BETA


2017/0138(CNS) Taxation: mandatory automatic exchange of information in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON MAUREL Emmanuel (icon: S&D S&D) MARTUSCIELLO Fulvio (icon: PPE PPE), RUOHONEN-LERNER Pirkko (icon: ECR ECR), WIERINCK Lieve (icon: ALDE ALDE), SCOTT CATO Molly (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), KAPPEL Barbara (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion CONT
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113, TFEU 115

Events

2018/06/05
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to improve the functioning of the internal market by discouraging the use of aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements.

CONTENT: this Directive amends Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation in order to provide for the mandatory disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements and to extend the scope of the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities to include such arrangements.

Some financial intermediaries and other tax advisory service providers appear to have actively assisted their clients in concealing capital abroad. Reporting on potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements will help to detect the risks of tax evasion at an earlier stage and to take measures to remedy deficiencies to avoid revenue losses.

Communication and automatic exchange of information : the revised Directive obliges intermediaries (e.g. tax advisors, accountants, banks, lawyers) who design or promote tax planning arrangements that have a cross-border element to provide information to tax authorities.

Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries to file information that is within their knowledge, possession or control on reportable cross-border arrangements with the competent authorities within 30 days beginning: (i) on the day after the reportable cross-border arrangement is made available for implementation; or (ii) on the day after the reportable cross-border arrangement is ready for implementation; or (iii) when the first step in the implementation of the reportable cross-border arrangement has been made, whichever occurs first.

To facilitate the work of Member States' administrations, the subsequent automatic exchange of information on such arrangements could take place every quarter .

The information received shall be exchanged automatically through a secure central directory to which all Member States shall have access. The Commission shall also have restricted access to the information exchanged.

Reporting obligation : to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and to prevent loopholes in the proposed framework of rules, the reporting obligation shall be placed upon all actors that are usually involved in designing, marketing, organising or managing the implementation of a reportable cross-border transaction or a series of such transactions, as well as those who provide assistance or advice. It shall not be ignored either that, in certain cases, the reporting obligation would not be enforceable upon an intermediary due to a legal professional privilege or where there is no intermediary because, for instance, the taxpayer designs and implements a scheme in-house.

List of ‘hallmarks’ : aggressive tax planning schemes have evolved over the years to become increasingly complex and are subject to constant modification and adjustment. Rather than defining the concept of aggressive tax planning, the Directive sets out in Annex IV a list of features (called ‘hallmarks’) of transactions that present a strong indication of tax avoidance or abuse.

Penalties : the Directive leaves it to the Member States to determine the penalties applicable in the event of infringement of national rules transposing the Directive into national law. These penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive .

Member States shall communicate to the Commission a yearly assessment of the effectiveness of the automatic exchange of information as well as the practical results achieved.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 25.6.2018.

TRANSPOSITION: no later than 31.12.2019.

APPLICATION: from 1.7.2020.

2018/05/25
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2018/05/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/04/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/03/01
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/03/01
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/03/01
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 541 votes to 33, with 61 abstentions, following the consultation procedure, a resolution on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements.

Parliament approved the Commission proposal subject to the following amendments:

Objectives of the Directive : Parliament considered that it is key not to compromise the principle of tax equality in a context where the gap between corporate tax rates in the Member States and between Member States is widening. It stated that the Directive shall aim to significantly limit the catastrophic consequences of tax evasion and tax avoidance on the public accounts and to improve the functioning of the internal market through discouraging the use of cross-border aggressive tax planning arrangements.

Members also stressed the urgency of a better exchange of information on tax avoidance arrangements, given the various easy options that the use of intellectual property rights give for the artificial transfer of profits.

Automatic and mandatory exchange of information on cross-border arrangements : the proposal obliges each Member State to take the necessary measures to ensure that intermediaries provide information to the relevant tax authorities on reported cross-border arrangements.

Members have suggested that while conducting statutory audits of statements of their clients, auditors shall be subject to identification and disclosure obligations regarding potential breaches of the audited entity or its intermediaries of the identification and disclosure obligations which the auditor has become aware. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require auditors to file information with the competent authorities on such breaches within 10 working days , beginning on the day after the publication of their audits reports.

