Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | AYALA SENDER Inés ( S&D) | ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( PPE), FITTO Raffaele ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), JÁVOR Benedek ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) for the financial year 2015.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2017/1633 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators for the financial year 2015.
CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Director of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2015.
This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 27 April 2017 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27 April 2017).
Amongst Parliaments main observations in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, the latter regretted that although the Agency's administrative board adopted the policy for the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, some CVs and declarations of the members of the board of regulators remain missing from the website. Parliament called for these documents to be published.
Parliament recalled, as it did the previous year, that the Agency has repeatedly signalled to the host Member State the urgency of the establishment of a European School in Ljubljana. It deplored the fact that, more than four years after the entry into force of the agreement between the Agency and the Slovenian Government, no European School has been set up.
The European Parliament decided to grant the Director of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) discharge in respect of the implementation of Authority’s budget for the financial year 2015.
The vote on the decision on discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex IV, Article 5 (1) (a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure).
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2015 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 508 votes to 117 with 10 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies .
These recommendations may be summarised as follows:
Agency’s financial statements : Parliament noted that the final budget of the Agency for the financial year 2015 was EUR 11 266 000, representing an increase of 3.55 % compared to 2014. It recalled that the Agency’s entire budget derives from the Union budget. Budget and financial management : Parliament noted that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2015 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 95.09 %, reaching the Agency’s planned target and representing an increase of 0.09 % compared with 2014. Commitments and carry-overs : Parliament stressed that carry-overs may often be partly or fully justified by the multiannual nature of the agencies’ operational programmes and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation nor are they always at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality. It noted the fact that the Agency found it difficult to reconcile the principle of annuality with the multi-annual nature of the REMIT implementation project.
Parliament also made a series of observations regarding procurement, recruitment procedures and internal audits.
On performance , Parliament noted that in late 2015 the Agency launched a survey enabling stakeholders to assess its regulatory activities, working methods and efficiency. It stated that in October 2015 the Agency released a study for a methodology proposal to evaluate the impact of the gas network codes and guidelines in terms of implementation and market effects . It asked the Agency to keep the discharge authority informed on the matter.
Lastly, as regards the prevention and management of conflicts of interests , Parliament stated that the Agency’s administrative board published the declarations of conflicts of interests on its website. However, it pointed out that some CVs and declarations of the members of the board of regulators remain missing. It called on the Agency to provide further information about this issue to the discharge authority.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Inés AYALA SENDER (S&D, ES) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) for the financial year 2015.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Director of the Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2015.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2015 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Agency’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Agency’s financial statements : Members noted that the final budget of the Agency for the financial year 2015 was EUR 11 266 000, representing an increase of 3.55 % compared to 2014. They recalled that the Agency’s entire budget derives from the Union budget. Budget and financial management : Members noted that budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2015 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 95.09 %, reaching the Agency’s planned target and representing an increase of 0.09 % compared with 2014. Commitments and carry-overs : Members stressed that carry-overs may often be partly or fully justified by the multiannual nature of the agencies’ operational programmes and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation nor are they always at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality. They noted the fact that the Agency found it difficult to reconcile the principle of annuality with the multi-annual nature of the REMIT implementation project.
Members also made a series of observations regarding procurement, recruitment procedures and internal audits.
Lastly, as regards the prevention and management of conflicts of interests , Members stated that the Agency’s administrative board published the declarations of conflicts of interests on its website. However, it pointed out that some CVs and declarations of the members of the board of regulators remain missing. They called on the Agency to provide further information about this issue to the discharge authority.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2015 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2015 of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2015, accompanied by the Agency's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Director of the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2015.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Agency's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Agency's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2015 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, one observation was made:
financial programming : the Council noted a high level of commitment appropriations carried over to 2016. It encouraged the Agency to continue improving its financial programming and monitoring of the budget implementation, in order to reduce the level of commitments carried over to the following financial year to the minimum strictly necessary.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) for the year 2015, together with the Agency’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit focused on the annual accounts of the Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER). As a reminder, the Agency's main task is to assist National Regulatory Authorities in exercising, at Union level, the regulatory tasks that they perform in the Member States and, where necessary, to coordinate their action.
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the Authority, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2015; and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Agency’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2015 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report also made a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Agency, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s observations :
budgetary management : as regards operational expenditure, the Court stated that the Agency carried over EUR 1.36 million. These carry-overs were mainly related to the implementation of REMIT (EUR 1.1 million), a complex operational activity on wholesale energy market integrity and transparency of a multiannual nature. The Agency also carried over EUR 0.79 million of administrative expenditure, mainly related to studies and services not yet delivered in 2015.
