BETA


2016/0409(COD) Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE COELHO Carlos (icon: PPE PPE) DALLI Miriam (icon: S&D S&D), HALLA-AHO Jussi (icon: ECR ECR), DEPREZ Gérard (icon: ALDE ALDE), JOLY Eva (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), MEUTHEN Jörg (icon: EFDD EFDD), FONTANA Lorenzo (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 082-p1, TFEU 085-p1-a3, TFEU 087-p2, TFEU 088-p2-a2

Events

2021/06/29
   EC - Follow-up document
2020/02/28
   EC - Follow-up document
2018/12/07
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to improve the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters with a view to making it more efficient, strengthening data protection and extending access rights.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending and repealing Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.

CONTENT: the Schengen Information System (SIS) constitutes an essential tool for the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union. This Regulation:

- establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

- lays down provisions on the technical architecture of SIS, on the responsibilities of the Member States and of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA), on data processing, on the rights of the persons concerned and on liability.

The Regulation is accompanied by two other regulations on the use of SIS: (i) in the field of border checks ; (ii) for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals.

Architecture

SIS comprises a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. National systems may contain a full or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States. The Central SIS and the communication infrastructure will have to be managed so as to ensure their functioning 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. For this reason, the agency "eu-LISA" will implement technical solutions to reinforce the continuous availability of SIS.

New category of alerts

The following are introduced into the system:

- alerts issued for the purpose of inquiry checks, an intermediary step between discreet checks and specific checks, which allow for individuals to be interviewed.

- alerts on unknown suspects or wanted persons, which provide for the introduction into the SIS of fingerprints or palm prints discovered at the scenes of serious crimes or terrorist incidents and which are considered to belong to a perpetrator.

- alerts of children at risk of parental abduction, and alerts on children and vulnerable adults who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection (e.g. when travel may lead to a risk of forced marriage, female genital mutilation, trafficking in human beings).

In the case of children, these alerts and the corresponding procedures should serve the best interests of the child. Such decisions shall be made immediately and not later than 12 hours after the child was located, in consultation with relevant child protection authorities, as appropriate.

The Regulation also permits the introduction of alerts concerning objects for seizure or as evidence in criminal proceedings, such as forged documents and high value objects, as well as computer equipment.

New categories of data

New data categories are introduced in SIS to allow end-users to take informed decisions based upon an alert without losing time. Therefore, in order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert should, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. If available, all relevant data, in particular the first name of the person concerned, must be inserted when creating an alert.

Biometric data

SIS will permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned. Any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data should: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued, (ii) be authorised by Union law, (iii) respect fundamental rights, including the best interests of the child, and (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection.

In order to avoid inconveniences caused by misidentification, SIS should also allow for the processing of data concerning individuals whose identity has been misused, subject to suitable safeguards, to obtaining the consent of the individual concerned for each data category, in particular palm prints, and to a strict limitation of the purposes for which such personal data can be lawfully processed.

Access to data

Europol will have access to all categories of data contained in the SIS and may exchange additional information with the SIRENE Bureaux of the Member States. In addition, Member States must inform Europol of any positive response when a person is wanted in connection with a terrorist offense. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency will also have access to the different categories of alerts in the SIS.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 27.12.2018.

By 28.12.2021, the Commission will adopt a decision setting the date on which the SIS is put into service under the Regulation after verifying that the relevant conditions are fulfilled.

2018/11/28
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2018/11/28
   CSL - Final act signed
2018/11/28
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/11/21
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/11/19
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2018/11/19
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2018/11/19
   CSL - Council Meeting
2018/10/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/10/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 555 votes to 67, with 20 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.

The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:

Purpose : the proposed Regulation seeks to introduce a series of improvements to SIS which shall increase its effectiveness, strengthen data protection and extend access rights. It establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.

Technical architecture : SIS includes a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. The national systems may contain a complete or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States . The availability of SIS shall be subject to close monitoring at central and Member State level and any incident of unavailability for end-users shall be registered and reported to stakeholders at national and Union level. Each Member State shall set up a backup for its national system.

The European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ( eu-LISA ) shall implement technical solutions to reinforce the uninterrupted availability of SIS.

Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.

Each SIRENE Bureau shall, in accordance with national law, have easy direct or indirect access to all relevant national information, including national databases and all information on its Member States’ alerts, and to expert advice, in order to be able to react to requests for supplementary information swiftly and within the deadlines. Member States shall ensure that end-users and the staff of the SIRENE Bureaux regularly receive training , including on data security, data protection and data quality.

Data security : Parliament specified that national plans for security , business continuity and disaster recovery shall ensure that: (i) unauthorised processing of data in the SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in the SIS is prevented; (ii) systems installed in the event of an interruption are restored ; (iii) the SIS correctly performs its functions, that faults are reported and personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.

Where a Member State cooperates with external contractors in any SIS-related tasks, it shall closely monitor the activities of the contractor to ensure compliance with all provisions of this Regulation, in particular on security, confidentiality and data protection.

Categories of data : the amended text provides for the introduction of new categories of data in the SIS to enable end-users to make informed decisions based on an alert without losing time.

In order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert shall, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. Where available, all the relevant data, in particular the forename of the individual concerned , shall be inserted when creating an alert.

Alerts : alerts on the following categories of persons shall be entered in SIS at the request of the competent authority of the issuing Member State:

missing persons who need to be placed under protection for their own protection and in order to prevent a threat to public order or public security; children at risk of abduction by a parent, a family member or a guardian, who need to be prevented from travelling; children who need to be prevented from travelling owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and (i) becoming victims of trafficking in human beings, or of forced marriage, female genital mutilation or other forms of gender-based violence; (ii) becoming victims of or involved in terrorist offences; or (iii) becoming conscripted or enlisted into armed groups; vulnerable persons who are of age and who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and becoming victims of trafficking in human beings or gender-based violence.

Actions and decisions by the competent authorities, including judicial authorities, following an alert on a child should be taken in cooperation with child protection authorities. The national hotline for missing children should be informed, where appropriate.

Within three years of entering an alert in the SIS, the issuing Member State shall review the need to keep it.

Biometric data : under the proposed Regulation, SIS shall permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned.

Parliament has specified that any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data shall: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued; (ii) be authorised by Union law; (iii) respect fundamental rights , including the best interests of the child; (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection .

It would also be possible to add a DNA profile to an alert in clearly defined cases where fingerprint data are not available. This DNA profile shall only be accessible to authorised users.

Access to the system : the proposed Regulation provides for enhanced access possibilities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.

The amendments adopted aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances under which access to SIS data is possible.

Documents
2018/10/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/11/15
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71)
2017/11/13
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
2017/11/10
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Carlos COELHO (EPP, PT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU

The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:

System architecture: the Commission’s proposal requires all Member States to have a national copy containing a complete or partial copy of the SIS database as well as a backup N.SIS. Given the risk to data security, Members believe that Member States should not be required to have a national copy in order to ensure the availability of the system. As an additional means of ensuring the uninterrupted availability of the SIS, Members proposed that a back-up communication infrastructure be developed and used in case of failure of the main communication infrastructure. In particular, the "CS-CIS" (containing the SIS database) or its backup version should contain an additional copy of the SIS database and be used simultaneously in active operation.

The CS-SIS and its back-up version should be installed at the technical sites of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of ​​freedom, security and justice (the "Eu-LISA agency").

Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.

The SIRENE Bureaux shall substantially reply to a request for supplementary information not later than six hours after the receipt of the request. In case of alerts for terrorist offences and in cases of alerts concerning, the SIRENE Bureaux shall act immediately.

To further increase the quality of data in SIS, the Agency should also offer training on the use of SIS to national training bodies and, insofar as possible, to SIRENE staff and to end-users.

Access to the system : the Commission proposal provides for increased access opportunities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The amendments introduced aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances in which it is possible to access the SIS data. It is also proposed to strengthen the safeguards in this respect, whether in terms of prior training or logging or oversight, indicating, in particular, the date and time of the data processing activity, the type of data processed and the name of the person responsible for data processing.

Europol should be immediately informed by Member States of all alerts created and positive replies to these alerts when a person or object is wanted by a Member State in relation to an offense referred to in Directive (EU) 2017/541 the fight against terrorism.

Data security : Members specified that each Member State shall, in relation to its N.SIS, adopt the necessary measures, including a security plan, a business continuity plan and a disaster recovery plan, that: (i) deny unauthorised persons access to data-processing equipment and facilities used for processing personal data; (ii) prevent the unauthorised processing of data in SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in SIS; (iii) ensure that the installed system may, in case of interruption, be restored; (iv) ensure that faults are reported and that personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.

In order to prevent the piracy of SIS by an external service provider, Members proposed that Member States cooperating with external contractors on any SIS-related tasks closely monitor contractors' activities to ensure compliance with all provisions of the Regulation, including in particular security, confidentiality and data protection.

Data protection : access to the system should be subject to all the legal provisions applicable to national data protection authorities and to the possibility for the supervisory authorities to verify the correct application of the legal provisions, in particular through the evaluation mechanism of Schengen introduced by Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 .

Members proposed a series of amendments that mainly aim to clarify what the applicable rules are. In addition, a number of provisions are strengthened and brought further in line with EU data protection framework, particularly Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Data entered in the SIS should not reveal sensitive information about the person, such as ethnicity, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation.

Specific amendments regarding alerts : Members pointed out that an alert should be introduced when a suspect is wanted in connection with an alleged terrorist offense. They also delineated the use of DNA data and defined the circumstances in which they can accompany an alert.

Missing persons : the category of children at risk of being abducted, including by a family member, or of being removed from the Member State for the purpose of torture, sexual or gender-based violence or of being victims of activities listed in Directive (EU) 2017/541 should be introduced in the SIS.

An alert concerning a child at risk should be entered, following a decision of the competent judicial authority of the Member State that has jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility where a risk exists that the child may be unlawfully and imminently removed from the Member State where that competent judicial authority is situated.

In the case of children subject to alerts, the executing Member State shall consult without delay the issuing Member State including its child protection authorities in order to agree without delay and at the latest within 12 hours on the measures to be taken in order to safeguard the best interest of the child.

The data entered in SIS must indicate which category the missing child at risk falls into, these being: (i) runaways; (ii) unaccompanied children in the context of migration ; (iii) children abducted by a family member.

Investigative controls : due to their nature these should be mandatory, in full compliance with all procedural safeguards. Members have tightened up the information requirements that Member States are required to provide to enable the competent authorities of the executing Member State to take action.

This information should be transmitted immediately to the issuing authority when border checks or verification, police and customs checks or other enforcement actions are carried out within a Member State.

Entry into force of the new provisions : in order to avoid long delays, as was the case with the SIS II legal framework, Members proposed that the new legal framework be implemented one year after its entry into force.

Documents
2017/11/06
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2017/11/06
   EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
2017/10/19
   EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
2017/09/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/09/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/08/03
   IT_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2017/06/27
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/06/12
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2017/06/09
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2017/06/09
   CSL - Council Meeting
2017/06/05
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2017/05/28
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2017/05/22
   ES_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2017/05/03
   EDPS - Document attached to the procedure
2017/04/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2017/03/09
   EP - COELHO Carlos (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2016/12/21
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to reform the Schengen Information System (SIS) in order to enhance the general provisions regarding police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 , Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU .

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: in 2016, the Commission carried out a comprehensive evaluation of SIS , three years after the entry into operation of its second generation. This evaluation showed that SIS has been a genuine operational success.

Nonetheless, the effectiveness and efficiency of the system should be further strengthened. To this end, the Commission is presenting a first set of three proposals to improve and extend the use of SIS as result of the evaluation while continuing its work to make existing and future law enforcement and border management systems more interoperable.

These proposals cover the use of the system for:

border management , police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters , and the return of illegally staying third country nationals .

CONTENT: the present proposal and the supplementary proposal on border management lay down rules covering the comprehensive end-to-end use of SIS, including the Central SIS managed by eu-LISA Agency, but also the needs of the end-user.

End-to-end use of SIS : with over 2 million end-users in the competent authorities across Europe, SIS is an extremely widely used and effective tool for information exchange. This proposal as well as the parallel proposal on border management include rules covering the complete end-to-end operation of the system, including Central SIS operated by eu-LISA, the national systems and the end-user applications. It addresses not only the central and national systems themselves, but also the end-users' technical and operational needs.

In order to use SIS to its full effectiveness Member States should ensure that each time their end-users are entitled to carry out a search in a national police or immigration database, they also search SIS in parallel. This way SIS can fulfil its objective as the main compensatory measure in the area without internal border controls and Member States can better address the cross-border dimension of criminality and the mobility of criminals.

