BETA


2016/2191(DEC) 2015 discharge: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT AYALA SENDER Inés (icon: S&D S&D) ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš (icon: PPE PPE), FITTO Raffaele (icon: ECR ECR), ALI Nedzhmi (icon: ALDE ALDE), JÁVOR Benedek (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2017/09/29
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) for the financial year 2015.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2017/1678 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology for the financial year 2015.

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology in respect of its budget for the financial year 2015.

This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 27 April 2017 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27 April 2017).

Amongst Parliaments main observations in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, the latter noted that the Institute intends to conclude its internal rules on whistleblowing in the first half of 2017. It also called on the Institute to publish annual reports on the number of whistleblower cases and on how they were followed up and to provide those annual reports to the discharge authority.

Parliament expressed concern about the fact that the Institute has not taken specific initiatives in order to increase transparency relating to its contacts with stakeholders and lobbyists. A proactive transparency policy with regard to lobbyists is called for.

Noting the Institute's complex operational framework and management problems which have impeded its overall effectiveness, Parliament called for further coordination at EU level with the relevant Commission's DGs, and the interaction between the KICs and other Union initiatives to be strengthened.

Lastly, Parliament reiterated its call for the overall visibility of the Institute to be enhanced as some of the KIC partners are not even aware of their affiliation with the Institute.

2017/04/27
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/04/27
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) in respect of the implementation of the Institute’s budget for the financial year 2015.

The vote on the decision on discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex IV, Article 5 (1) (a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure).

Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Institute’s annual accounts for the financial year 2015 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 503 votes to 108 with 13 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies .

These recommendations may be summarised as follows:

Qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions : Parliament recalled that the Union contribution to the Institute’s budget in the 2014 to 2020 financial period is provided under the financial envelope of the Horizon 2020. According the Institute’s former financial rules (repealed with effect from 1 January 2014), the threshold for a flat rate reimbursement of indirect costs for non-profit public bodies, higher education establishments, research organisations or SMEs could have been raised to 40 %. Parliament noted that the Institute, in its 2014 grant agreements signed in February 2014, provided for a 40 % flat rate reimbursement of indirect eligible costs contrary to the Horizon 2020 rules already in force at the time. Horizon 2020 did not apply to the Institute and the Court therefore identified those reimbursements as irregular . Errors were also found as a result of ex-post verification of a sample of 2015 grant transactions. Institute’s financial statements : the final budget of the Institute for the financial year 2015 was EUR 266 566 618, representing an increase of 14.35 % compared to 2014.

Parliament also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, commitment and carry-overs, procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls.

It noted that the original target set by the Commission for the Institute to obtain financial autonomy was 2010. However, the Institute obtained partial financial autonomy in June 2011 , on the condition of continued ex-ante approval of grant related transactions and of procurements above EUR 60 000.

It also noted that the Institute requested the Commission to re-launch the process leading to full financial autonomy and that the Commission set out the roadmap and timetable of the process in May 2016. The Commission’s financial autonomy assessment is expected in the first half of 2017. The Institute hopes that full financial autonomy will be granted before the end of 2016 and asked that it reports to the discharge authority on developments related to this matter.

European visibility : lastly, Parliament noted with concern that general visibility of the Institute is low and some of the KIC partners are not aware of their affiliation with the Institute; calls for better visibility and promotion of the Institute brand as a unique innovation community. It welcomed the recent success in listing 18 Institute community members in the Forbes 30 under 30 list, featuring Europe’s best young innovators and entrepreneurs.

Documents
2017/04/27
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/04/26
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/03/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Inés AYALA SENDER (S&D, ES) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) for the financial year 2015.

The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Director of the Institute discharge in respect of the implementation of the Institute’s budget for the financial year 2015.

Members noted that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Institute for the financial year 2015 were reliable, but it could not obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. They called on the Parliament to approve the closure of the Institute’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :

Qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions : Members recalled that the Union contribution to the Institute’s budget in the 2014 to 2020 financial period is provided under the financial envelope of the Horizon 2020. According the Institute’s former financial rules (repealed with effect from 1 January 2014), the threshold for a flat rate reimbursement of indirect costs for non-profit public bodies, higher education establishments, research organisations or SMEs could have been raised to 40 %. Members noted that the Institute, in its 2014 grant agreements signed in February 2014, provided for a 40 % flat rate reimbursement of indirect eligible costs contrary to the Horizon 2020 rules already in force at the time. Horizon 2020 did not apply to the Institute and the Court therefore identified those reimbursements as irregular . Errors were also found as a result of ex-post verification of a sample of 2015 grant transactions. Institute’s financial statements : the final budget of the Institute for the financial year 2015 was EUR 266 566 618, representing an increase of 14.35 % compared to 2014.

