BETA


2016/2532(RSP) Resolution on traceability of fishery and aquaculture products in restaurants and retail

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead PECH
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2016/05/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/05/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Fisheries on traceability of fishery and aquaculture products in restaurants and retail.

Recalling that consumers should be able to fully rely on the whole chain that provides fishery products in the EU market, Members expressed serious concern at the results of various studies showing significant levels of mislabelling on fish products sold on the EU market, including in the restaurants of the EU institutions. They reaffirmed that the intentional and fraudulent mislabelling of fish species is a breach of EU regulations , including the Common Fisheries Policy, and may constitute a criminal offence under national law.

Strengthen controls : Parliament called on Member States to strengthen national controls, including on non-processed fish for restaurants and the catering sector, in an effort to tackle fraud and identify the stage in the supply chain where fish is mislabelled.

It called on the Commission to monitor on a regular basis the extent to which the required information appears on labels, which must provide understandable, verifiable and accurate information.

In the context of voluntary labelling, Parliament urged Member States to state all available information that enables the consumer to make an informed choice. It also urged the Commission and the Member States to strengthen awareness-raising campaigns on labelling requirements for fishery and aquaculture products.

Strong traceability system : drawing attention to the need to include information on the origin of fishery products in a transparent and clear manner, Parliament asked the Commission and the Member States to study what measures could be put in place to improve the traceability of fishery and aquaculture products. It supported a strong traceability system, from landing to consumption, which would give confidence to consumers and, in turn, decrease commercial dependency on imported fishery and aquaculture products. It called on the Commission to exploit the potential of DNA barcoding, which could assist in the identification of species by DNA sequencing, in order to enhance traceability.

Members supported the creation of a working group to harmonise the implementation of traceability in all Member States and the setting-up of an external structure enabling the certification of voluntary claims for fishery and aquaculture products on the EU market.

European labelling policy : Parliament felt that such a strategy in the fisheries sector would be a key factor in boosting the economic development of coastal communities, in recognising the best practices of fishermen and in underlining the quality of the products they supply to consumers. It asked the Commission to submit a feasibility report on options for an eco-label scheme for fishery and aquaculture products. The key elements of the labelling system must ensure transparency, independence and credibility of the certification process.

Confusion regarding European fishing zones : Parliament called on the Commission to adopt measures to remedy the confusion caused by the current labelling requirements based on Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) areas and sub-areas, which is particularly serious in the case of catches in some sub-areas of area 27, where inter alia Galicia and the Gulf of Cádiz are labelled as ‘Portuguese Waters’, Wales as ‘Irish Sea’ and Brittany as ‘Bay of Biscay’.

Any future Union-wide ecolabel and third-party seafood ecolabelling and certification schemes should be consistent with the FAO’s Guidelines for the Ecolabelling of Fish and Fishery Products from Marine Capture Fisheries.

Documents
2016/05/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/05/09
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents
2016/05/09
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2016/05/09
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/03/03
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents

Documents

Activities

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.070
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-577070_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0581_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0581_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160509&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-05-09-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2016-05-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0222_EN.html title: T8-0222/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-05-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0222_EN.html title: T8-0222/2016
summary
committees/0/date
    docs/2/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0581&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0581_EN.html
    events/2/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0222
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0222_EN.html
    committees/0
    type
    Responsible Committee
    body
    EP
    committee_full
    Fisheries
    committee
    PECH
    associated
    False
    date
    committees/0
    body
    EP
    responsible
    True
    committee_full
    Fisheries
    committee
    PECH
    docs/0
    date
    2016-03-03T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.070 title: PE577.070
    type
    Amendments tabled in committee
    body
    EP
    activities
    • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160509&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0222 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0222/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    commission
    • body: EC dg: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries commissioner: VELLA Karmenu
    docs
    • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0365/2016 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0581&language=EN title: B8-0581/2016 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    events
    • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160509&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27219&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0222 title: T8-0222/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Fisheries on traceability of fishery and aquaculture products in restaurants and retail. Recalling that consumers should be able to fully rely on the whole chain that provides fishery products in the EU market, Members expressed serious concern at the results of various studies showing significant levels of mislabelling on fish products sold on the EU market, including in the restaurants of the EU institutions. They reaffirmed that the intentional and fraudulent mislabelling of fish species is a breach of EU regulations , including the Common Fisheries Policy, and may constitute a criminal offence under national law. Strengthen controls : Parliament called on Member States to strengthen national controls, including on non-processed fish for restaurants and the catering sector, in an effort to tackle fraud and identify the stage in the supply chain where fish is mislabelled. It called on the Commission to monitor on a regular basis the extent to which the required information appears on labels, which must provide understandable, verifiable and accurate information. In the context of voluntary labelling, Parliament urged Member States to state all available information that enables the consumer to make an informed choice. It also urged the Commission and the Member States to strengthen awareness-raising campaigns on labelling requirements for fishery and aquaculture products. Strong traceability system : drawing attention to the need to include information on the origin of fishery products in a transparent and clear manner, Parliament asked the Commission and the Member States to study what measures could be put in place to improve the traceability of fishery and aquaculture products. It supported a strong traceability system, from landing to consumption, which would give confidence to consumers and, in turn, decrease commercial dependency on imported fishery and aquaculture products. It called on the Commission to exploit the potential of DNA barcoding, which could assist in the identification of species by DNA sequencing, in order to enhance traceability. Members supported the creation of a working group to harmonise the implementation of traceability in all Member States and the setting-up of an external structure enabling the certification of voluntary claims for fishery and aquaculture products on the EU market. European labelling policy : Parliament felt that such a strategy in the fisheries sector would be a key factor in boosting the economic development of coastal communities, in recognising the best practices of fishermen and in underlining the quality of the products they supply to consumers. It asked the Commission to submit a feasibility report on options for an eco-label scheme for fishery and aquaculture products. The key elements of the labelling system must ensure transparency, independence and credibility of the certification process. Confusion regarding European fishing zones : Parliament called on the Commission to adopt measures to remedy the confusion caused by the current labelling requirements based on Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) areas and sub-areas, which is particularly serious in the case of catches in some sub-areas of area 27, where inter alia Galicia and the Gulf of Cádiz are labelled as ‘Portuguese Waters’, Wales as ‘Irish Sea’ and Brittany as ‘Bay of Biscay’. Any future Union-wide ecolabel and third-party seafood ecolabelling and certification schemes should be consistent with the FAO’s Guidelines for the Ecolabelling of Fish and Fishery Products from Marine Capture Fisheries.
    • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries commissioner: VELLA Karmenu
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    PECH/8/05296
    New
    • PECH/8/05296
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.15.01 Fish stocks, conservation of fishery resources
    • 3.15.02 Aquaculture
    • 3.70.17 European eco-label and eco-labelling
    • 4.60.02 Consumer information, advertising, labelling
    New
    3.15.01
    Fish stocks, conservation of fishery resources
    3.15.02
    Aquaculture
    3.70.17
    European ecolabel and ecolabelling, ecodesign
    4.60.02
    Consumer information, advertising, labelling
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Debate or resolution on oral questions
    New
    Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
    procedure/title
    Old
    Traceability of fishery and aquaculture products in restauration and retail
    New
    Resolution on traceability of fishery and aquaculture products in restaurants and retail
    activities/1/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0222 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0222/2016
    activities/1/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/0/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160509&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/0/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2016-05-10T00:00:00
    New
    2016-05-12T00:00:00
    activities
    • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in plenary scheduled
    • date: 2016-05-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries commissioner: VELLA Karmenu
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    PECH/8/05296
    reference
    2016/2532(RSP)
    title
    Traceability of fishery and aquaculture products in restauration and retail
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
    stage_reached
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    subtype
    Debate or resolution on oral questions
    type
    RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
    subject