BETA


Events

2017/03/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/11/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/11/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

Parliament adopted by 567 votes to 5, with 39 abstentions, a resolution in response to the Commission communication aiming to propose an EU action plan against wildlife trafficking.

International crime in need of a coordinated approach : Members recalled that wildlife trafficking is an organised international crime which is estimated to be worth approximately EUR 20 billion annually , becoming one of the biggest and most profitable forms of organised cross-border crime. There are links between wildlife crime and other forms of organised crime, including money laundering and the financing of militias and terrorist groups.

Welcoming the Commission action plan against wildlife trafficking, Parliament called on the European Commission, the Member States, the European External Action Service and the EU agencies Europol and Eurojust to recognise that wildlife crime is a serious and growing threat and to address it with the greatest political urgency.

The resolution highlighted the need:

for comprehensive and coordinated approaches across policy areas including trade, development, foreign affairs, transport and tourism, and justice and home affairs; to provide adequate financial resources in the EU budget and the national budgets in order to ensure effective implementation of this plan; to set up an ongoing detailed monitoring and evaluation mechanism to measure progress.

The Commission is called upon to establish a dedicated Wildlife Trafficking Coordinator’s office , mirroring the model used to fight human trafficking.

Preventing wildlife trafficking and addressing its root causes : Members called for a targeted and coordinated series of awareness-raising campaigns by the EU, third countries, stakeholders and civil society with the aim of reducing demand related to the illegal trade in wildlife products. They called on the EU to address corruption and the shortcomings of international governance measures across the wildlife trafficking chain.

The governments of the supply countries are urged to:

improve the rule of law and create effective deterrents by strengthening criminal investigation, prosecution and sentencing; enact stronger laws treating illicit wildlife trafficking as a ‘serious crime’; commit to a zero-tolerance policy on corruption.

Making implementation and enforcement more effective : Member States are called upon to put in place wildlife trafficking action plans and to publish and exchange the information on seizures and arrests relating to wildlife crimes.

Parliament called on the Member States to:

set appropriate levels of sanctions for wildlife crime offences and for the Commission to take steps towards establishing and implementing common minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions relating to wildlife trafficking; engage with the operators of social media platforms, search engines and e-commerce platforms on the problem of the illegal internet trade in wildlife . The Commission and the Member States are called upon to strengthen control measures and to develop policies to address potential illegal activity on the internet.

Strengthening the global partnership : Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to step up dialogue and cooperation with source, transit and destination countries in the wildlife trafficking supply chain and to provide them with technical and economic assistance and diplomatic support. It called for a trust fund or similar facility to be set up with the objective of safeguarding protected areas and combating wildlife trafficking and poaching.

The Commission is called upon to include mandatory and enforceable sustainable development chapters in all EU trade agreements and negotiations , with specific reference to halting illegal trade in wildlife in all economic sectors.

EU as a destination market, source and transit point : Parliament underlined that trophy hunting has contributed to large-scale declines in endangered species. It suggested:

the adoption of a precautionary approach for the import of hunting trophies from species protected under the EU Wildlife Trade Regulations; the full and immediate ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within the EU and to destinations outside the EU of ivory.

The resolution also called on the EU to strengthen the existing control instruments, including the use of traceability mechanisms . The transport sector should play a pivotal role, for example by implementing an early warning detection system. The role of public-private partnerships is highlighted in this regard.

Lastly, Parliament called for Member States to introduce in-country compliance monitoring with regular checks on traders and permit holders such as pet shops, breeders, research centres and nurseries, and including monitoring of trades such as fashion, art, medicine and catering, that may use illegal plant and animal parts.

Documents
2016/11/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/11/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/10/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted an own-initiative report by Catherine BEARDER (ADLE, UK) in response to the Commission communication aiming to propose an EU action plan against wildlife trafficking.

Members recalled that wildlife trafficking is an organised international crime which is estimated to be worth approximately EUR 20 billion annually , becoming one of the biggest and most profitable forms of organised cross-border crime.

Wildlife trafficking has major negative impacts on biodiversity , existing ecosystems, the natural heritage of the countries of origin, natural resources and the conservation of species. It is a serious and growing threat to global security.

Welcoming the Commission action plan against wildlife trafficking, Members called on the European Commission, the Member States, the European External Action Service and the EU agencies Europol and Eurojust to recognise that wildlife crime is a serious and growing threat and to address it with the greatest political urgency.

