Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | SALINI Massimiliano ( PPE) | SEHNALOVÁ Olga ( S&D), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR), VAN MILTENBURG Matthijs ( ALDE), DALUNDE Jakop G. ( Verts/ALE), PAKSAS Rolandas ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ŠKRIPEK Branislav ( ECR) | Csaba SÓGOR ( PPE) |
Committee Recast Technique Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 091-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 091-p1Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitating cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive (EU) 2019/520 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitating cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union.
CONTENT: the Directive lays down the conditions necessary to:
- ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems on the entire Union road network, urban and interurban motorways, major and minor roads, and various structures, such as tunnels or bridges, and ferries; and
- facilitate the cross-border exchange of vehicle registration data regarding the vehicles and the owners or holders of vehicles for which there was a failure to pay road fees of any kind in the Union.
The Directive shall not prevent Member States from levying charges on particular types of vehicles, or from determining the level of such fees and their purpose.
Technological solutions
The amended directive provides that all new electronic road toll systems that require the installation or use of on-board equipment will have to use one or more of the following technologies to carry out electronic toll transactions: (a) satellite positioning; (b) mobile communications; (c) 5.8 GHz microwave technology.
European Electronic Toll Service (EETS) providers shall make available to EETS users on-board equipment suitable for use with the relevant electronic road toll systems in service in the Member States and using the above-mentioned technologies and that is interoperable and capable of communicating with all these systems.
The on-board equipment (OBE) may use its own hardware and software, use elements of other hardware and software present in the vehicle, or both. For the purpose of communicating with other hardware systems present in the vehicle, the OBE may use technologies other than those listed in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, provided that security, quality of service and privacy are ensured.
On-board equipment which uses satellite positioning technology and is placed on the market after 19 October 2021 shall be compatible with the positioning services provided by the Galileo and the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (‘EGNOS’) systems.
Interoperability
The new rules shall make electronic toll systems more interoperable and therefore more cost-effective and user-friendly. They shall remove administrative barriers, such as cumbersome authorisation procedures and non-standard local technical specifications. As a result, electronic toll service providers shall be able to access the toll collection market more easily.
General principles of the European Electronic Toll Service (EETS)
Each Member State shall establish a procedure for registering EETS providers. It shall grant the registration to entities which are established on its territory, which request registration and which can demonstrate that they fulfil a number of requirements.
Toll chargers should give access to their EETS domain to EETS providers on a non-discriminatory basis. To ensure transparency and non-discriminatory access to EETS domains for all EETS providers, toll chargers shall publish all the necessary information relating to access rights in an EETS domain statement.
All OBE user rebates or discounts on tolls offered by a Member State or by a toll charger should be transparent, publicly announced and available under the same conditions to clients of EETS providers.
EETS providers shall be entitled to fair remuneration, calculated based on a transparent, non-discriminatory and identical methodology.
Conciliation Bodies shall have the power to verify that the contractual conditions imposed on any EETS provider are non-discriminatory.
Procedure for the exchange of information between Member States
In order to allow the identification of the vehicle, and the owner or holder of that vehicle, for which a failure to pay a road fee has been established, each Member State shall grant access only to other Member States' national contact points to the following national vehicle registration data, with the power to conduct automated searches.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the exchange of information between Member States takes place only between the national contact points. In the context of this data exchange, particular attention shall be paid to the adequate protection of personal data.
Where the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee decides to initiate follow-up proceedings in relation to the failure to pay a road fee, it shall, for the purpose of ensuring the respect of fundamental rights, send the information letter in the language of the registration document of the vehicle, if available, or in one of the official languages of the Member State of registration.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 18.4.2019.
TRANSPOSITION: no later than 19.10.2021.
The European Parliament adopted by 536 votes to 53, with 17 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitating cross border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union (recast).
The position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Subject matter and scope
T he directive would lay down the necessary conditions to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems on the entire EU road network and to facilitate the cross-border sharing of registration data concerning vehicles and owners or keepers of vehicles that do not pay road charges even when their vehicles are registered in another EU country.
The directive would not prevent Member States from levying charges on particular types of vehicles, or from determining the level of such fees and their purpose.
Technological solutions
The amended directive provides that all new electronic road toll systems that require the installation or use of on-board equipment will have to use one or more of the following technologies to carry out electronic toll transactions: (a) satellite positioning; (b) mobile communications; (c) 5.8 GHz microwave technology.
Existing electronic road toll systems that require the installation or use of on-board equipment and other technologies should comply with these requirements in the event of significant technological progress.
Characteristics of the European Electronic Toll Service (EETS)
The concept of ‘EETS’ would cover toll services provided by an EETS provider to an EETS user under contract in one or more EETS sectors, namely a road, road network, bridge, tunnel or ferry, at the level of which tolls are collected by means of an electronic road toll system.
EETS should make it possible to develop intermodality while ensuring that the user-pays and polluter-pays principles are respected.
Requirements for EETS providers
The providers would seek registration in a Member State where they are established and meet certain requirements such as certification, proof of technical equipment and EC declaration, proof of competence, appropriate financial standing, implementation of a risk management plan subject to audit at least every two years.
Rights and obligations of EETS providers
S uch providers should (i) conclude contracts covering all EETS domains on the territory of at least four Member States within 36 months of their registration; (ii) conclude contracts covering all EETS domains in a given Member State within 24 months of the conclusion of the first contract in that Member State, unless otherwise agreed. Once contracts have been concluded, EETS providers would ensure coverage of all EETS domains at all times.
EETS providers would cooperate with toll chargers in their enforcement efforts. Where a failure by a road user to pay a road fee is suspected, the toll charger may request that the EETS provider provide it with data relating to the vehicle involved in the suspected failure to pay a road fee. The EETS provider shall ensure that such data is instantly available.
Rights and obligations of the toll charger
T oll chargers shall accept on a non-discriminatory basis any EETS provider requesting to provide EETS on the EETS domain(s) under the toll charger’s responsibility.
They should publish all necessary information concerning access rights in an EETS domain statement.
Each Member State with at least two EETS sectors on its territory should designate a single contact office for EETS providers. The toll would be determined by the toll charger according, inter alia, to the vehicle’s classification. The toll charged by toll chargers to EETS users should not exceed the corresponding national/local toll. All on-board-equipment user rebates or discounts on tolls offered by a Member State or by a toll charger should be available under the same conditions to clients of EETS providers.
EETS providers shall be entitled to remuneration by the toll charger.
Conciliation body
Each Member State with at least one EETS domain shall designate or establish a Conciliation Body in order to facilitate mediation between toll chargers with an EETS domain located within its territory and EETS providers that have contracts or are in contractual negotiations with those toll chargers.
Each Member State with at least one EETS domain shall lay down a mediation procedure in order to enable a toll charger or an EETS provider to request the relevant Conciliation Body to intervene in any dispute relating to their contractual relations or negotiations.
Pilot toll systems
P ilot toll systems incorporating new technologies which do not comply with one or more of the provisions of the directive could be authorised for an initial period not exceeding three years subject to prior agreement by the Commission.
Data protection
The General Data Protection Regulation (EU Regulation 2016/679) and national laws, regulations and administrative provisions transposing Directives 2002/58/EC and (EU) 2016/680 would apply to personal data processed under the directive.
Personal data should only be processed in order to facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on defaults on road user charges. Member States should also ensure that data subjects have the right to update, rectify and delete their processed personal data without delay in case of inaccuracy.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Massimiliano SALINI (EPP, IT) on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitating cross border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union (recast).
