Progress: Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | BUDG |
ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( PPE)
|
NEGRESCU Victor ( S&D),
KÖLMEL Bernd ( ECR),
DEPREZ Gérard ( ALDE),
VANA Monika ( Verts/ALE),
ZANNI Marco ( EFDD)
|
| Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
| Committee Opinion | REGI |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to assist Belgium in respect of redundancies its glass sector.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2016/407 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Belgium EGF/2015/007 — BE/Hainaut-Namur Glass).
CONTENT: with this present Decision, the European Parliament and the Council decided to mobilise EUR 1 095 544 in commitment and payment appropriations from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund under the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016.
This amount shall assist Belgium following redundancies and cessations of activities in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 23 (Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products) in the NUTS level 2 regions of Hainaut (B32) and Namur (B35).
In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 ( EGF Regulation ), the application from Belgium is considered admissible since the redundancies have a serious impact on employment and the local, regional and national economy. Therefore, the European Parliament and the Council decided to grant the abovementioned amount.
To recall, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) aims to provide support for workers made redundant and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, as a result of a continuation of the global financial and economic crisis, or as a result of a new global financial and economic crisis, and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.
In accordance with this Regulation, Belgium has decided to provide personalised services co-financed by the EGF also to 100 young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs).
Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 provides that the EGF shall not exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million .
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 19.3.2016. It shall apply from 9.3.2016.
The European Parliament adopted by 558 votes to 83, with 4 abstentions, a resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for an amount of EUR 1 095 544 in commitment and payment appropriations in order to assist Belgium following redundancies in its glass sector.
Parliament recalled that the Union set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market.
Belgian application : Belgium submitted application EGF/2015/007 BE/Hainaut-Namur Glass for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 23 (Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products) in the NUTS level 2 regions of Hainaut and Namur in Belgium. 412 redundant workers, as well as 100 young people from the Hainaut Region not in employment, education or training (NEETs) under the age of 25, are expected to participate in the measures. 144 of these workers were made redundant following the closure of the production plant in Roux (Hainaut), owned by AGC Europe SA, and 268 following the closure of the production plant in Auvelais (Namur Region), owned by Saint-Gobain Glass Benelux.
This application does not fulfil the eligibility criteria set down in Article 4(1) of the EGF Regulation.
It was submitted under the intervention criteria, which allow for derogation under exceptional circumstances, notably Article 4(2) of the EGF Regulation in the case of the redundant workers, and Article 6(2) of the EGF Regulation in the case of the NEETs.
Therefore, Belgium is entitled to a financial contribution.
Nature of the redundancies : Parliament noted that in recent years the Union trade in glass products has undergone serious disruptions and that in Wallonia, several of large enterprises have faced difficulties in the recent years. It noted that employment in the glass sector as a whole in Europe decreased by 32% and that in Wallonia, the number of jobs in the glass sector in the regions of Namur and Hainaut decreased by 19% between 2007 and 2012 and 1 236 job losses in 2013 and 1 878 in 2014 in Wallonia.
Parliament pointed out that Hainaut, in particular, is facing a difficult labour market situation with an employment rate 9.2% lower than the national average. It noted that, in 2013, the Saint-Gobain Group was forced to close another production plant in a deindustrialised zone in Wallonia (SaintGobain Sekurit application).
A package of personalised services : Parliament welcomed the fact that the Belgian authorities started providing the personalised services to the affected workers on 10 September 2014, well ahead of the decision on the granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package.
It noted that Belgium is planning seven types of measures for redundant workers covered by this application:
support/guidance/interpretation, facilitating job-search, integrated training, transfer of experiences, support for enterprise creation, support for collective projects, job-search and training allowances.
It also welcomed that the application contains measures specifically aimed to provide assistance to NEETs and appreciated that the allowances and incentives to be provided as part of the proposed measures are limited to 5.52% of the total estimated costs.
Members recalled that in line with the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy.
Parliament underlined that in the case of successive applications from the same geographical region, the Commission should collect and analyse the experiences from previous applications and ensure that, in the case of new applications, any conclusion of that analysis is taken into due account. It noted that the Belgian authorities confirm that the eligible actions do not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments.
It also recalled the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career.
Lastly, Parliament appreciated the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following the Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants.
The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ (EPP, CZ) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for an amount of EUR 1 095 544 in commitment and payment appropriations in order to assist Belgium following redundancies in its glass sector.
Members recalled that the Union set up legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market.
Belgian application : Belgium submitted application EGF/2015/007 BE/Hainaut-Namur Glass for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 23 (Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products) in the NUTS level 2 regions of Hainaut and Namur in Belgium. 412 redundant workers, as well as 100 young people from the Hainaut Region not in employment, education or training (NEETs) under the age of 25, are expected to participate in the measures. 144 of these workers were made redundant following the closure of the production plant in Roux (Hainaut), owned by AGC Europe SA, and 268 following the closure of the production plant in Auvelais (Namur Region), owned by Saint-Gobain Glass Benelux.
