BETA


2016/2004(BUD) 2017 budget: guidelines, Section III - Commission

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG GEIER Jens (icon: S&D S&D) MUREŞAN Siegfried (icon: PPE PPE), KÖLMEL Bernd (icon: ECR ECR), DEPREZ Gérard (icon: ALDE ALDE), MARAGALL Ernest (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ZANNI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), ŻÓŁTEK Stanisław (icon: ENF ENF)
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2016/03/09
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/03/09
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 425 votes to 200, with 78 abstentions, a resolution on the general guidelines for the preparation of the 2017 budget, Section III – Commission.

Parliament stated that the 2017 budget should lay down the path towards economic growth and job creation. However, it is likely to be affected by the evolving migration and refugee crisis as well as coinciding with the mid-term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF).

Limited budget capacity : although the Union budget has proven to be a crucial resource in tackling recent crises and has responded to needs that had not been necessarily anticipated during the negotiation of the MFF 2014-2020, Parliament stressed that the limited capacity of the Union budget to tackle these crises is at this stage primarily the result of the use of all means available agreed on in the MFF negotiations, and particularly of the use of special instruments such as the flexibility instrument.

In this context, the Council is urged to reconsider its position on the question of budgeting the MFF special instruments so as to alleviate the constraints weighing on the Union budget. Parliament reiterated its view that the payment appropriations for the special instruments (the flexibility instrument, the EU Solidarity Fund, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the Emergency Aid Reserve) should be calculated over and above the MFF ceilings , as is the case for commitments.

Improved budgeting : Parliament strongly believes that boosting investment, including through a better coordinated increase in public and private investment with a focus on the Europe 2020 targets, is a proper policy response with a view to a more balanced economic policy. It believes that those two elements should be taken into consideration in the preparation of the draft budget for 2017 insofar as this should help identify priorities within an economic context.

It called, consequently, for more synergies between the Union dimension of the European Semester for economic policy coordination and the Union budget, which is also the cornerstone for a stable euro area.

Parliament regretted that the Union budget has in recent years been a collateral victim of Member States’ duplicitous behaviour , which has led them to consider their contribution to the Union budget as a burden and to treat it as an adjustment variable. For the Parliament, the EU budget is an investment budget which can bring particularly strong added value by boosting growth, competitiveness and job creation in the Member States. In this respect, it drew attention to the need for Member States’ contributions to the Union budget not to be treated as an adjustment variable subject to macroeconomic conditions. It reiterated the added value of the Union budget in terms of synergies and economies of scale; emphasises the special situation of isolated and peripheral regions.

In parallel, it regretted the fact that corporate tax avoidance has caused huge losses of tax income for Member States, and therefore a reduction in their contributions to the EU budget. Such unfair tax competition in some cases means GDP transfer from one Member State to another and GNI transfer to non-EU tax havens, thus reducing aggregate Member State contributions to the EU budget.

It underlined that the 2017 budget will be impacted by internal and external security challenges, which may also take the form of terrorist threats or extremism, and by the implementation of the shared agenda between the Union and the Member States aimed at securing an EU area of freedom, security and justice. In this regard, Parliament stressed the importance of the EU budgetary instruments, such as the Internal Security Fund (ISF), in order to address the most crucial challenges, including through the strengthening of preventive measures as well as cross-border operational cooperation.

Funding programmes : Parliament reiterated the commitment to reinforce Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility through the annual budgetary procedure and stressed the importance of Horizon 2020, COSME, programmes funding SMEs, Erasmus+, and programmes and policies that support the development of an innovation-friendly environment and contribute to the success of Europe 2020.

As regards the youth employment initiative (YEI), Parliament reiterated its commitment to continued funding for this programme with a view to scaling it up and thereby offering a greater number of young people, including young migrants entering the EU, the prospect of effectively entering the labour market by receiving a good quality offer of employment, continued education or apprenticeship. It regretted that during the negotiations on the EU budget for 2016 no new commitments were allocated to further finance the YEI, while youth unemployment remains at its highest rates in the EU.

A permanent solution for the funding of YEI through new commitment appropriations up to 2020 will be part of the mid-term revision of the MFF.

Migrant crisis : Parliament acknowledged that in spite of the mobilisation of significant budgetary means spread over 2015 and 2016 to address the migration and refugee crisis, a solution has still not been found , be it internally within the Union or externally in refugees’ countries of origin. It stressed, however, that the budgetary means are insufficient and that substantial additional financial means are required to address this crisis . According to members, longer-term solutions should be sought, not only in the annual budgetary procedure, but also in the upcoming interim revision of the MFF.

Parliament urged Commission to present a medium- and long-term political and financial plan to deal with the migration crisis and its impact on the 2017 budget. It highlighted the need to address the root causes of the migration phenomenon and stressed that the financing of the migration and refugee crisis should not undermine or hinder the implementation of other important EU policies. In this light, Parliament underlined that solidarity is an underlying principle of the EU budget. It reiterated the call for the Commission to come up with a proposal as to how the EU budget can prompt Member States towards a more balanced approach to solidarity.

It also expressed its deep concern at the lack of adequate protection for unaccompanied minors all along the route to a safe place and calls for a thorough investigation into the case of the 10 000 missing children reported by EUROPOL.

Parliament also stressed the importance of enhanced financing for resettlement schemes, relocation procedures and return operations, notably under the Asylum, Migration and Immigration Fund ( AMIF ), in order to achieve an effective European asylum and migration policy while preventing and reducing irregular migration.

Payments : in the budgets for 2015 and 2016, the Commission refrained in any cases from asking for additional payment appropriations for a number of its crisis responses (frontloading of EUR 2 billion for Greece, first initiatives in the area of migration), instead of reverting to the redeployment of already existing resources. In this regard, Parliament stated that this has increased the burden on payment appropriations in 2016 and beyond. This has potentially re-created a situation where appropriations may not be sufficient to meet the actual needs of financial programmes across headings, impacting project leaders and citizens directly.