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Subject matter and scope : the Directive shall lay down the necessary conditions in order to:
ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems on the entire road network , urban and interurban motorways, major and minor roads, and various structures such as tunnels, bridges and ferries;
facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union , including on the failure to pay those fees to be collected manually on infrastructures to which this Directive applies, as well as those fees charged in urban areas as referred to in Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, or those fines for infringements concerning the payment of fees.
The Directive shall not prevent Member States from levying charges on particular types of vehicles, or from determining the level of such fees and their purpose.
Technological solutions : Members proposed to specify in the Directive (instead of an annex) that all new electronic toll systems which require the installation or use of on-board equipment shall, for carrying out electronic toll transactions, use one or more of the following technologies: (a) satellite positioning ; (b) mobile communications ; (c) 5.8 GHz microwave technology .
Each vehicle shall have only one on-board unit, and that on-board unit may be linked to only one vehicle
Characteristics of the European Electronic Toll Service (EETS) : the term ‘EETS’ means the toll service provided, under a contract, by an EETS provider to an EETS user.
The EETS shall allow for contracts to be concluded irrespective of the place of registration of the vehicle, the nationality of the parties to the contract, and the zone or section on the road network in respect of which the road fee is due, taking into account the means of payment valid in that Member State.
The EETS shall be provided through contractual agreements between the service providers and the toll collectors which guarantee that tolls are paid correctly. It shall allow intermodality to develop whilst guaranteeing compliance with the ‘user and polluter pays principle’ and developing advantages for other and more sustainable modes of transport.
Requirements for EETS providers : these providers shall seek registration in a Member State where they are established and meet certain requirements such as certification, proof of technical equipment and EC declaration, proof of competence, appropriate financial standing, implementation of a risk management plan subject to audit at least every two years.
Rights and obligations of EETS providers : such providers should (i) conclude contracts covering all EETS domains on the territory of at least four Member States within 36 months of their registration; (ii) conclude contracts covering all EETS domains in a given Member State within 24 months of the conclusion of the first contract in that Member State, unless otherwise agreed. Once contracts have been concluded, EETS providers shall ensure coverage of all EETS domains at all times.
EETS providers shall cooperate with toll chargers in their enforcement efforts . Where a failure by a road user to pay a road fee is suspected, the toll charger may request that the EETS provider provide it with data relating to the vehicle involved in the suspected failure to pay a road fee. The EETS provider shall ensure that such data is instantly available.
A decision by the competent authority of the Member State in whose territory a failure to pay a road fee has been established should automatically be recognised in the Member State of the owner or the holder of the vehicle.
Rights and obligations of the toll charger : toll chargers shall accept on a non-discriminatory basis any EETS provider requesting to provide EETS on the EETS domain(s) under the toll charger’s responsibility.
Each toll charger shall develop and maintain an EETS domain statement setting out the general conditions for EETS providers for accessing their toll domains. The toll charger shall be bound to respect its side of the planning. Each Member State with at least two EETS sectors on its territory should designate a single contact office for EETS providers. The toll shall be determined by the toll charger according, inter alia, to the vehicle’s classification. The toll charged by toll chargers to EETS users shall not exceed the corresponding national/local toll . All on-board-equipment user rebates or discounts on tolls offered by a Member State or by a toll charger should be available under the same conditions to clients of EETS providers.
EETS providers shall be entitled to remuneration by the toll charger.
Conciliation body : Members proposed to ensure a conciliation procedure in view to settle disputes between toll chargers and EETS providers during contract negotiations and in their contractual relationships. National conciliation bodies should be consulted by toll chargers and EETS providers in search of a dispute settlement relating to non-discriminatory access to EETS domains.
The conciliation bodies shall be empowered to verify that the contractual conditions imposed on any EETS provider are non-discriminatory.
Pilot toll systems : pilot toll systems incorporating new technologies which do not comply with one or more of the provisions of the Directive could be authorised for an initial period not exceeding three years subject to prior agreement by the Commission.
Data protection : the processing of personal data shall be carried out in accordance with EU standards. Where non-payment of a road user charge is considered a criminal offence by the Member State where the payment is due, Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply.
Personal data shall only be processed in order to facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on failures to pay road fees. Member States shall also ensure that data subjects have the right to update, rectify and erase without delay , in case of inaccuracy, their processed personal data.
PURPOSE: to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitating cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: interoperability is lacking in the current European electronic toll systems (EETS), which is a particular problem for cross-border traffic. At present, several " on-board units " on board vehicles are required to travel unhindered in different countries.
The costs are estimated at EUR 334 million a year currently and are expected to fall just below EUR 300 million a year by 2025 (without further EU action).
To address these issues, a Directive on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems was adopted in 2004. Some cross-border interoperability has been achieved, but in a number of countries it is still the case that only national ‘on-board units’ can be used to pay tolls.
EETS providers face considerable barriers to entry , such as discriminatory treatment by authorities (including protection of incumbents); long and changing acceptance procedures; and technical specificities in local systems that do not comply with established standards.
Another problem relates to the difficulty to identify the offender on the basis of the licence plate number when the vehicle is registered abroad. There is no legal basis at EU level for the exchange of vehicle registration data between Member States for the purpose of toll enforcement. The resulting revenue leakage for national, regional and local tolling schemes amounts to some EUR 300 million a year.
In this context, the Commission considers it necessary to provide for the widespread deployment of electronic toll systems in the Member States and neighbouring countries. These systems should be interoperable and based on open and public standards, available on a non-discriminatory basis to all system suppliers.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option aims to address all problems through legislation, keeping the ‘market-based’ approach taken in Decision 2009/750/EC on the definition of the European Electronic Toll Service and its technical elements.
The expected benefits are as follows:
for road users – cumulated savings of EUR 370 million (net present value – NPV) until 2025; for road network managers – savings of EUR 48 million (NPV) until 2025; for EETS providers – a reduction in regulatory burden linked to entering national markets and market expansion, with additional revenues of EUR 700 million a year.
Overall, the net cumulated benefit of the preferred policy option (benefits minus costs) is EUR 254 million (NPV) until 2025.
CONTENT: this proposal is a recast of an existing legal act (Directive 2004/52/EC).
Subject matter and scope : the proposed Directive lays down the conditions necessary to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitating cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union.
It shall apply to the electronic collection of all types of road fees on the entire Union road network, urban and inter-urban motorways, minor and major roads and various structures such as tunnels, bridges and ferries.
Technological solutions : all new electronic toll systems that require the installation or use of on-board equipment should use one or more of the technologies listed in Annex IV to the Directive to carry out electronic toll transactions.
The proposal provides that on-board equipment which uses satellite positioning technology is compatible with the positioning services provided by the Galileo and the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service ( 'EGNOS' ) systems and may be compatible with other satellite navigation systems.
EETS on-board equipment can link to other devices installed or present in the vehicle, such as satellite navigation systems or smartphones. It also clarifies that communication between the on-board equipment and such other devices may use technologies not listed in Annex IV (for example, Bluetooth).
Until 31 December 2027, EETS providers may provide users of light-duty vehicles with on-board equipment suitable for use only with the 5.8 GHz microwave technology.
Procedure for the cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences : for the investigation of the failure to pay road fees, the Member State shall grant other Member States' national contact points access to the following national vehicle registration data, with the power to conduct automated searches.
