Progress: Awaiting Parliament 2nd reading
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | FERRANDINO Giuseppe ( S&D) | THALER Barbara ( EPP), RIQUET Dominique ( Renew), DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG Anna ( Verts/ALE), HAIDER Roman ( ID), PORĘBA Tomasz Piotr ( ECR), PIMENTA LOPES João ( GUE/NGL) |
Former Responsible Committee | TRAN | REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY Christine ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ENVI | DANCE Seb ( S&D) | Stefan ECK ( GUE/NGL), Andrzej GRZYB ( PPE), Gesine MEISSNER ( ALDE), Keith TAYLOR ( Verts/ALE) |
Former Committee Opinion | ECON |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 091-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 091-p1Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 398 votes to 179, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Tolls and user charges : the proposed Directive aims to help meet EU emission reduction targets for the transport sector and make road user charges fairer. Since distance-based pricing (tolls) rather than time-based pricing (vignettes) better reflects actual use, emission levels and pollution, the draft Directive would phase out time-based pricing systems after an appropriate transitional phase.
Parliament considered that road charging imposed by Member States would need to become distanced-based from 2023 for heavy-duty vehicles and larger goods vans with a maximum permissible laden mass of between 2.4 and 3.5 tonnes and a height of more than 2 metres and from end of 2027 for light duty vehicles , meaning vans and minibuses.
As of 1 January 2020 , tolls and user charges applied to heavy duty vehicles shall apply to all heavy duty vehicles and vans intended for the carriage of goods.
User rights (proportionality and equal treatment) : the proportionality of user charges may take into consideration the specific characteristic of transport operations which start in a Member State on the periphery of the EU.
According to the amended text, road networks covered by an infrastructure charge shall offer a high level of road safety and be equipped with all the necessary infrastructure, such as safe parking areas in all weather conditions, to comply with the obligations laid down in the Regulation on rest periods and driving times.
External cost charging : from 1 January 2021, Member States that levy tolls shall apply an external-cost charge for traffic-based air or noise pollution to heavy duty vehicles and to vans intended for the carriage of goods on all parts of the network referred to in the Directive that are subject to an infrastructure charge.
From 1 January 2026 onwards, an external-cost charge imposed on any section of the road network shall apply in a non-discriminatory manner to all vehicle categories. Member States may apply derogations which allow external-cost charges to be adjusted for vehicles of historical interest .
Congestion charging : Members proposed that congestion charges may be introduced or maintained independently from infrastructure charges. Member States may, however, decide to exempt buses and coaches for the promotion of collective transport and socio-economic development and territorial cohesion
Mark-up : the mark-up does shall not exceed 15 % of the weighted average infrastructure charge, except in mountainous areas, where infrastructure costs as well as climate and environmental damage are higher, in which case the mark-up may not exceed 50 % .
Variation in charges : Parliament proposed that from the date of entry into force of this Directive, zero-emission vehicles shall benefit from infrastructure charges reduced by 50 % compared to the lowest rate. Zero-emission operation shall benefit from the same reduction, provided that such operation can be proved.
Member States may take into account the improvement of the environmental performance of the vehicle which is linked to that vehicle’s conversion to alternative fuels . A standing subscription or any other mechanism approved by the toll system’s operator should allow users to benefit from a variation in toll charges that rewards the improved environmental performance of the vehicle, after conversion.
Discounts : for heavy duty vehicles and vans intended for the carriage of goods, Member States may provide for discounts or reductions to the infrastructure charge on condition that such discounts or reductions do not exceed 20 % of the infrastructure charge paid by equivalent vehicles not eligible for the discount or reduction and those used for local or habitual transport, or both.
For light vehicles, in particular for frequent users on the areas of dispersed settlements and the outskirts of cities, Member States may provide for discounts or reductions to the infrastructure charge provided that such discounts contribute to social cohesion and ensure the mobility of peripheral regions or remote areas.
Member States or competent authorities may introduce a kilometre-based flat-rate exemption on a specific road section, taking into account the mobility patterns and economic interest of peripheral regions.
In mountain areas and peripheral regions , Member States or competent authorities may vary toll rates for heavy vehicles according to distance travelled by the tolled vehicles to minimise socio-economic impacts.
Use of revenues : revenues generated from infrastructure and external costs charges, or the equivalent in financial value of these revenues, shall be used to carry out road network maintenance and upkeep, and to optimise the entire transport system.
Revenues shall be used to: (i) reduce air and noise pollution from road transport; (ii) finance collective and sustainable modes of transport; (iii) develop alternative fuel infrastructures; (iv) support the trans-European transport network and eliminating bottlenecks.
Lastly, Members proposed to establish in each Member State an independent supervisory authority for infrastructure charging responsible for ensuring compliance with this Directive.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY (S&D, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, exercising its prerogative as an associated committee in accordance with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure, also gave its opinion on the report.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Tolls and user charges : since distance-based pricing (tolls) rather than time-based pricing (vignettes) better reflects actual usage, emission levels and pollution, the Commission proposed to phase out time-based pricing schemes after an appropriate transitional phase. Members considered that road pricing imposed by Member States should be based on distance from 2026 for passenger cars (two years earlier than was proposed by the European Commission) and from 2023 for heavy goods vehicles and vans for the transport of goods.
Members considered that road networks covered by an infrastructure charge must afford a high level of road safety, together with all necessary infrastructure facilities, such as safe and secure parking areas, for compliance with the obligations laid down by the regulation on rest periods and driving times.
User rights (proportionality and equal treatment) : the proportionality of user charges may take into consideration the specific characteristic of transport operations which start in a Member State on the periphery of the EU. As of 1 January 2020, tolls and user charges applied to heavy duty vehicles shall apply to all heavy duty vehicles, as well as to all vans intended for the carriage of goods fitted with a tachograph.
External cost charging : from 1 January 2021, Member States that levy tolls shall apply an external-cost charge for traffic-based air or noise pollution to heavy duty vehicles and to vans intended for the carriage of goods on all parts of the network referred to in Article 7(1) that are subject to an infrastructure charge.
From 1 January 2026 onwards, an external-cost charge imposed on any section of the road network shall apply in a non-discriminatory manner to all vehicle categories. Member States may apply derogations which allow external-cost charges to be adjusted for vehicles of historical interest.
Congestion charging : Members proposed that congestion charges may be introduced or maintained independently from infrastructure charges. Member States may, however, decide to exempt buses and coaches for the promotion of collective transport and socio-economic development and territorial cohesion.
The level of charges shall be reviewed annually to ensure that they are not higher than the cost of congestion occurring in that Member State and generated on those road sections, which are subject to the congestion charge.
Mark-up : the increase should not exceed 15% of the weighted average infrastructure charge, except in mountainous regions, where infrastructure costs as well as climatic and environmental damage are higher, in which case the increase may not exceed 50%.
Variation in charges : Members proposed that from the date of entry into force of this Directive, zero-emission vehicles shall benefit from infrastructure charges reduced by 50 % compared to the lowest rate . Zero-emission operation shall benefit from the same reduction, provided that such operation can be proved.
Member States may take into account the improvement of the environmental performance of the vehicle which is linked to that vehicle’s conversion to alternative fuels. A standing subscription or any other mechanism approved by the toll system’s operator should allow users to benefit from a variation in toll charges that rewards the improved environmental performance of the vehicle, after conversion.
Discounts : for light vehicles, in particular for frequent users on the areas of dispersed settlements and the outskirts of cities , Member States may provide for discounts or reductions to the infrastructure charge provided that such discounts contribute to social cohesion and ensure the mobility of peripheral regions or remote areas.
Member States or competent authorities may introduce a kilometre-based flat-rate exemption on a specific road section, taking into account the mobility patterns and economic interest of peripheral regions.
In mountain areas and peripheral regions , Member States or competent authorities may vary toll rates for heavy vehicles according to distance travelled by the tolled vehicles to minimise socio-economic impacts.
Use of revenues : to enable the transport network to be developed as a whole, revenues generated from infrastructure and external costs charges, or the equivalent in financial value of these revenues, shall be used to carry out road network maintenance and upkeep, and to optimise the entire transport system .
Revenues shall be used to: (i) reduce air and noise pollution from road transport; (ii) finance collective and sustainable modes of transport; (iii) develop alternative fuel infrastructures; (iv) support the trans-European transport network and eliminating bottlenecks.
Members proposed that the revenue from charges be used on the territory containing the road section on which they applied.
Member States should clearly indicate how the revenue generated by road user charges is used . They should publish the results of reinvesting infrastructure charges and external costs, as well as the benefits in terms of increased road safety, a reduced environmental impact and reduced traffic congestion.
Lastly, Members proposed to establish in each Member State an independent authority to supervise toll systems and to guarantee all road users a high level of information on how revenues are used.
PURPOSE: to improve the application of the "polluter pays" and "user pays" principles to promote sustainable road transport.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament shall decide in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: this initiative is part of the Commission's efforts to create an energy union and from a series of proposals on low-emission transport. It is a follow-up to the Communication " A European strategy for low-emission mobility ".
CO2 emissions from road transport in 2014 were still 17% higher than in 1990. The highest share of these emissions originates from passenger cars (over 60%). Under current trends, the emission reduction will not be sufficient to achieve the EU goals set for 2030 and 2050. Moreover, road infrastructure is degrading in many Member States.
Road pricing can be a key incentive for cleaner and more efficient transport operations. Progress towards the Commission's objective of applying the "polluter pays" and "user pays" principles has been slow. There are still inconsistencies in the application of road pricing across the EU.
Directive 1999/62/EC provides the legal framework for charging heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) for the use of certain roads. So far, however, the Directive does not contain elements specifically contributing to the reduction of CO2 emissions from transport. Moreover, it only applies to HGVs, all other vehicles are left unaddressed.
It is for this reason that the Commission proposed to include buses, passenger cars and vans in the scope of the Directive, thereby ensuring more consistent pricing of infrastructure use across the road transport sector.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option provides for the variation of charges for light vehicles according to their CO2 and pollutant emissions, as the preferred option, possibly complemented with the requirement of external cost charging on at least part of the network for HDVs and the phasing-out of time-based charging for light vehicles over a sufficiently long period.
CONTENT: the proposal aims at addressing the shortcomings of existing legislation (Directive 1999/62/EC) , i.e. at a better fulfilment of the legislation's objectives.
Scope : it is proposed to extend the scope of the application of the Directive to include light duty vehicles such as minibuses, passenger cars, vans and coaches.
Tolls and user charges : provisions on non-discrimination, proportionality of charges and on the collection and payment of tolls and user charges shall not only apply to networks mainly used by international traffic (the trans-European road network and motorways) but to other roads . Given that distance-based pricing (tolls) rather than duration (tags) better reflects actual use, emission levels and pollution, the Commission proposes to phasing out tariff systems based on (2023 for heavy-duty vehicles, 2027 for other categories of vehicles). The possibility of exempting heavy goods vehicles weighing less than 12 tonnes from road charging would be abolished and the scope of any tariff system would be extended to coaches / buses.
External cost charging : it is proposed that the maximum weighted average external-cost charges should be replaced by readily applicable reference values updated in light of inflation, the scientific progress made in estimating the external costs of road transport and the evolution of the fleet composition. From 1 January 2021, Member States that levy tolls shall apply an external-cost charge to heavy duty vehicles on at least the part of the network where environmental damage generated by heavy duty vehicles is the most important.
Congestion charging : the proposal allows the application of congestion charges on top of the infrastructure charge. Any such congestion charge has to be applied to all vehicle categories in a proportionate and even-handed manner.
Revenues from congestion charges should be used to address congestion problems, for example by supporting alternative transport solutions or removing bottlenecks.
Moreover, the possibility of applying mark-ups would be extended and would no longer be restricted to mountainous regions alone.
Variation of charges : as regards heavy duty vehicles, it is proposed to phase out the variation of charges according to the Euro emission class of the vehicle. Modalities for the variation of tolls and user charges according to the environmental performance of passenger cars, minibuses and vans have been specified. The variation shall be based on emissions of both CO2 and air pollutants, as specified in Annex VII. This provision should incentivise the use of cleaner and more efficient vehicles.