This application does not fulfil the eligibility criteria set down in Article 4(1) of the EGF Regulation.
It was submitted under the intervention criteria, which allow for derogation under exceptional circumstances, notably Article 4(2) of the EGF Regulation in the case of the redundant workers, and Article 6(2) of the EGF Regulation in the case of the NEETs.
Therefore, Belgium is entitled to a financial contribution.
Nature of the redundancies : Members noted that employment in the glass sector as a whole in Europe decreased by 32% and that in Wallonia, the number of jobs in the glass sector in the regions of Namur and Hainaut decreased by 19% between 2007 and 2012 and 1 236 job losses in 2013 and 1 878 in 2014 in Wallonia.
Members pointed out that Hainaut, in particular, is facing a difficult labour market situation with an employment rate 9.2% lower than the national average. They noted that, in 2013, the Saint-Gobain Group was forced to close another production plant in a deindustrialised zone in Wallonia (EGF/2013/011 BE/SaintGobain Sekurit application).
A package of personalised services : Members welcomed the fact that the Belgian authorities started providing the personalised services to the affected workers on 10 September 2014, well ahead of the decision on the granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package.
They noted that Belgium is planning seven types of measures for redundant workers covered by this application:
support/guidance/interpretation, facilitating job-search, integrated training, transfer of experiences, support for enterprise creation, support for collective projects, job-search and training allowances.
They welcomed that the application contains measures specifically aimed to provide assistance to NEETs and appreciated that the allowances and incentives to be provided as part of the proposed measures are limited to 5.52% of the total estimated costs.
They recalled that in line with the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy.
They also recalled the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career. Members noted that the Belgian authorities confirm that the eligible actions do not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments.
Lastly, Members appreciated the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following the Parliament's request for the accelerated release of grants.
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to assist Belgium in respect of redundancies its glass sector.
PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.
CONTENT: Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 provides that the EGF shall not exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million (2011 prices) over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework.
The rules applicable to financial contributions from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) are laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 .
In this context, the Commission examined the application for mobilisation of the EGF to assist Belgium and concluded the following:
Belgium: EGF/2015/007 BE/Hainaut-Namur Glass : on 19 August 2015, Belgium submitted an application EGF/2015/007 BE/HainautNamur Glass for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 23 (Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products) in the NUTS level 2 regions of Hainaut (BE32) and Namur (BE35) in Belgium.
Belgium submitted its application within the 12 week deadline laid down in the Regulation. The deadline within which the Commission should finalise its assessment of the application's compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution expires on 20 January 2016.
In order to establish the link between the redundancies and major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, Belgium argued that Union trade in glass products has undergone serious disruptions in recent years. While demand has stagnated in Europe between 2000 and 2013, imports have dramatically increased, with foreign producers capturing a growing share of the European market. This can be explained by the fact that a production overcapacity in Asia (notably in China) has resulted in downward price pressure, which European producers find hard to cope with, due to higher production costs and stricter environmental standards, notably CO2 emission quotas.
Between 2000 and 2010, in the glass sector as a whole, employment decreased by 32 % in Europe (particularly affecting Germany, Poland, France and Belgium). Production of glass in Belgium fell below 1 million tons in 2009 for the first time since the mid-sixties, and it continued to decrease by 5 % in both 2011 and 2012.
The event giving rise to these redundancies is the closure of two production plants in Wallonia owned by the two enterprises, AGC Europe SA and Saint-Gobain Glass Benelux, respectively.
To date, the Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products sector has been the subject of five EGF applications, two of which (including this one) based on trade related globalisation and three on the global financial and economic crisis
Basis of the Belgian application : Belgium submitted the application under the intervention criteria of Article 4(2) derogating from the criteria of Article 4(1) (b) of the EGF Regulation, which requires at least 500 workers being made redundant over a reference period of nine months in enterprises operating in the same economic sector defined at NACE Revision 2 Division and located in one region or two contiguous regions defined at NUTS 2 level in a Member State.
The reference period of nine months for the application runs from 31 August 2014 to 31 May 2015.
There were 412 redundancies combined in the NUTS level 2 regions of Hainaut (B32) and Namur (B35).
Having examined this application, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services is EUR 1 095 544 .
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: having examined the application in respect of the conditions set out in Article 13(1) of the EGF Regulation, and having taken into account the number of targeted beneficiaries, the proposed actions and the estimated costs, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the amount of EUR 1 095 544, representing 60% of the total costs of the proposed actions, in order to provide a financial contribution for the application.
The proposed decision to mobilise the EGF will be taken jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, as laid down in point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management.
