an internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union and the promotion of access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, of competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and of the interests of the citizens of the Union. In view of market and technological developments, which often entails an increased cross-border dimension, and to the experience so far in ensuring a consistent implementation in the electronic communications field, it is necessary to build on the work of
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The tasks of BEREC, as a technical body with expertise on electronic communications and composed of representatives from NRAs and the Commission,
Amendment 31 #
(11) BEREC should be allowed if necessary to cooperate with, and without prejudice to the role of, other Union bodies, agencies, offices and advisory groups, in particular the Radio Spectrum Policy Group29, the European Data Protection Board30, the European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services31 and the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security32; as well as with existing committees (such as the Communications Committee and the Radio Spectrum Committee). It should also be allowed to cooperate with competent authorities of third countries, in particular, regulatory authorities competent in the field of electronic communications and/or groups of those authorities, as well as with international organisations when necessary for the performance of its tasks. BERECE also needs to be at the full service of the Member States, and must abide by their respective laws. _________________ 29 Decision 2002/622/EC establishing a Radio Spectrum Policy Group (OJ L 198, 27.7.2002, p. 49). 30 Established under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p.1). 31 Directive [...]. Directive [...]. 32 Regulation (EU) No 526/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 concerning the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) and
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) The organisational structures of BEREC and of the BEREC Office should be streamlined and suitable for the tasks they are to perform. Taking into account settled procedures and new set of tasks assigned to BEREC, it is necessary to make minor changes in the organisation with a view to strengthening the effectiveness of both BEREC and the BEREC Office.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Compared to the situation in the past where both a Board of Regulators and a Management Committee were running in parallel, having a single board giving general orientations for the activities of BEREC, deciding on regulatory and operational as well as on administrative and budgetary management matters should help improving the efficiency, coherence and performance of the agency. To this end, the Management Board should carry the relevant functions and should consist, in addition to
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Compared to the situation in the past where both a Board of Regulators and a Management Committee were running in parallel, having a single board giving general orientations for the activities of BEREC, deciding on regulatory and operational as well as on administrative and budgetary management matters should help improving the efficiency, coherence and performance of the agency. To this end, the Management Board should carry the relevant functions and should consist, in addition of t
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In the past the appointing authority powers were exercised by the Vice-Chair of the Management Committee of the BEREC Office. The Management Board of the new agency should delegate relevant appointing authority powers to the Executive Director, who would be authorised to sub-delegate those powers. This would contribute to an efficient management of the BEREC staff as well as to ensuring that the Management
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of the new agency and the implementation of the tasks assigned to it. The Management Board should appoint him/her on the basis of a list drawn up by the Commission following an open and transparent selection procedure in order to guarantee a rigo
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of the new agency and the implementation of the tasks assigned to it. The Management Board should appoint him/her on the basis of a list of experts drawn up by the Commission and by the representatives of the Member States following an open and transparent selection procedure in order to guarantee a rigo
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of the new agency and the implementation of the tasks assigned to it. The Management Board should appoint him/her on the basis of a list drawn up by
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) BEREC should be composed of the Board of Regulators, which is supported by the Contact Network and the Working Groups. The existing model of chairmanship of the Board of Regulators, based on a 'Troika' system of annual rotation of Chairs and Vice-Chairs, has helped to ensure continuity of BEREC's work and has thus contributed to the smooth operation of the Board of Regulators. An appointee as Chair must first serve a one-year term as Vice-Chair, followed by a one-year term as Chair, and thereafter, where possible, a further one- year term as Vice-Chair.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 a (new) (17a) In order to ensure that BEREC takes full account of the whole spectrum of policy interests and understands the possible impact of its measures, the Agency should actively engage with stakeholders through tools such as regular stakeholder consultations forums.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 a (new) (17a) Experience has shown the usefulness of an intermediate level between the Working Groups and Board of Regulators. The Contact Network should prepare documents for the plenary meetings of the Board of Regulators.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 b (new) (17b) The BEREC Office should provide all necessary professional and administrative support, including financial, organisational and logistical support, for the work of BEREC, such as preparation of agendas and minutes, reimbursement of the travel costs as well as, where necessary, the costs relating to the meetings of the Board of Regulators, Contact Network and Working Groups, workshops and other meetings, financing of studies and communication activities.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) BEREC should be independent as regards operational and technical matters and should enjoy legal, administrative and financial autonomy. To that end, it is necessary and appropriate that BEREC
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) As a Union
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to further extend the consistent implementation of the provisions of the regulatory framework for electronic communications
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to further extend the consistent implementation of the provisions of the regulatory framework for electronic communications within the scope of BEREC, the new agency should be open to the participation of regulatory authorities of third countries competent in the field of electronic communications that have entered into agreements with the Union to that effect, in
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to further extend the consistent implementation of the provisions of the regulatory framework for electronic communications within the scope of BEREC, th
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) BEREC should be allowed to engage in communication activities within its field of competence, which should not be detrimental to BEREC’s core tasks and should be carried out in accordance with relevant communication and dissemination plans adopted by the Management Board. The content and implementation of BEREC’s communication strategy should be coherent, relevant and coordinated with the strategies and activities of the
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) In order to carry out its tasks effectively, BEREC should have the right to request all necessary information from the Commission, the NRAs and, as a last resort, other authorities and undertakings, ensuring that the digital data of every European citizen and the Member States are kept secure at last, by way of an independent European strategy for digital sovereignty. Requests for information should be proportionate and not impose an undue burden on the addressees. NRAs, which are closest to the electronic communications markets, should cooperate with BEREC and have a timely and accurate provision of information to ensure that BEREC is able to fulfil its mandate. BEREC should also share with the
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26a) There are more frequent cases of media of different kinds aiming at misinformation and content manipulation (such as "fake news") appearing in different Member States. This constantly growing trend requires looking for and exchanging best practices, which would then limit or prevent the use of the media in this manner and would prevent social tension, which occurs as a result of these acts.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28)
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (‘BEREC’) is hereby established. It must preserve the essential concept of intergovernmental cooperation.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 BEREC shall act within the scope of Directive [...], Directive 2002/58/EC, Regulation (EC) No 531/2012, Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120 and Decision 243/2012/EU36 (Radio Spectrum Policy Programme) and any other Union act setting new tasks and powers for it. _________________ 36 Decision No 243/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (OJ L 81, 21.3.2012, p. 7).