Notifications : it is proposed to simplify the prior information of the Commission in respect of intended external cost charging, by confining the information to basic elements.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Documents
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE700.698
- Council position: 10542/1/2021
- Committee draft report: PE700.379
- Commission communication on Council's position: EUR-Lex
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2021)0693
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)755
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0423/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0202/2018
- Committee opinion: PE613.289
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.188
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE615.519
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.222
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3560/2017
- Committee draft report: PE615.363
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2888/2017
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
- Reasoned opinion: PE609.367
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
- Legislative proposal: COM(2017)0275
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0180
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0181
- Legislative proposal: COM(2017)0275 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0180
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0181
- Reasoned opinion: PE609.367
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2888/2017
- Committee draft report: PE615.363
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3560/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE615.519
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.222
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.188
- Committee opinion: PE613.289
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)755
- Committee draft report: PE700.379
- Commission communication on Council's position: EUR-Lex COM(2021)0693
- Council position: 10542/1/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE700.698
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
- Contribution: COM(2017)0275
Activities
- Michael CRAMER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Claudia SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabella DE MONTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Karoline GRASWANDER-HAINZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Merja KYLLÖNEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christelle LETARD-LECHEVALIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Innocenzo LEONTINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jill SEYMOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 150 25/10/2018 12:21:17.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 172 25/10/2018 12:21:33.000 #
PL | RO | GB | BG | HU | CZ | SI | LV | AT | CY | ?? | EL | SK | DK | HR | PT | EE | FI | IE | LT | LU | MT | SE | BE | NL | FR | DE | IT | ES | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
43
|
25
|
55
|
14
|
14
|
17
|
7
|
6
|
18
|
4
|
2
|
16
|
12
|
5
|
9
|
17
|
5
|
11
|
7
|
9
|
6
|
6
|
19
|
20
|
22
|
68
|
83
|
53
|
44
|
|
ECR |
59
|
1
|
14
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Germany ECRFor (6) |
2
|
||||||||||||||
ENF |
31
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
France ENFFor (15) |
1
|
Italy ENF |
||||||||||||||||||||||
PPE |
173
|
Poland PPEFor (18)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Julia PITERA, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Abstain (1) |
Romania PPEFor (8)Against (3) |
2
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (6) |
Hungary PPEFor (9) |
Czechia PPEFor (6) |
5
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
Slovakia PPEFor (2)Against (3) |
4
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (2) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Geoffroy DIDIER,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
Germany PPEFor (17)Against (10) |
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
Spain PPEAgainst (11) |
||
EFDD |
35
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (14) |
1
|
1
|
France EFDDFor (6) |
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (11) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Greece NIFor (5) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
37
|
1
|
2
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (2)Abstain (3) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (5) |
2
|
||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (11) |
1
|
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||||
ALDE |
57
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
3
|
Spain ALDEAgainst (6) |
|||||||||
S&D |
164
|
Poland S&D |
9
|
United Kingdom S&DAgainst (17) |
Bulgaria S&DFor (2)Against (2) |
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Sweden S&DAgainst (6) |
4
|
3
|
France S&DAgainst (12)Abstain (1) |
Germany S&DAgainst (25)
Arndt KOHN,
Arne LIETZ,
Bernd LANGE,
Birgit SIPPEL,
Constanze KREHL,
Dietmar KÖSTER,
Evelyne GEBHARDT,
Iris HOFFMANN,
Ismail ERTUG,
Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER,
Jens GEIER,
Joachim SCHUSTER,
Kerstin WESTPHAL,
Knut FLECKENSTEIN,
Maria NOICHL,
Martina WERNER,
Michael DETJEN,
Norbert NEUSER,
Peter SIMON,
Petra KAMMEREVERT,
Susanne MELIOR,
Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN,
Tiemo WÖLKEN,
Udo BULLMANN,
Ulrike RODUST
Abstain (1) |
Italy S&DAgainst (24)
Andrea COZZOLINO,
Brando BENIFEI,
Caterina CHINNICI,
Damiano ZOFFOLI,
Daniele VIOTTI,
David Maria SASSOLI,
Elena GENTILE,
Elly SCHLEIN,
Enrico GASBARRA,
Flavio ZANONATO,
Giuseppe FERRANDINO,
Isabella DE MONTE,
Luigi MORGANO,
Massimo PAOLUCCI,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Michela GIUFFRIDA,
Nicola CAPUTO,
Nicola DANTI,
Paolo DE CASTRO,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pier Antonio PANZERI,
Renata BRIANO,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
|
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 135 25/10/2018 12:22:55.000 #
ES | EL | PT | SE | DE | DK | CY | ?? | MT | BE | EE | SK | LU | AT | CZ | GB | LV | IT | FI | HR | IE | SI | LT | NL | BG | HU | FR | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
45
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
83
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
6
|
20
|
5
|
12
|
6
|
18
|
17
|
55
|
6
|
53
|
11
|
9
|
7
|
7
|
8
|
21
|
14
|
14
|
69
|
26
|
42
|
|
S&D |
165
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
Sweden S&DFor (4)Abstain (2) |
Germany S&DFor (26)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Joachim SCHUSTER, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Michael DETJEN, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
Austria S&D |
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (17) |
1
|
Italy S&DFor (8)Against (16) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Romania S&DFor (1)Against (9) |
Poland S&D |
|||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
4
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
38
|
Spain GUE/NGLFor (6)Against (3) |
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
4
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (1) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
France GUE/NGL |
|||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (5)Against (9) |
Italy EFDDFor (11) |
France EFDDAgainst (2) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
16
|
Greece NIFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
31
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
Italy ENFAgainst (5) |
4
|
France ENFAgainst (15) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
1
|
2
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||
ALDE |
57
|
Spain ALDEAgainst (4) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (2)Against (4) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
3
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
3
|
|||||||||
PPE |
173
|
Spain PPEAgainst (12)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ
|
2
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
Sweden PPE |
Germany PPEAgainst (27)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Daniel CASPARY,
David McALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (5) |
3
|
5
|
Czechia PPEFor (2)Against (2)Abstain (2) |
2
|
4
|
Italy PPEFor (2)Against (6) |
2
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
Hungary PPEAgainst (9) |
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Geoffroy DIDIER,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
Romania PPEAgainst (11) |
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Julia PITERA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 137 25/10/2018 12:23:22.000 #
EL | ES | PT | DE | CY | DK | BE | FI | ?? | SE | MT | LT | LU | AT | EE | IE | NL | HU | SK | LV | HR | SI | IT | CZ | BG | GB | FR | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
16
|
44
|
17
|
84
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
10
|
2
|
19
|
6
|
8
|
6
|
18
|
6
|
7
|
22
|
14
|
12
|
6
|
9
|
7
|
53
|
17
|
14
|
55
|
69
|
26
|
43
|
|
S&D |
164
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
Germany S&DFor (26)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Joachim SCHUSTER, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Michael DETJEN, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Sweden S&DFor (2)Abstain (4) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
Austria S&D |
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Italy S&DFor (9)Against (15) |
3
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom S&DFor (17) |
Romania S&DAgainst (10) |
Poland S&D |
|||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
38
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
4
|
Germany GUE/NGL |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
France GUE/NGL |
||||||||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
Greece NIAgainst (3)Abstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
1
|
Italy EFDD |
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
France EFDDFor (2)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
31
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
Italy ENF |
France ENFAgainst (15) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
58
|
1
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14) |
1
|
||||||||||||||
ALDE |
58
|
Spain ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (2)Against (4) |
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
3
|
|||||||||
PPE |
175
|
2
|
Spain PPEAgainst (12)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
Germany PPEAgainst (28)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Daniel CASPARY,
David McALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Sweden PPE |
3
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (9) |
Slovakia PPEAgainst (5) |
4
|
4
|
5
|
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
2
|
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Geoffroy DIDIER,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
Romania PPEAgainst (11) |
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Julia PITERA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 152 25/10/2018 12:23:39.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 153 25/10/2018 12:23:56.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 159 25/10/2018 12:25:23.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 60 25/10/2018 12:25:49.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 161S 25/10/2018 12:26:31.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 163S 25/10/2018 12:27:35.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 140 25/10/2018 12:29:52.000 #
ES | EL | DE | CY | DK | SE | LT | MT | AT | ?? | LU | EE | IE | FI | PT | HU | BE | SK | LV | IT | HR | SI | CZ | NL | BG | GB | FR | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
43
|
14
|
84
|
4
|
5
|
18
|
9
|
6
|
17
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
7
|
11
|
17
|
14
|
20
|
12
|
6
|
52
|
9
|
6
|
17
|
22
|
14
|
55
|
68
|
26
|
43
|
|
S&D |
162
|
3
|
Germany S&DFor (26)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Joachim SCHUSTER, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Michael DETJEN, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
1
|
2
|
Sweden S&DFor (2)Abstain (4) |
2
|
3
|
Austria S&D |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (1) |
3
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
Italy S&DFor (10)Against (13) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom S&DFor (17) |
Romania S&DAgainst (10) |
Poland S&D |
||||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
1
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
39
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (6) |
Germany GUE/NGL |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
France GUE/NGL |
||||||||||||||||||
NI |
14
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
35
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDD |
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
France EFDDFor (2)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
29
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Italy ENF |
4
|
France ENFAgainst (14) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
57
|
Spain ALDEFor (1)Against (4) |
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
3
|
1
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
3
|
|||||||||
ECR |
59
|
1
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14) |
1
|
||||||||||||||
PPE |
174
|
Spain PPEFor (1)Against (11) |
2
|
Germany PPEAgainst (28)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Daniel CASPARY,
David McALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
Hungary PPEAgainst (9) |
3
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (5) |
4
|
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
4
|
5
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
3
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
2
|
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Geoffroy DIDIER,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
Romania PPEAgainst (11) |
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Julia PITERA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 165S 25/10/2018 12:30:10.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 166S 25/10/2018 12:31:03.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 171S 25/10/2018 12:32:26.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 142 25/10/2018 12:32:53.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 143S 25/10/2018 12:33:07.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 144S 25/10/2018 12:34:11.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 146S 25/10/2018 12:34:46.000 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Proposition de la Commission 25/10/2018 12:36:01.000 #
DE | IT | ES | FR | RO | BE | NL | PT | SE | LT | HR | EL | SK | LU | EE | IE | FI | LV | DK | MT | SI | ?? | CY | BG | AT | HU | CZ | GB | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
83
|
51
|
44
|
69
|
26
|
20
|
22
|
17
|
18
|
9
|
9
|
13
|
12
|
6
|
6
|
7
|
11
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
6
|
2
|
4
|
13
|
17
|
13
|
17
|
55
|
43
|
|
S&D |
161
|
Germany S&DFor (26)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Joachim SCHUSTER, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Michael DETJEN, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
Italy S&DFor (23)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
|
10
|
4
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
Sweden S&D |
2
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (3)Abstain (1) |
Austria S&D |
3
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (17) |
Poland S&D |
||||
ALDE |
56
|
3
|
5
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
Netherlands ALDEAbstain (3) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
|||||||||
PPE |
173
|
Germany PPEFor (15)Against (13) |
Italy PPEFor (2) |
Spain PPEFor (11)Abstain (1) |
France PPEFor (18)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Tokia SAÏFI
|
Romania PPEFor (9)Against (2) |
3
|
3
|
Portugal PPEAbstain (1) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Slovakia PPEFor (4)Abstain (1) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
Slovenia PPEFor (2)Against (3) |
1
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
Austria PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
Hungary PPEFor (1)Against (7) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
2
|
Poland PPEFor (5)Against (13)Abstain (1) |
||
Verts/ALE |
43
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
1
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
5
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
38
|
Germany GUE/NGL |
2
|
Spain GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
France GUE/NGL |
2
|
Portugal GUE/NGLAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||
NI |
14
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
35
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (11) |
France EFDDFor (1)Against (5) |
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
29
|
1
|
4
|
France ENFAgainst (15) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
2
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14) |
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 150 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 172 #
PL | RO | GB | BG | HU | CZ | SI | LV | AT | CY | ?? | EL | SK | DK | HR | PT | EE | FI | IE | LT | LU | MT | SE | BE | NL | FR | DE | IT | ES | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
43
|
25
|
55
|
14
|
14
|
17
|
7
|
6
|
18
|
4
|
2
|
16
|
12
|
5
|
9
|
17
|
5
|
11
|
7
|
9
|
6
|
6
|
19
|
20
|
22
|
67
|
83
|
53
|
44
|
|
ECR |
59
|
1
|
14
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Germany ECRFor (6) |
2
|
||||||||||||||
ENF |
30
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
Italy ENF |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PPE |
173
|
Poland PPEFor (18)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Julia PITERA, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Abstain (1) |
Romania PPEFor (8)Against (3) |
2
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (6) |
Hungary PPEFor (9) |
Czechia PPEFor (6) |
5
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
Slovakia PPEFor (2)Against (3) |
4
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (2) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Geoffroy DIDIER,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
Germany PPEFor (17)Against (10) |
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
Spain PPEAgainst (11) |
||
EFDD |
35
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (14) |
1
|
1
|
France EFDDFor (6) |
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (11) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Greece NIFor (5) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
37
|
1
|
2
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (2)Abstain (3) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (5) |
2
|
||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (11) |
1
|
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||||
ALDE |
58
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
3
|
7
|
|||||||||
S&D |
163
|
Poland S&D |
9
|
United Kingdom S&DAgainst (17) |
Bulgaria S&DFor (2)Against (2) |
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Sweden S&DAgainst (6) |
4
|
3
|
France S&DAgainst (12)Abstain (1) |
Germany S&DAgainst (25)
Arndt KOHN,
Arne LIETZ,
Bernd LANGE,
Birgit SIPPEL,
Constanze KREHL,
Dietmar KÖSTER,
Evelyne GEBHARDT,
Iris HOFFMANN,
Ismail ERTUG,
Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER,
Jens GEIER,
Joachim SCHUSTER,
Kerstin WESTPHAL,
Knut FLECKENSTEIN,
Maria NOICHL,
Martina WERNER,
Michael DETJEN,
Norbert NEUSER,
Peter SIMON,
Petra KAMMEREVERT,
Susanne MELIOR,
Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN,
Tiemo WÖLKEN,
Udo BULLMANN,
Ulrike RODUST
Abstain (1) |
Italy S&DAgainst (24)
Andrea COZZOLINO,
Brando BENIFEI,
Caterina CHINNICI,
Damiano ZOFFOLI,
Daniele VIOTTI,
David Maria SASSOLI,
Elena GENTILE,
Elly SCHLEIN,
Enrico GASBARRA,
Flavio ZANONATO,
Giuseppe FERRANDINO,
Isabella DE MONTE,
Luigi MORGANO,
Massimo PAOLUCCI,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Michela GIUFFRIDA,
Nicola CAPUTO,
Nicola DANTI,
Paolo DE CASTRO,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pier Antonio PANZERI,
Renata BRIANO,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
|
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 135 #
EL | ES | PT | SE | DE | DK | CY | ?? | MT | BE | EE | SK | LU | AT | CZ | GB | LV | IT | FI | HR | IE | SI | LT | NL | BG | HU | FR | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
16
|
45
|
17
|
19
|
83
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
6
|
20
|
5
|
12
|
6
|
18
|
17
|
55
|
6
|
53
|
11
|
9
|
7
|
7
|
8
|
21
|
14
|
14
|
68
|
26
|
42
|
|
S&D |
164
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
Sweden S&DFor (4)Abstain (2) |
Germany S&DFor (26)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Joachim SCHUSTER, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Michael DETJEN, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
Austria S&D |
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (17) |
1
|
Italy S&DFor (8)Against (16) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Romania S&DFor (1)Against (9) |
Poland S&D |
|||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
4
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
38
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
Spain GUE/NGLFor (6)Against (3) |
4
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (1) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
France GUE/NGL |
|||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (5)Against (9) |
Italy EFDDFor (11) |
France EFDDAgainst (2) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
16
|
Greece NIFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
30
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
Italy ENFAgainst (5) |
4
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
1
|
2
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||
ALDE |
58
|