Each Member State may, where appropriate, take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements where they are entitled to a legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, the obligation to file information on such an arrangement or series of arrangements shall be the responsibility of the taxpayer and intermediaries shall inform in writing taxpayers of this responsibility due to the privilege, keeping an acknowledgment of receipt signed by the taxpayer. The taxpayer shall report the information on the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of arrangements to the competent authorities within 10 working days.

Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries, auditors and taxpayers to file information on reportable cross-border arrangements that are active on the date of entry into force of this Directive and those that will enter into force thereafter.

Reporting formats shall be succinct and easy to use so as not to hinder concrete action against reported practices.

Commission access to information : the Commission shall be able to access relevant information so that it can monitor the proper functioning of this Directive and carry out its responsibilities under competition policies.

In order to enhance legal certainty for intermediaries and taxpayers, the Commission shall publish a list of the reported cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes, without making any reference to the intermediary or taxpayer.

Each year, Member States shall submit to the Commission a list of the cross-border arrangements that are regarded by the relevant tax authority as being compliant with this Directive.

Penalties : appropriate penalties should be imposed to prevent and suppress potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements. The exchange of information between tax authorities regarding the imposition of penalties and situations where the Member State has refrained from imposing penalties should also be automatic.

Member States shall submit to the Commission and make publicly available a list of intermediaries and taxpayers on whom penalties have been imposed under this Directive, including names, nationalities and residences.

Inclusion of a new measure : every two years, the Commission shall publish a draft update of the list of hallmarks that define aggressive tax planning to include any new or modified tax evasion and tax avoidance arrangements that will have been identified since the previous update was published and should be brought into force within four months of the publication of the draft update.

Documents
2018/01/31
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, following the consultation procedure, a report by Emmanuel MAUREL (S&D, FR) on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements.

The committee recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission proposal subject to the following amendments:

Objectives of the Directive : Members pointed out that the Directive shall aim to significantly limit the catastrophic consequences of tax evasion and tax avoidance on the public accounts and to improve the functioning of the internal market through discouraging the use of cross-border aggressive tax planning arrangements.

An amendment stressed that the automatic exchange of information between tax administrations, and ensuring coordination with financial intelligence units dealing with money-laundering and terrorist financing , are crucial in order to provide these authorities with the necessary information to enable them to take action where they observe aggressive tax practices.

Automatic and mandatory exchange of information on cross-border arrangements : the proposal obliges each Member State to take the necessary measures to ensure that intermediaries provide information to the relevant tax authorities on reported cross-border arrangements.

Members have suggested that while conducting statutory audits of statements of their clients, auditors shall be subject to identification and disclosure obligations regarding potential breaches of the audited entity or its intermediaries of the identification and disclosure obligations which the auditor has become aware. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require auditors to file information with the competent authorities on such breaches within 10 working days , beginning on the day after the publication of their audits reports.

Each Member State may, where appropriate, take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements where they are entitled to a legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, the obligation to file information on such an arrangement or series of arrangements shall be the responsibility of the taxpayer and intermediaries shall inform in writing taxpayers of this responsibility due to the privilege, keeping an acknowledgment of receipt signed by the taxpayer

The taxpayer shall report the information on the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of arrangements to the competent authorities within 10 working days.

Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to assess the tax arrangements disclosed through the exchange of information provided for by this Directive, as well as make available to their tax authorities the resources required.

Reporting formats shall be succinct and easy to use so as not to hinder concrete action against reported practices.

Commission access to information : the Commission shall be able to access relevant information so that it can monitor the proper functioning of this Directive and carry out its responsibilities under competition policies.

Lastly, in order to enhance legal certainty for intermediaries and taxpayers, the Commission shall publish a list of the reported cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes, without making any reference to the intermediary or taxpayer.

Penalties : appropriate penalties should be imposed to prevent and suppress potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements. The exchange of information between tax authorities regarding the imposition of penalties and situations where the Member State has refrained from imposing penalties should also be automatic.

Member States shall submit to the Commission and make publicly available a list of intermediaries and taxpayers on whom penalties have been imposed under this Directive, including names, nationalities and residences.

Inclusion of a new measure : every two years, the Commission shall publish a draft update of the list of hallmarks that define aggressive tax planning to include any new or modified tax evasion and tax avoidance arrangements that will have been identified since the previous update was published and should be brought into force within four months of the publication of the draft update.

