Progress: Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | CONT |
AYALA SENDER Inés ( S&D)
|
ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( PPE),
FITTO Raffaele ( ECR),
ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE),
JÁVOR Benedek ( Verts/ALE),
VALLI Marco ( EFDD),
KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF)
|
| Committee Opinion | LIBE |
JEŽEK Petr ( ALDE)
|
Monica MACOVEI ( ECR),
Barbara SPINELLI ( GUE/NGL)
|
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Police College (CEPOL) for the financial year 2015.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2017/1645 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police College (now European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training) (CEPOL) for the financial year 2015.
CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2015.
This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 27 April 2017 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27 April 2017).
Amongst Parliament’s main observations in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, the latter deplored the fact that, despite the adoption of the College's policy on the prevention and management of conflict of interests in November 2014, the curricula vitae and declarations of interest of its experts are not published on the College's website. It also called upon the College to adopt a clear and solid whistleblowing strategy and rules against ‘revolving doors’.
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2015.
The vote on the decision on discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex IV, Article 5 (1) (a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure).
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2015 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 502 votes to 108 with 13 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies .
These recommendations may be summarised as follows:
Agency’s financial statements : Parliament noted that the final budget of the Agency for the financial year 2015 was EUR 8 471 000, representing an increase of 1.22 % compared to 2014. Commitments and carry-overs : It noted that, following the signature of the grant agreement with the Commission on the EU/MENA Counter-Terrorism Training Partnership, a budget of EUR 2.5 million was agreed, out of which EUR 300 000 was inscribed in the Agency’s budget as assigned revenue in 2015 with the remaining EUR 2.2 million being transferred during 2016 and 2017. It requested a thorough evaluation of this project and its added value for the security of the Union, and if beneficial, requests the continuation and extension of the project in the coming years. Relocation of the Agency to Hungary : Parliament noted that the cost of the relocation from Bramshill, UK to Budapest, Hungary was estimated at approximately EUR 1 006 515, to be spent during 2014 and 2015. It noted moreover that in accordance with the agreement between the Commission and the UK, the amount of EUR 570 283 was financed with 50 % from the UK authorities and with 50 % from the Commission. It acknowledged the fact that the UK contribution to the relocation funds was inscribed in the Agency’s budget as assigned revenue, which was fully used. It welcomed the fact that the remaining relocation funds corresponding to 35 % of the final relocation budget were financed with the Agency’s budget by savings deriving from the lower correction coefficient applied to staff entitlements in Hungary . A number of staff members initiated a legal dispute against the Agency concerning the conditions in which the relocation had been carried out and its financial impact on their income. Members acknowledged that the final amount for the cost of relocation needs to cover the financial obligation arising from the Court’s judgement and invites the Agency to report on the outcome and the final financial figure of the relocation.
Parliament also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls.
On performance , Parliament stated that in 2015 the Agency’s training portfolio encompassed 151 training activities, including 85 residential activities and 66 webinars, 428 exchanges in the framework of the European Police Exchange Programme (EPEP), 24 online modules, one online course, and nine common curricula. It noted with satisfaction that for the fifth year in a row the outreach of the Agency has increased, resulting in the Agency training 12 992 law enforcement professionals in 2015 compared to 10 322 in 2014.
Parliament welcomed that in 2015 the Agency organised webinars to provide law enforcement officials with up-to-date information and best practice on identifying and investigating hate crimes and different forms of gender-based violence , and offered trainings to raise awareness about the challenges experienced by Roma communities and LGBTI persons (such as over- and under-policing and the lack of trust towards members of the police force).