The system for exchanging information on those who fail to pay a road fee should use the same tools as the system used for exchanging information on road-safety-related traffic offenses provided for in Directive (EU) 2015/413 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)354
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2019/520
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 091 29.03.2019, p. 0045
- Draft final act: 00069/2018/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0122/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2019)004224
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)004224
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0199/2018
- Committee opinion: PE616.760
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.183
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3560/2017
- Committee draft report: PE615.481
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2887/2017
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
- Opinion on the recast technique: PE609.385
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0190
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0191
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0192
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0193
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2017)0280
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0190
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0191
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0192
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0193
- Opinion on the recast technique: PE609.385
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2887/2017
- Committee draft report: PE615.481
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3560/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.183
- Committee opinion: PE616.760
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)004224
- Draft final act: 00069/2018/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)354
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
- Contribution: COM(2017)0280
Activities
- Bill ETHERIDGE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitating cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union (A8-0199/2018 - Massimiliano Salini) (vote)
- 2016/11/22 Interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitating cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union (debate)
- Wim van de CAMP
- Nicola CAPUTO
- Isabella DE MONTE
- Notis MARIAS
- Matthijs van MILTENBURG
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
- Janusz ZEMKE
Votes
A8-0199/2018 - Massimiliano Salini - Am 90 14/02/2019 12:10:01.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
214 |
2017/0128(COD)
2018/02/21
TRAN
154 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) 'failure to pay a road fee' means the commission of an offence resulting in the failure by a road user to pay a road fee in a Member State, as defined by the relevant laws of that Member State. The road user is the sole responsible of the offence;
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point l (l) ‘vehicle’ means any power-driven vehicle, including motorcycles,
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) 'light-duty vehicle' means a
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o a (new) (o a) ‘urban vehicle access regulation scheme’ means a defined area with regulated access, most commonly to address issues such as poor air quality, pollution, congestion and accidents1a; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transp ort/files/themes/urban/studies/doc/2010_1 2_ars_final_report.pdf
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o a (new) (o a) “urban vehicle access regulation scheme” means a defined area with regulated access;
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 All new electronic toll systems which require the installation or use of on-board equipment shall, for carrying out electronic toll transactions, use one or more of the following technologies
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 All new electronic toll systems which require the installation or use of on-board equipment shall, for carrying out electronic toll transactions, use one or more of the following technologies
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Existing electronic toll systems which use technologies other than those listed in
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Existing electronic toll systems which use technologies other than those listed in Annex IV shall be comp
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. On-board equipment which uses satellite positioning technology shall be compatible with
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 EETS providers shall make available to users on-board equipment which is suitable for use, interoperable and capable of communicating with all electronic toll systems in service in the Member States using
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 EETS providers shall make available to users on-board equipment which is suitable for use, interoperable and capable of communicating with all electronic toll systems in service in the Member States using the technologies listed in
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The on-board equipment may use its own hardware and software, use elements of other hardware and software present in the vehicle, or both. For the purpose of communicating with other hardware systems present in the vehicle, the on-board equipment may use technologies other than those listed in
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The on-board equipment may comprise several gadgets linked physically or remotely, including equipment already installed in the motor vehicle such as navigation systems; it may use its own hardware and software, use elements of other hardware and software present in the vehicle, or both. For the purpose of communicating with other hardware systems present in the vehicle, the on- board equipment may use technologies other than those listed in Annex IV.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The on-board equipment may use its own hardware and software, use elements of other hardware and software present in the vehicle, or both. For the purpose of communicating with other hardware systems present in the vehicle, the on-board equipment may use technologies other than those listed in
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. Member States shall ensure that processing of personal data necessary for the operation of the EETS is carried out in accordance with the Union rules protecting the freedoms and fundamental rights of individuals, including their privacy, and that, in particular, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Directive (EU) 2016/680 and of Directive 2002/58/EC are complied with. The toll charger and toll operator shall not disclose any data to any entity in competition with the EETS provider and toll service provider, even if that entity is part of the same organisation as the toll charger and toll operator.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. Member States shall ensure that processing of personal data necessary for the operation of the EETS is carried out in accordance with the Union rules protecting the freedoms and fundamental rights of individuals, including their privacy, and that, in particular, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Directive (EU) 2016/680 and of Directive 2002/58/EC are complied with, while at the same time they shall allow the exchange of information with the other Member States in duly justified cases, such as failure to pay a road fee.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. Member States shall ensure that processing of personal data necessary for the operation of the EETS is carried out in accordance with the Union rules protecting the freedoms and fundamental rights of individuals, including their privacy, and that, in particular, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Directive (EU) 2016/680 and of Directive 2002/58/EC are complied with. These data shall only be used for purposes, as foreseen in this Directive.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Article 3 a Accounting 1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that legal entities which are toll service providers keep separate profit and loss accounts and balance sheets for activities performed in the role related to the provision of the toll service, as defined in standard ISO 17573:2010 and all other activities. Member States shall also take the necessary measures to ensure that these accounts and balance sheets are published separately for each type of activity and that cross subsidies between the activities performed in the role related to the provision of the toll service and other activities are excluded. 2. The accounting systems for the activities performed in a role related to the provision of the toll service and other activities shall be kept separate from accounts relating to any other type of activities so that a clear evaluation can be made of the costs and benefits related to activities performed in the role related to the provision of the toll service.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The EETS shall allow for contracts to be concluded irrespective of the place of registration of the vehicle, the nationality of the parties to the contract, and the zone or section on the road network in respect of which the road fee is due, taking into account the means of payment valid in that Member State.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The EETS shall allow intermodality to develop w
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The EETS shall allow intermodality to develop and deploy a sustainable transport system in Europe without creating disadvantages for other modes of transport.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Commercial conditions agreed bilaterally between toll chargers and EETS providers should be non- discriminatory and a fair reflection of the costs and risks borne by the parties. Conciliation Bodies should be empowered to verify it regarding to the conditions imposed to national ETC providers. To serve local needs of their customers, Toll chargers have to be authorized to issue specific commercial conditions reserved for local contexts.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Toll charger shall accept on a non-discriminatory basis any EETS provider requesting to provide EETS services under the toll charger’s responsibility independently of the toll service provider.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Where a failure by a road user to pay a road fee is suspected, the toll charger and/or the toll service provider may request the EETS provider to provide them with data related to the vehicle involved in the suspected failure to pay a road fee and to the owner or holder of that vehicle who is a client of the EETS provider. Data provided by EETS provider to the toll charger and/or toll service provider shall be treated in compliance with Article 8.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph new5 new5. The Commission shall request the relevant standardisation bodies, in particular the CEN, in accordance with the procedure laid down by Directive 2015/1535/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council23 to swiftly adopt standards applicable to electronic toll systems with regard to the technologies listed in A
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph new5 new5. The Commission shall request the relevant standardisation bodies, in particular the CEN and ETSI, in accordance with the procedure laid down by Directive 2015/1535/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council23 to swiftly adopt standards applicable to electronic toll systems with regard to the technologies listed in Annex IV , and to update them where necessary . The Commission shall request that the standardisation bodies ensure the continual compatibility of interoperability constituents. _________________ 23 Directive 2015/1535/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1).
