Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Joint Responsible Committee | ['LIBE', 'FEMM'] | JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO Teresa ( PPE), MLINAR Angelika ( ALDE) | CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria ( PPE), HEDH Anna ( S&D), KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne ( S&D), ŽITŇANSKÁ Jana ( ECR), GRIESBECK Nathalie ( ALDE), MARCELLESI Florent ( Verts/ALE), SARGENTINI Judith ( Verts/ALE), TROSZCZYNSKI Mylène ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 58
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 58Events
The European Parliament adopted by 517 votes to 74, with 72 abstentions, a resolution on the implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime.
As a reminder, Directive 2012/29/EU seeks to place the victim of a crime at the centre of the criminal justice system, and aims to strengthen the rights of victims of crime so that any victim can rely on the same level of rights, irrespective of where the offence took place, their nationality or residence status.
In a considerable number of cases, the victim is the most important witness in the trial and needs to be protected from possible retaliatory or threatening behaviour from the offender, including by preventing repeated or secondary victimisation.
Victims are often not well informed of trials and their outcomes and are all too often victims are unexpectedly informed of the release of an offender through media or other external factors, instead of by competent authorities.
Assessment of the implementation of the directive : Parliament criticised the Commission’s failure to submit a report to it and to the Council on the application of the Victims’ Rights Directive by November 2017. It called on the Member States to cooperate and send all relevant data and statistics to the Commission in order to facilitate its assessment of the implementation of the directive.
23 out of 27 Member States have transposed the Victims’ Rights Directive into national legislation as of September 2017. The Commission has started 16 infringement procedures against Member States that are still not fully compliant in practice.
Parliament noted the successful implementation by some Member States of certain provisions of the Victims’ Rights Directive, namely: the right to interpretation and translation, the right to be heard, the protection of child victims, the rights of victims when making a complaint, the right to receive information from the first contact with a competent authority.
Despite many changes introduced in Member States, victims still often lack awareness of their rights , undermining the Victims’ Rights Directive’s effectiveness on the ground and in particular the access to information requirement.
Members deplored, however, the remaining important shortcomings in the transposition and implementation of the directive in many Member States, in particular as regards:
the complexity of procedures for accessing support services; the victim support system, including insufficient access to legal aid and compensation, lack of financial support and coordination between support services, and inconsistent referral mechanisms, the fact that clear information is often not provided in more than one language, making it difficult, de facto, for victims to seek protection abroad in another Member State; the lack of a legislative foot-hold in cross-border cases and the rights of victims resident in other Member States, and failure to take measures to ensure that the lack of or uncertain residence status poses no barrier to victims’ ability to assert their rights under this directive.
In this regard, Member States are called on to:
promote easy access to justice and adequate legal aid free of charge , as this contributes greatly to breaking the silence and increasing the victim’s trust in the criminal justice system; implement and effectively enforce the right to information for all victims and potential victims; guarantee access for non-resident victims of crime to support services and information concerning their rights, and to adopt specific measures that focus in particular on the rights of all victims to compensation and within criminal proceedings; reinforce the rights of victims of hate crimes, including those against LGBTI persons or with racist motives; properly implement in their legislation timely individual assessments of the victims, including during their initial contact with a competent authority if necessary, as an essential procedural step for recognising and identifying a victim’s specific needs, to then grant specific protection in accordance with those needs, and to prevent secondary and repeat victimisation, intimidation and retaliation; provide adequate support for vulnerable groups, such as children, women victims of gender-based violence, the victims of human trafficking, LGBTI people and people with disabilities; increase the number and improve the accessibility of, women’s shelters and women’s centres , assisting the female victims of all types of gender-based violence, and to ensure that women survivors of violence are never declined a place; women’s shelters should help all women facing violence in close relationships, and should be available 24/7 and free of charge for women and their children, so that women can feel safe and able to report gender-based violence; pay particular attention to the individual assessment of children and the child victims of any form of crime, in particular human trafficking, including for sexual exploitation, of gender-based violence and of sexual abuse and exploitation; ensure that the 112 emergency hotline is fully accessible to disabled persons and that campaigns are launched to raise awareness of it.
Training : Parliament stressed that ensuring further training programmes at EU level is of paramount importance for the harmonisation and standardisation of procedures across the Member States and for ensuring equal treatment for European citizens.
