BETA


Events

2016/12/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/12/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 433 votes to 174 with 93 votes a resolution on the Annual Report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

It noted that the European Union faces unprecedented internal and external challenges, and is now surrounded by an arc of instability , as large parts of the Middle East and North Africa are engulfed in ethno-religious conflicts and proxy wars. These conflicts have direct and serious consequences for the security and well-being of EU citizens as they increasingly spill over into the EU, be it in the form of terrorism, massive refugee flows, or disinformation campaigns aimed at dividing our societies.

Continuing the EU’s success story : noting that the EU is one of the greatest achievements in European history, Parliament welcomed the roadmap and the commitments of the Bratislava summit of 16 September 2016, but felt that the current challenges demand reform . Member States must change their mentality since nowadays thinking about foreign policy and security in a narrow minded national perspective is obsolete. Parliament was convinced that no single Member State alone could tackle any of the challenges alone. It urged Member States to finally show sufficient levels of unity, political will and trust in one another to make it possible to use the tools at hand in a concerted manner. In this respect, it called for an effective implementation of the EU Global Strategy presented by the VP/HR in June 2016, including the appropriate human and financial resources to be allocated by Member States. In addition, Members called on the VP/HR to devise an implementation plan on security and defence, complemented by a White Book process, in order to deliver first results in 2017.

The resolution suggested that EU external action should be based on three pillars: diplomacy, development and defence. It also pointed out how recent crises have shown the limits of the United Nations, and called on the EU and its Member States to bring all their weight to bear in an attempt to reform the Security Council, in particular with a view to removing the veto with regard to mass atrocities.

Taking responsibility for security : noting that since power politics is again dominating international relations, and defence and deterrence capabilities are critical for leverage in diplomatic talks, Parliament emphasised that the EU must strengthen its security and defence capabilities. In view of an already underfinanced EU budget, it felt that additional efforts for operations, administrative costs, preparatory actions and pilot projects under the Common Security and Defence Policy, additional funding from Member States, as well as efforts to enhance synergies, are also needed. It called on the Commission and the Member States to seize the opportunity of the current revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) to address the budgetary needs for the growing security challenges.

Furthermore, the instruments provided by the Treaty of Lisbon must finally be implemented, notably Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO). Members called on the VP/HR to take the lead on this initiative, as well as on other recent proposals, including the following:

the creation of a permanent civilian and military headquarter, with an equally important Military Planning and Conduct Capability and Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability ; enhancing the EU’s rapid reaction tools, notably by further improving the usability of battlegroups ; extending the common financing of CSDP operations, including through an urgent review of the Athena mechanism ; setting up a Defence configuration of the Council.

Parliament encouraged the speeding up of the ongoing work on the European Defence Action Plan and the Commission’s efforts to maximise defence cooperation, including through incentives in areas such as the internal market, public procurement, research, transport, space, cyber, energy and industrial policies. It noted the proposal by the French President for a European Security and Defence Fund, and supported the development of new and innovative financing and investment concepts, including through the European Investment Bank and public-private partnerships.

Russia: Parliament felt that it is time to define a new, more realistic strategy for the EU’s relations with Russia, based on credible deterrence but also on dialogue in areas of common interest, such as counter-terrorism, non-proliferation and trade. It underlined at the same time the importance of investing more into cooperation with and support to Russian civil society, so as to strengthen the long-term basis of EU-Russia relations. It felt that sanctions have proven to be an effective means of deterring further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and insisted that the EU should keep open the option of further gradual sanctions, in particular against high-technology products in the oil and gas, IT and armaments sectors, if Russia continues to violate international law.

ENI: noting that the revised European Neighbourhood Instrument has not lived up to its goals, especially when it comes to the 'more for more' principle, Parliament encouraged consideration of the policy of less for less with regard to those countries which go into reverse in terms of governance, democracy, and human rights.

Building resilience : Parliament took the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflict, bad governance, climate change, human rights abuses, inequality and trade policies which do not address these challenges.

On Syria, it highlighted the importance of finding a sustainable solution to the conflict in line with the transition process set out in the Geneva Communiqué and UNSC resolution 2254 (2015), noting that the bilateral negotiations between Russia and the United States will not be sufficient to bring about a sustainable response to the Syrian crisis. In addition, the committee made recommendations on West Africa and the Sahel, Turkey and the Middle East.

European diplomacy : Parliament urged the EU to show political leadership in preventive diplomacy and conflict mediation, and welcomed in this regard the role of the EU Conflict Early Warning System, the EEAS Mediation Support Team and the European Institute of Peace.

Lastly, it regretted the limited budget of around EUR 320 million (0.2 % of the EU budget) for the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), stressing that the budget allocations decided for 2016 remain at the same level as 2015 and that the margin available at the end of March was EUR 170 million. It expressed concern at the shortage of resources available in view of the commitments that will have to be met throughout 2016.

Documents
2016/12/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/12/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/11/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Elmar BROK (EPP, DE) on the Annual Report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

Members noted that the European Union faces unprecedented internal and external challenges, and is now surrounded by an arc of instability , as large parts of the Middle East and North Africa are engulfed in ethno-religious conflicts and proxy wars. These conflicts have direct and serious consequences for the security and well-being of EU citizens as they increasingly spill over into the EU, be it in the form of terrorism, massive refugee flows, or disinformation campaigns aimed at dividing our societies.

Continuing the EU’s success story : noting that the EU is one of the greatest achievements in European history, Members welcomed the roadmap and the commitments of the Bratislava summit of 16 September 2016, but felt that the current challenges demand reform . Member States must change their mentality since nowadays thinking about foreign policy and security in a narrow minded national perspective is obsolete. The committee was convinced that no single Member State alone could tackle any of the challenges alone. It urged Member States to finally show sufficient levels of unity, political will and trust in one another to make it possible to use the tools at hand in a concerted manner. In this respect, it called for an effective implementation of the EU Global Strategy presented by the VP/HR in June 2016, including the appropriate human and financial resources to be allocated by Member States. In addition, Members called on the VP/HR to devise an implementation plan on security and defence, complemented by a White Book process, in order to deliver first results in 2017.

The resolution suggested that EU external action should be based on three pillars: diplomacy, development and defence.

Taking responsibility for security : noting that since power politics is again dominating international relations, and defence and deterrence capabilities are critical for leverage in diplomatic talks, Members emphasised that the EU must strengthen its security and defence capabilities. In view of an already underfinanced EU budget, they felt that additional efforts for operations, administrative costs, preparatory actions and pilot projects under the Common Security and Defence Policy, additional funding from Member States, as well as efforts to enhance synergies, are also needed. They called on the Commission and the Member States to seize the opportunity of the current revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) to address the budgetary needs for the growing security challenges.

Furthermore, the instruments provided by the Treaty of Lisbon must finally be implemented, notably Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO). Members called on the VP/HR to take the lead on this initiative, as well as on other recent proposals, including the following:

the creation of a permanent civilian and military headquarter, with an equally important Military Planning and Conduct Capability and Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability; enhancing the EU’s rapid reaction tools, notably by further improving the usability of battlegroups ; extending the common financing of CSDP operations, including through an urgent review of the Athena mechanism ; setting up a Defence configuration of the Council.

Russia : taking the view that it is time to define a new, more realistic strategy for the EU’s relations with Russia, Members underlined at the same time the importance of investing more into Russian civil society. They felt that sanctions have proven to be an effective means of deterring further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and insisted that the EU should keep open the option of further gradual sanctions, in particular against high-technology products in the oil and gas, IT and armaments sectors, if Russia continues to violate international law.

ENI : noting that the revised European Neighbourhood Instrument has not lived up to its goals, especially when it comes to the 'more for more' principle, Members encouraged consideration of the policy of less for less with regard to those countries which go into reverse in terms of governance, democracy, and human rights.