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall pursue the same objectives as those of national regulatory authorities (‘NRAs’) referred to in Article 3 of the Directive. In particular, BEREC shall ensure a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications within the scope referred to in paragraph 2 and thereby contribute to the development of the harmonised internal market. It shall also promote non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in the provision of internet access services; open internet access; access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity; competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities; and the interests of the citizens of the Union.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall pursue the same objectives as those of national regulatory authorities (‘NRAs’) referred to in Article 3 of the Directive. In particular, BEREC shall
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially and transparently and shall draw upon the expertise available in the NRAs. Each Member State shall ensure that the NRAs have the adequate financial and human resources required to participate in the work of BEREC.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially and transparently.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially and transparently.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. BEREC shall draw upon expertise available in the NRAs. Each Member State shall ensure that its NRAs have adequate financial and human resources to participate in the work of BEREC.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. BEREC shall draw upon expertise available in the NRAs. Each Member State shall ensure that its NRAs have adequate financial and human resources to participate in the work of BEREC.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assist, advise and cooperate with the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council as well as NRAs, on request or on its own initiative, on any technical matter within its mandate, and assist and advise the European Parliament and the Council on request;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assist, advise
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) assist, on request, the NRAs, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, with regard to their relationship, discussions and exchanges with third parties, and assist the NRAs and the Commission in the dissemination of regulatory best practices to third parties;
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) advise the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, on request or its own initiative, on the outcome of its analysis of the regulatory impact of any matter regarding the dynamics of the internal market in its areas of competence;
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) assist and advise, including by means of reports, the European Parliament and the Council, following a reasoned request or on its own initiative, on any matter regarding electronic communications within its competence;
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new) Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new) (ab) promote cooperation among the NRAs, and between the NRAs and the Commission;
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a c (new) (ac) issue recommendations and disseminate regulatory best practices addressed to the NRAs in order to encourage consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications;
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a c (new) (ac) promote cooperation among the NRAs, and between the NRAs and the Commission;
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a d (new) (ad) issue recommendations and disseminate regulatory best practices addressed to the NRAs in order to encourage consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications;
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a d (new) Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a e (new) (ae) advise the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, on request or on its own initiative, on the outcome of its technical analysis of the regulatory impact of any matter regarding the dynamics of the market development on the electronic communications framework;
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a e (new) (ae) assist the Commission, where relevant, as a consultative body in relation to the preparation and adoption of legal acts in the field of electronic communications;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a f (new) (af) carry out tasks conferred on it by legal acts of the Union in particular by Directive [...]('Electronic Communications Code'), Regulation (EC) No 531/2012 and Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a f (new) (af) assist the Commission, where relevant, as a consultative technical expert body in relation to the preparation and adoption of legal acts in the field of electronic communications;
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) develop an economic model in order to assist the Commission in determining the maximum termination rates in the Union in accordance with Article 73 of the Directive , while taking into account the distinctive characteristics of each nation and their future changes;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) develop in very close cooperation with other NRAs an economic model in order to assist the Commission in determining the maximum termination rates in the Union in accordance with Article 73 of the Directive
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – indent 2 – on draft national measures related to the internal market procedures for market regulation in accordance with Articles 32, 33 and 66 of the Directive, with no power to impose them on Member States;
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 1 a (new) – on the consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications;
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 7 a (new) – on non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in the provisions of internet access services according to Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 a (new) – on market practices that might lead to a detrimental effect on non- discriminatory internet access, open internet, consumer rights and abusive practices;
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (ea) initiate a platform for the exchange of opinions and best practices in an effort to combat misinformation and misrepresentation of information such as "fake news" on the territory of the Union, which would aim to fight manipulation of public opinion through different media and media tools;
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. BEREC may, upon a reasoned request from the Commission, take on other specific tasks necessary for the accomplishment of its role in accordance with Article 1(2).
Amendment 98 #
2b. Composition of the Board of Regulators 1. The Board of Regulators shall be composed of one member for each Member State. That person shall be the head or other high-level representative of the NRA established in the Member State with primary responsibility for overseeing the day-to-day operation of the markets for electronic communications networks and services. In Member States with more than one NRA in accordance with Directive [...] ('Electronic Communications Code'), those NRAs shall agree on a common representative and the necessary coordination between the NRAs shall be ensured. 2. When carrying out the tasks conferred upon it by this Regulation, the Board of Regulators shall act independently. The members of the Board of Regulators shall neither seek nor accept any instruction from any government, from the Commission, or from any other public or private entity. 3. The NRAs shall nominate one high-level alternates as member for each Member State. 4. The Commission shall attend the meetings of the Board of Regulators as an observer and shall be represented at an appropriately high level. 5. Any third-country regulatory authorities that are invited by the Board of Regulators shall have observer status and shall be represented at an appropriately high level. 6. The Board of Regulators may invite any person whose opinion may be of interest to attend its meetings on a case-by-case basis as an observer.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. BEREC may, upon a reasoned request from the Commission, take on other specific tasks necessary for the accomplishment of its role in accordance with Article 1(2).
source: 601.241
2017/04/04
ITRE
279 amendments...
Amendment 163 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to the Protocol (No 1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union,
Amendment 164 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 3 b (new) – having regard to the Protocol (No 2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
Amendment 165 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 4 a (new) – having regard to the reasoned opinion of the Polish Senate,
Amendment 166 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 4 b (new) – having regard to the reasoned opinion of the Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic,
Amendment 167 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 4 c (new) – having regard to the reasoned opinion of the Maltese Parliament,
Amendment 168 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 4 d (new) – having regard to the opinion of the German Bundesrat,
Amendment 169 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 170 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Title 1 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the BEREC Office (Text with EEA relevance)
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Title 1 Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 a (new) having regard to the Protocol (No 1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union,
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 b (new) having regard to the Protocol (No 2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Regulation (EC) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 complements and supports, in so far as Union-wide roaming is concerned, the rules provided for by the regulatory framework for electronic communications and establishes certain tasks for BEREC. The regulatory framework for electronic communications has broadly achieved its general objective of ensuring a competitive sector providing significant end-user benefits. _________________ 23 Regulation (EC) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union (OJ L 172, 30.6.2012, p.10).