Documents
2018/01/24
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/01/18
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2017/12/18
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/11/22
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/10/23
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2017/09/25
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2017/09/13
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2017/07/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2017/07/06
   EP - MAUREL Emmanuel (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2017/06/21
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2017/06/21
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2017/06/21
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to strengthen the Union's fiscal transparency framework by introducing new rules for intermediaries in tax planning.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council shall adopt the act after consultation of the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow the opinion of the European Parliament.

BACKGROUND: improving transparency, particularly through the exchange of information between tax administrations, is one of the main pillars of the Commission's strategy to combat tax avoidance and evasion .

Tax planning structures have become ever-more sophisticated. They consist of arrangements which develop across various jurisdictions and shift taxable profits towards beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer´s overall tax bill.

Recent revelations, such as the Panama Papers , have highlighted how certain intermediaries actively assist clients to evade tax, usually through complex cross-border arrangements often involving often involving a company located in a jurisdiction which is low tax or non-transparent.

Council Directive 2014/107/EU , amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation between tax authorities within the Union introduced a common reporting standard (CRS) for financial account information within the Union.

The standard that was developed within the OECD Global Forum prescribes for the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts held by non-tax residents and establishes a framework for this exchange worldwide.

The Commission considers it crucial that information which may escape from the scope of this Directive be captured through placing an obligation on intermediaries to report on potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements.

The aim is to increase transparency and access to the right information at an early stage, as this should allow the authorities to improve the speed and accuracy of their risk assessment and make timely and informed decisions on how to protect their tax revenues.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option is the use of an EU Directive (binding instrument) requiring Member States to introduce a mandatory disclosure regime on potentially aggressive tax planning regime combined with exchange of information.

CONTENT: the proposal amends Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation in order to provide for the mandatory disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements and to extend the scope of the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities to include such arrangements.

Communication and automatic exchange of information : the proposal obliges intermediaries (e.g. tax advisors, accountants, banks, lawyers) who design or promote tax planning arrangements that have a cross-border element to provide information to tax authorities.

The disclosed information shall be exchanged automatically amongst national tax authorities. In practice, the rules propose that the exchange is carried out through submitting the disclosed arrangements to a central directory which all Member States have access to. The Commission will also have limited access to the exchanged information.

Regarding the operational aspects of the mandatory automatic exchange of information, the proposed Directive refers to the mechanism introduced by Council Directive (EU) 2015/2376 , i.e. common communication network (CCN). This will serve as a common framework for the exchanges and for this purpose its scope will be enlarged.

Burden of disclosure : the obligation of disclosure concerns those persons (i.e. natural or legal persons or entities without legal personality) who are identified as intermediaries.

The obligation to report a cross-border scheme shall be borne by the taxpayer (company or individuals) using the scheme: (i) when the intermediary providing the cross-border scheme is not based in the EU, or where the intermediary is bound by professional privilege or secrecy rules; (ii) when it is developed by in-house tax consultants or lawyers.

List of hallmarks : the proposal includes a compilation of the features and elements of transactions that present a strong indication of tax avoidance or abuse. These features and elements are referred to as 'hallmarks' and it suffices that an arrangement fall within the scope of one of those to be treated as reportable to the tax authorities. Intermediaries must make this report to their tax authorities within five days of giving such an arrangement to their client.

The subsequent automatic exchange of information on these arrangements shall happen every quarter of a year.

Penalties : Member States shall lay down penalties against the violation of national rules that implement this Directive and ensure that these penalties actually apply in practice, that they are proportionate and have a dissuasive effect.

BUDGETARY IMPACT: the impact on expenditure is estimated at EUR 0.686 million over five years.

DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0016/2018 - Emmanuel Maurel - Am 43 01/03/2018 12:17:00.000 #

2018/03/01 Outcome: -: 466, +: 146, 0: 21
EL MT CY IE EE LU FI SE SI LV IT HR LT DK HU PT SK NL FR CZ AT BG BE ES RO GB DE PL
Total
16
6
6
8
4
5
13
18
7
7
45
9
10
13
16
19
11
22
60
17
17
15
20
49
28
59
83
49
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
34

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
27

Italy ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

3

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: NI NI
14

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
58

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
163

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2
3
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3
icon: PPE PPE
188

Greece PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0016/2018 - Emmanuel Maurel - Proposition de la Commission 01/03/2018 12:17:44.000 #