The report highlighted the need: (i) for comprehensive and coordinated approaches across policy areas including trade, development, foreign affairs, transport and tourism, and justice and home affairs; (ii) to provide adequate financial resources in the EU budget and the national budgets in order to ensure effective implementation of this plan; (iii) to set up an ongoing detailed monitoring and evaluation mechanism to measure progress.

The Commission is called upon to establish a dedicated Wildlife Trafficking Coordinator’s office , mirroring the model used to fight human trafficking.

Preventing wildlife trafficking and addressing its root causes : Members called for a targeted and coordinated series of awareness-raising campaigns by the EU, third countries, stakeholders and civil society with the aim of reducing demand related to the illegal trade in wildlife products. They called on the EU to address corruption and the shortcomings of international governance measures across the wildlife trafficking chain.

The report insisted on the need to provide assistance, guidance and training to authorities in source, transit and destination countries concerning investigation, enforcement and judicial procedures at local, regional and national level.

The governments of the supply countries are urged to: (i) improve the rule of law and create effective deterrents by strengthening criminal investigation, prosecution and sentencing ; (ii) enact stronger laws treating illicit wildlife trafficking as a ‘ serious crime ’; (iii) commit to a zero-tolerance policy on corruption.

Making implementation and enforcement more effective : Member States are called upon to put in place wildlife trafficking action plans detailing enforcement policies and penalties, and to publish and exchange the information on seizures and arrests relating to wildlife crimes, in order to ensure consistency and harmonised approaches between Member States.

Members proposed that the penalties for wildlife trafficking, especially in areas with vulnerable marine ecosystems or falling within the Natura 2000 network, should be sufficiently severe as to deter potential offenders. They also stressed that in order to avoid the ‘migration’ of wildlife criminal networks, the harmonisation of policies and legal frameworks with respect to wildlife crime is particularly important.

Members are urged to set appropriate levels of sanctions for wildlife crime offences and for the Commission to take steps towards establishing and implementing common minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions relating to wildlife trafficking.

Strengthening the global partnership : the report called on the Commission and the Member States to step up dialogue and cooperation with source, transit and destination countries in the wildlife trafficking supply chain and to provide them with technical and economic assistance and diplomatic support. It called for a trust fund or similar facility to be set up with the objective of safeguarding protected areas and combating wildlife trafficking and poaching.

The Commission is called upon to include mandatory and enforceable sustainable development chapters in all EU trade agreements and negotiations , with specific reference to halting illegal trade in wildlife in all economic sectors.

EU as a destination market, source and transit point : Members called on the EU to review the existing legislative framework with a view to supplementing it with a prohibition on the making available and placing on the market, transport, acquisition and possession of wildlife that has been illegally harvested or traded in third countries. They suggested:

the adoption of a precautionary approach for the import of hunting trophies from species protected under the EU Wildlife Trade Regulations; the full and immediate ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within the EU and to destinations outside the EU of ivory.

The report also called on the EU to strengthen the existing control instruments, including the use of traceability mechanisms . The transport sector should play a pivotal role, for example by implementing an early warning detection system. The role of public-private partnerships is highlighted in this regard.

Lastly, the report called for Member States to introduce in-country compliance monitoring with regular checks on traders and permit holders such as pet shops, breeders, research centres and nurseries, and including monitoring of trades such as fashion, art, medicine and catering, that may use illegal plant and animal parts.

Documents
2016/10/13
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/10/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/10/04
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/09/28
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/09/12
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/09/09
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/07/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/06/28
   EP - SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in PECH
2016/06/23
   EP - HAYES Brian (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2016/05/23
   EP - MCCLARKIN Emma (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2016/05/12
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2016/04/13
   EP - BEARDER Catherine (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2016/02/26
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to propose EU action plan against trafficking in wildlife.

BACKGROUND: wildlife trafficking – particularly in elephants and rhinos, corals, pangolins, tigers and great apes - has become one of the world's most profitable organised crimes . As an example, the illicit ivory trade has more than doubled since 2007, and is over three times greater than it was in 1998. Between 2007 and 2013, rhino poaching increased by 7000% in South Africa, endangering the very survival of this species. Sources estimate the profits from such trafficking at between EUR 8 and EUR 20 billion annually.

The EU has an important role to play in tackling this traffic, as Europe is currently a destination market and a hub for trafficking in transit to other regions. It is also a region from which certain species are sourced for illegal trade.

Numerous measures to combat wildlife trafficking have been adopted under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), a key international treaty regulating the international trade in wildlife, to which the EU became a party in 2015. The EU has already shown leadershi p in tackling the illegal trade in natural resources by adopting ambitious policies on timber and fishery products.