Spain ALDEAgainst (5) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (2)Against (4) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
3
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
3
|
|||||||||
PPE |
173
|
2
|
Spain PPEAgainst (12)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
Sweden PPE |
Germany PPEAgainst (27)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Daniel CASPARY,
David McALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (5) |
3
|
5
|
Czechia PPEFor (2)Against (2)Abstain (2) |
2
|
4
|
Italy PPEFor (2)Against (6) |
2
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
Hungary PPEAgainst (9) |
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Geoffroy DIDIER,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
Romania PPEAgainst (11) |
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Julia PITERA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 137 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 152 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 153 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 159 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 60 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 161S #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 163S #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 140 #
ES | EL | DE | CY | DK | SE | LT | MT | AT | ?? | LU | EE | IE | FI | PT | HU | BE | SK | LV | IT | HR | SI | CZ | NL | BG | GB | FR | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
43
|
14
|
84
|
4
|
5
|
18
|
9
|
6
|
17
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
7
|
11
|
17
|
14
|
20
|
12
|
6
|
52
|
9
|
6
|
17
|
22
|
14
|
55
|
67
|
26
|
43
|
|
S&D |
161
|
3
|
Germany S&DFor (26)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Joachim SCHUSTER, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Michael DETJEN, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
1
|
2
|
Sweden S&DFor (2)Abstain (4) |
2
|
3
|
Austria S&D |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (1) |
3
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
Italy S&DFor (10)Against (13) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom S&DFor (17) |
Romania S&DAgainst (10) |
Poland S&D |
||||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
1
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
39
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (6) |
Germany GUE/NGL |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
France GUE/NGL |
||||||||||||||||||
NI |
14
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
35
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDD |
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
France EFDDFor (2)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
28
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Italy ENF |
4
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
1
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14) |
1
|
||||||||||||||
ALDE |
58
|
Spain ALDEFor (1)Against (5) |
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
3
|
1
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
3
|
|||||||||
PPE |
174
|
Spain PPEFor (1)Against (11) |
2
|
Germany PPEAgainst (28)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Daniel CASPARY,
David McALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
Hungary PPEAgainst (9) |
3
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (5) |
4
|
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
4
|
5
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
3
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
2
|
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Geoffroy DIDIER,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
Romania PPEAgainst (11) |
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Julia PITERA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 165S #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 166S #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 171S #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 142 #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 143S #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 144S #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Am 146S #
A8-0202/2018 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy - Proposition de la Commission #
DE | IT | ES | FR | RO | BE | NL | PT | SE | LT | HR | EL | SK | LU | EE | IE | FI | LV | DK | MT | SI | ?? | CY | BG | AT | HU | CZ | GB | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
83
|
51
|
44
|
68
|
26
|
20
|
22
|
17
|
18
|
9
|
9
|
13
|
12
|
6
|
6
|
7
|
11
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
6
|
2
|
4
|
13
|
17
|
13
|
17
|
55
|
43
|
|
S&D |
160
|
Germany S&DFor (26)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Joachim SCHUSTER, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Michael DETJEN, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
Italy S&DFor (23)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
|
10
|
4
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
Sweden S&D |
2
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (3)Abstain (1) |
Austria S&D |
3
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (17) |
Poland S&D |
||||
ALDE |
57
|
3
|
6
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
Netherlands ALDEAbstain (3) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
|||||||||
PPE |
173
|
Germany PPEFor (15)Against (13) |
Italy PPEFor (2) |
Spain PPEFor (11)Abstain (1) |
France PPEFor (18)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Tokia SAÏFI
|
Romania PPEFor (9)Against (2) |
3
|
3
|
Portugal PPEAbstain (1) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Slovakia PPEFor (4)Abstain (1) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
Slovenia PPEFor (2)Against (3) |
1
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
Austria PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
Hungary PPEFor (1)Against (7) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
2
|
Poland PPEFor (5)Against (13)Abstain (1) |
||
Verts/ALE |
43
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
1
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
5
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
38
|
Germany GUE/NGL |
2
|
Spain GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
France GUE/NGL |
2
|
Portugal GUE/NGLAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||
NI |
14
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
35
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (11) |
France EFDDFor (1)Against (5) |
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
28
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
2
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14) |
Amendments | Dossier |
624 |
2017/0114(COD)
2018/02/06
ENVI
185 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges can mobilise resources that contribute to the financing of the maintenance and development of high quality transport infrastructure. It is therefore appropriate to incentivise Member States to
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges can mobilise resources that contribute to the financing of the maintenance and development of high quality transport infrastructure.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges can mobilise resources that contribute to the financing of the maintenance and development of high quality transport infrastructure. It is therefore appropriate to incentivise Member States to use revenues from road charges accordingly and, to this end, to
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) In order to reduce climate effects and environmental pollution from transport sector in general, part of the revenues from road charging should be directed for the purpose of accelerating shift to rail, especially in transporting of goods.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) It is necessary to ensure that external-cost charges continue to reflect the cost of air pollution and noise generated by heavy duty vehicles as accurately as possible without rendering the charging scheme excessively complex, to incentivise the use of the most fuel-efficient vehicles, and to keep the incentives effective and the differentiation of road charges up-to-date. Therefore,
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) It is necessary to ensure that external-cost charges continue to reflect the cost of air pollution and noise generated by heavy duty vehicles and vans intended for the carriage of goods as accurately as possible without rendering the charging scheme excessively complex, to incentivise the use of the most fuel-efficient vehicles, and to keep the incentives effective and the
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) It is necessary to ensure that external-cost charges continue to reflect the cost of air pollution and noise generated by heavy duty vehicles as accurately as possible without rendering the charging scheme excessively complex, to incentivise the use of the most fuel-efficient vehicles and clean vehicles, and to keep the incentives effective and the differentiation of road charges up-to-date. Therefore, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of adapting the reference values for external cost charging to scientific progress, defining the modalities for the revenue-neutral variation of infrastructure charges according to the CO2 emissions from heavy duty vehicles, and adapting the modalities of the variation of infrastructure charges for light duty vehicles to technical progress. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201621. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 21 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1. OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 1 – point b b) tolls and user charges imposed on goods transport vehicles.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Existing concession contracts may be exempted from the requirements of the directive until the contract is renewed.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – point 2 – point a a) new infrastructure, new alternative transport infrastructure for modal shifting or new infrastructure improvements, including significant structural repairs;
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – Point 6 6. ‘toll’ means a specified amount based on the distance travelled on a given infrastructure and on the type of the vehicle, the payment of which confers the right for a vehicle to use the infrastructures, comprising an infrastructure charge, an external-cost charge and as the case may be a congestion charge
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – Point 7 7. ‘infrastructure charge’ means a charge levied for the purpose of recovering the construction, the maintenance, the operation and the development costs related to infrastructure incurred in a Member State and of cross-financing new, alternative transport infrastructure projects there;
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – Point 11 11. ‘cost of traffic-based air pollution’ means the cost of the
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – Point 12 12. ‘cost of traffic-based noise pollution’ means the cost of the
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – Point 19 19. ‘light duty vehicle’ means a passenger car, a minibus, a van, or a van intended for the carriage of goods;
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – Point 19 19) ‘light duty vehicle’ means a
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – Point 19 19) ‘light duty vehicle’ means a passenger car, a minibus or a van not intended for the carriage of people;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – Point 23 a (new) (23a) ‘zero-emission operation’ refers to hybrid vehicles when they operate with no exhaust emissions on the covered road network
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) costs of infrastructure or infrastructure improvements may include any specific expenditure on infrastructure designed to reduce nuisance related to noise or air pollution or to improve road safety and actual payments made by the infrastructure operator corresponding to objective environmental elements such as protection
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 9 (1a), Member States may maintain or introduce tolls and user charges on the trans- European road network or on certain sections of that network, and on any other additional sections of their network of
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 9(1a), Member States
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the right of Member States, in compliance with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to apply tolls and user charges on other roads
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 4 Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. By way of derogation from paragraph 5, Member States shall waive the obligation to pay tolls or user charges for zero-emission vehicles.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 6. Without prejudice to paragraph 9, from 1 January 2018, Member States shall not introduce user charges for heavy duty vehicles. User charges introduced before that date may be maintained until 31 December 202
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 (6) Without prejudice to paragraph 9, from 1 January 2018, Member States shall not introduce time-based user charges for heavy duty vehicles. User charges introduced before that date may be maintained until 31 December 202
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 6. Without prejudice to paragraph 9, from 1 January 2018, Member States shall not introduce user charges for heavy duty vehicles. User charges introduced before that date may be maintained until 31 December 202
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 (7) From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce time-based user charges for light duty vehicles.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce user charges for light duty vehicles. User charges introduced before that date shall be phased out by 31 December 202
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce user charges for light vehicles. User charges introduced before that date shall be phased out by 31 December 202
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 9 (9) As of 1 January 2020, tolls and user charges applied to heavy duty vehicles shall apply to all heavy duty vehicles, as well as to all vans intended for the carriage of goods.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – point 2 Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – point 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – point 3 Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – point 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – point 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – point 4 4. For
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States may maintain or introduce an external-cost charge, related to the cost of traffic-based air or noise pollution or both, for all categories of vehicles.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 1 – subparagraph 2 For heavy duty vehicles and vans intended for the carriage of goods, the external-cost charge shall vary and be set in accordance with the minimum requirements and the methods referred to in Annex IIIa and shall respect
Amendment 144 #
(2) The costs taken into account shall relate to the network or the part of the network on which external-cost charges are levied and to the vehicles that are subject thereto.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 3 Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 4 a (new) Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 4 b (new) 4b. From 1 January 2021, Member States shall introduce an external-cost charge, related to the cost of traffic-based environmental, air and noise pollution, to all heavy-duty and light-duty vehicles on all parts of the road network that are subject to a charge. In this connection, account shall be taken of existing rates applied in surrounding corridors for the same transport axis so that unwanted displacement and diversion of traffic between corridors is avoided.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 5 a (new) 5a. Member States and competent regions may introduce or maintain an external-cost charge, related to the cost of traffic-based environmental, air and noise pollution, on parts of the road network that are not covered by an infrastructure charge.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7da – point 2 a (new) 2a. In case of new collection infrastructure, the method of collection of congestion charges shall not contribute to creation or further development of the congestion
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7da – point 3 3. A congestion charge imposed on any section of the road network shall apply
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1 Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1 (1) After informing the Commission, a Member State or a competent region may add a mark-up to the infrastructure charge levied on specific road sections which are regularly congested, or the use of which by vehicles causes significant environmental damage, where the following conditions are met:
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1 – point a Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1 – point b Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1 – point b (b) the mark-up does not exceed 15 % of the weighted average infrastructure charge calculated in accordance with Article 7b(1) and Article 7e, except where the revenue generated is invested in cross- border sections of core network corridors, in which case the mark-up may not exceed
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1 – point c Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1 – point d d
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1 – point e Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1a Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 1a Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 2 Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 3 Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 4 Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 5 Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – point 5 Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 3 Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 4 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 177 #
Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100% above the same charge for equivalent vehicles having the lowest, but not zero, CO2 emissions. Zero-emission vehicles shall benefit from infrastructure charges reduced by 75% compared to the highest rate. Likewise, zero-emission operation shall benefit from the same reduction, provided that such operation can be proven.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 4 – subparagraph 2 Within
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 5 Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – point 4 – subparagraph 1 – footnote Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7ga– point 1 1. For light duty vehicles,
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7ga – point 2 2.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7ga – point 4 Amendment 185 #
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7h – point b Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 1999/62/EC Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7i – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) Users of passenger vehicles forced to use this infrastructure on a regular basis, in particular on account of living in a rural, enclosed or isolated area, shall benefit from such discounts or reductions up to a maximum of 50 %;
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point -a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point -a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point -a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b b) eliminating bottlenecks on the
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a (new) 3a. promoting the greater use of electric and (plug-in) hybrid vehicles
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Directive 1999/62/CE Articles 9d and 9e Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Directive 1999/62/EC Articles 9f and 9g Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 17 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 10a Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point b – point i – indent 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III – section 2 – point 2.1 – indent 6 — Costs shall be apportioned to heavy
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point b – point i – indent 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III – section 2 – point 2.2 – indent 2 — Such costs shall be apportioned between heavy
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point b – point ii Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III – section 4 – indent 1 - The calculation of tolls shall be based on actual or forecast shares of heavy
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – section 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annexe IIIa – section 1 – paragraph 2 – indent 1 Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – section 1 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC/EG Annex IIIa – section 2 – paragraph 1 Where a Member State intends to apply higher external-cost charges than the
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – section 3 – subparagraph 1 This section shall apply where a Member State intends to apply higher external cost charges than the
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 For each vehicle class, type of road and time period, the Member State or, where appropriate, an independent authority shall be encouraged to determine a single specific amount. The resulting charging structure shall be transparent, made public and available to all users on equal terms. The publication should occur in a timely manner before implementation. All parameters, data and other information necessary to understand how the various external-cost elements are calculated shall be made public.
