2016/2981(RSP) | [ParlTrack]

Changes: 2021/12/18events.type, procedure.Other_legal_basis, procedure.Modified_legal_basis, docs.docs.url, 2020/01/19docs.docs.url, 2019/07/06procedure.subtype, procedure.Modified_legal_basis, events, activities, committees, procedure.subject, docs, links, other

View current state | View Changes for this date

General Activities Documents History

2016/2981(RSP) Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed agreement between Canada and the EU on a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)

Subjects

Links

Activites

2016/11/23 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2019-07-06Show (9) Changes | Timetravel

activities	date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
docs	date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-1220&language=EN title: B8-1220/2016 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
events	date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27863&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The European Parliament rejected by 225 votes to 439, with 35 abstentions, a motion for a resolution pursuant to Rule 108(6) of the Rules of Procedure seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed agreement between Canada and the European Union on a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). Members at the origin of the draft resolution (89 in total) stated that the agreement submitted to the Council to be concluded, signed and provisionally applied contains a chapter on investment (chapter eight), which includes, inter alia, a section on investment protection (Section D) and a section on the resolution of investment disputes between investors and states (Section F). The draft resolution suggested that the Parliament seek an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility of the proposed agreement with the Treaties . Members took the view that there is legal uncertainty as to whether the proposed agreement is compatible with the Treaties, in particular Article 19 of the Treaty on European Union as well as Articles 49, 54, 56, 267 and 340 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
procedure/Modified legal basis	Old Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 108-p6 New Rules of Procedure EP 114-p6
procedure/subject	Old 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations 8.30 Treaties in general New 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations 8.30 Treaties in general
procedure/subtype	Old Resolution on statements New Resolution on statement

2016-11-26Show (2) Changes | Timetravel

activities/0/type	Old Vote in plenary scheduled New Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached	Old Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage New Procedure rejected

2016-11-22Show (5) Changes

activities	date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
committees
links
other
procedure	reference 2016/2981(RSP) title Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed agreement between Canada and the EU on a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) geographical_area Canada stage_reached Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage subtype Resolution on statements Modified legal basis Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 108-p6 type RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects subject 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations 8.30 Treaties in general

Activites

Documents

History

ParlTrack - 2011-2024