The European Parliament called for an Action Plan in a resolution adopted in January 2014. The establishment of an EU Action Plan has also been supported by many EU Member States, international organisations, NGOs, and concerned businesses at a stakeholder consultation on the EU approach against wildlife trafficking, launched by the Commission in February 2014.

CONTENT: the EU Action Plan demonstrates that the EU is ready to live up to international expectations and commitments, and that it is raising the level of its ambition as regards action against the illegal trade in wildlife. It is a major contribution towards the Sustainable Development Goals set under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development agreed by heads of state at a UN summit in September 2015.

The EU Action Plan comprises a series of measures to be taken by EU institutions and/or Member States. It provides the impetus and framework for making better use of existing EU resources. The measures are essentially designed to improve cooperation between all the players concerned, make more effective use of existing tools and policies, and strengthen synergies between them, so that wildlife trafficking can be better tackled across the EU and globally.

The measures, which are designed to address a complex problem holistically by involving all relevant organisations, are based on three priorities:

1) Preventing wildlife trafficking and addressing its root causes:

reduce the demand for and the supply of illegal wildlife products , both within the EU and globally, by supporting specific campaigns and further limiting ivory trade within and from the EU ; ensure that rural communities in source countries are more engaged in wildlife conservation, and that they benefit more from it; engage more actively with relevant business sectors , ranging from those active in wildlife trade or using wildlife products to those that provide services to the trade; take multilateral and bilateral measures to tackle corruption , a crucial enabling factor for wildlife trafficking throughout the enforcement chain.

2) Implementing and enforcing existing rules and combating organised wildlife crime more effectively:

review shortcomings in implementation for all Member States, and develop strategies for tackling them, to ensure that existing rules are enforced more consistently across the EU; strengthen the strategic aspect of checks and enforcement by setting enforcement priorities jointly and having Europol and Eurojust provide dedicated support for cross-border cases; boost the capacity of all links in the enforcement chain and the judiciary to take effective action against wildlife trafficking in the EU. By improving inter-agency data flow and by sharing best practice at EU level; ensure targeted awareness-raising amongst specialists on organised crime, cybercrime and money laundering; ensure that Member States’ laws on organised crime cover wildlife trafficking and that appropriate penalties can be imposed for trafficking ; improve international cooperation on enforcement through participation in international law enforcement operations, technical assistance and targeted financial support.

3) Strengthening the global partnership of source, consumer and transit countries against wildlife trafficking:

take measures to step up funding to support developing countries in their efforts to combat wildlife trafficking; use more efficiently the diplomatic tools of the EU and its Member States and other tools, notably EU trade policy, in relations with key source, transit and consumer countries and relevant regional organisations; develop better tools to tackle the links between wildlife trafficking and security that exist in some regions; use the existing multilateral processes , in international agreements and fora, to keep the issue on the global agenda.

Monitoring and evaluation : the Action Plan covers the five years from 2016 to 2020. The Commission services and the EEAS will establish a scoreboard to monitor implementation. The Commission will report to the Council and the European Parliament by July 2018 on implementation of the action plan, Progress made and the success of the action plan in curbing wildlife trafficking will be evaluated in 2020 . On that basis, the Commission will consider what further action is needed.

The Action Plan will supersede Commission Recommendation No 2007/425/EC identifying a set of actions for the enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0303/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 55 #

2016/11/24 Outcome: +: 570, -: 34, 0: 8
DE IT ES PL FR GB RO NL BE PT CZ SE HU BG EL FI DK SK AT HR LT LV IE LU EE MT SI CY
Total
83
57
45
42
65
51
28
22
18
18
16
15
15
13
14
11
11
11
18
9
7
7
7
6
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
180

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
156

Netherlands S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
28

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
31

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

A8-0303/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 56 #

2016/11/24 Outcome: +: 471, -: 83, 0: 52
IT GB DE PL ES NL FR BE RO PT BG EL SE CZ HR DK FI LT LU SK MT IE EE CY LV AT SI HU
Total
57
50
78
42
44
22
66
18
27
18
14
14
14
16
10
11
12
8
6
10
6
6
6
5
7
18
5
15
icon: S&D S&D
153

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
3

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
29

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: PPE PPE
174
4
4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Slovakia PPE

Against (2)

4

Ireland PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

4

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ENF ENF
32

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

A8-0303/2016 - Catherine Bearder - § 58 #

2016/11/24 Outcome: +: 597, 0: 15, -: 1
DE FR IT ES GB PL RO NL PT CZ AT BE SE BG EL HU FI DK SK HR LT LV LU IE EE MT SI CY
Total
83
65
59
44
51
42
27
22
19
17
17
16
15
14
14
14
12
11
11
10
8
7
6
6
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
179

