Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | AYALA SENDER Inés ( S&D) | ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( PPE), FITTO Raffaele ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), JÁVOR Benedek ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | JEŽEK Petr ( ALDE) | Monica MACOVEI ( ECR), Barbara SPINELLI ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to EUROJUST in respect of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2015.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2017/1714 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of Eurojust for the financial year 2015.
CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to EUROJUST’s Administrative Director for the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2015.
This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 27 April 2017 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27 April 2017).
Amongst Parliament’s main observations in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, it regretted that Eurojust faced budgetary availability issues due to known structural problems with its funding and that for the second successive year was forced to resort to mitigation measures subject to an amending budget. It also regretted that the financial uncertainty with which Eurojust was confronted required the postponement of some of its ongoing activities and the deferral of valuable technological developments.
Parliament called on Eurojust and the Commission to solve these known structural problems and secure a proper level of funding for the coming years.
Eurojust is currently in the process of preparing for the transition to its new premises. Construction started in spring 2015 and the expected move was planned for spring 2017. Eurojust should report further to the discharge authority on the transition to its new premises, as well as to outline total incurred transition costs.
Lastly, regretting that in its 2015 annual report, Eurojust stated that corruption is not a Union priority, Parliament noted that this statement was contradicted by the 90 corruption cases for which Eurojust expertise was requested in 2015 (twice as many as in 2014) according to the Eurojust annual report. Greece, Romania and Croatia were the Member States to request the most assistance in corruption-related cases.
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Administrative Director of the budget of Eurojust in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2015.
The vote on the decision on discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex IV, Article 5 (1)(a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure).
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of Eurojust for the financial year 2015 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 503 votes to 96 with 16 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies .
These recommendations may be summarised as follows:
Eurojust’s financial statements : Parliament noted that Eurojust’s final budget for the financial year 2015 was EUR 33 818 351 entirely derived from the Union budget. Budget and financial management : It also noted that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year of 2015 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.99 %, representing an increase of 0.17 % from 2014. Parliament regretted that Eurojust faced budgetary availability issues due to known structural problems with its funding and that for the second successive year was forced to resort to mitigation measures subject to an amending budget . It equally regretted that the financial uncertainty with which Eurojust was confronted required the postponement of some of its on-going activities and the deferral of valuable technological developments and called on Eurojust and the Commission to solve these known structural problems and secure a proper level of funding for the coming years.
Parliament made a series of observations regarding commitment and carry-overs, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, procurement and recruitment procedures and internal audits and controls.
Eurojust’s seat : Parliament acknowledged that Eurojust is currently, together with its host Member State, in the process of preparing for the transition to its new premises. It noted that the construction of the premises started in spring 2015 and the expected move was planned for spring 2017. It invited Eurojust to report further to the discharge authority on the transition to its new premises, as well as to outline total incurred transition costs.
Eurojust’s priority actions : Parliament regretted that in its 2015 annual report, Eurojust stated that corruption is not a Union priority . Parliament encouraged Eurojust to continue to treat terrorism, trafficking and smuggling, and cybercrime as priorities.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Inés AYALA SENDER (S&D, ES) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust) for the financial year 2015.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Administrative Director of Eurojust discharge in respect of the implementation of Eurojust’s budget for the financial year 2015.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of Eurojust for the financial year 2015 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of its accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Eurojust’s financial statements : Members noted that Eurojust’s final budget for the financial year 2015 was EUR 33 818 351 entirely derived from the Union budget. Budget and financial management : Members also noted that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year of 2015 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.99 %, representing an increase of 0.17 % from 2014. They regretted that Eurojust faced budgetary availability issues due to known structural problems with its funding and that for the second successive year was forced to resort to mitigation measures subject to an amending budget . They equally regretted that the financial uncertainty with which Eurojust was confronted required the postponement of some of its on-going activities and the deferral of valuable technological developments and called on Eurojust and the Commission to solve these known structural problems and secure a proper level of funding for the coming years.