Members also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, commitment and carry-overs, procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls.

They noted that the original target set by the Commission for the Institute to obtain financial autonomy was 2010. However, the Institute obtained partial financial autonomy in June 2011 , on the condition of continued ex-ante approval of grant related transactions and of procurements above EUR 60 000.

Lastly, they noted that the Institute requested the Commission to re-launch the process leading to full financial autonomy and that the Commission set out the roadmap and timetable of the process in May 2016. They noted that the Institute hopes that full financial autonomy will be granted before the end of 2016 and asked that it reports to the discharge authority on developments related to this matter.

Documents
2017/03/22
   EP - Vote in committee
2017/03/06
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/02/21
   CSL - Supplementary non-legislative basic document
Details

Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2015 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2015 of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Institute for the financial year 2015, accompanied by the Institute's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Director of the Institute in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2015.

The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that the Institute's annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Institute's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2015 are legal and regular with the exception of the matter regarding flat rate for calculating indirect eligible costs related to grants for non-profit public bodies higher education establishments, research organisations and small and medium-sized enterprises that was higher than the rate applicable according to Horizon 2020 rules and the Institute's Financial Regulation. The Council noted the Court's observation that the application of this flat rate was irregular, and of the Institute's reply that transitional rules in the Horizon 2020 legal basis provide for the use of the higher flat rate by the bodies mentioned above for reporting indirect costs.

It called on the Institute and the Court to clarify the matter and to reach an agreement on the correct interpretation of rules as soon as possible.

Other comments were made by the Council as regards:

financial programming : the Council invited the Institute to improve its financial programming and monitoring of the budget implementation, to reduce the level of commitments remaining unused at the end of the financial year, to make use of the provision in its Financial Regulation to re-enter unused appropriations in the budgets of the following years, and to actively seek to raise funds from private sources as stipulated in its founding regulation; reimbursements : the Council asked the Institute to define formally all of its reimbursement schemes, including a clear distinction between lump sum models and actual costs reimbursements. It also reminds that grant agreements have to be signed before the starting date of the actions funded by the grant; salaries : the Council called on the Institute to respect the principle of sound financial management in the remuneration of its staff and to comply with all relevant rules and regulations when deciding on the payment of bonuses.

Documents
2017/02/09
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/10/04
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2016/09/13
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) for the financial year 2015, together with the Institute’s replies.

CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.

This audit focused on the annual accounts of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT). The Institute’s objective is to contribute to sustainable European economic growth and competitiveness by reinforcing the innovation capacity of the Member States and the European Union. It awards grants to an increasing number of ‘Knowledge and Innovation Communities’ (KICs), linking the higher education, research and business sectors with one another and aiming thereby to boost innovation and entrepreneurship.

Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:

the annual accounts of the Institute, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2015, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.

Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Institute’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.

Qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts: the Court notes that the EU contribution to the Institute’s budget in the period 2014 to 2020 is provided under the Horizon 2020 financial envelope which implies that the Institute has to apply Horizon 2020 (H2020) rules.

Accordingly, the Institute aligned its Financial Regulation with effect from 1 January 2014 to H2020 rules and as of that date only a uniform flat rate of 25 % is applicable for the calculation of indirect eligible costs related to grants. Following the assessment of the 2014 business plans the EIT had informed the KICs in October 2013 that this might happen. However, the 2014 grant agreements signed in February 2014 with the KICs continue to provide for a flat rate of 40 % for non-profit public bodies, higher education establishments, research organisations and SMEs, which is contrary to the relevant provision.

Furthermore, a transition period for the application of the rules on the flat rate is not provided for in the Horizon 2020.

In the absence of a valid legal basis, the flat rate of 40 % for the reimbursement of indirect eligible cost is irregular. The total amount overpaid in applying this flat rate is EUR 5.5 million, corresponding to 3 % of the 2015 grant transactions.

The Court also notes the errors found as a result of ex post verification of a sample of 2015 grant transactions lead to a residual error rate of 2 % for the 2014 grant transactions. The combined error rate of the matters described above is 5 % of the 2015 grant transactions or 4.9 % of the total 2015 expenditure.

Accordingly, the Court gave a qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts of the EIT.