2018/03/01 Outcome: +: 541, 0: 61, -: 33
DE ES FR PL IT RO PT CZ BE BG NL SE HU GB FI AT DK EL SK LT HR IE LV SI CY MT LU EE
Total
84
49
61
49
44
28
19
16
20
15
21
18
16
59
13
17
13
19
11
10
9
8
7
7
6
6
5
4
icon: PPE PPE
191

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
161

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

France GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
58

Italy ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

3

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark NI

1
icon: ENF ENF
26

Poland ENF

2

Italy ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
34

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

4

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
AmendmentsDossier
105 2017/0138(CNS)
2017/12/18 ECON 105 amendments...
source: 615.388

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30677&j=0&l=en
docs/6
date
2017-09-13T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0335 title: COM(2017)0335
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/6
date
2017-09-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0335 title: COM(2017)0335
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/7
date
2017-09-25T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0335 title: COM(2017)0335
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
docs/7
date
2017-09-26T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0335 title: COM(2017)0335
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
docs/8
date
2017-10-23T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0335 title: COM(2017)0335
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/8
date
2017-10-24T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0335 title: COM(2017)0335
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
committees/0/shadows/3
name
PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.436
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-613436_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.388
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-615388_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3232)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3232)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30677&j=0&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0016_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0016_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180301&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-03-01-TOC_EN.html
events/6
date
2018-03-01T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0050_EN.html title: T8-0050/2018
summary
events/6
date
2018-03-01T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0050_EN.html title: T8-0050/2018
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0016&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0016_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0050
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0050_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: MAUREL Emmanuel date: 2017-07-06T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2017-07-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAUREL Emmanuel group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
activities
  • date: 2017-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0335/COM_COM(2017)0335_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0335 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52017PC0335:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/taxation-and-customs-union_en title: Taxation and Customs Union Commissioner: MOSCOVICI Pierre type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2017-07-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MARTUSCIELLO Fulvio group: ECR name: RUOHONEN-LERNER Pirkko group: ALDE name: WIERINCK Lieve group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios group: Verts/ALE name: SCOTT CATO Molly group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2017-07-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: MAUREL Emmanuel body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • date: 2018-01-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MARTUSCIELLO Fulvio group: ECR name: RUOHONEN-LERNER Pirkko group: ALDE name: WIERINCK Lieve group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios group: Verts/ALE name: SCOTT CATO Molly group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2017-07-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: MAUREL Emmanuel body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0016&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A8-0016/2018 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MARTUSCIELLO Fulvio group: ECR name: RUOHONEN-LERNER Pirkko group: ALDE name: WIERINCK Lieve group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios group: Verts/ALE name: SCOTT CATO Molly group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2017-07-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: MAUREL Emmanuel body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE date: 2018-01-31T00:00:00
  • date: 2018-03-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30677&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180301&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0050 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0050/2018 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2018-05-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2018-05-25T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2018-06-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
commission
  • body: EC dg: Taxation and Customs Union commissioner: MOSCOVICI Pierre
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2017-07-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAUREL Emmanuel group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ECON
date
2017-07-06T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: MAUREL Emmanuel
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
docs
  • date: 2017-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2017:0236:FIN:EN:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2017)0236 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2017-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2017:0237:FIN:FR:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2017)0237 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2017-11-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.436 title: PE613.436 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2017-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.388 title: PE615.388 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-01-18T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3232)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES3232/2017 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2018-04-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=30677&j=0&l=en title: SP(2018)178 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2017-09-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0335 title: COM(2017)0335 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
  • date: 2017-09-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0335 title: COM(2017)0335 type: Contribution body: DE_BUNDESRAT
  • date: 2017-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0335 title: COM(2017)0335 type: Contribution body: CZ_SENATE
