BETA


2016/2149(INI) Implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning national parliaments

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFCO RANGEL Paulo (icon: PPE PPE) BERÈS Pervenche (icon: S&D S&D), UJAZDOWSKI Kazimierz Michał (icon: ECR ECR), SELIMOVIC Jasenko (icon: ALDE ALDE), ANDERSSON Max (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CASTALDO Fabio Massimo (icon: EFDD EFDD), ANNEMANS Gerolf (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion INTA OBERMAYR Franz (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2018/04/19
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/04/19
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 518 votes to 50, with 46 abstentions, a resolution on the implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning national parliaments.

Members recalled that national parliaments improve and contribute actively to the good constitutional functioning of the European Union (Article 12 TEU), thereby playing an important role in its democratic legitimacy and realising it to the fullest extent.

Scrutinising governmental activity in European affairs : Members recognise that national governments are democratically accountable to national parliaments. Such accountability is the keystone of the role of national parliamentary chambers in the European Union. They encouraged national parliaments to fully exercise their European functions in order to directly influence and scrutinise the content of European policies, in particular via the monitoring of their national governments acting as members of the European Council and the Council.

Members noted that the European Parliament and national parliaments should be better involved in the European Semester and recommended that budgetary calendars at national and European level are better coordinated throughout the process in order to encourage more effective use of this instrument.

Creating a European public sphere : Parliament took note of the recent call for a series of democratic conventions across Europe. In this respect it considered that the establishment of an annual European week would allow Members and Commissioners to stand before all national parliamentary assemblies in order to discuss and explain the European agenda alongside together with national parliamentarians and representatives of civil society^.

Backing reform of the early warning system : Parliament underlined the fact that the EWS has seldom been used since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, and believed that it could be reformed within the current constitutional framework. It noted that examples such as the triggering of the ‘yellow card’ procedure against the Commission proposal on the revision of the Posting of Workers Directive in 2016 show that the EWS is operational and that the principle of subsidiarity is, on balance, respected within the EU.

Acknowledging the request by national parliaments to extend the eight-week period during which they can issue reasoned opinions, Members recalled that the current Treaty framework does not provide for such an extension. The Commission is called on to implement a technical notification period within the EWS in order to grant additional time between the date on which draft legislative acts are technically received by national parliamentary chambers and the date on which the eight-week period begins.

They also suggested, in line with the political dialogue launched by the Commission in 2016, the full use of the system whereby national parliaments can submit constructive proposals to the Commission with the aim of positively influencing the European debate and the Commission’s power of initiative.

According to Members, in the event of a future revision of the Treaties, the right of legislative initiative should be mainly accorded to the European Parliament, as the direct representative of EU citizens.

Implementing the right to information : Article 12 TEU and Protocol No 1 give national parliaments the right to receive information directly from the European institutions. Parliament is committed to promoting the use of the IPEX platform to strengthen political dialogue. It recommended recommends using IPEX as a channel for the systematic sharing of information and the early flagging of subsidiarity concerns .

Better interinstitutional cooperation : Parliament called for the existing cooperation between the European Parliament and national parliaments in COSAC, in the Interparliamentary Conference on Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP-IPC) to be developed on the basis of the principles of consensus, information-sharing and consultation. It called for simplification and harmonisation of the current framework for relations between the Union and national parliaments.

It pointed out that strengthening political and technical dialogue between parliamentary committees, both at national and at European level, would be a greatly productive step towards full interparliamentary cooperation. It considered the possibility of allocating additional resources to achieve this aim and the use of videoconferences where possible.

Lastly, it recommended that the national parliaments be fully involved in the further development of the common security and defence policy.

Documents
2018/04/19
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/04/18
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/03/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Paul RANGEL (EPP, PT) on the implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning national parliaments.

The report noted that national parliaments improve and contribute actively to the good constitutional functioning of the European Union (Article 12 TEU), thereby playing an important role in its democratic legitimacy and realising it to the fullest extent.

Scrutinising governmental activity in European affairs : Parliamentary accountability of national governments within the framework of European affairs, which depends on individual national practices, is the cornerstone of the role of national parliaments in the current European Treaty. In order to improve ownership, national parliaments should scrutinise national governments, in the same way as the European Parliament scrutinises the European executive. However, the level of influence of national parliaments over national governments varies significantly at Member State level.

The implementation of the right for national parliaments to scrutinise compliance with the principle of subsidiarity, on the basis of the so-called early warning system (EWS), has partially improved relations between the EU institutions and national parliaments. National parliaments are sometimes critical of the EWS, claiming that its provisions are not easy to put into practice and lack a broad scope of application. The eight-week period laid down in Article 4 of Protocol No 1 has proven to be inadequate for timely monitoring of compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.

Although interinstitutional cooperation improved after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, national parliaments occasionally raise grievances about their relations with the European Union, claiming that they are too complex.

The report noted that the European Parliament and national parliaments should be better involved in the European Semester and recommended that budgetary calendars at national and European level are better coordinated throughout the process in order to encourage more effective use of this instrument.

Backing reform of the early warning system : Members underlined the fact that the EWS has seldom been used since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, and believed that it could be reformed within the current constitutional framework. They noted that examples such as the triggering of the ‘yellow card’ procedure against the Commission proposal on the revision of the ‘Posting of Workers Directive’ in 2016 show that the EWS is operational and that the principle of subsidiarity is, on balance, respected within the EU.

Acknowledging the request by national parliaments to extend the eight-week period during which they can issue reasoned opinions, Members recalled that the current Treaty framework does not provide for such an extension. The Commission is called on to implement a technical notification period within the EWS in order to grant additional time between the date on which draft legislative acts are technically received by national parliamentary chambers and the date on which the eight-week period begins.

They also suggested, in line with the political dialogue launched by the Commission in 2016, the full use of the system whereby national parliaments can submit constructive proposals to the Commission with the aim of positively influencing the European debate and the Commission’s power of initiative.

According to Members, in the event of a future revision of the Treaties, the right of legislative initiative should be mainly accorded to the European Parliament, as the direct representative of EU citizens.

Implementing the right to information : while reaffirming that that Article 12 TEU and Protocol No 1 give national parliaments the right to receive information directly from the European institutions, Members stressed that national parliaments could better cope with the information sent to them either by virtue of the EWS, or under their right to information, if the IPEX platform was given the relevance of an Agora, or forum, for an informal permanent dialogue among national parliaments and between these and the European institutions. They resolved, therefore, to promote the use of the platform for the enhancement of political dialogue.

The report recommended that national parliaments use the IPEX platform in a timely fashion to ensure an early start to the national scrutiny mechanism.

Envisaging better interinstitutional cooperation : Members pointed out that strengthening political and technical dialogue between parliamentary committees, both at national and at European level, would be a greatly productive step towards full interparliamentary cooperation. They are considering the possibility of allocating additional resources to achieve this aim and the use of videoconferences where possible.

Members recommended that national parliaments be fully involved in the continuing development of the Common Security and Defence Policy.

Documents
2018/03/21
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/01/10
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/12/01
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/02/27
   EP - OBERMAYR Franz (ENF) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2016/09/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/09/03
   EP - RANGEL Paulo (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO

Documents

Votes

A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel - § 1 19/04/2018 12:30:04.000 #

2018/04/19 Outcome: +: 479, -: 112, 0: 25
DE IT ES FR RO BE SE AT NL PT BG CZ HU LT HR LV SK SI MT IE FI EE DK LU EL ?? PL CY GB
Total
83
60
40
62
27
19
18
18
23
18
13
17
13
10
10
7
9
6
6
10
7
5
9
3
15
1
43
4
58
icon: PPE PPE
183

Lithuania PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Greece PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
157

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
11

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

2

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
55

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel - § 14/2 19/04/2018 12:30:50.000 #

2018/04/19 Outcome: +: 393, -: 129, 0: 101
DE ES IT RO FR PT BG BE HU CZ SE HR AT SK MT LT IE FI SI NL LV LU EE PL CY DK EL ?? GB
Total
84
41
61
27
63
19
13
18
14
17
18
10
18
9
6
9
10
8
6
23
7
3
4
44
4
9
17
1
58
icon: PPE PPE
186

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

Abstain (1)

2
icon: S&D S&D
158

Bulgaria S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
55

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

2

NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

3

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

2

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
56

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1
3

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel - Am 8 19/04/2018 12:31:59.000 #

2018/04/19 Outcome: -: 479, +: 128, 0: 12
GB ?? PL DK IE LU LT LV CY EE NL FI SI MT SK HR EL BE AT HU BG CZ SE PT FR RO ES IT DE
Total
58
1
44
9
10
3
10
7
4
5
23
8
6
6
9
10
14
18
18
14
13
17
18
19
62
27
39
61
84
icon: ECR ECR
54

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

2

Italy ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30
2

Netherlands ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
10

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
158

Denmark S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Greece S&D

3

Hungary S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
185

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel - Considérant I/2 19/04/2018 12:32:51.000 #

2018/04/19 Outcome: +: 456, -: 115, 0: 47
DE IT FR ES RO BE PT SE BG CZ AT HU LT HR EL SK FI SI MT EE LV NL LU IE PL CY ?? DK GB
Total
84
60
61
39
27
18
19
18
13
16
18
15
10
10
16
9
8
6
6
5
7
23
3
10
44
4
1
9
58
icon: PPE PPE
185

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
156

Bulgaria S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: NI NI
12
3

Poland NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

3

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
28

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

2

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
54

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel - Considérant R 19/04/2018 12:34:35.000 #

2018/04/19 Outcome: +: 309, -: 273, 0: 34
DE ES FR BG SI HU EE BE FI HR LV LT LU SK IE AT SE EL MT CY ?? PT RO PL CZ NL DK IT GB
Total
83
39
60
13
6
15
5
18
8
10
7
10
3
9
10
18
18
15
6
4
1
19
27
43
17
23
9
61
57
icon: PPE PPE
184

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

France GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
28

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

3

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
53

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
157

Bulgaria S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Finland S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

3

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Poland S&D

Against (1)

2

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel - Résolution 19/04/2018 12:35:21.000 #

2018/04/19 Outcome: +: 518, -: 50, 0: 46
DE IT GB PL ES RO FR NL CZ BE AT BG PT HU LT HR SE SK FI DK LV SI MT EE EL IE LU ?? CY
Total
80
60
57
44
40
28
62
23
17
16
18
13
19
15
10
9
18
9
8
9
7
6
6
5
15
10
3
1
4
icon: PPE PPE
182

United Kingdom PPE

2

Belgium PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
156

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
53

Italy ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

3

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1