BETA


2016/2328(INI) Implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Joint Responsible Committee ['LIBE', 'FEMM'] JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO Teresa (icon: PPE PPE), MLINAR Angelika (icon: ALDE ALDE) CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria (icon: PPE PPE), HEDH Anna (icon: S&D S&D), KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne (icon: S&D S&D), ŽITŇANSKÁ Jana (icon: ECR ECR), GRIESBECK Nathalie (icon: ALDE ALDE), MARCELLESI Florent (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), SARGENTINI Judith (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), TROSZCZYNSKI Mylène (icon: ENF ENF)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 58

Events

2018/05/30
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/05/30
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 517 votes to 74, with 72 abstentions, a resolution on the implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime.

As a reminder, Directive 2012/29/EU seeks to place the victim of a crime at the centre of the criminal justice system, and aims to strengthen the rights of victims of crime so that any victim can rely on the same level of rights, irrespective of where the offence took place, their nationality or residence status.

In a considerable number of cases, the victim is the most important witness in the trial and needs to be protected from possible retaliatory or threatening behaviour from the offender, including by preventing repeated or secondary victimisation.

Victims are often not well informed of trials and their outcomes and are all too often victims are unexpectedly informed of the release of an offender through media or other external factors, instead of by competent authorities.

Assessment of the implementation of the directive : Parliament criticised the Commission’s failure to submit a report to it and to the Council on the application of the Victims’ Rights Directive by November 2017. It called on the Member States to cooperate and send all relevant data and statistics to the Commission in order to facilitate its assessment of the implementation of the directive.

23 out of 27 Member States have transposed the Victims’ Rights Directive into national legislation as of September 2017. The Commission has started 16 infringement procedures against Member States that are still not fully compliant in practice.

Parliament noted the successful implementation by some Member States of certain provisions of the Victims’ Rights Directive, namely: the right to interpretation and translation, the right to be heard, the protection of child victims, the rights of victims when making a complaint, the right to receive information from the first contact with a competent authority.

Despite many changes introduced in Member States, victims still often lack awareness of their rights , undermining the Victims’ Rights Directive’s effectiveness on the ground and in particular the access to information requirement.

Members deplored, however, the remaining important shortcomings in the transposition and implementation of the directive in many Member States, in particular as regards:

the complexity of procedures for accessing support services; the victim support system, including insufficient access to legal aid and compensation, lack of financial support and coordination between support services, and inconsistent referral mechanisms, the fact that clear information is often not provided in more than one language, making it difficult, de facto, for victims to seek protection abroad in another Member State; the lack of a legislative foot-hold in cross-border cases and the rights of victims resident in other Member States, and failure to take measures to ensure that the lack of or uncertain residence status poses no barrier to victims’ ability to assert their rights under this directive.

In this regard, Member States are called on to:

promote easy access to justice and adequate legal aid free of charge , as this contributes greatly to breaking the silence and increasing the victim’s trust in the criminal justice system; implement and effectively enforce the right to information for all victims and potential victims; guarantee access for non-resident victims of crime to support services and information concerning their rights, and to adopt specific measures that focus in particular on the rights of all victims to compensation and within criminal proceedings; reinforce the rights of victims of hate crimes, including those against LGBTI persons or with racist motives; properly implement in their legislation timely individual assessments of the victims, including during their initial contact with a competent authority if necessary, as an essential procedural step for recognising and identifying a victim’s specific needs, to then grant specific protection in accordance with those needs, and to prevent secondary and repeat victimisation, intimidation and retaliation; provide adequate support for vulnerable groups, such as children, women victims of gender-based violence, the victims of human trafficking, LGBTI people and people with disabilities; increase the number and improve the accessibility of, women’s shelters and women’s centres , assisting the female victims of all types of gender-based violence, and to ensure that women survivors of violence are never declined a place; women’s shelters should help all women facing violence in close relationships, and should be available 24/7 and free of charge for women and their children, so that women can feel safe and able to report gender-based violence; pay particular attention to the individual assessment of children and the child victims of any form of crime, in particular human trafficking, including for sexual exploitation, of gender-based violence and of sexual abuse and exploitation; ensure that the 112 emergency hotline is fully accessible to disabled persons and that campaigns are launched to raise awareness of it.

Training : Parliament stressed that ensuring further training programmes at EU level is of paramount importance for the harmonisation and standardisation of procedures across the Member States and for ensuring equal treatment for European citizens.

Specialised training should be provided for those responsible for assisting the victims of terrorist acts, and to grant the necessary resources to that effect. In this regard, Member States are encouraged to adequately use EU funding for these training purposes.