Specialised training should be provided for those responsible for assisting the victims of terrorist acts, and to grant the necessary resources to that effect. In this regard, Member States are encouraged to adequately use EU funding for these training purposes.
Cross-border dimension : Parliament called on the Member States to provide financial and legal aid to family members in the event of a serious crime taking place in a different Member State to where the victim is resident, particularly in cases where the family cannot afford to travel to that Member State to attend court, to pay for psychological support or to bring the victim home.
Institutional perspective : Member States are called on to establish coordinated mechanisms for collecting information on the victims of terrorist attacks taking place in their territory, and, through the creation and development of a one-stop shop , to provide victims with a web portal and emergency telephone line or other means of communication, such as e-mail or multimedia messaging tools, giving access to secure, personalised, specific and relevant information in accordance with the user’s needs, with a confidential, free-of-charge and easily accessible support service.
In the event of a terrorist attack, a coordination centre should be established in order to bring together organisations and experts with the necessary expertise to provide information, support and practical services to the victims and to their families and relatives. These services should include specialist emotional and psychological support and vocational rehabilitation services.
The resolution called on the Commission to propose the creation of a European fund for assistance to the victims of terrorism .
Member States are called on to establish a permanent dedicated website on which all public information on the support services established following a terrorist attack that has taken place in that Member State can be accessed, and which should include information regarding the attack, getting in touch with missing victims and measures to help victims to return home, on how to obtain financial assistance, compensation or government benefits, etc.
Lastly, Parliament called on the Member States to implement efficiently, with sufficient economic and financial resources and in full cooperation with the Commission and other relevant actors, including civil society, all provisions of the Victims’ Rights Directive.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted the joint report by Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO (EPP, ES) and Angelika MLINAR (ALDE, AT) on the implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime.
The report has been adopted pursuant to Rule 55 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (Joint committee meetings).
As a reminder, Directive 2012/29/EU seeks to place the victim of a crime at the centre of the criminal justice system, and aims to strengthen the rights of victims of crime so that any victim can rely on the same level of rights, irrespective of where the offence took place, their nationality or residence status.
Assessment of the implementation of the directive : 23 out of 27 Member States have transposed the Victims’ Rights Directive into national legislation as of September 2017. The Commission has started 16 infringement procedures against Member States that are still not fully compliant in practice.
Members noted the successful implementation by some Member States of certain provisions of the Victims’ Rights Directive, namely: the right to interpretation and translation, the right to be heard, the protection of child victims, the rights of victims when making a complaint, the right to receive information from the first contact with a competent authority.
Despite many changes introduced in Member States, victims still often lack awareness of their rights, undermining the Victims’ Rights Directive’s effectiveness on the ground and in particular the access to information requirement.
Members deplored, however, the remaining important shortcomings in the transposition and implementation of the directive in many Member States, in particular as regards:
the complexity of procedures for accessing support services; the victim support system, including insufficient access to legal aid and compensation, lack of financial support and coordination between support services, and inconsistent referral mechanisms, the fact that clear information is often not provided in more than one language, making it difficult, de facto, for victims to seek protection abroad in another Member State; the lack of a legislative foot-hold in cross-border cases and the rights of victims resident in other Member States, and failure to take measures to ensure that the lack of or uncertain residence status poses no barrier to victims’ ability to assert their rights under this directive.
In this regard, Member States are called on to:
promote easy access to justice and adequate legal aid free of charge , as this contributes greatly to breaking the silence and increasing the victim’s trust in the criminal justice system, decreases the possibility of impunity and enables the victim to begin the process of psychological recovery; implement and effectively enforce the right to information for all victims and potential victims; guarantee access for non-resident victims of crime to support services and information concerning their rights, and to adopt specific measures that focus in particular on the rights of all victims to compensation and within criminal proceedings; reinforce the rights of victims of hate crimes, including those against LGBTI persons or with racist motives; properly implement in their legislation timely individual assessments of the victims, including during their initial contact with a competent authority if necessary, as an essential procedural step for recognising and identifying a victim’s specific needs, to then grant specific protection in accordance with those needs, and to prevent secondary and repeat victimisation, intimidation and retaliation; provide adequate support for vulnerable groups, such as children, women victims of gender-based violence, the victims of human trafficking, LGBTI people and people with disabilities; increase the number and improve the accessibility of, women’s shelters and women’s centres , assisting the female victims of all types of gender-based violence, and to ensure that women survivors of violence are never declined a place; women’s shelters should help all women facing violence in close relationships, and should be available 24/7 and free of charge for women and their children, so that women can feel safe and able to report gender-based violence; pay particular attention to the individual assessment of children and the child victims of any form of crime, in particular human trafficking, including for sexual exploitation, of gender-based violence and of sexual abuse and exploitation; adequately use EU funding for these training purposes.