Lastly, Parliament noted that, with regard to the Agency’s expanded responsibilities and increased mandate, the current resource levels are insufficient . There is a significant need for reinforcement in both human and financial resources. Therefore, the Commission is called upon to take this into account in its budget proposals for the Agency.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Inés AYALA SENDER (S&D, ES) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police College for the financial year 2015.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Director of the College discharge in respect of the implementation of the College’s budget for the financial year 2015.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the College for the financial year 2015 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the College’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
College’s financial statements : Members noted that the final budget of the European Police College for the financial year 2015 was EUR 8 471 000, representing an increase of 1.22 % compared to 2014. Commitments and carry-overs : Members noted that, following the signature of the grant agreement with the Commission on the EU/MENA Counter-Terrorism Training Partnership, a budget of EUR 2.5 million was agreed, out of which EUR 300 000 was inscribed in the College’s budget as assigned revenue in 2015 with the remaining EUR 2.2 million being transferred during 2016 and 2017. They requested a thorough evaluation of this project and its added value for the security of the Union, and if beneficial, requests the continuation and extension of the project in the coming years. Relocation of CEPOL to Hungary : Members noted that the cost of the relocation from Bramshill, UK to Budapest, Hungary was estimated at approximately EUR 1 006 515, to be spent during 2014 and 2015. They noted moreover that in accordance with the agreement between the Commission and the UK, the amount of EUR 570 283 was financed with 50 % from the UK authorities and with 50 % from the Commission. They acknowledged the fact that the UK contribution to the relocation funds was inscribed in the College’s budget as assigned revenue, which was fully used. They welcomed the fact that the remaining relocation funds corresponding to 35 % of the final relocation budget were financed with the College’s budget by savings deriving from the lower correction coefficient applied to staff entitlements in Hungary . A number of staff members initiated a legal dispute against the College concerning the conditions in which the relocation had been carried out and its financial impact on their income. Members acknowledged that the final amount for the cost of relocation needs to cover the financial obligation arising from the Court’s judgement and invites the College to report on the outcome and the final financial figure of the relocation.
Members also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, transfers, procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls.
On performance , Members stated that in 2015 the College’s training portfolio encompassed 151 training activities, including 85 residential activities and 66 webinars, 428 exchanges in the framework of the European Police Exchange Programme (EPEP), 24 online modules, one online course, and nine common curricula. They noted with satisfaction that for the fifth year in a row the outreach of the College has increased, resulting in the College training 12 992 law enforcement professionals in 2015 compared to 10 322 in 2014.
Lastly, Members noted that, with regard to the College’s expanded responsibilities and increased mandate, the current resource levels are insufficient. There is a significant need for reinforcement in both human and financial resources. Therefore, the Commission is called upon to take this into account in its budget proposals for the College.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2015 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2015 of the European Police College (CEPOL), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2015, accompanied by the Agency's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2015.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Agency's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Agency's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2015 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, some observations were made:
budget implementation : the Council invited the Agency to strengthen the agencies' budget reporting; relocation : while acknowledging the particular impact of the Agency's relocation from the United Kingdom to Hungary, the Council noted that, again, a high level of commitment appropriations was carried over to 2016. It encouraged the Agency to continue improving its financial programming and monitoring of the budget implementation, in order to reduce the level of commitments carried over to the following financial year to the minimum strictly necessary.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL) for the financial year 2015, together with the College’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit focused on the annual accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL). The College’s task is to function as a network and bring together the national police training institutes in the Member States to provide training sessions, based on common standards, for senior police officers.
Statement of Assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the College, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2015; the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the College’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : the Court considers that the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2015 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report made a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the College, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s observations :
budgetary management : the Court stated that the level of committed appropriations carried over was high for administrative expenditure at EUR 212 456 mainly due to the College’s relocation from the UK to Hungary in September 2014 and the consequential need to initiate new service and supply contracts. Most of the services procured under these annual contracts had not been provided by the end of 2015.
CEPOL’s reply :
budgetary management : the College stated that the carry-over rate for administrative expenditure is high but justified having in view the contract renewals or pending invoices at the end of year. CEPOL improved its budget management and commits to further maintain compliance with the budgetary principle of annuality provided in the Financial Regulation. It should also be noted that CEPOL has outsourced the role of Accounting Officer to the Accounting Officer of the European Commission.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report also contained a summary of the College’s key figures in 2015 :
Budget : EUR 8.8 million (in payment appropriations). Staff : 45 including officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies . Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Police College (CEPOL), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including CEPOL.
CEPOL : CEPOL which is located in Budapest (HU) since October 2014 was established by Council Decision 2005/681/JHA . Its main task is to provide training sessions, based on common standards, for senior police officers.
As regards CEPOL’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 9 million;
- paid : EUR 9 million;
- carried-over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 10 million;
- paid : EUR 8 million;
- carried-over : EUR 2 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of CEPOL .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies . Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Police College (CEPOL), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including CEPOL.
CEPOL : CEPOL which is located in Budapest (HU) since October 2014 was established by Council Decision 2005/681/JHA . Its main task is to provide training sessions, based on common standards, for senior police officers.
As regards CEPOL’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 9 million;
- paid : EUR 9 million;
- carried-over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 10 million;
- paid : EUR 8 million;
- carried-over : EUR 2 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of CEPOL .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0160/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0081/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE599.870
- Committee opinion: PE595.383
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05873/2017
- Committee draft report: PE593.870
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 449 01.12.2016, p. 0036
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0110/2016
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex COM(2016)0475
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 449 01.12.2016, p. 0036 N8-0110/2016
- Committee draft report: PE593.870
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05873/2017
- Committee opinion: PE595.383
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE599.870
Votes
A8-0081/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender - Résolution #
NI| Amendments | Dossier |
| 32 |
2016/2178(DEC)
2017/01/23
LIBE
22 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the solid output of CEPOL; acknowledges the training of 12 992 law enforcement officers, which represents an increase of over 25% in comparison with 2014; welcomes the very high level of satisfaction of training participants, which reached 93% for residential courses, 94% for webinars and 94% for European Police Exchange Programmes; acknowledges that the number of residential activities (85) exceeded the target
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes that in 2015 the Agency organised webinars to provide law enforcement officials with up-to-date information and best practice on identifying and investigating hate crimes and different forms of gender-based violence, and offered trainings to raise awareness about the challenges experienced by Roma communities and LGBTI persons (such as over- and under- policing and the lack of trust towards members of the police force), and how these can be addressed at the level of law enforcement; calls for the continuation of the provision of trainings in the field of fundamental rights and the related sensitisation of the police force.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes the European Commission grant of 2 500 000 euros to implement a counter-terrorism training capacity building project in four countries in the MENA region; requests a thorough evaluation of the project and its added value for the security of the Union
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes the European Commission grant of 2 500 000 euros to implement a counter-terrorism training capacity building project in four countries in the MENA region; requests a thorough evaluation of the project and its added value for the security of the Union
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes the European Commission grant of 2 500 000 euros to implement a counter-terrorism training capacity building project in four countries in the MENA region; requests a thorough evaluation of the project and its added value for the security of the Union
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the high implementation rate of the 2015 budget that reached 95.5% out of which 79% has been paid; notes, however, that according to the Court of Auditors, the level of committed appropriations for administrative expenditure carried over from 2014 to 2015 reached 49 % at the end of 2015, which is relatively high, although lower than in 2014 (59%); underlines that the Court noted that the College's audited budgetary implementation report differs from the level of detail provided by most other agencies which demonstrates the need for clear guidelines on the agencies' budget reporting; welcomes, therefore, the commitment of CEPOL to continue to improve its budget management procedures and to better comply with the budgetary principle of annuity provided in the Financial Regulation;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Deplores that, despite the adoption of CEPOL's policy on the prevention and management of conflict of interests in November 2014, the curricula vitae and declarations of interest of its experts are not published on CEPOL's website; reminds CEPOL that it should make them available for the public in order to ensure transparency and uphold EU citizen's trust in the European institutions; calls upon CEPOL to adopt a clear and solid whistleblowing strategy and rules against "revolving doors" according to Article 22c of the EU Staff Regulations, which came into force on 1 January 2014;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Regrets that given the withdrawal of the UK and the impending loss of the UK's contribution, the Agency has not been dissolved in an effort to balance the budget without having to resort to raising additional revenues ;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Regrets that CEPOL has neither been merged with EUROPOL nor co- located in an effort to reduce the degree of waste of taxpayers' money
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the high implementation rate of the 2015 budget that reached 95.5% out of which 79% has been paid; notes, however, that according to the Court of Auditors, the level of committed appropriations for administrative expenditure carried over from 2014 to 2015 reached 49 % at the end of 2015, which is relatively high, although lower than in 2014 (59%); understands that this is a direct result of the College's relocation from the UK to Hungary in September 2014 and the consequential need to initiate new service and supply contracts; welcomes, therefore, the commitment of CEPOL to continue to improve its budget management procedures and to better comply with the budgetary principle of annuity provided in the Financial Regulation;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the high implementation rate of the 2015 budget that reached 95.5% out of which 79% has been paid; notes, however, that according to the Court of Auditors, the level of committed appropriations for administrative