Building resilience : Members took the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflict, bad governance, climate change, human rights abuses, inequality and trade policies which do not address these challenges.

On Syria, they highlighted the importance of finding a sustainable solution to the conflict in line with the transition process set out in the Geneva Communiqué and UNSC resolution 2254 (2015), noting that the bilateral negotiations between Russia and the United States will not be sufficient to bring about a sustainable response to the Syrian crisis. In addition, the committee made recommendations on West Africa and the Sahel, Turkey and the Middle East.

European diplomacy : Members urged the EU to show political leadership in preventive diplomacy and conflict mediation, and welcomed in this regard the role of the EU Conflict Early Warning System, the EEAS Mediation Support Team and the European Institute of Peace.

Lastly, they regretted the limited budget of around EUR 320 million (0.2 % of the EU budget) for the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), stressing that the budget allocations decided for 2016 remain at the same level as 2015 and that the margin available at the end of March was EUR 170 million. They expressed concern at the shortage of resources available in view of the commitments that will have to be met throughout 2016.

In a minority report, 4 GUE/NGL Members tabled objections to the report, stating it fostered further EU-militarization, stronger EU-NATO cooperation, and the merger of internal and external security.

Documents
2016/11/24
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2016/10/18
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/10/18
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/10/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/05/24
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/04/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/03/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2016/02/26
   EP - DZHAMBAZKI Angel (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2016/02/03
   EP - ARTHUIS Jean (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2015/10/13
   EP - BROK Elmar (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0360/2016 - Elmar Brok - Am 14

2016/12/14 Outcome: -: 616, +: 69, 0: 15
IE CY LV MT EL LU EE SI LT DK CZ FI HR SK SE AT BG PT NL BE HU ES IT RO PL GB FR DE
Total
10
5
6
5
21
5
6
8
10
12
21
13
11
13
20
18
16
18
25
21
20
48
68
30
50
64
69
86
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Hungary NI

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

France NI

2

Germany NI

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ENF ENF
38

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

4

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0360/2016 - Elmar Brok - § 1

2016/12/14 Outcome: +: 498, 0: 111, -: 98
DE IT ES RO PL FR BE HU PT AT BG SE CZ HR SK LT NL FI SI GB LV LU IE DK EE MT CY EL
Total
87
68
48
30
50
71
21
20
21
18
15
19
21
11
13
10
26
13
8
65
6
6
10
12
6
5
5
21
icon: PPE PPE
208

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
181

Bulgaria S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

Against (1)

4

Sweden ALDE

2

Czechia ALDE

Against (1)

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

4

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0360/2016 - Elmar Brok - § 3

2016/12/14 Outcome: +: 450, -: 184, 0: 70
DE PL RO ES IT BE BG PT HU SK CZ HR FR LT SI NL FI DK SE LU EE AT MT LV CY IE EL GB
Total
86
50
29
48
68
21
16
21
19
13
21
11
71
10
8
25
13
12
20
6
6
17
5
6
4
10
21
66
icon: PPE PPE
206

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
178
3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

A8-0360/2016 - Elmar Brok - § 7

2016/12/14 Outcome: +: 514, -: 140, 0: 48
DE PL ES RO FR BE IT HU SE PT BG CZ NL AT SK LT HR GB DK LU FI EE SI MT LV IE CY EL
Total
86
48
48
29
70
20
68
20
20
21
15
21
26
18
13
10
10
66
12
6
13
6
8
5
6
10
5
21
icon: PPE PPE
205

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0360/2016 - Elmar Brok - § 10

2016/12/14 Outcome: +: 559, -: 120, 0: 27
DE IT PL ES RO GB BE FR BG HU SE CZ PT SK HR DK AT LT NL SI FI EE LU MT LV IE CY EL
Total
86
68
50
48
30
65
21
71
16
20
20
21
21
13
11
12
18
10
25
8
13
6
5
5
6
10
5
21
icon: PPE PPE
208

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
180
3

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

France NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GU