events
  • date: 2017-06-21T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0335/COM_COM(2017)0335_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0335 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2017&nu_doc=0335 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to strengthen the Union's fiscal transparency framework by introducing new rules for intermediaries in tax planning. PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council shall adopt the act after consultation of the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow the opinion of the European Parliament. BACKGROUND: improving transparency, particularly through the exchange of information between tax administrations, is one of the main pillars of the Commission's strategy to combat tax avoidance and evasion . Tax planning structures have become ever-more sophisticated. They consist of arrangements which develop across various jurisdictions and shift taxable profits towards beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer´s overall tax bill. Recent revelations, such as the Panama Papers , have highlighted how certain intermediaries actively assist clients to evade tax, usually through complex cross-border arrangements often involving often involving a company located in a jurisdiction which is low tax or non-transparent. Council Directive 2014/107/EU , amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation between tax authorities within the Union introduced a common reporting standard (CRS) for financial account information within the Union. The standard that was developed within the OECD Global Forum prescribes for the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts held by non-tax residents and establishes a framework for this exchange worldwide. The Commission considers it crucial that information which may escape from the scope of this Directive be captured through placing an obligation on intermediaries to report on potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements. The aim is to increase transparency and access to the right information at an early stage, as this should allow the authorities to improve the speed and accuracy of their risk assessment and make timely and informed decisions on how to protect their tax revenues. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option is the use of an EU Directive (binding instrument) requiring Member States to introduce a mandatory disclosure regime on potentially aggressive tax planning regime combined with exchange of information. CONTENT: the proposal amends Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation in order to provide for the mandatory disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements and to extend the scope of the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities to include such arrangements. Communication and automatic exchange of information : the proposal obliges intermediaries (e.g. tax advisors, accountants, banks, lawyers) who design or promote tax planning arrangements that have a cross-border element to provide information to tax authorities. The disclosed information shall be exchanged automatically amongst national tax authorities. In practice, the rules propose that the exchange is carried out through submitting the disclosed arrangements to a central directory which all Member States have access to. The Commission will also have limited access to the exchanged information. Regarding the operational aspects of the mandatory automatic exchange of information, the proposed Directive refers to the mechanism introduced by Council Directive (EU) 2015/2376 , i.e. common communication network (CCN). This will serve as a common framework for the exchanges and for this purpose its scope will be enlarged. Burden of disclosure : the obligation of disclosure concerns those persons (i.e. natural or legal persons or entities without legal personality) who are identified as intermediaries. The obligation to report a cross-border scheme shall be borne by the taxpayer (company or individuals) using the scheme: (i) when the intermediary providing the cross-border scheme is not based in the EU, or where the intermediary is bound by professional privilege or secrecy rules; (ii) when it is developed by in-house tax consultants or lawyers. List of hallmarks : the proposal includes a compilation of the features and elements of transactions that present a strong indication of tax avoidance or abuse. These features and elements are referred to as 'hallmarks' and it suffices that an arrangement fall within the scope of one of those to be treated as reportable to the tax authorities. Intermediaries must make this report to their tax authorities within five days of giving such an arrangement to their client. The subsequent automatic exchange of information on these arrangements shall happen every quarter of a year. Penalties : Member States shall lay down penalties against the violation of national rules that implement this Directive and ensure that these penalties actually apply in practice, that they are proportionate and have a dissuasive effect. BUDGETARY IMPACT: the impact on expenditure is estimated at EUR 0.686 million over five years. DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
  • date: 2017-07-06T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-01-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-01-31T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0016&language=EN title: A8-0016/2018 summary: The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, following the consultation procedure, a report by Emmanuel MAUREL (S&D, FR) on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements. The committee recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission proposal subject to the following amendments: Objectives of the Directive : Members pointed out that the Directive shall aim to significantly limit the catastrophic consequences of tax evasion and tax avoidance on the public accounts and to improve the functioning of the internal market through discouraging the use of cross-border aggressive tax planning arrangements. An amendment stressed that the automatic exchange of information between tax administrations, and ensuring coordination with financial intelligence units dealing with money-laundering and terrorist financing , are crucial in order to provide these authorities with the necessary information to enable them to take action where they observe aggressive tax practices. Automatic and mandatory exchange of information on cross-border arrangements : the proposal obliges each Member State to take the necessary measures to ensure that intermediaries provide information to the relevant tax authorities on reported cross-border arrangements. Members have suggested that while conducting statutory audits of statements of their clients, auditors shall be subject to identification and disclosure obligations regarding potential breaches of the audited entity or its intermediaries of the identification and disclosure obligations which the auditor has become aware. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require auditors to file information with the competent authorities on such breaches within 10 working days , beginning on the day after the publication of their audits reports. Each Member State may, where appropriate, take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements where they are entitled to a legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, the obligation to file information on such an arrangement or series of arrangements shall be the responsibility of the taxpayer and intermediaries shall inform in writing taxpayers of this responsibility due to the privilege, keeping an acknowledgment of receipt signed by the taxpayer The taxpayer shall report the information on the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of arrangements to the competent authorities within 10 working days. Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to assess the tax arrangements disclosed through the exchange of information provided for by this Directive, as well as make available to their tax authorities the resources required. Reporting formats shall be succinct and easy to use so as not to hinder concrete action against reported practices. Commission access to information : the Commission shall be able to access relevant information so that it can monitor the proper functioning of this Directive and carry out its responsibilities under competition policies. Lastly, in order to enhance legal certainty for intermediaries and taxpayers, the Commission shall publish a list of the reported cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes, without making any reference to the intermediary or taxpayer. Penalties : appropriate penalties should be imposed to prevent and suppress potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements. The exchange of information between tax authorities regarding the imposition of penalties and situations where the Member State has refrained from imposing penalties should also be automatic. Member States shall submit to the Commission and make publicly available a list of intermediaries and taxpayers on whom penalties have been imposed under this Directive, including names, nationalities and residences. Inclusion of a new measure : every two years, the Commission shall publish a draft update of the list of hallmarks that define aggressive tax planning to include any new or modified tax evasion and tax avoidance arrangements that will have been identified since the previous update was published and should be brought into force within four months of the publication of the draft update.
  • date: 2018-03-01T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30677&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2018-03-01T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180301&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-03-01T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0050 title: T8-0050/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 541 votes to 33, with 61 abstentions, following the consultation procedure, a resolution on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements. Parliament approved the Commission proposal subject to the following amendments: Objectives of the Directive : Parliament considered that it is key not to compromise the principle of tax equality in a context where the gap between corporate tax rates in the Member States and between Member States is widening. It stated that the Directive shall aim to significantly limit the catastrophic consequences of tax evasion and tax avoidance on the public accounts and to improve the functioning of the internal market through discouraging the use of cross-border aggressive tax planning arrangements. Members also stressed the urgency of a better exchange of information on tax avoidance arrangements, given the various easy options that the use of intellectual property rights give for the artificial transfer of profits. Automatic and mandatory exchange of information on cross-border arrangements : the proposal obliges each Member State to take the necessary measures to ensure that intermediaries provide information to the relevant tax authorities on reported cross-border arrangements. Members have suggested that while conducting statutory audits of statements of their clients, auditors shall be subject to identification and disclosure obligations regarding potential breaches of the audited entity or its intermediaries of the identification and disclosure obligations which the auditor has become aware. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require auditors to file information with the competent authorities on such breaches within 10 working days , beginning on the day after the publication of their audits reports. Each Member State may, where appropriate, take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements where they are entitled to a legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, the obligation to file information on such an arrangement or series of arrangements shall be the responsibility of the taxpayer and intermediaries shall inform in writing taxpayers of this responsibility due to the privilege, keeping an acknowledgment of receipt signed by the taxpayer. The taxpayer shall report the information on the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of arrangements to the competent authorities within 10 working days. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries, auditors and taxpayers to file information on reportable cross-border arrangements that are active on the date of entry into force of this Directive and those that will enter into force thereafter. Reporting formats shall be succinct and easy to use so as not to hinder concrete action against reported practices. Commission access to information : the Commission shall be able to access relevant information so that it can monitor the proper functioning of this Directive and carry out its responsibilities under competition policies. In order to enhance legal certainty for intermediaries and taxpayers, the Commission shall publish a list of the reported cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes, without making any reference to the intermediary or taxpayer. Each year, Member States shall submit to the Commission a list of the cross-border arrangements that are regarded by the relevant tax authority as being compliant with this Directive. Penalties : appropriate penalties should be imposed to prevent and suppress potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements. The exchange of information between tax authorities regarding the imposition of penalties and situations where the Member State has refrained from imposing penalties should also be automatic. Member States shall submit to the Commission and make publicly available a list of intermediaries and taxpayers on whom penalties have been imposed under this Directive, including names, nationalities and residences. Inclusion of a new measure : every two years, the Commission shall publish a draft update of the list of hallmarks that define aggressive tax planning to include any new or modified tax evasion and tax avoidance arrangements that will have been identified since the previous update was published and should be brought into force within four months of the publication of the draft update.
  • date: 2018-05-25T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2018-05-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2018-06-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to improve the functioning of the internal market by discouraging the use of aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements. CONTENT: this Directive amends Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation in order to provide for the mandatory disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements and to extend the scope of the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities to include such arrangements. Some financial intermediaries and other tax advisory service providers appear to have actively assisted their clients in concealing capital abroad. Reporting on potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements will help to detect the risks of tax evasion at an earlier stage and to take measures to remedy deficiencies to avoid revenue losses. Communication and automatic exchange of information : the revised Directive obliges intermediaries (e.g. tax advisors, accountants, banks, lawyers) who design or promote tax planning arrangements that have a cross-border element to provide information to tax authorities. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries to file information that is within their knowledge, possession or control on reportable cross-border arrangements with the competent authorities within 30 days beginning: (i) on the day after the reportable cross-border arrangement is made available for implementation; or (ii) on the day after the reportable cross-border arrangement is ready for implementation; or (iii) when the first step in the implementation of the reportable cross-border arrangement has been made, whichever occurs first. To facilitate the work of Member States' administrations, the subsequent automatic exchange of information on such arrangements could take place every quarter . The information received shall be exchanged automatically through a secure central directory to which all Member States shall have access. The Commission shall also have restricted access to the information exchanged. Reporting obligation : to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and to prevent loopholes in the proposed framework of rules, the reporting obligation shall be placed upon all actors that are usually involved in designing, marketing, organising or managing the implementation of a reportable cross-border transaction or a series of such transactions, as well as those who provide assistance or advice. It shall not be ignored either that, in certain cases, the reporting obligation would not be enforceable upon an intermediary due to a legal professional privilege or where there is no intermediary because, for instance, the taxpayer designs and implements a scheme in-house. List of ‘hallmarks’ : aggressive tax planning schemes have evolved over the years to become increasingly complex and are subject to constant modification and adjustment. Rather than defining the concept of aggressive tax planning, the Directive sets out in Annex IV a list of features (called ‘hallmarks’) of transactions that present a strong indication of tax avoidance or abuse. Penalties : the Directive leaves it to the Member States to determine the penalties applicable in the event of infringement of national rules transposing the Directive into national law. These penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive . Member States shall communicate to the Commission a yearly assessment of the effectiveness of the automatic exchange of information as well as the practical results achieved. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 25.6.2018. TRANSPOSITION: no later than 31.12.2019. APPLICATION: from 1.7.2020. docs: title: Directive 2018/822 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32018L0822 title: OJ L 139 05.06.2018, p. 0001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2018:139:TOC title: Corrigendum to final act 32018L0822R(03) url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&model=guicheti&numdoc=32018L0822R(03) title: OJ L 031 01.02.2019, p. 0108 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2019:031:TOC
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/taxation-and-customs-union_en title: Taxation and Customs Union commissioner: MOSCOVICI Pierre
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ECON/8/10283
New
  • ECON/8/10283
procedure/final
title
Directive 2018/822
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32018L0822
procedure/instrument
Old
Directive
New
  • Directive
  • Amending Directive 2011/16/EU 2009/0004(CNS)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 2.70.01 Direct taxation
  • 2.80 Cooperation between administrations
New
2.70.01
Direct taxation
2.80
Cooperation between administrations
procedure/summary
  • Amending Directive 2011/16/EU
activities/1/committees/2/date
2017-07-12T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas
activities/2
date
2018-01-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0016&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A8-0016/2018
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
committees
date
2018-01-31T00:00:00
activities/4
date
2018-03-01T00:00:00
docs
body
EP
type
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/5
date
2018-05-25T00:00:00
body
EP
type
End of procedure in Parliament
activities/6
date
2018-05-25T00:00:00
body
EP/CSL
type
Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
activities/7
date
2018-06-05T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
committees/2/date
2017-07-12T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure completed
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios
committees/1/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios
activities/1/committees/1/date
2017-07-06T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: MAUREL Emmanuel
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1
group
S&D
name
MAUREL Emmanuel
committees/1/date
2017-07-06T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: MAUREL Emmanuel
committees/1/shadows/1
group
S&D
name
MAUREL Emmanuel
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1
group
S&D
name
MAUREL Emmanuel
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
SCOTT CATO Molly
committees/1/shadows/1
group
S&D
name
MAUREL Emmanuel
committees/1/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
SCOTT CATO Molly
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
MARTUSCIELLO Fulvio
committees/1/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
MARTUSCIELLO Fulvio
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
WIERINCK Lieve
committees/1/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
WIERINCK Lieve
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
MOSCOVICI Pierre
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
MOSCOVICI Pierre
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0
group
ECR
name
RUOHONEN-LERNER Pirkko
committees/1/shadows/0
group
ECR
name
RUOHONEN-LERNER Pirkko
activities/1/committees/2/date
2017-07-12T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas
committees/2/date
2017-07-12T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: CHRYSOGONOS Kostas
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to strengthen the Union's fiscal transparency framework by introducing new rules for intermediaries in tax planning.

    PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.

    ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council shall adopt the act after consultation of the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow the opinion of the European Parliament.

    BACKGROUND: improving transparency, particularly through the exchange of information between tax administrations, is one of the main pillars of the Commission's strategy to combat tax avoidance and evasion.

    Tax planning structures have become ever-more sophisticated. They consist of arrangements which develop across various jurisdictions and shift taxable profits towards beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer´s overall tax bill.

    Recent revelations, such as the Panama Papers, have highlighted how certain intermediaries actively assist clients to evade tax, usually through complex cross-border arrangements often involving often involving a company located in a jurisdiction which is low tax or non-transparent.

    Council Directive 2014/107/EU, amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation between tax authorities within the Union introduced a common reporting standard (CRS) for financial account information within the Union.

    The standard that was developed within the OECD Global Forum prescribes for the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts held by non-tax residents and establishes a framework for this exchange worldwide.

    The Commission considers it crucial that information which may escape from the scope of this Directive be captured through placing an obligation on intermediaries to report on potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements.

    The aim is to increase transparency and access to the right information at an early stage, as this should allow the authorities to improve the speed and accuracy of their risk assessment and make timely and informed decisions on how to protect their tax revenues.

    IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option is the use of an EU Directive (binding instrument) requiring Member States to introduce a mandatory disclosure regime on potentially aggressive tax planning regime combined with exchange of information.

    CONTENT: the proposal amends Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation in order to provide for the mandatory disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements and to extend the scope of the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities to include such arrangements.

    Communication and automatic exchange of information: the proposal obliges intermediaries (e.g. tax advisors, accountants, banks, lawyers) who design or promote tax planning arrangements that have a cross-border element to provide information to tax authorities.

    The disclosed information shall be exchanged automatically amongst national tax authorities. In practice, the rules propose that the exchange is carried out through submitting the disclosed arrangements to a central directory which all Member States have access to. The Commission will also have limited access to the exchanged information.

    Regarding the operational aspects of the mandatory automatic exchange of information, the proposed Directive refers to the mechanism introduced by Council Directive (EU) 2015/2376, i.e. common communication network (CCN). This will serve as a common framework for the exchanges and for this purpose its scope will be enlarged.

    Burden of disclosure: the obligation of disclosure concerns those persons (i.e. natural or legal persons or entities without legal personality) who are identified as intermediaries.

    The obligation to report a cross-border scheme shall be borne by the taxpayer (company or individuals) using the scheme: (i) when the intermediary providing the cross-border scheme is not based in the EU, or where the intermediary is bound by professional privilege or secrecy rules; (ii) when it is developed by in-house tax consultants or lawyers. 

    List of hallmarks: the proposal includes a compilation of the features and elements of transactions that present a strong indication of tax avoidance or abuse. These features and elements are referred to as 'hallmarks' and it suffices that an arrangement fall within the scope of one of those to be treated as reportable to the tax authorities. Intermediaries must make this report to their tax authorities within five days of giving such an arrangement to their client.

    The subsequent automatic exchange of information on these arrangements shall happen every quarter of a year.

    Penalties: Member States shall lay down penalties against the violation of national rules that implement this Directive and ensure that these penalties actually apply in practice, that they are proportionate and have a dissuasive effect.

    BUDGETARY IMPACT: the impact on expenditure is estimated at EUR 0.686 million over five years.

    DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.

activities/1/committees/1/shadows
  • group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara
committees/1/shadows
  • group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara
activities/1
date
2017-07-06T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/8/10283
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
  • date: 2017-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0335/COM_COM(2017)0335_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0335 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52017PC0335:EN body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2017/0138(CNS)
    subtype
    Legislation
    legal_basis
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    summary
    Amending Directive 2011/16/EU
    instrument
    Directive
    title
    Taxation: mandatory automatic exchange of information in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements
    type
    CNS - Consultation procedure
    subject