Parliament is concerned that this situation, added to the delay in starting the implementation of programmes under shared management, could re-create the conditions which led, at the end of the last MFF, to an unprecedented level of RALs and an unsustainable backlog of outstanding payment claims. It recalled their longstanding position that unforeseen payment needs should be financed with fresh appropriations.

MFF revision : lastly, Parliament recalled that the compulsory review of the MFF 2014-2020 should be accompanied by a legislative proposal for revision of the MFF by the end of 2016. The purpose of the review/revision is to assess the qualitative and quantitative functioning of the MFF and to address systemic shortcomings of the Union budget, as well as to ensure that the Union is granted sufficient resources to effectively address internal and external crises and finance evolving political priorities for the second half of the current MFF.

Parliament underlined that the Council should take on responsibility for ensuring that the necessary appropriations are made available to respond to the financing of new tasks and unforeseen circumstances, including through an upward revision of the MFF ceilings .

Reiterating its position in favour of the necessary in-depth reform of the system of Union own resources, Parliament stressed that if there is to be a completely independent EU budget, genuine own resources have to be put in place.

Documents
2016/03/09
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/03/08
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/02/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Jens GEIER (S&D, DE) on the general guidelines for the preparation of the 2017 budget, Section III – Commission.

The report stated that the 2017 budget should lay down the path towards economic growth and job creation. However, it is likely to be affected by the evolving migration and refugee crisis as well as coinciding with the mid-term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF).

Limited budget capacity : although the Union budget has proven to be a crucial resource in tackling recent crises and has responded to needs that had not been necessarily anticipated during the negotiation of the MFF 2014-2020, Members stressed that the limited capacity of the Union budget to tackle these crises is at this stage primarily the result of the use of all means available agreed on in the MFF negotiations, and particularly of the use of special instruments such as the flexibility instrument.

In this context, the Council is urged to reconsider its position on the question of budgeting the MFF special instruments so as to alleviate the constraints weighing on the Union budget. They reiterated the view that the payment appropriations for the special instruments (the flexibility instrument, the EU Solidarity Fund, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the Emergency Aid Reserve) should be calculated over and above the MFF ceilings , as is the case for commitments.

Improved budgeting : Members strongly believe that boosting investment (public and private) is a proper policy response with a view to a more balanced economic policy. They called for more synergies between the Union dimension of the European Semester for economic policy coordination and the Union budget, which is also the cornerstone for a stable euro area.

Regretting that the Union budget has in recent years been a collateral victim of Member States’ duplicitous behaviour, Members called for further flexibility regarding expenditures made by Member States in specific fields, such as investments in the framework of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the fight against unemployment, poverty and inequality, also in the light of the need to deal with emerging security threats and the migrant and refugee crisis.

Members regretted the fact that corporate tax avoidance has caused huge losses of tax income for Member States, and therefore a reduction in their contributions to the EU budget.

The report stressed that the 2017 budget will be impacted by internal and external security challenges. Therefore, the importance of the EU budgetary instruments, such as the Internal Security Fund (ISF), was emphasised.

Funding programmes : Members reiterated the commitment to reinforce Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility through the annual budgetary procedure and stressed the importance of Horizon 2020, COSME, programmes funding SMEs, Erasmus+, and programmes and policies that support the development of an innovation-friendly environment and contribute to the success of Europe 2020.

As regards the youth employment initiative (YEI), Members reiterated their commitment to continue funding for this programme. A permanent solution for the funding of YEI through new commitment appropriations up to 2020 will be part of the mid-term revision of the MFF.

The report also stressed the importance of enhanced financing for resettlement schemes, relocation procedures and return operations, notably under the Asylum, Migration and Immigration Fund ( AMIF ), in order to achieve an effective European asylum and migration policy while preventing and reducing irregular migration.

Payments : in the budgets for 2015 and 2016, the Commission refrained in any cases from asking for additional payment appropriations for a number of its crisis responses (frontloading of EUR 2 billion for Greece, first initiatives in the area of migration), instead of reverting to the redeployment of already existing resources. In this regard, Members stated that this has increased the burden on payment appropriations in 2016 and beyond. This has potentially re-created a situation where appropriations may not be sufficient to meet the actual needs of financial programmes across headings, impacting project leaders and citizens directly.

Members are concerned that this situation, added to the delay in starting the implementation of programmes under shared management, could re-create the conditions which led, at the end of the last MFF, to an unprecedented level of RALs and an unsustainable backlog of outstanding payment claims. They recalled their longstanding position that unforeseen payment needs should be financed with fresh appropriations.

MFF revision : lastly, the report recalled that the compulsory review of the MFF 2014-2020 should be accompanied by a legislative proposal for revision of the MFF by the end of 2016. The purpose of the review/revision is to assess the qualitative and quantitative functioning of the MFF and to address systemic shortcomings of the Union budget, as well as to ensure that the Union is granted sufficient resources to effectively address internal and external crises and finance evolving political priorities for the second half of the current MFF;

Members underlined that the Council should take on responsibility for ensuring that the necessary appropriations are made available to respond to the financing of new tasks and unforeseen circumstances, including through an upward revision of the MFF ceilings . Reiterating their position in favour of the necessary in-depth reform of the system of Union own resources, Members stressed that if there is to be a completely independent EU budget, genuine own resources have to be put in place.

Documents
2016/02/18
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/02/12
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2016/02/12
   CSL - Council Meeting
2016/02/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/01/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/12/03
   EP - GEIER Jens (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 26 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 357, +: 258, 0: 85
IT EL PT ES CY GB IE MT LU EE FI LT LV DK SI SK HU HR RO AT SE CZ BG NL BE DE PL FR
Total
70
20
19
51
6
64
10
6
5
5
12
11
7
12
8
12
19
11
31
18
18
20
15
24
21
90
46
68
icon: S&D S&D
177

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2
5

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

6

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Portugal ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
207

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 29 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 505, +: 99, 0: 97
EL IE LU EE CY LT DK LV MT SI FI PT HR CZ SK SE HU AT BG FR NL BE IT PL ES RO GB DE
Total
20
10
5
5
6
11
12
7
6
8
12
19
11
20
12
18
19
18
15
68
24
21
70
47
51
31
64
90
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

3

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

For (1)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 30 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 562, 0: 74, +: 63
EL IE CY LU EE LV SI MT PT LT DK FI HR SK SE CZ HU AT BG NL BE ES RO IT PL GB FR DE
Total
20
10
6
5
5
7
7
6
19
11
12
12
11
12
18
20
19
18
15
24
21
51
31
70
47
64
67
90
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

For (1)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
206

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 8 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 558, +: 96, 0: 43
CY LU EE EL IE MT DK LV FI SI LT HR SE PT SK NL CZ BE HU BG AT IT GB FR RO ES PL DE
Total
6
5
5
19
10
6
12
7
12
8
11
11
18
19
12
24
20
21
19
15
18
69
64
68
31
51
47
88
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6
icon: ECR ECR
64

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
175

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
206

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 32/1 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 581, 0: 73, +: 48
EL CY IE LU EE LV MT SI LT FI HR DK SK HU PT AT SE CZ BG BE NL ES RO PL IT FR GB DE
Total
20
6
10
5
5
7
6
8
11
12
11
12
12
19
19
18
18
20
16
21
24
51
31
45
70
68
65
91
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

6
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
206

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 35 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 587, +: 81, 0: 34
IE LU EL CY LV EE MT SI LT DK FI PT HR SK SE CZ HU BG AT NL BE IT ES RO PL FR GB DE
Total
10
5
20
6
7
5
6
7
11
12
12
19
11
12
18
20
19
16
18
24
21
69
51
31
47
68
65
91
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
5

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 38S #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 595, +: 98, 0: 11
EL IE CY LU EE MT LV SI SE DK FI PT LT HR SK CZ NL BG AT HU BE FR GB ES RO PL IT DE
Total
20
10
6
5
5
6
7
8
19
12
12
19
11
11
12
20
24
16
18
19
21
68
65
51
31
47
70
91
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 13 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 555, +: 121, 0: 27
IE CY DK EL LU EE MT FI LV SI LT HR SK SE CZ PT NL HU BG AT IT BE FR GB ES RO PL DE
Total
10
6
12
20
5
5
6
12
7
8
11
11
12
19
20
19
24
19
16
18
70
21
68
65
51
31
47
89
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
2
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Finland ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
205

Cyprus PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 15 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 522, +: 142, 0: 41
GB DK CY LU EE FI NL MT LV SI LT HR AT IE SK BE EL SE BG CZ IT PT HU PL FR RO ES DE
Total
65
12
6
5
5
12
24
6
7
8
11
11
18
10
12
21
20
19
16
20
70
19
19
47
68
31
51
91
icon: ECR ECR
65
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
2

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Finland ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
180
3

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
207

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
3

Lithuania PPE

2

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 16 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 482, +: 191, 0: 28
GB IT FI NL DK CY SE LU EE PL IE MT LT LV SK SI HR BE AT BG EL CZ HU PT FR RO ES DE
Total
65
70
12
24
12
6
19
5
5
46
10
6
11
7
12
8
11
20
18
16
20
20
18
19
68
31
51
90
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
180

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4
icon: PPE PPE
204
3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Belgium PPE

3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 22 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: +: 483, -: 206, 0: 14
DE IT ES FR BE PT SE EL AT IE HR FI SI NL MT LT EE DK CY LU RO LV BG CZ SK HU GB PL
Total
91
70
51
68
21
19
19
20
18
10
11
12
8
24
6
11
5
12
6
5
31
7
16
20
12
18
64
47
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
3

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4
icon: PPE PPE
206
5
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Czechia ALDE

For (1)

4

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

France GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
65

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 40 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 549, +: 120, 0: 36
IE EL CY SE EE LU LV SI MT DK FI LT HR PT SK AT NL CZ HU BG BE ES IT GB RO PL DE FR
Total
10
20
6
19
5
5
7
8
6
12
12
11
11
19
12
18
24
20
19
16
21
51
70
65
31
47
91
68
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
3

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Cyprus PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 41/1 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: +: 647, -: 33, 0: 23
DE FR IT ES GB PL RO CZ BE PT SE NL EL HU BG FI SK LT HR IE AT DK SI LV CY MT LU EE
Total
91
67
70
51
65
46
31
20
21
19
19
24
20
19
16
12
12
11
11
10
18
12
8
7
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
207
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

Against (1)

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2
2

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 41/2 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 551, +: 147, 0: 6
SE IE EL CY MT EE LU LV SI LT HU DK FI PT HR NL AT SK BE CZ BG ES IT RO GB PL DE FR
Total
19
10
20
6
6
5
5
7
8
11
19
12
12
19
11
24
18
12
21
20
16
51
70
31
65
47
90
68
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2
4
3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

4

Czechia S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
206

Cyprus PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 23S #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 358, +: 333, 0: 12
GB HU FR ES SE EL DE PT CY NL IE RO MT LU EE IT AT LT LV FI SI SK HR DK BE CZ BG PL
Total
65
18
68
51
19
19
91
19
6
24
10
31
6
5
5
70
18
11
7
12
8
12
11
12
21
20
16
47
icon: S&D S&D
180
4

Greece S&D

4

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

Against (2)

4
3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

3

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
205

Cyprus PPE

2
3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 42 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 431, +: 261, 0: 10
ES PT CY SE IE EL MT LU EE AT DE FI LV SI LT HR IT RO HU NL DK BE SK BG GB CZ FR PL
Total
50
19
6
19
10
20
6
5
5
18
90
11
7
8
11
11
70
31
19
24
12
21
12
16
65
20
68
47
icon: S&D S&D
180

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4
3

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Portugal ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
207

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2
3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 18 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 481, +: 170, 0: 52
GB CY EL DK MT LU FI EE IE LT LV SI SK HR SE NL BE BG PT IT CZ HU AT FR PL ES RO DE
Total
65
6
20
12
6
5
12
5
10
11
7
8
12
11
19
24
21
16
19
70
20
18
18
68
47
51
31
90
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
2

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
178

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Hungary S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 19 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 564, +: 81, 0: 58
LU EE CY MT LV DK SI FI AT IE HR SK GB LT NL EL CZ BG SE BE PT HU IT FR RO PL ES DE
Total
5
5
6
6
7
12
7
12
18
10
11
12
65
11
24
20
20
16
19
21
19
19
70
68
31
47
50
91
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
2
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
65

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
179

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 2 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 568, +: 99, 0: 37
AT IE CY EE LU FI LV EL SI MT DK SE LT HR PT SK BG CZ HU BE NL ES RO PL DE GB FR IT
Total
18
10
6
5
5
12
7
20
8
6
12
19
11
11
19
12
16
20
19
21
24
51
31
47
90
65
68
70
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Austria ENF

Against (1)

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
3

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Cyprus PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 4 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 540, +: 132, 0: 30
AT EL IE CY EE LU FI LV SE DK SI MT LT HR PT SK BG NL HU BE CZ ES IT GB RO PL DE FR
Total
18
20
10
6
5
5
12
7
19
12
8
6
11
11
19
12
16
24
19
21
20
51
70
65
31
45
90
68
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
64

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
179

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
206

Cyprus PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 3 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 527, +: 134, 0: 39
AT IE EL CY EE LU LV SE FI DK SI MT SK LT HR NL GB PT BG HU BE CZ ES RO DE PL IT FR
Total
18
10
19
6
5
5
7
19
12
12
8
6
11
11
11
23
65
18
16
19
21
20
51
31
90
47
70
68
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
179

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

3

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
204

Cyprus PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Netherlands PPE

2

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Am 24/1 #

2016/03/09 Outcome: -: 586, +: 113, 0: 5
IE EL CY EE LU LV LT SI MT FI PT HR DK HU AT SK PL CZ BG BE SE NL ES RO DE GB FR IT
Total
10
20
6
5
5
7
11
8
6
12
19
11
12
19
18
12
47
20
16
21
19
24
50
31
91
65
68
70
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (2)

6
icon: NI NI
13

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Cyprus PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
3

A8-0036/2016 - Jens Geier - Résolution #

2016/03/09 Outcome: +: 425, -: 200, 0: 78
DE ES PL RO IT HU FR PT BG LT BE HR AT SI SK MT CZ LV EL LU EE FI IE DK CY SE NL GB
Total
89
51
47
31
70
19
68
19
16
11
21
11
18
8
12
6
20
7
20
5
5
12
10
12
6
19
24
65
icon: PPE PPE
205
2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

2
icon: S&D S&D
180
3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Malta S&D

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

4

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

Against (1)

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48
4

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
AmendmentsDossier
200 2016/2004(BUD)
2016/02/02 BUDG 200 amendments...
source: 576.816