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Ireland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
157

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
29

Germany EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

A8-0303/2016 - Catherine Bearder - Résolution #

2016/11/24 Outcome: +: 567, 0: 39, -: 5
DE IT FR ES GB PL RO NL PT CZ BE SE AT HU BG FI EL DK SK HR LT LV IE LU EE MT SI CY
Total
83
58
63
43
51
41
28
22
19
17
17
15
18
15
14
12
13
11
11
9
8
7
7
6
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
178

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
157

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
29

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
30

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Austria ENF

4
AmendmentsDossier
424 2016/2076(INI)
2016/07/14 JURI 72 amendments...
source: 587.424
2016/07/18 DEVE 64 amendments...
source: 585.605
2016/09/05 INTA 44 amendments...
source: 587.528
2016/09/09 ENVI 188 amendments...
source: 589.210
2016/09/21 PECH 56 amendments...
source: 589.277

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
OMARJEE Younous
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
committees/5/rapporteur
  • name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas date: 2016-05-24T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.074
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-582074_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.210
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-589210_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.184&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-584184_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.147&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-584147_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.212&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-584212_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.608&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-585608_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2016-10-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0303_EN.html title: A8-0303/2016
summary
events/3
date
2016-10-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0303_EN.html title: A8-0303/2016
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161123&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-11-23-TOC_EN.html
events/6
date
2016-11-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0454_EN.html title: T8-0454/2016
summary
events/6
date
2016-11-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0454_EN.html title: T8-0454/2016
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: BEARDER Catherine date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2016-04-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEARDER Catherine group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: HAYES Brian date: 2016-06-23T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2016-06-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAYES Brian group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MCCLARKIN Emma date: 2016-05-23T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
rapporteur
name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo date: 2016-06-28T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2016-06-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas date: 2016-05-24T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/6/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0303&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0303_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0454
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0454_EN.html
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2016-06-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAYES Brian group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2016-06-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAYES Brian group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
activities
  • date: 2016-02-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0087/COM_COM(2016)0087_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0087 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52016DC0087:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment Commissioner: VELLA Karmenu type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2016-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PETIR Marijana group: S&D name: MELIOR Susanne group: ECR name: DEMESMAEKER Mark group: GUE/NGL name: OMARJEE Younous group: Verts/ALE name: TAYLOR Keith group: EFD name: AFFRONTE Marco group: ENF name: D'ORNANO Mireille responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2016-05-23T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2016-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2016-06-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: S&D name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo
  • date: 2016-10-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2016-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PETIR Marijana group: S&D name: MELIOR Susanne group: ECR name: DEMESMAEKER Mark group: GUE/NGL name: OMARJEE Younous group: Verts/ALE name: TAYLOR Keith group: EFD name: AFFRONTE Marco group: ENF name: D'ORNANO Mireille responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2016-04-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2016-05-23T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2016-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2016-06-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: S&D name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo
  • date: 2016-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0303&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0303/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161123&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0454 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0454/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Environment commissioner: VELLA Karmenu
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2016-04-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEARDER Catherine group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2016-06-23T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2016-06-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAYES Brian group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ENVI
date
2016-04-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2016-06-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
PECH
date
2016-06-28T00:00:00
committee_full
Fisheries
rapporteur
group: S&D name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo
docs