Cross-border dimension : Parliament called on the Member States to provide financial and legal aid to family members in the event of a serious crime taking place in a different Member State to where the victim is resident, particularly in cases where the family cannot afford to travel to that Member State to attend court, to pay for psychological support or to bring the victim home.

Institutional perspective : Member States are called on to establish coordinated mechanisms for collecting information on the victims of terrorist attacks taking place in their territory, and, through the creation and development of a one-stop shop , to provide victims with a web portal and emergency telephone line or other means of communication, such as e-mail or multimedia messaging tools, giving access to secure, personalised, specific and relevant information in accordance with the user’s needs, with a confidential, free-of-charge and easily accessible support service.

In the event of a terrorist attack, a coordination centre should be established in order to bring together organisations and experts with the necessary expertise to provide information, support and practical services to the victims and to their families and relatives. These services should include specialist emotional and psychological support and vocational rehabilitation services.

The resolution called on the Commission to propose the creation of a European fund for assistance to the victims of terrorism .

Member States are called on to establish a permanent dedicated website on which all public information on the support services established following a terrorist attack that has taken place in that Member State can be accessed, and which should include information regarding the attack, getting in touch with missing victims and measures to help victims to return home, on how to obtain financial assistance, compensation or government benefits, etc.

Lastly, Parliament called on the Member States to implement efficiently, with sufficient economic and financial resources and in full cooperation with the Commission and other relevant actors, including civil society, all provisions of the Victims’ Rights Directive.

Documents
2018/05/30
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/05/29
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/05/14
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted the joint report by Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO (EPP, ES) and Angelika MLINAR (ALDE, AT) on the implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime.

The report has been adopted pursuant to Rule 55 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (Joint committee meetings).

As a reminder, Directive 2012/29/EU seeks to place the victim of a crime at the centre of the criminal justice system, and aims to strengthen the rights of victims of crime so that any victim can rely on the same level of rights, irrespective of where the offence took place, their nationality or residence status.

Assessment of the implementation of the directive : 23 out of 27 Member States have transposed the Victims’ Rights Directive into national legislation as of September 2017. The Commission has started 16 infringement procedures against Member States that are still not fully compliant in practice.

Members noted the successful implementation by some Member States of certain provisions of the Victims’ Rights Directive, namely: the right to interpretation and translation, the right to be heard, the protection of child victims, the rights of victims when making a complaint, the right to receive information from the first contact with a competent authority.

Despite many changes introduced in Member States, victims still often lack awareness of their rights, undermining the Victims’ Rights Directive’s effectiveness on the ground and in particular the access to information requirement.

Members deplored, however, the remaining important shortcomings in the transposition and implementation of the directive in many Member States, in particular as regards:

the complexity of procedures for accessing support services; the victim support system, including insufficient access to legal aid and compensation, lack of financial support and coordination between support services, and inconsistent referral mechanisms, the fact that clear information is often not provided in more than one language, making it difficult, de facto, for victims to seek protection abroad in another Member State; the lack of a legislative foot-hold in cross-border cases and the rights of victims resident in other Member States, and failure to take measures to ensure that the lack of or uncertain residence status poses no barrier to victims’ ability to assert their rights under this directive.

In this regard, Member States are called on to:

promote easy access to justice and adequate legal aid free of charge , as this contributes greatly to breaking the silence and increasing the victim’s trust in the criminal justice system, decreases the possibility of impunity and enables the victim to begin the process of psychological recovery; implement and effectively enforce the right to information for all victims and potential victims; guarantee access for non-resident victims of crime to support services and information concerning their rights, and to adopt specific measures that focus in particular on the rights of all victims to compensation and within criminal proceedings; reinforce the rights of victims of hate crimes, including those against LGBTI persons or with racist motives; properly implement in their legislation timely individual assessments of the victims, including during their initial contact with a competent authority if necessary, as an essential procedural step for recognising and identifying a victim’s specific needs, to then grant specific protection in accordance with those needs, and to prevent secondary and repeat victimisation, intimidation and retaliation; provide adequate support for vulnerable groups, such as children, women victims of gender-based violence, the victims of human trafficking, LGBTI people and people with disabilities; increase the number and improve the accessibility of, women’s shelters and women’s centres , assisting the female victims of all types of gender-based violence, and to ensure that women survivors of violence are never declined a place; women’s shelters should help all women facing violence in close relationships, and should be available 24/7 and free of charge for women and their children, so that women can feel safe and able to report gender-based violence; pay particular attention to the individual assessment of children and the child victims of any form of crime, in particular human trafficking, including for sexual exploitation, of gender-based violence and of sexual abuse and exploitation; adequately use EU funding for these training purposes.