Institutional perspective : Member States are called on to establish coordinated mechanisms for collecting information on the victims of terrorist attacks taking place in their territory, and, through the creation and development of a one-stop shop , to provide victims with a web portal and emergency telephone line or other means of communication, such as e-mail or multimedia messaging tools, giving access to secure, personalised, specific and relevant information in accordance with the user’s needs, with a confidential, free-of-charge and easily accessible support service.
In the event of a terrorist attack, a coordination centre should be established in order to bring together organisations and experts with the necessary expertise to provide information, support and practical services to the victims and to their families and relatives. These services should include specialist emotional and psychological support and vocational rehabilitation services.
The report called on the Commission to propose the creation of a European fund for assistance to the victims of terrorism .
Member States are called on to establish a permanent dedicated website on which all public information on the support services established following a terrorist attack that has taken place in that Member State can be accessed, and which should include information regarding the attack, getting in touch with missing victims and measures to help victims to return home, on how to obtain financial assistance, compensation or government benefits, etc.
Lastly, Members called on the Member States to implement efficiently, with sufficient economic and financial resources and in full cooperation with the Commission and other relevant actors, including civil society, all provisions of the Victims’ Rights Directive.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0229/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0168/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE619.161
- Committee draft report: PE618.057
- Committee draft report: PE618.057
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE619.161
Activities
- Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO
- Angelika MLINAR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Nathalie GRIESBECK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Diane JAMES
- Urszula KRUPA
- Cécile Kashetu KYENGE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica MACOVEI
- Florent MARCELLESI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Helga STEVENS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Josef WEIDENHOLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - § 18 30/05/2018 13:37:17.000 #
A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - § 43/2 30/05/2018 13:37:52.000 #
IT | DE | ES | FR | GB | RO | SE | BE | PT | AT | NL | FI | CZ | HU | IE | EL | LT | MT | LU | LV | HR | CY | BG | EE | SI | SK | DK | ?? | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
64
|
86
|
47
|
71
|
66
|
27
|
19
|
20
|
20
|
18
|
26
|
12
|
18
|
12
|
9
|
14
|
10
|
6
|
5
|
8
|
11
|
5
|
13
|
5
|
3
|
11
|
7
|
1
|
45
|
|
S&D |
166
|
Italy S&DFor (27)Alessia Maria MOSCA, Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Isabella DE MONTE, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
|
Germany S&DFor (23)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Michael DETJEN, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Ulrike RODUST
|
13
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (19) |
Sweden S&D |
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (8) |
Austria S&D |
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
|||
PPE |
178
|
Italy PPEAgainst (1)Abstain (5) |
Germany PPEFor (15)Against (9)Abstain (8) |
Spain PPEFor (12)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
France PPEFor (19)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
|
1
|
Romania PPEFor (9)Against (2) |
3
|
4
|
Portugal PPEFor (6)Against (1) |
Austria PPEFor (4)Against (1) |
Netherlands PPEFor (5) |
3
|
Czechia PPEFor (3)Against (3) |
Hungary PPEFor (6)Abstain (1) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
Croatia PPEFor (2)Against (3) |
1
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (1)Abstain (3) |
1
|
Slovakia PPEFor (3)Against (2) |
1
|
Poland PPEFor (16)Abstain (1) |
||
ALDE |
63
|
3
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||
Verts/ALE |
50
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (13) |
Spain Verts/ALE |
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
4
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
48
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
France GUE/NGL |
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||
ECR |
61
|
2
|
4
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (17) |
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
Poland ECRAgainst (17) |
||||||||||||||
EFDD |
42
|
Italy EFDDFor (13)Abstain (1) |
1
|
France EFDDAgainst (2) |
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (16) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
18
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
Greece NIFor (2)Against (3) |
1
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