At the same time as it presents this proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF, the Commission will present to the European Parliament and to the Council a proposal for a transfer to the relevant budgetary line for the requested amount.
At the same time as it adopts this proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF, the Commission will adopt a decision on a financial contribution, by means of an implementing act, which will enter into force on the date at which the European Parliament and the Council adopt the proposed decision to mobilise the EGF.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2016/407
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 074 19.03.2016, p. 0034
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0057/2016
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary: A8-0029/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.804
- Committee draft report: PE575.348
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2016)0001
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE575.348
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.804
Activities
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
- Jonathan ARNOTT
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
- Hugues BAYET
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
- Louise BOURS
- Renata BRIANO
- Steeve BRIOIS
- Gianluca BUONANNO
- Alain CADEC
- James CARVER
- Nicola CAPUTO
- Salvatore CICU
- Alberto CIRIO
- Jane COLLINS
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
- Pál CSÁKY
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
- Edward CZESAK
- Michel DANTIN
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
- Rachida DATI
- Isabella DE MONTE
- Norbert ERDŐS
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
- Lorenzo FONTANA
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
- Elena GENTILE
- Arne GERICKE
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
- Antanas GUOGA
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
- Brian HAYES
- Marian HARKIN
- Mike HOOKEM
- Carlos ITURGAIZ
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
- Diane JAMES
- Marc JOULAUD
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
- Philippe JUVIN
- Barbara KAPPEL
- Afzal KHAN
- Giovanni LA VIA
- Marine LE PEN
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
- Vladimír MAŇKA
- Ivana MALETIĆ
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
- Jiří MAŠTÁLKA
- Notis MARIAS
- Valentinas MAZURONIS
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
- Marlene MIZZI
- Sophie MONTEL
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
- Franz OBERMAYR
- Margot PARKER
- Alojz PETERLE
- Florian PHILIPPOT
- Marijana PETIR
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
- Miroslav POCHE
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
- Marcus PRETZELL
- Claude ROLIN
- Fernando RUAS
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
- Jasenko SELIMOVIC
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
- Siôn SIMON
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
- Davor ŠKRLEC
- Igor ŠOLTES
- Beatrix von STORCH
- Patricija ŠULIN
- Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
- Pavel TELIČKA
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
- Miguel VIEGAS
- Jana ŽITŇANSKÁ
Votes
A8-0029/2016 - Tomáš Zdechovský - Résolution #
GUE/NGL
ENF
NI| Amendments | Dossier |
| 10 |
2016/2013(BUD)
2016/02/10
BUDG
10 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that Saint-Gobain Group was in 2013 forced to close another production plant in Wallonia which was subject of the EGF/2013/011 BE/Saint-Gobain Sekurit application relating to 257 redundancies in the same sector; notes that several measures in the two applications are similar ;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Reiterates that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures for restructuring companies or sectors;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that the derogation from Article 4(1)(a) of the EGF Regulation in this case relates to the number of redundancies which is not significantly lower than the threshold of 500 redundancies; welcomes that the application aims to support a further 100 NEETs;
Amendment 3 #
7a. Welcomes the support for collective projects; calls on the Commission to assess the results of this type of measure in other applications in order to determine its benefits to the participants;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Appreciates that the allowances and incentives to be provided as part of the proposed measures are limited to 5,52 % of the total estimated costs;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Welcomes the extension of the access to the EGF for NEETs; notes however that this access is currently limited by the EGF Regulation until 31 December 2017; calls for the revision of the EGF Regulation, in the framework of the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework, in order to enable the access of NEETs to continue after 2017, especially if the mid-term evaluation of the EGF demonstrates the need to further include the support for NEETs;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Underlines that in case of successive applications from the same geographical region the Commission should collect and analyse the experiences from previous applications and ensure that in case of new applications any conclusion of that analysis is taken into due account;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Asks the Commission to further detail, in future proposals, the sectors in which the workers are likely to find employment and if the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals, especially considering that this EGF application related to Saint- Gobain Group redundancies in a deindustrialised zone is the second one to be submitted to the Parliament within the past 12 months ;
source: 576.804
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.348New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-575348_EN.html |
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.804New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AM-576804_EN.html |
| events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
| events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
| events/3 |
|
| events/3 |
|
| events/6 |
|
| events/6 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0029&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0029_EN.html |
| events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0057New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0057_EN.html |
| activities |
|
| commission |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| council |
|
| docs |
|
| events |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/8/05577New
|
| procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32016D0407New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32016D0407 |
| procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
| activities/6 |
|
| procedure/final |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
| activities/4 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
| activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/4/docs |
|
| activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
| activities/2/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
| activities/2 |
|
| activities/3 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
| activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
| committees/0/shadows |
|
| activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
| activities/1 |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
BUDG/8/05577
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
| activities |
|
| committees |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure |
|