Activites

• 2017/10/25 Vote in plenary scheduled
• 2017/10/24 Debate in plenary scheduled
• 2017/10/05 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • A8-0291/2017
• 2017/09/25 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
• 2017/04/27 Results of vote in Parliament
  • Results of vote in Parliament
  • T8-0147/2017 summary

    The European Parliament decided by 603 votes to 14, with 15 abstentions, to postpone the decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2015. Parliament postponed the closure of the accounts for the Council and the European Council in accordance with Annex IV, Article 5 (1) (a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure. Parliament noted that in 2015, the European Council and the Council had an overall budget of EUR 541 791 500 (EUR 534 202 300 in 2014), with an implementation rate of 92.6 %. It also took note of the increase of EUR 7.6 million (+ 1.4 %) in the Council's budget for 2015. Systematic underspending: Parliament noted the publication by the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC) of the annual activity reports of the Legal Service, the Communication and Document Management and the Administration directors-general on under spending and called for key performance indicators to be put in place to improve the budgetary planning. Moreover, Parliament is still concerned about the very high amount of appropriations being carried over from 2015 to 2016 particularly those on property, plant and equipment. It reiterated that the budget of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions. Human resources: Parliament stressed that the geographical balance, namely the relationship between staff nationality and the size of Member States, should still remain an important element of resources management particularly with respect to the Member States that have acceded to the Union since 2004. It regretted the fact that Member States which acceded to the Union in 2004 or after are still under-represented at the higher level of administration and in managerial posts, for which progress is still awaited. Building policy: Parliament expressed concern at the delivery delay of the Europa building and asked for the Council's building policy to be provided to the discharge authority. It reminded the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date. Council/European Council discharge procedure: state of play: Parliament once again noted the lack of transparency which has characterised Parliament's information on the discharge procedure concerning the Council and the European Council and noted that they ought to be transparent and fully accountable to Union citizens for the funds entrusted to it as a Union institution. The Council must take part fully and in good faith in the annual discharge procedure, just as the other institutions do. In this regard, Parliament considered that effective supervision of the Union's budget implementation requires cooperation between Parliament and the Council through a working arrangement. It deeply regretted the difficulties encountered in the discharge procedures to date. As with previous years, it insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and pointed out that the basics of such scrutiny have been laid down in its discharge resolutions of the past years. It hoped for a much improved cooperation with the Council’s secretary-general for whom the year 2015 was the first year he took on these new responsibilities. Towards improved cooperation: Members stated that the Parliament and the Council should show greater goodwill on both sides. They recalled Parliament’s power to grant discharge pursuant to Articles 316, 317 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Articles 164 to 167 of the Financial Regulation, and affirmed that granting or not granting discharge is a duty that Parliament has towards the Union citizens. Parliament recalled that each of the institutions, as defined in Article 2(b) of the Financial Regulation, is autonomous in implementing its own section of the budget given its budgetary autonomy laid down in Article 55 of that Regulation. Parliament grants discharge to each institution individually. In this regard, Parliament considered that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure can be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.

• 2017/04/26 Debate in Parliament
  • Debate in Parliament
• 2017/03/30 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • A8-0131/2017 summary

    The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Bart STAES (Greens/EFA, BE) in which it called on the European Parliament to postpone its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2015. Members noted that in 2015, the European Council and the Council had an overall budget of EUR 541 791 500 (EUR 534 202 300 in 2014), with an implementation rate of 92.6 %. They also took note of the increase of EUR 7.6 million (+ 1.4 %) in the Council's budget for 2015. Systematic underspending: Members noted the publication by the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC) of the annual activity reports of the Legal Service, the Communication and Document Management and the Administration directors-general on under spending and called for key performance indicators to be put in place to improve the budgetary planning. Moreover, Members are still concerned about the very high amount of appropriations being carried over from 2015 to 2016 particularly those on property, plant and equipment. They reiterated that the budget of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions. Building policy: Members expressed concern at the delivery delay of the Europa building and asked for the Council's building policy to be provided to the discharge authority. They reminded the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date. State of play: Members once again noted the lack of transparency which has characterised Parliament's information on the discharge procedure concerning the Council and the European Council and noted that they ought to be transparent and fully accountable to Union citizens for the funds entrusted to it as a Union institution. The Council must take part fully and in good faith in the annual discharge procedure, just as the other institutions do. In this regard, they considered that effective supervision of the Union's budget implementation requires cooperation between Parliament and the Council through a working arrangement. They deeply regretted the difficulties encountered in the discharge procedures to date. As with previous years, Members insisted that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and pointed out that the basics of such scrutiny have been laid down in its discharge resolutions of the past years. They hoped for a much improved cooperation with the Council’s secretary-general for whom the year 2015 was the first year he took on these new responsibilities. Towards improved cooperation: Members stated that the Parliament and the Council should show greater goodwill on both sides. They recalled Parliament’s power to grant discharge pursuant to Articles 316, 317 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Articles 164 to 167 of the Financial Regulation, and affirmed that granting or not granting discharge is a duty that Parliament has towards the Union citizens. Members recalled that each of the institutions, as defined in Article 2(b) of the Financial Regulation, is autonomous in implementing its own section of the budget given its budgetary autonomy laid down in Article 55 of that Regulation. Parliament grants discharge to each institution individually. In this regard, Members considered that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure can be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union.