  • date: 2016-07-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.074 title: PE582.074 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.210 title: PE589.210 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.184&secondRef=03 title: PE584.184 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.147&secondRef=02 title: PE584.147 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-10-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.212&secondRef=03 title: PE584.212 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.608&secondRef=02 title: PE585.608 committee: PECH type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27728&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)148 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-02-26T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0087/COM_COM(2016)0087_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0087 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0087 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to propose EU action plan against trafficking in wildlife. BACKGROUND: wildlife trafficking – particularly in elephants and rhinos, corals, pangolins, tigers and great apes - has become one of the world's most profitable organised crimes . As an example, the illicit ivory trade has more than doubled since 2007, and is over three times greater than it was in 1998. Between 2007 and 2013, rhino poaching increased by 7000% in South Africa, endangering the very survival of this species. Sources estimate the profits from such trafficking at between EUR 8 and EUR 20 billion annually. The EU has an important role to play in tackling this traffic, as Europe is currently a destination market and a hub for trafficking in transit to other regions. It is also a region from which certain species are sourced for illegal trade. Numerous measures to combat wildlife trafficking have been adopted under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), a key international treaty regulating the international trade in wildlife, to which the EU became a party in 2015. The EU has already shown leadershi p in tackling the illegal trade in natural resources by adopting ambitious policies on timber and fishery products. The European Parliament called for an Action Plan in a resolution adopted in January 2014. The establishment of an EU Action Plan has also been supported by many EU Member States, international organisations, NGOs, and concerned businesses at a stakeholder consultation on the EU approach against wildlife trafficking, launched by the Commission in February 2014. CONTENT: the EU Action Plan demonstrates that the EU is ready to live up to international expectations and commitments, and that it is raising the level of its ambition as regards action against the illegal trade in wildlife. It is a major contribution towards the Sustainable Development Goals set under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development agreed by heads of state at a UN summit in September 2015. The EU Action Plan comprises a series of measures to be taken by EU institutions and/or Member States. It provides the impetus and framework for making better use of existing EU resources. The measures are essentially designed to improve cooperation between all the players concerned, make more effective use of existing tools and policies, and strengthen synergies between them, so that wildlife trafficking can be better tackled across the EU and globally. The measures, which are designed to address a complex problem holistically by involving all relevant organisations, are based on three priorities: 1) Preventing wildlife trafficking and addressing its root causes: reduce the demand for and the supply of illegal wildlife products , both within the EU and globally, by supporting specific campaigns and further limiting ivory trade within and from the EU ; ensure that rural communities in source countries are more engaged in wildlife conservation, and that they benefit more from it; engage more actively with relevant business sectors , ranging from those active in wildlife trade or using wildlife products to those that provide services to the trade; take multilateral and bilateral measures to tackle corruption , a crucial enabling factor for wildlife trafficking throughout the enforcement chain. 2) Implementing and enforcing existing rules and combating organised wildlife crime more effectively: review shortcomings in implementation for all Member States, and develop strategies for tackling them, to ensure that existing rules are enforced more consistently across the EU; strengthen the strategic aspect of checks and enforcement by setting enforcement priorities jointly and having Europol and Eurojust provide dedicated support for cross-border cases; boost the capacity of all links in the enforcement chain and the judiciary to take effective action against wildlife trafficking in the EU. By improving inter-agency data flow and by sharing best practice at EU level; ensure targeted awareness-raising amongst specialists on organised crime, cybercrime and money laundering; ensure that Member States’ laws on organised crime cover wildlife trafficking and that appropriate penalties can be imposed for trafficking ; improve international cooperation on enforcement through participation in international law enforcement operations, technical assistance and targeted financial support. 3) Strengthening the global partnership of source, consumer and transit countries against wildlife trafficking: take measures to step up funding to support developing countries in their efforts to combat wildlife trafficking; use more efficiently the diplomatic tools of the EU and its Member States and other tools, notably EU trade policy, in relations with key source, transit and consumer countries and relevant regional organisations; develop better tools to tackle the links between wildlife trafficking and security that exist in some regions; use the existing multilateral processes , in international agreements and fora, to keep the issue on the global agenda. Monitoring and evaluation : the Action Plan covers the five years from 2016 to 2020. The Commission services and the EEAS will establish a scoreboard to monitor implementation. The Commission will report to the Council and the European Parliament by July 2018 on implementation of the action plan, Progress made and the success of the action plan in curbing wildlife trafficking will be evaluated in 2020 . On that basis, the Commission will consider what further action is needed. The Action Plan will supersede Commission Recommendation No 2007/425/EC identifying a set of actions for the enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein.
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-10-13T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-10-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0303&language=EN title: A8-0303/2016 summary: The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted an own-initiative report by Catherine BEARDER (ADLE, UK) in response to the Commission communication aiming to propose an EU action plan against wildlife trafficking. Members recalled that wildlife trafficking is an organised international crime which is estimated to be worth approximately EUR 20 billion annually , becoming one of the biggest and most profitable forms of organised cross-border crime. Wildlife trafficking has major negative impacts on biodiversity , existing ecosystems, the natural heritage of the countries of origin, natural resources and the conservation of species. It is a serious and growing threat to global security. Welcoming the Commission action plan against wildlife trafficking, Members called on the European Commission, the Member States, the European External Action Service and the EU agencies Europol and Eurojust to recognise that wildlife crime is a serious and growing threat and to address it with the greatest political urgency. The report highlighted the need: (i) for comprehensive and coordinated approaches across policy areas including trade, development, foreign affairs, transport and tourism, and justice and home affairs; (ii) to provide adequate financial resources in the EU budget and the national budgets in order to ensure effective implementation of this plan; (iii) to set up an ongoing detailed monitoring and evaluation mechanism to measure progress. The Commission is called upon to establish a dedicated Wildlife Trafficking Coordinator’s office , mirroring the model used to fight human trafficking. Preventing wildlife trafficking and addressing its root causes : Members called for a targeted and coordinated series of awareness-raising campaigns by the EU, third countries, stakeholders and civil society with the aim of reducing demand related to the illegal trade in wildlife products. They called on the EU to address corruption and the shortcomings of international governance measures across the wildlife trafficking chain. The report insisted on the need to provide assistance, guidance and training to authorities in source, transit and destination countries concerning investigation, enforcement and judicial procedures at local, regional and national level. The governments of the supply countries are urged to: (i) improve the rule of law and create effective deterrents by strengthening criminal investigation, prosecution and sentencing ; (ii) enact stronger laws treating illicit wildlife trafficking as a ‘ serious crime ’; (iii) commit to a zero-tolerance policy on corruption. Making implementation and enforcement more effective : Member States are called upon to put in place wildlife trafficking action plans detailing enforcement policies and penalties, and to publish and exchange the information on seizures and arrests relating to wildlife crimes, in order to ensure consistency and harmonised approaches between Member States. Members proposed that the penalties for wildlife trafficking, especially in areas with vulnerable marine ecosystems or falling within the Natura 2000 network, should be sufficiently severe as to deter potential offenders. They also stressed that in order to avoid the ‘migration’ of wildlife criminal networks, the harmonisation of policies and legal frameworks with respect to wildlife crime is particularly important. Members are urged to set appropriate levels of sanctions for wildlife crime offences and for the Commission to take steps towards establishing and implementing common minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions relating to wildlife trafficking. Strengthening the global partnership : the report called on the Commission and the Member States to step up dialogue and cooperation with source, transit and destination countries in the wildlife trafficking supply chain and to provide them with technical and economic assistance and diplomatic support. It called for a trust fund or similar facility to be set up with the objective of safeguarding protected areas and combating wildlife trafficking and poaching. The Commission is called upon to include mandatory and enforceable sustainable development chapters in all EU trade agreements and negotiations , with specific reference to halting illegal trade in wildlife in all economic sectors. EU as a destination market, source and transit point : Members called on the EU to review the existing legislative framework with a view to supplementing it with a prohibition on the making available and placing on the market, transport, acquisition and possession of wildlife that has been illegally harvested or traded in third countries. They suggested: the adoption of a precautionary approach for the import of hunting trophies from species protected under the EU Wildlife Trade Regulations; the full and immediate ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within the EU and to destinations outside the EU of ivory. The report also called on the EU to strengthen the existing control instruments, including the use of traceability mechanisms . The transport sector should play a pivotal role, for example by implementing an early warning detection system. The role of public-private partnerships is highlighted in this regard. Lastly, the report called for Member States to introduce in-country compliance monitoring with regular checks on traders and permit holders such as pet shops, breeders, research centres and nurseries, and including monitoring of trades such as fashion, art, medicine and catering, that may use illegal plant and animal parts.
  • date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161123&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27728&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0454 title: T8-0454/2016 summary: Parliament adopted by 567 votes to 5, with 39 abstentions, a resolution in response to the Commission communication aiming to propose an EU action plan against wildlife trafficking. International crime in need of a coordinated approach : Members recalled that wildlife trafficking is an organised international crime which is estimated to be worth approximately EUR 20 billion annually , becoming one of the biggest and most profitable forms of organised cross-border crime. There are links between wildlife crime and other forms of organised crime, including money laundering and the financing of militias and terrorist groups. Welcoming the Commission action plan against wildlife trafficking, Parliament called on the European Commission, the Member States, the European External Action Service and the EU agencies Europol and Eurojust to recognise that wildlife crime is a serious and growing threat and to address it with the greatest political urgency. The resolution highlighted the need: for comprehensive and coordinated approaches across policy areas including trade, development, foreign affairs, transport