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 a (new) Article 4 a Requirements to be fulfilled by the EETS providers EETS providers shall seek registration in a Member State where they are established, which shall be granted if they fulfil the following requirements: (a) hold EN ISO 9001 certification or equivalent; (b) demonstrate having the technical equipment and the EC declaration or certificate attesting the conformity of the interoperability constituents to specifications; (c) demonstrate competence in the provision of electronic tolling services or in relevant domains; (d) have appropriate financial standing; (e) maintain a global risk management plan, which is audited at least every 2 years; (f) be of good repute.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 b (new) Article 4 b Rights and obligations of EETS Providers 1. EETS providers shall conclude EETS contracts covering all EETS domains on the territories of at least 4 Member States within 36 months following their registration in accordance with Article 4a. They shall conclude contracts covering all EETS domain in a given Member State within 24 months from concluding the first contract in that Member State, except for those EETS domains in which the responsible toll chargers do not comply with the provisions of Article 4d. 2. EETS providers shall maintain at all times the coverage of all EETS domains once they have concluded contracts therefor. Where an EETS provider is not able to maintain coverage of an EETS domain because the toll charger does not comply with its obligations, it shall re- establish the coverage of the concerned domain as soon as possible. 3. EETS providers shall cooperate with toll chargers in their enforcement efforts. Where a failure by a road user to pay a road fee is suspected, the toll charger may request that the EETS provider provide it with data relating to the vehicle involved in the suspected failure to pay a road fee and to the owner or holder of that vehicle who is a client of the EETS provider. The EETS provider shall ensure that such data is instantly available. The toll charger shall ensure that such data is not disclosed to any other toll service provider. If the toll charger is integrated with a toll service provider in one entity, it shall put in place appropriate measures and procedures to ensure that the data is used for the sole purpose of enforcement.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 c (new) Article 4 c Rights and obligations of the Toll Charger 1. Each toll charger shall develop and maintain an EETS domain statement setting out the general conditions for EETS providers for accessing their toll domains. 2. Where a new electronic toll collection system is created, the future toll charger responsible for this system shall publish the EETS domain statement with sufficient notice to allow for an accreditation of interested EETS providers to conclude at the latest one month before the operational launch of the new system, with due regard to the length of the process of assessment of the conformity to specifications and of the suitability for use of interoperability constituents. 3. Where an electronic toll collection system is substantially modified, the toll charger shall publish the revised EETS domain statement with sufficient notice to allow already accredited EETS providers to adapt their interoperability constituents to the new requirements and obtain re- accreditation where required at the latest one month before the operational launch of the modified system, with due regard to the length of the process of assessment of the conformity to specifications and of the suitability for use of interoperability constituents. The toll charger shall establish and publish in the EETS domain statement the detailed planning of the process of assessment or reassessment of the conformity to specifications and of the suitability for use of interoperability constituents, which allows for the accreditation or reaccreditation of interested EETS providers at the latest one month before the operational launch of the new or substantially modified system. The toll charger shall be bound to respect its side of the planning.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 d (new) Article 4 d Toll chargers shall accept on a non- discriminatory basis any EETS provider requesting to provide EETS on the EETS domain(s) under the toll charger’s responsibility. Acceptance of an EETS provider in a toll domain shall be subject to the provider's compliance with the obligations and general conditions set out in the EETS domain statement. Toll chargers shall not require the EETS provider to use any specific technical solutions or processes which hinder the interoperability of an EETS provider's interoperability constituents with electronic toll collection systems in other EETS domains. If a toll charger and an EETS provider cannot reach an agreement, the matter may be referred to the conciliation body responsible for the relevant toll domain.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 e (new) Article 4 e Each Member State shall ensure that the contracts between the toll charger and the EETS provider, regarding the provision of EETS on the territory of that Member State, permit that the invoice for the toll is issued to the EETS user directly by the EETS provider. The Toll Charger may require that the EETS Provider invoices the user in the name and on behalf of the toll charger, and the EETS provider shall comply with that request.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 f (new) Article 4 f Each Member State with at least 2 EETS domains on its territory shall designate a single contact office for EETS providers. At the request of the EETS provider, the contact office shall facilitate and coordinate early contacts between the EETS provider and the toll chargers responsible for the EETS domains on the territory of the Member State. The contact office may be a person, a public or a private body.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 g (new) Article 4 g The toll charged by toll chargers to EETS users shall not exceed the corresponding national/local toll. All on-board- equipment user rebates or discounts on tolls offered by a Member State or by a toll charger should be available under the same conditions to clients of EETS providers.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 h (new) Article 4 h Remuneration 1. EETS providers shall be entitled to remuneration by the toll charger. 2. The methodology for defining the remuneration of the EETS providers shall be transparent, non-discriminatory and the same for all EETS providers accredited to a given EETS domain.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 i (new) Article 4 i 1. The toll shall be determined by the toll charger according inter alia to the vehicle’s classification. A vehicle’s classification shall be determined on the basis of the vehicle classification parameters. In the event of a discrepancy between the vehicle classification used by the EETS provider and the toll charger, the toll charger’s classification shall prevail, unless an error can be demonstrated. 2. In addition to requiring payment from an EETS provider for any substantiated toll declaration, a toll charger may require payment from an EETS provider for any substantiated toll non-declaration relative to any user account managed by that EETS provider. 3. Where an EETS provider has sent a toll charger a list of invalidated on-board equipment, the EETS provider shall not be held liable for any further toll incurred through the use of such invalidated on- board equipment. The number of entries in the list of invalidated OBE, the list’s format and its updating frequency shall be agreed between toll chargers and EETS providers. 4. In microwave-based toll systems toll chargers shall communicate substantiated toll declarations to EETS providers for tolls incurred by their respective EETS users.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 j (new) Article 4 j Conciliation Body 1. Each Member State with at least one EETS domain shall designate or establish a conciliation body in order to facilitate mediation between toll chargers with an EETS domain located within its territory and EETS providers which have contracts or are in contractual negotiations with those toll chargers. 2. The conciliation body shall be empowered, in particular, to verify that the contractual conditions imposed by a toll charger on EETS providers are non- discriminatory. It shall be empowered to verify that the EETS is remunerated in line with the principles provided in this Directive. 3. The Member States referred to in paragraph 1 shall take the necessary measures to ensure that their conciliation bodies are independent in their organisation and legal structure from the commercial interests of toll chargers and toll service providers.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 k (new) Article 4 k Registers 1. For the purposes of the implementation of this Decision, each Member State shall keep a national electronic register of the following: (a) the EETS domains within their territory, including information relating to: – the corresponding toll chargers, – the tolling technologies employed, – the toll context data, – the EETS domain statement, – the EETS providers having EETS contracts with the toll chargers active in their area of competence. (b) the EETS providers to whom it has granted registration. (c) the details of a contact office referred to in Article 4j , for EETS including a contact e-mail address and telephone number. Unless otherwise specified, Member States shall verify at least once a year that requirements (a), (d), (e) and (f) in Article 4a are still met and update the register accordingly. The register shall also contain the conclusions of the audit foreseen in Article 4a(e). A Member State shall not be held liable for the actions of the EETS providers mentioned in its register. 2. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that all the data contained in the national electronic register is kept up-to-date and is accurate. 3. The registers shall be electronically accessible to the public. 4. These registers shall be available as of the day of entry into force of this Directive. 5. The Member States authorities in charge of the registers shall communicate by electronic means to their counterparts in the other Member States and the Commission the registers of EETS domains and EETS providers at the end of each calendar year. Any inconsistencies with the situation in a Member State shall be brought to the attention of the Member State of registration and of the Commission.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 l (new) Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) d
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 When conducting an automated search in the form of an outgoing request, the national contact point of the Member State in whose territory a road fee decision according to paragraph 1 is to be made or where there was a failure to pay a road fee shall use a full registration number.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 The Member State in whose territory a road fee decision according to paragraph 1 is to be made or where there was a failure to pay a road fee shall use the data obtained in order to establish who is liable for the failure to pay that fee.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the exchange of information is carried out by interoperable electronic means without exchange of data involving other databases which are not used for the purposes of this Directive. Member States shall ensure that such exchange of information is conducted in a cost-efficient and secure manner and that authorities not empowered under this Directive are not given access to data. Member States shall ensure the security and protection of the data transmitted, as far as possible using existing software applications such as the one referred to in Article 15 of Decision 2008/616/JHA and amended versions of those software applications, in compliance with Annex II to this Directive and with points 2 and 3 of Chapter 3 of the Annex to Decision 2008/616/JHA. The amended versions of the software applications shall provide for both online real-time exchange mode and batch exchange mode, the latter allowing for the exchange of multiple requests or responses within one message.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Under no circumstances shall Member States’ contact points allow private firms or individuals access to the data referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – title Information letter and follow-up proceedings on the failure to pay a road fee