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 When setting the charges, the Member
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 5 The Member State or, where appropriate, an independent authority, shall be encouraged to monitor the effectiveness of the charging scheme in reducing environmental damage arising from road transport. It shall be encouraged to adjust every two years
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph (–a) new Each Member State must be able to calculate the cost of traffic-based air pollution in accordance with procedures connected with its own taxation policy.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annexe IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph 1 Where a Member State intends to apply higher external-cost charges than the
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annexe IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annexe IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Annexe IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.2 – subparagraph (–a) new Each Member State must be able to calculate the cost of traffic-based noise pollution in accordance with procedures connected with its own taxation policy.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – section 4.2 – subparagraph 1 Where a Member State intends to apply higher external-cost charges than the
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIb – title Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annexe IIIb – paragraph 1 Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIb – paragraph 1 This Annex sets out
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Table 1:
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIb – table 2 Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIb – table 2 – title Table 2:
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIb – paragraph 2 The values of Tables 1 and 2 may be multiplied by a reference factor of
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex V (new) – paragraph 1 This Annex
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex V (new) – section 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall be called on to specify precisely:
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex VI (new) Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex VI (new) – title Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex VI (new) – paragraph 1 Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex VI – paragraph 2 Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex VI (new) – table Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex VII (new) – paragraph 3 The lower rates shall apply for any
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – paragraph 2 – point 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex V – section 1 – table 2 Vehicle category Coefficient of equivalence Light-duty vehicles 1 Rigid heavy goods vehicles 1.9
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – paragraph 2 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex VII – table Conformity
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) The movement of goods and passenger vehicles is a contributory factor in the release of pollutants into the atmosphere; these pollutants, which have a very serious impact on people’s health and lead to the deterioration of ambient air quality in Europe, include PM2.5, NO2, and O3, which in 2014 caused, respectively, 399 000, 75 000, and 13 600 premature deaths in the Union owing to prolonged exposure, according to European Environment Agency estimates produced in 2017.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) The ‘Handbook on External Costs of Transport’ of the Commission Directorate General for Transport and Mobility should be considered as a basis for fixing minima of amounts for the internalisation of external costs.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Congestion is becoming an increasingly serious problem, entailing high economic, social, and environmental costs, including delays, fuel waste, and additional CO2 and pollutant emissions.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 b (new) (1b) Electric transport systems, whether private or public, can help tackle the main mobility problems, including those occurring on out of town routes, by reducing CO2 emissions and completely eliminating pollutants and noise in a sustainable way. The degree of sustainability of electric vehicles also depends on the use of electricity generated from renewable sources.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 c (new) (1c) According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), noise from road traffic alone ranks second among the most harmful environmental stressors in Europe, exceeded only by air pollution; at least 9 000 premature deaths a year can be attributed to heart disease caused by traffic noise.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 d (new) (1d) According to the European Environment Agency’s 2017 report on air quality in Europe, road transport in 2015 was the sector with the highest NOx emissions and the second largest emitter of black carbon pollution.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All heavy duty vehicles have significant impact on road infrastructure and contribute to air pollution, while light duty vehicles are at the source of the majority of the negative environmental and social impacts from road transport related to emissions and congestion. In the interest of equal treatment and fair competition, it should be ensured that
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) In order to ensure the proportionality of charging, and to ensure that it applies only to the vehicles concerned, it is important to differentiate between light duty vehicles intended for the carriage of people and vans intended for the carriage of goods as regulated under Regulations (EC) No 1071/20091a and (EC) No 1072/20091b of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as under Regulation (EC) No 165/20141c of the European Parliament and of the Council. ____________________ 1a Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 51). 1b Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 72). 1c Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on tachographs in road transport, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport (OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 1).
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Time-based user charges do by nature not accurately reflect infrastructure costs actually induced and, for similar reasons, are not effective when it comes to incentivising cleaner and more efficient operations, or reducing congestion. They should therefore be gradually replaced by distance-based charges, which are fairer, more efficient and more effective. In the long term distance-based charges for all vehicles on all roads should replace taxes on vehicles and fuel.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Time-based user charges, moreover, encourage drivers to travel more when their vignette is valid, thus making them misapply the ‘polluter pays’ principle and the ‘user pays’ principle.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In order to secure user acceptance of future road charging schemes, Member States should be allowed to introduce adequate systems for the collection of charges as part of a wider package of mobility services. The Member States are encouraged to take into account the social acceptance of charging and socio- economic factors in their implementation, in particular to maintain the competitiveness of the transport sector, composed of many SMEs, and facilitate a relaxation of charges to users of private vehicles forced to use this infrastructure on a regular basis. Such systems should ensure a fair distribution of infrastructure costs and reflect the ‘polluter pays’ principle. Any Member States introducing such a system should ensure that it complies with the provisions of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council16.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In order to secure user acceptance of future road charging schemes, Member States should be allowed to introduce adequate systems for the collection of charges as part of a wider package of mobility services. Such systems should ensure a fair distribution of infrastructure costs and reflect the ‘polluter pays’ principle. Such toll systems, however, should also be monitored to ensure they do not cause that which they are designed to reduce - traffic jams and back-up. Any Member States introducing such a system should ensure that it complies with the provisions of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council16 . _________________ 16 Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 124–143
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Underlines the importance for the Member States of establishing a fair charging system which does not penalise users of private vehicles which, due to their place of residence in the countryside or in areas that are difficult of access or isolated, are forced to make more regular use of roads subject to charging; considers that, under territorial development policy, Member States should levy reduced charges on users from such areas;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) In order to secure user acceptance of future road charging schemes, Member States should be encouraged to take account of socio-economic factors when implementing road charging measures for passenger cars, particularly the vital role of road transport for residents of rural areas or areas that are isolated or poorly served by alternative modes of transport.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Pursuant to Directive 1999/62/EC, an external-cost charge may be imposed at a level close to the social marginal cost of the usage of the vehicle in question. That method has proven to be the fairest and most efficient way to take account of negative environmental and health impacts of air pollution and noise generated by heavy duty vehicles,
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Pursuant to Directive 1999/62/EC, an external-cost charge m
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Pursuant to Directive 1999/62/EC, an external-cost charge
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) It is essential that external-cost charging be made mandatory on the section of the road network subject to an infrastructure charge in order fully to internalise external costs, including those caused by noise and air pollution.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) To this effect, the maximum weighted average external-cost charges should be replaced by readily applicable reference values acceptable to the parties concerned and updated in light of inflation, the scientific progress made in estimating the external costs of road transport and the evolution of the fleet composition.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) To this effect, the maximum weighted average external-cost charges should be replaced by readily applicable
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The variation of infrastructure charges according to Euro emission class has contributed to the use of cleaner vehicles.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The variation of infrastructure charges according to Euro emission class has contributed to the use of cleaner vehicles. However, with the renewal of vehicle fleets, the variation of charges on this basis on the inter-urban network is expected to become obsolete by the end of 2020 and should therefore be phased out by that time. From the same point in time, external-cost charging
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) The share of CO2 emissions from heavy duty vehicles is increasing and, if no appropriate measures are taken, is expected to rise, according to estimates, by 10% by 2030 and by 17% by 2050. A variation of infrastructure charges according to such emissions is capable of contributing to improvements in this area and
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Calculating and estimating external costs caused by climate change should take into account the damage from extreme weather conditions for different sectors, including the transport sector, as well as investments in measures for the avoidance or reduction of the effects of climate change.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Light duty vehicles generate two thirds of the negative environmental and health impacts of road transport. It is therefore important to
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to promote the use of the cleanest and most efficient vehicles and reduce their competitive disadvantage in relation to conventional vehicles, Member States should as soon as possible apply significantly reduced road tolls and user charges to those vehicles.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to promote the use of
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) (12a) In order to promote vehicles whose direct emissions of CO2 are zero (electric, hydrogen, etc.), the Member States should be allowed to remove user charges and tolls for these vehicles.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1% of GDP. A significant part of this cost can
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1% of GDP. A significant part of this cost can be attributed to interurban congestion. A specific congestion charge should therefore be allowed, on condition that it is applied to all vehicle categories. In order to be effective and proportionate, the charge should be calculated on the basis of the marginal congestion cost and differentiated according to location, time and vehicle category. In order to maximise the positive effect of congestion charges, corresponding revenues should be allocated to projects
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1 % of GDP. A significant part of this cost can be attributed to interurban and cross- border congestion. A specific congestion charge should therefore be allowed, on condition that it is applied to all vehicle categories. In order to be effective and proportionate, the charge should be calculated on the basis of the marginal congestion cost and differentiated according to location, time and vehicle category. In order to maximise the positive effect of congestion charges, corresponding revenues should be allocated to projects addressing the sources of the problem, such as cross-border infrastructure or modal shift.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1% of GDP. A significant part of this cost can be attributed to interurban congestion. A specific congestion charge should therefore be allowed, on condition that it is applied to all vehicle categories. In order to be effective and proportionate, the charge should be calculated on the basis of the marginal congestion cost and differentiated according to location, time and vehicle category. In order to maximise the positive effect of congestion charges, corresponding revenues should be ring-fenced and allocated to projects addressing the sources of the problem.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1%- 2% of GDP. A significant part of this cost can be attributed to interurban congestion. A specific congestion charge should therefore be allowed, on condition that it is applied to all vehicle categories. In order to be effective and proportionate, the charge should be calculated on the basis of the marginal congestion cost and differentiated according to location, time and vehicle category. In order to maximise the positive effect of congestion charges, corresponding revenues should be allocated to projects addressing the sources of the problem.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Congestion charges should reflect the actual costs imposed by each vehicle on other road users directly, and indirectly on society at large, in a proportionate manner. In order to avoid that they disproportionately hinder the free movement of people and goods, particularly in cross-border and urban areas, they should be limited to specific amounts
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Mark-ups added to the infrastructure charge could also provide a useful contribution to addressing problems related to significant environmental damage or congestion caused by the use of certain roads, not only within mountainous areas. The current restriction of mark-ups to such areas should therefore be removed.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) The Alpine Convention’s Transport Protocol, as ratified by the EU and all Alpine Member States, should be a framework for applying the ‘polluter pays principle’ while setting higher amounts for the mark ups within the cross-border Alpine area.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) In case a Member State introduces a system of road charging, compensations granted may, according to the case, result in
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) Member States should be able to set up a compensation mechanism for both road tolls and user charges in order to limit the impact of such a measure, notably on very small, small and medium- sized enterprises.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19)
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges can mobilise resources that contribute to the financing of the maintenance and development of high
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges
source: 618.021
2018/02/23
TRAN
406 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Time-based user charges do by nature not accurately reflect infrastructure costs actually induced and
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Time-based user charges do by nature not accurately reflect infrastructure costs actually induced and, for similar reasons, are not effective when it comes to incentivising cleaner and more efficient operations, or reducing congestion. They should therefore be gradually replaced by distance-based charges, which are fairer, more efficient and more effective.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In order to ensure that this gradual replacement of time-based charges with distance-based charges does not become a further obstacle to access to the main European markets for transport from peripheral countries and regions, a compensation system should be put in place as soon as possible to balance the added costs and thereby ensure that it does not represent a significant loss of competitiveness.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In order to prevent traffic from switching to toll-free roads, which may have a serious impact on road safety and the optimum use of the road network, Member States must be able to levy tolls on all roads which are in direct competition with the trans-European networks.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) To ensure fair competition in the transport sector, vans that are intended for the carriage of goods and that are engaged in the occupation of road transport operator1a should be included in the scope of charges applied to heavy duty vehicles. _________________ 1a Regulation (EU).../... of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) 1071/2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator (2017/0123);
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Bearing in mind that peripheral countries could be disadvantaged by this calculation system based on distance, provisions should be introduced to ensure that this system is also fair for these countries.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) Clarification is necessary with regard to the possibility for the Member States to apply and maintain tolls and user charges for infrastructure that was completed more than 30 years ago but for which the construction costs have not yet been recovered.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In order to secure user acceptance of future road charging schemes, Member States should be allowed to introduce adequate systems for the collection of charges as part of a wider package of mobility services. Such systems should ensure a fair distribution of infrastructure
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In order to secure user acceptance of future road charging schemes, Member States should be allowed to introduce and maintain adequate systems for the collection of charges as part of a wider package of mobility services. Such systems should ensure a fair distribution of infrastructure costs and reflect the
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Nevertheless, in application of the ‘polluter pays’ principle, it should also be noted that the internalisation of costs via fixed-sum taxes in respect of a standard measure of fuel is an efficient means of collection, since it does not fluctuate with variations in prices, as well as being efficient in environmental terms, since de facto it establishes a bonus/malus system in which those who pollute most also pay most. Moreover, collection through taxes on fuels does not have the effect of diverting traffic onto less safe routes that are not subject to tolls. In this context, the Commission should analyse and study the impact of both existing and new tolls for heavy goods vehicles on the European single market and its differentiated territorial distribution.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The levying of charges on all road users by electronic means involves the mass collection and storage of personal data, which can also be used to draw up comprehensive movement profiles. The Member States and the Commission should systematically take account of the principles of purpose limitation and data minimisation when implementing this Directive. Technical solutions for the collection of data in connection with the levying of road-use charges should therefore incorporate anonymised, encrypted or advance payment options.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) If Member States levy infrastructure charges on private cars, they should take particular account of the historical, economic or topographical links between border areas. They should make provision for derogations and exemptions for their border areas in order not to impose disproportionate restrictions on individual transport for private and commercial purposes and allow cross- border journeys to be made unhindered.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The development of charging schemes and tariffs based on distance should take place at EU level, following the creation of a European Road Agency, which would function as an independent supervisory authority. Such an authority would ensure the transparency of the tariff values and charging schemes, and overlook that the revenues collected are used as intended in the present Directive.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) In order to facilitate, to some extent, the payment of tolls and charges by users, it is necessary to include explicit provisions on the payment of tolls and charges in the text of the Directive.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 b (new) (5b) The development of a valid and acceptable framework for inter-urban road charging must take the social component into account. A formula needs to be found that establishes a balance and does not discriminate against and impose a burden on the working classes, who are forced to live on the outskirts of cities as the most affordable option, given the excessive cost of housing in cities, creating further economic constraints on and obstacles to their mobility. As the White Paper on transport states, restricting mobility is not an option, and it is therefore necessary to establish financial support procedures and mechanisms at European and Member State level in order to ensure non- discriminatory access to city centres for the working classes.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) As in respect of heavy duty vehicles, it is important to ensure that any time-based charges applied to light duty vehicles are proportionate
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) As in respect of heavy duty vehicles, it is important to ensure that any time-based charges applied to light duty vehicles are proportionate, including in respect of periods of use shorter than one year. In that regard, account needs to be taken of the fact that light duty vehicles have a use pattern differing from the use pattern of heavy duty vehicles. The calculation of proportionate time-based charges could be based on available data on trip patterns while ensuring non- discrimination.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) As in respect of heavy duty vehicles, it is important to ensure that
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) As in respect of heavy duty vehicles, it is important to ensure that any time-based charges applied to light duty vehicles are proportionate, including in respect of periods of use shorter than one year. In that regard, account needs to be taken of the fact that light duty vehicles have a use pattern differing from the use pattern of heavy duty vehicles. The calculation of proportionate time-based charges could be based on available data on trip patterns.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Pursuant to Directive 1999/62/EC, an external-cost charge may be imposed at a level close to the social marginal cost of the usage of the vehicle in question. That method has proven to be the fairest and most efficient way to take account of negative environmental and health impacts of air pollution and noise generated by
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Pursuant to Directive 1999/62/EC, an external-cost charge consistent with the polluter-pays principle may be imposed at a level close to the social marginal cost of the usage of the vehicle in question. That method has proven to be the fairest and most efficient way to take account of negative environmental and health impacts of air pollution and noise generated by heavy duty vehicles, and would ensure a fair contribution from heavy duty vehicles to meeting EU air quality standards17 and any applicable noise limits or targets. The application of such charges should therefore be facilitated. _________________ 17 Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, OJ L 152, 11.06.2008, p. 1-44.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Pursuant to Directive 1999/62/EC, an external-cost charge m
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Pursuant to Directive 1999/62/EC,
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to ensure an appropriate re-use of revenues from external-cost charges, it would be appropriate for those revenues to be reinvested in the transport infrastructure sector in order to promote more sustainable modes of transport with a lower environmental impact.