Italy ENFFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - § 60/2 30/05/2018 13:38:15.000 #
DE | IT | ES | FR | GB | RO | PT | BE | SE | NL | BG | FI | CZ | IE | HU | LV | EL | LT | LU | CY | HR | DK | EE | SI | SK | ?? | AT | MT | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
81
|
63
|
45
|
69
|
64
|
27
|
20
|
20
|
19
|
26
|
13
|
12
|
18
|
10
|
13
|
8
|
15
|
10
|
5
|
5
|
11
|
7
|
5
|
3
|
11
|
1
|
18
|
6
|
46
|
|
S&D |
166
|
Germany S&DFor (23)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Michael DETJEN, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Ulrike RODUST
|
Italy S&DFor (26)Alessia Maria MOSCA, Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Isabella DE MONTE, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI, Simona BONAFÈ
|
13
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (20) |
Portugal S&DFor (8) |
3
|
Sweden S&D |
3
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Austria S&D |
3
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
|||
PPE |
175
|
Germany PPEFor (18)Against (6)Abstain (3) |
Italy PPEAgainst (6) |
France PPEFor (19)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
|
2
|
Romania PPEFor (9)Against (2) |
Portugal PPEFor (7) |
4
|
3
|
Netherlands PPEFor (5) |
Bulgaria PPEFor (6) |
3
|
Czechia PPEFor (3)Against (3) |
4
|
Hungary PPEFor (5)Abstain (3) |
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Croatia PPEFor (2)Against (3) |
1
|
1
|
Slovakia PPEFor (3)Against (2) |
5
|
3
|
Poland PPEFor (17)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Julia PITERA, Krzysztof HETMAN, Marek PLURA, Michał BONI, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Abstain (1) |
|||
ALDE |
63
|
3
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
3
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||
Verts/ALE |
50
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (13) |
1
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
48
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
France GUE/NGL |
1
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
40
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (13)Abstain (1) |
France EFDDFor (3)Against (1) |
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (1) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
Germany ECRFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
2
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (10)Abstain (4) |
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Poland ECRAgainst (17) |
|||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
Greece NIFor (2)Against (3) |
1
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
1
|
Italy ENFFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - Considérant N 30/05/2018 13:38:27.000 #
DE | ES | IT | FR | RO | GB | PT | NL | SE | PL | BE | HU | CZ | BG | IE | FI | HR | LT | EL | SK | LV | EE | CY | LU | MT | DK | SI | ?? | AT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
83
|
49
|
61
|
70
|
28
|
66
|
20
|
26
|
19
|
43
|
19
|
14
|
17
|
13
|
10
|
12
|
11
|
10
|
16
|
11
|
8
|
5
|
5
|
4
|
6
|
7
|
3
|
1
|
18
|
|
PPE |
181
|
Germany PPEFor (30)Albert DESS, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Burkhard BALZ, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN, Werner LANGEN
Against (1) |
Spain PPEFor (14)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
France PPEFor (16)Against (2) |
2
|
Portugal PPEFor (6)Against (1) |
Netherlands PPEFor (5) |
3
|
4
|
Hungary PPEFor (9) |
Czechia PPEFor (6) |
Bulgaria PPEFor (6) |
4
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
|||||
S&D |
161
|
Germany S&DFor (22)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Ulrike RODUST
|
13
|
Italy S&DFor (24)Alessia Maria MOSCA, Andrea COZZOLINO, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (19)Against (1) |
Portugal S&DFor (8) |
3
|
Sweden S&D |
Poland S&DFor (5) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Austria S&D |
|||
ALDE |
62
|
3
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
4
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
48
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
France GUE/NGL |
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
48
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
Spain Verts/ALE |
1
|
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
2
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
||||||||||||||
ECR |
62
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (16) |
2
|
Poland ECRAbstain (17) |
4
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||
NI |
18
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom NIFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
Poland NIAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
Greece NIFor (2)Against (3) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
42
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (13)Abstain (1) |
France EFDDFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (3) |
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14)Abstain (2) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
1
|
Italy ENFAgainst (6) |
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
4
|