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
NÍ RIADA Liadh
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.161
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-575161_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.816
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AM-576816_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0036_EN.html title: A8-0036/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0036_EN.html title: A8-0036/2016
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160308&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-03-08-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2016-03-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0080_EN.html title: T8-0080/2016
summary
events/5
date
2016-03-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0080_EN.html title: T8-0080/2016
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
rapporteur
name: GEIER Jens date: 2015-12-03T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
date
2015-12-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GEIER Jens group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0036&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0036_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0080
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0080_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2016-02-12T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3445
  • date: 2016-02-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2015-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens
  • date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0036&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0036/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160308&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26850&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0080 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0080/2016 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
date
2015-12-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GEIER Jens group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
BUDG
date
2015-12-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: S&D name: GEIER Jens
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3445 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3445*&MEET_DATE=12/02/2016 date: 2016-02-12T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2016-01-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.161 title: PE575.161 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.816 title: PE576.816 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2016-02-12T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2016-02-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0036&language=EN title: A8-0036/2016 summary: The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Jens GEIER (S&D, DE) on the general guidelines for the preparation of the 2017 budget, Section III – Commission. The report stated that the 2017 budget should lay down the path towards economic growth and job creation. However, it is likely to be affected by the evolving migration and refugee crisis as well as coinciding with the mid-term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF). Limited budget capacity : although the Union budget has proven to be a crucial resource in tackling recent crises and has responded to needs that had not been necessarily anticipated during the negotiation of the MFF 2014-2020, Members stressed that the limited capacity of the Union budget to tackle these crises is at this stage primarily the result of the use of all means available agreed on in the MFF negotiations, and particularly of the use of special instruments such as the flexibility instrument. In this context, the Council is urged to reconsider its position on the question of budgeting the MFF special instruments so as to alleviate the constraints weighing on the Union budget. They reiterated the view that the payment appropriations for the special instruments (the flexibility instrument, the EU Solidarity Fund, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the Emergency Aid Reserve) should be calculated over and above the MFF ceilings , as is the case for commitments. Improved budgeting : Members strongly believe that boosting investment (public and private) is a proper policy response with a view to a more balanced economic policy. They called for more synergies between the Union dimension of the European Semester for economic policy coordination and the Union budget, which is also the cornerstone for a stable euro area. Regretting that the Union budget has in recent years been a collateral victim of Member States’ duplicitous behaviour, Members called for further flexibility regarding expenditures made by Member States in specific fields, such as investments in the framework of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the fight against unemployment, poverty and inequality, also in the light of the need to deal with emerging security threats and the migrant and refugee crisis. Members regretted the fact that corporate tax avoidance has caused huge losses of tax income for Member States, and therefore a reduction in their contributions to the EU budget. The report stressed that the 2017 budget will be impacted by internal and external security challenges. Therefore, the importance of the EU budgetary instruments, such as the Internal Security Fund (ISF), was emphasised. Funding programmes : Members reiterated the commitment to reinforce Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility through the annual budgetary procedure and stressed the importance of Horizon 2020, COSME, programmes funding SMEs, Erasmus+, and programmes and policies that support the development of an innovation-friendly environment and contribute to the success of Europe 2020. As regards the youth employment initiative (YEI), Members reiterated their commitment to continue funding for this programme. A permanent solution for the funding of YEI through new commitment appropriations up to 2020 will be part of the mid-term revision of the MFF. The report also stressed the importance of enhanced financing for resettlement schemes, relocation procedures and return operations, notably under the Asylum, Migration and Immigration Fund ( AMIF ), in order to achieve an effective European asylum and migration policy while preventing and reducing irregular migration. Payments : in the budgets for 2015 and 2016, the Commission refrained in any cases from asking for additional payment appropriations for a number of its crisis responses (frontloading of EUR 2 billion for Greece, first initiatives in the area of migration), instead of reverting to the redeployment of already existing resources. In this regard, Members stated that this has increased the burden on payment appropriations in 2016 and beyond. This has potentially re-created a situation where appropriations may not be sufficient to meet the actual needs of financial programmes across headings, impacting project leaders and citizens directly. Members are concerned that this situation, added to the delay in starting the implementation of programmes under shared management, could re-create the conditions which led, at the end of the last MFF, to an unprecedented level of RALs and an unsustainable backlog of outstanding payment claims. They recalled their longstanding position that unforeseen payment needs should be financed with fresh appropriations. MFF revision : lastly, the report recalled that the compulsory review of the MFF 2014-2020 should be accompanied by a legislative proposal for revision of the MFF by the end of 2016. The purpose of the review/revision is to assess the qualitative and quantitative functioning of the MFF and to address systemic shortcomings of the Union budget, as well as to ensure that the Union is granted sufficient resources to effectively address internal and external crises and finance evolving political priorities for the second half of the current MFF; Members underlined that the Council should take on responsibility for ensuring that the necessary appropriations are made available to respond to the financing of new tasks and unforeseen circumstances, including through an upward revision of the MFF ceilings . Reiterating their position in favour of the necessary in-depth reform of the system of Union own resources, Members stressed that if there is to be a completely independent EU budget, genuine own resources have to be put in place.
  • date: 2016-03-08T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160308&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-03-09T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26850&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-03-09T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0080 title: T8-0080/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 425 votes to 200, with 78 abstentions, a resolution on the general guidelines for the preparation of the 2017 budget, Section III – Commission. Parliament stated that the 2017 budget should lay down the path towards economic growth and job creation. However, it is likely to be affected by the evolving migration and refugee crisis as well as coinciding with the mid-term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF). Limited budget capacity : although the Union budget has proven to be a crucial resource in tackling recent crises and has responded to needs that had not been necessarily anticipated during the negotiation of the MFF 2014-2020, Parliament stressed that the limited capacity of the Union budget to tackle these crises is at this stage primarily the result of the use of all means available agreed on in the MFF negotiations, and particularly of the use of special instruments such as the flexibility instrument. In this context, the Council is urged to reconsider its position on the question of budgeting the MFF special instruments so as to alleviate the constraints weighing on the Union budget. Parliament reiterated its view that the payment appropriations for the special instruments (the flexibility instrument, the EU Solidarity Fund, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the Emergency Aid Reserve) should be calculated over and above the MFF ceilings , as is the case for commitments. Improved budgeting : Parliament strongly believes that boosting investment, including through a better coordinated increase in public and private investment with a focus on the Europe 2020 targets, is a proper policy response with a view to a more balanced economic policy. It believes that those two elements should be taken into consideration in the preparation of the draft budget for 2017 insofar as this should help identify priorities within an economic context. It called, consequently, for more synergies between the Union dimension of the European Semester for economic policy coordination and the Union budget, which is also the cornerstone for a stable euro area. Parliament regretted that the Union budget has in recent years been a collateral victim of Member States’ duplicitous behaviour , which has led them to consider their contribution to the Union budget as a burden and to treat it as an adjustment variable. For the Parliament, the EU budget is an investment budget which can bring particularly strong added value by boosting growth, competitiveness and job creation in the Member States. In this respect, it drew attention to the need for Member States’ contributions to the Union budget not to be treated as an adjustment variable subject to macroeconomic conditions. It reiterated the added value of the Union budget in terms of synergies and economies of scale; emphasises the special situation of isolated and peripheral regions. In parallel, it regretted the fact that corporate tax avoidance has caused huge losses of tax income for Member States, and therefore a reduction in their contributions to the EU budget. Such unfair tax competition in some cases means GDP transfer from one Member State to another and GNI transfer to non-EU tax havens, thus reducing aggregate Member State contributions to the EU budget. It underlined that the 2017 budget will be impacted by internal and external security challenges, which may also take the form of terrorist threats or extremism, and by the implementation of the shared agenda between the Union and the Member States aimed at securing an EU area of freedom, security and justice. In this regard, Parliament stressed the importance of the EU budgetary instruments, such as the Internal Security Fund (ISF), in order to address the most crucial challenges, including through the strengthening of preventive measures as well as cross-border operational cooperation. Funding programmes : Parliament reiterated the commitment to reinforce Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility through the annual budgetary procedure and stressed the importance of Horizon 2020, COSME, programmes funding SMEs, Erasmus+, and programmes and policies that support the development of an innovation-friendly environment and contribute to the success of Europe 2020. As regards the youth employment initiative (YEI), Parliament reiterated its commitment to continued funding for this programme with a view to scaling it up and thereby offering a greater number of young people, including young migrants entering the EU, the prospect of effectively entering the labour market by receiving a good quality offer of employment, continued education or apprenticeship. It regretted that during the negotiations on the EU budget for 2016 no new commitments were allocated to further finance the YEI, while youth unemployment remains at its highest rates in the EU. A permanent solution for the funding of YEI through new commitment appropriations up to 2020 will be part of the mid-term revision of the MFF. Migrant crisis : Parliament acknowledged that in spite of the mobilisation of significant budgetary means spread over 2015 and 2016 to address the migration and refugee crisis, a solution has still not been found , be it internally within the Union or externally in refugees’ countries of origin. It stressed, however, that the budgetary means are insufficient and that substantial additional financial means are required to address this crisis . According to members, longer-term solutions should be sought, not only in the annual budgetary procedure, but also in the upcoming interim revision of the MFF. Parliament urged Commission to present a medium- and long-term political and financial plan to deal with the migration crisis and its impact on the 2017 budget. It highlighted the need to address the root causes of the migration phenomenon and stressed that the financing of the migration and refugee crisis should not undermine or hinder the implementation of other important EU policies. In this light, Parliament underlined that solidarity is an underlying principle of the EU budget. It reiterated the call for the Commission to come up with a proposal as to how the EU budget can prompt Member States towards a more balanced approach to solidarity. It also expressed its deep concern at the lack of adequate protection for unaccompanied minors all along the route to a safe place and calls for a thorough investigation into the case of the 10 000 missing children reported by EUROPOL. Parliament also stressed the importance of enhanced financing for resettlement schemes, relocation procedures and return operations, notably under the Asylum, Migration and Immigration Fund ( AMIF ), in order to achieve an effective European asylum and migration policy while preventing and reducing irregular migration. Payments : in the budgets for 2015 and 2016, the Commission refrained in any cases from asking for additional payment appropriations for a number of its crisis responses (frontloading of EUR 2 billion for Greece, first initiatives in the area of migration), instead of reverting to the redeployment of already existing resources. In this regard, Parliament stated that this has increased the burden on payment appropriations in 2016 and beyond. This has potentially re-created a situation where appropriations may not be sufficient to meet the actual needs of financial programmes across headings, impacting project leaders and citizens directly. Parliament is concerned that this situation, added to the delay in starting the implementation of programmes under shared management, could re-create the conditions which led, at the end of the last MFF, to an unprecedented level of RALs and an unsustainable backlog of outstanding payment claims. It recalled their longstanding position that unforeseen payment needs should be financed with fresh appropriations. MFF revision : lastly, Parliament recalled that the compulsory review of the MFF 2014-2020 should be accompanied by a legislative proposal for revision of the MFF by the end of 2016. The purpose of the review/revision is to assess the qualitative and quantitative functioning of the MFF and to address systemic shortcomings of the Union budget, as well as to ensure that the Union is granted sufficient resources to effectively address internal and external crises and finance evolving political priorities for the second half of the current MFF. Parliament underlined that the Council should take on responsibility for ensuring that the necessary appropriations are made available to respond to the financing of new tasks and unforeseen circumstances, including through an upward revision of the MFF ceilings . Reiterating its position in favour of the necessary in-depth reform of the system of Union own resources, Parliament stressed that if there is to be a completely independent EU budget, genuine own resources have to be put in place.
  • date: 2016-03-09T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
BUDG/8/05474
New
  • BUDG/8/05474
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.57 2017 budget
New
8.70.57
2017 budget
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
New
Procedure completed
activities/1
date
2016-02-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1/body
Old
EC
New
EP
activities/1/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2015-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens
activities/1/date
Old
2016-07-18T00:00:00
New
2016-02-18T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0300/COM_COM(2016)0300_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0300 type: Commission draft budget published celexid: CELEX:52016DC0300:EN
activities/1/type
Old
Commission draft budget published
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/20
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
BUDG/8/05474;BUDG/8/07316
New
BUDG/8/05474
activities/1/committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
activities/1/committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
activities/1/committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
activities/1/committees/3
body
EP
responsible
True
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
activities/1/committees/4/shadows
  • group: EPP name: MUREŞAN Siegfried
  • group: ECR name: KÖLMEL Bernd
  • group: ALDE name: DEPREZ Gérard
  • group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh
  • group: Verts/ALE name: MARAGALL Ernest
  • group: EFD name: ZANNI Marco
  • group: ENF name: ŻÓŁTEK Stanisław
activities/1/committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
activities/1/committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
activities/1/committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
activities/1/committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
activities/1/committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
activities/1/committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
activities/1/committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
activities/1/committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
activities/1/committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
activities/1/committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
activities/1/committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
activities/1/committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
activities/1/committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
activities/1/committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
activities/1/committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
activities/1/committees/20
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
activities/5/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52016DC0300:EN
activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0300/COM_COM(2016)0300_EN.pdf
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
True
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4/shadows
  • group: EPP name: MUREŞAN Siegfried
  • group: ECR name: KÖLMEL Bernd
  • group: ALDE name: DEPREZ Gérard
  • group: GUE/NGL name: NÍ RIADA Liadh
  • group: Verts/ALE name: MARAGALL Ernest
  • group: EFD name: ZANNI Marco
  • group: ENF name: ŻÓŁTEK Stanisław
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/20
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
BUDG/8/05474
New
BUDG/8/05474;BUDG/8/07316
activities/5
date
2016-07-18T00:00:00
docs
type: Commission draft budget published title: COM(2016)0300
type
Commission draft budget published
body
EC
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
activities/4/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26850&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted by 425 votes to 200, with 78 abstentions, a resolution on the general guidelines for the preparation of the 2017 budget, Section III – Commission.

    Parliament stated that the 2017 budget should lay down the path towards economic growth and job creation. However, it is likely to be affected by the evolving migration and refugee crisis as well as coinciding with the mid-term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF).

    Limited budget capacity: although the Union budget has proven to be a crucial resource in tackling recent crises and has responded to needs that had not been necessarily anticipated during the negotiation of the MFF 2014-2020, Parliament stressed that the limited capacity of the Union budget to tackle these crises is at this stage primarily the result of the use of all means available agreed on in the MFF negotiations, and particularly of the use of special instruments such as the flexibility instrument.

    In this context, the Council is urged to reconsider its position on the question of budgeting the MFF special instruments so as to alleviate the constraints weighing on the Union budget. Parliament reiterated its view that the payment appropriations for the special instruments (the flexibility instrument, the EU Solidarity Fund, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the Emergency Aid Reserve) should be calculated over and above the MFF ceilings, as is the case for commitments.

    Improved budgeting: Parliament strongly believes that boosting investment, including through a better coordinated increase in public and private investment with a focus on the Europe 2020 targets, is a proper policy response with a view to a more balanced economic policy. It believes that those two elements should be taken into consideration in the preparation of the draft budget for 2017 insofar as this should help identify priorities within an economic context.

    It called, consequently, for more synergies between the Union dimension of the European Semester for economic policy coordination and the Union budget, which is also the cornerstone for a stable euro area.

    Parliament regretted that the Union budget has in recent years been a collateral victim of Member States’ duplicitous behaviour, which has led them to consider their contribution to the Union budget as a burden and to treat it as an adjustment variable. For the Parliament, the EU budget is an investment budget which can bring particularly strong added value by boosting growth, competitiveness and job creation in the Member States. In this respect, it drew attention to the need for Member States’ contributions to the Union budget not to be treated as an adjustment variable subject to macroeconomic conditions. It reiterated the added value of the Union budget in terms of synergies and economies of scale; emphasises the special situation of isolated and peripheral regions.

    In parallel, it regretted the fact that corporate tax avoidance has caused huge losses of tax income for Member States, and therefore a reduction in their contributions to the EU budget. Such unfair tax competition in some cases means GDP transfer from one Member State to another and GNI transfer to non-EU tax havens, thus reducing aggregate Member State contributions to the EU budget.

    It underlined that the 2017 budget will be impacted by internal and external security challenges, which may also take the form of terrorist threats or extremism, and by the implementation of the shared agenda between the Union and the Member States aimed at securing an EU area of freedom, security and justice. In this regard, Parliament stressed the importance of the EU budgetary instruments, such as the Internal Security Fund (ISF), in order to address the most crucial challenges, including through the strengthening of preventive measures as well as cross-border operational cooperation.

    Funding programmes: Parliament reiterated the commitment to reinforce Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility through the annual budgetary procedure and stressed the importance of Horizon 2020, COSME, programmes funding SMEs, Erasmus+, and programmes and policies that support the development of an innovation-friendly environment and contribute to the success of Europe 2020.

    As regards the youth employment initiative (YEI), Parliament reiterated its commitment to continued funding for this programme with a view to scaling it up and thereby offering a greater number of young people, including young migrants entering the EU, the prospect of effectively entering the labour market by receiving a good quality offer of employment, continued education or apprenticeship. It regretted that during the negotiations on the EU budget for 2016 no new commitments were allocated to further finance the YEI, while youth unemployment remains at its highest rates in the EU.

    A permanent solution for the funding of YEI through new commitment appropriations up to 2020 will be part of the mid-term revision of the MFF.

    Migrant crisis: Parliament acknowledged that in spite of the mobilisation of significant budgetary means spread over 2015 and 2016 to address the migration and refugee crisis, a solution has still not been found, be it internally within the Union or externally in refugees’ countries of origin. It stressed, however, that the budgetary means are insufficient and that substantial additional financial means are required to address this crisis. According to members, longer-term solutions should be sought, not only in the annual budgetary procedure, but also in the upcoming interim revision of the MFF.

    Parliament urged Commission to present a medium- and long-term political and financial plan to deal with the migration crisis and its impact on the 2017 budget. It highlighted the need to address the root causes of the migration phenomenon and stressed that the financing of the migration and refugee crisis should not undermine or hinder the implementation of other important EU policies. In this light, Parliament underlined that solidarity is an underlying principle of the EU budget. It reiterated the call for the Commission to come up with a proposal as to how the EU budget can prompt Member States towards a more balanced approach to solidarity.

    It also expressed its deep concern at the lack of adequate protection for unaccompanied minors all along the route to a safe place and calls for a thorough investigation into the case of the 10 000 missing children reported by EUROPOL.

    Parliament also stressed the importance of enhanced financing for resettlement schemes, relocation procedures and return operations, notably under the Asylum, Migration and Immigration Fund (AMIF), in order to achieve an effective European asylum and migration policy while preventing and reducing irregular migration.

    Payments: in the budgets for 2015 and 2016, the Commission refrained in any cases from asking for additional payment appropriations for a number of its crisis responses (frontloading of EUR 2 billion for Greece, first initiatives in the area of migration), instead of reverting to the redeployment of already existing resources. In this regard, Parliament stated that this has increased the burden on payment appropriations in 2016 and beyond. This has potentially re-created a situation where appropriations may not be sufficient to meet the actual needs of financial programmes across headings, impacting project leaders and citizens directly.

    Parliament is concerned that this situation, added to the delay in starting the implementation of programmes under shared management, could re-create the conditions which led, at the end of the last MFF, to an unprecedented level of RALs and an unsustainable backlog of outstanding payment claims. It recalled their longstanding position that unforeseen payment needs should be financed with fresh appropriations.

    MFF revision: lastly, Parliament recalled that the compulsory review of the MFF 2014-2020 should be accompanied by a legislative proposal for revision of the MFF by the end of 2016. The purpose of the review/revision is to assess the qualitative and quantitative functioning of the MFF and to address systemic shortcomings of the Union budget, as well as to ensure that the Union is granted sufficient resources to effectively address internal and external crises and finance evolving political priorities for the second half of the current MFF.

    Parliament underlined that the Council should take on responsibility for ensuring that the necessary appropriations are made available to respond to the financing of new tasks and unforeseen circumstances, including through an upward revision of the MFF ceilings.

    Reiterating its position in favour of the necessary in-depth reform of the system of Union own resources, Parliament stressed that if there is to be a completely independent EU budget, genuine own resources have to be put in place.

activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160308&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0080 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0080/2016
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
NÍ RIADA Liadh
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
ŻÓŁTEK Stanisław
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Jens GEIER (S&D, DE) on the general guidelines for the preparation of the 2017 budget, Section III – Commission.

    The report stated that the 2017 budget should lay down the path towards economic growth and job creation. However, it is likely to be affected by the evolving migration and refugee crisis as well as coinciding with the mid-term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF).

    Limited budget capacity: although the Union budget has proven to be a crucial resource in tackling recent crises and has responded to needs that had not been necessarily anticipated during the negotiation of the MFF 2014-2020, Members stressed that the limited capacity of the Union budget to tackle these crises is at this stage primarily the result of the use of all means available agreed on in the MFF negotiations, and particularly of the use of special instruments such as the flexibility instrument.

    In this context, the Council is urged to reconsider its position on the question of budgeting the MFF special instruments so as to alleviate the constraints weighing on the Union budget. They reiterated the view that the payment appropriations for the special instruments (the flexibility instrument, the EU Solidarity Fund, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the Emergency Aid Reserve) should be calculated over and above the MFF ceilings, as is the case for commitments.

    Improved budgeting: Members strongly believe that boosting investment (public and private) is a proper policy response with a view to a more balanced economic policy. They called for more synergies between the Union dimension of the European Semester for economic policy coordination and the Union budget, which is also the cornerstone for a stable euro area.

    Regretting that the Union budget has in recent years been a collateral victim of Member States’ duplicitous behaviour, Members called for further flexibility regarding expenditures made by Member States in specific fields, such as investments in the framework of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the fight against unemployment, poverty and inequality, also in the light of the need to deal with emerging security threats and the migrant and refugee crisis.

    Members regretted the fact that corporate tax avoidance has caused huge losses of tax income for Member States, and therefore a reduction in their contributions to the EU budget.

    The report stressed that the 2017 budget will be impacted by internal and external security challenges. Therefore, the importance of the EU budgetary instruments, such as the Internal Security Fund (ISF), was emphasised.

    Funding programmes: Members reiterated the commitment to reinforce Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility through the annual budgetary procedure and stressed the importance of Horizon 2020, COSME, programmes funding SMEs, Erasmus+, and programmes and policies that support the development of an innovation-friendly environment and contribute to the success of Europe 2020.

    As regards the youth employment initiative (YEI), Members reiterated their commitment to continue funding for this programme. A permanent solution for the funding of YEI through new commitment appropriations up to 2020 will be part of the mid-term revision of the MFF.

    The report also stressed the importance of enhanced financing for resettlement schemes, relocation procedures and return operations, notably under the Asylum, Migration and Immigration Fund (AMIF), in order to achieve an effective European asylum and migration policy while preventing and reducing irregular migration.

    Payments: in the budgets for 2015 and 2016, the Commission refrained in any cases from asking for additional payment appropriations for a number of its crisis responses (frontloading of EUR 2 billion for Greece, first initiatives in the area of migration), instead of reverting to the redeployment of already existing resources. In this regard, Members stated that this has increased the burden on payment appropriations in 2016 and beyond. This has potentially re-created a situation where appropriations may not be sufficient to meet the actual needs of financial programmes across headings, impacting project leaders and citizens directly.

    Members are concerned that this situation, added to the delay in starting the implementation of programmes under shared management, could re-create the conditions which led, at the end of the last MFF, to an unprecedented level of RALs and an unsustainable backlog of outstanding payment claims. They recalled their longstanding position that unforeseen payment needs should be financed with fresh appropriations.

    MFF revision: lastly, the report recalled that the compulsory review of the MFF 2014-2020 should be accompanied by a legislative proposal for revision of the MFF by the end of 2016. The purpose of the review/revision is to assess the qualitative and quantitative functioning of the MFF and to address systemic shortcomings of the Union budget, as well as to ensure that the Union is granted sufficient resources to effectively address internal and external crises and finance evolving political priorities for the second half of the current MFF;

    Members underlined that the Council should take on responsibility for ensuring that the necessary appropriations are made available to respond to the financing of new tasks and unforeseen circumstances, including through an upward revision of the MFF ceilings. Reiterating their position in favour of the necessary in-depth reform of the system of Union own resources, Members stressed that if there is to be a completely independent EU budget, genuine own resources have to be put in place.

committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
NÍ RIADA Liadh
committees/0/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
ŻÓŁTEK Stanisław
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4
date
2016-03-09T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2
date
2016-02-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0036&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0036/2016
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1
date
2016-02-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MUREŞAN Siegfried group: ECR name: KÖLMEL Bernd group: ALDE name: DEPREZ Gérard group: Verts/ALE name: MARAGALL Ernest group: EFD name: ZANNI Marco responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2015-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens
activities/0
date
2016-02-12T00:00:00
body
CSL
type
Council Meeting
council
Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN
meeting_id
3445
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
KÖLMEL Bernd
committees/0/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
MARAGALL Ernest
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
GEORGIEVA Kristalina
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
DEPREZ Gérard
activities/0
date
2016-03-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/shadows/1
group
EFD
name
ZANNI Marco
activities
    committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MUREŞAN Siegfried responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2015-12-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      BUDG/8/05474
      reference
      2016/2004(BUD)
      title
      2017 budget: guidelines, Section III - Commission
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      subtype
      Budgetary preparation
      type
      BUD - Budgetary procedure
      subject
      8.70.57 2017 budget