Amendment 126 #
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) To this effect, the maximum weighted average external-cost charges should be replaced by readily applicable
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) To this effect, the maximum weighted average external-cost charges
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) To this effect, the maximum weighted average external-cost charges should be replaced by readily applicable
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The variation of infrastructure charges according to Euro emission class has contributed to the use of cleaner vehicles
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The variation of infrastructure charges according to Euro emission class has contributed to the use of cleaner vehicles.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The variation of infrastructure charges according to Euro emission class has contributed to the use of cleaner vehicles. However, with the renewal of vehicle fleets, the variation of charges on this basis on the inter-urban network is expected to become obsolete
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The variation of infrastructure charges according to Euro emission class has contributed to the use of cleaner vehicles. However, with the renewal of vehicle fleets, the variation of charges on this basis on the inter-urban network is expected to become obsolete by the end of 2020 and should therefore be phased out by that time. From the same point in time, external-cost charging
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) The variation of infrastructure charges according to Euro emission class has contributed to the use of cleaner vehicles.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Calculating and estimating external costs caused by climate change should take into account the damage from extreme weather conditions for different sectors, including the transport sector, as well as investments in measures for the avoidance or reduction of the effects of climate change.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Light duty vehicles generate two thirds of the negative environmental and health impacts of road transport. It is therefore important to incentivise the use of the cleanest and most fuel-efficient vehicles through the differentiation of road charges based on conformity factors defined in Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/42718, Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/64619, and Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/xxx20
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Light duty vehicles generate two thirds of the negative environmental and health impacts of road transport. It is therefore important to incentivise the use of the cleanest and most fuel-efficient vehicles through the differentiation of road charges
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11a) There should be at least fair competition with the more environmentally friendly rail transport, where presently track access charging for each locomotive on each kilometre and both for passengers and freight transport is mandatory according to Directive 2016/2370/EU1a. _________________ 1aDirective (EU) 2016/2370 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 amending Directive 2012/34/EU as regards the opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail and the governance of the railway infrastructure. OJ L 352, 23.12.2016, p. 1
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to promote the use of the cleanest and most efficient vehicles, Member States should apply significantly reduced road tolls and user charges to those vehicles. While automated and connected technology allows heavy-duty vehicles to further reduce CO2 emissions’ when platooning, those vehicles should also be entitled to additional reduction of road tolls and user charges.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to promote the use of the cleanest and most efficient vehicles and the use of alternative fuels, Member States should apply significantly reduced road tolls and user and external-cost charges to those vehicles. Zero-emission vehicles should not be subject to any external-cost charge related to air pollution.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to promote the use of the cleanest and most efficient vehicles, Member States should apply significantly reduced road tolls and user charges to those vehicles. While automated and connected technology allows heavy-duty vehicles to further reduce CO2 emissions’ when platooning, those vehicles should also be entitled to additional reduction of road tolls and user charges.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to promote the use of the cleanest and most efficient vehicles, Member States
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to promote the use of
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Trans-Alpine transit represents a particular problem for the regions affected, in the form of noise and air pollution and wear and tear on infrastructure, which is exacerbated by cost competition with nearby corridors. The regions affected and the Member States must therefore be afforded a broad measure of flexibility when it comes to the charging of external costs and the implementation of traffic-management measures, not least with a view to preventing unwanted displacement effects and the diversion of traffic between corridors.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1% of GDP. A significant part of this cost can be attributed to interurban congestion. A specific congestion charge should therefore be allowed, on condition that it is applied to all vehicle categories. In order to be effective
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1% of GDP. A significant part of this cost can be attributed to interurban congestion. A specific congestion charge should therefore be allowed, on condition that it is applied to all vehicle categories. In order to be effective and proportionate, the charge should be calculated on the basis of the marginal congestion cost and differentiated according to location, time and vehicle category.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1% of GDP. A significant part of this cost can be attributed to interurban congestion. A
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1 % of GDP. A significant part of this cost can be attributed to interurban congestion.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Bus and coach services offer the potential to solve wide-ranging environmental and social challenges and are part of the solution to congestion and transport externalities. In light of the positive role that energy efficient buses and coaches play as a collective mobility service, Member States should have the possibility to exempt them from external cost and congestion charging.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13a) To help safeguard the automobile heritage, Member States should place vehicles of historical interest in a special category for the purposes of adjusting the various charges payable under this Directive.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 Amendment 160 #
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Congestion charges should reflect
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 Amendment 164 #
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Mark-ups added to the
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Mark-ups added to the infrastructure charge could also provide a useful contribution to addressing problems related to significant environmental damage or congestion caused by the use of certain roads, not only within mountainous areas. The current restriction
Amendment 168 #
(16a) The Alpine Convention’s Transport Protocol, as ratified by the EU and all Alpine Member States, should be a framework for applying the ‘polluter pays principle’ while setting higher amounts for the mark ups within the cross-border Alpine area.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) In case a Member State introduces a system of road charging,
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) In case a Member State introduces a system of road charging, compensations granted may, according to the case, result
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) As in respect to light duty vehicles, it is important to ensure that the movement of citizens is not hampered by the provisions laid down in this Directive. Member States should be allowed to introduce discounts and reductions when road users are disproportionally affected by charges due to geographical or social reasons.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) In order to exploit potential synergies among existing road charging systems so as to reduce operating costs,
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) In order to exploit potential synergies among existing road charging systems so as to reduce operating costs, the Commission should be fully involved in the cooperation among Member States intending to introduce common and interoperable road charging schemes.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges can mobilise resources that contribute to the financing of the maintenance and development of high quality transport infrastructure. It is therefore appropriate
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges can mobilise resources that contribute to the financing of the maintenance and development of high quality transport infrastructure. It is therefore appropriate to incentivise Member States to use revenues from road charges accordingly and, to this end, to require that they adequately report on the use of such revenues. In the process, Member States should ensure that road charge revenues are used in their entirety for road infrastructure measures. That should in particular help identifying possible financing gaps, and raising the public acceptance of road charging.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges can mobilise resources that contribute to the financing of the maintenance and development of high quality intermodal transport infrastructure, public transport and non-motorised mobility. It is therefore appropriate to incentivise the EU and Member States to use revenues from road charges accordingly and, to this end, to require that they adequately report on the use of such revenues. That should in particular help identifying possible financing gaps, and raising the public acceptance of road charging.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges can mobilise resources that contribute to the financing of the maintenance and development of high quality transport infrastructure. It is therefore appropriate to incentivise Member States to use a part of the revenues from road charges accordingly and, to this end, to require that they adequately report on the use of such revenues. That should in particular help identifying possible financing gaps, and raising the public acceptance of road charging.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) Road charges
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) Member States that do not apply the user and polluter pays principle should not obtain EU co-funding for road infrastructure.
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Since the objective of this Directive is
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Since the objective of this Directive is in particular to ensure that national pricing schemes applied to utility vehicles other than heavy goods vehicles are applied within a coherent framework that secures
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 a (new) (20a) In view of the principle of subsidiarity and the economic and other differences between Member States and the disparities in means between individual sections of society, it should remain the responsibility of the Member States to introduce tolls and to introduce and maintain time- or distance-based user charges for passenger cars, vans, minibuses, coaches and buses.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) It is necessary to ensure that external-cost charges continue to reflect the cost of air pollution and noise generated by heavy duty vehicles as accurately as possible without rendering the charging scheme excessively complex, to incentivise the use of the most fuel-efficient vehicles, and to keep the incentives effective and the differentiation of road charges up-to-date.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) It is necessary to ensure that external-cost charges continue to reflect the cost of air pollution and noise generated by heavy duty vehicles as accurately as possible without rendering the charging scheme excessively complex, to incentivise the use of the most fuel-efficient and clean vehicles, and to keep the incentives effective and the differentiation of road charges up-to-date. Therefore, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of adapting the reference values for external cost charging to scientific progress, defining the modalities for the revenue-neutral variation of infrastructure charges according to the CO2 emissions from heavy duty vehicles, and adapting the modalities of the variation of infrastructure charges for light duty vehicles to technical progress. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201621 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) It is necessary to ensure that external-cost charges continue to reflect the cost of air pollution and noise generated by heavy duty vehicles as accurately as possible without rendering the charging scheme excessively complex, to incentivise the use of the most fuel-efficient vehicles, and to keep the incentives effective and the differentiation of road charges up-to-date. Therefore, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of adapting the
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) It is necessary to ensure that external-cost charges continue to reflect the cost of air pollution and noise generated by heavy duty vehicles as accurately as possible without rendering the charging scheme excessively complex, to incentivise the use of the most fuel-efficient vehicles, and to keep the incentives effective and the differentiation of road charges up-to-date. Therefore, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of adapting the
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new) (21a) No later than two years after the entry into force of the Directive as amended, the Commission will put forward a generally applicable, transparent and clear framework for the internalisation of environmental, congestion and health costs that will form the basis for future calculations of infrastructure charges. In this connection, the Commission may propose a model accompanied by an analysis of the impact on external-cost internalisation for all transport modes. As regards proportionality, account must be taken of all modes in connection with external-cost charging.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new) (21a) In the interest of transparency, it would be appropriate for Member States to disclose to road users the results achieved by the reinvestment of infrastructure charges, external-cost charges and congestion charges. They should therefore announce the benefits obtained in terms of improved road safety, reduced environmental impact and reduced traffic congestion.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 a (new) (22a) To ensure that the existing contractual frameworks governing concession contracts are legally stable with regard to the recovery of road fees, this Directive should apply only to new concession contracts and/or once the planned renegotiation processes have been concluded, and should have no retroactive effects.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Title Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Title Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of motorised vehicles for pollution and the use of road infrastructures;
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Title Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Title Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of road infrastructures;
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Title Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of road infrastructures;
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Title Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of vehicles for the use of certain road infrastructures;
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Title Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) 1a. This Directive shall not apply to vehicles for the duration of their use in border areas.
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point (a) (a) vehicle taxes for heavy goods vehicles, motor caravans, crane lorries and other machinery often using public roads,
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point (a) (a) vehicle taxes for heavy goods vehicles, trucks and buses,
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b b) tolls and user charges imposed on goods vehicles.
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) tolls and user charges imposed on vehicles as defined in article 2(15).