Members also made a series of observations regarding commitment and carry-overs, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, procurement and recruitment procedures and internal audits and controls.
Members acknowledged that Eurojust is currently, together with its host Member State, in the process of preparing for the transition to its new premises. They noted that the construction of the premises started in spring 2015 and the expected move was planned for spring 2017. They invited Eurojust to report further to the discharge authority on the transition to its new premises, as well as to outline total incurred transition costs.
Lastly, they regretted that in its 2015 annual report, Eurojust stated that corruption is not a Union priority .
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2015 and the balance sheet at 31 December 2015 of the European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of Eurojust for the financial year 2015, accompanied by Eurojust's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Administrative Director of Eurojust in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2015.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that Eurojust's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of Eurojust's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2015 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, the Council made some observations:
carry-overs : the Council noted that a high level of commitment appropriations was carried over to 2016. It encouraged Eurojust to continue improving its financial programming and monitoring of the budget implementation, in order to reduce the level of commitments carried over to the following financial year to the minimum strictly necessary; salary adjustments : the Council took note of the corrective measures taken by Eurojust so far following the non-budgetisation of the salary adjustments for the financial year 2014, and called on Eurojust to complete them without delay.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of Eurojust for the financial year 2015, together with the Eurojust’s replies.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of Eurojust. In brief, Eurojust’s objective is to improve the coordination of cross-border investigations and prosecutions between the Member States of the European Union, and between Member States and non-Member States.
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of Eurojust, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2015, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, Eurojust’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2015 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report also makes a series of observations on Eurojust’s budgetary and financial management, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s observations :
budgetary management : the Court stated that the level of committed appropriations carried over is high for administrative expenditure at EUR 1.6 million, i.e. 21 %. These carry-overs are mainly related to specific contracts for security and hospitality services and for ICT projects, hardware and maintenance as well as consultancy and project costs for the new premises, whereby EUR 500 000 were committed late in the year, mostly for services to be provided in 2016.
Eurojust’s replies :
budgetary management : Eurojust accepts the fact that carry-overs to 2016 are relatively high and stated that it shall remain vigilant to avoid any unjustified carry-overs, which are not the direct result of the ongoing security requirements and operational expenses.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report contains a summary of the Eurojust’s key figures in 2015 :
Budget : EUR 34 million. Staff : 246 including officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of Eurojust.
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies .
Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cashflows of the EU institutions and bodies, including Eurojust, with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including Eurojust.
Eurojust : Eurojust which is located in The Hague (NL), was set up by Council Decision 2002/187/JHA with a view to stepping up the fight against serious organised crime and to improve cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States, in particular by facilitating the execution of international mutual legal assistance and the implementation of extradition requests.
As regards Eurojust’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 34 million;
- paid : EUR 34 million;
- carried over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 38 million;
- paid : EUR 34 million;
- carried over : EUR 4 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of Eurojust .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of Eurojust.
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies .
Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cashflows of the EU institutions and bodies, including Eurojust, with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including Eurojust.
Eurojust : Eurojust which is located in The Hague (NL), was set up by Council Decision 2002/187/JHA with a view to stepping up the fight against serious organised crime and to improve cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States, in particular by facilitating the execution of international mutual legal assistance and the implementation of extradition requests.
As regards Eurojust’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 34 million;
- paid : EUR 34 million;
- carried over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 38 million;
- paid : EUR 34 million;
- carried over : EUR 4 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of Eurojust .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0183/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0129/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE600.894
- Committee opinion: PE595.376
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05873/2017
- Committee draft report: PE593.876
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 449 01.12.2016, p. 0193
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0135/2016
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex COM(2016)0475
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 449 01.12.2016, p. 0193 N8-0135/2016
- Committee draft report: PE593.876
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05873/2017
- Committee opinion: PE595.376
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE600.894
Votes
A8-0129/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
24 |
2016/2170(DEC)
2017/01/20
LIBE
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets that Eurojust faced budgetary availability issues due to known structural problems with its funding; stresses that for the second successive year, Eurojust was forced to resort to mitigation measures subject to an amending budget; regrets that the financial uncertainty with which Eurojust was confronted required the postponement of some of its on-going activities and the deferral of valuable technological developments; requests that Eurojust and the Commission solve these known structural problems and secure a proper level of regular funding for the coming years;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the high level of committed appropriations carried over for administrative expenditure (21 %); acknowledges that this was mainly the outcome of budgetary uncertainty;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Regrets that the administration and the members of the independent Joint Supervisory Body did not publish their declarations of interest; calls for the immediate publication of these declarations; calls upon Eurojust to adopt a practical guide on institutional management and one on conflicts of interest, according to the guidelines published by the Commission on December 2013 and to establish clear rules against "revolving doors"; reminds Eurojust to adopt internal binding rules for the protection of whistle-blowers, in accordance with Article 22c of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, which came into force on 1 January 2014.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages Eurojust to continue to treat terrorism, irregular migration and cybercrime as priorities;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages Eurojust to continue to treat terrorism, irregular migration and cybercrime as priorities; welcomes the fact that Member States increasingly made use of coordination meetings and coordination centres and that they value the increased involvement of third countries in joint investigation teams;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages Eurojust to continue to treat terrorism
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Regrets that in its 2015 annual report, Eurojust stated that corruption is not among EU priorities; notes that this statement was contradicted by the 90 corruption cases for which Eurojust expertise was requested in 2015 (twice as much as in 2014) according to the Eurojust annual report; acknowledges that Greece, Romania and Croatia were the most requesting Member States in corruption related cases;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that the Court of Auditors' report for the financial year 2010 identified an overlap of responsibilities between the Administrative Director and the College of Eurojust, currently resulting from the Council Decision 2002/187/JHA1a ; regrets that no corrective measures have been taken since then; calls on the Parliament and the Council to address this issue in the negotiations on the new Eurojust regulation; _________________ 1aCouncil Decision 2002/184/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (OJ L 063, 6.3.2002, p.1).
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets that Eurojust faced budgetary availability issues due to known structural problems with its funding;
source: 597.591
2017/03/07
CONT
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Administrative Director of Eurojust discharge in respect of the implementation of Eurojust’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes with concern a significant gender imbalance both in Eurojust’s senior management and
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 2 Paragraph 1 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of Eurojust for the financial year
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas in the context of the discharge procedure, Parliament stresses the special importance of further strengthening the democratic legitimacy of the institutions of the Union by improving transparency and accountability, implementing the concept of performance based budgeting and good governance of human resources;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Regrets that Eurojust faced budgetary availability issues and that for the second successive year Eurojust was forced to resort to mitigation measures subject to an amending budget; regrets that the financial uncertainty with which Eurojust was confronted required the postponement of some of its on-going activities and the deferral of valuable technological developments; requests that Eurojust and the Commission solve these known structural problems and secure a proper level of funding for the coming years;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls on the Eurojust to keep the volume to be carried over to the next year as low as possible;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes with concern that Eurojust has not foreseen any check or updating of the declarations of interest of experts, members of the College and staff members; notes that this practice does not further transparency and calls for the declarations to be checked and updated;
source: 600.894
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2016-07-12T00:00:00New
2016-07-11T00:00:00 |
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.876New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-593876_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE595.376&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-595376_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE600.894New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-600894_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0129&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0129_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0183New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0183_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/07469New
|
procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0308New
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0308 |
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOC |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
2015 discharge: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust)New
2015 discharge: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust) |
activities/6 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5/docs/0 |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):ENNew
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016DC0475:ENNew
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):EN |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2017-04-27T00:00:00New
2016-07-12T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2017-03-22T00:00:00New
2016-07-12T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2017-03-23T00:00:00New
2017-03-22T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
committees/0/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
committees/0/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2016-10-04T00:00:00New
2017-03-23T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
committees/1/date |
2016-10-12T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/07469
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|