The Agency’s reply :
budgetary management : the Agency acknowledged the identified level of appropriations carried over, due to open commitments at year-end, mainly stemming from the long-term nature of the REMIT project implementation. Given the persistent uncertainty on the annual budgetary allocation to the Agency, it is difficult to reconcile the principle of annuality with the inevitable multiannual nature of the REMIT project.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report contained a summary of the Authority’s key figures in 2015 :
Budget : EUR 11.3 million. Staff : 80 including officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies . Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the ACER.
The Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) : the Agency, which is located in Ljubljana (SI), was set up by Regulation (EU) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with a view to helping the Member States’ regulatory authorities in the areas of electricity and natural gas. Its aim is to give an opinion on any of the issues relating to the purpose for which it has been established.
As regards the Agency’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 11 million;
- paid : EUR 14 million;
- carried-over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 11 million;
- paid : EUR 22 million;
- carried-over : EUR 2 million.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies . Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the ACER.
The Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) : the Agency, which is located in Ljubljana (SI), was set up by Regulation (EU) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with a view to helping the Member States’ regulatory authorities in the areas of electricity and natural gas. Its aim is to give an opinion on any of the issues relating to the purpose for which it has been established.
As regards the Agency’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 11 million;
- paid : EUR 14 million;
- carried-over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 11 million;
- paid : EUR 22 million;
- carried-over : EUR 2 million.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0156/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0147/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE599.862
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05873/2017
- Committee draft report: PE593.856
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 449 01.12.2016, p. 0017
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0112/2016
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex COM(2016)0475
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 449 01.12.2016, p. 0017 N8-0112/2016
- Committee draft report: PE593.856
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05873/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE599.862
Activities
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0147/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
27 |
2016/2189(DEC)
2017/03/07
CONT
27 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Citation 9 a (new) - having regard the ECA special Report No 15/2012 "Management of conflict of interest in selected EU Agencies";
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Notes with concern that the Agency published in 2016 a vacancy notice to recruit a budget officer as an AD8, breaching the establishment plan providing for the availability of the AD5 position only; calls on the Agency to send by June 2017 to the discharge authority all the vacancy notices and employments in the breach of the establishment plans since January 2015 to the present date; calls on the European Court of Auditors to thoroughly verify this case and possible similar others and to inform the discharge authority by June 2017;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Is concerned that the Agency refused to reintegrate a staff member who won the 2014 Court case F/34 ); calls on the Agency to solve this matter in accordance to the Court's decisions, by June 2017; regrets that the European Court of Auditors failed to disclose this case in its report on this Agency and calls on ECA to thoroughly verify this case and possibly similar others and to inform the discharge authority by June 2017;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Is concerned that the 2013-2016 reclassifications on positions and grades were not introduced into to the establishment plan submitted to the European Commission; in 2015 the Administrative Board was informed that the extra contract agents would be employed for a few months to respond to the immediate shortage of staff, but instead, the Agency had employed in the next period more extra staff for longer terms although it benefitted with 15 extra staff to whom other agencies contributed; the Agency's director failed to follow the DG BUDG and DG HR which had strongly expressed against the Director's decision to mitigate issues related to the establishment plan and the contract agents as resulting from an 2016 ACER Administrative Board meeting; moreover, apparently, all the reclassified staff members receive their salaries based on a 2016 decision of the Director, contrary to the DG BUDG and EC decisions; calls therefore on the Agency to respect and follow the European Commission line and decisions on human resources and implicitly the funding resources, reminding that the funding come from the tax payers money and asks that the discharge authority be informed on these issues by June 2017; calls on the European Court of Auditors to look into these matters and inform the Parliament by June 2017 and also explain by the same date the failure to refer to these problems in the area of ACER human resources and management in its report on the 2015 ACER activity;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Notes with concern that the 2015 ACER staff engagement survey, although stating some progress, shows that the results of the Administration Department are below the average and decreasing from 2013, contrary to the rest of the Agency; calls therefore on the Agency to inform the discharge authority by June 2017 on the measures taken by the Management following the survey recommendations in this area; calls on the European Court of Auditors to look into administration and human resources policies and practices and inform the Parliament by June 2017;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 e (new) 8e. Is concerned that the Head of Administration Department was reclassified in 2014 as AD12 being in conflict of interest as the person concerned was a member of the committee deciding the promotions; calls on the Agency to inform by June 2017 the discharge authority on all cases of conflict of interest in the human resources practice of the Agency; regrets that the European Court of Auditors failed to disclose this case in its report on this Agency and calls on ECA to thoroughly verify this case and possibly similar others in the last three years and to inform the discharge authority by June 2017;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that the Agency’s
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that the Agency’s administrative Board adopted the policy for the prevention and management of
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that the Agency’s administrative Board adopted the policy for the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, applicable to its staff with specific provisions for management, as well as to its administrative board, its board of regulators, its board of appeal, its working group chairs and co-chairs and its task-force convenors; notes, furthermore, that the Agency published the declarations of conflicts of interests on its website but points out that some CVs and declarations of the members of the board of regulators remain missing; notes that in 2016, the administrative board detected a potential