The report also made a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Institute, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:

The Court’s comments :

budgetary management : the Court noted that the EIT mobilises funds from public and private sources and use its resources in accordance with its Regulation. In spite of this, the contribution from the Horizon 2020 financial envelope accounted for 99 % of its 2015 budget. Even though the Institute is allowed to re-enter unused appropriations (appropriations not committed during the year or de-committed by the year end) in the budgets of the following 3 years, it had not adapted its process in time to re-enter 26.6 million euro available from the 2014 grant agreements in the 2015-2017 budgets. The level of carry-overs for committed appropriations was accordingly and mainly relate to contracts for IT services going beyond year-end; irregularities : the Court noted that the original target set by the Commission for the Institute to obtain financial autonomy was 2010. However it obtained only partial financial autonomy in June 2011 under the condition of continued ex ante approval of grant related transactions and of procurements above EUR 60 000. The Court also noted that the Institute funds the EIT Digital Master’s programme in which 16 European universities participate. The model for reimbursing the universities’ costs combines a lump sum maximum EUR 8 000 plus actual costs including flat rate based indirect costs. On average a total of EUR 15 000 per student was paid to the universities in 2015 on this basis (including the lump sum). However, the model has never been formally defined and does not allow a distinction between activities covered by the lump sum and those covered by the actual costs. The Institute should move towards a clear and formally defined model based on a single method for declaring costs such as a substantiated single lump sum. Lastly, the Court indicates that one KIC paid gross bonuses of EUR 646 000 to 55 of its staff (individual bonuses as much as EUR 100 000), which the Institute reimbursed at 100 %. Paying such bonuses using only public funds is an unusual practice and they should be taken into account in the ceiling for the EIT funding of individual salaries, which will be applied with effect from the 2016 grant agreement.

The Institute’s reply :

budgetary management : the EIT disagreed with the conclusion of the Court of Auditors, as no ‘overpayment’ or irregular payment was made for the reimbursement of indirect costs of KICs under the 2014 grant agreements. It indicated that the legislation applicable to the EIT financial assistance on 31 December 2013, the EIT Financial Rules, explicitly allowed the use of a 40 % flat rate for reporting indirect costs by higher education institutions, research organisations, non-profit public bodies and SMEs. Therefore, the use of the flat rate of 40 % by these bodies was legal and regular under the 2014 grant agreements. It also stated that the entry into force of the new Regulation on the Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation and Dissemination should not have affected the continuation of the actions concerned (i.e. the 2014 Business Plans of the KICs, which were established and assessed by the EIT in 2013) until the award of financial assistance by the EIT. This award should have been carried out under the legislation applicable on 31 December 2013. Consequently, the error rate of 2015 grant transactions, as calculated by the EIT, is 1.46 %, and not that stated by the Court; irregularities : the EIT indicated that the education activities covered by lump sums and actual costs can be distinguished in the EIT Digital Masters Programme. The lump sum tuition fees cover the costs of the universities related to the participation of students in technical courses. On the other hand, the activities reported based on actual costs relate to the EIT Digital specific learning outcomes and provide added value for students compared to the standard masters programmes offered by the participating universities. The EIT accepted that it should move towards a single lump sum model for financing KICs’ Masters programmes in order to simplify the cost reporting. With respect to bonuses , the EIT indicated that bonuses, as variable components of the basic remuneration of KIC management staff, comply with all relevant rules and regulations. More precisely, the variable complements were authorised by the employment contracts, they were determined on the basis of objective conditions, which were documented by the KIC Legal Entity and verified by EIT. The net amount actually paid to employees depends on the applicable withholding tax rate and the employees’ individual tax situation. On the basis of a tax rate of ca. 40 %-50 % of the gross amount reported by the Court of Auditors, the net amount was on average around EUR 6 000-7 000 per person. While the practice of reimbursing bonuses, as variable and performance-based components of remuneration, may be unusual, the objectives pursued by KICs as business-driven organisations, such as aiming for financial sustainability, are also unusual and cannot be found in other programmes. The use of variable elements as part of the basic remuneration can provide a strong incentive for good performance and ensure that value for money is achieved .

Lastly, the report contained a summary of the EIT’s key figures in 2015 :

Budget : EUR 231.7 million (in payment appropriations); Staff : 50 full time (staff includes officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts).

2016/08/05
   EP - AYALA SENDER Inés (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2016/07/11
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) .

CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.

The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.

From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:

Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies . Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.

This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.

It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), with a view to granting discharge.

Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.

The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.

The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.

Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the EIT.

The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) : the EIT, which is located in Budapest (HU), was set up by Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council . Its objective is to contribute to sustainable European economic growth and competitiveness by reinforcing the innovation capacity of the Member States and the European Union through raising awareness among potential partner organisations.

As regards the EIT’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015:

Commitment appropriations :

- committed: EUR 276 million;

- paid: EUR 251 million;

- carried-over: 0.

Payment appropriations :

- committed: EUR 247 million;

- paid: EUR 224 million;

- carried-over: EUR 1 million.

For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of the EIT .

2016/07/10
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) .

CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.

The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.

From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:

Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies . Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.

This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.

It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), with a view to granting discharge.

Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.

The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.

The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.

Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the EIT.

The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) : the EIT, which is located in Budapest (HU), was set up by Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council . Its objective is to contribute to sustainable European economic growth and competitiveness by reinforcing the innovation capacity of the Member States and the European Union through raising awareness among potential partner organisations.

As regards the EIT’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015:

Commitment appropriations :

- committed: EUR 276 million;

- paid: EUR 251 million;

- carried-over: 0.

Payment appropriations :

- committed: EUR 247 million;

- paid: EUR 224 million;

- carried-over: EUR 1 million.

For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of the EIT .

Documents

Votes

A8-0127/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender - Résolution #

2017/04/27 Outcome: +: 503, -: 108, 0: 13
DE IT ES FR RO HU NL PT SE BG CZ AT BE IE DK SI EL PL FI SK LT CY MT LU HR EE LV GB
Total
75
61
44
56
23
18
23
19
19
16
20
16
20
9
10
8
20
46
11
13
8
6
6
5
7
5
6
53
icon: PPE PPE
192

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
149

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
55

Germany ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

France NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: ENF ENF
28

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
17 2016/2191(DEC)
2017/03/06 CONT 17 amendments...
source: 599.890