and tourism, and justice and home affairs; to provide adequate financial resources in the EU budget and the national budgets in order to ensure effective implementation of this plan; to set up an ongoing detailed monitoring and evaluation mechanism to measure progress. The Commission is called upon to establish a dedicated Wildlife Trafficking Coordinator’s office , mirroring the model used to fight human trafficking. Preventing wildlife trafficking and addressing its root causes : Members called for a targeted and coordinated series of awareness-raising campaigns by the EU, third countries, stakeholders and civil society with the aim of reducing demand related to the illegal trade in wildlife products. They called on the EU to address corruption and the shortcomings of international governance measures across the wildlife trafficking chain. The governments of the supply countries are urged to: improve the rule of law and create effective deterrents by strengthening criminal investigation, prosecution and sentencing; enact stronger laws treating illicit wildlife trafficking as a ‘serious crime’; commit to a zero-tolerance policy on corruption. Making implementation and enforcement more effective : Member States are called upon to put in place wildlife trafficking action plans and to publish and exchange the information on seizures and arrests relating to wildlife crimes. Parliament called on the Member States to: set appropriate levels of sanctions for wildlife crime offences and for the Commission to take steps towards establishing and implementing common minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions relating to wildlife trafficking; engage with the operators of social media platforms, search engines and e-commerce platforms on the problem of the illegal internet trade in wildlife . The Commission and the Member States are called upon to strengthen control measures and to develop policies to address potential illegal activity on the internet. Strengthening the global partnership : Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to step up dialogue and cooperation with source, transit and destination countries in the wildlife trafficking supply chain and to provide them with technical and economic assistance and diplomatic support. It called for a trust fund or similar facility to be set up with the objective of safeguarding protected areas and combating wildlife trafficking and poaching. The Commission is called upon to include mandatory and enforceable sustainable development chapters in all EU trade agreements and negotiations , with specific reference to halting illegal trade in wildlife in all economic sectors. EU as a destination market, source and transit point : Parliament underlined that trophy hunting has contributed to large-scale declines in endangered species. It suggested: the adoption of a precautionary approach for the import of hunting trophies from species protected under the EU Wildlife Trade Regulations; the full and immediate ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within the EU and to destinations outside the EU of ivory. The resolution also called on the EU to strengthen the existing control instruments, including the use of traceability mechanisms . The transport sector should play a pivotal role, for example by implementing an early warning detection system. The role of public-private partnerships is highlighted in this regard. Lastly, Parliament called for Member States to introduce in-country compliance monitoring with regular checks on traders and permit holders such as pet shops, breeders, research centres and nurseries, and including monitoring of trades such as fashion, art, medicine and catering, that may use illegal plant and animal parts.
  • date: 2016-11-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment commissioner: VELLA Karmenu
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ENVI/8/06099
New
  • ENVI/8/06099
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.70.01 Protection of natural resources: fauna, flora, nature, wildlife, countryside; biodiversity
  • 6.20.02 Export/import control, trade defence
  • 6.20.05 Multilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
New
3.70.01
Protection of natural resources: fauna, flora, nature, wildlife, countryside; biodiversity
6.20.02
Export/import control, trade defence, trade barriers
6.20.05
Multilateral and plurilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
activities/5
date
2016-11-24T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0454 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0454/2016
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2
date
2016-10-13T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3
date
2016-10-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0303&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0303/2016
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/4/date
Old
2016-11-21T00:00:00
New
2016-11-23T00:00:00
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161123&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in Parliament
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2016-11-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/2
group
ECR
name
DEMESMAEKER Mark
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
AFFRONTE Marco
committees/1/shadows/2
group
ECR
name
DEMESMAEKER Mark
committees/1/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
AFFRONTE Marco
activities/1/committees/5/date
2016-06-28T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/5/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo
committees/5/date
2016-06-28T00:00:00
committees/5/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo
activities/1/committees/0/date
2016-06-23T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
committees/0/date
2016-06-23T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
activities/1/committees/1/date
2016-04-13T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine
activities/1/committees/1/shadows
  • group: EPP name: PETIR Marijana
  • group: S&D name: MELIOR Susanne
  • group: GUE/NGL name: OMARJEE Younous
  • group: Verts/ALE name: TAYLOR Keith
  • group: ENF name: D'ORNANO Mireille
committees/1/date
2016-04-13T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: BEARDER Catherine
committees/1/shadows
  • group: EPP name: PETIR Marijana
  • group: S&D name: MELIOR Susanne
  • group: GUE/NGL name: OMARJEE Younous
  • group: Verts/ALE name: TAYLOR Keith
  • group: ENF name: D'ORNANO Mireille
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ENVI/8/06475
New
ENVI/8/06099
activities/1/committees/3/date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
committees/3/date
2016-05-23T00:00:00
committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to propose EU action plan against trafficking in wildlife.

