BETA


2016/2245(INI) Deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe (icon: S&D S&D) VALCÁRCEL SISO Ramón Luis (icon: PPE PPE), PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr (icon: ECR ECR), JAKOVČIĆ Ivan (icon: ALDE ALDE), ROPĖ Bronis (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), D'AMATO Rosa (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion FEMM GERICKE Arne (icon: ECR ECR) Angelika MLINAR (icon: ALDE ALDE), Ángela VALLINA (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Anna ZÁBORSKÁ (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2018/03/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/11/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/11/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 506 votes to 103 with 77 abstentions, a resolution on the deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change.

Reacting to demographic change : Members recalled that demographic change is a key challenge , not only at European and global level, but also for local development and territorial enhancement policies in the EU.

Parliament felt that demographic change should be tackled in a coordinated manner through the action of all European, national, regional and local authorities and civil society representatives, taking into account the role of cities, rural areas and coastal and rural areas, fisheries, as well as areas facing specific problems related to their geographical or demographic situation.

While demographic change is creating new issues, it also opens development prospects at the local level. In this context, Parliament felt that the importance of smart specialisation strategies should be stressed to support regions and local territories in identifying high value-added activities and for building attractive innovation ecosystems that incorporate the circular economy into regional planning.

Characteristics of demographic change in the EU : stressing the disruption of the age pyramid, Members stated that one of the main objectives of an EU demographic policy should be to take into account all territories having to contend with demographic imbalances and the specificities of those territories. They suggested support for small and medium-sized mountain and rural farms, which produce products with specific quality characteristics and could serve to reverse or decrease depopulation in those areas .

The resolution stressed the steady increase in the number of elderly people – around 2 million people every year reach the age of 60 – which impacts on spatial, housing and transport planning and on other types of infrastructure and services. Regions have to adapt service provision, infrastructures and policy-making to those demographic patterns and trends.

Coordination of EU policies : Parliament called for a greater coordination of EU instruments , in particular the common agricultural policy (CAP), ESI Funds, including the Cohesion Fund, European Territorial Cooperation, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the Connecting Europe Facility, so as to ensure a more comprehensive approach to demographic change.

The Commission should propose a strategy on demographic change which gives priority to the following areas:

provision of new paid employment opportunities to maintain populations; infrastructure development as a factor in setting up businesses; the extension of information and communication technology (ICT) coverage in sparsely populated areas; the provision of basic state services and local public transport to ensure access to public services; policies designed to ensure sustainable generational renewal and appropriate care for dependent persons; policies on the reception, integration and return of migrants and refugees under international protection; the extensive use of new, more attractive settings for conveying information about rural life.

Members suggested:

incorporating demographic considerations throughout the policy spectrum, including in its budget headings , in order to enable the development of these policies, particularly in cohesion, employment, agriculture, environment, the information society, RDI (research, development and innovation), employment, education, social policy, and transport; creating, at a pan-European level, of networks for the exchange of good practices and experiences through which local and regional authorities, as well as civil society stakeholders, can educate each other on addressing issues created by demographic change.

Enhancing the effectiveness of European funds : Parliament stressed that ESI Funds must address demographic change more effectively in the next programming period:

the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) should make a greater contribution to and provide more support towards helping areas with high aging, rurality and population outflow indices to improve their transport and telecommunications infrastructure, bridge the digital divide (including between generations), and enjoy better public services; t he European Social Fund (ESF) should step up its work in training and educating young people , and should promote employability and help people strike a better work-life balance and combat the social and digital exclusion of elderly persons.

In general, the regions should use ESI Funds more proactively in order to tackle youth unemployment. Cohesion policy should also promote the employability and inclusion of women.

Members take the view that consideration of a special status for demographically disadvantaged regions should be discussed in the development of post-2020 cohesion policy.

The Commission was asked to: (i) consider the allocation of specific resources , within existing funds, to cover areas with serious and permanent demographic disadvantages; (ii) consider defining new criteria for distinguishing territories facing demographic challenges; (iii) incorporate a flagship demography initiative into the Europe 2020 Strategy, funded by existing ESI Funds.

Documents
2017/11/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/11/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/10/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ (S&D, ES) on the deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change.

Demographic change entails major economic, social, fiscal and environmental pressures on Member State governments and regional and local authorities. These pressures will be exacerbated by a declining active population and a higher dependency ratio.

According to Members, this issue should be tackled in a coordinated manner through the action of all European, national, regional and local authorities with the involvement of civil society representatives.

Account should be taken of the specific challenges posed by the outermost regions, northernmost regions with very low population density and islands, cross-border and mountain regions. The importance of smart specialisation strategies should be stressed to support regions and local territories in identifying high value-added activities and for building attractive innovation ecosystems that incorporate the circular economy into regional planning.

Characteristics of demographic change in the EU : stressing the disruption of the age pyramid, Members stated that one of the main objectives of an EU demographic policy should be to take into account all territories having to contend with demographic imbalances and the specificities of those territories, factors which cohesion policy has long been seeking to adapt to, and will have to do much more to adapt to after 2020.

There is a steady increase in the number of elderly people – around 2 million people every year reach the age of 60 – which impacts on spatial, housing and transport planning and on other types of infrastructure and services. Regions have to adapt service provision, infrastructures and policy-making to those demographic patterns and trends.

Coordination of EU policies : the report called for a greater coordination of EU instruments , in particular the common agricultural policy (CAP), ESI Funds, including the Cohesion Fund, European Territorial Cooperation, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the Connecting Europe Facility, so as to ensure a more comprehensive approach to demographic change.

Members highlighted the importance of the EU incorporating demographic considerations throughout the policy spectrum, including in its budget headings , in order to enable the development of these policies, particularly in cohesion, employment, agriculture, environment, the information society, RDI (research, development and innovation), employment, education, social policy, and transport.

The EU demographic policy should aim to be more complete and more coordinated with Member States and horizontally. The report called for the creation, at a pan-European level, of networks for the exchange of good practices and experiences through which local and regional authorities, as well as civil society stakeholders, can educate each other on addressing issues created by demographic change.

Enhancing the effectiveness of European funds : Members stressed that ESI Funds must address demographic change more effectively in the next programming period and that the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) should make a greater contribution to and provide more support towards helping areas with high aging, rurality and population outflow indices to improve their transport and telecommunications infrastructure, bridge the digital divide (including between generations), and enjoy better public services.

The European Social Fund (ESF) should step up its work in training and educating young people , and should promote employability and help people strike a better work-life balance and combat the social and digital exclusion of elderly persons. The Commission is called upon to consider setting up a specific envelope , within the scope of existing funds, dedicated to addressing areas experiencing severe and permanent demographic disadvantages.

Members expressed regret that the EU Youth Guarantee has made limited progress .

In order to avoid territorial divides, Members considered that the EFSI should benefit regions with the most unfavourable demographic dynamics by means of greater investment in EU priority areas such as energy, transport, education, business, innovation research, SMEs, education or social infrastructure. They take the view that consideration of a special status for demographically disadvantaged regions should be discussed in the development of post-2020 cohesion policy.

The future of cohesion policy to address demographic change : although cohesion policy provides the right tools with which to address demographic change, it should play a more prominent role to support regions and provide flexibility in adapting to demographic change.

Regions should use ESI Funds more proactively in order to tackle youth unemployment and give young people the opportunity to start a proper career. Cohesion policy should also promote the employability and inclusion of women.

The Commission is called on to:

consider defining new criteria with which to distinguish territories facing demographic challenges; conduct studies on potential socio-economic and environmental indicators; incorporate into cohesion policy new, dynamic indicators, such as a demographic indicator, and in particular the EU Regional Social Progress Index, so as to provide a more complete picture of the specific challenges facing these regions; incorporate a flagship initiative on demographics into the Europe 2020 strategy, financed by existing ESI funds.

Lastly, Members underlined the added value of the single community-led local development (CLLD) methodology across all ESI Funds for developing and implementing integrated and tailor-made bottom-up solutions. However, they regretted the fact that CLLD is only mandatory for the EAFRD and that local and participatory approaches are declining in the ERDF, ESF and European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF). They called on the Commission to make the use of CLLD obligatory across all ESI Funds.

Documents
2017/10/09
   EP - Vote in committee
2017/07/03
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/06/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/05/29
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/04/20
   EP - GERICKE Arne (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2016/10/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2016/07/14
   EP - GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in REGI

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0329/2017 - Iratxe García Pérez - Résolution 14/11/2017 12:49:51.000 #

2017/11/14 Outcome: +: 506, -: 103, 0: 77
DE ES IT RO PL PT FR BG BE HU AT IE HR SK SI LT LV CY GB MT SE EL FI CZ LU EE DK NL
Total
83
50
61
30
50
21
66
15
21
19
17
10
11
12
8
10
7
6
66
6
19
17
12
19
6
6
13
23
icon: PPE PPE
202
5

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
169

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Greece S&D

1

Finland S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
65

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Germany ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

3
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

For (1)

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
AmendmentsDossier
231 2016/2245(INI)
2017/07/03 REGI 231 amendments...
source: 606.298

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-11-13-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/3
name
VALLINA Ángela
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE604.887
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-604887_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.232&secondRef=01
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-606232_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.298
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-606298_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2017-10-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0329_EN.html title: A8-0329/2017
summary
events/2
date
2017-10-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0329_EN.html title: A8-0329/2017
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20171113&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2017-11-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0427_EN.html title: T8-0427/2017
summary
events/5
date
2017-11-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0427_EN.html title: T8-0427/2017
summary
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.232
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.232&secondRef=01
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0329&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0329_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0427
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0427_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe date: 2016-07-14T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2016-07-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: GERICKE Arne date: 2017-04-20T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2017-04-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GERICKE Arne group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.232&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.232
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
committees
  • type: Responsible Committee body: EP associated: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI date: 2016-07-14T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D shadows: name: VALCÁRCEL SISO Ramón Luis group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE name: PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE name: VALLINA Ángela group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL name: ROPĖ Bronis group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: D'AMATO Rosa group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Womens Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM date: 2017-04-20T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: GERICKE Arne group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
docs
  • date: 2017-05-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE604.887 title: PE604.887 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2017-06-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.232&secondRef=01 title: PE606.232 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2017-07-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.298 title: PE606.298 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=30341&j=0&l=en title: SP(2018)52 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-10-06T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-10-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-10-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0329&language=EN title: A8-0329/2017 summary: The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ (S&D, ES) on the deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change. Demographic change entails major economic, social, fiscal and environmental pressures on Member State governments and regional and local authorities. These pressures will be exacerbated by a declining active population and a higher dependency ratio. According to Members, this issue should be tackled in a coordinated manner through the action of all European, national, regional and local authorities with the involvement of civil society representatives. Account should be taken of the specific challenges posed by the outermost regions, northernmost regions with very low population density and islands, cross-border and mountain regions. The importance of smart specialisation strategies should be stressed to support regions and local territories in identifying high value-added activities and for building attractive innovation ecosystems that incorporate the circular economy into regional planning. Characteristics of demographic change in the EU : stressing the disruption of the age pyramid, Members stated that one of the main objectives of an EU demographic policy should be to take into account all territories having to contend with demographic imbalances and the specificities of those territories, factors which cohesion policy has long been seeking to adapt to, and will have to do much more to adapt to after 2020. There is a steady increase in the number of elderly people – around 2 million people every year reach the age of 60 – which impacts on spatial, housing and transport planning and on other types of infrastructure and services. Regions have to adapt service provision, infrastructures and policy-making to those demographic patterns and trends. Coordination of EU policies : the report called for a greater coordination of EU instruments , in particular the common agricultural policy (CAP), ESI Funds, including the Cohesion Fund, European Territorial Cooperation, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the Connecting Europe Facility, so as to ensure a more comprehensive approach to demographic change. Members highlighted the importance of the EU incorporating demographic considerations throughout the policy spectrum, including in its budget headings , in order to enable the development of these policies, particularly in cohesion, employment, agriculture, environment, the information society, RDI (research, development and innovation), employment, education, social policy, and transport. The EU demographic policy should aim to be more complete and more coordinated with Member States and horizontally. The report called for the creation, at a pan-European level, of networks for the exchange of good practices and experiences through which local and regional authorities, as well as civil society stakeholders, can educate each other on addressing issues created by demographic change. Enhancing the effectiveness of European funds : Members stressed that ESI Funds must address demographic change more effectively in the next programming period and that the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) should make a greater contribution to and provide more support towards helping areas with high aging, rurality and population outflow indices to improve their transport and telecommunications infrastructure, bridge the digital divide (including between generations), and enjoy better public services. The European Social Fund (ESF) should step up its work in training and educating young people , and should promote employability and help people strike a better work-life balance and combat the social and digital exclusion of elderly persons. The Commission is called upon to consider setting up a specific envelope , within the scope of existing funds, dedicated to addressing areas experiencing severe and permanent demographic disadvantages. Members expressed regret that the EU Youth Guarantee has made limited progress . In order to avoid territorial divides, Members considered that the EFSI should benefit regions with the most unfavourable demographic dynamics by means of greater investment in EU priority areas such as energy, transport, education, business, innovation research, SMEs, education or social infrastructure. They take the view that consideration of a special status for demographically disadvantaged regions should be discussed in the development of post-2020 cohesion policy. The future of cohesion policy to address demographic change : although cohesion policy provides the right tools with which to address demographic change, it should play a more prominent role to support regions and provide flexibility in adapting to demographic change. Regions should use ESI Funds more proactively in order to tackle youth unemployment and give young people the opportunity to start a proper career. Cohesion policy should also promote the employability and inclusion of women. The Commission is called on to: consider defining new criteria with which to distinguish territories facing demographic challenges; conduct studies on potential socio-economic and environmental indicators; incorporate into cohesion policy new, dynamic indicators, such as a demographic indicator, and in particular the EU Regional Social Progress Index, so as to provide a more complete picture of the specific challenges facing these regions; incorporate a flagship initiative on demographics into the Europe 2020 strategy, financed by existing ESI funds. Lastly, Members underlined the added value of the single community-led local development (CLLD) methodology across all ESI Funds for developing and implementing integrated and tailor-made bottom-up solutions. However, they regretted the fact that CLLD is only mandatory for the EAFRD and that local and participatory approaches are declining in the ERDF, ESF and European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF). They called on the Commission to make the use of CLLD obligatory across all ESI Funds.
  • date: 2017-11-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20171113&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-11-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30341&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-11-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0427 title: T8-0427/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 506 votes to 103 with 77 abstentions, a resolution on the deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change. Reacting to demographic change : Members recalled that demographic change is a key challenge , not only at European and global level, but also for local development and territorial enhancement policies in the EU. Parliament felt that demographic change should be tackled in a coordinated manner through the action of all European, national, regional and local authorities and civil society representatives, taking into account the role of cities, rural areas and coastal and rural areas, fisheries, as well as areas facing specific problems related to their geographical or demographic situation. While demographic change is creating new issues, it also opens development prospects at the local level. In this context, Parliament felt that the importance of smart specialisation strategies should be stressed to support regions and local territories in identifying high value-added activities and for building attractive innovation ecosystems that incorporate the circular economy into regional planning. Characteristics of demographic change in the EU : stressing the disruption of the age pyramid, Members stated that one of the main objectives of an EU demographic policy should be to take into account all territories having to contend with demographic imbalances and the specificities of those territories. They suggested support for small and medium-sized mountain and rural farms, which produce products with specific quality characteristics and could serve to reverse or decrease depopulation in those areas . The resolution stressed the steady increase in the number of elderly people – around 2 million people every year reach the age of 60 – which impacts on spatial, housing and transport planning and on other types of infrastructure and services. Regions have to adapt service provision, infrastructures and policy-making to those demographic patterns and trends. Coordination of EU policies : Parliament called for a greater coordination of EU instruments , in particular the common agricultural policy (CAP), ESI Funds, including the Cohesion Fund, European Territorial Cooperation, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the Connecting Europe Facility, so as to ensure a more comprehensive approach to demographic change. The Commission should propose a strategy on demographic change which gives priority to the following areas: provision of new paid employment opportunities to maintain populations; infrastructure development as a factor in setting up businesses; the extension of information and communication technology (ICT) coverage in sparsely populated areas; the provision of basic state services and local public transport to ensure access to public services; policies designed to ensure sustainable generational renewal and appropriate care for dependent persons; policies on the reception, integration and return of migrants and refugees under international protection; the extensive use of new, more attractive settings for conveying information about rural life. Members suggested: incorporating demographic considerations throughout the policy spectrum, including in its budget headings , in order to enable the development of these policies, particularly in cohesion, employment, agriculture, environment, the information society, RDI (research, development and innovation), employment, education, social policy, and transport; creating, at a pan-European level, of networks for the exchange of good practices and experiences through which local and regional authorities, as well as civil society stakeholders, can educate each other on addressing issues created by demographic change. Enhancing the effectiveness of European funds : Parliament stressed that ESI Funds must address demographic change more effectively in the next programming period: the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) should make a greater contribution to and provide more support towards helping areas with high aging, rurality and population outflow indices to improve their transport and telecommunications infrastructure, bridge the digital divide (including between generations), and enjoy better public services; t he European Social Fund (ESF) should step up its work in training and educating young people , and should promote employability and help people strike a better work-life balance and combat the social and digital exclusion of elderly persons. In general, the regions should use ESI Funds more proactively in order to tackle youth unemployment. Cohesion policy should also promote the employability and inclusion of women. Members take the view that consideration of a special status for demographically disadvantaged regions should be discussed in the development of post-2020 cohesion policy. The Commission was asked to: (i) consider the allocation of specific resources , within existing funds, to cover areas with serious and permanent demographic disadvantages; (ii) consider defining new criteria for distinguishing territories facing demographic challenges; (iii) incorporate a flagship demography initiative into the Europe 2020 Strategy, funded by existing ESI Funds.
  • date: 2017-11-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
procedure
reference
2016/2245(INI)
title
Deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change
subject
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subtype
Initiative
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure EP 54
stage_reached
Procedure completed
dossier_of_the_committee
REGI/8/08006