Data quality : the proposal maintains the principle that the Member State, which is the data owner, is also responsible for the accuracy of the data entered in SIS. It is, however, necessary to provide for a central mechanism managed by eu-LISA which allows Member States to regularly review those alerts in which the mandatory data fields may raise quality concerns.

The proposal empowers eu-LISA to produce data quality reports to Member States at regular intervals.

Photographs, facial images, dactylographic data and DNA profiles : the possibility to search with fingerprints with a view to identify a person is already set out in existing Regulation. Two new proposals make this search mandatory if the identity of the person cannot be ascertained in any other way.

Currently, facial images can only be used to confirm a person's identity following an alphanumeric search, rather than as the basis for a search. Furthermore, changes make provision for facial images, photographs and palm prints to be used to search the system and identify people, when this becomes technically possible. Dactylography refers to the scientific study of fingerprints as a method of identification. Palm prints can be used to establish a person's identity in the same way that fingerprints can be used.

In cases where fingerprints or palm prints are not available, the proposal allows for the use of DNA profiles for missing persons who need to be placed under protection, especially children. This functionality will be used only in the absence of fingerprints and will be accessible only to authorised users.

The proposed changes will also allow SIS alerts to be issued for unknown persons wanted in connection with a crime, based on fingerprints or palm prints. This new alert category complements the Prüm provisions that enable interconnectivity of national criminal fingerprint identification systems. Via the Prüm mechanism, a Member State can launch a request to ascertain if the perpetrator of a crime whose fingerprints have been found is known in any other Member State (usually for investigative purposes). A person can be identified via the Prüm mechanism only if he or she has been fingerprinted in another Member State for criminal purposes. Hence, first time offenders cannot be identified.

Under this proposal, the storage of fingerprints of unknown wanted persons , will enable the fingerprints of an unknown perpetrator to be uploaded into SIS so that he or she can be identified as wanted if encountered in another Member State.

It should be noted that the use of this functionality presupposes that the Member States conducted a prior consultation of all available national and international sources but could not ascertain the identity of the person concerned.

Access to SIS by immigration authorities – institutional users : users such as Europol, Eurojust and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall have access to SIS and SIS data that they need. Appropriate safeguards are put in place to ensure that the data in the system is properly protected requiring that these bodies may only access the data they need to carry out their tasks.

Provisions are also laid down enabling immigration authorities to access SIS.

Suspension of certain alerts : the proposal provides for Member States to temporarily suspend alerts for arrest (in case of an ongoing police operation or investigation), making them visible only to SIRENE Bureaux but not to the officers on the ground for a limited period of time. This provision helps to avoid that a confidential police operation to arrest a highly wanted offender is jeopardised by a police officer who is not involved in the matter.

Provisions are laid down for alerts on missing persons. Changes to these allow preventive alerts to be issued in cases where parental abduction is deemed a high risk, and provide for more finely tuned categorisation of missing persons alerts. These changes will mean that, where there is a high risk of imminent parental abduction, border guards and law enforcement officials are made aware of the risk and will be able to examine more closely the circumstances where an at-risk child is travelling, taking the child into protective custody if required. This alert will require an appropriate decision of the judicial authorities granting custody only to one of the parents.

Inquiry check : the proposal introduces a new form of check, the 'inquiry check'. This is, in particular, intended to support measures to counter terrorism and serious crime. It allows authorities to stop and question the person concerned. It is more in-depth than the existing discreet check, but does not involve searching the person and does not amount to arresting him or her. It may, however, provide sufficient information to decide on further action to be taken.

An expanded list of objects is set out for which alerts can be issued, adding falsified documents, falsified banknotes, IT equipment, component parts of vehicles, etc.

Data protection and security : the proposal clarifies responsibility for preventing, reporting and responding to incidents that might affect the security or integrity of SIS infrastructure, SIS data or supplementary information. It provides that the Commission remains responsible for the contractual management of the SIS communication infrastructure, including tasks which will be transferred to eu-LISA.

Categories of data and data processing : in order to provide more and more precise information to the end-users to facilitate and accelerate the required action as well as to allow the better identification of the alert subject, this proposal expands the types of information that can be held about people for whom an alert has been issued.

The proposal also expands the list of personal data that may be entered and processed in SIS for the purpose of dealing with misused identities as more data facilitates the victim and the perpetrator of misused identity . The extension of this provision entails no risk as all these data can only be entered upon the consent of the victim of misused identity.

This will now also include:

facial images; palm prints; details of identity documents; the victim's address; the names of the victim's father and mother.

The proposal sets out the rights for data subjects to access data, rectify inaccurate data and erase unlawfully stored data.

Lastly, provisions are laid down as regards statistics on the use of the SIS.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the estimated cost is EUR 64.3 million from 2018-2020.

Documents

Votes

A8-0349/2017 - Carlos Coelho - Am 298 24/10/2018 13:35:34.000 #

2018/10/24 Outcome: +: 555, -: 67, 0: 20
DE IT FR PL ES GB RO BE CZ HU SE BG NL PT SK FI AT HR LT SI LU MT LV IE EE DK CY ?? EL
Total
84
61
64
45
48
58
27
20
20
16
19
14
23
18
12
11
18
9
8
8
6
6
6
8
4
6
5
2
14
icon: PPE PPE
185

United Kingdom PPE

2

Belgium PPE

3

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
2
icon: S&D S&D
167

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Greece S&D

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1
3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
27

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Romania NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
34

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
5
AmendmentsDossier
425 2016/0409(COD)
2017/09/07 LIBE 425 amendments...
source: 609.654

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2016-12-21T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/7
date
2021-06-29T00:00:00
docs
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/8
date
2017-05-28T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/8
date
2021-06-29T00:00:00
docs
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/9
date
2017-06-05T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/9
date
2017-05-29T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/10
date
2017-06-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/10
date
2017-06-06T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/11
date
2017-08-03T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
IT_CHAMBER
docs/11
date
2017-06-13T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/12
date
2017-05-22T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
ES_PARLIAMENT
docs/12
date
2017-08-04T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
IT_CHAMBER
docs/13
date
2017-05-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883
type
Contribution
body
ES_PARLIAMENT
events/0/body
Old
EP
New
EC
events/0/date
Old
2017-04-06T00:00:00
New
2016-12-21T00:00:00
events/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0883/COM_COM(2016)0883_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0883
  • url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0883 title: EUR-Lex
events/0/summary
  • PURPOSE: to reform the Schengen Information System (SIS) in order to enhance the general provisions regarding police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 , Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU .
  • PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
  • BACKGROUND: in 2016, the Commission carried out a comprehensive evaluation of SIS , three years after the entry into operation of its second generation. This evaluation showed that SIS has been a genuine operational success.
  • Nonetheless, the effectiveness and efficiency of the system should be further strengthened. To this end, the Commission is presenting a first set of three proposals to improve and extend the use of SIS as result of the evaluation while continuing its work to make existing and future law enforcement and border management systems more interoperable.
  • These proposals cover the use of the system for:
  • border management , police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters , and the return of illegally staying third country nationals .
  • CONTENT: the present proposal and the supplementary proposal on border management lay down rules covering the comprehensive end-to-end use of SIS, including the Central SIS managed by eu-LISA Agency, but also the needs of the end-user.
  • End-to-end use of SIS : with over 2 million end-users in the competent authorities across Europe, SIS is an extremely widely used and effective tool for information exchange. This proposal as well as the parallel proposal on border management include rules covering the complete end-to-end operation of the system, including Central SIS operated by eu-LISA, the national systems and the end-user applications. It addresses not only the central and national systems themselves, but also the end-users' technical and operational needs.
  • In order to use SIS to its full effectiveness Member States should ensure that each time their end-users are entitled to carry out a search in a national police or immigration database, they also search SIS in parallel. This way SIS can fulfil its objective as the main compensatory measure in the area without internal border controls and Member States can better address the cross-border dimension of criminality and the mobility of criminals.
  • Data quality : the proposal maintains the principle that the Member State, which is the data owner, is also responsible for the accuracy of the data entered in SIS. It is, however, necessary to provide for a central mechanism managed by eu-LISA which allows Member States to regularly review those alerts in which the mandatory data fields may raise quality concerns.
  • The proposal empowers eu-LISA to produce data quality reports to Member States at regular intervals.
  • Photographs, facial images, dactylographic data and DNA profiles : the possibility to search with fingerprints with a view to identify a person is already set out in existing Regulation. Two new proposals make this search mandatory if the identity of the person cannot be ascertained in any other way.
  • Currently, facial images can only be used to confirm a person's identity following an alphanumeric search, rather than as the basis for a search. Furthermore, changes make provision for facial images, photographs and palm prints to be used to search the system and identify people, when this becomes technically possible. Dactylography refers to the scientific study of fingerprints as a method of identification. Palm prints can be used to establish a person's identity in the same way that fingerprints can be used.
  • In cases where fingerprints or palm prints are not available, the proposal allows for the use of DNA profiles for missing persons who need to be placed under protection, especially children. This functionality will be used only in the absence of fingerprints and will be accessible only to authorised users.
  • The proposed changes will also allow SIS alerts to be issued for unknown persons wanted in connection with a crime, based on fingerprints or palm prints. This new alert category complements the Prüm provisions that enable interconnectivity of national criminal fingerprint identification systems. Via the Prüm mechanism, a Member State can launch a request to ascertain if the perpetrator of a crime whose fingerprints have been found is known in any other Member State (usually for investigative purposes). A person can be identified via the Prüm mechanism only if he or she has been fingerprinted in another Member State for criminal purposes. Hence, first time offenders cannot be identified.
  • Under this proposal, the storage of fingerprints of unknown wanted persons , will enable the fingerprints of an unknown perpetrator to be uploaded into SIS so that he or she can be identified as wanted if encountered in another Member State.
  • It should be noted that the use of this functionality presupposes that the Member States conducted a prior consultation of all available national and international sources but could not ascertain the identity of the person concerned.
  • Access to SIS by immigration authorities – institutional users : users such as Europol, Eurojust and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall have access to SIS and SIS data that they need. Appropriate safeguards are put in place to ensure that the data in the system is properly protected requiring that these bodies may only access the data they need to carry out their tasks.
  • Provisions are also laid down enabling immigration authorities to access SIS.
  • Suspension of certain alerts : the proposal provides for Member States to temporarily suspend alerts for arrest (in case of an ongoing police operation or investigation), making them visible only to SIRENE Bureaux but not to the officers on the ground for a limited period of time. This provision helps to avoid that a confidential police operation to arrest a highly wanted offender is jeopardised by a police officer who is not involved in the matter.
  • Provisions are laid down for alerts on missing persons. Changes to these allow preventive alerts to be issued in cases where parental abduction is deemed a high risk, and provide for more finely tuned categorisation of missing persons alerts. These changes will mean that, where there is a high risk of imminent parental abduction, border guards and law enforcement officials are made aware of the risk and will be able to examine more closely the circumstances where an at-risk child is travelling, taking the child into protective custody if required. This alert will require an appropriate decision of the judicial authorities granting custody only to one of the parents.
  • Inquiry check : the proposal introduces a new form of check, the 'inquiry check'. This is, in particular, intended to support measures to counter terrorism and serious crime. It allows authorities to stop and question the person concerned. It is more in-depth than the existing discreet check, but does not involve searching the person and does not amount to arresting him or her. It may, however, provide sufficient information to decide on further action to be taken.
  • An expanded list of objects is set out for which alerts can be issued, adding falsified documents, falsified banknotes, IT equipment, component parts of vehicles, etc.
  • Data protection and security : the proposal clarifies responsibility for preventing, reporting and responding to incidents that might affect the security or integrity of SIS infrastructure, SIS data or supplementary information. It provides that the Commission remains responsible for the contractual management of the SIS communication infrastructure, including tasks which will be transferred to eu-LISA.
  • Categories of data and data processing : in order to provide more and more precise information to the end-users to facilitate and accelerate the required action as well as to allow the better identification of the alert subject, this proposal expands the types of information that can be held about people for whom an alert has been issued.
  • The proposal also expands the list of personal data that may be entered and processed in SIS for the purpose of dealing with misused identities as more data facilitates the victim and the perpetrator of misused identity . The extension of this provision entails no risk as all these data can only be entered upon the consent of the victim of misused identity.
  • This will now also include:
  • facial images; palm prints; details of identity documents; the victim's address; the names of the victim's father and mother.
  • The proposal sets out the rights for data subjects to access data, rectify inaccurate data and erase unlawfully stored data.
  • Lastly, provisions are laid down as regards statistics on the use of the SIS.
  • BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the estimated cost is EUR 64.3 million from 2018-2020.
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
New
Legislative proposal published
events/1/body
Old
CSL
New
EP
events/1/date
Old
2017-06-09T00:00:00
New
2017-04-06T00:00:00
events/1/docs
  • url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 title: 3545
events/1/type
Old
Debate in Council
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/2/body
Old
EP
New
CSL
events/2/date
Old
2017-10-19T00:00:00
New
2017-06-09T00:00:00
events/2/docs
  • url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 title: 3545
events/2/type
Old
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
New
Debate in Council
events/3/date
Old
2017-11-06T00:00:00
New
2017-10-19T00:00:00
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading
New
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
events/4/type
Old
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/5/date
Old
2017-11-10T00:00:00
New
2017-11-06T00:00:00
events/5/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0349_EN.html title: A8-0349/2017
events/5/summary
  • The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Carlos COELHO (EPP, PT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU
  • The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
  • System architecture: the Commission’s proposal requires all Member States to have a national copy containing a complete or partial copy of the SIS database as well as a backup N.SIS. Given the risk to data security, Members believe that Member States should not be required to have a national copy in order to ensure the availability of the system. As an additional means of ensuring the uninterrupted availability of the SIS, Members proposed that a back-up communication infrastructure be developed and used in case of failure of the main communication infrastructure. In particular, the "CS-CIS" (containing the SIS database) or its backup version should contain an additional copy of the SIS database and be used simultaneously in active operation.
  • The CS-SIS and its back-up version should be installed at the technical sites of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of ​​freedom, security and justice (the "Eu-LISA agency").
  • Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.
  • The SIRENE Bureaux shall substantially reply to a request for supplementary information not later than six hours after the receipt of the request. In case of alerts for terrorist offences and in cases of alerts concerning, the SIRENE Bureaux shall act immediately.
  • To further increase the quality of data in SIS, the Agency should also offer training on the use of SIS to national training bodies and, insofar as possible, to SIRENE staff and to end-users.
  • Access to the system : the Commission proposal provides for increased access opportunities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The amendments introduced aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances in which it is possible to access the SIS data. It is also proposed to strengthen the safeguards in this respect, whether in terms of prior training or logging or oversight, indicating, in particular, the date and time of the data processing activity, the type of data processed and the name of the person responsible for data processing.
  • Europol should be immediately informed by Member States of all alerts created and positive replies to these alerts when a person or object is wanted by a Member State in relation to an offense referred to in Directive (EU) 2017/541 the fight against terrorism.
  • Data security : Members specified that each Member State shall, in relation to its N.SIS, adopt the necessary measures, including a security plan, a business continuity plan and a disaster recovery plan, that: (i) deny unauthorised persons access to data-processing equipment and facilities used for processing personal data; (ii) prevent the unauthorised processing of data in SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in SIS; (iii) ensure that the installed system may, in case of interruption, be restored; (iv) ensure that faults are reported and that personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.
  • In order to prevent the piracy of SIS by an external service provider, Members proposed that Member States cooperating with external contractors on any SIS-related tasks closely monitor contractors' activities to ensure compliance with all provisions of the Regulation, including in particular security, confidentiality and data protection.
  • Data protection : access to the system should be subject to all the legal provisions applicable to national data protection authorities and to the possibility for the supervisory authorities to verify the correct application of the legal provisions, in particular through the evaluation mechanism of Schengen introduced by Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 .
  • Members proposed a series of amendments that mainly aim to clarify what the applicable rules are. In addition, a number of provisions are strengthened and brought further in line with EU data protection framework, particularly Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • Data entered in the SIS should not reveal sensitive information about the person, such as ethnicity, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation.
  • Specific amendments regarding alerts : Members pointed out that an alert should be introduced when a suspect is wanted in connection with an alleged terrorist offense. They also delineated the use of DNA data and defined the circumstances in which they can accompany an alert.
  • Missing persons : the category of children at risk of being abducted, including by a family member, or of being removed from the Member State for the purpose of torture, sexual or gender-based violence or of being victims of activities listed in Directive (EU) 2017/541 should be introduced in the SIS.
  • An alert concerning a child at risk should be entered, following a decision of the competent judicial authority of the Member State that has jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility where a risk exists that the child may be unlawfully and imminently removed from the Member State where that competent judicial authority is situated.
  • In the case of children subject to alerts, the executing Member State shall consult without delay the issuing Member State including its child protection authorities in order to agree without delay and at the latest within 12 hours on the measures to be taken in order to safeguard the best interest of the child.
  • The data entered in SIS must indicate which category the missing child at risk falls into, these being: (i) runaways; (ii) unaccompanied children in the context of migration ; (iii) children abducted by a family member.
  • Investigative controls : due to their nature these should be mandatory, in full compliance with all procedural safeguards. Members have tightened up the information requirements that Member States are required to provide to enable the competent authorities of the executing Member State to take action.
  • This information should be transmitted immediately to the issuing authority when border checks or verification, police and customs checks or other enforcement actions are carried out within a Member State.
  • Entry into force of the new provisions : in order to avoid long delays, as was the case with the SIS II legal framework, Members proposed that the new legal framework be implemented one year after its entry into force.
events/5/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
New
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
events/6/date
Old
2017-11-13T00:00:00
New
2017-11-10T00:00:00
events/6/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0349_EN.html title: A8-0349/2017
events/6/summary
  • The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Carlos COELHO (EPP, PT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU
  • The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
  • System architecture: the Commission’s proposal requires all Member States to have a national copy containing a complete or partial copy of the SIS database as well as a backup N.SIS. Given the risk to data security, Members believe that Member States should not be required to have a national copy in order to ensure the availability of the system. As an additional means of ensuring the uninterrupted availability of the SIS, Members proposed that a back-up communication infrastructure be developed and used in case of failure of the main communication infrastructure. In particular, the "CS-CIS" (containing the SIS database) or its backup version should contain an additional copy of the SIS database and be used simultaneously in active operation.
  • The CS-SIS and its back-up version should be installed at the technical sites of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of ​​freedom, security and justice (the "Eu-LISA agency").
  • Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.
  • The SIRENE Bureaux shall substantially reply to a request for supplementary information not later than six hours after the receipt of the request. In case of alerts for terrorist offences and in cases of alerts concerning, the SIRENE Bureaux shall act immediately.
  • To further increase the quality of data in SIS, the Agency should also offer training on the use of SIS to national training bodies and, insofar as possible, to SIRENE staff and to end-users.
  • Access to the system : the Commission proposal provides for increased access opportunities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The amendments introduced aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances in which it is possible to access the SIS data. It is also proposed to strengthen the safeguards in this respect, whether in terms of prior training or logging or oversight, indicating, in particular, the date and time of the data processing activity, the type of data processed and the name of the person responsible for data processing.
  • Europol should be immediately informed by Member States of all alerts created and positive replies to these alerts when a person or object is wanted by a Member State in relation to an offense referred to in Directive (EU) 2017/541 the fight against terrorism.
  • Data security : Members specified that each Member State shall, in relation to its N.SIS, adopt the necessary measures, including a security plan, a business continuity plan and a disaster recovery plan, that: (i) deny unauthorised persons access to data-processing equipment and facilities used for processing personal data; (ii) prevent the unauthorised processing of data in SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in SIS; (iii) ensure that the installed system may, in case of interruption, be restored; (iv) ensure that faults are reported and that personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.
  • In order to prevent the piracy of SIS by an external service provider, Members proposed that Member States cooperating with external contractors on any SIS-related tasks closely monitor contractors' activities to ensure compliance with all provisions of the Regulation, including in particular security, confidentiality and data protection.
  • Data protection : access to the system should be subject to all the legal provisions applicable to national data protection authorities and to the possibility for the supervisory authorities to verify the correct application of the legal provisions, in particular through the evaluation mechanism of Schengen introduced by Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 .
  • Members proposed a series of amendments that mainly aim to clarify what the applicable rules are. In addition, a number of provisions are strengthened and brought further in line with EU data protection framework, particularly Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • Data entered in the SIS should not reveal sensitive information about the person, such as ethnicity, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation.
  • Specific amendments regarding alerts : Members pointed out that an alert should be introduced when a suspect is wanted in connection with an alleged terrorist offense. They also delineated the use of DNA data and defined the circumstances in which they can accompany an alert.
  • Missing persons : the category of children at risk of being abducted, including by a family member, or of being removed from the Member State for the purpose of torture, sexual or gender-based violence or of being victims of activities listed in Directive (EU) 2017/541 should be introduced in the SIS.
  • An alert concerning a child at risk should be entered, following a decision of the competent judicial authority of the Member State that has jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility where a risk exists that the child may be unlawfully and imminently removed from the Member State where that competent judicial authority is situated.
  • In the case of children subject to alerts, the executing Member State shall consult without delay the issuing Member State including its child protection authorities in order to agree without delay and at the latest within 12 hours on the measures to be taken in order to safeguard the best interest of the child.
  • The data entered in SIS must indicate which category the missing child at risk falls into, these being: (i) runaways; (ii) unaccompanied children in the context of migration ; (iii) children abducted by a family member.
  • Investigative controls : due to their nature these should be mandatory, in full compliance with all procedural safeguards. Members have tightened up the information requirements that Member States are required to provide to enable the competent authorities of the executing Member State to take action.
  • This information should be transmitted immediately to the issuing authority when border checks or verification, police and customs checks or other enforcement actions are carried out within a Member State.
  • Entry into force of the new provisions : in order to avoid long delays, as was the case with the SIS II legal framework, Members proposed that the new legal framework be implemented one year after its entry into force.
events/6/type
Old
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
New
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
events/7/date
Old
2017-11-15T00:00:00
New
2017-11-13T00:00:00
events/7/type
Old
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71)
New
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
events/8/date
Old
2018-10-23T00:00:00
New
2017-11-15T00:00:00
events/8/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-10-23-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/8/type
Old
Debate in Parliament
New
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71)
events/9/date
Old
2018-10-24T00:00:00
New
2018-10-23T00:00:00
events/9/docs/0
url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-10-23-TOC_EN.html
title
Debate in Parliament
events/9/docs/0
url
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30406&l=en
title
Results of vote in Parliament
events/9/type
Old
Results of vote in Parliament
New
Debate in Parliament
events/10/docs/0
url
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30406&l=en
title
Results of vote in Parliament
events/10/docs/0
url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0413_EN.html
title
T8-0413/2018
events/10/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 555 votes to 67, with 20 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.
  • The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
  • Purpose : the proposed Regulation seeks to introduce a series of improvements to SIS which shall increase its effectiveness, strengthen data protection and extend access rights. It establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
  • Technical architecture : SIS includes a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. The national systems may contain a complete or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States . The availability of SIS shall be subject to close monitoring at central and Member State level and any incident of unavailability for end-users shall be registered and reported to stakeholders at national and Union level. Each Member State shall set up a backup for its national system.
  • The European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ( eu-LISA ) shall implement technical solutions to reinforce the uninterrupted availability of SIS.
  • Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.
  • Each SIRENE Bureau shall, in accordance with national law, have easy direct or indirect access to all relevant national information, including national databases and all information on its Member States’ alerts, and to expert advice, in order to be able to react to requests for supplementary information swiftly and within the deadlines. Member States shall ensure that end-users and the staff of the SIRENE Bureaux regularly receive training , including on data security, data protection and data quality.
  • Data security : Parliament specified that national plans for security , business continuity and disaster recovery shall ensure that: (i) unauthorised processing of data in the SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in the SIS is prevented; (ii) systems installed in the event of an interruption are restored ; (iii) the SIS correctly performs its functions, that faults are reported and personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.
  • Where a Member State cooperates with external contractors in any SIS-related tasks, it shall closely monitor the activities of the contractor to ensure compliance with all provisions of this Regulation, in particular on security, confidentiality and data protection.
  • Categories of data : the amended text provides for the introduction of new categories of data in the SIS to enable end-users to make informed decisions based on an alert without losing time.
  • In order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert shall, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. Where available, all the relevant data, in particular the forename of the individual concerned , shall be inserted when creating an alert.
  • Alerts : alerts on the following categories of persons shall be entered in SIS at the request of the competent authority of the issuing Member State:
  • missing persons who need to be placed under protection for their own protection and in order to prevent a threat to public order or public security; children at risk of abduction by a parent, a family member or a guardian, who need to be prevented from travelling; children who need to be prevented from travelling owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and (i) becoming victims of trafficking in human beings, or of forced marriage, female genital mutilation or other forms of gender-based violence; (ii) becoming victims of or involved in terrorist offences; or (iii) becoming conscripted or enlisted into armed groups; vulnerable persons who are of age and who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and becoming victims of trafficking in human beings or gender-based violence.
  • Actions and decisions by the competent authorities, including judicial authorities, following an alert on a child should be taken in cooperation with child protection authorities. The national hotline for missing children should be informed, where appropriate.
  • Within three years of entering an alert in the SIS, the issuing Member State shall review the need to keep it.
  • Biometric data : under the proposed Regulation, SIS shall permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned.
  • Parliament has specified that any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data shall: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued; (ii) be authorised by Union law; (iii) respect fundamental rights , including the best interests of the child; (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection .
  • It would also be possible to add a DNA profile to an alert in clearly defined cases where fingerprint data are not available. This DNA profile shall only be accessible to authorised users.
  • Access to the system : the proposed Regulation provides for enhanced access possibilities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.
  • The amendments adopted aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances under which access to SIS data is possible.
events/10/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
events/11/body
Old
EP/CSL
New
EP
events/11/date
Old
2018-11-19T00:00:00
New
2018-10-24T00:00:00
events/11/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0413_EN.html title: T8-0413/2018
events/11/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 555 votes to 67, with 20 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.
  • The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
  • Purpose : the proposed Regulation seeks to introduce a series of improvements to SIS which shall increase its effectiveness, strengthen data protection and extend access rights. It establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
  • Technical architecture : SIS includes a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. The national systems may contain a complete or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States . The availability of SIS shall be subject to close monitoring at central and Member State level and any incident of unavailability for end-users shall be registered and reported to stakeholders at national and Union level. Each Member State shall set up a backup for its national system.
  • The European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ( eu-LISA ) shall implement technical solutions to reinforce the uninterrupted availability of SIS.
  • Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.
  • Each SIRENE Bureau shall, in accordance with national law, have easy direct or indirect access to all relevant national information, including national databases and all information on its Member States’ alerts, and to expert advice, in order to be able to react to requests for supplementary information swiftly and within the deadlines. Member States shall ensure that end-users and the staff of the SIRENE Bureaux regularly receive training , including on data security, data protection and data quality.
  • Data security : Parliament specified that national plans for security , business continuity and disaster recovery shall ensure that: (i) unauthorised processing of data in the SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in the SIS is prevented; (ii) systems installed in the event of an interruption are restored ; (iii) the SIS correctly performs its functions, that faults are reported and personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.
  • Where a Member State cooperates with external contractors in any SIS-related tasks, it shall closely monitor the activities of the contractor to ensure compliance with all provisions of this Regulation, in particular on security, confidentiality and data protection.
  • Categories of data : the amended text provides for the introduction of new categories of data in the SIS to enable end-users to make informed decisions based on an alert without losing time.
  • In order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert shall, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. Where available, all the relevant data, in particular the forename of the individual concerned , shall be inserted when creating an alert.
  • Alerts : alerts on the following categories of persons shall be entered in SIS at the request of the competent authority of the issuing Member State:
  • missing persons who need to be placed under protection for their own protection and in order to prevent a threat to public order or public security; children at risk of abduction by a parent, a family member or a guardian, who need to be prevented from travelling; children who need to be prevented from travelling owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and (i) becoming victims of trafficking in human beings, or of forced marriage, female genital mutilation or other forms of gender-based violence; (ii) becoming victims of or involved in terrorist offences; or (iii) becoming conscripted or enlisted into armed groups; vulnerable persons who are of age and who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and becoming victims of trafficking in human beings or gender-based violence.
  • Actions and decisions by the competent authorities, including judicial authorities, following an alert on a child should be taken in cooperation with child protection authorities. The national hotline for missing children should be informed, where appropriate.
  • Within three years of entering an alert in the SIS, the issuing Member State shall review the need to keep it.
  • Biometric data : under the proposed Regulation, SIS shall permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned.
  • Parliament has specified that any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data shall: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued; (ii) be authorised by Union law; (iii) respect fundamental rights , including the best interests of the child; (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection .
  • It would also be possible to add a DNA profile to an alert in clearly defined cases where fingerprint data are not available. This DNA profile shall only be accessible to authorised users.
  • Access to the system : the proposed Regulation provides for enhanced access possibilities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.
  • The amendments adopted aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances under which access to SIS data is possible.
events/11/type
Old
Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
events/13/body
Old
CSL
New
EP/CSL
events/13/date
Old
2018-11-28T00:00:00
New
2018-11-19T00:00:00
events/13/type
Old
Final act signed
New
Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
events/14/body
Old
EP
New
CSL
events/14/type
Old
End of procedure in Parliament
New
Final act signed
events/15/body
EP
events/15/date
Old
2018-12-07T00:00:00
New
2018-11-28T00:00:00
events/15/docs
  • title: Regulation 2018/1862 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32018R1862
  • title: OJ L 312 07.12.2018, p. 0056 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2018:312:TOC
events/15/summary
  • PURPOSE: to improve the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters with a view to making it more efficient, strengthening data protection and extending access rights.
  • LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending and repealing Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.
  • CONTENT: the Schengen Information System (SIS) constitutes an essential tool for the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union. This Regulation:
  • - establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters;
  • - lays down provisions on the technical architecture of SIS, on the responsibilities of the Member States and of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA), on data processing, on the rights of the persons concerned and on liability.
  • The Regulation is accompanied by two other regulations on the use of SIS: (i) in the field of border checks ; (ii) for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals.
  • Architecture
  • SIS comprises a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. National systems may contain a full or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States. The Central SIS and the communication infrastructure will have to be managed so as to ensure their functioning 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. For this reason, the agency "eu-LISA" will implement technical solutions to reinforce the continuous availability of SIS.
  • New category of alerts
  • The following are introduced into the system:
  • - alerts issued for the purpose of inquiry checks, an intermediary step between discreet checks and specific checks, which allow for individuals to be interviewed.
  • - alerts on unknown suspects or wanted persons, which provide for the introduction into the SIS of fingerprints or palm prints discovered at the scenes of serious crimes or terrorist incidents and which are considered to belong to a perpetrator.
  • - alerts of children at risk of parental abduction, and alerts on children and vulnerable adults who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection (e.g. when travel may lead to a risk of forced marriage, female genital mutilation, trafficking in human beings).
  • In the case of children, these alerts and the corresponding procedures should serve the best interests of the child. Such decisions shall be made immediately and not later than 12 hours after the child was located, in consultation with relevant child protection authorities, as appropriate.
  • The Regulation also permits the introduction of alerts concerning objects for seizure or as evidence in criminal proceedings, such as forged documents and high value objects, as well as computer equipment.
  • New categories of data
  • New data categories are introduced in SIS to allow end-users to take informed decisions based upon an alert without losing time. Therefore, in order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert should, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. If available, all relevant data, in particular the first name of the person concerned, must be inserted when creating an alert.
  • Biometric data
  • SIS will permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned. Any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data should: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued, (ii) be authorised by Union law, (iii) respect fundamental rights, including the best interests of the child, and (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection.
  • In order to avoid inconveniences caused by misidentification, SIS should also allow for the processing of data concerning individuals whose identity has been misused, subject to suitable safeguards, to obtaining the consent of the individual concerned for each data category, in particular palm prints, and to a strict limitation of the purposes for which such personal data can be lawfully processed.
  • Access to data
  • Europol will have access to all categories of data contained in the SIS and may exchange additional information with the SIRENE Bureaux of the Member States. In addition, Member States must inform Europol of any positive response when a person is wanted in connection with a terrorist offense. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency will also have access to the different categories of alerts in the SIS.
  • ENTRY INTO FORCE: 27.12.2018.
  • By 28.12.2021, the Commission will adopt a decision setting the date on which the SIS is put into service under the Regulation after verifying that the relevant conditions are fulfilled.
events/15/type
Old
Final act published in Official Journal
New
End of procedure in Parliament
events/16
date
2018-12-07T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
summary
docs
links/Research document/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2017)599343
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2017)599343
committees/0/shadows/3
name
VERGIAT Marie-Christine
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0
date
2016-12-21T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/0
date
2017-05-03T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EDPS
docs/1
date
2017-06-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.235 title: PE606.235
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
2017-05-03T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EDPS
docs/2
date
2017-06-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.235 title: PE606.235
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/2
date
2017-09-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE609.654 title: PE609.654
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.235
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-606235_EN.html
docs/3
date
2017-09-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE609.654 title: PE609.654
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3
date
2017-09-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE610.562 title: PE610.562
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE609.654
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-609654_EN.html
docs/4
date
2017-09-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE610.562 title: PE610.562
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/4
date
2018-11-21T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2018)755
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE610.562
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-610562_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30406&j=0&l=en
docs/5
date
2018-11-21T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2018)755
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/7
date
2020-02-28T00:00:00
docs
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/8
date
2021-06-29T00:00:00
docs
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/0/body
Old
EC
New
EP
events/0/date
Old
2016-12-21T00:00:00
New
2017-04-06T00:00:00
events/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0883/COM_COM(2016)0883_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0883
  • url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0883 title: EUR-Lex
events/0/summary
  • PURPOSE: to reform the Schengen Information System (SIS) in order to enhance the general provisions regarding police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 , Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU .
  • PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
  • BACKGROUND: in 2016, the Commission carried out a comprehensive evaluation of SIS , three years after the entry into operation of its second generation. This evaluation showed that SIS has been a genuine operational success.
  • Nonetheless, the effectiveness and efficiency of the system should be further strengthened. To this end, the Commission is presenting a first set of three proposals to improve and extend the use of SIS as result of the evaluation while continuing its work to make existing and future law enforcement and border management systems more interoperable.
  • These proposals cover the use of the system for:
  • border management , police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters , and the return of illegally staying third country nationals .
  • CONTENT: the present proposal and the supplementary proposal on border management lay down rules covering the comprehensive end-to-end use of SIS, including the Central SIS managed by eu-LISA Agency, but also the needs of the end-user.
  • End-to-end use of SIS : with over 2 million end-users in the competent authorities across Europe, SIS is an extremely widely used and effective tool for information exchange. This proposal as well as the parallel proposal on border management include rules covering the complete end-to-end operation of the system, including Central SIS operated by eu-LISA, the national systems and the end-user applications. It addresses not only the central and national systems themselves, but also the end-users' technical and operational needs.
  • In order to use SIS to its full effectiveness Member States should ensure that each time their end-users are entitled to carry out a search in a national police or immigration database, they also search SIS in parallel. This way SIS can fulfil its objective as the main compensatory measure in the area without internal border controls and Member States can better address the cross-border dimension of criminality and the mobility of criminals.
  • Data quality : the proposal maintains the principle that the Member State, which is the data owner, is also responsible for the accuracy of the data entered in SIS. It is, however, necessary to provide for a central mechanism managed by eu-LISA which allows Member States to regularly review those alerts in which the mandatory data fields may raise quality concerns.
  • The proposal empowers eu-LISA to produce data quality reports to Member States at regular intervals.
  • Photographs, facial images, dactylographic data and DNA profiles : the possibility to search with fingerprints with a view to identify a person is already set out in existing Regulation. Two new proposals make this search mandatory if the identity of the person cannot be ascertained in any other way.
  • Currently, facial images can only be used to confirm a person's identity following an alphanumeric search, rather than as the basis for a search. Furthermore, changes make provision for facial images, photographs and palm prints to be used to search the system and identify people, when this becomes technically possible. Dactylography refers to the scientific study of fingerprints as a method of identification. Palm prints can be used to establish a person's identity in the same way that fingerprints can be used.
  • In cases where fingerprints or palm prints are not available, the proposal allows for the use of DNA profiles for missing persons who need to be placed under protection, especially children. This functionality will be used only in the absence of fingerprints and will be accessible only to authorised users.
  • The proposed changes will also allow SIS alerts to be issued for unknown persons wanted in connection with a crime, based on fingerprints or palm prints. This new alert category complements the Prüm provisions that enable interconnectivity of national criminal fingerprint identification systems. Via the Prüm mechanism, a Member State can launch a request to ascertain if the perpetrator of a crime whose fingerprints have been found is known in any other Member State (usually for investigative purposes). A person can be identified via the Prüm mechanism only if he or she has been fingerprinted in another Member State for criminal purposes. Hence, first time offenders cannot be identified.
  • Under this proposal, the storage of fingerprints of unknown wanted persons , will enable the fingerprints of an unknown perpetrator to be uploaded into SIS so that he or she can be identified as wanted if encountered in another Member State.
  • It should be noted that the use of this functionality presupposes that the Member States conducted a prior consultation of all available national and international sources but could not ascertain the identity of the person concerned.
  • Access to SIS by immigration authorities – institutional users : users such as Europol, Eurojust and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall have access to SIS and SIS data that they need. Appropriate safeguards are put in place to ensure that the data in the system is properly protected requiring that these bodies may only access the data they need to carry out their tasks.
  • Provisions are also laid down enabling immigration authorities to access SIS.
  • Suspension of certain alerts : the proposal provides for Member States to temporarily suspend alerts for arrest (in case of an ongoing police operation or investigation), making them visible only to SIRENE Bureaux but not to the officers on the ground for a limited period of time. This provision helps to avoid that a confidential police operation to arrest a highly wanted offender is jeopardised by a police officer who is not involved in the matter.
  • Provisions are laid down for alerts on missing persons. Changes to these allow preventive alerts to be issued in cases where parental abduction is deemed a high risk, and provide for more finely tuned categorisation of missing persons alerts. These changes will mean that, where there is a high risk of imminent parental abduction, border guards and law enforcement officials are made aware of the risk and will be able to examine more closely the circumstances where an at-risk child is travelling, taking the child into protective custody if required. This alert will require an appropriate decision of the judicial authorities granting custody only to one of the parents.
  • Inquiry check : the proposal introduces a new form of check, the 'inquiry check'. This is, in particular, intended to support measures to counter terrorism and serious crime. It allows authorities to stop and question the person concerned. It is more in-depth than the existing discreet check, but does not involve searching the person and does not amount to arresting him or her. It may, however, provide sufficient information to decide on further action to be taken.
  • An expanded list of objects is set out for which alerts can be issued, adding falsified documents, falsified banknotes, IT equipment, component parts of vehicles, etc.
  • Data protection and security : the proposal clarifies responsibility for preventing, reporting and responding to incidents that might affect the security or integrity of SIS infrastructure, SIS data or supplementary information. It provides that the Commission remains responsible for the contractual management of the SIS communication infrastructure, including tasks which will be transferred to eu-LISA.
  • Categories of data and data processing : in order to provide more and more precise information to the end-users to facilitate and accelerate the required action as well as to allow the better identification of the alert subject, this proposal expands the types of information that can be held about people for whom an alert has been issued.
  • The proposal also expands the list of personal data that may be entered and processed in SIS for the purpose of dealing with misused identities as more data facilitates the victim and the perpetrator of misused identity . The extension of this provision entails no risk as all these data can only be entered upon the consent of the victim of misused identity.
  • This will now also include:
  • facial images; palm prints; details of identity documents; the victim's address; the names of the victim's father and mother.
  • The proposal sets out the rights for data subjects to access data, rectify inaccurate data and erase unlawfully stored data.
  • Lastly, provisions are laid down as regards statistics on the use of the SIS.
  • BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the estimated cost is EUR 64.3 million from 2018-2020.
events/0/type
Old
Legislative proposal published
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/1/body
Old
EP
New
CSL
events/1/date
Old
2017-04-06T00:00:00
New
2017-06-09T00:00:00
events/1/docs
  • url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 title: 3545
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in Council
events/2/body
Old
CSL
New
EP
events/2/date
Old
2017-06-09T00:00:00
New
2017-10-19T00:00:00
events/2/docs
  • url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 title: 3545
events/2/type
Old
Debate in Council
New
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
events/3/date
Old
2017-10-19T00:00:00
New
2017-11-06T00:00:00
events/3/type
Old
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/4/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
events/5/date
Old
2017-11-06T00:00:00
New
2017-11-10T00:00:00
events/5/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0349_EN.html title: A8-0349/2017
events/5/summary
  • The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Carlos COELHO (EPP, PT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU
  • The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
  • System architecture: the Commission’s proposal requires all Member States to have a national copy containing a complete or partial copy of the SIS database as well as a backup N.SIS. Given the risk to data security, Members believe that Member States should not be required to have a national copy in order to ensure the availability of the system. As an additional means of ensuring the uninterrupted availability of the SIS, Members proposed that a back-up communication infrastructure be developed and used in case of failure of the main communication infrastructure. In particular, the "CS-CIS" (containing the SIS database) or its backup version should contain an additional copy of the SIS database and be used simultaneously in active operation.
  • The CS-SIS and its back-up version should be installed at the technical sites of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of ​​freedom, security and justice (the "Eu-LISA agency").
  • Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.
  • The SIRENE Bureaux shall substantially reply to a request for supplementary information not later than six hours after the receipt of the request. In case of alerts for terrorist offences and in cases of alerts concerning, the SIRENE Bureaux shall act immediately.
  • To further increase the quality of data in SIS, the Agency should also offer training on the use of SIS to national training bodies and, insofar as possible, to SIRENE staff and to end-users.
  • Access to the system : the Commission proposal provides for increased access opportunities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The amendments introduced aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances in which it is possible to access the SIS data. It is also proposed to strengthen the safeguards in this respect, whether in terms of prior training or logging or oversight, indicating, in particular, the date and time of the data processing activity, the type of data processed and the name of the person responsible for data processing.
  • Europol should be immediately informed by Member States of all alerts created and positive replies to these alerts when a person or object is wanted by a Member State in relation to an offense referred to in Directive (EU) 2017/541 the fight against terrorism.
  • Data security : Members specified that each Member State shall, in relation to its N.SIS, adopt the necessary measures, including a security plan, a business continuity plan and a disaster recovery plan, that: (i) deny unauthorised persons access to data-processing equipment and facilities used for processing personal data; (ii) prevent the unauthorised processing of data in SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in SIS; (iii) ensure that the installed system may, in case of interruption, be restored; (iv) ensure that faults are reported and that personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.
  • In order to prevent the piracy of SIS by an external service provider, Members proposed that Member States cooperating with external contractors on any SIS-related tasks closely monitor contractors' activities to ensure compliance with all provisions of the Regulation, including in particular security, confidentiality and data protection.
  • Data protection : access to the system should be subject to all the legal provisions applicable to national data protection authorities and to the possibility for the supervisory authorities to verify the correct application of the legal provisions, in particular through the evaluation mechanism of Schengen introduced by Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 .
  • Members proposed a series of amendments that mainly aim to clarify what the applicable rules are. In addition, a number of provisions are strengthened and brought further in line with EU data protection framework, particularly Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • Data entered in the SIS should not reveal sensitive information about the person, such as ethnicity, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation.
  • Specific amendments regarding alerts : Members pointed out that an alert should be introduced when a suspect is wanted in connection with an alleged terrorist offense. They also delineated the use of DNA data and defined the circumstances in which they can accompany an alert.
  • Missing persons : the category of children at risk of being abducted, including by a family member, or of being removed from the Member State for the purpose of torture, sexual or gender-based violence or of being victims of activities listed in Directive (EU) 2017/541 should be introduced in the SIS.
  • An alert concerning a child at risk should be entered, following a decision of the competent judicial authority of the Member State that has jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility where a risk exists that the child may be unlawfully and imminently removed from the Member State where that competent judicial authority is situated.
  • In the case of children subject to alerts, the executing Member State shall consult without delay the issuing Member State including its child protection authorities in order to agree without delay and at the latest within 12 hours on the measures to be taken in order to safeguard the best interest of the child.
  • The data entered in SIS must indicate which category the missing child at risk falls into, these being: (i) runaways; (ii) unaccompanied children in the context of migration ; (iii) children abducted by a family member.
  • Investigative controls : due to their nature these should be mandatory, in full compliance with all procedural safeguards. Members have tightened up the information requirements that Member States are required to provide to enable the competent authorities of the executing Member State to take action.
  • This information should be transmitted immediately to the issuing authority when border checks or verification, police and customs checks or other enforcement actions are carried out within a Member State.
  • Entry into force of the new provisions : in order to avoid long delays, as was the case with the SIS II legal framework, Members proposed that the new legal framework be implemented one year after its entry into force.
events/5/type
Old
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
New
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
events/6/date
Old
2017-11-10T00:00:00
New
2017-11-13T00:00:00
events/6/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0349_EN.html title: A8-0349/2017
events/6/summary
  • The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Carlos COELHO (EPP, PT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU
  • The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
  • System architecture: the Commission’s proposal requires all Member States to have a national copy containing a complete or partial copy of the SIS database as well as a backup N.SIS. Given the risk to data security, Members believe that Member States should not be required to have a national copy in order to ensure the availability of the system. As an additional means of ensuring the uninterrupted availability of the SIS, Members proposed that a back-up communication infrastructure be developed and used in case of failure of the main communication infrastructure. In particular, the "CS-CIS" (containing the SIS database) or its backup version should contain an additional copy of the SIS database and be used simultaneously in active operation.
  • The CS-SIS and its back-up version should be installed at the technical sites of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of ​​freedom, security and justice (the "Eu-LISA agency").
  • Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.
  • The SIRENE Bureaux shall substantially reply to a request for supplementary information not later than six hours after the receipt of the request. In case of alerts for terrorist offences and in cases of alerts concerning, the SIRENE Bureaux shall act immediately.
  • To further increase the quality of data in SIS, the Agency should also offer training on the use of SIS to national training bodies and, insofar as possible, to SIRENE staff and to end-users.
  • Access to the system : the Commission proposal provides for increased access opportunities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The amendments introduced aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances in which it is possible to access the SIS data. It is also proposed to strengthen the safeguards in this respect, whether in terms of prior training or logging or oversight, indicating, in particular, the date and time of the data processing activity, the type of data processed and the name of the person responsible for data processing.
  • Europol should be immediately informed by Member States of all alerts created and positive replies to these alerts when a person or object is wanted by a Member State in relation to an offense referred to in Directive (EU) 2017/541 the fight against terrorism.
  • Data security : Members specified that each Member State shall, in relation to its N.SIS, adopt the necessary measures, including a security plan, a business continuity plan and a disaster recovery plan, that: (i) deny unauthorised persons access to data-processing equipment and facilities used for processing personal data; (ii) prevent the unauthorised processing of data in SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in SIS; (iii) ensure that the installed system may, in case of interruption, be restored; (iv) ensure that faults are reported and that personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.
  • In order to prevent the piracy of SIS by an external service provider, Members proposed that Member States cooperating with external contractors on any SIS-related tasks closely monitor contractors' activities to ensure compliance with all provisions of the Regulation, including in particular security, confidentiality and data protection.
  • Data protection : access to the system should be subject to all the legal provisions applicable to national data protection authorities and to the possibility for the supervisory authorities to verify the correct application of the legal provisions, in particular through the evaluation mechanism of Schengen introduced by Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 .
  • Members proposed a series of amendments that mainly aim to clarify what the applicable rules are. In addition, a number of provisions are strengthened and brought further in line with EU data protection framework, particularly Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • Data entered in the SIS should not reveal sensitive information about the person, such as ethnicity, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation.
  • Specific amendments regarding alerts : Members pointed out that an alert should be introduced when a suspect is wanted in connection with an alleged terrorist offense. They also delineated the use of DNA data and defined the circumstances in which they can accompany an alert.
  • Missing persons : the category of children at risk of being abducted, including by a family member, or of being removed from the Member State for the purpose of torture, sexual or gender-based violence or of being victims of activities listed in Directive (EU) 2017/541 should be introduced in the SIS.
  • An alert concerning a child at risk should be entered, following a decision of the competent judicial authority of the Member State that has jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility where a risk exists that the child may be unlawfully and imminently removed from the Member State where that competent judicial authority is situated.
  • In the case of children subject to alerts, the executing Member State shall consult without delay the issuing Member State including its child protection authorities in order to agree without delay and at the latest within 12 hours on the measures to be taken in order to safeguard the best interest of the child.
  • The data entered in SIS must indicate which category the missing child at risk falls into, these being: (i) runaways; (ii) unaccompanied children in the context of migration ; (iii) children abducted by a family member.
  • Investigative controls : due to their nature these should be mandatory, in full compliance with all procedural safeguards. Members have tightened up the information requirements that Member States are required to provide to enable the competent authorities of the executing Member State to take action.
  • This information should be transmitted immediately to the issuing authority when border checks or verification, police and customs checks or other enforcement actions are carried out within a Member State.
  • Entry into force of the new provisions : in order to avoid long delays, as was the case with the SIS II legal framework, Members proposed that the new legal framework be implemented one year after its entry into force.
events/6/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
events/7/date
Old
2018-10-23T00:00:00
New
2017-11-15T00:00:00
events/7/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181023&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/7/type
Old
Debate in Parliament
New
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71)
events/8/date
Old
2018-10-24T00:00:00
New
2018-10-23T00:00:00
events/8/docs/0
url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-10-23-TOC_EN.html
title
Debate in Parliament
events/8/docs/0
url
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30406&l=en
title
Results of vote in Parliament
events/8/type
Old
Results of vote in Parliament
New
Debate in Parliament
events/9/docs/0
url
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30406&l=en
title
Results of vote in Parliament
events/9/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0413_EN.html
title
T8-0413/2018
events/9/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 555 votes to 67, with 20 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.
  • The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
  • Purpose : the proposed Regulation seeks to introduce a series of improvements to SIS which shall increase its effectiveness, strengthen data protection and extend access rights. It establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
  • Technical architecture : SIS includes a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. The national systems may contain a complete or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States . The availability of SIS shall be subject to close monitoring at central and Member State level and any incident of unavailability for end-users shall be registered and reported to stakeholders at national and Union level. Each Member State shall set up a backup for its national system.
  • The European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ( eu-LISA ) shall implement technical solutions to reinforce the uninterrupted availability of SIS.
  • Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.
  • Each SIRENE Bureau shall, in accordance with national law, have easy direct or indirect access to all relevant national information, including national databases and all information on its Member States’ alerts, and to expert advice, in order to be able to react to requests for supplementary information swiftly and within the deadlines. Member States shall ensure that end-users and the staff of the SIRENE Bureaux regularly receive training , including on data security, data protection and data quality.
  • Data security : Parliament specified that national plans for security , business continuity and disaster recovery shall ensure that: (i) unauthorised processing of data in the SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in the SIS is prevented; (ii) systems installed in the event of an interruption are restored ; (iii) the SIS correctly performs its functions, that faults are reported and personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.
  • Where a Member State cooperates with external contractors in any SIS-related tasks, it shall closely monitor the activities of the contractor to ensure compliance with all provisions of this Regulation, in particular on security, confidentiality and data protection.
  • Categories of data : the amended text provides for the introduction of new categories of data in the SIS to enable end-users to make informed decisions based on an alert without losing time.
  • In order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert shall, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. Where available, all the relevant data, in particular the forename of the individual concerned , shall be inserted when creating an alert.
  • Alerts : alerts on the following categories of persons shall be entered in SIS at the request of the competent authority of the issuing Member State:
  • missing persons who need to be placed under protection for their own protection and in order to prevent a threat to public order or public security; children at risk of abduction by a parent, a family member or a guardian, who need to be prevented from travelling; children who need to be prevented from travelling owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and (i) becoming victims of trafficking in human beings, or of forced marriage, female genital mutilation or other forms of gender-based violence; (ii) becoming victims of or involved in terrorist offences; or (iii) becoming conscripted or enlisted into armed groups; vulnerable persons who are of age and who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and becoming victims of trafficking in human beings or gender-based violence.
  • Actions and decisions by the competent authorities, including judicial authorities, following an alert on a child should be taken in cooperation with child protection authorities. The national hotline for missing children should be informed, where appropriate.
  • Within three years of entering an alert in the SIS, the issuing Member State shall review the need to keep it.
  • Biometric data : under the proposed Regulation, SIS shall permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned.
  • Parliament has specified that any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data shall: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued; (ii) be authorised by Union law; (iii) respect fundamental rights , including the best interests of the child; (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection .
  • It would also be possible to add a DNA profile to an alert in clearly defined cases where fingerprint data are not available. This DNA profile shall only be accessible to authorised users.
  • Access to the system : the proposed Regulation provides for enhanced access possibilities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.
  • The amendments adopted aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances under which access to SIS data is possible.
events/9/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
events/10/body
Old
EP/CSL
New
EP
events/10/date
Old
2018-11-19T00:00:00
New
2018-10-24T00:00:00
events/10/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0413_EN.html title: T8-0413/2018
events/10/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 555 votes to 67, with 20 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.
  • The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
  • Purpose : the proposed Regulation seeks to introduce a series of improvements to SIS which shall increase its effectiveness, strengthen data protection and extend access rights. It establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
  • Technical architecture : SIS includes a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. The national systems may contain a complete or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States . The availability of SIS shall be subject to close monitoring at central and Member State level and any incident of unavailability for end-users shall be registered and reported to stakeholders at national and Union level. Each Member State shall set up a backup for its national system.
  • The European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ( eu-LISA ) shall implement technical solutions to reinforce the uninterrupted availability of SIS.
  • Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts.
  • Each SIRENE Bureau shall, in accordance with national law, have easy direct or indirect access to all relevant national information, including national databases and all information on its Member States’ alerts, and to expert advice, in order to be able to react to requests for supplementary information swiftly and within the deadlines. Member States shall ensure that end-users and the staff of the SIRENE Bureaux regularly receive training , including on data security, data protection and data quality.
  • Data security : Parliament specified that national plans for security , business continuity and disaster recovery shall ensure that: (i) unauthorised processing of data in the SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in the SIS is prevented; (ii) systems installed in the event of an interruption are restored ; (iii) the SIS correctly performs its functions, that faults are reported and personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning.
  • Where a Member State cooperates with external contractors in any SIS-related tasks, it shall closely monitor the activities of the contractor to ensure compliance with all provisions of this Regulation, in particular on security, confidentiality and data protection.
  • Categories of data : the amended text provides for the introduction of new categories of data in the SIS to enable end-users to make informed decisions based on an alert without losing time.
  • In order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert shall, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. Where available, all the relevant data, in particular the forename of the individual concerned , shall be inserted when creating an alert.
  • Alerts : alerts on the following categories of persons shall be entered in SIS at the request of the competent authority of the issuing Member State:
  • missing persons who need to be placed under protection for their own protection and in order to prevent a threat to public order or public security; children at risk of abduction by a parent, a family member or a guardian, who need to be prevented from travelling; children who need to be prevented from travelling owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and (i) becoming victims of trafficking in human beings, or of forced marriage, female genital mutilation or other forms of gender-based violence; (ii) becoming victims of or involved in terrorist offences; or (iii) becoming conscripted or enlisted into armed groups; vulnerable persons who are of age and who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and becoming victims of trafficking in human beings or gender-based violence.
  • Actions and decisions by the competent authorities, including judicial authorities, following an alert on a child should be taken in cooperation with child protection authorities. The national hotline for missing children should be informed, where appropriate.
  • Within three years of entering an alert in the SIS, the issuing Member State shall review the need to keep it.
  • Biometric data : under the proposed Regulation, SIS shall permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned.
  • Parliament has specified that any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data shall: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued; (ii) be authorised by Union law; (iii) respect fundamental rights , including the best interests of the child; (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection .
  • It would also be possible to add a DNA profile to an alert in clearly defined cases where fingerprint data are not available. This DNA profile shall only be accessible to authorised users.
  • Access to the system : the proposed Regulation provides for enhanced access possibilities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.
  • The amendments adopted aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances under which access to SIS data is possible.
events/10/type
Old
Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
events/12/body
Old
CSL
New
EP/CSL
events/12/date
Old
2018-11-28T00:00:00
New
2018-11-19T00:00:00
events/12/type
Old
Final act signed
New
Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
events/13/body
Old
EP
New
CSL
events/13/type
Old
End of procedure in Parliament
New
Final act signed
events/14/body
EP
events/14/date
Old
2018-12-07T00:00:00
New
2018-11-28T00:00:00
events/14/docs
  • title: Regulation 2018/1862 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32018R1862
  • title: OJ L 312 07.12.2018, p. 0056 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2018:312:TOC
events/14/summary
  • PURPOSE: to improve the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters with a view to making it more efficient, strengthening data protection and extending access rights.
  • LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending and repealing Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.
  • CONTENT: the Schengen Information System (SIS) constitutes an essential tool for the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union. This Regulation:
  • - establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters;
  • - lays down provisions on the technical architecture of SIS, on the responsibilities of the Member States and of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA), on data processing, on the rights of the persons concerned and on liability.
  • The Regulation is accompanied by two other regulations on the use of SIS: (i) in the field of border checks ; (ii) for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals.
  • Architecture
  • SIS comprises a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. National systems may contain a full or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States. The Central SIS and the communication infrastructure will have to be managed so as to ensure their functioning 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. For this reason, the agency "eu-LISA" will implement technical solutions to reinforce the continuous availability of SIS.
  • New category of alerts
  • The following are introduced into the system:
  • - alerts issued for the purpose of inquiry checks, an intermediary step between discreet checks and specific checks, which allow for individuals to be interviewed.
  • - alerts on unknown suspects or wanted persons, which provide for the introduction into the SIS of fingerprints or palm prints discovered at the scenes of serious crimes or terrorist incidents and which are considered to belong to a perpetrator.
  • - alerts of children at risk of parental abduction, and alerts on children and vulnerable adults who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection (e.g. when travel may lead to a risk of forced marriage, female genital mutilation, trafficking in human beings).
  • In the case of children, these alerts and the corresponding procedures should serve the best interests of the child. Such decisions shall be made immediately and not later than 12 hours after the child was located, in consultation with relevant child protection authorities, as appropriate.
  • The Regulation also permits the introduction of alerts concerning objects for seizure or as evidence in criminal proceedings, such as forged documents and high value objects, as well as computer equipment.
  • New categories of data
  • New data categories are introduced in SIS to allow end-users to take informed decisions based upon an alert without losing time. Therefore, in order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert should, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. If available, all relevant data, in particular the first name of the person concerned, must be inserted when creating an alert.
  • Biometric data
  • SIS will permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned. Any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data should: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued, (ii) be authorised by Union law, (iii) respect fundamental rights, including the best interests of the child, and (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection.
  • In order to avoid inconveniences caused by misidentification, SIS should also allow for the processing of data concerning individuals whose identity has been misused, subject to suitable safeguards, to obtaining the consent of the individual concerned for each data category, in particular palm prints, and to a strict limitation of the purposes for which such personal data can be lawfully processed.
  • Access to data
  • Europol will have access to all categories of data contained in the SIS and may exchange additional information with the SIRENE Bureaux of the Member States. In addition, Member States must inform Europol of any positive response when a person is wanted in connection with a terrorist offense. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency will also have access to the different categories of alerts in the SIS.
  • ENTRY INTO FORCE: 27.12.2018.
  • By 28.12.2021, the Commission will adopt a decision setting the date on which the SIS is put into service under the Regulation after verifying that the relevant conditions are fulfilled.
events/14/type
Old
Final act published in Official Journal
New
End of procedure in Parliament
events/15
date
2018-12-07T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
summary
docs
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title
Old
Joint Declaration 2018
New
Joint Declaration 2018-19
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Notes
  • 15/11/2017: Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 69c)
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/instrument/1
Repealing Decision 2007/533/JHA 2005/0103(CNS) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 2005/0104(COD) See also 2016/0408(COD) Amended by 2018/0152B(COD) Amended by 2019/0001A(COD) Amended by 2019/0001B(COD)
procedure/instrument/1
Repealing Decision 2007/533/JHA 2005/0103(CNS) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 2005/0104(COD) See also 2016/0408(COD) Amended by 2019/0001(COD)
docs/4/body
EC
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0349&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0349_EN.html
events/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0413
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0413_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: COELHO Carlos date: 2017-03-09T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2017-03-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: COELHO Carlos group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
activities
  • date: 2016-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0883/COM_COM(2016)0883_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0883 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52016PC0883:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en title: Migration and Home Affairs Commissioner: AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2017-04-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: DALLI Miriam group: ECR name: HALLA-AHO Jussi group: ALDE name: DEPREZ Gérard group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine group: Verts/ALE name: JOLY Eva group: EFD name: VON STORCH Beatrix group: ENF name: FONTANA Lorenzo responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2017-03-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: COELHO Carlos body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3545 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 type: Debate in Council title: 3545 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2017-06-09T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2017-10-19T00:00:00 body: unknown type: Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
  • date: 2017-11-06T00:00:00 body: unknown type: Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
  • date: 2017-11-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: DALLI Miriam group: ECR name: HALLA-AHO Jussi group: ALDE name: DEPREZ Gérard group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine group: Verts/ALE name: JOLY Eva group: EFD name: VON STORCH Beatrix group: ENF name: FONTANA Lorenzo responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2017-03-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: COELHO Carlos body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2017-11-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0349&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A8-0349/2017 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: DALLI Miriam group: ECR name: HALLA-AHO Jussi group: ALDE name: DEPREZ Gérard group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine group: Verts/ALE name: JOLY Eva group: EFD name: VON STORCH Beatrix group: ENF name: FONTANA Lorenzo responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2017-03-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: COELHO Carlos body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Migration and Home Affairs commissioner: AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2017-03-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: COELHO Carlos group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2017-03-09T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: COELHO Carlos
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 3651 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3651*&MEET_DATE=19/11/2018 date: 2018-11-19T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 3545 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 date: 2017-06-09T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2017-05-03T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2017:200:TOC title: OJ C 200 23.06.2017, p. 0014 title: N8-0046/2017 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EDPS
  • date: 2017-06-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.235 title: PE606.235 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2017-09-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE609.654 title: PE609.654 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-09-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE610.562 title: PE610.562 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=30406&j=0&l=en title: SP(2018)755 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2018-11-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 00036/2018/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
  • date: 2017-05-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
  • date: 2017-06-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883 type: Contribution body: IT_SENATE
  • date: 2017-06-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883 type: Contribution body: CZ_SENATE
  • date: 2017-08-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883 type: Contribution body: IT_CHAMBER
  • date: 2017-05-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0883 title: COM(2016)0883 type: Contribution body: ES_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2016-12-21T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0883/COM_COM(2016)0883_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0883 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0883 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to reform the Schengen Information System (SIS) in order to enhance the general provisions regarding police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 , Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU . PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: in 2016, the Commission carried out a comprehensive evaluation of SIS , three years after the entry into operation of its second generation. This evaluation showed that SIS has been a genuine operational success. Nonetheless, the effectiveness and efficiency of the system should be further strengthened. To this end, the Commission is presenting a first set of three proposals to improve and extend the use of SIS as result of the evaluation while continuing its work to make existing and future law enforcement and border management systems more interoperable. These proposals cover the use of the system for: border management , police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters , and the return of illegally staying third country nationals . CONTENT: the present proposal and the supplementary proposal on border management lay down rules covering the comprehensive end-to-end use of SIS, including the Central SIS managed by eu-LISA Agency, but also the needs of the end-user. End-to-end use of SIS : with over 2 million end-users in the competent authorities across Europe, SIS is an extremely widely used and effective tool for information exchange. This proposal as well as the parallel proposal on border management include rules covering the complete end-to-end operation of the system, including Central SIS operated by eu-LISA, the national systems and the end-user applications. It addresses not only the central and national systems themselves, but also the end-users' technical and operational needs. In order to use SIS to its full effectiveness Member States should ensure that each time their end-users are entitled to carry out a search in a national police or immigration database, they also search SIS in parallel. This way SIS can fulfil its objective as the main compensatory measure in the area without internal border controls and Member States can better address the cross-border dimension of criminality and the mobility of criminals. Data quality : the proposal maintains the principle that the Member State, which is the data owner, is also responsible for the accuracy of the data entered in SIS. It is, however, necessary to provide for a central mechanism managed by eu-LISA which allows Member States to regularly review those alerts in which the mandatory data fields may raise quality concerns. The proposal empowers eu-LISA to produce data quality reports to Member States at regular intervals. Photographs, facial images, dactylographic data and DNA profiles : the possibility to search with fingerprints with a view to identify a person is already set out in existing Regulation. Two new proposals make this search mandatory if the identity of the person cannot be ascertained in any other way. Currently, facial images can only be used to confirm a person's identity following an alphanumeric search, rather than as the basis for a search. Furthermore, changes make provision for facial images, photographs and palm prints to be used to search the system and identify people, when this becomes technically possible. Dactylography refers to the scientific study of fingerprints as a method of identification. Palm prints can be used to establish a person's identity in the same way that fingerprints can be used. In cases where fingerprints or palm prints are not available, the proposal allows for the use of DNA profiles for missing persons who need to be placed under protection, especially children. This functionality will be used only in the absence of fingerprints and will be accessible only to authorised users. The proposed changes will also allow SIS alerts to be issued for unknown persons wanted in connection with a crime, based on fingerprints or palm prints. This new alert category complements the Prüm provisions that enable interconnectivity of national criminal fingerprint identification systems. Via the Prüm mechanism, a Member State can launch a request to ascertain if the perpetrator of a crime whose fingerprints have been found is known in any other Member State (usually for investigative purposes). A person can be identified via the Prüm mechanism only if he or she has been fingerprinted in another Member State for criminal purposes. Hence, first time offenders cannot be identified. Under this proposal, the storage of fingerprints of unknown wanted persons , will enable the fingerprints of an unknown perpetrator to be uploaded into SIS so that he or she can be identified as wanted if encountered in another Member State. It should be noted that the use of this functionality presupposes that the Member States conducted a prior consultation of all available national and international sources but could not ascertain the identity of the person concerned. Access to SIS by immigration authorities – institutional users : users such as Europol, Eurojust and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall have access to SIS and SIS data that they need. Appropriate safeguards are put in place to ensure that the data in the system is properly protected requiring that these bodies may only access the data they need to carry out their tasks. Provisions are also laid down enabling immigration authorities to access SIS. Suspension of certain alerts : the proposal provides for Member States to temporarily suspend alerts for arrest (in case of an ongoing police operation or investigation), making them visible only to SIRENE Bureaux but not to the officers on the ground for a limited period of time. This provision helps to avoid that a confidential police operation to arrest a highly wanted offender is jeopardised by a police officer who is not involved in the matter. Provisions are laid down for alerts on missing persons. Changes to these allow preventive alerts to be issued in cases where parental abduction is deemed a high risk, and provide for more finely tuned categorisation of missing persons alerts. These changes will mean that, where there is a high risk of imminent parental abduction, border guards and law enforcement officials are made aware of the risk and will be able to examine more closely the circumstances where an at-risk child is travelling, taking the child into protective custody if required. This alert will require an appropriate decision of the judicial authorities granting custody only to one of the parents. Inquiry check : the proposal introduces a new form of check, the 'inquiry check'. This is, in particular, intended to support measures to counter terrorism and serious crime. It allows authorities to stop and question the person concerned. It is more in-depth than the existing discreet check, but does not involve searching the person and does not amount to arresting him or her. It may, however, provide sufficient information to decide on further action to be taken. An expanded list of objects is set out for which alerts can be issued, adding falsified documents, falsified banknotes, IT equipment, component parts of vehicles, etc. Data protection and security : the proposal clarifies responsibility for preventing, reporting and responding to incidents that might affect the security or integrity of SIS infrastructure, SIS data or supplementary information. It provides that the Commission remains responsible for the contractual management of the SIS communication infrastructure, including tasks which will be transferred to eu-LISA. Categories of data and data processing : in order to provide more and more precise information to the end-users to facilitate and accelerate the required action as well as to allow the better identification of the alert subject, this proposal expands the types of information that can be held about people for whom an alert has been issued. The proposal also expands the list of personal data that may be entered and processed in SIS for the purpose of dealing with misused identities as more data facilitates the victim and the perpetrator of misused identity . The extension of this provision entails no risk as all these data can only be entered upon the consent of the victim of misused identity. This will now also include: facial images; palm prints; details of identity documents; the victim's address; the names of the victim's father and mother. The proposal sets out the rights for data subjects to access data, rectify inaccurate data and erase unlawfully stored data. Lastly, provisions are laid down as regards statistics on the use of the SIS. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the estimated cost is EUR 64.3 million from 2018-2020.