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The competent domestic authority in the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee shall
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The electronic toll systems should be interoperable and based on open and public standards, available on a non- discriminatory basis to all system suppliers. The system for collecting payments for the use of road infrastructure should be simple and fair, and should not discriminate against drivers from other Member States. When determining the cost of payments, therefore, objective account should be taken of the vehicles' impact on the environment and on the technical condition of the roads.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. When sending the information letter to the owner, the holder of the vehicle or to the otherwise identified person suspected of failing to pay the road fee, the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee shall, in accordance with its law, include any relevant information, notably the nature of the failure to pay the road fee, the place, date and time of the failure to pay the road fee, the title of the texts of the national law infringed, the right to object and be given information, and the sanction and, where appropriate, data concerning the device used for detecting the offence. For that purpose, the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. When sending the information letter to
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (new) (1) The decision by the competent body in the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee, taken in accordance with its national law, shall be automatically recognised by the Member State of the owner, the holder of the vehicle or the otherwise identified person suspected of failing to pay the road fee.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 a (new) Article 6 a Arrangements for mutual assistance As from 2021, in order to enforce payment of road fees in the Union across borders, an arrangement for mutual assistance will operate under which the Member State of registration will assist the Member State in whose territory there has been a failure to pay a road fee in the recovery of road fees and fines. The Commission will adopt implementing acts for this purpose in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 11a.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall ensure that personal data processed under this Directive are,
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall ensure that all personal data processed under this Directive are only used for the purpose of facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on failures to pay road fees, and that the data subjects have the same rights to information, access, rectification, erasure and blocking, compensation and judicial redress as provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and the national laws, regulations or administrative provisions transposing Directive (EU) 2016/680. They shall also ensure that authorities not empowered under this Directive are not given access to data collected.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. Any person concerned shall have the right to obtain information, at no cost, on which personal data recorded in the Member State of registration were transmitted to the Member State in which there was a failure to pay a road fee, including the date of the request and the competent authority of the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall, by [
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3 a) These systems should include the possibility of intermodal interoperability, for developing advantages for other and more sustainable transport modes.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 - an assessment of the need to further facilitate the cross-border enforcement of the payment of road fees in the Union by establishing a mechanism of assistance by the Member State of registration to the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee in the recovery of road fees and fines. The assistance by the Member State of registration to the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay would be necessary, particularly where the use of automatic debit systems are being promoted, as is the case with free-flow technologies.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new) - an assessment on progress made on intermodality and interoperability aspects between satellite and conventional toll systems as well as the digital tachograph technology.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 11 amending Annex
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with article 11 concerning the definition of the specifications referred to in letter (b) of Article 4a.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 a (new) Article 11 a Committee procedure 1. The Commission shall be assisted by an Electronic Toll Committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council(**). 2. When reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. Where the committee delivers no opinion, the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 1 and 3 to 8 and Annexes II and III by [
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 1 and 3 to 8 and Annexes II and III by [
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 1 and 3 to 8 and Annexes II and III by [
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4 a) The proliferation of different administrative requirements for toll user registration from toll domains to toll domain should be unified in order to facilitate EETS adoption.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Artificial barriers to the operation of the internal market should be removed, while still allowing the Member States and the Union to implement a variety of road- charging policies for all types of vehicles at local, national or international level. The equipment installed in vehicles should allow such road-charging policies to be implemented in accordance with the principles of non-discrimination between the citizens of all Member States.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Artificial barriers to the operation of the internal market should be removed, while still allowing the Member States and the Union to implement a variety of road- charging policies for all types of vehicles at local, national or international level. The equipment installed in vehicles should allow such road-charging policies to be implemented in accordance with the principles of non-discrimination between the citizens of all Member States. The interoperability of electronic toll systems at Union level therefore needs to be ensured as soon as possible, without additional burden on the costs of the equipment installed and operated by the road operators as well as on the ETC service costs.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5)
Amendment 21 #
(5) Artificial barriers to the operation of the internal market should be removed, while still allowing the Member States and the Union to implement a variety of road- charging policies for all types of vehicles at local, national or international level. The equipment installed in vehicles should allow such road-charging policies to be implemented in accordance with the principles of non-discrimination between the citizens of all Member States. The interoperability of electronic toll systems at Union level therefore needs to be ensured as soon as possible in order to reduce financial outlay and the administrative burden.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) If a legal entity being a toll service provider also plays other roles in an electronic toll collection system, or has other activities not directly related with electronic toll collection, it should be required to keep separate profit and loss accounts for each type of its activities. Cross subsidies between these different activities should be excluded.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) Toll chargers should be obliged to give access to their EETS domain to EETS providers on a non-discriminatory basis.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 b (new) (5 b) To ensure transparency and non- discriminatory access to EETS domains for all EETS providers, toll chargers should publish all the necessary information relative to access rights in an EETS domain statement.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 c (new) (5 c) The EETS being a market-based service, EETS providers should not be forced to provide the service at once across the continent. However, in the interest of the users, EETS providers should be required to cover all EETS domains in any country in which they decide to provide their services. Furthermore, the Commission should ensure that the flexibility given to EETS providers does not lead to the exclusion from EETS of small or peripheral EETS domains.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 – introductory part (6) A European electronic toll service should help operators provide interoperability at technical, contractual and procedural level, covering:
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 – point a (a) a single contract between the clients and the operators offering the service, complying with a contractual set of rules allowing all operators and/or issuers to provide the service, giving access to the whole network; the contract should be valid for all toll domains.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6 a) The EETS domain statement should describe in detail the framework commercial conditions for EETS providers' operations in the EETS domain in question. In particular, it should describe the methodology used for calculating the remuneration of EETS providers.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 b (new) (6 b) EETS users should pay no more toll than they would for the corresponding national/local toll. All OBE user rebates or discounts on tolls offered by a Member State or by a toll charger should be available under the same conditions to clients of EETS Providers.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 c (new) (6 c) Where a new electronic toll collection system is being launched or an existing system is being substantially modified, the toll charger should be required to publish the new or updated EETS domain statements with sufficient notice to allow EETS providers to be accredited or re-accredited to the system at the latest one month before the day of its operational launch. The toll charger should be required to design and follow the procedure for, respectively, the accreditation or re-accreditation of EETS providers in such a way that the procedure can be concluded at the latest one month before the operational launch of the new or substantially amended system. Toll chargers should be made bound to respect their part of the planned procedure as defined in the EETS domain statement.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 d (new) (6 d) The EETS domain statement should set out in detail the procedure of accreditation of an EETS provider to the EETS domain, in particular the procedure for checking conformity to specifications and suitability for use of interoperability constituents. The procedure should be the same for all EETS providers.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 e (new) (6 e) Toll chargers should not be permitted to request or require from EETS providers any specific technical solutions which may jeopardise interoperability with other toll domains and with the existing interoperability constituents of the EETS provider.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) The Commission should consider the possibility of creating a financing mechanism to overcome any administrative or financial barriers impeding interoperability, in order to most quickly achieve the cost-saving objectives of this proposal;