• 2017/03/22 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
• 2016/10/04 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
• 2016/07/11 Non-legislative basic document published
  • COM(2016)0475 summary

    PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Council and Council. Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2015 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 148(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. (1) Governance and budgetary principles: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies. The main institutions in the sense of being responsible for drafting policies and taking decisions are the EP, the European Council, the Council and the Commission. The EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), the Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field. The budget is prepared by the Commission and usually agreed in mid-December by the Parliament and the Council, based on the procedure of Art. 314 TFEU. According to the principle of budget equilibrium, the total revenue must equal total expenditure (payment appropriations) for a given financial year. EU revenues: the EU has two main categories of funding: own resources revenues and sundry revenues. Own resources can be divided into traditional own resources (such as custom levies), the own resource based on value added tax (VAT) and the resource based on gross national income (GNI). Sundry revenues arising from the activities of the EU (e.g. competition fines) normally represent less than 10 % of total revenue. Own resources revenue make up the vast majority of EU funding. Expenditure of the EU institutions: the EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows: Direct management: the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management: the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies. Shared management: under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions. Consolidated annual accounts of the EU: this Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective. It also presents the accounting principles applicable to the European budget (in particular, consolidation). The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management. Audit and discharge: the EU’s annual accounts and resource management are audited by the European Court of Auditors, its external auditor, which as part of its activities draws up for the European Parliament and the Council: an annual report on the activities financed from the general budget, detailing its observations on the annual accounts and underlying transactions; an opinion, based on its audits and given in the annual report in the form of a statement of assurance, on (i) the reliability of the accounts and (ii) the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions involving both revenue collected from taxable persons and payments to final beneficiaries. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. This discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement; (iii) or the refusal of the discharge. The document also presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements. (2) Implementation of the European Council/Council’s appropriations for the financial year 2015: the document comprises a series of annexes, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. As regards the budget implementation of the European Council/Council, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution shows that the total payment appropriations totalled EUR 639 million, with an 82.43% implementation rate.

  • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en', 'title': 'Budget'}, GEORGIEVA Kristalina

Documents

• Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2016)0475
• Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0131/2017
• Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
• Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
• Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T8-0147/2017
• Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0291/2017

Amendments

Dossier

23

2016/2153(DEC) 2017/03/07 CONT 6 amendments... Amendment 1 # Tamás DEUTSCH Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Emphasises that geographical balance, namely the relationship between staff nationality and the size of Member States, should still remain an important element of resources management particularly with respect to the Member States that have acceded to the Union since 2004; welcomes the fact that the European Council and the Council have reached an overall balanced composition of officials from the Member States which joined the European Union before and since 2004, but points out that these Member States are still underrepresented at the higher level of administration and in managerial posts for which progress is still awaited; Amendment 2 # Petri SARVAMAA Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the existence of a gender balance policy in the GSC; welcomes the positive trend of women’s representationgender balance in management; calls on the Council, however, to further strengthen the gender balanceits efforts pointing to the fact that female representationthe level of gender balance in the management posts still reached only 30 % / 70 % by the end of 2015; Amendment 3 # Tamás DEUTSCH Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Reiterates its call for the institution's building policy to be provided to the discharge authority; reminds the Council of Parliament's call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date; Amendment 4 # Tamás DEUTSCH Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Insists that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and points out that the basics of such scrutiny have been laid down in its discharge resolutions of the past years; Amendment 5 # Marian-Jean MARINESCU Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Regrets the failure in the past to grant the discharge due to insufficient cooperation between Parliament and the Council; notes that there would appear to be greater good will on both sides and expresses optimism that progress will be made with a view to improving cooperation in the future, something that will improve the image of Parliament and the Council for the public at large; calls on Parliament and the Council to continue along this path; Amendment 6 # Tamás DEUTSCH Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Considers that satisfactory cooperation between Parliament, the European Council and the Council as a result of an open and formal dialogue procedure can be a positive sign to be sent to the citizens of the Union. source: 600.916 2017/09/14 CONT 17 amendments... Amendment 1 # Notis MARIAS Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants/Refuses to grant the Secretary- General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2015; Amendment 10 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates its call for progress reports on building projects and a detailed breakdown of the costs incurred to date; calls forurges that information be provided on the costs related to the delayed completion of the Europa building; Amendment 11 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that new ethics guidelines for the Council were published in 2015 and are to be followed up by awareness-raising activities on ethics and integrity; regrets that the Council’s whistleblowing rules continue to be publicly unavailable; Amendment 12 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. WelcomNotes the improvements made by the Council with regard to corporate policies, particularly transparency; however regrets that the Council has not yet joined the Union transparency register; Amendment 13 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Reiterates its call onUrges the Council to develop detailed anti-corruption guidelines and independent policies within its structures; Amendment 14 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Regrets the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date, which were due to a lack of cooperation from the Councillack of cooperation from the Council in respect of the discharge procedure; points out that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 for the reasons set out in its resolutions of 10 May 20118, 25 October 20119, 10 May 201210, 23 October 201211, 17 April 201312, 9 October 201313, 3 April 201414, 23 October 201415, 29 April 201516, 27 October 201517, 28 April 201618and 27 October 201619and postponed its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in relation to the financial year 2015 for the reasons set out in its resolution of 27 April 2017; _________________ 8 OJ L 250, 27.9.2011, p. 25. 9 OJ L 313, 26.11.2011, p. 13. 10 OJ L 286, 17.10.2012, p. 23. 11 OJ L 350, 20.12.2012, p. 71. 12 OJ L 308, 16.11.2013, p. 22. 13 OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 97. 14 OJ L 266, 5.9.2014, p. 26. 15 OJ L 334, 21.11.2014, p. 95. 16 OJ L 255, 30.9.2015, p. 22. 17 OJ L 314, 1.12.2015, p. 49. 18 OJ L 246, 14.9.2016, p. 21. 19 OJ L 333, 8.12.2016, p. 51. Amendment 15 # Marco VALLI, Laura AGEA Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Notes that failure to grant discharge has not led to consequences of any kind; considers that the situation should nevertheless be resolved as rapidly as possible, principally in the interests of the citizens of the Union; Amendment 16 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Reminds the Council of the Commission's view, expressed in January 2014, that all institutions should be fully part of the follow-up process to the observations made by Parliament in the discharge exercise and that all institutions should cooperate to ensure the smooth functioning of the discharge procedure; Amendment 17 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets deeply that the Council continues to fail to provide answers to Parliament's questions; Amendment 2 # Marco VALLI, Laura AGEA Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the European Parliament is the only body directly elected by the citizens of the Union, Amendment 3 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls the Parliament's major role specified in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and in the Financial Regulation in respect of the budget discharge; Amendment 4 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes the catalytic role of Parliament and of other institutions within the discharge procedure, as governed by the provisions of the Financial Regulation, in particular Articles 162 to 166 thereof; Amendment 5 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that the Council continues to beis remaining silent in relation to the remarks made by Parliament in its discharge resolution of 27 April 20177 on the trend from previous years; _________________ 7 Texts adopted of that date, P8_TA(2017)0147. Amendment 6 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes with satisfaction that, for the first time the Council provided the Parliament the 2015 annual activity reports (AAR) of the Directorate General for Administration, of the Legal Service and of the Directorate General for Communication and Document Management; notes that the remaining directorates do not have authorising officers by delegation that implement the Union budget Section II EC/C; Amendment 7 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Regrets that the budget of the European Council and the Council have not yet been separated, as recommended by Parliament in recent discharge resolutions; Amendment 8 # Notis MARIAS Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. NotesRegrets that that the information on the Council’s building policy provided on its website does not include details about the costs incurred in relation to those buildings; is aware that occasionally information is exchanged between the building departments of both institutions; proposurges that that exchange becomes frequent and that detailed information be given to Parliament in the Council’s annual financial report; Amendment 9 # Marco VALLI, Laura AGEA Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that the information on the Council’s building policy provided on its website does not include details about the costs incurred in relation to those buildings; is aware that occasionally information is exchanged between the building departments of both institutions; proposes that that exchange becomes regular frequent and that detailed information be given to Parliament in the Council’s annual financial report; source: 610.672

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)