  • date: 2017-04-06T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-06-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 title: 3545
  • date: 2017-10-19T00:00:00 type: Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-11-06T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-11-06T00:00:00 type: Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-11-10T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0349&language=EN title: A8-0349/2017 summary: The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Carlos COELHO (EPP, PT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows: System architecture: the Commission’s proposal requires all Member States to have a national copy containing a complete or partial copy of the SIS database as well as a backup N.SIS. Given the risk to data security, Members believe that Member States should not be required to have a national copy in order to ensure the availability of the system. As an additional means of ensuring the uninterrupted availability of the SIS, Members proposed that a back-up communication infrastructure be developed and used in case of failure of the main communication infrastructure. In particular, the "CS-CIS" (containing the SIS database) or its backup version should contain an additional copy of the SIS database and be used simultaneously in active operation. The CS-SIS and its back-up version should be installed at the technical sites of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of ​​freedom, security and justice (the "Eu-LISA agency"). Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts. The SIRENE Bureaux shall substantially reply to a request for supplementary information not later than six hours after the receipt of the request. In case of alerts for terrorist offences and in cases of alerts concerning, the SIRENE Bureaux shall act immediately. To further increase the quality of data in SIS, the Agency should also offer training on the use of SIS to national training bodies and, insofar as possible, to SIRENE staff and to end-users. Access to the system : the Commission proposal provides for increased access opportunities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The amendments introduced aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances in which it is possible to access the SIS data. It is also proposed to strengthen the safeguards in this respect, whether in terms of prior training or logging or oversight, indicating, in particular, the date and time of the data processing activity, the type of data processed and the name of the person responsible for data processing. Europol should be immediately informed by Member States of all alerts created and positive replies to these alerts when a person or object is wanted by a Member State in relation to an offense referred to in Directive (EU) 2017/541 the fight against terrorism. Data security : Members specified that each Member State shall, in relation to its N.SIS, adopt the necessary measures, including a security plan, a business continuity plan and a disaster recovery plan, that: (i) deny unauthorised persons access to data-processing equipment and facilities used for processing personal data; (ii) prevent the unauthorised processing of data in SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in SIS; (iii) ensure that the installed system may, in case of interruption, be restored; (iv) ensure that faults are reported and that personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning. In order to prevent the piracy of SIS by an external service provider, Members proposed that Member States cooperating with external contractors on any SIS-related tasks closely monitor contractors' activities to ensure compliance with all provisions of the Regulation, including in particular security, confidentiality and data protection. Data protection : access to the system should be subject to all the legal provisions applicable to national data protection authorities and to the possibility for the supervisory authorities to verify the correct application of the legal provisions, in particular through the evaluation mechanism of Schengen introduced by Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 . Members proposed a series of amendments that mainly aim to clarify what the applicable rules are. In addition, a number of provisions are strengthened and brought further in line with EU data protection framework, particularly Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Data entered in the SIS should not reveal sensitive information about the person, such as ethnicity, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation. Specific amendments regarding alerts : Members pointed out that an alert should be introduced when a suspect is wanted in connection with an alleged terrorist offense. They also delineated the use of DNA data and defined the circumstances in which they can accompany an alert. Missing persons : the category of children at risk of being abducted, including by a family member, or of being removed from the Member State for the purpose of torture, sexual or gender-based violence or of being victims of activities listed in Directive (EU) 2017/541 should be introduced in the SIS. An alert concerning a child at risk should be entered, following a decision of the competent judicial authority of the Member State that has jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility where a risk exists that the child may be unlawfully and imminently removed from the Member State where that competent judicial authority is situated. In the case of children subject to alerts, the executing Member State shall consult without delay the issuing Member State including its child protection authorities in order to agree without delay and at the latest within 12 hours on the measures to be taken in order to safeguard the best interest of the child. The data entered in SIS must indicate which category the missing child at risk falls into, these being: (i) runaways; (ii) unaccompanied children in the context of migration ; (iii) children abducted by a family member. Investigative controls : due to their nature these should be mandatory, in full compliance with all procedural safeguards. Members have tightened up the information requirements that Member States are required to provide to enable the competent authorities of the executing Member State to take action. This information should be transmitted immediately to the issuing authority when border checks or verification, police and customs checks or other enforcement actions are carried out within a Member State. Entry into force of the new provisions : in order to avoid long delays, as was the case with the SIS II legal framework, Members proposed that the new legal framework be implemented one year after its entry into force.
  • date: 2018-10-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181023&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-10-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30406&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2018-10-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0413 title: T8-0413/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 555 votes to 67, with 20 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU. The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows: Purpose : the proposed Regulation seeks to introduce a series of improvements to SIS which shall increase its effectiveness, strengthen data protection and extend access rights. It establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. Technical architecture : SIS includes a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. The national systems may contain a complete or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States . The availability of SIS shall be subject to close monitoring at central and Member State level and any incident of unavailability for end-users shall be registered and reported to stakeholders at national and Union level. Each Member State shall set up a backup for its national system. The European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ( eu-LISA ) shall implement technical solutions to reinforce the uninterrupted availability of SIS. Member States’ responsibilities : each Member State shall designate a national authority which is operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and shall ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information (the SIRENE Bureau). The SIRENE Bureau shall serve as single contact point for Member States to exchange supplementary information regarding alerts. Each SIRENE Bureau shall, in accordance with national law, have easy direct or indirect access to all relevant national information, including national databases and all information on its Member States’ alerts, and to expert advice, in order to be able to react to requests for supplementary information swiftly and within the deadlines. Member States shall ensure that end-users and the staff of the SIRENE Bureaux regularly receive training , including on data security, data protection and data quality. Data security : Parliament specified that national plans for security , business continuity and disaster recovery shall ensure that: (i) unauthorised processing of data in the SIS and any unauthorised modification or erasure of data processed in the SIS is prevented; (ii) systems installed in the event of an interruption are restored ; (iii) the SIS correctly performs its functions, that faults are reported and personal data stored in SIS cannot be corrupted by means of the system malfunctioning. Where a Member State cooperates with external contractors in any SIS-related tasks, it shall closely monitor the activities of the contractor to ensure compliance with all provisions of this Regulation, in particular on security, confidentiality and data protection. Categories of data : the amended text provides for the introduction of new categories of data in the SIS to enable end-users to make informed decisions based on an alert without losing time. In order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert shall, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. Where available, all the relevant data, in particular the forename of the individual concerned , shall be inserted when creating an alert. Alerts : alerts on the following categories of persons shall be entered in SIS at the request of the competent authority of the issuing Member State: missing persons who need to be placed under protection for their own protection and in order to prevent a threat to public order or public security; children at risk of abduction by a parent, a family member or a guardian, who need to be prevented from travelling; children who need to be prevented from travelling owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and (i) becoming victims of trafficking in human beings, or of forced marriage, female genital mutilation or other forms of gender-based violence; (ii) becoming victims of or involved in terrorist offences; or (iii) becoming conscripted or enlisted into armed groups; vulnerable persons who are of age and who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection owing to a concrete and apparent risk of them being removed from or leaving the territory of a Member State and becoming victims of trafficking in human beings or gender-based violence. Actions and decisions by the competent authorities, including judicial authorities, following an alert on a child should be taken in cooperation with child protection authorities. The national hotline for missing children should be informed, where appropriate. Within three years of entering an alert in the SIS, the issuing Member State shall review the need to keep it. Biometric data : under the proposed Regulation, SIS shall permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned. Parliament has specified that any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data shall: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued; (ii) be authorised by Union law; (iii) respect fundamental rights , including the best interests of the child; (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection . It would also be possible to add a DNA profile to an alert in clearly defined cases where fingerprint data are not available. This DNA profile shall only be accessible to authorised users. Access to the system : the proposed Regulation provides for enhanced access possibilities for a range of European agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The amendments adopted aim to clarify, with regard to the existing mandates of the different agencies, the circumstances under which access to SIS data is possible.
  • date: 2018-11-19T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2018-11-19T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2018-11-28T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2018-11-28T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2018-12-07T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to improve the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters with a view to making it more efficient, strengthening data protection and extending access rights. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending and repealing Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU. CONTENT: the Schengen Information System (SIS) constitutes an essential tool for the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union. This Regulation: - establishes the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in SIS on persons and objects and for the exchange of supplementary information and additional data for the purpose of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters; - lays down provisions on the technical architecture of SIS, on the responsibilities of the Member States and of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA), on data processing, on the rights of the persons concerned and on liability. The Regulation is accompanied by two other regulations on the use of SIS: (i) in the field of border checks ; (ii) for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals. Architecture SIS comprises a central system (Central SIS) and national systems. National systems may contain a full or partial copy of the SIS database, which may be shared by two or more Member States. The Central SIS and the communication infrastructure will have to be managed so as to ensure their functioning 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. For this reason, the agency "eu-LISA" will implement technical solutions to reinforce the continuous availability of SIS. New category of alerts The following are introduced into the system: - alerts issued for the purpose of inquiry checks, an intermediary step between discreet checks and specific checks, which allow for individuals to be interviewed. - alerts on unknown suspects or wanted persons, which provide for the introduction into the SIS of fingerprints or palm prints discovered at the scenes of serious crimes or terrorist incidents and which are considered to belong to a perpetrator. - alerts of children at risk of parental abduction, and alerts on children and vulnerable adults who need to be prevented from travelling for their own protection (e.g. when travel may lead to a risk of forced marriage, female genital mutilation, trafficking in human beings). In the case of children, these alerts and the corresponding procedures should serve the best interests of the child. Such decisions shall be made immediately and not later than 12 hours after the child was located, in consultation with relevant child protection authorities, as appropriate. The Regulation also permits the introduction of alerts concerning objects for seizure or as evidence in criminal proceedings, such as forged documents and high value objects, as well as computer equipment. New categories of data New data categories are introduced in SIS to allow end-users to take informed decisions based upon an alert without losing time. Therefore, in order to facilitate identification and detect multiple identities, the alert should, where such information is available, include a reference to the personal identification document of the individual concerned or its number and a copy, if possible in colour, of the document. If available, all relevant data, in particular the first name of the person concerned, must be inserted when creating an alert. Biometric data SIS will permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned. Any entry of photographs, facial images or dactyloscopic data into SIS and any use of such data should: (i) be limited to what is necessary for the objectives pursued, (ii) be authorised by Union law, (iii) respect fundamental rights, including the best interests of the child, and (iv) be in accordance with Union law on data protection. In order to avoid inconveniences caused by misidentification, SIS should also allow for the processing of data concerning individuals whose identity has been misused, subject to suitable safeguards, to obtaining the consent of the individual concerned for each data category, in particular palm prints, and to a strict limitation of the purposes for which such personal data can be lawfully processed. Access to data Europol will have access to all categories of data contained in the SIS and may exchange additional information with the SIRENE Bureaux of the Member States. In addition, Member States must inform Europol of any positive response when a person is wanted in connection with a terrorist offense. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency will also have access to the different categories of alerts in the SIS. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 27.12.2018. By 28.12.2021, the Commission will adopt a decision setting the date on which the SIS is put into service under the Regulation after verifying that the relevant conditions are fulfilled. docs: title: Regulation 2018/1862 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32018R1862 title: OJ L 312 07.12.2018, p. 0056 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2018:312:TOC
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en title: Migration and Home Affairs commissioner: AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
procedure/Legislative priorities
  • title: Joint Declaration 2018 url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=2063000&l=en
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Notes
  • 15/11/2017: Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 69c)
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/8/08847
New
  • LIBE/8/08847
procedure/final
title
Regulation 2018/1862
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32018R1862
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Repealing Decision 2007/533/JHA 2005/0103(CNS) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 2005/0104(COD) See also 2016/0408(COD) Amended by 2019/0001(COD)
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.10.04 External borders crossing and controls, visas
  • 7.30.05 Police cooperation
  • 7.40.04 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
New
7.10.04
External borders crossing and controls, visas
7.30.05
Police cooperation
7.40.04
Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
procedure/summary
  • Amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014
  • Repealing Decision 2007/533/JHA
  • Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006
  • See also
activities/3
date
2017-10-19T00:00:00
body
unknown
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
activities/4
date
2017-11-06T00:00:00
body
unknown
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
activities/4
date
2017-11-10T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0349&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A8-0349/2017
body
EP
committees
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/3
date
2017-11-06T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
procedure/summary/3
See also
activities/2
body
CSL
meeting_id
3545
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 type: Debate in Council title: 3545
council
Transport, Telecommunications and Energy
date
2017-06-09T00:00:00
type
Council Meeting
activities/1
date
2017-04-06T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/8/08847
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
committees/3/shadows
  • group: S&D name: DALLI Miriam
  • group: ECR name: HALLA-AHO Jussi
  • group: ALDE name: DEPREZ Gérard
  • group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine
  • group: Verts/ALE name: JOLY Eva
  • group: EFD name: VON STORCH Beatrix
  • group: ENF name: FONTANA Lorenzo
committees/3/date
2017-03-09T00:00:00
committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: COELHO Carlos
links/Research document
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2017)599343
title
Briefing
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52016PC0883:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52016PC0883:EN
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to reform the Schengen Information System (SIS) in order to enhance the general provisions regarding police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.

    PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

    BACKGROUND: in 2016, the Commission carried out a comprehensive evaluation of SIS, three years after the entry into operation of its second generation. This evaluation showed that SIS has been a genuine operational success.

    Nonetheless, the effectiveness and efficiency of the system should be further strengthened. To this end, the Commission is presenting a first set of three proposals to improve and extend the use of SIS as result of the evaluation while continuing its work to make existing and future law enforcement and border management systems more interoperable.

    These proposals cover the use of the system for:

    CONTENT: the present proposal and the supplementary proposal on border management lay down rules covering the comprehensive end-to-end use of SIS, including the Central SIS managed by eu-LISA Agency, but also the needs of the end-user.

    End-to-end use of SIS: with over 2 million end-users in the competent authorities across Europe, SIS is an extremely widely used and effective tool for information exchange. This proposal as well as the parallel proposal on border management include rules covering the complete end-to-end operation of the system, including Central SIS operated by eu-LISA, the national systems and the end-user applications. It addresses not only the central and national systems themselves, but also the end-users' technical and operational needs.

    In order to use SIS to its full effectiveness Member States should ensure that each time their end-users are entitled to carry out a search in a national police or immigration database, they also search SIS in parallel. This way SIS can fulfil its objective as the main compensatory measure in the area without internal border controls and Member States can better address the cross-border dimension of criminality and the mobility of criminals.

    Data quality: the proposal maintains the principle that the Member State, which is the data owner, is also responsible for the accuracy of the data entered in SIS. It is, however, necessary to provide for a central mechanism managed by eu-LISA which allows Member States to regularly review those alerts in which the mandatory data fields may raise quality concerns.

    The proposal empowers eu-LISA to produce data quality reports to Member States at regular intervals.

    Photographs, facial images, dactylographic data and DNA profiles: the possibility to search with fingerprints with a view to identify a person is already set out in existing Regulation. Two new proposals make this search mandatory if the identity of the person cannot be ascertained in any other way.

    Currently, facial images can only be used to confirm a person's identity following an alphanumeric search, rather than as the basis for a search. Furthermore, changes make provision for facial images, photographs and palm prints to be used to search the system and identify people, when this becomes technically possible. Dactylography refers to the scientific study of fingerprints as a method of identification. Palm prints can be used to establish a person's identity in the same way that fingerprints can be used.

    In cases where fingerprints or palm prints are not available, the proposal allows for the use of DNA profiles for missing persons who need to be placed under protection, especially children. This functionality will be used only in the absence of fingerprints and will be accessible only to authorised users.

    The proposed changes will also allow SIS alerts to be issued for unknown persons wanted in connection with a crime, based on fingerprints or palm prints. This new alert category complements the Prüm provisions that enable interconnectivity of national criminal fingerprint identification systems. Via the Prüm mechanism, a Member State can launch a request to ascertain if the perpetrator of a crime whose fingerprints have been found is known in any other Member State (usually for investigative purposes). A person can be identified via the Prüm mechanism only if he or she has been fingerprinted in another Member State for criminal purposes. Hence, first time offenders cannot be identified.

    Under this proposal, the storage of fingerprints of unknown wanted persons, will enable the fingerprints of an unknown perpetrator to be uploaded into SIS so that he or she can be identified as wanted if encountered in another Member State.

    It should be noted that the use of this functionality presupposes that the Member States conducted a prior consultation of all available national and international sources but could not ascertain the identity of the person concerned.

    Access to SIS by immigration authorities – institutional users: users such as Europol, Eurojust and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall have access to SIS and SIS data that they need. Appropriate safeguards are put in place to ensure that the data in the system is properly protected requiring that these bodies may only access the data they need to carry out their tasks. 

    Provisions are also laid down enabling immigration authorities to access SIS.

    Suspension of certain alerts: the proposal provides for Member States to temporarily suspend alerts for arrest (in case of an ongoing police operation or investigation), making them visible only to SIRENE Bureaux but not to the officers on the ground for a limited period of time. This provision helps to avoid that a confidential police operation to arrest a highly wanted offender is jeopardised by a police officer who is not involved in the matter.

    Provisions are laid down for alerts on missing persons. Changes to these allow preventive alerts to be issued in cases where parental abduction is deemed a high risk, and provide for more finely tuned categorisation of missing persons alerts. These changes will mean that, where there is a high risk of imminent parental abduction, border guards and law enforcement officials are made aware of the risk and will be able to examine more closely the circumstances where an at-risk child is travelling, taking the child into protective custody if required. This alert will require an appropriate decision of the judicial authorities granting custody only to one of the parents.

    Inquiry check: the proposal introduces a new form of check, the 'inquiry check'. This is, in particular, intended to support measures to counter terrorism and serious crime. It allows authorities to stop and question the person concerned. It is more in-depth than the existing discreet check, but does not involve searching the person and does not amount to arresting him or her. It may, however, provide sufficient information to decide on further action to be taken.

    An expanded list of objects is set out for which alerts can be issued, adding falsified documents, falsified banknotes, IT equipment, component parts of vehicles, etc.

    Data protection and security: the proposal clarifies responsibility for preventing, reporting and responding to incidents that might affect the security or integrity of SIS infrastructure, SIS data or supplementary information. It provides that the Commission remains responsible for the contractual management of the SIS communication infrastructure, including tasks which will be transferred to eu-LISA.

    Categories of data and data processing: in order to provide more and more precise information to the end-users to facilitate and accelerate the required action as well as to allow the better identification of the alert subject, this proposal expands the types of information that can be held about people for whom an alert has been issued.

    The proposal also expands the list of personal data that may be entered and processed in SIS for the purpose of dealing with misused identities as more data facilitates the victim and the perpetrator of misused identity. The extension of this provision entails no risk as all these data can only be entered upon the consent of the victim of misused identity.

    This will now also include:

    • facial images;
    • palm prints;
    • details of identity documents;
    • the victim's address;
    • the names of the victim's father and mother.

    The proposal sets out the rights for data subjects to access data, rectify inaccurate data and erase unlawfully stored data.

    Lastly, provisions are laid down as regards statistics on the use of the SIS.

    BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the estimated cost is EUR 64.3 million from 2018-2020.

activities
  • date: 2016-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0883/COM_COM(2016)0883_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52016PC0883:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2016)0883 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission:
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2016/0409(COD)
    instrument
    Regulation
    legal_basis
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    summary
    subtype
    Legislation
    title
    Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters
    type
    COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
    subject