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) EETS providers should be entitled to fair remuneration, calculated based on a transparent and non-discriminatory methodology.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) EETS providers should be entitled to fair remuneration, calculated based on a transparent and non-discrimatory methodology.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 b (new) (7 b) EETS providers should be allowed to issue invoices to the users. However, toll chargers should be allowed to request that invoices are sent on their behalf and in their name, as invoicing directly in the name of the EETS provider can in certain toll domains have adverse administrative and tax implications.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 c (new) (7 c) If a legal entity being a toll service provider also plays other roles in an electronic toll collection system, or has other activities not directly related with electronic toll collection, it should be required to keep separate profit and loss accounts for each type of its activities. Cross subsidies between these different activities should be excluded. However, physical or legal unbundling of the different activities (separation of companies) would be too intrusive and should therefore not be required.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8 a) Each Member State with at least two EETS domains should designate a contact office in the national administration for EETS Providers wishing to provide the EETS in its territory in order to facilitate their contacts with the Toll Chargers.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) For the purpose of covering, with their on-board equipment, the required communication technologies, EETS providers should be allowed to make use of- and link to other hardware and software systems already present in the vehicle such as satellite navigation systems
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Electronic tolling and co-operative ITS (C-ITS) applications use similar technologies and neighbouring frequency bands for short range vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Electronic tolling and co-operative ITS (C-ITS) applications use similar technologies and neighbouring frequency bands for short range vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication. The 5.8 GHz band should be protected for the use in tolling systems. In the future, the potential for merging electronic tolling with C-ITS in the 5.9 GHz band, currently used by C-
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Electronic tolling and co-operative ITS (C-ITS) applications use similar technologies and neighbouring frequency bands for short range vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Electronic tolling and co-operative ITS (C-ITS) applications use similar technologies
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The specific characteristics of electronic tolling systems which are today applied to light-duty vehicles should be taken into account. Since no such electronic tolling systems currently use satellite positioning or mobile communications, EETS providers should be allowed, for a limited period of time, to provide light-duty vehicles with on-board equipment suitable for use with the 5.8 GHz technology only. Measures to protect the band 5.8GHz in order to avoid potencial interferences from Wi-Fi in cars and other C-ITS devices should be explored.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13 a) To deal with the problem of cross- border enforcement of toll evasions new mechanisms and legal agreements should be implemented, using a simple automatic mechanism for the exchange of information between Member States. That system should include all types of vehicles and all types of electronic toll systems, including video-tolling. The information provided by the use of this automatic mechanism should allow Member States to follow up on cases of failure to pay tolls by non-resident drivers.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) For reasons of consistency and efficient use of resources, the system for exchanging information on those who fail to pay a road fee should use the same tools as the system used for exchanging information on road-safety-related traffic offenses provided for in Directive (EU) 2015/413 of the European Parliament and of the Council18. _________________ 18 Directive (EU) 2015/413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety- related traffic offences (OJ L 68, 13.3.2015, pp. 9-25).
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15 a) Toll chargers should be allowed to request from the EETS provider, within the framework of toll enforcement activities and where it is presumed that the driver of a vehicle has failed to pay a road fee data relating to the vehicles and to the owners or holders of vehicles who are the EETS provider's clients. The toll charger should prevent this data, which can be commercially sensitive, from being used for any purpose other than enforcement. In particular, the toll charger should be required not to disclose the data to any of the EETS provider's competitors.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15 a) The technology used for electronic road charging should run free of radio interference.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Member States should be required to provide the Commission information and data necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the system for exchanging information on those who fail to pay a road fee. The Commission should be required to assess the data and information obtained, and to propose, if necessary, amendments to the legislation. Cross-border enforcement of road fees and of fines for infringements of fee regulations requires an arrangement for mutual assistance between Member States.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16 a) To ensure that all users in urban vehicle access regulation schemes are treated on non-discriminatory basis, local authorities should have the ability to access vehicle databases.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16 a) A conciliation procedure should be ensured in view to settle disputes between toll chargers and EETS providers during contract negotiations and in their contractual relationships. National Conciliation Bodies should be consulted by toll chargers and EETS providers in search of a dispute settlement relating to non-discriminatory access to EETS domains.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 b (new) (16 b) The Conciliation Bodies should be empowered to verify that the contractual conditions imposed on any EETS provider are non-discriminatory. In particular, they should be empowered to verify that the remuneration offered by the toll charger to the EETS providers respects the principles of this Directive.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The introduction of electronic toll systems will entail the processing of personal data
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The introduction of electronic toll systems will entail the processing of personal data. Such processing needs to be carried out in accordance with Union rules, as set out, inter alia, in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council19 , Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council20 and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council21 . The right to protection of personal data is explicitly recognised by Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. These data should not be used for other purposes than those foreseen in this legislation. _________________ 19 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p.1), 20 Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89). 21 Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37).
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The introduction of electronic toll systems will entail the processing of personal data. Such processing needs to be carried out in accordance with Union rules, as set out, inter alia, in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council19 , Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council20 and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council21 . The right to protection of personal data
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17 a) The amount and type of data which EETS providers communicate to toll chargers, for the purpose of calculating and applying tolls or to verify the calculation of applied toll on the vehicles of EETS users by the EETS providers, should be limited to a strict minimum, and EETS providers should not be required to disclose commercially sensitive information to toll chargers except in the framework of toll enforcement activities.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17 a) EETS providers should be made responsible for providing to toll chargers and/or toll operators correct data regarding their clients, as this data is essential for correct toll collection and effective enforcement.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) This Directive does not affect the Member States' freedom to lay down rules governing road infrastructure charging and taxation matters. The provisions of this directive are compatible with those of Directive XXX amending 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 a (new) (22 a) Measures to facilitate the cross- border exchange of vehicle information should include local authorities to ensure Urban Vehicle Access Regulation Schemes are enforced equally and fairly on all users. For the majority of such schemes it should remove the need for foreign registered vehicles to pre-register, treating them on the same basis as domestically registered vehicles.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 This Directive lays down the conditions necessary to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 This Directive lays down the conditions necessary to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and to facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union . It applies to the electronic collection of all types of road fees, and all unpaid road tolls including those not under the ETC system, on the entire Union road network, urban and interurban, motorways, major and minor roads, and various structures such as tunnels, bridges and ferries.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 This Directive lays down the conditions necessary to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 This Directive lays down the conditions necessary to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and to facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 This Directive lays down the conditions necessary to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and to facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees for road toll systems and for urban vehicle access regulation schemes in the Union . It applies to the electronic collection of all types of road fees, on the entire Union road network, urban and interurban, motorways, major and minor roads, and various structures such as tunnels, bridges and ferries.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 This Directive lays down the conditions necessary to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and to facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union . It applies to the electronic collection of all types of road fees, as well as the possible sanctions in the case of unpaid tolls, on the entire Union road network, urban and interurban, motorways, major and minor roads, and various structures such as tunnels, bridges and ferries.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 This Directive lays down the conditions necessary to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and to facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union . It applies to the electronic collection and missing payments of all types of road fees, including those collected manually, on the entire Union road network, urban and interurban, motorways, major and minor roads, and various structures such as tunnels, bridges and ferries.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) parking or other traffic fees.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 3. The objective of the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Union shall be achieved by means of the European Electronic Toll Service (EETS)
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point –a (new) (-a) 'toll service' means the service enabling users having one contract and one set of OBE to use a vehicle in one or more toll domains;it includes, notably: - providing a customized OBE to the users and maintaining its functionality; - guaranteeing that the toll charger is paid the toll due by the user; - providing the payment means to the user or accepting an existing one; - collecting the toll from the user; - managing the customs relations with the user; - implementing and adhering to the security and privacy policies for the toll systems;
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point –a (new) -a 'service provider' means a private entity which provides toll services to the end users, but is not the national toll service provider, nor an EETS provider.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point –a (new) -a “toll service provider” means a legal entity providing customer toll services on one or more toll domains for one or more classes of vehicles.”
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point –a a (new) (-a a) 'toll service provider' means a legal entity providing customer toll services on one or more toll domains for one or more classes of vehicles;
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) 'European Electronic Toll Service (EETS)' means the toll service
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) 'toll operator' means a private entity to whom the toll charger delegates the function of collecting road fees on behalf of and for the benefit of the toll charger;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) 'toll operator' means a private entity which organises the collection of the road fees on behalf of and for the benefit of the toll charger;
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) 'toll operator' means an entity which organises the collection of the road fees on behalf of and for the benefit of the toll charger;
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new) (b b) 'national toll service provider' means an entity providing the toll services developed and operated by the toll operator, to the end-users. It is appointed by a Member State and it is entrusted with the public service obligation to provides OBU's to all users of toll services and provide toll services the whole territory of the respective Member State.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new) (b b) 'national toll service provider’ means an entity which is appointed by a Member State, with an obligation to provide the toll services to end users of the toll service in the whole territory of the Member State;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new) (b b) 'national toll service provider’ means an entity which is appointed by a Member State, with an obligation to provide the toll services to end users of the toll service in the whole territory of the Member State;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'electronic toll domain' means a road, a road network, a structure such as a bridge or a tunnel, or ferry, where road fees are collected using, exclusively or partially, automatic detection mechanisms such as communication with on-board equipment inside the vehicle
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'electronic toll domain' means a road, a road network, a structure such as a bridge or a tunnel, or a ferry, where road fees are collected using, either exclusively or partially, automatic detection mechanisms such as communication with on-board equipment inside the vehicle or automatic number plate recognition;
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'electronic toll domain' means a road, a road network, a structure such as a bridge or a tunnel, or ferry, where road fees are collected using, exclusively or partially, automatic detection mechanisms such as communication with on-board equipment inside the vehicle
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'electronic toll domain' means a road, a road network, a structure such as a bridge
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'on-board equipment' means the complete set of hardware and software components required for providing EETS which is installed or carried on board a vehicle in order to collect, store, process and remotely receive/transmit data. Each vehicle shall have only one on-board unit, and that on-board unit may be linked to only one vehicle;
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) 'main service provider' means a toll service provider on which the toll charger puts specific obligations (such as the obligation to sign contracts with all interested users) or grants specific rights (such as specific remuneration or a guaranteed long term contract) different from the rights and obligations of other service providers;
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new) (f b) ‘interoperability constituents’ means any elementary component, group of components, subassembly or complete assembly of equipment incorporated or intended to be incorporated into EETS upon which the interoperability of the service depends directly or indirectly, including both tangible objects and intangible objects such as software;
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f c (new) (f c) ‘suitability for use’ means the ability of an interoperability constituent to achieve and maintain a specified performance when in service, integrated representatively into EETS in relation with a toll charger’s system;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f d (new) (f d) ‘toll’ means a charge or duty levied in relation with circulating a vehicle in a toll domain;
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f e (new) (f e) ‘toll context data’ means the information defined by the responsible toll charger necessary to establish the toll due for circulating a vehicle on a particular toll domain and conclude the toll transaction;
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f f (new) (f f) ‘toll declaration’ means a statement to a toll charger that confirms the presence of a vehicle in a toll domain in a format agreed between the toll service provider and the toll charger;
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f g (new) (f g) ‘vehicle classification parameters’ means the vehicle related information according to which tolls are calculated based on the toll context data;
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f h (new) (f h) 'back office' means the central electronic system used by the toll charger, a group of toll chargers who have created an interoperability hub, or by the EETS provider to collect, process and send information in the framework of electronic toll collection;
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f i (new) (f i) 'substantially modified system' means an existing electronic toll collection system that has undergone or undergoes a change which requires EETS providers to make modifications to the interoperability constituents that are in operation, such as reprogramming or retesting OBE or adapting the interfaces of their back office;
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f j (new) (f j) 'accreditation' means the process defined and managed by the toll charger, which an EETS provider must undergo before it is authorised to provide the EETS in an EETS domain;
source: 618.183
2018/02/28
LIBE
60 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) It should be confirmed that the European Electronic Toll Service (EETS) is legally provided by EETS providers, as specified in Commission Decision 2009/750/EC17
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Electronic tolling and co-operative ITS (C-ITS) applications use similar technologies and neighbouring frequency bands for short range vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication. In the future, the potential for merging electronic tolling with C-ITS in the 5.9 GHz band, currently used by C- ITS, should be explored, after a thorough assessment of the costs, benefits, technical barriers and possible solutions thereto, so that this does not constitute a barrier, especially for SMEs.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Electronic tolling and co-operative ITS (C-ITS) applications use similar technologies and neighbouring frequency bands for short range vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication. In the future, the potential for merging electronic tolling with C-ITS
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) The specific characteristics of electronic tolling systems which are today applied to light-duty vehicles should be taken into account.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) When standards relevant for the EETS are reviewed by the European
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) Problems with identifying non- resident offenders to electronic tolling systems hamper further deployment of such systems and the wider application of the 'user pays' and 'polluter pays' principles on Union roads, and there is therefore a need to find a way to identify such persons.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Member States should be required to provide the Commission information and data necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the system for exchanging information on those who fail to pay a road fee. The Commission should be required to assess the data and
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Member States should be required to provide the Commission information and data necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the system for exchanging information on those who fail to pay a road fee. The Commission should be required to assess the data and information obtained, and to propose, if necessary, amendments to the legislation. No personal data should be transmitted to the Commission.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Member States should be required to provide the Commission information and data necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the system
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The introduction of electronic toll systems
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) This Directive does not affect the
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and to legally facilitate the cross- border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the adapting to technological progress of the list of technologies which can be used for carrying out electronic toll transactions in electronic toll systems which require the installation or use of on-
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 This Directive shall apply without prejudice to the decisions taken by Member States to levy fees on particular types of vehicles, and to determine the level of those fees and the purpose for which such fees are levied, hence respecting subsidiarity.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'electronic toll domain' means a road, a road network, a structure such as a bridge or a tunnel, or ferry, where road fees are collected using, exclusively or partially,
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) ‘Member State of registration’ means the Member State
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 All new electronic toll systems which require the installation or use of on-board equipment shall, for carrying out electronic toll transactions, use one or more of the following technologies
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Existing electronic toll systems which use technologies other than those listed in
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 (2) On-board equipment which uses satellite positioning technology
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 EETS providers shall make available to users on-board equipment which is suitable for use
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 EETS providers shall make available to users on-board equipment which is suitable for use, interoperable and capable of communicating with all electronic toll systems in service in the Member States using the technologies listed in
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The on-board equipment may use its own hardware and software, use elements of other hardware and software present in the vehicle, or both. For the purpose of communicating with other hardware systems present in the vehicle, the on-board equipment may use technologies other than those listed in
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 5 5. Until 31 December 2027, EETS providers may provide users of light-duty vehicles with on-board equipment suitable for use
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. Member States shall ensure that processing of personal data that are necessary for the operation of the EETS is carried out in accordance with the Union rules protecting the freedoms and fundamental rights of individuals, including their privacy, and that, in particular, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, and of Directive