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council24
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 establishes common rules to safeguard equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in the provision of internet access services and related end- users’ rights and sets up a new retail pricing mechanism for Union-wide regulated roaming services. This regulation establishes additional tasks for BEREC, in particular the issuing of guidelines on the implementation of national regulatory authorities (‘NRAs’)
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The BEREC final guidelines on the Implementation by NRAs of European Net Neutrality Rules have been highly welcomed as valuable clarifications to guarantee a strong free and open internet by ensuring a consistent application of the rules to safeguard equal and non- discriminatory treatment of traffic in the provision of internet access services and related end-users rights.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) BEREC and the Office (‘BEREC Office’) were established by Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council25. BEREC replaced the European Regulators Group (‘ERG’)26 and was meant to contribute one the one hand to the development and on the other to the better functioning of the internal market for electronic communications networks and services by aiming to ensure a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications. The BEREC Office was established as a Community body with legal personality to carry out the tasks referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009, in particular the provision of professional and administrative support services to BEREC. _________________ 25 Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Office (OJ L 337, 18.12.2009, p.1). 26 Commission Decision 2002/627/EC of 29 July 2002 establishing the European Regulators Group for Electronic
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4a) By Decision 2010/349/EU1, the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States decided that the BEREC Office would have its headquarters in Riga. The Seat Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Latvia and the BEREC Office was signed on 24 February 2011 and entered into force on 5 August 2011. For the purpose of carrying out the BEREC Office's tasks in an efficient and cost-effective manner, it could be necessary to locate a staff member(s) in another Member State. Experience has shown that in this regard in particular there is a need for one or more liaison officers located in Brussels. _________________ (1) Decision taken by common accord between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 31 May 2010 on the location of the seat of the Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (2010/349/EU) (OJ L 156, 23.6.2010, p.12).
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) In its Communication of 6 May 2015 entitled ‘A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe’27, the Commission envisaged presenting proposals in 2016 for an ambitious overhaul of the regulatory framework for electronic communications focusing inter alia on a more effective regulatory institutional framework in order to make the telecoms rules fit for purpose as part of the creation of the right conditions for the digital single market. These include as a minimum the deployment of very high capacity connectivity networks, more coordinated management of radio spectrum for wireless networks and creating a level playing field for advanced digital networks and innovative services. The Communication pointed out that the changing market and technological environment make it necessary to strengthen the institutional framework by enhancing the role of BEREC. _________________ 27 COM(2015) 192 final. COM(2015) 192 final.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In its Resolution of 19 January 2016 ‘Towards a Digital Single Market
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In its Resolution of 19 January 2016 ‘Towards a Digital Single Market Act’, the European Parliament called on the Commission to integrate further the digital single market by ensuring that a more efficient institutional framework is in place. It
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In its Resolution of 19 January 2016 ‘Towards a Digital Single Market Act’, the European Parliament called on the Commission to integrate further the digital single market by ensuring that a more efficient institutional framework is in place. It can do this by strengthening the role, capacity and decision-making powers of BEREC in order to allow it to foster the consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications, to enable an efficient oversight of BEREC over the development of the single market and to help it to resolve cross-border disputes. The European Parliament also stresses, in this regard, the need to improve the financial and human resources and still further enhance the governance structure of BEREC.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) BEREC and the BEREC Office have made a positive contribution towards a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications. Notwithstanding, there are still significant disparities between Member States as regards regulatory practice.
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) BEREC and the BEREC Office have made a positive contribution towards a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications. Notwithstanding, there are still significant disparities between Member States as regards regulatory practice, for instance in the area of wholesale access products, where BEREC has not provided sufficient guidelines, which is affecting companies doing cross- border business. Moreover, the governance structure of BEREC and the BEREC Office is cumbersome and gives rise to unnecessary administrative burden. In order to ensure efficiency gains and synergies and to further contribute to the development of the internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union as well as to the promotion of access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and the interests of the citizens of the Union, this regulation aims to strengthen the role of BEREC and enhance its governance structure by establishing BEREC as a Union decentralised agency. This also corresponds to the need to reflect the significantly enhanced role played by BEREC following Regulation (EC) No 531/2012 which establishes tasks for BEREC in relation to Union-wide roaming, Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120 which establishes tasks for BEREC in relation to open internet access and Union-wide roaming, and the Directive which establishes a significant number of new tasks for BEREC such as issuing decisions and guidelines on several topics, reporting on technical matters, keeping registers and delivering opinions on internal market procedures for draft national measures on
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) BEREC and the BEREC Office have made a positive contribution towards a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications. Notwithstanding, there are
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The need for the regulatory framework for electronic communications to be consistently applied in all Member States is essential for the successful development of an internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union and the promotion of access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, of competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and of the interests of the citizens of the Union. In view of market and technological developments, which often entails an increased cross-border dimension, and to the experience so far in ensuring a consistent implementation in the electronic communications field, it is necessary to build on the work of BEREC and the
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The need for the regulatory framework for electronic communications to be consistently applied in all Member States is essential for the successful development of an internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union and the promotion of access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, of competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and of the interests of the citizens of the Union. In view of market and technological developments, which often entails an increased cross-border dimension, and to the experience so far in ensuring a consistent implementation in the electronic communications field, it is necessary to build on the work of BEREC and the BEREC Office and further develop them into a
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The need for the regulatory framework for electronic communications to be consistently applied in all Member States is essential for the successful development of an internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union and the promotion of access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, of competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and of the interests of the citizens of the Union. In view of market and technological developments, which often entails an increased cross-border dimension, and to the experience so far in ensuring a consistent implementation in the electronic communications field, it is necessary to build on the work of BEREC and the BEREC Office
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The need for the regulatory framework for electronic communications to be consistently applied in all Member States is essential for the successful development of an internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union and the promotion of access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, of competition in the
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The agency should be governed and operated
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) BEREC, as a technical body with expertise on electronic communications and composed of representatives from NRAs and the Commission, is best placed to be entrusted with tasks such as deciding on certain issues with a cross-border dimension, contributing to efficient internal market procedures for draft national measures
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) BEREC, as a technical body with expertise on electronic communications and composed of representatives from NRAs and the Commission, is best placed to be entrusted with tasks such as deciding on certain issues with a cross-border dimension, contributing to efficient internal market procedures for draft national measures (both as regards market regulation and assignments of rights of use for radio spectrum), providing the necessary guidelines to NRAs in order to ensure common criteria and a consistent regulatory approach, and keeping certain registries at Union level. This is without prejudice to the tasks established for NRAs, which are closest to the electronic communications markets and their local conditions. In order to carry out its
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) BEREC, as a technical body with expertise on electronic communications and composed of representatives from NRAs and the Commission, is best placed to be entrusted with tasks such as deciding on certain issues with a cross-border dimension, contributing to efficient internal market procedures for draft national measures (both as regards market regulation and assignments of rights of use for radio spectrum), providing the necessary guidelines to NRAs in order to ensure common criteria and a consistent regulatory approach, and keeping certain registries at Union level. This is without prejudice to the tasks established for NRAs, which are closest to the electronic communications markets and their local conditions. In order to carry out its tasks
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) BEREC, as a technical body with expertise on electronic communications and composed of representatives from NRAs
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) In order to ensure the consistent application of legislation throughout the Union, a consistency mechanism for cooperation between the national regulatory authorities should be established through BEREC. That mechanism should in particular apply where a national regulatory authority intends to adopt a measure intended to produce legal effects which may create a barrier to the internal market or create a lack of legal certainty on the common interpretation of Union legislation. It should apply where any national regulatory authority concerned requests that such matter should be handled in the consistency mechanism, in cases of crossborder disputes or on the basis of a complaint by an undertaking operating crossborder and impacted by such measures. That mechanism should be without prejudice to any measures that the Commission may take in the exercise of its powers under the Treaties.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) BEREC should also serve as a body for reflection, debate and advice for the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in the electronic communications field. BEREC should, accordingly, provide advice to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, upon their request or on its own initiative.
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Compared to the situation in the past where both a Board of Regulators and a Management Committee were running in parallel, having a single board giving general orientations for the activities of BEREC, deciding on regulatory and operational as well as on administrative and budgetary management matters should help improving the efficiency, coherence and performance of the agency. To this end, the Management Board should carry out the relevant functions and should consist,
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Compared to the situation in the past where both a Board of Regulators and a Management Committee were running in parallel, having a single board giving general orientations for the activities of BEREC, deciding on regulatory and operational as well as on administrative and budgetary management matters should help improving the efficiency, coherence and performance of the agency. To this end, the Management Board should carry the relevant functions and should consist
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Compared to the situation in the past where both a Board of Regulators and a Management Committee were running in
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In the past the appointing authority powers were exercised by the Vice-Chair of the Management Committee of the BEREC Office. The Management Board of the new agency should delegate relevant appointing authority powers to the
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In the past the term of office of the Chair and of the Vice-Chairs of the Board of Regulators was one year. In view of the additional tasks assigned to BEREC and the need to ensure annual and multiannual programming for its activities, it is crucial to ensure that the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson benefit from a stable and long- term mandate with an annual evaluation report.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In the past the term of office of the Chair and of the Vice-Chairs of the Board of Regulators was one year. In view of the additional tasks assigned to BEREC and the need to ensure annual and multiannual programming for its activities,
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) The Management Board should hold
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of the new agency and the implementation of the tasks assigned to it for a term of office of 2.5 years. The Management Board should appoint him/her on the basis of a list drawn up by the Commission following an open and transparent selection procedure in order to guarantee a rigo
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of the new agency and the implementation of the tasks assigned to it. The Management Board should appoint him/her on the basis of a list drawn up by the Commission following an open and transparent selection procedure in order to guarantee a rigo
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of the new agency and the implementation of the tasks assigned to it. The Management Board should appoint him/her on the basis of a list drawn up by the Commission following an open and transparent selection procedure in order to guarantee a rigo
Amendment 214 #
(16) The role of the
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of the new agency and the implementation of the tasks assigned to it. The Management Board should appoint him/her
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The role of the Executive Director, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Experience has shown that most of BEREC
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Experience has shown that most of BEREC’s tasks are better carried out through working groups, therefore the Management Board should be in charge of setting up working groups and appointing their members. In order to ensure a balanced approach, the working groups should be coordinated and moderated by members of the BEREC staff. Lists of qualified experts should be prepared in advance to ensure a quick set-up of certain working groups, in particular those related to internal market procedures for draft national measures on market regulation and on assignments of rights of use for radio
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Experience has shown that most of BEREC’s tasks are better carried out through working groups, therefore the Management Board should be in charge of setting up working groups and appointing their members. In order to ensure a balanced approach
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Experience has shown that most of BEREC’s tasks are better carried out through working groups, therefore the Management Board should be in charge of setting up working groups and appointing their members. In order to ensure a balanced approach, the working groups should be coordinated and moderated by members of the BEREC staff. Lists of qualified experts should be prepared in advance to ensure a quick set-up of certain working groups, in particular those related to internal market procedures for draft national measures on market regulation
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Experience has shown that most of BEREC’s tasks are better carried out through working groups, therefore the Management Board should be in charge of setting up working groups and appointing their members. In order to ensure a geographically balanced approach, the working groups should be coordinated and moderated by members of the BEREC staff. Lists of qualified experts should be prepared in advance to ensure a quick set- up of certain working groups, in particular those related to internal market procedures for draft national measures on market regulation and on assignments of rights of use for radio
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18)
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) As BEREC is competent for taking decisions with a binding effect, it is necessary to ensure that any natural or legal person subject to, or concerned by, a decision of BEREC has the right of appeal to a Board of Appeal, which is part of the agency but independent from its administrative and regulatory structure. As the decisions issued by the Board of Appeal are intended to produce legal effects towards third parties, an action for review of their legality may be brought to the General Court.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) As BEREC is competent for taking decisions with a binding effect, it is
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) (19a) The BEREC Office should have sufficient financial and human resources to carry out its tasks. The increased number of tasks assigned to BEREC and complexity of the tasks requested from the BEREC Office should be duly reflected in resource programming of the BEREC Office. Furthermore, the BEREC Office's composition of human resources should reflect the need for adequate balance between the temporary agents and external personnel.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 b (new) (19b) On 24th February 2011, a Headquarters Agreement ('Seat Agreement') was concluded between the Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (The BEREC Office) and the Government of the Republic of Latvia.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to guarantee the BEREC Office’s autonomy and independence, it should have its own budget, most of which comes essentially from a contribution from the Union. The Budget should reflect additional tasks assigned and enhanced role of the BEREC Office and BEREC. The financing of BEREC should be subject to an agreement by the budgetary authority as set out in point 31 of the Inter- institutional Agreement on budgetary discipline, on
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) BEREC should be independent as regards operational and technical matters and should enjoy legal, administrative and financial autonomy.
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) As a
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to further extend the consistent implementation of the provisions of the regulatory framework for electronic communications
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to further extend the consistent implementation of the provisions of the regulatory framework for electronic communications
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to further extend the consistent implementation of the provisions of the regulatory framework for electronic communications within the scope of BEREC, it
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) BEREC, supported by the BEREC Office, should be allowed to engage in communication activities within its field of competence, which should not be detrimental to BEREC
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) BEREC should be allowed to engage in communication activities within its field of competence, which should not be detrimental to BEREC’s core tasks and should be carried out in accordance with relevant communication and dissemination plans adopted by the Management Board. The content and implementation of BEREC’s communication strategy should be coherent, objective, relevant and coordinated with the strategies and activities of the Commission and the other institutions in order to take into consideration the broader image of the Union.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) In order to carry out its tasks effectively, BEREC should have the right to request all necessary information from the Commission, the NRAs and,
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) The
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) The BEREC Office, which was established as a Community body with legal personality by Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009,
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (‘BEREC’)
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (‘BEREC’)
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 BEREC shall act within the scope of Directive [...], Directive 2002/58/EC, Regulation (EC) No 531/2012, Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120 and Decision 243/2012/EU36 (Radio Spectrum Policy Programme) and any other Union act setting new tasks and powers. _________________ 36 Decision No 243/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (OJ L 81, 21.3.2012, p. 7).
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall pursue the same objectives as those of national regulatory authorities (
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially and transparently and shall draw upon the expertise available in the NRAs. Each Member State shall ensure that the NRAs have the adequate financial and human resources required to participate in the work of BEREC, ensuring compulsory presence of their representatives in the meetings organised by BEREC.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently, impartially and transparently.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assist, advise and cooperate with the Commission as well as NRAs, on request or on its own initiative, on any technical matter within its mandate, and
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assist, advise and cooperate with the Commission as well as NRAs, on request or on its own initiative, on any technical matter within its mandate, and assist and advise the European Parliament and the Council on request; promote competition and investments; protect end-users;
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assist, advise and cooperate with the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council as well as NRAs, on request or on its own initiative, on any technical matter within its mandate
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) assist, advise and cooperate with the
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) advise the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, on request or on its own initiative, on the outcome of its analysis of the regulatory impact of any matter regarding the dynamics of the internal market in its areas of competence;
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) advise the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, on request or on its own initiative, on relevant regulatory impact of any issue concerning the overall digital markets' dynamics;
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) issue recommendations and best practices, addressed to the NRAs in order to encourage better and consistent implementation on any technical matter within its mandate;
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new) (ab) assist, advise, including by means of reports, the European Parliament and the Council, following a reasoned request or on its own initiative on any matter regarding electronic communications within its competence;
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new) (ab) assist the Commission, as a consultative body in relation to the preparation and adoption of legal acts in the field of electronic communications;
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 a (new) – on regulatory issues that may create a barrier to the internal market or subject to divergences in the implementation of the legislative framework referred to in article 1 (2), by the national regulatory authorities or by other competent authorities , only : (a) in cases of crossborder disputes where competent national regulatory authorities have not been able to reach an agreement within a period of 3 months, after the case in question was referred to the last of those regulatory authorities (b) upon a request from a competent national regulatory authority (c) upon a complaint lodged by an undertaking providing electronic communications networks or services A decision shall be adopted in the shortest possible time frame and in any case within four months, except in exceptional circumstances, from the referral of the subject matter by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Board. The decision referred to in subparagraph 1 shall be reasoned and addressed to the national regulatory authorities concerned and binding on them. The Chair of the Board shall notify, without undue delay, the decision referred to in subparagraph 1 to the national regulatory authorities. It shall inform the Commission thereof. The decision shall be published on the website of BEREC without delay.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 a (new) – on the consolidation of the internal market for electronic communications in accordance with Article 32 of the Directive and on the consistent application of remedies in accordance with Article 33 of the Directive;
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 1 a (new) – on the consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications;
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 7 a (new) – on non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in the provision of internet access services according to Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120;
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) monitor and coordinate the action of NRAs in applying Regulation (EU) No 531/2012, in particular as regards the provision of regulated retail roaming services at domestic prices in the interests of end-users, the evolution of retail and wholesale charges for roaming services and on transparency and comparability of tariffs in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012;
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) monitor market developments, evaluate the needs for regulatory innovation and coordinate actions between national regulatory authorities to enable the development of new innovative electronic communication services and ensure convergence, in particular in the area of standardisation, numbering, and spectrum allocation;
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 a (new) – on market practices that might lead to a detrimental effect on non- discriminatory internet access, open internet and consumer rights and on abusive practices;
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 3 – on the evolution of retail and wholesale charges for roaming services and on transparency and comparability of tariffs in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012, and where necessary, make recommendations to the Commission ;
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) provide a framework within which national regulatory authorities can cooperate, and promote cooperation between the national regulatory authorities in those areas which are still not harmonised at Union level. BEREC shall take due into account of the outcome of such cooperation when formulating its opinions, recommendations and decisions. Where BEREC considers that binding rules on such cooperation are required, it shall make the appropriate recommendations to the Commission ;
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) launch a data innovation initiative to modernise, coordinate and standardise the collection of data by national regulatory authorities. Without prejudice to intellectual property rights and the required level of confidentiality, this data shall be made available to the public in an open, reusable and machine-readable format on the BEREC website and the European data portal ;
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (db) cooperate with the Consumer Protection Cooperation Network and relevant national competent authorities, as regards matters related to the provision of electronic communication services which may affect consumers' interests in several Member States ;
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (ea) evaluate the implementation and evolution of the abolishment of roaming charges in the Union, in particular by observing tariff fluctuations in domestic markets after 15 June 2017, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/... [amending Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 as regards rules for wholesale roaming markets] and Regulation (EU) No 2015/2120;
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. BEREC´s tasks shall be published on the website and updated accordingly to new assignments.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to compliance with relevant Union law, NRAs shall
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to compliance with relevant Union law, NRAs shall
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to compliance with relevant Union law, NRAs
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. BEREC shall promote cooperation between NRAs, and between NRAs and the Commission.
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. In so far as is necessary in order to achieve the objectives set out in this regulation and perform its tasks, BEREC may, where appropriate, consult the relevant NRAs and relevant stakeholders and cooperate with competent Union bodies, agencies, offices and advisory groups, with competent authorities of third countries and/or with international organisations
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. In so far as is necessary in order to achieve the objectives set out in this regulation and perform its tasks, BEREC may cooperate with competent Union bodies, agencies, offices and advisory groups, with competent authorities of Member States, third countries and/or with national or international organisations, in accordance to Article 26.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. In so far as is necessary in order to achieve the objectives set out in this regulation and perform its tasks, BEREC
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. BEREC may, where appropriate, consult interested parties and give them the opportunity to comment within a reasonable period. BEREC shall, without prejudice to Article 28, make the results of such consultations publicly available. Such consultations shall take place as early as possible in the decision-making process.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. BEREC shall carry out its tasks independently and impartially, without undue delay and ensuring a transparent decision-making process. BEREC shall also ensure that the public and interested parties are given objective, reliable and easily accessible information regarding all stages of BEREC's work process.
Amendment 286 #
4a. BEREC may, organise public consultation with all interested parties and give them the opportunity to comment within a reasonable period. BEREC shall make the results of such consultations publicly available.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Before adopting decisions, reports or other types of public deliverables, BEREC shall consult interested parties and give them the opportunity to comment within a reasonable period determined by the complexity of the matter and not shorter than 30 days. Without prejudice to Article 28, the results of the consultation procedure shall be published by BEREC.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Without prejudice to Articles 21 and following, BEREC shall make use of the expertise available in the NRAs and shall carry out its tasks in cooperation with the NRAs and the Commission. BEREC shall promote cooperation between all NRAs, as well as between NRAs and the Commission.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 a (new) Article 2 a Organisation of BEREC BEREC shall consist of: (a) Board of Regulators; (b) Contact Network; (c) Expert Working Groups ('Working Groups').
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 a (new) Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 b (new) Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 b (new) Article 2 b Tasks of BEREC Office The BEREC Office shall, in particular, have the following tasks: (a) to provide professional and administrative support services to BEREC; (b) to collect information from NRAs and exchange and transmit information in relation to the tasks of BEREC set out in Article 2; (c) to disseminate regulatory best practices among NRAs, in accordance with point ad of Article 2(1); (d) to assist in the preparation of the work and provide other support to ensure the smooth functioning of the Board of Regulators, the Contact Network and the Working Groups; (e) to participate in the activities of the Working Groups upon decision by their Co-Chairs; (f) to assist in the preparation and provide other support to ensure the smooth functioning of the Management Board; (g) to assist BEREC in public consultations.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 c (new) Article 2 c Meetings and Voting rules of the Board of Regulators 1. Meetings of the Board of Regulators shall be convened by its Chair and shall occur at least four times a year in ordinary session. Extraordinary meetings shall also be convened at the initiative of the Chair, at the request of the Commission or at the request of at least one third of the Board's members. The agenda of the meeting shall be set by the Chair and shall be made public. 2. Where appropriate to safeguard the independence of BEREC or to avoid any conflict of interests, the Chair may decide that certain items are to be discussed in the absence of the observers. 3. The Board of Regulators shall adopt decisions by a two-thirds majority of its members unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation or in another Union legal act. Each member or alternate shall have one vote. The decisions of the Board of Regulators shall be made public, and shall indicate the reservations of an NRA at its request. 4. The Board of Regulators shall adopt and make publicly available its rules of procedure. The rules of procedure shall set out in detail the arrangements governing voting, including the conditions under which one member may act on behalf of another member, the rules governing quorums, and the notification deadlines for meetings. Furthermore, the rules of procedure shall ensure that the members of the Board of Regulators are provided with full agendas and draft proposals in advance of each meeting so that they have the opportunity to propose amendments prior to the vote. The rules of procedure may, inter alia, set out a procedure for urgent votes and other practical arrangements for the operation of the Board of Regulators.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 d (new) Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 e (new) Article 2 e Contact Network 1. The Contact Network shall be composed of NRA representatives from Member States and the representatives of the Commission, the BEREC Office and third-country regulatory authorities. 2. The Contact Network shall assist the Board of Regulators in the fulfilment of its tasks, particularly by making the necessary preparations for the meetings of the Board of Regulators, such as processing of the documents developed by the Working Groups. 3. The Board of Regulators shall adopt rules of procedure laying down the practical arrangements for the operation of the Contact Network.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 f (new) Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 g (new) Article 2 g Tasks of the BEREC Office The BEREC Office shall, in particular, have the following tasks: (a) to provide professional and administrative support services to BEREC; (b) to collect information from NRAs and exchange and transmit information in relation to the tasks of BEREC set out in Article 2; (c) based on this data, to produce regular draft reports on specific aspects of developments of the European telecommunications market such as roaming and benchmarking reports, to be submitted to BEREC; (d) to disseminate regulatory best practices among NRAs, in accordance with point ad of Article 2(1); (e) to assist in the preparation of the work and provide other support to ensure the smooth functioning of the of the Board of Regulators, the Contact Network and the Working Groups. (f) to participate in the technical activities of the Working Groups upon decision by their Co-Chairs; (g) to assist in the preparation and provide other support to ensure the smooth functioning of the Management Board; (h) to assist BEREC in public consultations.
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 –
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – a
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 3 – Expert Working Groups;
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 4 Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. NRAs from European Economic Area (EEA) States and from those States that are candidates for accession to the European Union shall have observer status and shall be represented at an appropriate level. BEREC may invite other experts and observers to attend its meetings.
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Members of the management Board shall act on objective grounds, in the interest of the Union and towards reducing market fragmentation aiming at the creation of a the single market for telecommunications.
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The list of Members of the Management board, together with their declaration of interest, shall be made publicly available.
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Management Board shall be responsible for fulfilling BEREC's tasks as set out in Article 2, and shall do so by taking all necessary decisions and by providing guidance to the Executive Director. In doing so, it shall also rely on the work carried out by the working groups. The Management Board shall:
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) give the general orientations for BEREC’s activities and adopt each year BEREC’s single programming document
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) adopt,
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) adopt and proceed with an assessment of the consolidated annual activity report on BEREC
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point m Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point m (m) appoint the
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point n (n) appoint an Accounting Officer, subject to the Staff Regulations and the Conditions of Employment of other servants, who shall be totally independent in the performance of his/her duties. The BEREC Office may appoint the
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point o Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 320 #
3. The term of office of the Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson shall be
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The term of office of the Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson shall be
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Without prejudice to the powers of the Management Board, the Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson shall be independent in the performance of their duties and shall not take instructions from any institution, government, NRA, person or body.
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. The Chairperson shall report to the European Parliament on the performance of BEREC when invited to do so.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. The
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Articles 5(1) (a) and (b) and 22(8), the Management Board shall take decisions by a majority of two-thirds of members with voting rights.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 a (new) Article 8 a Independence 1. Members of the Management Board, when carrying out the tasks conferred upon them, shall act independently and objectively in the interest of the Union as a whole, regardless of national or personal interest. 2. Without prejudice to the powers of the Commission or national regulatory authorities, Members of the Management board shall not seek or take instructions from the institutions or bodies of the Union, from any government of a Member State or from any other public or private body. Members of the Board shall, in particular, carry out the tasks conferred upon them free from undue political influence and from commercial interference that would affect their personal independence.
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 2 – section 2 – title Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 2 – section 2 – title Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 2 – section 2 – title Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – title Responsibilities of the
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – title Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Executive Director shall
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Administrative Committee shall mutatis mutandis take the follow-up of BEREC Office. Under the guidance of the Management Board, the Administrative Committee shall provide administrative and support services to BEREC, as defined in paragraph 5 of this Article.
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to the powers of the Commission and the Management Board, the
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to the powers of the Commission and the Management Board, the Executive Director shall be independent in the performance of his/her duties and shall n
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to the powers of the
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. The Executive Director shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the performance of
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. The
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 350 #
5. The Executive Director shall be responsible for the implementation of BEREC’s tasks following the guidance provided by the Management Board. In particular, the Executive Director shall be responsible for:
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. The
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. The
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point c (c) preparing,, in coordination with the NRAs, the single programming document and submitting it to the Management Board;
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point f (f) preparing an action plan following- up conclusions of internal or external audit reports and evaluations, as well as investigations by the OLAF and reporting on progress
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point f (f) preparing an action plan following- up conclusions of internal or external audit
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point g (g)
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 6 Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 6 Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 6 6. The
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 6 6. The
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Where justified and in particular to implement the work programme of BEREC, the Management Board
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall appoint the members of the expert working groups, which may be
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall appoint the members of the working groups, which may be participated in by experts from the NRAs,
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In the case of the working groups which are set up to carry out the tasks referred to in the third indent of Article 2(1)(d), their members shall be appointed from the lists of qualified experts provided by the NRAs
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In the case of the working groups which are set up to carry out the tasks referred to in the third indent of Article 2(1)(d), their members shall be appointed from the lists of qualified experts provided by the NRAs
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 In the case of the working groups which are set up to carry out the tasks referred to in the second indent of Article 2(1)(d), their members shall be appointed exclusively from the lists of qualified experts provided by the NRAs
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 In the case of the working groups which are set up to carry out the tasks referred to in the second indent of Article 2(1)(d), their members shall be appointed exclusively from the lists of qualified
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. The working groups shall be coordinated and moderated by a member of
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. BEREC shall provide both administrative and content-related support to the working groups.
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. The Management Board shall appoint the Chairperson, the other members and their alternates from a list of
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 3 – title ESTABLISHMENT AND STRUCTURE OF THE BUDGET OF THE BEREC OFFICE
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Each year, the
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 The Management Board shall subsequently adopt the single programming document
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. The annual work programme shall comprise detailed objectives and expected results including performance indicators. It shall also contain a description of the actions to be financed and an indication of the financial and human resources allocated to each action, in accordance with the principles of activity-based budgeting and management. The annual work programme shall be coherent with the BEREC's annual work programme as referred to in Article 2e(5) and with the multi-annual work programme referred to in paragraph 4. It shall clearly indicate tasks that have been added, changed or deleted in comparison with the previous financial year. Any additional tasks shall be assessed in light of the available resources.
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Each year, the
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. The draft estimate of BEREC’s revenue and expenditure shall be sent by
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 4. The Co
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 386 #
2. Each year the
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. On receipt of the Court of Auditors’ observations on BEREC’s provisional accounts, BEREC’s accounting officer shall draw up BEREC’s final accounts under his/her own responsibility. The
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 5 5. The
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 7 7. The
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 8 8. The
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 The financial rules applicable to BEREC shall be adopted by the Management Board
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board, from a list of candidates proposed by the C
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 For the purpose of concluding the contract with the
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Before appointment, the candidate selected by the Management Board
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3. The term of office of the
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3. The term of office of the Executive Director shall be five years. By the end of that period, the C
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 4. The Management Board,
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 4. The Management Board, acting on a proposal from the C
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 5. The
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 6 6. An
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 7 7. The
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 7 7. The Executive Director may be removed from office only upon a decision of the Management Board
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 8 8. The Management Board shall reach decisions on appointment, extension of the term of office or removal from office of the
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 Amendment 408 #
1. The BEREC Office shall be an official body of the Union. It shall have legal personality.
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall be legally represented by the Executive Director.
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. BEREC shall be represented by the
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 To this end, BEREC may
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 BEREC and the BEREC Office shall be open to the participation of regulatory authorities of third countries competent in the field of electronic communications that have entered into agreements with the Union to that effect.
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Under the relevant provisions of these agreements, arrangements shall be developed specifying, in particular, the nature, extent and manner in which those regulatory authorities of the third countries concerned will participate in the work of BEREC
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 a (new) Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 2. Members of the Management Board, the
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where information is not available or is not made available by the NRAs in a timely fashion or in circumstances where a direct request by BEREC would prove more efficient and less burdensome, BEREC may address a duly justified and reasoned request to other authorities
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 a (new) Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Members, their alternates, and observers of the Management Board, the
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Members and their alternates of the Management Board
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Members of the Management Board, the
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The declarations shall be accurate and complete, made in writing and updated whenever necessary. The declarations of interests made by the members of the Management Board and the
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 2. Members and their alternates of the Management Board
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 2. Members of the Management Board, the
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 3 Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 1. The necessary arrangements concerning the accommodation to be provided for the BEREC Office in the host Member State and the facilities to be made available by that Member State as well as the specific rules applicable in the host Member State to the
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 1. The necessary arrangements concerning the accommodation to be provided for BEREC in the host Member State and the facilities to be made available
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 1. The necessary arrangements concerning the accommodation to be provided for BEREC in the host Member State and the facilities to be made available by that Member State as well as the specific rules applicable in the host Member State to
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 2 2. The BEREC Office’s host Member State, Latvia, shall provide the necessary conditions to ensure the smooth and efficient functioning of the BEREC Office, including multilingual, European-
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 1. No later than five years from the day of entry into force of this regulation, and every five years thereafter, the
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 2 2. Where the
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 3 Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 With effect from [the date of entry into force of this regulation] and until the
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 As interim
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The contract of employment of the Administrative Manager appointed on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 shall be terminated at the the end of his/her term of office or the day when the
source: 602.937
2017/05/05
LIBE
12 amendments...
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) BEREC should also serve as a body for reflection, debate and advice for the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in the electronic communications field. To that end, BEREC should, provide advice to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, upon their request or on its own initiative.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) BEREC should be independent as regards operational and technical matters and should enjoy legal, administrative and financial autonomy. To that end, it is necessary and appropriate that BEREC should be a body of the Union having legal personality and exercising the powers conferred upon it. BEREC should be legally distinct and functionally independent from the industry and government in that it neither seeks nor takes instructions from any third party, it operates in a transparent and accountable manner as set out in a law and it has sufficient powers.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. BEREC´s tasks shall be published on the website and updated in order to indicate its new tasks.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) assist, advise, including by means of reports, the European Parliament and the Council, following a reasoned request or on its own initiative on any matter regarding electronic communications within its competence;
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 6 a (new) - on common approaches to ensure that national measures regarding end- users' access to, or use of, services and applications through electronic communications networks respect the fundamental rights and freedoms, as guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union and general principles of Union law, in accordance with Article 93;
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 - a
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The public shall be able to access the full list of members of the Management Board including an indication whether or not the member is a Chair or Vice-Chair of the Board, their declaration of interests and a curriculum vitae. The information shall be published on the "Composition and organisation" section of BEREC's website.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Documents relating to the meetings of the Management Board shall be published on BEREC's website and shall include the agendas and minutes of meetings and any decisions taken, details of the members of the Management Board present, and a list of participants and observers who attended, the meeting, with due respect for Article 28.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point f (f) preparing an action plan following- up conclusions of internal or external audit reports and evaluations, as well as investigations by the OLAF and reporting on progress
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Working group members, including an indication of their particular role within the working group, a declaration of interests and a curriculum vitae must be made publicly available on BEREC's website.
source: 604.568
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/20 |
|
docs/20 |
|
events/9/date |
Old
2018-07-10T00:00:00New
2018-07-09T00:00:00 |
events/11/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5211)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5211)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE600.889New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-600889_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE602.937New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-602937_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.567&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-599567_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.723&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-599723_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE601.038&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-601038_EN.html |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30299&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9/docs |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
events/12 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title |
Old
Joint Declaration 2018New
Joint Declaration 2018-19 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/11/body |
EC
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0305&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0305_EN.html |
events/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0454New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0454_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/8/07883New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Body of European Regulators for Electronic CommunicationsNew
Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and Agency for Support for BEREC (BEREC Office) |
activities/1/committees/5/shadows/3 |
|
activities/5/committees/5/shadows/3 |
|
activities/6/committees/5/shadows/3 |
|
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/9 |
|
committees/5/shadows/3 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
3.30.06 Information and communication technologiesNew
3.30.06 Information and communication technologies, digital technologies |
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/dg-connectNew
http://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/dg-connect |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/dg-connectNew
http://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/dg-connect |
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Old
Economic and Social CommitteeNew
European Economic and Social Committee |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0591:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0591:EN
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htmNew
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/dg-connect |
activities/1/committees/5/shadows/5 |
|
committees/5/shadows/5 |
|
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htmNew
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/dg-connect |
activities/1/committees/5/shadows/2 |
|
committees/5/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/7/date |
2016-12-05T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/7/rapporteur |
|
committees/7/date |
2016-12-05T00:00:00
|
committees/7/rapporteur |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/5/date |
2016-12-01T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/5/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/5/shadows |
|
committees/5/date |
2016-12-01T00:00:00
|
committees/5/rapporteur |
|
committees/5/shadows |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0591:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/4/date |
2016-10-11T00:00:00
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
ITRE/8/07883
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|