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Is concerned that some CVs and declarations of the Members of the Board of Regulators remain missing; notes that in 2016, the Administrative Board detected a potential conflict of interests entailed in Level III of one of its members and followed the ad hoc procedure provided for; asks the Agency to provide further information about this issue to the discharge authority by June 2017; calls on the European Court of Auditors to provide by June 2017 detailed information on these matters;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Director of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Emphasizes with concern that in the cases of Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Italy, Portugal, Poland, Netherlands, Latvia, Romania and UK the Members of Boards of Regulators were in conflict of interest by working, advising or cooperating with entities in the energy field while being in the Board of Regulators of this energy related Agency; urges the Agency to call upon the respective countries to withdraw their members that are subject of conflict of interests and replace them with individuals complying with Union's requirements on conflict of interest until June 2017; asks the Agency to provide detailed information about this issue to the discharge authority by June 2017;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Notes that together with national regulatory authorities the Agency has responsibilities regarding the monitoring of the European wholesale energy market; calls upon the Agency to communicate to the discharge authority the list of the meetings with lobbyist, professional associations, representatives of the industry operators as well as in the annual activity reports; asks the Agency to present the minutes of these meetings even in a confidential procedure by June 2017;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Urges the Agency to adopt internal guidelines on whistleblowing; recommends the Agency to disseminate these rules among its staff so that all employees to be aware of it; asks the Agency to provide by June 2017 details on the whistle-blower cases in 2015 (if any) and how they were handled and finalized; deplores the fact that the Agency has no rules on "revolving doors" and urges the Agency to put in place such rules as a matter of urgency establishing dissuasive sanctions such us the reduction of pensions or prohibition to work at least 3 years in similar bodies; reiterates only integrity and transparency uphold the public trust;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that the Act on Implementation of International Education Programmes was adopted in the host Member State on 16 June 2016 and entered into force on 15 July 2016;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that the Act on Implementation of International Education Programmes was adopted in the host Member State on 16 June 2016 and entered into force on 15 July 2016; notes that the host Member State initiated a feasibility study following adoption of the Act; recalls that the Agency has repeatedly signalled to the host Member State the urgency of the establishment of an European School in Ljubljana; deplores the fact that more than four years after the entry into force of the agreement between the Agency and the Slovenian Government, a European School has still not been set up;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Is concerned that the decision making in the ACER is not perceived as objective and transparent and the senior management does not have a clear vision on leading the Agency and setting up its goals, as resulting from the 2015 ACER Staff Engagement Survey; in addition, the Agency's leadership took decisions contrary to the European Commission and failed to consult and take into account the staff opinions, creating a split contrary to a team work, which does not fall into good leadership and management;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Notes with concern that the mandatory mobility is not enforced in the Agency and therefore some decisions could lead to arbitrary management; calls on the Agency to apply the mandatory mobility of the staff performing sensitive functions, such as administration, human and financial resources in order to eliminate the risks associated to sensitive management tasks, which should be object to mitigating controls and specific ex post controls; calls on the Agency to inform the discharge authority, by June 2017, on measures taken to practice the mandatory mobility;
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 2 2 Paragraph 1 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the Agency for the
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas in the context of the discharge procedure, Parliament stresses the special importance of further strengthening the democratic legitimacy of the institutions of the Union by improving transparency and accountability, implementing the concept of performance based budgeting and good governance of human resources;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that some of the staff members who received undue payments, allowances included, have not returned them; calls on the Agency to take urgent measures for recovering the undue payments and inform the discharge authority by June 2017 on the recovering the undue payments; recalls that the European citizens money are at stake and should be the leading principle in dealing with the financial matters; regrets that the European Court of Auditors failed to find this matter and protect the tax payers;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes the high level of appropriations carried over, explained by the Agency through the commitments at year-end, mainly streaming from the long-term nature of the REMIT project implementation; notes the Agency's statement on the uncertainty on the annual budgetary allocation and calls for additional explanations as annual budgetary allocations differ from one year to another to most EU bodies; calls the Agency to do its outmost to respect the principle of annuality;
source: 599.862
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2016-07-11T00:00:00New
2016-07-10T00:00:00 |
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.856New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-593856_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.862New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-599862_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0147&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0147_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0156New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0156_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/07509New
|
procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0161New
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0161 |
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOC |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/6 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5/docs/0 |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):ENNew
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016DC0475:ENNew
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):EN |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2017-03-23T00:00:00New
2017-03-22T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
committees/0/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
committees/0/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2016-10-04T00:00:00New
2017-03-23T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/07509
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|