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) ‘construction costs’ means the costs related to construction, including
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a (a) new, alternative transport infrastructure for modal shifting, new infrastructure or new infrastructure improvements, including significant structural repairs;
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) ‘financing costs’ means interest on borrowings at the time of construction and return on any equity
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) it provides parking areas;
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 (6) ‘toll’ means a specified amount based on the distance travelled on a given infrastructure and on the type of the vehicle, the payment of which confers the right for a vehicle to use the infrastructures, comprising an infrastructure charge
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6. ‘toll’ means a specified amount based on the distance travelled on a given infrastructure and on the type of the vehicle, the payment of which confers the right for a vehicle to use the infrastructures, comprising an infrastructure charge
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 (6) ‘toll’ means a specified amount based on the distance travelled on a given infrastructure and on the type of the vehicle,
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 (6) ‘toll’ means a specified amount based on the distance travelled on a given infrastructure and on the type of the vehicle, the payment of which confers the right for a vehicle to use the infrastructures, including safe parking areas, comprising an infrastructure charge, and as the case may be a congestion charge or an external-cost charge or both;
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6. ‘toll’ means a specified amount based on the distance travelled on a given infrastructure and on the type of the vehicle, the payment of which confers the right for a vehicle to use the infrastructures, comprising an infrastructure
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6. ‘toll’ means a specified amount based on the distance travelled on a given infrastructure and on the type of the vehicle, the payment of which confers the right for a vehicle to use the infrastructures, comprising an infrastructure charge, an external-cost charge and as the case may be a congestion charge
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 7. ‘infrastructure charge’ means a charge levied for the purpose of recovering the construction, the maintenance, the operation and the development costs related to infrastructure incurred in a Member State and of cross-financing new, alternative transport infrastructure projects there;
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 11. ‘cost of traffic-based air pollution’ means the cost of the
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 12. ‘cost of traffic-based noise pollution’ means the cost of the
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 (15) ‘vehicle’ means a motor vehicle
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 15. ‘vehicle’ means a motor vehicle, with no fewer than four wheels
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 (15) ‘motorised road vehicle’ means a motor vehicle, with
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 (15) ‘vehicle’ means a motor vehicle, with four wheels or more, or articulated vehicle combination intended or used for the carriage by road of
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 (17)
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 19. ‘light duty vehicle’ means
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 (19) ‘light duty vehicle’ means
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/CE Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new) (20a) 'vehicle of historical interest' a vehicle that is considered to be of historical interest under the terms of Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22 Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22 (22) ‘van’ means a vehicle
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (22a) ‘life cycle’ of a vehicle means its impact caused by its production, existence and use as well as recycling and waste management at its end;
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23a) ‘zero-emission operation’ means hybrid vehicles when they operate with no exhaust emissions on the covered road network;
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23a) ‘low emission vehicle’ means a vehicle that causes during its entire life cycle less than 10 % emissions than the average of the total EU fleet.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23a) ‘zero-emission operation’ means an operation by vehicle that is capable to operate with no exhaust emissions on the covered road network;
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23a) ‘zero-emission operation’ refers to hybrid vehicles when they operate with no exhaust emissions on the covered road network;
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23a) ‘zero-emission operation’ refers to hybrid vehicles when they operate with no exhaust emissions on the covered road network;
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24 (24) ‘transport operator’ means any undertaking transporting goods
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 25 (25) ‘vehicle of the ‘EURO 0’, ‘EURO I’, ‘EURO II’, ‘EURO III’, ‘EURO IV’, ‘EURO V’, ‘EURO VI’ category’ means a heavy
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 27 (27) ‘concession contract’ means a ‘
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 27 27) ‘concession contract’ means a
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 29 (29) ‘substantially amended tolling or charging arrangement’ means a tolling or charging arrangement, which has been amended in such a way that costs or revenues are affected by at least 5% in comparison with the previous year, after correcting for inflation measured by changes in the EU-wide Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices, and excluding energy and unprocessed food, as published by the Commission (Eurostat). In the case of toll systems based on concession contracts, the rules relating to the ‘Modification of contracts during their term’, referred to in Article 43 of Directive 2014/23/EU on the award of concession contracts, shall apply. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout).
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC 29) ‘substantially amended tolling or charging arrangement’ means a tolling or charging arrangement, which has been amended in such a way that costs or revenues are affected by at least 5% in comparison with the previous year, after correcting for inflation measured by changes in the EU-wide Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices, and excluding energy and unprocessed food, as published by the Commission (Eurostat). In concession contracts, modifications that fulfil the criteria of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 43 of Directive 2014/23/EU shall not be considered substantial.
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 29 (29) ‘substantially amended tolling or charging arrangement’ means a tolling or charging arrangement, which has been amended in such a way that costs or revenues are affected by at least 5% in comparison with the previous year, after correcting for inflation measured by changes in the EU-wide Harmonised Index
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1.º – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 29 29) ‘substantially amended tolling or charging arrangement’ means a tolling or charging arrangement, which has been amended in such a way that costs or revenues are affected by at least
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (29) ‘substantially amended tolling or charging arrangement’ means a tolling or charging arrangement, which has been amended in such a way that costs or revenues are affected by at least 25% in comparison with the previous year, after correcting for inflation measured by changes in the EU-wide Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices, and excluding energy and unprocessed food, as published by the Commission (Eurostat).
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 29 a (new) (29a) ‘border areas’ means areas, about 30 km wide, along the internal borders of the EU;
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 29 a (new) (29a) ‘cross-financing’ means the financing of efficient, alternative transport infrastructure projects from revenues from tolls and infrastructure charges on existing transport infrastructure;
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) costs of infrastructure or infrastructure improvements may include any
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b b) costs of infrastructure or infrastructure improvements may include any specific expenditure on infrastructure designed to reduce nuisance related to noise or to improve road safety, the introduction of innovative technologies for these operations and actual payments made by the infrastructure operator corresponding to objective environmental elements such as protection against soil contamination.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 1a (new) (2a) The following Article 1a is inserted: Article 1a. Only Member States that apply this Directive, including the principles on the internalisation of external costs, can benefit from EU co-funding for road infrastructure. They shall reimburse to the EU budget the share of revenues from charging of total EU co-funding for their roads during the concerned year.
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1.º – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) The existing concession contracts shall be exempt from the obligations laid down in Articles 7, 7c, 7da, 7g and 7ga until they expire or are renewed;
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (2b) In Article 6(2), new point (ba) is added: (ba) vehicles of historical interest pursuant to Article 3(7) of Directive 2014/45/EU on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3 1. Without prejudice to Article 9 (1a), Member States may maintain or introduce tolls and user charges on the trans- European road network or on certain sections of that network, and on any other additional sections of their network of motorways which are not part of the trans- European road network under the conditions laid down in paragraphs 3 to 9 of this Article and in Articles 7a to 7k. Regional authorities with responsibility for Mobility Organisation may introduce tolls and charges on the road network for which they are responsible, subject to the agreement of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 9 (1a), Member States may maintain or introduce tolls and user charges on the trans-
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States may apply user charges or tolls for infrastructure that was completed more than 30 years before 10 June 2008, but for which the construction costs could not be recovered.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 2 Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall not impose both tolls and user charges on any given category of vehicle for the use of a single road section.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 4 Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. Tolls and user charges shall not discriminate, directly or indirectly, on the grounds of the nationality of the road user, the Member State or the third country of establishment of the transport operator or of registration of the vehicle, or the origin or destination of the transport operation. In order to avoid any additional burden and added costs for transport from peripheral countries, a compensation system shall be put in place to prevent any loss of competitiveness, which could be based, inter alia, on access to a more effective fleet and/or the provision of exclusive or technological infrastructure such as e- highways.
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 5 5. Member States may provide for reduced toll rates or user charges, or exemptions from the obligation to pay tolls or user charges for heavy duty vehicles exempted from the requirement to install and use recording equipment under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council*,
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 6. Without prejudice to paragraph 9, from
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 6. Without prejudice to paragraph 9, from 1 January 2018, Member States shall not introduce user charges for heavy duty vehicles.
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 6. Without prejudice to paragraph 9, from 1 January 2018, Member States shall not introduce time-based user charges for heavy duty vehicles.
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 6. Without prejudice to paragraph 9, from 1 January 2018, Member States shall not introduce user charges for heavy duty vehicles. User charges introduced before that date may be maintained until 31 December 202
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – point 7 Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce user charges for light duty vehicles.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce user charges for light duty vehicles. User charges introduced before that date shall be phased out by 31 December 2027, or following the expiration of a contract with a toll system operator that ends after this date.
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce user charges for light duty vehicles.
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce time-based user charges for light duty vehicles.
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce user charges for light duty vehicles. User charges introduced before that date shall be phased out by 31 December 202
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce user charges for light duty vehicles. User charges introduced before that date shall be phased out by 31 December 202
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. From [the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States shall not introduce user charges for light duty vehicles. User charges introduced before that date shall be phased out by 31 December 202
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 9 Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 9 (9)
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 paragraph 9 9. As of 1 January 2020, tolls and user charges applied to heavy duty vehicles shall apply to all heavy duty vehicles and vans intended for the carriage of goods.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 9. As of 1 January 2020, tolls and user charges applied to heavy duty vehicles
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 10 Tolls and user charges for heavy duty vehicles on the one hand and for light duty vehicles on the other may be introduced or maintained independently from one another. In addition, user charges may be maintained or introduced on the trans- European road network or on secondary roads independently of each other.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Tolls and user charges for heavy duty vehicles and vans intended for the carriage of goods, on the one hand and for light duty vehicles on the other may be introduced or maintained independently from one another.
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 10 Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 10 Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. From 1 January 2023, an infrastructure charge imposed on any section of the road network referred to in Article 7(1) shall apply in a non- discriminatory manner to all motorised vehicles.
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Member States shall set user charges, including administrative costs, for
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Insofar as user charges are applied in respect of passenger cars, the use of the infrastructure shall be made available at least for the following periods: a day, a week, 10 days, a month or two months or both, and a year. The two-monthly rate shall be no more than 30 % of the annual rate, the monthly rate shall be no more than 18 % of the annual rate, and the 10-day rate shall be no more than 8 % of the annual rate.
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Insofar as user charges are applied in respect of passenger cars, the use of the infrastructure shall be made available at least for the following periods: a day, 10 days, a month or two months or both, and a year. The two-monthly rate shall be no more than 30 % of the annual rate, the monthly rate shall be no more than 18 % of the annual rate, and the 10-day rate shall be no more than 8 % of the annual rate.
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – paragraph 4 4. For minibuses and vans, Member States shall comply either with paragraph 2 or with paragraph 3.
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – paragraph 4 4. For minibuses, vans and vans intended for the carriage of goods, Member States shall comply either with paragraph 2 or with paragraph 3. Member States shall however set higher user charges for minibuses, vans and vans intended for the carriage of goods than for passenger cars as from 1 January 2024 at the latest.
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7a – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The proportionality of road use shall take into consideration the singularity of transport operations which start in a country on the periphery of the EU. A formula should be found for levying user charges, be it a deduction in externality rates and/or congestion rates or other possibilities, so that there is no discrimination with the dramatic increase of prices against the transport operations in these countries.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 a – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. To the extent that intercity toll charges are applied, financial support mechanisms and procedures (bono social) must be set up at EU and Member State levels to ensure that European citizens who have been displaced to the outskirts of cities are not discriminated against.
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 b – paragraph 3 (new) (4 a) In Article 7b, the following paragraph 3 is added: 3. The motorway sections on which an infrastructure charge is applied shall have the necessary infrastructure and parking areas in compliance with Regulation (EU) .../.... of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards on minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods (2017/0122(COD)).
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States may maintain or introduce an external-cost charge, related to the cost of traffic-based air or noise pollution or both, including on sections of the networks which are not subject to infrastructure charges.
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States may maintain or introduce an external-cost charge, related to the cost of
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States m
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 For heavy duty vehicles, the external-cost charge shall vary and be set in accordance with the minimum requirements and the methods referred to in Annex IIIa and shall respect the reference values set out in Annex IIIb. Zero-emissions vehicles shall not be subject to any external-cost charge related to air pollution.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 For heavy duty vehicles, the external-cost charge for congestion, traffic-based air or noise pollution shall vary and be set in accordance with the minimum requirements and the methods referred to in Annex IIIa and shall respect the reference values set out in Annex IIIb.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 For heavy duty vehicles, the external-cost charge shall vary and be set in accordance with the minimum requirements and the methods referred to in Annex IIIa and shall respect the
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC For heavy duty vehicles, the external-cost charge shall vary and be set in accordance with the minimum requirements and the methods referred to in Annex IIIa and shall respect the
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Member States can apply derogations which allow external-cost charges to be adjusted for historic vehicles.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 2 (2) The costs taken into account shall relate to the network or the part of the network on which external-cost charges are levied and to the vehicles that are subject thereto.
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7c – point 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The external-cost charge related to traffic- based air pollution shall not apply to heavy duty vehicles which comply with the most stringent of EURO emission standards. A policy to encourage cleaner and more environmentally friendly vehicles, engines and fuels is needed to help transport companies to reach the targets.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The external-cost charge related to traffic- based air pollution shall not apply to heavy
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 3 Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC 3a. Before 31 December 2030, no external-cost charges shall be levied in relation to air pollution on vehicles which use alternative fuels, according to the definition in Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure.
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 5 5. From 1 January 2021, Member States that levy tolls shall apply an external-cost charge to heavy duty vehicles on at least the part of the network referred to in Article 7(1) where environmental damage generated by heavy duty vehicles is higher than the average environmental damage generated by heavy duty vehicles defined in accordance with relevant reporting requirements referred to in Annex IIIa."; In the case of infrastructure under concession, Member States may, in the alternative, take environmental mitigation actions as part of the concession, and in compliance with the provisions of the contracts in force. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 5 5. From 1 January 2021, Member States that levy tolls shall apply an external-cost charge to heavy duty vehicles and vans intended for the carriage of goods on at least the part of the network referred to in Article 7(1) where environmental damage generated by heavy duty vehicles is higher than the average environmental damage generated by heavy duty vehicles defined in accordance with relevant reporting requirements referred to in Annex IIIa.;
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/CE Article 7 c– paragraph 5 5. From 1 January 2021, Member States that levy tolls
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 5 (5) From 1 January 2021, Member States that levy tolls shall apply an external-cost charge to heavy duty vehicles on
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 5 5. From 1 January 2021, Member States that levy tolls
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. When it is not technically possible or is disproportionately burdensome to introduce external costs in relation to air pollution caused by traffic or noise pollution caused by traffic, or both, the Member States may choose not to do so, or choose to do so on the exclusive condition that vehicles use an electronic tolling system as their method of payment. In such an event, for vehicles that do not use electronic tolling as their method of payment, Member States may apply tolls up to the highest level chargeable. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 5 a (new) (5a) Until 31 December 2023, a Member State may derogate from the requirement of implementing the external-cost charge, in any of the following circumstances: (i) it would seriously undermine the coherence of the toll systems in its territory; (ii) it would not be technically practicable to introduce such differentiation in the toll system concerned;
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 d a Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 d a – paragraph 1 Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 d a – paragraph 1 1. Member States may, in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex V, introduce a congestion charge on any section of their road network which is subject to congestion, regardless of whether it is subject to an infrastructure charge. The congestion charge may only be applied on those road sections which are regularly congested and only during the periods when they are typically congested.
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 d a – paragraph 2 Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 d a – paragraph 3 Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 da – paragraph 3 3. A congestion charge imposed on any section of the road network shall apply in a non-discriminatory manner to all vehicle categories, in accordance with the standard equivalence factors set out in Annex V. Member States may however decide to exempt buses and coaches for the promotion of collective transport and socio-economic development and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 d a – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Member States may apply derogations which allow congestion charges to be adjusted for historic vehicles.
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7da – paragraph 4 Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 d a – paragraph 4 4. The congestion charge shall reflect the costs imposed by a vehicle on other road users, and indirectly on society,
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 d a – paragraph 5 Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7da – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall put in place adequate mechanisms for monitoring the impact of congestion charges and for reviewing the level thereof. They shall review the level of charges
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 d a a (new) 6a. the following Article 7daa is inserted: Article 7daa Member States may not levy any more congestion charges from 31 December 2021 onwards.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 1 (1) After informing the Commission, a Member State may add a mark-up to the infrastructure charge levied on specific road sections
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the revenue generated from the mark-up is invested in financing the construction of transport infrastructure
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the revenue generated from the mark-up is invested in financing the
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the revenue generated from the mark-up is invested in financing the construction of transport infrastructure of the core network identified in accordance with Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, which contribute directly to the alleviation of
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the mark-up does not exceed 15 % of the weighted average infrastructure charge calculated in accordance with Article 7b(1) and Article 7e, except where the revenue generated is invested in cross- border sections of core network corridors, in which case the mark-up may not exceed
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 a Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 1 a Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 3 Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 4 4. The amount of the mark-up shall be deducted from the amount of the external- cost charge calculated in accordance with Article 7c, except for vehicles of EURO emission classes 0, I and II from 15 October 2011, III and IV from 1 January 2015, V from 1 January 2019, and VI from January 2023 onwards.
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 4 4. The amount of the mark-up shall be deducted from the amount of the external- cost charge calculated in accordance with Article 7c, except for vehicles of EURO emission classes 0, I and II from 15 October 2011, III and IV from 1 January 2015, V from 1 January 2019, and VI from January 2023 onwards. All revenues generated by the simultaneous application of the mark-up and the external cost charges shall be used to eliminate bottlenecks and invested in financing the construction of core network corridors listed in Part I of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (new) Directive 1999//62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 5 a (new) 4 a. 5a. A considerably higher mark up shall be allowed in (cross-border) mountainous areas, such as the Alps, as described in the Transport Protocol of the Alpine Convention, because as infrastructure costs as well as climate and environmental damage are already higher there; These higher mark ups shall be fixed by the Member States and Regions concerned and correspond to the higher costs as mentioned;
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 5 Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. A Member State may derogate from the set of variations stipulated in paragraphs 1 to 5 for the current concessions contracts should the coherence and consistency of the toll systems in its territory be seriously compromised.
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 1 – introductory part Until 31 December 2021, or on expiry of an agreement with a toll system operator that ends after this date, the infrastructure charge may be varied for the purpose of reducing congestion, minimising infrastructure damage and optimising the use of the infrastructure concerned or promoting road safety, where the following conditions are met:
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 1 – introductory part Until 31 December 2021, the infrastructure charge may be varied for the purpose of
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 1 – point c (c) no infrastructure charge is more than 1
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the peak periods during which the higher infrastructure charges are levied for the purpose of reducing congestion do not exceed five hours per day or the number of hours during which the ratio of congestion exceeds 100% of capacity;
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) the variation does not lead to deviations to alternative secondary road connections.
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 3 3. Where, in the event of a check, a driver or, if appropriate, the transport operator,
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 3 3. Where
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Within one year after official CO2 emission data are published by the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) …/…*****, the Commission shall adopt a delegated act, in accordance with Article 9e, to define the reference values of CO2 emissions, together with an appropriate categorisation of the heavy duty vehicles concerned and to take into account advanced technologies and to define the modalities allowing tyre label classes to be factored in when modulating road charging, according to Regulation (EC) No 1222/2009.
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Within one year after
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Within one year after official CO2 emission data are published by the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) …/…*****, the Commission shall adopt a delegated act, in accordance with Article 9e, to define the reference values of CO2 emissions, together with an appropriate categorisation of the heavy duty vehicles concerned, and to factor in emission reducing technologies.
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Within
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100% above the same charge for equivalent vehicles having the lowest, but not zero, CO2 emissions. Zero-emission vehicles shall benefit from infrastructure charges reduced by 75% compared to the highest rate. Likewise, zero-emission operation shall benefit from the same reduction, provided that such operation can be proven.
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100% above the same charge for equivalent vehicles having the lowest, but not zero, CO2 emissions. Zero-emission vehicles shall benefit from infrastructure charges reduced by 75% compared to the highest rate. Likewise, zero-emission operation shall benefit from the same reduction, provided that such operation can be proven.
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100% above the same charge for equivalent
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation.
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100% above the same charge for equivalent vehicles having the lowest, but not zero, CO2 emissions. Zero-emission vehicles and zero-emission operations shall benefit from infrastructure charges reduced by 75% compared to the highest rate.
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100% above the same charge for equivalent vehicles having the lowest, but not zero, CO2 emissions. Zero-emission vehicles and zero-emission operations shall benefit from infrastructure charges reduced by 75% compared to the highest rate. (This amendment should apply to Annex VII as well.)
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100% above the same charge for equivalent vehicles having the lowest, but not zero, CO2 emissions. Zero-emission vehicles and zero-emission operations shall benefit from infrastructure charges reduced by 75% compared to the highest rate.
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100% above the same charge for equivalent
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation.
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7g – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Commission shall publish an evaluation report assessing the market share of zero-emission vehicles and zero- emission operations (OJ: insert date: five years after the entry into force of this Directive).
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7ga Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 1 Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 1 Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/CE Article 7 g a – paragraph 1 1. For light duty vehicles, until 31 December 2021, Member States may vary tolls and user charges according to the environmental performance of the vehicle. In order to maintain legal certainty and to maintain existing agreements for construction and/or maintenance of motorways, they should be exempt from the regulations until the end of their validity.
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 1 (1) For light duty vehicles, until 31 December 2021, Member States may vary tolls and user charges according to the environmental performance of the vehicle. They must also take the principle of proportionality into account with regard to other vehicles in the process.
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 1 1. For light duty vehicles and vans intended for the carriage of goods, until 31 December 2021, Member States may vary tolls and user charges according to the environmental performance of the vehicle.
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 1 1. For light duty vehicles,
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 2 Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/CE Article 7 g a – paragraph 2 2. From 1 January 2022 Member States shall vary tolls and, in the case of user charges, at least annual charges, according to the CO2 and pollutant emissions of vehicles in accordance with
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 2 2. From 1 January 2022 Member States shall vary tolls and, in the case of user charges, at least annual charges, according to the CO2 and pollutant emissions of vehicles in accordance with the rules set out in Annex VII. In order to achieve the targets, the Member States shall subsidise and provide incentives for investment in cleaner technologies.
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 2 2. From 1 January 2022, or on expiry of an agreement with a toll system operator that ends after this date, Member States shall vary tolls and, in the case of user charges, at least annual charges,
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 2 (2) From 1 January 2022 Member States shall vary tolls and, in the case of user charges, at least annual charges, according to the CO2 and pollutant emissions of vehicles in accordance with the rules set out in Annex VII, subject to the provisions of Article 7c(5a) of this Directive.
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 2 2. From 1 January 2022 Member States
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In the variation in toll charges, the Member States can take into account the improvement of the environmental performance of the vehicle which is linked to its conversion to alternative fuels. To that end, standing arrangements or any other mechanism approved by the toll system’s operator should allow users to benefit from a variation in toll charges to consider the environmental performance of the vehicle after conversion.
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 3 Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 3 3. Where, in the event of a check, a driver or, if appropriate, the transport operator, is unable to produce the vehicle documents necessary to ascertain the emission levels of the vehicle (Certificate
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 3 3. Where, in the event of a check, a driver or, if appropriate, the transport operator, is not involved in an arrangement or any other mechanism approved by the operator or is unable to produce the vehicle documents necessary to ascertain the emission levels of the vehicle (Certificate of Conformity) pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) …/…******, Member States may apply tolls or annual user charges up to the highest level chargeable.
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 (new) Directive 1999/62/EG Article 7 g a – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Member States may adopt exceptional measures for the purposes of charging historic vehicles conform Article 3(7) of Directive 2014/45/EU1a. _________________ 1aDirective 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC Text with EEA relevance (OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 51)
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 4 Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g a – paragraph 4 The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9e amending Annex VII in order to adapt the modalities specified in the Annex to technical progress
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/62/EG Article 7 g a – paragraph 4 Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a a (new) Directive 1999/62/EG Article 7 h – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 3 (new) (a a) in Article 7h, paragraph (1), point (a) the following paragraph is added "- clear information on the interoperability of the on-board equipment that is carried on board of vehicles to pay user charges and tolls. It shall state the reasons why other on-board equipment in use in other EU-Member States cannot applied by users for this tolling arrangement".
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a b (new) Directive 1999//62/EC Article 7 h – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3 (new) Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a c (new) (a c) in Article 7h, the following paragraph is added: "a) Both tolling arrangements, tolling arrangements involving concession tolls and tolling arrangements other than those involving concession tolls, shall charge the external cost for air pollution, for noise and accident costs and the mark-up as laid down in Art 7c and 7f, The revenue generated shall be transferred to the competent public authorities in the Member States and invested according to the provisions of this directive b) Regarding the variation of CO2 and congestion-related charging as laid down in Art 7g, and 7ga , the Commission will submit guidelines by 2021 at the latest that can be implemented in an uniform way by both tolling arrangements, tolling arrangements involving concession tolls and tolling arrangements other than those involving concession tolls."
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point -a a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 i – paragraph 2 – introductory part Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 i – paragraph 2 – point c (c) such discounts or reductions do not exceed 13 % of the infrastructure charge paid by equivalent vehicles not eligible for the discount or reduction.
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a Directive 1999/CE/62 Article 7 i – paragraph 2 – point c (c) such discounts or reductions do not exceed
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7i – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) for passenger cars that have to be used in order to travel to a place of employment, in particular on the areas of dispersed settlements in circumstances where there is no alternative public transport, discounts or reductions may exceptionally be increased to 50%;
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 i – paragraph 2 a (new) (a a) In Article 7 i, the following paragraph 2 a is inserted: 2a. For light duty vehicles, Member States may provide for discounts or reductions to the infrastructure charge on the condition that: (a) the resulting charging structure is proportionate, made public and available to users on equal terms and does not lead to additional costs being passed on to other users in the form of higher tolls; (b) such discounts and reductions contribute to social cohesion; and (c) such discounts and reductions contribute to ensure the mobility of peripheral regions and/or remote areas;
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a a (new) Directive 1999//62/EC Article 7 i – paragraph 1 a (new) (a a) In paragraph 7 i the following paragraph 1a is inserted: 1a. Member States should take into account the introduction to all vehicle types of a kilometre-based rate exemption on specific road sections, taking into account the mobility patterns and economic interest of peripheral regions.
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 i – paragraph 3 3. Subject to the conditions provided for in Article 7g(1)(b) and (5), toll rates may for specific projects of high European interest identified in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, be subject to other forms of variation in order to secure the commercial viability of such projects where they are exposed to direct competition with other modes of transport. The resulting charging structure shall be
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b a (new) Directive 1999//62/EC Article 7 i – paragraph 3 a (new) (b a) In article 7i, the following paragraph 3a is included : 3a. In mountain areas, Member States or competent authorities may vary toll rates according to distance travelled by the tolled vehicles to minimise social- economic impacts, provided that: (a) The variation according to driving distance considers the different characteristics of short-distance and long- distance transport, especially the available options for modal shift to other transport modes. (b) The variation is applied in a non- discriminatory way. (c) The technical equipment allows the detection of entry and exit points of the vehicle across national borders.
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 j – paragraph 1 – second sentence To that end, Member States shall cooperate in establishing methods for enabling road users to pay tolls and user charges 24 hours a day,
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 j – paragraph 1 – second sentence "To that end, Member States shall cooperate in establishing methods for enabling road users to pay tolls and user charges 24 hours a day, at least at major sales outlets,
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 j – paragraph 1 – second sentence "To that end, Member States shall cooperate in establishing methods for enabling road users to pay tolls and user charges 24 hours a day, at least at major sales outlets, using common and/or electronic means of payment, inside and outside the Member States in which they are applied.";
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 j – paragraph 1 – second sentence "To that end, Member States shall cooperate in establishing methods for enabling road users to pay tolls and user charges 24 hours a day, at least at major sales outlets, using common or electronic means of payment, inside and outside the Member States in which they are applied.";
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 j – paragraph 3 3. Where a Member State levies a toll on a vehicle, the total amount of the toll, the amount of the infrastructure charge, the amount of the external-cost charge, and the amount of the congestion charge, where applied, shall be indicated in a receipt, upon request, provided to the road user, where possible by electronic means.
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC 3. Where a Member State levies a toll on a vehicle, the total amount of the toll, the amount of the infrastructure charge, the amount of the external-cost charge, and the amount of the congestion charge, where applied, shall be indicated in a receipt, upon request, provided to the road user, where possible by electronic means.
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 k Without prejudice to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, this Directive does not affect the freedom of Member States which introduce a system of tolls to provide for appropriate compensation provided that they do not distort or have a negative impact on local and/or habitual haulers.
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point -a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 -a in paragraph 2, the first sub- paragraph is replaced by: Member States shall use the revenues generated from infrastructure and external costs charges to carry out road network maintenance and upkeep, including the development of an intelligent and connected road infrastructure.
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point -a a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 - point a a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 (aa) paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: The Member States shall reinvest income from the collection of infrastructure charges in developing and maintaining the transport system as a whole, as well as streamlining the transport system and, more specifically, the road safety system. Member States shall reinvest income from the collection of external costs in measures that encourage the decarbonisation of the transport sector, the development of more sustainable transport infrastructure, and the promotion of means of transport with a reduced environmental impact.
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a a (new) (a a) To support the development of a European transport network, revenues generated from distance-based infrastructure charging shall be used to carry out road maintenance and improve road safety, including by building safe and secure parking areas with appropriate facilities to meet the requirements laid down in Regulation No 561/2006.
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Directive 1999//62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 (3) Revenues generated from
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Directive 1999//62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. Revenues generated from congestion charges, or the equivalent in financial value of these revenues
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Directive 1999//62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) eliminating bottlenecks on their networks wherever the charge is applied and on the trans-European transport network;
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) eliminating bottlenecks and missing links on the trans-European transport network, and maintaining it;
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) developing alternative infrastructure and multimodal hubs for transport users.;
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) discount rate (bono social) for persons displaced to the outskirts of cities;
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3a (new) 3 a. (ba) the following paragraph 3a is added: Given that there is no level playing field for infrastructures charges across all modes of transport, Member States shall put in place a time-limited compensation scheme for the use of railway infrastructure. This scheme shall cover the reimbursement of demonstrably unpaid infrastructure costs of road transport in so far as these costs exceed the equivalent costs of rail.
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b – point 1 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3a (new) Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new) Directive 1999//62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) (14 a) In Article 9, the following paragraph 2a is inserted: 2a. Call for the introduction of fullest and strictest earmaking and for the reinvestment of financial income from a toll charge to road infrastructure;
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. E
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999//62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point h (h) an evaluation, based on objective criteria, of the state of maintenance of the road infrastructure on the territory of the Member State,
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point h (h) an evaluation, based on objective criteria, of the state of maintenance of the road infrastructure on the territory of the Member State and the safety aspects of the road infrastructure, and its evolution since the last report;
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999/62/EC (i) an evaluation of the level of congestion on the tolled network in peak hours, based on real life traffic observations performed of a representative number of congested road stretches of the concerned network,
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point ia (new) (i a) an evaluation of parking areas and their fulfilment with the minimum requirements as defined in Regulation ../... amending Regulation (EU) No 561/2006 as regards on minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods (2017/0122(COD)).
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (new) Directive 99/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point h (i a) an evaluation of rest areas with a focus on the availability of parking lots and the quality of those facilities for the users in accordance with Regulation 561/2006;
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point h (ia) An evaluation, based on objective information, of the benefits of reinvesting external costs in measures aimed at reducing the environmental impact.
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point i b (new) (i b) The total revenues raised through mark-ups and on which road sections they have been levied.
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (new) Directive 99/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point i b (new) (i b) the quality of road surface and other related maintenance issues;
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (new) Directive 99/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point i c (new) (i c) road safety;
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (new) Directive 99/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point i d (new) (i d) the level of congestion;
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directiva 1999/62/CE Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. For the evaluation of the quality of the parts of the road network on which tolls or user charges are applied, Member States shall use an harmonised set of key performance indicators
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) The level of CO2 emissions in the air.
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c b (new) (3a) The Member States shall make the results of reinvesting infrastructure charges, charges for external costs and traffic congestion charges, publicly available to users, making them visible in real time also in relation to the stretches of road concerned, highlighting, in particular, the benefits in terms of increased road safety, a reduced environmental impact and reduced traffic congestion.
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. Within three years after [the entry into force of the revised Directive], the Commission shall
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. 4. Within t
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive 2 years after entry into force by at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point b – point i – indent 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III – Section 2 – point 2.1 – indent 6 — Costs shall be apportioned to heavy
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point b – point i – indent 1 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III – Section 2 – point 2.1 – indent 6 — Costs shall be apportioned to
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – section 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III a – section 2 – paragraph 1 Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIa – section 2 – paragraph 1 Where a Member State intends to apply higher external-cost charges than the
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c This section shall apply where a Member State intends to apply higher external cost charges than the
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III a – section 4 – subsection 4.1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Where a Member State intends to apply higher external-cost charges than the
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point c Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III a – section 4 – subsection 4.2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Where a Member State intends to apply higher external-cost charges than the
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annexe IIIb – title Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III b – Table 2 – footnotes 1 and 2 Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III b – Table 2 – title Table 2:
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annex IIIb – paragraph 2 The values of Tables 1 and 2 may be multiplied by a reference factor of up to
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 1 – point d Directive 1999/62/EC Annex III b – paragraph 2 The values of Tables 1 and 2 may be multiplied by a factor of up to
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex VII – third paragraph The lower rates shall apply for any
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Title 1 Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Progress towards the goal, which the Commission set out in its White Paper of 28 March 201113, namely to move towards the full application of the 'polluter pays' and 'user pays' principles, to generate revenue and ensure financing for future transport investments has been slow and inconsistencies persist in the application of road infrastructure charging across the Union. The main reason for the underfinancing of the road network can be found elsewhere, however, in the failure to ring-fence the receipts from the charges levied. _________________ 13 White Paper of 28 March 2011 ‘Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system' (COM(2011)
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) The ‘Handbook on External Costs of Transport’ of the European Commission DG MOVE should be considered as a basis for fixing minima of amounts for the internalisation of external costs.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 b (new) Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its Communication on a European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility14, the Commission announced that it would propose the revision of the Directive on the charging for lorries to enable charging also on the basis of carbon dioxide differentiation, and the extension of some of its principles to buses and coaches as well as passenger cars and vans, also including, in Annex IV of the present proposal, combinations of vehicles with 2+4 axles , 3+1 axles and more than 9 axles. _________________ 14 COM(2016) 501 final.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its Communication on a European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility14, the Commission announced that it would propose the revision of the Directive on the charging for lorries
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its Communication on a European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility14, the Commission announced that it would propose the revision of the Directive on the charging for lorries to enable charging also on the basis of carbon dioxide differentiation, and the extension of some of its principles to buses and coaches as well as passenger cars and vans. _________________ 14 COM(2016) 501 final. COM(2016) 501 final.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All heavy duty vehicles have significant impact on road infrastructure and contribute to air pollution, while light duty vehicles are at the source of the majority of the negative environmental and social impacts from road transport related to emissions and congestion. In the interest of equal treatment and fair competition, it should be ensured that vehicles so far not covered by the framework set out in
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All heavy duty vehicles have significant impact on road infrastructure and contribute to air pollution, while light duty vehicles are at the source of the
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All heavy duty vehicles have significant impact on road infrastructure and contribute to air pollution, while light duty vehicles are at the source of the majority of the negative environmental and social impacts from road transport related to emissions and congestion. In the interest of equal treatment and fair competition, it should be ensured that vehicles so far not
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All heavy duty vehicles have significant impact on road infrastructure and contribute to air pollution, while light duty vehicles are at the source of the majority of the negative environmental and social impacts from road transport related to emissions and congestion. In the interest of equal treatment and fair competition, it should be ensured that vehicles so far not covered by the framework set out in Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 in respect of tolls and user charges are included into
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All heavy duty vehicles have significant impact on road infrastructure and contribute to air pollution, while light duty vehicles are at the source of the majority of the negative environmental and social impacts from road transport related to emissions and congestion. In the interest of equal treatment and fair competition, it should be ensured that vehicles so far not covered by the framework set out in Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 in respect of tolls and user charges are included into this framework. The scope of that Directive should therefore be extended to heavy duty vehicles other than those intended for the
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All heavy duty vehicles have significant impact on road infrastructure and contribute to air pollution, while light duty vehicles are at the source of the majority of the negative environmental and social impacts from road transport related to emissions and congestion. In the interest of equal treatment and fair competition, it should be ensured that vehicles so far not covered by the framework set out in Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 in respect of tolls and user charges are included into this framework. The scope of that Directive should therefore be extended to heavy duty vehicles other than those intended for the carriage of goods and to light duty vehicles, including passenger cars. _________________ 15 Directive 1999/62/EC of the European
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All heavy duty vehicles have significant impact on road infrastructure and contribute to air pollution, while light duty vehicles are at the source of the majority of the negative environmental and social impacts from road transport related to emissions and congestion. In the interest of equal treatment and fair competition, it should be ensured that vehicles so far not covered by the framework set out in Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council115 in respect of tolls and user charges are included into this framework. The scope of that Directive should therefore be extended to heavy duty vehicles other than those intended for the carriage of goods and to light duty vehicles
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) All heavy duty vehicles have
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The choice between time-based user charges
source: 615.519
2018/03/01
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Annex V – section 1 – point c table 2 – column 2 – row 4 Buses and coaches
source: 618.188
2021/12/15
TRAN
32 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 10 10. From … [
Amendment 10 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7b – paragraph 2 2. The costs taken into account shall relate to the network or the part of the network on which infrastructure charges for heavy-duty vehicles are levied and to the vehicles that are subject to those charges.
Amendment 11 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 1999/62 EC Article 7ca – paragraph 1 1. When levying an external-cost charge for air or noise pollution, Member States shall take into account the costs relating to the network or the part of the network on which that charge is levied and the vehicles that are subject to that charge. Revenues generated from external-cost charges, or the equivalent in financial value of those revenues, shall be used to address the problem of air or noise pollution.
Amendment 12 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7ca – paragraph 3 3. From … [4 years after the date of entry into force of this amending Directive], Member States shall apply an external-cost charge for traffic-based air and noise pollution to heavy-duty vehicles on the tolled network referred to in Article 7(1).
Amendment 13 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7ca – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 4. Member States
Amendment 14 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7ca – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 15 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7cb – paragraph 3 Amendment 16 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 (b) the mark-up does not exceed
Amendment 17 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the mark-up does not exceed 15 % of the weighted average infrastructure charge calculated in accordance with Article 7b(1) and Article 7e of this Directive, except where the revenue generated is invested in cross-border sections of a core network corridor identified in accordance with Chapter IV of
Amendment 18 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7f – paragraph 2 Amendment 19 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7f – paragraph 2 Amendment 2 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7 – paragraph 12 12. Where Member States apply a common system for user charges in accordance with Article 8, those Member States shall adapt or discontinue the common system by … [
Amendment 20 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7ga – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Member States shall vary
Amendment 21 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7ga – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall apply that variation to the sub-groups of heavy-duty vehicles covered by Article 2(1), points (a) to (d), of Regulation (EU) 2019/1242, at the latest two years after the publication of the reference CO2 emissions for those vehicle sub-groups in the implementing acts adopted in accordance with Article 11(1) of that Regulation. That variation according to sub-groups of heavy-duty vehicles shall be replaced until 2025 by a variation which is based on the common Union methodology for the assessment and the consistent data reporting of the full life-cycle CO2 emissions of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles that are placed on the Union, in accordance with Article 10 (7) of Regulation (EU) 2019/631.
Amendment 22 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7ga – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5 Without prejudice to the reduction of rates provided for in paragraph 3, Member States may provide for reduced rates of
Amendment 23 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7ga – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 24 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 11. The application of the variation of charges based on CO2 emissions referred to in this Article shall
Amendment 25 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7gb – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductry part Without prejudice to paragraph 2 of this Article, lower rates of
Amendment 26 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7gb – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. From 1 January 2026, where technically practicable, Member States shall vary the
Amendment 27 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7gb – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 28 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directives 1999/62/EC 3. Subject to the conditions set out in paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States
Amendment 29 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point b Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7i – paragraph 2a 2a. Member States may provide for discounts or reductions
Amendment 3 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 3. If user charges are applied in respect of passenger cars, the use of the infrastructure shall be made available at least for the following periods: a day, a week or 10 days or both, a month or two months or both, and a year. The two- monthly rate shall not exceed
Amendment 30 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. By … [
Amendment 31 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the variation of
Amendment 32 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) the variation of
Amendment 4 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 5 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 In respect of user charge schemes adopted before … [the date of entry into force of
Amendment 6 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7aa – paragraph 1 Amendment 7 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7aa – paragraph 2 Amendment 8 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7aa – paragraph 3 Amendment 9 #
Council position Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directives 1999/62/EC Article 7aa – paragraph 4 source: 700.698
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/15/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-700698_EN.html
|
docs/15 |
|
events/13 |
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-700379_EN.html
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
TRAN/9/01267
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
TRAN/8/10069
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting Parliament 2nd reading |
events/12 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-615363_EN.html
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-615519_EN.html
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-618222_EN.html
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-618188_EN.html
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-613289_EN.html
|
events/8/docs |
|
events/1/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
events/5/body |
EP
|
events/10/body |
EP
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.363
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.519
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.222
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.188
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.289&secondRef=03
|
docs/10 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/docs |
|
events/9 |
|
events/10 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31256&j=0&l=en
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title |
Old
Joint Declaration 2018New
Joint Declaration 2018-19 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
124952
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2888)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2888)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3560)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3560)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.289&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.289&secondRef=03 |
docs/0/docs/0 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.363New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.363 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.519New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.519 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.222New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.222 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.188New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.188 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.289&secondRef=03New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.289&secondRef=03 |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0202_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0202_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181024&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181024&type=CRE |
events/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0423_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0423_EN.html |
events/6/body |
EP
|
events/7/body |
EP
|
events/12/body |
EP
|
procedure/Notes |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/12 |
|
docs/10/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0202&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0202_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0423New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0423_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
commission |
|
committees |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure |
|