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the high implementation rate of the 2015 budget that reached 95.5% out of which 79% has been paid; notes, however, that according to the Court of Auditors, the level of committed appropriations for administrative expenditure carried over from 2014 to 2015 reached 49 % at the end of 2015, which is relatively high, although lower than in 2014 (59%);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the high implementation rate of the 2015 budget that reached 95.5% out of which 79% has been paid; notes, however, that according to the Court of Auditors, the level of committed appropriations for administrative expenditure carried over from 2014 to 2015 reached 49 % at the end of 2015, which is relatively high, although lower than in 2014 (59%);
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the high implementation rate of the 2015 budget that reached 95.5%
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Regrets that, according to the Court of Auditors' report, the College's audited budgetary implementation report differs from the level of detail provided by most other agencies; notes that this difference results from the fact that CEPOL has outsourced the role of Accounting Officer to the Accounting Officer of the European Commission; questions the added-value of this outsourcing if the level of detail in the implementation reports is still lower than for other EU agencies;
source: 597.596
2017/03/06
CONT
10 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 2 Paragraph 1 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Police College for the financial year
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas in the context of the discharge procedure, Parliament stresses the special importance of further strengthening the democratic legitimacy of the institutions of the Union by improving transparency and accountability, implementing the concept of performance=based budgeting and good governance of human resources;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Observes that a total of EUR 1 406 984 was carried over to 2016, amounting to 17 % of the overall 2015 budget; notes that, according to the Court’s report, the level of committed appropriations carried over was
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the cost of the relocation from Bramshill, UK to Budapest, Hungary was estimated at approximately EUR 1 006 515, to be spent during 2014 and 2015; notes moreover that in accordance with the agreement between the Commission and the UK, the amount of EUR 570 283 was financed with 50 % from the UK authorities and with 50 % from the Commission; acknowledges the fact that the UK contribution to the relocation funds was inscribed in the College’s budget as assigned revenue, which was fully used; welcomes the fact that the remaining relocation funds corresponding to 35 % of the final relocation budget were financed with the College’s budget by savings deriving from the lower correction coefficient applied to staff entitlements in Hungary; suggests, however, that the College further reduce the level of committed appropriations to be carried over to the following year and to keep it as low as possible;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes
source: 599.870
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0/date |
Old
2016-07-11T00:00:00New
2016-07-10T00:00:00 |
| events/4/docs |
|
| committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.870New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-593870_EN.html |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE595.383&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-595383_EN.html |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.870New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-599870_EN.html |
| events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
| events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
| events/3 |
|
| events/3 |
|
| events/4/docs |
|
| events/6 |
|
| events/6 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0081&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0081_EN.html |
| events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0160New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0160_EN.html |
| activities |
|
| commission |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| docs |
|
| events |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/07485New
|
| procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0182New
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0182 |
| procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOC |
| procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
| activities/6 |
|
| procedure/final |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
| activities/5/docs/0 |
|
| activities/5/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):ENNew
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN |
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016DC0475:ENNew
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):EN |
| activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/5 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
| activities/4/docs |
|
| activities/5 |
|
| activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
| activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/3/docs |
|
| activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
| activities/5 |
|
| activities/3 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
| activities/2/committees |
|
| activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
| activities/3 |
|
| activities/2/date |
Old
2017-03-23T00:00:00New
2017-03-22T00:00:00 |
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
| activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
| committees/0/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
| committees/0/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
| other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
| activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/1 |
|
| activities/2/committees |
|
| activities/2/date |
Old
2016-10-04T00:00:00New
2017-03-23T00:00:00 |
| activities/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
| committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
| committees/1/date |
2016-10-12T00:00:00
|
| committees/1/rapporteur |
|
| activities/1 |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/07485
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
| activities/0/commission/0 |
|
| other/0 |
|
| activities |
|
| committees |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure |
|