Institutional perspective : Member States are called on to establish coordinated mechanisms for collecting information on the victims of terrorist attacks taking place in their territory, and, through the creation and development of a one-stop shop , to provide victims with a web portal and emergency telephone line or other means of communication, such as e-mail or multimedia messaging tools, giving access to secure, personalised, specific and relevant information in accordance with the user’s needs, with a confidential, free-of-charge and easily accessible support service.

In the event of a terrorist attack, a coordination centre should be established in order to bring together organisations and experts with the necessary expertise to provide information, support and practical services to the victims and to their families and relatives. These services should include specialist emotional and psychological support and vocational rehabilitation services.

The report called on the Commission to propose the creation of a European fund for assistance to the victims of terrorism .

Member States are called on to establish a permanent dedicated website on which all public information on the support services established following a terrorist attack that has taken place in that Member State can be accessed, and which should include information regarding the attack, getting in touch with missing victims and measures to help victims to return home, on how to obtain financial assistance, compensation or government benefits, etc.

Lastly, Members called on the Member States to implement efficiently, with sufficient economic and financial resources and in full cooperation with the Commission and other relevant actors, including civil society, all provisions of the Victims’ Rights Directive.

Documents
2018/04/26
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/03/09
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/02/26
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/01/31
   EP - JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO Teresa (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ['LIBE', 'FEMM']
2017/01/31
   EP - MLINAR Angelika (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ['LIBE', 'FEMM']
2017/01/19
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2017/01/19
   EP - Referral to joint committee announced in Parliament

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - § 18 30/05/2018 13:37:17.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 643, 0: 21, -: 3
DE FR IT GB ES PL RO NL BE SE PT AT CZ EL HU BG FI HR SK LT IE LV MT EE DK CY LU SI ??
Total
84
71
64
67
49
46
28
26
20
19
21
18
18
16
14
12
12
11
11
10
10
8
6
5
7
5
4
3
1
icon: PPE PPE
184

United Kingdom PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
166

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Greece S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

Germany NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

4

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1

A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - § 43/2 30/05/2018 13:37:52.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 521, -: 109, 0: 30
IT DE ES FR GB RO SE BE PT AT NL FI CZ HU IE EL LT MT LU LV HR CY BG EE SI SK DK ?? PL
Total
64
86
47
71
66
27
19
20
20
18
26
12
18
12
9
14
10
6
5
8
11
5
13
5
3
11
7
1
45
icon: S&D S&D
166

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Hungary S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
178

United Kingdom PPE

For (1)

1
3

Greece PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Germany ECR

Abstain (1)

4

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Denmark ECR

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
18

Germany NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - § 60/2 30/05/2018 13:38:15.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 513, -: 101, 0: 38
DE IT ES FR GB RO PT BE SE NL BG FI CZ IE HU LV EL LT LU CY HR DK EE SI SK ?? AT MT PL
Total
81
63
45
69
64
27
20
20
19
26
13
12
18
10
13
8
15
10
5
5
11
7
5
3
11
1
18
6
46
icon: S&D S&D
166

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Greece S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
175

United Kingdom PPE

2

Greece PPE

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Germany ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
2

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

3

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - Considérant N 30/05/2018 13:38:27.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 523, -: 78, 0: 55
DE ES IT FR RO GB PT NL SE PL BE HU CZ BG IE FI HR LT EL SK LV EE CY LU MT DK SI ?? AT
Total
83
49
61
70
28
66
20
26
19
43
19
14
17
13
10
12
11
10
16
11
8
5
5
4
6
7
3
1
18
icon: PPE PPE
181

United Kingdom PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
161

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Greece S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: NI NI
18

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

4

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - Considérant O/1 30/05/2018 13:38:38.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 571, 0: 60, -: 29
DE FR IT ES GB RO PL PT SE NL BE CZ BG FI HU IE LT EL AT SK LV LU EE CY MT HR DK SI ??
Total
82
69
64
48
68
28
46
21
19
26
20
18
12
12
12
10
10
16
18
11
7
5
5
5
5
11
7
3
1
icon: S&D S&D
167

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Greece S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
182

United Kingdom PPE

2

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Malta PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
2

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1

A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio et Angelika Mlinar - Considérant O/2 30/05/2018 13:38:48.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 517, -: 91, 0: 52
DE ES FR GB RO IT PT PL NL SE BE HU CZ BG IE FI EL LT SK MT LU EE CY LV HR DK SI AT ??
Total
82
47
70
67
28
63
21
46
26
19
20
14
18
13
10
11
16
10
11
6
5
5
5
8
9
7
3
18
1
icon: S&D S&D
164

Netherlands S&D

3

Hungary S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
181

United Kingdom PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Croatia PPE

For (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Romania ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2