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 6 6. Member States shall ensure that processing of personal data necessary for the operation of the EETS is carried out in accordance with the Union rules protecting the freedoms and fundamental rights of individuals, including their privacy, and that, in particular, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, and of Directive
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part For the sole purpose of the investigation of the failure to pay road fees, the Member State shall grant other Member States' national contact points access to the following national vehicle registration data, with the power to conduct automated searches thereon:
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) data
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) data
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Those automated searches shall be conducted in full compliance with the procedures referred to in points 2 and 3 of Chapter 3 of the Annex to Council Decision 2008/616/JHA26 and with the requirements of Annex II to this Directive as well as in full compliance with all fundamental rights. _________________ 26 Council Decision 2008/616/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 The Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee shall use the data obtained exclusively in order to establish who is liable for the failure to pay that fee.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the exchange of information is carried out by interoperable electronic means without exchange of data involving other databases which are not used for the purposes of this Directive. Member States shall ensure that such exchange of information is conducted in a cost-efficient and secure manner. Member States shall firmly commit to ensur
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Where the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee decides to initiate such proceedings, that Member State shall, in accordance with its national law, inform validly and in due time the owner, the holder of the vehicle or the otherwise identified person suspected of failing to pay the road fee. This information shall, as applicable under national law, include the legal consequences thereof within the territory of the Member State in which there was a failure to pay a road fee under the law of that Member State.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. When sending the information letter to the owner, the holder of the vehicle or to the otherwise identified person suspected of failing to pay the road fee, the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee shall, in accordance with its law, include any relevant information, notably the nature of the failure to pay the road fee, the place, date and time of the failure to pay the road fee, the title of the texts of the national law infringed and the sanction and
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Where the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee decides to initiate follow-up proceedings in relation to the failure to pay a road fee, it shall, for the purpose of ensuring the respect of fundamental rights, send the information letter in the language of the registration document of the vehicle, if available, or in one of the official languages of the Member State of registration. In that letter the Member State shall inform the recipient about the mechanisms available to the owner of the vehicle in order to challenge the alleged offence and in particular the right of appeal and legal redress as well as the authority before which such rights may be exercised.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Without prejudice to Article 8, the national contact point may provide the toll charger affected by the failure to pay road fees the information necessary to recover the unpaid fees.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and, where the national law of the Member State in which the payment is due classifies the failure to pay a road fee as constituting a criminal offence, the national laws, regulations or administrative provisions transposing Directive (EU) 2016/680 shall apply to personal data processed under this Directive.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and the national laws, regulations or administrative provisions transposing Directive (EU) 2016/680 shall apply to personal data processed under this Directive. The processing of personal data shall be in full compliance with all fundamental rights.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall ensure that data subjects have the right for their personal data processed under this Directive
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall ensure that personal data processed under this Directive
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the processing of personal data
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall firmly commit to ensur
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall ensure that all personal data processed under this Directive are only used for the purpose of facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on failures to pay road fees, and that the data subjects have the same rights
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall firmly commit to ensur
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall ensure that all personal data processed under this Directive are only used for the sole purpose of facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on failures to pay road fees and shall not be further processed for any other purpose, and that the data subjects have the same rights to information, access, rectification, erasure and blocking, compensation and judicial redress as provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. Any person concerned shall have the right to obtain without hindrance information on which personal data recorded in the Member State of registration were transmitted to the Member State in which there was a failure to pay a road fee, including the date of the request and the competent authority of the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall, by [
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Recital -1 (new) (-1) All EU citizens have the right to liberty and security of person (Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ('the Charter')), the right to respect for private and family life (Article 7 of the Charter), the right to protection of their personal data (Article 8 of the Charter).
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 a (new) - an analysis of the impact of the application of Articles 6 and 7 of this Directive on fundamental rights, in particular the right to privacy and protection of personal data,
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 11 amending Annex
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 10 shall be conferred on the Commission for a
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point k (k) validation of the chosen technical solutions vis-à-vis the Union rules protecting the freedoms and fundamental rights of individuals, including their privacy and protection of personal data . In particular, it will be necessary to ensure compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC as well as, where applicable, Directive (EU) 2016/680;
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Annex III – paragraph 26 a (new) Data protection disclaimer: In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, you have the right to request access to and rectification or erasure of personal data or restriction of processing of your personal data or to object to the processing as well as the right to data portability. You also have the right to lodge a complaint with [name and address of the relevant supervisory authority]. [If the failure to pay a road fee is considered as a criminal offence under national law: In accordance with [name of the national law applying Directive (EU) 2016/680], you have the right to request from the controller access to and rectification or erasure of personal data and restriction of processing of your personal data. You also have the right to lodge a complaint with [name and address of the relevant supervisory authority]. ]
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Annex IV Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) It is necessary to provide for the widespread deployment of electronic toll systems in the Member States and neighbouring countries, and to have, as far as possible, reliable, user friendly, cost- efficient, interoperable systems suited to the future development of road-charging policy at Union level and to future technical developments.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The proliferation of specifications imposed by the Member States and neighbouring countries for their electronic toll systems may compromise both the smooth operation of the internal market, the principle of free movement and transport policy objectives. Such a situation is liable to lead to the proliferation of incompatible and expensive electronic boxes in the driving cabs of heavy duty vehicles, and to drivers making mistakes when using them with the result, for example, of unintentionally avoiding payment. Such a proliferation is unacceptable to users and to manufacturers of vehicles for cost, safety and legal reasons.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Artificial barriers to the operation of the internal market should be removed, while still allowing the Member States and the Union to implement a variety of road- charging policies for all types of vehicles at local, national or international level. The equipment installed in vehicles should allow such road-charging policies to be implemented in accordance with the principles of non-discrimination between the citizens of all Member States
source: 618.301
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/title |
Old
00069/2019/LEXNew
00069/2018/LEX |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31243&j=0&l=en
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2018-12-03T00:00:00New
2018-12-02T00:00:00 |
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)625142New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)625142 |
committees/0/shadows/3/name |
Old
DALUNDE JakopNew
DALUNDE Jakop G. |
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE609.385New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-CM-609385_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2887)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2887)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.481New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-615481_EN.html |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3560)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3560)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.183New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-618183_EN.html |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.760&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-616760_EN.html |
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0/title |
Old
00069/2018/LEXNew
00069/2019/LEX |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190213&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-02-13-TOC_EN.html |
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title |
Old
Joint Declaration 2018New
Joint Declaration 2018-19 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/11/docs/0/title |
Old
00069/2019/LEXNew
00069/2018/LEX |
docs/12/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0199&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0199_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0122New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0122_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/title |
Old
00069/2018/LEXNew
00069/2019/LEX |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
commission |
|
committees |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure |
|