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2016-07-11T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2016-07-11T00:00:00
New
2016-07-10T00:00:00
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-04-26-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/3
name
DE JONG Dennis
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.866
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-593866_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.890
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-599890_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2017-03-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0127_EN.html title: A8-0127/2017
summary
events/3
date
2017-03-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0127_EN.html title: A8-0127/2017
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170426&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2017-04-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0171_EN.html title: T8-0171/2017
summary
events/6
date
2017-04-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0171_EN.html title: T8-0171/2017
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0127&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0127_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0171
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0171_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: AYALA SENDER Inés date: 2016-08-05T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2016-08-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2016-08-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2016-08-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
activities
  • date: 2016-07-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0475 title: COM(2016)0475 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52016DC0475:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en title: Budget Commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2016-10-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš group: ECR name: FITTO Raffaele group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2016-08-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • date: 2017-03-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš group: ECR name: FITTO Raffaele group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2016-08-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • date: 2017-03-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0127&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0127/2017 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2017-04-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170426&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=29346&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0171 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0171/2017 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-09-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2016-08-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2016-08-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
docs
  • date: 2016-09-13T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2016:449:TOC title: OJ C 449 01.12.2016, p. 0112 title: N8-0123/2016 summary: PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) for the financial year 2015, together with the Institute’s replies. CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit. This audit focused on the annual accounts of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT). The Institute’s objective is to contribute to sustainable European economic growth and competitiveness by reinforcing the innovation capacity of the Member States and the European Union. It awards grants to an increasing number of ‘Knowledge and Innovation Communities’ (KICs), linking the higher education, research and business sectors with one another and aiming thereby to boost innovation and entrepreneurship. Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited: the annual accounts of the Institute, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2015, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts. Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Institute’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer. Qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts: the Court notes that the EU contribution to the Institute’s budget in the period 2014 to 2020 is provided under the Horizon 2020 financial envelope which implies that the Institute has to apply Horizon 2020 (H2020) rules. Accordingly, the Institute aligned its Financial Regulation with effect from 1 January 2014 to H2020 rules and as of that date only a uniform flat rate of 25 % is applicable for the calculation of indirect eligible costs related to grants. Following the assessment of the 2014 business plans the EIT had informed the KICs in October 2013 that this might happen. However, the 2014 grant agreements signed in February 2014 with the KICs continue to provide for a flat rate of 40 % for non-profit public bodies, higher education establishments, research organisations and SMEs, which is contrary to the relevant provision. Furthermore, a transition period for the application of the rules on the flat rate is not provided for in the Horizon 2020. In the absence of a valid legal basis, the flat rate of 40 % for the reimbursement of indirect eligible cost is irregular. The total amount overpaid in applying this flat rate is EUR 5.5 million, corresponding to 3 % of the 2015 grant transactions. The Court also notes the errors found as a result of ex post verification of a sample of 2015 grant transactions lead to a residual error rate of 2 % for the 2014 grant transactions. The combined error rate of the matters described above is 5 % of the 2015 grant transactions or 4.9 % of the total 2015 expenditure. Accordingly, the Court gave a qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts of the EIT. The report also made a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Institute, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows: The Court’s comments : budgetary management : the Court noted that the EIT mobilises funds from public and private sources and use its resources in accordance with its Regulation. In spite of this, the contribution from the Horizon 2020 financial envelope accounted for 99 % of its 2015 budget. Even though the Institute is allowed to re-enter unused appropriations (appropriations not committed during the year or de-committed by the year end) in the budgets of the following 3 years, it had not adapted its process in time to re-enter 26.6 million euro available from the 2014 grant agreements in the 2015-2017 budgets. The level of carry-overs for committed appropriations was accordingly and mainly relate to contracts for IT services going beyond year-end; irregularities : the Court noted that the original target set by the Commission for the Institute to obtain financial autonomy was 2010. However it obtained only partial financial autonomy in June 2011 under the condition of continued ex ante approval of grant related transactions and of procurements above EUR 60 000. The Court also noted that the Institute funds the EIT Digital Master’s programme in which 16 European universities participate. The model for reimbursing the universities’ costs combines a lump sum maximum EUR 8 000 plus actual costs including flat rate based indirect costs. On average a total of EUR 15 000 per student was paid to the universities in 2015 on this basis (including the lump sum). However, the model has never been formally defined and does not allow a distinction between activities covered by the lump sum and those covered by the actual costs. The Institute should move towards a clear and formally defined model based on a single method for declaring costs such as a substantiated single lump sum. Lastly, the Court indicates that one KIC paid gross bonuses of EUR 646 000 to 55 of its staff (individual bonuses as much as EUR 100 000), which the Institute reimbursed at 100 %. Paying such bonuses using only public funds is an unusual practice and they should be taken into account in the ceiling for the EIT funding of individual salaries, which will be applied with effect from the 2016 grant agreement. The Institute’s reply : budgetary management : the EIT disagreed with the conclusion of the Court of Auditors, as no ‘overpayment’ or irregular payment was made for the reimbursement of indirect costs of KICs under the 2014 grant agreements. It indicated that the legislation applicable to the EIT financial assistance on 31 December 2013, the EIT Financial Rules, explicitly allowed the use of a 40 % flat rate for reporting indirect costs by higher education institutions, research organisations, non-profit public bodies and SMEs. Therefore, the use of the flat rate of 40 % by these bodies was legal and regular under the 2014 grant agreements. It also stated that the entry into force of the new Regulation on the Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation and Dissemination should not have affected the continuation of the actions concerned (i.e. the 2014 Business Plans of the KICs, which were established and assessed by the EIT in 2013) until the award of financial assistance by the EIT. This award should have been carried out under the legislation applicable on 31 December 2013. Consequently, the error rate of 2015 grant transactions, as calculated by the EIT, is 1.46 %, and not that stated by the Court; irregularities : the EIT indicated that the education activities covered by lump sums and actual costs can be distinguished in the EIT Digital Masters Programme. The lump sum tuition fees cover the costs of the universities related to the participation of students in technical courses. On the other hand, the activities reported based on actual costs relate to the EIT Digital specific learning outcomes and provide added value for students compared to the standard masters programmes offered by the participating universities. The EIT accepted that it should move towards a single lump sum model for financing KICs’ Masters programmes in order to simplify the cost reporting. With respect to bonuses , the EIT indicated that bonuses, as variable components of the basic remuneration of KIC management staff, comply with all relevant rules and regulations. More precisely, the variable complements were authorised by the employment contracts, they were determined on the basis of objective conditions, which were documented by the KIC Legal Entity and verified by EIT. The net amount actually paid to employees depends on the applicable withholding tax rate and the employees’ individual tax situation. On the basis of a tax rate of ca. 40 %-50 % of the gross amount reported by the Court of Auditors, the net amount was on average around EUR 6 000-7 000 per person. While the practice of reimbursing bonuses, as variable and performance-based components of remuneration, may be unusual, the objectives pursued by KICs as business-driven organisations, such as aiming for financial sustainability, are also unusual and cannot be found in other programmes. The use of variable elements as part of the basic remuneration can provide a strong incentive for good performance and ensure that value for money is achieved . Lastly, the report contained a summary of the EIT’s key figures in 2015 : Budget : EUR 231.7 million (in payment appropriations); Staff : 50 full time (staff includes officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts). type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
  • date: 2017-02-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.866 title: PE593.866 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2017-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5873%2F17&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 05873/2017 summary: Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2015 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2015 of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Institute for the financial year 2015, accompanied by the Institute's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Director of the Institute in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2015. The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that the Institute's annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Institute's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2015 are legal and regular with the exception of the matter regarding flat rate for calculating indirect eligible costs related to grants for non-profit public bodies higher education establishments, research organisations and small and medium-sized enterprises that was higher than the rate applicable according to Horizon 2020 rules and the Institute's Financial Regulation. The Council noted the Court's observation that the application of this flat rate was irregular, and of the Institute's reply that transitional rules in the Horizon 2020 legal basis provide for the use of the higher flat rate by the bodies mentioned above for reporting indirect costs. It called on the Institute and the Court to clarify the matter and to reach an agreement on the correct interpretation of rules as soon as possible. Other comments were made by the Council as regards: financial programming : the Council invited the Institute to improve its financial programming and monitoring of the budget implementation, to reduce the level of commitments remaining unused at the end of the financial year, to make use of the provision in its Financial Regulation to re-enter unused appropriations in the budgets of the following years, and to actively seek to raise funds from private sources as stipulated in its founding regulation; reimbursements : the Council asked the Institute to define formally all of its reimbursement schemes, including a clear distinction between lump sum models and actual costs reimbursements. It also reminds that grant agreements have to be signed before the starting date of the actions funded by the grant; salaries : the Council called on the Institute to respect the principle of sound financial management in the remuneration of its staff and to comply with all relevant rules and regulations when deciding on the payment of bonuses. type: Supplementary non-legislative basic document body: CSL
  • date: 2017-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.890 title: PE599.890 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2016-07-11T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0475 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2016)0475 summary: PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) . CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union. The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows: Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies . Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions. This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective. It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), with a view to granting discharge. Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU. The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge. The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the EIT. The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) : the EIT, which is located in Budapest (HU), was set up by Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council . Its objective is to contribute to sustainable European economic growth and competitiveness by reinforcing the innovation capacity of the Member States and the European Union through raising awareness among potential partner organisations. As regards the EIT’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015: Commitment appropriations : - committed: EUR 276 million; - paid: EUR 251 million; - carried-over: 0. Payment appropriations : - committed: EUR 247 million; - paid: EUR 224 million; - carried-over: EUR 1 million. For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of the EIT .
  • date: 2016-10-04T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0127&language=EN title: A8-0127/2017 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Inés AYALA SENDER (S&D, ES) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) for the financial year 2015. The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Director of the Institute discharge in respect of the implementation of the Institute’s budget for the financial year 2015. Members noted that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Institute for the financial year 2015 were reliable, but it could not obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. They called on the Parliament to approve the closure of the Institute’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies : Qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions : Members recalled that the Union contribution to the Institute’s budget in the 2014 to 2020 financial period is provided under the financial envelope of the Horizon 2020. According the Institute’s former financial rules (repealed with effect from 1 January 2014), the threshold for a flat rate reimbursement of indirect costs for non-profit public bodies, higher education establishments, research organisations or SMEs could have been raised to 40 %. Members noted that the Institute, in its 2014 grant agreements signed in February 2014, provided for a 40 % flat rate reimbursement of indirect eligible costs contrary to the Horizon 2020 rules already in force at the time. Horizon 2020 did not apply to the Institute and the Court therefore identified those reimbursements as irregular . Errors were also found as a result of ex-post verification of a sample of 2015 grant transactions. Institute’s financial statements : the final budget of the Institute for the financial year 2015 was EUR 266 566 618, representing an increase of 14.35 % compared to 2014. Members also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, commitment and carry-overs, procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls. They noted that the original target set by the Commission for the Institute to obtain financial autonomy was 2010. However, the Institute obtained partial financial autonomy in June 2011 , on the condition of continued ex-ante approval of grant related transactions and of procurements above EUR 60 000. Lastly, they noted that the Institute requested the Commission to re-launch the process leading to full financial autonomy and that the Commission set out the roadmap and timetable of the process in May 2016. They noted that the Institute hopes that full financial autonomy will be granted before the end of 2016 and asked that it reports to the discharge authority on developments related to this matter.
  • date: 2017-04-26T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170426&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-04-27T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=29346&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-04-27T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0171 title: T8-0171/2017 summary: The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) in respect of the implementation of the Institute’s budget for the financial year 2015. The vote on the decision on discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex IV, Article 5 (1) (a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure). Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Institute’s annual accounts for the financial year 2015 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 503 votes to 108 with 13 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies . These recommendations may be summarised as follows: Qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions : Parliament recalled that the Union contribution to the Institute’s budget in the 2014 to 2020 financial period is provided under the financial envelope of the Horizon 2020. According the Institute’s former financial rules (repealed with effect from 1 January 2014), the threshold for a flat rate reimbursement of indirect costs for non-profit public bodies, higher education establishments, research organisations or SMEs could have been raised to 40 %. Parliament noted that the Institute, in its 2014 grant agreements signed in February 2014, provided for a 40 % flat rate reimbursement of indirect eligible costs contrary to the Horizon 2020 rules already in force at the time. Horizon 2020 did not apply to the Institute and the Court therefore identified those reimbursements as irregular . Errors were also found as a result of ex-post verification of a sample of 2015 grant transactions. Institute’s financial statements : the final budget of the Institute for the financial year 2015 was EUR 266 566 618, representing an increase of 14.35 % compared to 2014. Parliament also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, commitment and carry-overs, procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls. It noted that the original target set by the Commission for the Institute to obtain financial autonomy was 2010. However, the Institute obtained partial financial autonomy in June 2011 , on the condition of continued ex-ante approval of grant related transactions and of procurements above EUR 60 000. It also noted that the Institute requested the Commission to re-launch the process leading to full financial autonomy and that the Commission set out the roadmap and timetable of the process in May 2016. The Commission’s financial autonomy assessment is expected in the first half of 2017. The Institute hopes that full financial autonomy will be granted before the end of 2016 and asked that it reports to the discharge authority on developments related to this matter. European visibility : lastly, Parliament noted with concern that general visibility of the Institute is low and some of the KIC partners are not aware of their affiliation with the Institute; calls for better visibility and promotion of the Institute brand as a unique innovation community. It welcomed the recent success in listing 18 Institute community members in the Forbes 30 under 30 list, featuring Europe’s best young innovators and entrepreneurs.
  • date: 2017-04-27T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2017-09-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) for the financial year 2015. NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2017/1678 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology for the financial year 2015. CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology in respect of its budget for the financial year 2015. This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 27 April 2017 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27 April 2017). Amongst Parliaments main observations in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, the latter noted that the Institute intends to conclude its internal rules on whistleblowing in the first half of 2017. It also called on the Institute to publish annual reports on the number of whistleblower cases and on how they were followed up and to provide those annual reports to the discharge authority. Parliament expressed concern about the fact that the Institute has not taken specific initiatives in order to increase transparency relating to its contacts with stakeholders and lobbyists. A proactive transparency policy with regard to lobbyists is called for. Noting the Institute's complex operational framework and management problems which have impeded its overall effectiveness, Parliament called for further coordination at EU level with the relevant Commission's DGs, and the interaction between the KICs and other Union initiatives to be strengthened. Lastly, Parliament reiterated its call for the overall visibility of the Institute to be enhanced as some of the KIC partners are not even aware of their affiliation with the Institute.
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en title: Budget commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/8/07513
New
  • CONT/8/07513
procedure/final/title
Old
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0243
New
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0243
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOC
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.05 2015 discharge
New
8.70.03.05
2015 discharge
activities/6
date
2017-09-29T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOC
title
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0243
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/5/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=29346&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/5/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):EN
New
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
New
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):EN
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) in respect of the implementation of the Institute’s budget for the financial year 2015.

    The vote on the decision on discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex IV, Article 5 (1) (a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure).

    Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Institute’s annual accounts for the financial year 2015 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 503 votes to 108 with 13 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.

    These recommendations may be summarised as follows:

    • Qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions: Parliament recalled that the Union contribution to the Institute’s budget in the 2014 to 2020 financial period is provided under the financial envelope of the Horizon 2020. According the Institute’s former financial rules (repealed with effect from 1 January 2014), the threshold for a flat rate reimbursement of indirect costs for non-profit public bodies, higher education establishments, research organisations or SMEs could have been raised to 40 %. Parliament noted that the Institute, in its 2014 grant agreements signed in February 2014, provided for a 40 % flat rate reimbursement of indirect eligible costs contrary to the Horizon 2020 rules already in force at the time. Horizon 2020 did not apply to the Institute and the Court therefore identified those reimbursements as irregular. Errors were also found as a result of ex-post verification of a sample of 2015 grant transactions.
    • Institute’s financial statements: the final budget of the Institute for the financial year 2015 was EUR 266 566 618, representing an increase of 14.35 % compared to 2014.

    Parliament also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, commitment and carry-overs, procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls.

    It noted that the original target set by the Commission for the Institute to obtain financial autonomy was 2010. However, the Institute obtained partial financial autonomy in June 2011, on the condition of continued ex-ante approval of grant related transactions and of procurements above EUR 60 000.

    It also noted that the Institute requested the Commission to re-launch the process leading to full financial autonomy and that the Commission set out the roadmap and timetable of the process in May 2016. The Commission’s financial autonomy assessment is expected in the first half of 2017. The Institute hopes that full financial autonomy will be granted before the end of 2016 and asked that it reports to the discharge authority on developments related to this matter.

    European visibility: lastly, Parliament noted with concern that general visibility of the Institute is low and some of the KIC partners are not aware of their affiliation with the Institute; calls for better visibility and promotion of the Institute brand as a unique innovation community. It welcomed the recent success in listing 18 Institute community members in the Forbes 30 under 30 list, featuring Europe’s best young innovators and entrepreneurs.

activities/5
date
2017-04-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0171 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0171/2017
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/0
date
2016-07-11T00:00:00
docs
url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0475 celexid: CELEX:52016DC0475:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2016)0475
body
EC
type
Non-legislative basic document published
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en title: Budget Commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
activities/0/body
Old
EP
New
EC
activities/0/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en title: Budget Commissioner: GEORGIEVA Kristalina
activities/0/date
Old
2017-04-27T00:00:00
New
2016-07-11T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0475 title: COM(2016)0475 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
activities/0/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170426&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Inés AYALA SENDER (S&D, ES) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) for the financial year 2015.

    The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Director of the Institute discharge in respect of the implementation of the Institute’s budget for the financial year 2015.

    Members noted that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Institute for the financial year 2015 were reliable, but it could not obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. They called on the Parliament to approve the closure of the Institute’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:

    • Qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions: Members recalled that the Union contribution to the Institute’s budget in the 2014 to 2020 financial period is provided under the financial envelope of the Horizon 2020. According the Institute’s former financial rules (repealed with effect from 1 January 2014), the threshold for a flat rate reimbursement of indirect costs for non-profit public bodies, higher education establishments, research organisations or SMEs could have been raised to 40 %. Members noted that the Institute, in its 2014 grant agreements signed in February 2014, provided for a 40 % flat rate reimbursement of indirect eligible costs contrary to the Horizon 2020 rules already in force at the time. Horizon 2020 did not apply to the Institute and the Court therefore identified those reimbursements as irregular. Errors were also found as a result of ex-post verification of a sample of 2015 grant transactions.
    • Institute’s financial statements: the final budget of the Institute for the financial year 2015 was EUR 266 566 618, representing an increase of 14.35 % compared to 2014.

    Members also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, commitment and carry-overs, procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits and controls.

    They noted that the original target set by the Commission for the Institute to obtain financial autonomy was 2010. However, the Institute obtained partial financial autonomy in June 2011, on the condition of continued ex-ante approval of grant related transactions and of procurements above EUR 60 000.

    Lastly, they noted that the Institute requested the Commission to re-launch the process leading to full financial autonomy and that the Commission set out the roadmap and timetable of the process in May 2016. They noted that the Institute hopes that full financial autonomy will be granted before the end of 2016 and asked that it reports to the discharge authority on developments related to this matter.

activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0127&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0127/2017
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/5
date
2017-04-27T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/3
date
2017-03-30T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš group: ECR name: FITTO Raffaele group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2016-08-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
activities/2/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/3
date
2017-04-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2/date
Old
2017-03-23T00:00:00
New
2017-03-22T00:00:00
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/mepref
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008
New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/6/name
Old
ALIOT Louis
New
KAPPEL Barbara
committees/0/shadows/6/mepref
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008
New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096
committees/0/shadows/6/name
Old
ALIOT Louis
New
KAPPEL Barbara
other/0/dg/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.

    Analysis of the accounts of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT).

    CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.

    The EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.

    From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:

    • Direct management: the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services.
    • Indirect management: the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies.
    • Shared management: under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.

    This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.

    It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), with a view to granting discharge.

    Discharge procedure: the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.

    The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.

    The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.

    Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the EIT.

    The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT): the EIT, which is located in Budapest (HU), was set up by Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Its objective is to contribute to sustainable European economic growth and competitiveness by reinforcing the innovation capacity of the Member States and the European Union through raising awareness among potential partner organisations.

    As regards the EIT’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2015:

    Commitment appropriations:

    -          committed: EUR 276 million;

    -          paid: EUR 251 million;

    -          carried-over: 0.

    Payment appropriations:

    -          committed: EUR 247 million;

    -          paid: EUR 224 million;

    -          carried-over: EUR 1 million.

    For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of the EIT.

activities/1
date
2016-10-04T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2016-08-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
activities/2/date
Old
2016-10-04T00:00:00
New
2017-03-23T00:00:00
activities/2/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
FITTO Raffaele
committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
ALI Nedzhmi
committees/0/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
JÁVOR Benedek
committees/0/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
VALLI Marco
committees/0/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
ALIOT Louis
activities/1
date
2016-10-04T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/8/07513
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
GEORGIEVA Kristalina
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
GEORGIEVA Kristalina
activities
  • date: 2016-07-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0475 celexid: CELEX:52016DC0475:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2016)0475 body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2016-08-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
links
other
    procedure
    type
    DEC - Discharge procedure
    title
    2015 discharge: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    reference
    2016/2191(DEC)
    subject
    8.70.03.05 2015 discharge