    BACKGROUND: wildlife trafficking – particularly in elephants and rhinos, corals, pangolins, tigers and great apes - has become one of the world's most profitable organised crimes. As an example, the illicit ivory trade has more than doubled since 2007, and is over three times greater than it was in 1998. Between 2007 and 2013, rhino poaching increased by 7000% in South Africa, endangering the very survival of this species. Sources estimate the profits from such trafficking at between EUR 8 and EUR 20 billion annually.

    The EU has an important role to play in tackling this traffic, as Europe is currently a destination market and a hub for trafficking in transit to other regions. It is also a region from which certain species are sourced for illegal trade.

    Numerous measures to combat wildlife trafficking have been adopted under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), a key international treaty regulating the international trade in wildlife, to which the EU became a party in 2015. The EU has already shown leadership in tackling the illegal trade in natural resources by adopting ambitious policies on timber and fishery products.

    The European Parliament called for an Action Plan in a resolution adopted in January 2014. The establishment of an EU Action Plan has also been supported by many EU Member States, international organisations, NGOs, and concerned businesses at a stakeholder consultation on the EU approach against wildlife trafficking, launched by the Commission in February 2014.

    CONTENT: the EU Action Plan demonstrates that the EU is ready to live up to international expectations and commitments, and that it is raising the level of its ambition as regards action against the illegal trade in wildlife. It is a major contribution towards the Sustainable Development Goals set under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development agreed by heads of state at a UN summit in September 2015.

    The EU Action Plan comprises a series of measures to be taken by EU institutions and/or Member States. It provides the impetus and framework for making better use of existing EU resources. The measures are essentially designed to improve cooperation between all the players concerned, make more effective use of existing tools and policies, and strengthen synergies between them, so that wildlife trafficking can be better tackled across the EU and globally.

    The measures, which are designed to address a complex problem holistically by involving all relevant organisations, are based on three priorities:

    1) Preventing wildlife trafficking and addressing its root causes:

    • reduce the demand for and the supply of illegal wildlife products, both within the EU and globally, by supporting specific campaigns and further limiting ivory trade within and from the EU ;
    • ensure that rural communities in source countries are more engaged in wildlife conservation, and that they benefit more from it;
    • engage more actively with relevant business sectors, ranging from those active in wildlife trade or using wildlife products to those that provide services to the trade;
    • take multilateral and bilateral measures to tackle corruption, a crucial enabling factor for wildlife trafficking throughout the enforcement chain.

    2) Implementing and enforcing existing rules and combating organised wildlife crime more effectively:

    • review shortcomings in implementation for all Member States, and develop strategies for tackling them, to ensure that existing rules are enforced more consistently across the EU;
    • strengthen the strategic aspect of checks and enforcement by setting enforcement priorities jointly and having Europol and Eurojust provide dedicated support for cross-border cases;
    • boost the capacity of all links in the enforcement chain and the judiciary to take effective action against wildlife trafficking in the EU. By improving inter-agency data flow and by sharing best practice at EU level;
    • ensure targeted awareness-raising amongst specialists on organised crime, cybercrime and money laundering;
    • ensure that Member States’ laws on organised crime cover wildlife trafficking and that appropriate penalties can be imposed for trafficking ;
    • improve international cooperation on enforcement through participation in international law enforcement operations, technical assistance and targeted financial support.

    3) Strengthening the global partnership of source, consumer and transit countries against wildlife trafficking:

    • take measures to step up funding to support developing countries in their efforts to combat wildlife trafficking;
    • use more efficiently the diplomatic tools of the EU and its Member States and other tools, notably EU trade policy, in relations with key source, transit and consumer countries and relevant regional organisations;
    • develop better tools to tackle the links between wildlife trafficking and security that exist in some regions;
    • use the existing multilateral processes, in international agreements and fora, to keep the issue on the global agenda.

    Monitoring and evaluation: the Action Plan covers the five years from 2016 to 2020. The Commission services and the EEAS will establish a scoreboard to monitor implementation. The Commission will report to the Council and the European Parliament by July 2018 on implementation of the action plan, Progress made and the success of the action plan in curbing wildlife trafficking will be evaluated in 2020. On that basis, the Commission will consider what further action is needed.

    The Action Plan will supersede Commission Recommendation No 2007/425/EC identifying a set of actions for the enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein.

activities/1/committees/4/date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas
committees/4/date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas
activities
  • date: 2016-02-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0087/COM_COM(2016)0087_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0087 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52016DC0087:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment Commissioner: VELLA Karmenu
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment commissioner: VELLA Karmenu
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ENVI/8/06475
reference
2016/2076(INI)
title
EU action plan against wildlife trafficking
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject