BETA


2016/2276(INI) Online platforms and the digital single market

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Joint Responsible Committee ['ITRE', 'IMCO'] JUVIN Philippe (icon: PPE PPE), VIRKKUNEN Henna (icon: PPE PPE) BLANCO LÓPEZ José (icon: S&D S&D), GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO Sergio (icon: S&D S&D), DALTON Daniel (icon: ECR ECR), VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen (icon: ECR ECR), KALLAS Kaja (icon: ALDE ALDE), MLINAR Angelika (icon: ALDE ALDE), REDA Felix (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), REIMON Michel (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BORRELLI David (icon: EFDD EFDD), ZULLO Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion JURI LE GRIP Constance (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 58

Events

2017/11/20
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/06/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/06/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 146 with 74 abstentions a resolution on online platforms and the digital single market.

Members considered that e-platforms are beneficial to the digital economy and to today's society because they offer consumers a wider range of choices and create new markets. However, they posed new policy and regulatory challenges.

Although many EU policies also apply to online platforms, in some cases the legislation is not correctly applied or interpreted differently across the Member States. In this regard, Members called for an effective and attractive regulatory environmen t to help develop digital and online activities in Europe.

Definition of platforms: Parliament agreed that one single EU definition or ‘one size fits all’ approach would not help the EU succeed in the platform economy due to the wide variety of platform types and their areas of activity, as well as the rapidly changing environment of the digital world.

However, MEPs are aware of the importance of avoiding the fragmentation of the EU's internal market as well as of the need to provide certainty and a level playing field for both businesses and consumers.

They therefore suggested that e-platforms should be distinguished and defined in the relevant sectoral legislation at EU level according to their characteristics, classifications and principles and following a problem-driven approach. They called on the Commission to propose, where appropriate, regulatory or other measures based on a thorough impact assessment.

Parliament believed that a clear distinction should be drawn between B2C and B2B platforms

in light of the emerging B2B online platforms which are key to the development of the industrial internet, such as cloud-based services or data-sharing platforms enabling communication between internet of things (IoT) products. The Commission should address barriers in the single market that hinder the growth of these platforms.

A level playing field: the resolution stressed the importance of fair and effective competition between online platforms in order to promote consumer choice and to avoid the creation of monopolies or dominant positions that distort markets. Network neutrality and equitable and non-discriminatory access to online platforms is a prerequisite for innovation and a truly competitive market.

Members urge the Commission to prioritise actions that allow European start-ups and online platforms to emerge and scale up.

Clarifying intermediaries' liability: Parliament noted that the current limited liability regime for intermediaries was one of the issues raised by some stakeholders and needed to be clarified. It stressed the following points:

the Commission should provide guidance to enable online platforms to comply with their responsibilities, improve legal certainty and increase user confidence; platforms should strengthen measures to combat illegal and harmful online content : Members welcomed the Commission's intention to propose measures for video sharing platforms to protect and remove content related to hate speech; liability rules for on-line platforms should address issues related to illegal content and goods : the Commission should define and clarify notification and withdrawal procedures to combat such content; platforms should provide users with tools to report false news so that other users are informed: the Commission should analyse the possibility of legislative intervention to limit the spread of false content.

In addition, Members stressed the need to:

set up online platforms to combat illegal goods and content and unfair practices (for example, resale of entertainment tickets at exorbitant prices) through regulatory measures supplemented by regulatory measures, (e.g. to identify repeat offenders, or by setting up specialised content moderation teams and tracing dangerous products) or hybrid measures; ensure compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation and the Directive on Network and Information Security, underlining the need to inform users of the exact nature of the data collected and the ways they will be used.

Informing and empowering citizens and consumers: the resolution underlined that the internet of the future cannot succeed without users’ trust in online platforms. Online platforms should offer customers clear, comprehensive and fair terms and conditions and ensure user-friendly ways of presenting their terms and conditions, processing of data, legal and commercial guarantees and possible costs, while avoiding complex terminology.

Lastly, Members called for an assessment of current legislation and self-regulatory mechanisms to determine whether they provide adequate protection for users, consumers and businesses in the context of a growing number of complaints and investigations initiated by the Commission concerning several platforms.

Documents
2017/06/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/06/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/06/09
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2017/06/09
   CSL - Council Meeting
2017/05/31
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Henna VIRKKUNEN (EPP, FI) and Philippe JUVIN (EPP, FR) on online platforms and the digital single market.

The report has been adopted pursuant to Rule 55 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (Joint committee meetings).

Members noted that the evolving development and use of internet platforms for a wide set of activities, including commercial activities and sharing goods and services, have changed the ways in which users and companies interact with content providers, traders and other individuals offering goods and services.

However, online platforms present new policy and regulatory challenges.

While welcoming the different initiatives already proposed under the Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe, Members stressed the importance of coordination and consistency between these initiatives. Although many EU policies also apply to online platforms, in some cases the legislation is not enforced properly or is interpreted in a different manner in the Member States. In this respect, Members called for an effective and attractive regulatory environment for the development of online and digital business in Europe.

Definition of platforms : the report stated that one single EU definition or ‘one size fits all’ approach would not help the EU succeed in the platform economy due to factors such as the great variety of types of existing online platforms and their areas of activity, as well as the fast-changing environment of the digital world.

Members are aware of the importance of avoiding the fragmentation of the EU internal market which could occur through a proliferation of regional or national rules and definitions, as well as of the need to provide certainty and a level playing field for both businesses and consumers.

Therefore, they called for online platforms to be distinguished and defined in relevant sector-specific legislation at EU level according to their characteristics, classifications and principles and following a problem-driven approach.

The report welcomed the Commission's ongoing work on online platforms, including consultations of stakeholders and carrying out an impact assessment. It called on it to propose, if necessary, regulatory or other measures based on this in-depth analysis.

Members considered that a clear difference should be made between B2C and B2B platforms, in light of the emerging B2B online platforms which are key to the development of the industrial internet, such as cloud-based services or data-sharing platforms enabling communication between internet of things (IoT) products. The Commission should address the barriers in the single market that are hindering the growth of such platforms.

Fair competition : the report stressed the importance of fair and effective competition between online platforms in order to promote consumer choice and avoid the creation of monopolies or dominant positions that distort markets. There is a need for net neutrality and fair and non-discriminatory access to online platforms as a prerequisite for innovation and a truly competitive market. The Commission is urged to streamline the funding schemes for related initiatives facilitating the digitisation process.

Clarifying the liability of intermediaries : the report noted that the current EU intermediary limited liability regime is one of the issues raised by certain stakeholders and that it should be further clarified. Guidance is needed from the Commission on the implementation of the intermediary liability framework in order to allow online platforms to comply with their responsibilities and the rules on liability, enhance legal certainty, and increase user confidence.

The Commission is called on to develop further steps to that effect, recalling that platforms not playing a neutral role as defined in the e-commerce Directive cannot claim liability exemption.

Members urged online platforms to strengthen measures to tackle illegal and harmful content online and welcomed the Commission's intention to propose measures for video-sharing platforms in order to protect minors and for taking down content related to hate speech.

They considered that the liability rules for online platforms should allow the tackling of issues related to illegal content and goods in an efficient manner, for instance by applying due diligence while maintaining a balanced and innovation-friendly approach.

They also stressed the importance of taking action against the dissemination of fake news and called on the online platforms to provide users with tools to denounce fake news in such a way that other users can be informed that the veracity of the content has been contested.

The Commission is called on to analyse in depth the current situation and legal framework with regard to fake news, and to verify the possibility of legislative intervention to limit the dissemination and spreading of fake content.

Moreover, Members stressed the need for online platforms to combat illegal goods and content and unfair practices (e.g. the reselling of entertainment tickets at extortionate prices), through regulatory measures complemented by effective self-regulatory measures (e.g. through clear terms of use and appropriate mechanisms to identify repeat offenders, or by setting up specialised content moderation teams and tracing dangerous products) or hybrid measures.

As regards data ownership , the report noted that compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive is essential. There is a need to inform users of the exact nature of the data collected and the ways it will be used.

Informing and empowering citizens and consumers : the report underlined that the internet of the future cannot succeed without users' trust in online platforms. Online platforms are encouraged to offer customers clear, comprehensive and fair terms and conditions and ensure user-friendly ways of presenting their terms and conditions, processing of data, legal and commercial guarantees and possible costs.

Lastly, Members called for an assessment of current legislation and self-regulation mechanisms in order to determine whether they provide adequate protection to users, consumers and businesses, against the backdrop of an increasing number of complaints and the investigations opened by the Commission into several platforms.

Documents
2017/05/18
   EP - Vote in committee
2017/05/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/02/16
   EP - LE GRIP Constance (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2016/11/24
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2016/11/24
   EP - Referral to joint committee announced in Parliament
2016/10/02
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2016/09/26
   RO_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2016/06/17
   EP - JUVIN Philippe (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ['ITRE', 'IMCO']
2016/06/17
   EP - VIRKKUNEN Henna (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ['ITRE', 'IMCO']
2016/05/26
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2016/05/25
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to present a targeted approach in order to respond to questions related to online platforms.

BACKGROUND: in its communication setting out a strategy for the digital single market , the Commission committed itself to undertaking a comprehensive assessment of the role of platforms, including in the sharing economy, and of online intermediaries.

Online platforms play a key role in innovation and growth in the Digital Single Market. They have revolutionised access to information and have connected buyers and sellers in a better and more efficient way. The growing importance of the digital economy linked with the diversity and fast changing nature of platform ecosystems also raise new policy and regulatory challenges.

A number of globally competitive platforms originated in Europe, for example Skyscanner and BlaBlaCar . However, on the whole, the EU currently represents only 4% of the total market capitalisation of the largest online platforms: the vast majority of platforms originate in the US and Asia.

Creating the right framework conditions and the right environment is essential to retain, grow and foster the emergence of new online platforms in Europe.

CONTENT: based on the results of a wide-ranging public consultation, the Commission Communication: (i) outlines the key issues identified in the assessment of online platforms; (ii) presents the Commission’s position on both the innovation opportunities and the regulatory challenges presented by online platforms, and sets out its approach to supporting their further development in Europe.

This communication underlines the need to adopt policy and regulatory approaches that respond directly to the challenges, and which are flexible and future-proof. Where appropriate, self-regulation and co-regulation can often achieve better outcomes for enabling the development of strong platform ecosystems in Europe and can complement or reinforce the existing legislation that already governs certain activities of online platforms.

As a general rule, when elaborating responses to issues related to online platforms, the Commission will take the following principles into account:

1) A level playing field for comparable digital services: many online platforms have challenged conventional business models. Yet these new services are not subject to the same rules as traditional telecommunications services.

As a general principle , comparable digital services should be subject to the same or similar rules, duly considering opportunities for reducing the scope and extent of existing regulation. To achieve a level playing field, there may be a need to simplify, modernise and lighten existing regulation, but avoid imposing a disproportionate burden on new as well as traditional business models.

The Commission will apply these principles to the current reviews of the EU telecoms rules and as part of the review of the ePrivacy Directive in 2016, for example when it reviews rules relating to confidentiality regarding OTT online communications services.

(2) Responsible behaviour of online platforms : compared with 2010, children aged 11 to 16 are now up to 20% more likely to be exposed to hate messages. Children are also more easily exposed to adult material online, often with unrestricted access. As of July 2015, more than 400 hours of video content was uploaded to YouTube every minute. Rights holders across several content sectors claimed that their content is used by some online platforms without authorisation.

The dialogue with IT companies towards a code of conduct on illegal hate speech online, the EU Internet Forum on terrorism content and the CEO Coalition to make the internet a better place for children are important examples of multi-stakeholder engagement processes aimed at finding common solutions to voluntarily detect and fight illegal or harmful material online.

The Commission will maintain the existing intermediary liability regime . It intends to:

suggest, in its proposal for an updated Audio-visual Media Services Directive, that video sharing platforms put in place measures to protect minors from harmful content and to protect everyone from incitement to hatred; achieve, in the next copyright package, a fairer allocation of value generated by the online distribution of copyright protected content; encourage coordinated EU-wide self regulatory efforts by online platforms; explore the need for guidance on the liability of online platforms when putting in place voluntary, good-faith measures to fight illegal content online; review the need for formal notice-and-action procedures.

3) Confidence, transparency and fairness : a 2016 Eurobarometer survey on online platforms showed that 72% of responding consumers were concerned about the data collected about them or their activities. Over 75% of respondents among the general public consider that more transparency is needed, in particular on how platform remuneration influences the listing of search engine results, on identification of the actual supplier of services or products, and on possible misleading practices including fake reviews.

Commission action will focus on:

a legislative proposal revising the Regulation on Consumer Protection Cooperation , to facilitate more efficient enforcement of EU consumer law in cross-border situations; the review of the guidance on the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive , an update of existing consumer protection rules in relation to platforms, and monitoring the implementation of the principles for comparison tools ; encouraging online platforms to recognise other electronic identification (eID) means that offer the same reassurance as their own.

4) Safeguarding a fair and innovation-friendly business environment : the Commission will carry out a targeted fact-finding exercise on B2B practices in the online platforms environment, e.g. (voluntary) dispute resolution mechanisms, transparency and better information measures or guidance. In particular, the Commission will engage closely with stakeholders and public authorities. By spring 2017, the Commission will determine whether additional EU action is needed.

5) Keeping markets open and non-discriminatory to foster a data-driven economy : as part of the ‘free flow of data’ initiative scheduled for the end of 2016, the Commission will consider options for effective approaches, including technical standards, to facilitate switching and portability of data among different online platform and cloud computing services, both for business and private users.

The Commission considers it important to ensure that future developments of digital technologies remain open.

Documents

Votes

A8-0204/2017 - Henna Virkkunen et Philippe Juvin - Commissions ITRE, IMCO, résolution 15/06/2017 12:27:13.000 #

2017/06/15 Outcome: +: 393, -: 146, 0: 74
IT DE ES PL RO FR HU PT CZ SK BE SI IE SE AT HR EL BG DK LT LU CY FI MT LV EE NL GB
Total
62
84
48
47
22
59
18
18
19
12
18
7
7
16
16
10
16
11
8
8
5
6
8
3
6
5
21
52
icon: PPE PPE
182

Belgium PPE

3
3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Malta PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
159

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Malta S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
52

Romania ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

1

France NI

Against (1)

2
3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
28

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
56

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
AmendmentsDossier
543 2016/2276(INI)
2017/03/27 ITRE, IMCO 462 amendments...
source: 602.752
2017/04/07 JURI 81 amendments...
source: 602.771

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
docs/1
date
2017-02-28T00:00:00
docs
title: PE599.814
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2016-10-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0288 title: COM(2016)0288
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
docs/4
date
2016-09-26T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0288 title: COM(2016)0288
type
Contribution
body
RO_CHAMBER
docs/4
date
2016-10-03T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0288 title: COM(2016)0288
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
docs/5
date
2016-09-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0288 title: COM(2016)0288
type
Contribution
body
RO_CHAMBER
events/6/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-06-14-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
shadows
committees/1
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: VIRKKUNEN Henna date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.814
docs/2
date
2017-05-08T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE601.100&secondRef=02 title: PE601.100
committee
JURI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2017-03-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE602.752 title: PE602.752
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE601.100&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-601100_EN.html
docs/3
date
2017-03-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE602.753 title: PE602.753
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/4
date
2017-05-08T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE601.100&secondRef=02 title: PE601.100
committee
JURI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2017-05-31T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0204_EN.html title: A8-0204/2017
summary
events/4
date
2017-05-31T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0204_EN.html title: A8-0204/2017
summary
events/6/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170614&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/8
date
2017-06-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0272_EN.html title: T8-0272/2017
summary
events/8
date
2017-06-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0272_EN.html title: T8-0272/2017
summary
docs/5/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0204&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0204_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0272
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0272_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
rapporteur
shadows
committees/1
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: VIRKKUNEN Henna date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2016-06-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VIRKKUNEN Henna group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: LE GRIP Constance date: 2017-02-16T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2017-02-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LE GRIP Constance group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
activities
  • date: 2016-05-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0288/COM_COM(2016)0288_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0288 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52016DC0288:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2016-11-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BLANCO LÓPEZ José group: S&D name: GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO Sergio group: ECR name: DALTON Daniel group: ECR name: VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen group: ALDE name: KALLAS Kaja group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: Verts/ALE name: REDA Julia group: Verts/ALE name: REIMON Michel group: EFD name: BORRELLI David group: EFD name: ZULLO Marco responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EPP name: VIRKKUNEN Henna body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BLANCO LÓPEZ José group: S&D name: GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO Sergio group: ECR name: DALTON Daniel group: ECR name: VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen group: ALDE name: KALLAS Kaja group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: Verts/ALE name: REDA Julia group: Verts/ALE name: REIMON Michel group: EFD name: BORRELLI David group: EFD name: ZULLO Marco responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 2016-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EPP name: JUVIN Philippe group: EPP name: VIRKKUNEN Henna body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2017-02-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: LE GRIP Constance body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2017-05-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BLANCO LÓPEZ José group: S&D name: GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO Sergio group: ECR name: DALTON Daniel group: ECR name: VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen group: ALDE name: KALLAS Kaja group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: Verts/ALE name: REDA Julia group: Verts/ALE name: REIMON Michel group: EFD name: BORRELLI David group: EFD name: ZULLO Marco responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EPP name: VIRKKUNEN Henna body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BLANCO LÓPEZ José group: S&D name: GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO Sergio group: ECR name: DALTON Daniel group: ECR name: VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen group: ALDE name: KALLAS Kaja group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: Verts/ALE name: REDA Julia group: Verts/ALE name: REIMON Michel group: EFD name: BORRELLI David group: EFD name: ZULLO Marco responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 2016-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EPP name: JUVIN Philippe group: EPP name: VIRKKUNEN Henna body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2017-02-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: LE GRIP Constance body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2017-05-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0204&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0204/2017 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3545 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 type: Debate in Council title: 3545 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2017-06-09T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2017-06-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170614&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-06-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0272 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0272/2017 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/1
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2016-06-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VIRKKUNEN Henna group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
IMCO
date
2016-06-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: EPP name: VIRKKUNEN Henna
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2017-02-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: LE GRIP Constance
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2017-02-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LE GRIP Constance group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 3545 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 date: 2017-06-09T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2016-05-26T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2016:0172:FIN:EN:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2016)0172 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2017-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.814 title: PE599.814 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE602.752 title: PE602.752 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE602.753 title: PE602.753 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-05-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE601.100&secondRef=02 title: PE601.100 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=29872&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)574 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2016-10-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0288 title: COM(2016)0288 type: Contribution body: DE_BUNDESRAT
  • date: 2016-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2016)0288 title: COM(2016)0288 type: Contribution body: RO_CHAMBER
events
  • date: 2016-05-25T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0288/COM_COM(2016)0288_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0288 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0288 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present a targeted approach in order to respond to questions related to online platforms. BACKGROUND: in its communication setting out a strategy for the digital single market , the Commission committed itself to undertaking a comprehensive assessment of the role of platforms, including in the sharing economy, and of online intermediaries. Online platforms play a key role in innovation and growth in the Digital Single Market. They have revolutionised access to information and have connected buyers and sellers in a better and more efficient way. The growing importance of the digital economy linked with the diversity and fast changing nature of platform ecosystems also raise new policy and regulatory challenges. A number of globally competitive platforms originated in Europe, for example Skyscanner and BlaBlaCar . However, on the whole, the EU currently represents only 4% of the total market capitalisation of the largest online platforms: the vast majority of platforms originate in the US and Asia. Creating the right framework conditions and the right environment is essential to retain, grow and foster the emergence of new online platforms in Europe. CONTENT: based on the results of a wide-ranging public consultation, the Commission Communication: (i) outlines the key issues identified in the assessment of online platforms; (ii) presents the Commission’s position on both the innovation opportunities and the regulatory challenges presented by online platforms, and sets out its approach to supporting their further development in Europe. This communication underlines the need to adopt policy and regulatory approaches that respond directly to the challenges, and which are flexible and future-proof. Where appropriate, self-regulation and co-regulation can often achieve better outcomes for enabling the development of strong platform ecosystems in Europe and can complement or reinforce the existing legislation that already governs certain activities of online platforms. As a general rule, when elaborating responses to issues related to online platforms, the Commission will take the following principles into account: 1) A level playing field for comparable digital services: many online platforms have challenged conventional business models. Yet these new services are not subject to the same rules as traditional telecommunications services. As a general principle , comparable digital services should be subject to the same or similar rules, duly considering opportunities for reducing the scope and extent of existing regulation. To achieve a level playing field, there may be a need to simplify, modernise and lighten existing regulation, but avoid imposing a disproportionate burden on new as well as traditional business models. The Commission will apply these principles to the current reviews of the EU telecoms rules and as part of the review of the ePrivacy Directive in 2016, for example when it reviews rules relating to confidentiality regarding OTT online communications services. (2) Responsible behaviour of online platforms : compared with 2010, children aged 11 to 16 are now up to 20% more likely to be exposed to hate messages. Children are also more easily exposed to adult material online, often with unrestricted access. As of July 2015, more than 400 hours of video content was uploaded to YouTube every minute. Rights holders across several content sectors claimed that their content is used by some online platforms without authorisation. The dialogue with IT companies towards a code of conduct on illegal hate speech online, the EU Internet Forum on terrorism content and the CEO Coalition to make the internet a better place for children are important examples of multi-stakeholder engagement processes aimed at finding common solutions to voluntarily detect and fight illegal or harmful material online. The Commission will maintain the existing intermediary liability regime . It intends to: suggest, in its proposal for an updated Audio-visual Media Services Directive, that video sharing platforms put in place measures to protect minors from harmful content and to protect everyone from incitement to hatred; achieve, in the next copyright package, a fairer allocation of value generated by the online distribution of copyright protected content; encourage coordinated EU-wide self regulatory efforts by online platforms; explore the need for guidance on the liability of online platforms when putting in place voluntary, good-faith measures to fight illegal content online; review the need for formal notice-and-action procedures. 3) Confidence, transparency and fairness : a 2016 Eurobarometer survey on online platforms showed that 72% of responding consumers were concerned about the data collected about them or their activities. Over 75% of respondents among the general public consider that more transparency is needed, in particular on how platform remuneration influences the listing of search engine results, on identification of the actual supplier of services or products, and on possible misleading practices including fake reviews. Commission action will focus on: a legislative proposal revising the Regulation on Consumer Protection Cooperation , to facilitate more efficient enforcement of EU consumer law in cross-border situations; the review of the guidance on the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive , an update of existing consumer protection rules in relation to platforms, and monitoring the implementation of the principles for comparison tools ; encouraging online platforms to recognise other electronic identification (eID) means that offer the same reassurance as their own. 4) Safeguarding a fair and innovation-friendly business environment : the Commission will carry out a targeted fact-finding exercise on B2B practices in the online platforms environment, e.g. (voluntary) dispute resolution mechanisms, transparency and better information measures or guidance. In particular, the Commission will engage closely with stakeholders and public authorities. By spring 2017, the Commission will determine whether additional EU action is needed. 5) Keeping markets open and non-discriminatory to foster a data-driven economy : as part of the ‘free flow of data’ initiative scheduled for the end of 2016, the Commission will consider options for effective approaches, including technical standards, to facilitate switching and portability of data among different online platform and cloud computing services, both for business and private users. The Commission considers it important to ensure that future developments of digital technologies remain open.
  • date: 2016-11-24T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-24T00:00:00 type: Referral to joint committee announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2017-05-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-05-31T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0204&language=EN title: A8-0204/2017 summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Henna VIRKKUNEN (EPP, FI) and Philippe JUVIN (EPP, FR) on online platforms and the digital single market. The report has been adopted pursuant to Rule 55 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (Joint committee meetings). Members noted that the evolving development and use of internet platforms for a wide set of activities, including commercial activities and sharing goods and services, have changed the ways in which users and companies interact with content providers, traders and other individuals offering goods and services. However, online platforms present new policy and regulatory challenges. While welcoming the different initiatives already proposed under the Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe, Members stressed the importance of coordination and consistency between these initiatives. Although many EU policies also apply to online platforms, in some cases the legislation is not enforced properly or is interpreted in a different manner in the Member States. In this respect, Members called for an effective and attractive regulatory environment for the development of online and digital business in Europe. Definition of platforms : the report stated that one single EU definition or ‘one size fits all’ approach would not help the EU succeed in the platform economy due to factors such as the great variety of types of existing online platforms and their areas of activity, as well as the fast-changing environment of the digital world. Members are aware of the importance of avoiding the fragmentation of the EU internal market which could occur through a proliferation of regional or national rules and definitions, as well as of the need to provide certainty and a level playing field for both businesses and consumers. Therefore, they called for online platforms to be distinguished and defined in relevant sector-specific legislation at EU level according to their characteristics, classifications and principles and following a problem-driven approach. The report welcomed the Commission's ongoing work on online platforms, including consultations of stakeholders and carrying out an impact assessment. It called on it to propose, if necessary, regulatory or other measures based on this in-depth analysis. Members considered that a clear difference should be made between B2C and B2B platforms, in light of the emerging B2B online platforms which are key to the development of the industrial internet, such as cloud-based services or data-sharing platforms enabling communication between internet of things (IoT) products. The Commission should address the barriers in the single market that are hindering the growth of such platforms. Fair competition : the report stressed the importance of fair and effective competition between online platforms in order to promote consumer choice and avoid the creation of monopolies or dominant positions that distort markets. There is a need for net neutrality and fair and non-discriminatory access to online platforms as a prerequisite for innovation and a truly competitive market. The Commission is urged to streamline the funding schemes for related initiatives facilitating the digitisation process. Clarifying the liability of intermediaries : the report noted that the current EU intermediary limited liability regime is one of the issues raised by certain stakeholders and that it should be further clarified. Guidance is needed from the Commission on the implementation of the intermediary liability framework in order to allow online platforms to comply with their responsibilities and the rules on liability, enhance legal certainty, and increase user confidence. The Commission is called on to develop further steps to that effect, recalling that platforms not playing a neutral role as defined in the e-commerce Directive cannot claim liability exemption. Members urged online platforms to strengthen measures to tackle illegal and harmful content online and welcomed the Commission's intention to propose measures for video-sharing platforms in order to protect minors and for taking down content related to hate speech. They considered that the liability rules for online platforms should allow the tackling of issues related to illegal content and goods in an efficient manner, for instance by applying due diligence while maintaining a balanced and innovation-friendly approach. They also stressed the importance of taking action against the dissemination of fake news and called on the online platforms to provide users with tools to denounce fake news in such a way that other users can be informed that the veracity of the content has been contested. The Commission is called on to analyse in depth the current situation and legal framework with regard to fake news, and to verify the possibility of legislative intervention to limit the dissemination and spreading of fake content. Moreover, Members stressed the need for online platforms to combat illegal goods and content and unfair practices (e.g. the reselling of entertainment tickets at extortionate prices), through regulatory measures complemented by effective self-regulatory measures (e.g. through clear terms of use and appropriate mechanisms to identify repeat offenders, or by setting up specialised content moderation teams and tracing dangerous products) or hybrid measures. As regards data ownership , the report noted that compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive is essential. There is a need to inform users of the exact nature of the data collected and the ways it will be used. Informing and empowering citizens and consumers : the report underlined that the internet of the future cannot succeed without users' trust in online platforms. Online platforms are encouraged to offer customers clear, comprehensive and fair terms and conditions and ensure user-friendly ways of presenting their terms and conditions, processing of data, legal and commercial guarantees and possible costs. Lastly, Members called for an assessment of current legislation and self-regulation mechanisms in order to determine whether they provide adequate protection to users, consumers and businesses, against the backdrop of an increasing number of complaints and the investigations opened by the Commission into several platforms.
  • date: 2017-06-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 title: 3545
  • date: 2017-06-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170614&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-06-15T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=29872&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-06-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0272 title: T8-0272/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 146 with 74 abstentions a resolution on online platforms and the digital single market. Members considered that e-platforms are beneficial to the digital economy and to today's society because they offer consumers a wider range of choices and create new markets. However, they posed new policy and regulatory challenges. Although many EU policies also apply to online platforms, in some cases the legislation is not correctly applied or interpreted differently across the Member States. In this regard, Members called for an effective and attractive regulatory environmen t to help develop digital and online activities in Europe. Definition of platforms: Parliament agreed that one single EU definition or ‘one size fits all’ approach would not help the EU succeed in the platform economy due to the wide variety of platform types and their areas of activity, as well as the rapidly changing environment of the digital world. However, MEPs are aware of the importance of avoiding the fragmentation of the EU's internal market as well as of the need to provide certainty and a level playing field for both businesses and consumers. They therefore suggested that e-platforms should be distinguished and defined in the relevant sectoral legislation at EU level according to their characteristics, classifications and principles and following a problem-driven approach. They called on the Commission to propose, where appropriate, regulatory or other measures based on a thorough impact assessment. Parliament believed that a clear distinction should be drawn between B2C and B2B platforms in light of the emerging B2B online platforms which are key to the development of the industrial internet, such as cloud-based services or data-sharing platforms enabling communication between internet of things (IoT) products. The Commission should address barriers in the single market that hinder the growth of these platforms. A level playing field: the resolution stressed the importance of fair and effective competition between online platforms in order to promote consumer choice and to avoid the creation of monopolies or dominant positions that distort markets. Network neutrality and equitable and non-discriminatory access to online platforms is a prerequisite for innovation and a truly competitive market. Members urge the Commission to prioritise actions that allow European start-ups and online platforms to emerge and scale up. Clarifying intermediaries' liability: Parliament noted that the current limited liability regime for intermediaries was one of the issues raised by some stakeholders and needed to be clarified. It stressed the following points: the Commission should provide guidance to enable online platforms to comply with their responsibilities, improve legal certainty and increase user confidence; platforms should strengthen measures to combat illegal and harmful online content : Members welcomed the Commission's intention to propose measures for video sharing platforms to protect and remove content related to hate speech; liability rules for on-line platforms should address issues related to illegal content and goods : the Commission should define and clarify notification and withdrawal procedures to combat such content; platforms should provide users with tools to report false news so that other users are informed: the Commission should analyse the possibility of legislative intervention to limit the spread of false content. In addition, Members stressed the need to: set up online platforms to combat illegal goods and content and unfair practices (for example, resale of entertainment tickets at exorbitant prices) through regulatory measures supplemented by regulatory measures, (e.g. to identify repeat offenders, or by setting up specialised content moderation teams and tracing dangerous products) or hybrid measures; ensure compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation and the Directive on Network and Information Security, underlining the need to inform users of the exact nature of the data collected and the ways they will be used. Informing and empowering citizens and consumers: the resolution underlined that the internet of the future cannot succeed without users’ trust in online platforms. Online platforms should offer customers clear, comprehensive and fair terms and conditions and ensure user-friendly ways of presenting their terms and conditions, processing of data, legal and commercial guarantees and possible costs, while avoiding complex terminology. Lastly, Members called for an assessment of current legislation and self-regulatory mechanisms to determine whether they provide adequate protection for users, consumers and businesses in the context of a growing number of complaints and investigations initiated by the Commission concerning several platforms.
  • date: 2017-06-15T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    CJ18/8/08311
    New
    • CJ18/8/08311
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/1
    Rules of Procedure EP 58
    procedure/legal_basis/1
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 055
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 2.40 Free movement of services, freedom to provide
    • 3.30.06 Information and communication technologies
    • 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet
    New
    2.40
    Free movement of services, freedom to provide
    3.30.06
    Information and communication technologies, digital technologies
    3.30.25
    International information networks and society, internet
    activities/3/docs/0/text
    • The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Henna VIRKKUNEN (EPP, FI) and Philippe JUVIN (EPP, FR) on online platforms and the digital single market.

      The report has been adopted pursuant to Rule 55 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (Joint committee meetings).

      Members noted that the evolving development and use of internet platforms for a wide set of activities, including commercial activities and sharing goods and services, have changed the ways in which users and companies interact with content providers, traders and other individuals offering goods and services.

      However, online platforms present new policy and regulatory challenges. 

      While welcoming the different initiatives already proposed under the Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe, Members stressed the importance of coordination and consistency between these initiatives. Although many EU policies also apply to online platforms, in some cases the legislation is not enforced properly or is interpreted in a different manner in the Member States. In this respect, Members called for an effective and attractive regulatory environment for the development of online and digital business in Europe.

      Definition of platforms: the report stated that one single EU definition or ‘one size fits all’ approach would not help the EU succeed in the platform economy due to factors such as the great variety of types of existing online platforms and their areas of activity, as well as the fast-changing environment of the digital world.

      Members are aware of the importance of avoiding the fragmentation of the EU internal market which could occur through a proliferation of regional or national rules and definitions, as well as of the need to provide certainty and a level playing field for both businesses and consumers.

      Therefore, they called for online platforms to be distinguished and defined in relevant sector-specific legislation at EU level according to their characteristics, classifications and principles and following a problem-driven approach.

      The report welcomed the Commission's ongoing work on online platforms, including consultations of stakeholders and carrying out an impact assessment. It called on it to propose, if necessary, regulatory or other measures based on this in-depth analysis.

      Members considered that a clear difference should be made between B2C and B2B platforms, in light of the emerging B2B online platforms which are key to the development of the industrial internet, such as cloud-based services or data-sharing platforms enabling communication between internet of things (IoT) products. The Commission should address the barriers in the single market that are hindering the growth of such platforms.

      Fair competition: the report stressed the importance of fair and effective competition between online platforms in order to promote consumer choice and avoid the creation of monopolies or dominant positions that distort markets. There is a need for net neutrality and fair and non-discriminatory access to online platforms as a prerequisite for innovation and a truly competitive market. The Commission is urged to streamline the funding schemes for related initiatives facilitating the digitisation process.

      Clarifying the liability of intermediaries: the report noted that the current EU intermediary limited liability regime is one of the issues raised by certain stakeholders and that it should be further clarified. Guidance is needed from the Commission on the implementation of the intermediary liability framework in order to allow online platforms to comply with their responsibilities and the rules on liability, enhance legal certainty, and increase user confidence.

      The Commission is called on to develop further steps to that effect, recalling that platforms not playing a neutral role as defined in the e-commerce Directive cannot claim liability exemption.

      Members urged online platforms to strengthen measures to tackle illegal and harmful content online and welcomed the Commission's intention to propose measures for video-sharing platforms in order to protect minors and for taking down content related to hate speech.

      They considered that the liability rules for online platforms should allow the tackling of issues related to illegal content and goods in an efficient manner, for instance by applying due diligence while maintaining a balanced and innovation-friendly approach.

      They also stressed the importance of taking action against the dissemination of fake news and called on the online platforms to provide users with tools to denounce fake news in such a way that other users can be informed that the veracity of the content has been contested.

      The Commission is called on to analyse in depth the current situation and legal framework with regard to fake news, and to verify the possibility of legislative intervention to limit the dissemination and spreading of fake content.

      Moreover, Members stressed the need for online platforms to combat illegal goods and content and unfair practices (e.g. the reselling of entertainment tickets at extortionate prices), through regulatory measures complemented by effective self-regulatory measures (e.g. through clear terms of use and appropriate mechanisms to identify repeat offenders, or by setting up specialised content moderation teams and tracing dangerous products) or hybrid measures.

      As regards data ownership, the report noted that compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive is essential. There is a need to inform users of the exact nature of the data collected and the ways it will be used.

      Informing and empowering citizens and consumers: the report underlined that the internet of the future cannot succeed without users' trust in online platforms. Online platforms are encouraged to offer customers clear, comprehensive and fair terms and conditions and ensure user-friendly ways of presenting their terms and conditions, processing of data, legal and commercial guarantees and possible costs.

      Lastly, Members called for an assessment of current legislation and self-regulation mechanisms in order to determine whether they provide adequate protection to users, consumers and businesses, against the backdrop of an increasing number of complaints and the investigations opened by the Commission into several platforms.

    activities/4
    body
    CSL
    meeting_id
    3545
    docs
    url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3545*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2017 type: Debate in Council title: 3545
    council
    Transport, Telecommunications and Energy
    date
    2017-06-09T00:00:00
    type
    Council Meeting
    activities/5/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170614&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/5/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/6/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0272 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0272/2017
    activities/6/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/3/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0204&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0204/2017
    activities/3
    date
    2017-05-31T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    activities/3
    date
    2017-06-14T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/4/date
    Old
    2017-06-12T00:00:00
    New
    2017-06-15T00:00:00
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    activities/2
    date
    2017-05-18T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    activities/1/committees/1/shadows/11
    group
    EFD
    name
    ZULLO Marco
    activities/1/committees/2/shadows/11
    group
    EFD
    name
    ZULLO Marco
    committees/1/shadows/11
    group
    EFD
    name
    ZULLO Marco
    committees/2/shadows/11
    group
    EFD
    name
    ZULLO Marco
    activities/2
    date
    2017-06-12T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/1/committees/1/shadows/8
    group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    REDA Julia
    activities/1/committees/2/shadows/8
    group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    REDA Julia
    committees/1/shadows/8
    group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    REDA Julia
    committees/2/shadows/8
    group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    REDA Julia
    activities/1/committees/1/date
    Old
    • 2016-06-17T00:00:00
    • 2016-06-17T00:00:00
    New
    2016-06-17T00:00:00
    activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0
    group
    EPP
    name
    JUVIN Philippe
    committees/1/date
    Old
    • 2016-06-17T00:00:00
    • 2016-06-17T00:00:00
    New
    2016-06-17T00:00:00
    committees/1/rapporteur/0
    group
    EPP
    name
    JUVIN Philippe
    activities/1/committees/3/date
    2017-02-16T00:00:00
    activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: LE GRIP Constance
    committees/3/date
    2017-02-16T00:00:00
    committees/3/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: LE GRIP Constance
    activities/1/committees/3
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Legal Affairs
    committee
    JURI
    committees/3
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Legal Affairs
    committee
    JURI
    activities/0/docs/0/text
    • PURPOSE: to present a targeted approach in order to respond to questions related to online platforms.

      BACKGROUND: in its communication setting out a strategy for the digital single market, the Commission committed itself to undertaking a comprehensive assessment of the role of platforms, including in the sharing economy, and of online intermediaries.

      Online platforms play a key role in innovation and growth in the Digital Single Market. They have revolutionised access to information and have connected buyers and sellers in a better and more efficient way. The growing importance of the digital economy linked with the diversity and fast changing nature of platform ecosystems also raise new policy and regulatory challenges.

      A number of globally competitive platforms originated in Europe, for example Skyscanner and BlaBlaCar. However, on the whole, the EU currently represents only 4% of the total market capitalisation of the largest online platforms: the vast majority of platforms originate in the US and Asia.

      Creating the right framework conditions and the right environment is essential to retain, grow and foster the emergence of new online platforms in Europe.

      CONTENT: based on the results of a wide-ranging public consultation, the Commission Communication: (i) outlines the key issues identified in the assessment of online platforms; (ii) presents the Commission’s position on both the innovation opportunities and the regulatory challenges presented by online platforms, and sets out its approach to supporting their further development in Europe.

      This communication underlines the need to adopt policy and regulatory approaches that respond directly to the challenges, and which are flexible and future-proof. Where appropriate, self-regulation and co-regulation can often achieve better outcomes for enabling the development of strong platform ecosystems in Europe and can complement or reinforce the existing legislation that already governs certain activities of online platforms.

      As a general rule, when elaborating responses to issues related to online platforms, the Commission will take the following principles into account:

      1) A level playing field for comparable digital services: many online platforms have challenged conventional business models. Yet these new services are not subject to the same rules as traditional telecommunications services.

      As a general principle, comparable digital services should be subject to the same or similar rules, duly considering opportunities for reducing the scope and extent of existing regulation. To achieve a level playing field, there may be a need to simplify, modernise and lighten existing regulation, but avoid imposing a disproportionate burden on new as well as traditional business models.

      The Commission will apply these principles to the current reviews of the EU telecoms rules and as part of the review of the ePrivacy Directive in 2016, for example when it reviews rules relating to confidentiality regarding OTT online communications services.

      (2) Responsible behaviour of online platforms: compared with 2010, children aged 11 to 16 are now up to 20% more likely to be exposed to hate messages. Children are also more easily exposed to adult material online, often with unrestricted access. As of July 2015, more than 400 hours of video content was uploaded to YouTube every minute. Rights holders across several content sectors claimed that their content is used by some online platforms without authorisation.

      The dialogue with IT companies towards a code of conduct on illegal hate speech online, the EU Internet Forum on terrorism content and the CEO Coalition to make the internet a better place for children are important examples of multi-stakeholder engagement processes aimed at finding common solutions to voluntarily detect and fight illegal or harmful material online.

      The Commission will maintain the existing intermediary liability regime. It intends to:

      • suggest, in its proposal for an updated Audio-visual Media Services Directive, that video sharing platforms put in place measures to protect minors from harmful content and to protect everyone from incitement to hatred;
      • achieve, in the next copyright package, a fairer allocation of value generated by the online distribution of copyright protected content;
      • encourage coordinated EU-wide self regulatory efforts by online platforms;
      • explore the need for guidance on the liability of online platforms when putting in place voluntary, good-faith measures to fight illegal content online;
      • review the need for formal notice-and-action procedures.

      3) Confidence, transparency and fairness: a 2016 Eurobarometer survey on online platforms showed that 72% of responding consumers were concerned about the data collected about them or their activities. Over 75% of respondents among the general public consider that more transparency is needed, in particular on how platform remuneration influences the listing of search engine results, on identification of the actual supplier of services or products, and on possible misleading practices including fake reviews.

      Commission action will focus on:

      • a legislative proposal revising the Regulation on Consumer Protection Cooperation, to facilitate more efficient enforcement of EU consumer law in cross-border situations;
      • the review of the guidance on the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, an update of existing consumer protection rules in relation to platforms, and  monitoring the implementation of the principles for comparison tools ;
      • encouraging online platforms to recognise other electronic identification (eID) means that offer the same reassurance as their own.

      4) Safeguarding a fair and innovation-friendly business environment: the Commission will carry out a targeted fact-finding exercise on B2B practices in the online platforms environment, e.g. (voluntary) dispute resolution mechanisms, transparency and better information measures or guidance. In particular, the Commission will engage closely with stakeholders and public authorities. By spring 2017, the Commission will determine whether additional EU action is needed.

      5) Keeping markets open and non-discriminatory to foster a data-driven economy: as part of the ‘free flow of data’ initiative scheduled for the end of 2016, the Commission will consider options for effective approaches, including technical standards, to facilitate switching and portability of data among different online platform and cloud computing services, both for business and private users.

      The Commission considers it important to ensure that future developments of digital technologies remain open.

    activities
    • date: 2016-05-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0288/COM_COM(2016)0288_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0288 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52016DC0288:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
    • date: 2016-11-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BLANCO LÓPEZ José group: S&D name: GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO Sergio group: ECR name: DALTON Daniel group: ECR name: VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen group: ALDE name: KALLAS Kaja group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: Verts/ALE name: REIMON Michel group: EFD name: BORRELLI David responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 2016-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EPP name: JUVIN Philippe group: EPP name: VIRKKUNEN Henna body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BLANCO LÓPEZ José group: S&D name: GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO Sergio group: ECR name: DALTON Daniel group: ECR name: VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen group: ALDE name: KALLAS Kaja group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: Verts/ALE name: REIMON Michel group: EFD name: BORRELLI David responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 2016-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EPP name: JUVIN Philippe group: EPP name: VIRKKUNEN Henna body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
    • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BLANCO LÓPEZ José group: S&D name: GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO Sergio group: ECR name: DALTON Daniel group: ECR name: VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen group: ALDE name: KALLAS Kaja group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: Verts/ALE name: REIMON Michel group: EFD name: BORRELLI David responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 2016-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EPP name: JUVIN Philippe group: EPP name: VIRKKUNEN Henna
    • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: BLANCO LÓPEZ José group: S&D name: GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO Sergio group: ECR name: DALTON Daniel group: ECR name: VAN BOSSUYT Anneleen group: ALDE name: KALLAS Kaja group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: Verts/ALE name: REIMON Michel group: EFD name: BORRELLI David responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2016-06-17T00:00:00 2016-06-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: EPP name: JUVIN Philippe group: EPP name: VIRKKUNEN Henna
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      CJ18/8/08311
      reference
      2016/2276(INI)
      title
      Online platforms and the digital single market
      legal_basis
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject