Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | DALTON Daniel ( ECR) | CSÁKY Pál ( PPE), HEDH Anna ( S&D), MLINAR Angelika ( ALDE), FRANZ Romeo ( Verts/ALE), MEUTHEN Jörg ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | KÖLMEL Bernd ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | CONT |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 082-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 082-p1Events
PURPOSE: to enable the rapid and efficient exchange of accurate information on criminal records of third-country nationals.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2019/816 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third-country nationals and stateless persons (ECRIS-TCN) to supplement the European Criminal Records Information System and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1726.
CONTENT: this Regulation establishes:
- a system to identify the Member States holding information on previous convictions of third-country nationals (‘ECRIS-TCN’);
- the conditions under which ECRIS-TCN shall be used by the central authorities in order to obtain information on such previous convictions through the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) as well as the conditions under which Eurojust, Europol and the EPPO shall use ECRIS-TCN.
Exchange of information on criminal records
The reformed European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) shall include a centralised database containing information on convictions of third country nationals and stateless persons (ECRIS-TCN). The Regulation defines the rules for the creation of a centralised system. It specifies the data to be recorded and sets access rights.
The Regulation shall apply to the processing of identification data of third-country nationals who have been convicted in Member States to enable the identification of Member States in which such convictions have been handed down. It shall also apply to persons with dual EU/third country nationality who have been convicted in the Member States.
Information relating to the conviction itself shall always be available only from the convicting Member State.
Data entry in ECRIS-TCN
For each convicted third-country national, the central authority of the convicting Member State shall create a data record in the central system. The convicting Member State shall create the data file automatically, if possible, and without undue delay after the conviction has been entered in the criminal record.
The alphanumeric data to be entered by Member States in the central system shall include the name (surname) and forenames of the convicted person and, where available to the central authority, any pseudonyms or aliases of that person. They shall also include, in addition, the identity number, or the type and number of the identity documents of the person concerned, as well as the name of the authority that issued these documents, where the central authority has this information.
ECRIS-TCN shall allow the processing of fingerprint data to identify Member States holding information on the criminal record of a third-country national. It shall also allow the processing of facial images in order to confirm his identity if the law of the convicting Member State allows the collection and storage of facial images of convicted persons.
The recording and use of fingerprint data and facial images should not go beyond what is strictly necessary to achieve the objective pursued. They shall respect fundamental rights, as well as the best interests of the child, and comply with applicable EU data protection rules.
Use of ECRIS-TCN
Central authorities could use ECRIS-TCN to identify Member States that hold information on the criminal record of a third-country national when the information is requested in the Member State concerned for the purpose of criminal proceedings against that person, or for one of the following purposes, if national law so provides and in accordance with it:
- a person's own criminal record check, at their request;
- security clearance;
- obtaining a licence or permit;
- investigations carried out in the context of professional recruitment and recruitment for voluntary activities involving direct and regular contact with children or vulnerable persons;
- visa, citizenship and migration procedures, including asylum procedures; and
- audits in relation to public contracts and public competitions.
The authority responsible for conducting criminal proceedings could decide that ECRIS-TCN should not be used when this would not be appropriate in the circumstances of the case, for example in the case of minor offences.
Any person would have the right to lodge a complaint and the right to bring an action in the convicting Member State which refused him/her the right of access to data concerning him/her or the right to have them rectified or deleted.
Each data record shall be stored in the central system for as long as the data related to the convictions of the person concerned are stored in the criminal records.
Management
The European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale Information Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) would be responsible for the development of ECRIS-TCN in accordance with the principle of data protection from the design stage and by default. It would also be responsible for the operational management of ECRIS-TCN.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 11.6.2019.
The European Parliament adopted by 422 votes to 130 with 16 abstentions a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a centralised system for identifying Member States holding information on convictions of third-country nationals and stateless persons, which aims to complement and support the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS-TCN system) and amending Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011.
The position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure has amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Purpose and scope
The regulation would establish a system to identify Member States holding information on previous convictions of third-country nationals (ECRIS-TCN). The new centralised database should improve the exchange of information on criminal records of third-country nationals throughout the EU and contribute to the EU's fight against cross-border crime and terrorism.
The regulation would apply to the processing of identification data of third-country nationals who have been convicted in Member States to enable the identification of Member States in which such convictions have been handed down.
The provisions would also apply to Union citizens who are also nationals of a third country and who have been convicted in the Member States since it is possible that these persons present themselves as one or more nationalities, and that different conviction decisions are kept in the convicting Member State or in the Member State of which the person concerned is a national.
Data entry in ECRIS-TCN
The convicting Member State should create the data file automatically, if possible, and without undue delay after the conviction has been entered in the criminal record.
The alphanumeric data to be entered by Member States in the central system would include the name (surname) and forenames of the convicted person and, where available to the central authority, any pseudonyms or aliases of that person. They should also include, in addition, the identity number, or the type and number of the identity documents of the person concerned, as well as the name of the authority that issued these documents, where the central authority has this information.
ECRIS-TCN would allow the processing of fingerprint data to identify Member States holding information on the criminal record of a third-country national. It would also allow the processing of facial images in order to confirm his identity if the law of the convicting Member State allows the collection and storage of facial images of convicted persons.
The recording and use of fingerprint data and facial images should not go beyond what is strictly necessary to achieve the objective pursued. They should respect fundamental rights, as well as the best interests of the child, and comply with applicable EU data protection rules.
Use of ECRIS-TCN
Central authorities could use ECRIS-TCN to identify Member States that hold information on the criminal record of a third-country national when the information is requested in the Member State concerned for the purpose of criminal proceedings against that person, or for one of the following purposes, if national law so provides and in accordance with it:
- a person's own criminal record check, at their request;
- security clearance;
- obtaining a licence or permit;
- investigations carried out in the context of professional recruitment and recruitment for voluntary activities involving direct and regular contact with children or vulnerable persons;
- visa, citizenship and migration procedures, including asylum procedures; and
- audits in relation to public contracts and public competitions.
The authority responsible for conducting criminal proceedings could decide that ECRIS-TCN should not be used when this would not be appropriate in the circumstances of the case, for example in the case of minor offences.
Any person would have the right to lodge a complaint and the right to bring an action in the convicting Member State which refused him/her the right of access to data concerning him/her or the right to have them rectified or deleted.
Use of ECRIS-TCN
Central authorities could use ECRIS-TCN to identify Member States that hold information on the criminal record of a third-country national when the information is requested in the Member State concerned for the purpose of criminal proceedings against that person, or for one of the following purposes, if national law so provides and in accordance with it:
- a person's own criminal record check, at their request;
- security clearance;
- obtaining a licence or permit;
- investigations carried out in the context of professional recruitment and recruitment for voluntary activities involving direct and regular contact with children or vulnerable persons;
- visa, citizenship and migration procedures, including asylum procedures; and
- audits in relation to public contracts and public competitions.
The authority responsible for conducting criminal proceedings could decide that ECRIS-TCN should not be used when this would not be appropriate in the circumstances of the case, for example in the case of minor offences.
Any person would have the right to lodge a complaint and the right to bring an action in the convicting Member State which refused him/her the right of access to data concerning him/her or the right to have them rectified or deleted.
The proposed new regulation also defines the conditions under which Eurojust, Europol and the European Public Prosecutor's Office use ECRIS-TCN.
The European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale Information Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) would be responsible for the development of ECRIS-TCN in accordance with the principle of data protection from the design stage and by default. It would also be responsible for the operational management of ECRIS-TCN.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Daniel DALTON (ECR, UK) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third country nationals and stateless persons (TCN) to supplement and support the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS-TCN system) and amending Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows.
Subject matter : the Regulation shall enable the rapid, efficient and accurate as possible exchange of criminal record information on third country nationals, by putting in place common Union rules and interoperable systems.
Data entry in the ECRIS-TCN system : for each convicted third country national whose data have been entered in the criminal record of the convicting Member State, the central authority of that Member State shall create a data record in the Central System.
This recording shall not contain data on the names of parents and shall only contain fingerprint data and facial images only when the national law of a Member State where a conviction is handed down allows for collection and storage of fingerprints and facial images of a convicted person.
The convicting Member State shall create the data record automatically, where possible, and in any event within 24 hours upon the conviction being entered into the national criminal records register.
The central authority of the convicting Member State shall permanently erase the individual data record automatically, where possible, from the Central System, and in any event within 24 hours after the expiry of that retention period.
The Commission shall adopt delegated acts to provide, as soon as it becomes technically possible and based on an assessment by the Commission of the availability and readiness of the required technology, that facial images may also be used to identify a third country national on th e basis of this biometric identifier.
Proportionality, fundamental rights, data protection : any introduction and use of fingerprint data and facial images must:
never exceed what is strictly necessary to achieve the aim; respect fundamental rights , including the best interests of children; be in conformity with Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties.
Third country nationals shall be able to address requests related to their rights of access to, and correction and deletion of, data to the central authority of any Member State. An amendment ensured that third-country nationals requesting a criminal records extract shall receive, if they have committed no offences, a certificate that there was no hit on ECRIS, which proves that they have no criminal records in any Member States.
Use of the results obtained in the ECRIS-TCN system : the ECRIS-TCN system only allows a competent authority to establish where criminal records information is held, and not what that information is. In order to obtain the details of what the criminal conviction actually is, the competent authority will still need to use the traditional ECRIS system to make a request to the relevant Member State.
Therefore, Members included an amendment to make it clear that a hit in the ECRIS-TCN system by itself shall not be used to affect a judicial outcome by undermining the principle of equality before the law, the right to a fair trial, the presumption of innocence or the general prohibition of discrimination.
Right of access for Eurojust, Europol and the European Public Prosecutor's Office : authorised staff of Eurojust, Europol and the European Public Prosecutor's Office shall have direct access to the ECRIS-TCN system.
Staff with a right of access to the system shall be subject to internal disciplinary measures if they make use of data from the ECRIS-TCN system in a way which does not conform with this Regulation.
Monitoring and evaluation : the report submitted by eu-LISA on the state of development of the ECRIS-TCN system shall include an overview of the current costs and progress of the project, a financial impact assessment, and information on any technical problems and risks that may impact the overall costs of the system.
In the event of delays in the development process, the European Parliament and the Council shall be informed as soon as possible.
PURPOSE: to allow the rapid and efficient exchange of information on the criminal records of third-country nationals.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the objective of providing EU citizens with an area of freedom, security and justice without internal borders presupposes exchanging information extracted from criminal records between the competent authorities of the Member States.
These exchanges of information are organised and facilitated by the rules laid down in Council Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record between Member States, a new criminal procedure and the European Criminal Records Information System ( ECRIS ) established by Council Decision 2009/316/JHA .
Although it is possible to exchange information on convictions concerning third-country nationals (TCNs) through ECRIS, there is no procedure or mechanism to do so in an efficient manner.
Information on third country nationals is not gathered within the Union in the Member State of nationality as it is for nationals of Member States, but only stored in the Member States where the convictions have been handed down. A complete overview of the criminal history of a third country national can therefore be ascertained only if such information is requested from all Member States.
Such 'blanket requests' impose an administrative burden on all Member States, including those not holding information on that third country national. In practice, this burden deters Member States from requesting information on third country nationals, and leads to Member States limiting the criminal record information to information stored in their national register.
To improve the situation, it is proposed to establish a system by which the central authority of a Member State can find out quickly and efficiently in which other Member State(s) criminal record information on a third country national is stored.
As a result of the terrorist attacks in many European cities, exchange of information on criminal records is crucial to combat cross-border crime. The initiative follows the requests of the European Council and the Justice and Home Affairs Council to improve the existing ECRIS. It also reflects the Commission's new approach to the management of data for borders and security.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the creation of a centralised ECRIS-TCN system containing both alphanumeric data and fingerprints is the preferred solution. It would be the most cost efficient, and technically less complex and easier to maintain compared to the others. This option also offers the additional advantages of making the ECRIS-TCN system suitable for participating in a future shared biometric matching service and a common identity repository, facilitating direct access for Eurojust, Europol, [and the European Public Prosecutor's Office] and creating a central contact point at Eurojust for third States requiring information on convicted TCN.
If Member States were to systematically send ‘blanket’ requests, the administrative burden in responding to them has been identified as the most costly element (estimated up to EUR 78 million) of the ECRIS-workflow; the proposed solution saves such costs.
CONTENT: this proposal supplements the Commission's 2016 proposal for a Directive to amend the ECRIS Framework Decision and to repeal the ECRIS Council Decision:
creating a centralised system to efficiently identify which Member State(s) hold conviction information on TCN; establishing rules under which the ECRIS-TCN system is used by competent authorities to obtain information on such previous convictions through the European Criminal Records Information System.
The proposed hit/no hit search system, based on alphanumeric data and fingerprints of TCN convicted in the Member States, will allow Member States to quickly identify other Member State(s) having convicted a particular TCN.
The requesting Member State should then request those identified Member States to provide the actual conviction information through the existing ECRIS system as improved by January 2016 proposal.
As soon as this becomes technically possible, facial images may also be used to identify a third country national on the basis of this biometric identifier
The proposal sets an obligation for the convicting Member State:
to create a data record in the Central ECRIS-TCN System for each convicted TCN as soon as possible after the conviction was entered into the national criminal records register; to create records in the ECRIS-TCN system of 'historical' convictions of third country nationals, i.e. convictions handed down prior to the entry into force of the Regulation.
Member States would be required to use the ECRIS-TCN system in all cases where they receive a request for information on previous convictions of third country nationals in accordance with national law, and to follow up on any hits with the Member States identified through the ECRIS system. They would also be required to verify the accuracy of the data sent to the Central System and to correct them, as well as to amend the data sent to the Central System in case of any subsequent amendment in national criminal records.
The proposal entrusts eu-LISA with the task of developing and operationally managing the ECRIS-TCN system. It nominates Eurojust as the contact point for third countries and international organisations which wish to request conviction information on a TCN.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the impact on the EU and national budgets would be as follows: (i) one-off costs for the EU of around EUR 13 002 000; (ii) for the Member States approximately EUR 13 344 000 (a total of approximately EUR 26 346 000). Total on-going costs are expected to increase gradually over the years, starting at EUR 8 220 000 and increasing up to a maximum of EUR 17 520 000.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2019/816
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 135 22.05.2019, p. 0001
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)393
- Draft final act: 00088/2018/LEX
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0149/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE632.976
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2019)000581
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE632.976
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)000581
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0018/2018
- Committee opinion: PE612.106
- Document attached to the procedure: N8-0051/2018
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 055 14.02.2018, p. 0004
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE615.287
- Committee draft report: PE612.310
- Contribution: COM(2017)0344
- Contribution: COM(2017)0344
- Contribution: COM(2017)0344
- Contribution: COM(2017)0344
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0248
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2017)0344
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0248
- Committee draft report: PE612.310
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE615.287
- Document attached to the procedure: N8-0051/2018 OJ C 055 14.02.2018, p. 0004
- Committee opinion: PE612.106
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)000581
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE632.976
- Draft final act: 00088/2018/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)393
- Contribution: COM(2017)0344
- Contribution: COM(2017)0344
- Contribution: COM(2017)0344
- Contribution: COM(2017)0344
Activities
Votes
A8-0018/2018 - Daniel Dalton - Décision d'engager des négociations interinstitutionnelles 08/02/2018 12:13:38.000 #
A8-0018/2018 - Daniel Dalton - Vote 12/03/2019 12:43:53.000 #
CY | EL | IE | SE | EE | LU | SI | MT | DK | NL | FI | LV | CZ | HR | SK | LT | HU | BE | AT | ES | PT | BG | FR | RO | IT | PL | DE | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
6
|
13
|
9
|
19
|
6
|
6
|
8
|
6
|
13
|
24
|
13
|
8
|
19
|
11
|
12
|
10
|
12
|
18
|
17
|
49
|
21
|
17
|
65
|
26
|
59
|
45
|
86
|
65
|
|
GUE/NGL |
43
|
2
|
Greece GUE/NGL |
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
France GUE/NGLFor (5) |
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
49
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (1) |
France Verts/ALEFor (2)Against (4) |
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (8)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (3)Against (3) |
||||||||||
ENF |
32
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
France ENFFor (7)Against (6)Abstain (1) |
Italy ENFFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ENFAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
13
|
Greece NIFor (1)Against (3) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
36
|
1
|
1
|
France EFDDAbstain (1) |
Italy EFDDAgainst (13)Abstain (1) |
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (2)Against (10)Abstain (2) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
68
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Poland ECRAgainst (17) |
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (17) |
||||||||||
ALDE |
65
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (7) |
4
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
Spain ALDEFor (1)Against (7) |
1
|
4
|
France ALDEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
3
|
4
|
1
|
|||||||
S&D |
169
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
Sweden S&DFor (4)Against (2) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (8) |
4
|
France S&DAgainst (8) |
Romania S&DAgainst (11) |
Italy S&DFor (5)Against (20)
Andrea COZZOLINO,
Brando BENIFEI,
Cécile Kashetu KYENGE,
Damiano ZOFFOLI,
Daniele VIOTTI,
David Maria SASSOLI,
Elena GENTILE,
Elly SCHLEIN,
Giuseppe FERRANDINO,
Luigi MORGANO,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Michela GIUFFRIDA,
Nicola CAPUTO,
Nicola DANTI,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pina PICIERNO,
Renata BRIANO,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI,
Simona BONAFÈ
Abstain (1) |
Poland S&DFor (1) |
Germany S&DAgainst (19)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom S&DAgainst (17)Abstain (1) |
|
PPE |
188
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
Sweden PPE |
1
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
Netherlands PPE |
3
|
4
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
5
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
3
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (6) |
3
|
5
|
Spain PPEAgainst (17)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Pilar AYUSO,
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (8) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (7) |
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Renaud MUSELIER,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
11
|
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Julia PITERA,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN
|
Germany PPEAgainst (30)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
2
|
A8-0018/2018 - Daniel Dalton - Am 104 12/03/2019 12:44:09.000 #
IT | PL | FR | ES | RO | CZ | BE | DE | SK | BG | HU | LT | AT | LU | HR | LV | SI | MT | CY | PT | EE | DK | IE | FI | NL | SE | GB | EL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
59
|
45
|
65
|
49
|
27
|
19
|
18
|
87
|
12
|
17
|
13
|
10
|
17
|
6
|
11
|
8
|
8
|
6
|
6
|
21
|
6
|
13
|
9
|
13
|
26
|
18
|
63
|
13
|
|
PPE |
189
|
8
|
Poland PPEFor (19)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogusław SONIK, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Julia PITERA, Krzysztof HETMAN, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN
|
France PPEFor (18)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
|
Spain PPEFor (17)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, Gabriel MATO, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Pilar AYUSO, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
Romania PPEFor (10)Against (1) |
Czechia PPEFor (6) |
3
|
Germany PPEFor (29)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hermann WINKLER, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Stefan GEHROLD, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN, Werner LANGEN
Against (1) |
Slovakia PPE |
Bulgaria PPEFor (7) |
Hungary PPE |
3
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
Portugal PPEFor (8) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
Netherlands PPEFor (5) |
4
|
2
|
1
|
ECR |
66
|
3
|
Poland ECRFor (17) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
Germany ECRFor (6) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (16) |
1
|
||||||||||
S&D |
169
|
Italy S&DFor (18)Against (3) |
Poland S&D |
France S&DFor (1)Against (1) |
Romania S&DFor (9)Abstain (3) |
4
|
3
|
Germany S&DAgainst (3)Abstain (21)
Arndt KOHN,
Arne LIETZ,
Babette WINTER,
Bernd LANGE,
Constanze KREHL,
Dietmar KÖSTER,
Evelyne GEBHARDT,
Gabriele PREUSS,
Iris HOFFMANN,
Jens GEIER,
Jo LEINEN,
Knut FLECKENSTEIN,
Maria NOICHL,
Martina WERNER,
Michael DETJEN,
Norbert NEUSER,
Peter SIMON,
Susanne MELIOR,
Tiemo WÖLKEN,
Udo BULLMANN,
Ulrike RODUST
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
Austria S&DAgainst (1)Abstain (3) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (1) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Sweden S&DAgainst (1)Abstain (5) |
United Kingdom S&D |
3
|
|
ENF |
32
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
37
|
Italy EFDDFor (13)Abstain (1) |
1
|
France EFDDFor (3)Against (2) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
14
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
Greece NI |
||||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
65
|
France ALDE |
Spain ALDEFor (6)Against (2) |
3
|
4
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (1) |
4
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
Netherlands ALDE |
3
|
1
|
|||||||
GUE/NGL |
43
|
2
|
France GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
Spain GUE/NGLAgainst (7) |
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (7) |
2
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
50
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (6) |
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
2
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (13) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEAgainst (6) |
Amendments | Dossier |
280 |
2017/0144(COD)
2017/11/15
BUDG
7 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 4 4. Two years after the start of operations of the ECRIS-TCN system and every year thereafter, eu-LISA shall submit to the Commission a report on the technical functioning of the ECRIS-TCN system and the ECRIS reference implementation, including their security
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 5 Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 1. The costs incurred in connection with the establishment and operation of the Central System, the Communication Infrastructure, the Interface Software and the ECRIS reference implementation shall be borne by the general budget of the Union. Annual appropriations shall be authorised by the European Parliament and the Council within the framework of the budget negotiations.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 3 3. By [six months after the entry into force of this Regulation] and every six months thereafter during the development phase, eu-LISA shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the state of play of the development of the ECRIS-TCN system.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In the event of delays in the development process, the European Parliament and the Council shall be informed as soon as possible of the reasons for the delays and on their impact in terms of time and finances.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. As soon as the development is completed, a report shall be sent to the European Parliament and the Council describing the development of the project and any discrepancies at each of the phases and milestones of the project, and a conclusive assessment of the costs incurred and the technical specifications of the system.
Amendment 9 #
3c. In the event of an upgrade of the system, a report shall be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council, and the costs of the upgrade shall be published accordingly.
source: 612.148
2017/11/30
LIBE
273 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation establishes strict access rules to the ECRIS-TCN system and the necessary safeguards, including the responsibility of the Member States in collecting and using the data. It also sets out
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 should apply to the processing of personal data by competent national authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should apply to the processing of personal data by national authorities provided that national provisions transposing Directive (EU) 2016/680 do not apply. Coordinated supervision should be ensured in accordance with Article 62 of [the new data protection regulation for Union institutions and bodies]. [The new data protection regulation for Union institutions and bodies] should apply to the processing of personal data by eu- LISA. _________________ 26 Directive (EU 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA (OJ L
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 should apply to the processing of personal data by competent national authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should apply to the processing of personal data by national authorities
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 should apply to the processing of personal data by competent national authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should apply to the processing of personal data by national authorities
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) Rules on the liability of the Member States in respect to damage arising from any breach of this Regulation
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) Rules on the liability of the Member States and Union agencies making use of the ECRIS-TCN system in respect to damage arising from any breach of this Regulation should be laid down .
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) (24a) eu-LISA should provide regular statistics on the recording, storage and exchange of information extracted from criminal records through the ECRIS-TCN system, including through the use of statistics provided by Member States on the number of convicted third country nationals. However, these statistics should take into account the statistical bias stemming from the use of unrepresentative samples of the population, in this case third country nationals, and not draw any conclusions in comparative analyses.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) (24a) Since using the ECRIS-TCN system involves submitting a specific request for information on possible convictions in a Member State, the Commission should, when reviewing this Regulation, assess the possibility and opportunity of creating a European criminal record, from which third-country nationals and Member State nationals would be able to obtain an extract on request.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25)
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to enable the rapid
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the establishment and operational management of the ECRIS- TCN system, implementing and delegated powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Since the United Kingdom notified on 29 March 2017 its intention to leave the Union, pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties will cease to apply to the United Kingdom from the date of the entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification, unless the European Council, in agreement with the United Kingdom, decides to extend that period. As a consequence, and without prejudice to any provisions of the withdrawal agreement, this above- mentioned description of the participation of the UK in proposal
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) establishes
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) lays down the conditions under which the ECRIS-TCN system
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 This Regulation applies to the processing of identity information of third country nationals who have been subject to
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) The provisions of this Regulation that apply to third country nationals shall also apply to citizens of the Union within the meaning of Article 20(1) TFEU who hold the nationality of a third country and who have been subject to final decisions against them of criminal courts in the Member States .
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) 'criminal record' means the information stored in the national register or registers re
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'central national authority' means the national authority(ies) designated
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) 'third country national' means a
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) 'third country national' means a national of a country other than a Member State
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) 'third country national' means a national of a country other than a Member
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) 'third country national' means a national of a country other than a Member State
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l (l) 'fingerprint data' means the data relating to plain and rolled impressions of
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l (l) 'fingerprint data' means the data relating to plain and rolled impressions of the fingerprints
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) a Central System where identity information on convicted third country nationals is stored and shared;
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The Interface Software shall be integrated with the ECRIS reference implementation. The Member States
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 2 – title Entry and use of data by central national authorities
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. For each convicted third country national,
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) surname (family name); first name(s) (given names); date of birth; place of birth (town and country); nationality or nationalities; gender;
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) surname (family name); first name(s) (given names); date of birth; place of birth (town and country); nationality or nationalities; gender;
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) surname (family name); first name(s) (given names); date of birth; place of birth (town and country); nationality or nationalities; gender;
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) fingerprint data, only when the national law of a Member State where a conviction is handed down allows for collection and storage of fingerprints of a convicted person, and in accordance with Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA31 and with the specifications for the resolution and use of fingerprints referred to in point (b) of Article 10(1); the reference number
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) fingerprint data in accordance with Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA31, only when the national law of the convicting Member State allows for collection and storage of fingerprints of a convicted person, and with the specifications for the resolution and use of fingerprints referred to in point (b) of Article 10(1); the reference number of the fingerprint data of the convicted person including the code of the convicting Member State. _________________ 31 As amended by Directive of the
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The convicting Member State shall systematically create the data record
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The convicting Member State
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The convicting Member State shall create the data record
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 4. The convicting Member States shall, within no more than one month of the ECRIS-TCN system coming online, create data records also for convictions handed down prior to [date of entry into force of this Regulation] to the extent that such data are stored in its national criminal records or national fingerprints database.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 4. The convicting Member States
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Whenever a Member State obtains, in the course of a criminal proceeding, information on convictions linked to terrorist offences as set out in Articles 3 to 12 of Directive (EU) 2017/541 or to serious crime as defined in Article 2.2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JAI which have been handed down to third-country nationals by a judicial authority of a third country with which Eurojust has signed a judicial cooperation agreement, that Member State may create a record in the ECRIS- TCN system.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 157 #
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Facial images as referred to in Article 5(2)
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. As soon as this becomes technically possible, facial images may also be used to identify a third country national on the basis of this biometric identifier.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. As soon as this becomes technically possible, facial images
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. When criminal records information on a third country national is requested in a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings against that third country national
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. When criminal records information on a third country national is requested in a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings against that third country national
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. When criminal records information on a third country national is requested in a Member State for the purposes of criminal proceedings against that third country national or for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings in accordance with its national law, the central national authority of that Member State
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States authorities shall have access to the ECRIS-TCN system also for the following purposes, where provided for in their national law: (a) the prevention, detection, investigation of criminal offences; (b) security clearances; (c) employment in professions with sensitive tasks; (d) requests for information of the concerned person on his or her own criminal record; (e) licences for firearms or other hazardous materials; (f) the issuing of residence permits; (g) visa procedures; (h) naturalisation procedures; (i) adoption of children; (j) choice of foster care parents. Member States shall use the ECRIS-TCN system through their central authority to identify the Member State(s) holding criminal record information on that third county national in order to obtain information on previous convictions through ECRIS.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 Amendment 177 #
4.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Upon expiry of the retention period referred to in paragraph 1, the central authority of the convicting Member State shall erase the individual data record
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Upon expiry of the retention period referred to in paragraph 1, the central national authority of the convicting Member State
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Upon expiry of the retention period referred to in paragraph 1, the central authority of the convicting Member State shall immediately and permanently erase the individual data record without delay from the Central System
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Upon expiry of the retention period referred to in paragraph 1, the central authority of the convicting Member State
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Upon expiry of the retention period referred to in paragraph 1, the central authority of the convicting Member State shall erase the individual data record without delay from the Central System, and in any event no later than
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Upon expiry of the retention period referred to in paragraph 1, the central authority of the convicting Member State shall
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Any subsequent amendment in the national criminal records of the information which led to the creation of a data record in accordance with Article 5
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. If a Member State has reason to believe that the data it has recorded in the Central System are inaccurate or that data were processed in the Central System in contravention of this Regulation, it shall check the data concerned and, if necessary, immediately amend them or delete them from the Central System
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. If a Member State has reason to believe that the data it has recorded in the Central System are inaccurate or that data were processed in the Central System in contravention of this Regulation, it
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. If a Member State has reason to believe that the data it has recorded in the Central System are inaccurate or that data were processed in the Central System in contravention of this Regulation, it shall check the data concerned and, if necessary, amend them or delete them from the Central System
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. If a Member State other than the Member State which entered the data has reason to believe that data recorded in the
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. If a Member State other than the Member State which entered the data has reason to believe that data recorded in the Central System are inaccurate or that data was processed in the Central System in contravention of this Regulation, it shall
Amendment 191 #
4. If a Member State other than the Member State which entered the data has reason to believe that data recorded in the Central System are inaccurate or that data was processed in the Central System in contravention of this Regulation, it shall contact the central authority of the convicting Member State without delay. The convicting Member State shall check the accuracy of the data and the lawfulness of its processing within one
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. If a Member State other than the Member State which entered the data has reason to believe that data recorded in the Central System are inaccurate or that data was processed in the Central System in contravention of this Regulation, it
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall adopt, before [two years after the entry into force of this Regulation], the acts necessary for the development and technical implementation of the ECRIS-
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the technical specifications for data quality, including a mechanism and procedures to carry out data quality checks;
Amendment 200 #
(e) the technical specifications for data quality, including a mechanism and procedures to carry out data quality checks;
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) data quality, including a mechanism and procedures to carry out data quality and accuracy checks;
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point h Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point h Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i Amendment 209 #
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point j Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point k Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 a (new) Article 10a Adoption of delegated acts by the Commission The Commission shall adopt the delegated acts in accordance with Article 35a concerning the development and technical implementation of the ECRIS- TCN system, and in particular rules on: (a) entering the data in accordance with Article 5; (b) accessing the data in accordance with Article 7; (c) amending and deleting the data in accordance with Articles 8 and 9; (d) keeping and accessing the logs in accordance with Article 29; (e) providing statistics in accordance with Article 30; (f) performance and availability requirements of the ECRIS-TCN system.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 a (new) Article 10a Adoption of delegated acts by the Commission The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 35a concerning: (a) entering the data in accordance with Article 5; (b) accessing the data in accordance with Article 7; (c) amending and deleting the data in accordance with Articles 8 and 9; (d) keeping and accessing the logs in accordance with Article 29;
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. eu-LISA shall be responsible for the development
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. eu-LISA shall define the design of the physical architecture of the ECRIS- TCN system including its technical specifications and their evolution as regards the Central System referred to in point (a) of Article 4(1), the national central access point referred to in point (b)
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. eu-LISA shall develop and implement the ECRIS-TCN system before [two years after the entry into force of this Regulation]
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. eu-LISA shall develop and implement the ECRIS-TCN system
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 5. Prior to the design and development phase, a Programme Management Board composed of a maximum of ten members shall be established by the Management Board of eu-LISA. It shall be composed of
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 5. Prior to the design and development phase, a Programme Management Board composed of a maximum of ten members shall be established by the Management Board of eu-LISA. It shall be composed of
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 5. Prior to the design and development phase, a Programme Management Board composed of a maximum of ten members shall be established by the Management Board of eu-LISA. . It shall be composed of eight representatives appointed by the Management Board, the Chair of the ECRIS-TCN system Advisory Group referred to in Article 36 and one member appointed by the Commission. The
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 5. Prior to the design and development phase, a Programme Management Board composed of a maximum of ten members shall be established by the Management Board of eu-LISA. It shall be composed of
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 6 Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 7 Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 7 7. The chairmanship shall be held by
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 8 Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 9 9. During the design and development phase, the ECRIS-TCN system Advisory Group referred to in Article 36 shall be composed of the national ECRIS-TCN system project managers and chaired by eu-LISA. During the design and development phase it shall meet at least once a month until the start of operations of the ECRIS-TCN system. It shall report after each meeting to the Management Board of eu-LISA. It shall
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 9 9. During the design and development phase, the ECRIS-TCN system Advisory Group referred to in Article 36 shall be composed of the national ECRIS-TCN system project managers and chaired by eu-LISA. During the design and development phase it shall meet at least once a month until the start of operations of the ECRIS-TCN system. It shall report after each meeting to the Management Board of eu-LISA. It shall provide the technical expertise to support the tasks of the Management Board and shall follow-up on the state of preparation of the Member States.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 11 Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 12 Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 15 Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. Each Member State shall give the staff of its authorities which have a right to access the ECRIS-TCN system appropriate training on the use of ECRIS-TCN system, in particular on data security and data protection rules and on relevant fundamental rights, before authorising them to process data stored in the Central System.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. Each Member State shall give the staff of its authorities, which have a right to access the ECRIS-TCN system, appropriate training, in particular on data security and data protection rules and on relevant fundamental rights, before authorising them to process data stored in the Central System.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. Each Member State shall give the staff of its authorities which have a right to access the ECRIS-TCN system appropriate training, in particular on data security and data protection rules and on
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In accordance with
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the data are collected lawfully and fully respect the human dignity and fundamental rights of the third
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the data are collected lawfully and fully respect the
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. eu-LISA shall ensure that the ECRIS-TCN system is operated in accordance with this Regulation
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. Third countries and international organisations may address their requests for information on previous convictions of third country nationals to Eurojust for the same purposes as for which Member States' authorities have access to ECRIS- TCN system pursuant to points 1 and 1a of Article 7.
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 2. When Eurojust receives a request as referred to in paragraph 1, it shall use the ECRIS-TCN system to determine which Member State(s) hold information on the third country national concerned, and shall, in cases where Member State(s) are identified, transmit the request immediately to the central authorities of those Member State(s). The Member States concerned shall be responsible for further dealing with such requests in accordance with their national law.
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 3. Neither Eurojust, Europol, [the European Public Prosecutor's Office] nor any central authority of a Member State
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 3. Neither Eurojust,
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – title Access for Eurojust
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Eurojust shall have direct access to the ECRIS-TCN system for the purpose of the implementation of Article 14, as well as for the purpose of the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of criminal offences when fulfilling its statutory tasks.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Authorised staff of Eurojust shall have direct access to the ECRIS-TCN system for the purpose of the implementation of Article 14, as well as for fulfilling its statutory tasks.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. Europol [and the European Public Prosecutor's Office] shall have direct access to the ECRIS-TCN system for the purpose of the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of criminal offences when fulfilling their statutory tasks.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. Authorised staff of Europol [and of the European Public Prosecutor's Office] shall have direct access to the ECRIS-TCN system for the purpose of fulfilling their statutory tasks.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Following a hit indicating the Member State(s) holding criminal records information on a third country national, Eurojust, Europol[, and the European Public Prosecutor's Office] may use their contacts with the national authorities of those Member States established in accordance with their respective constituting legal instruments to request the conviction information. The European Public Prosecutor's Office shall not be refused access to such conviction information on the mere ground that the refusing Member State is not part of the enhanced cooperation procedure establishing the European Public Prosecutor's Office.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Following a hit indicating the Member State(s) holding criminal records information on a third country national, Eurojust,
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – title Responsibilities of Eurojust,
Amendment 257 #
Responsibilities of Eurojust
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Eurojust
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Eurojust,
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 2. The bodies referred to in paragraph 1 shall give their staff who have a right to access the ECRIS-TCN system appropriate training, in particular on data security and data protection rules and on
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. The bodies referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure that the personal data processed and stored by them under this Regulation is protected in accordance with the applicable data protection provisions.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) verify and ensure that persons authorised to access the ECRIS-TCN system have access only to the data covered by their access
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point g (g) ensure that all authorities with a right of access to the ECRIS-TCN system create profiles describing the functions and responsibilities of persons who are authorised to enter, amend, delete, consult and search the data and make their profiles available to the national supervisory authorities referred to in Article 25
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point g (g) ensure that all authorities with a right of access to the ECRIS-TCN system create profiles describing the functions and responsibilities of persons who are authorised to enter, amend, delete, consult and search the data and make their profiles available to the national supervisory authorities referred to in Article 25
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point k (k) monitor the effectiveness of the security measures referred to in this paragraph and take the necessary organisational measures related to internal monitoring and supervision to ensure compliance with this Regulation.
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that each central authority takes the measures necessary to comply with this Regulation and cooperates
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that any use of data entered in the ECRIS-TCN system in contravention of this Regulation is punishable by penalties in accordance with national law, Article 84 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 57 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 a (new) Europol, Eurojust [and the European Public Prosecutor's Office] shall take the necessary measures to ensure that members of their staff authorised to access the ECRIS-TCN system are subjected to disciplinary measures by the Agency [or the Court] if they make use of data from the ECRIS-TCN system in a way which does not conform with this regulation.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 1. Each central authority of the Member State is to be considered as controller in accordance with
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 2. eu-LISA shall be considered as data processor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001/EU [or its successor] as regards the personal data entered into the Central System by the Member States.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Access to the ECRIS-TCN system for entering, amending, deleting and consulting the data referred to in Article 5
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Access to the ECRIS-TCN system for entering, amending, deleting and consulting the data referred to in Article 5 shall be reserved exclusively to duly authorised staff of the central authorities, and to duly authorised staff of the bodies referred to in Article 15 for consulting the data. That access shall be limited to the extent needed for the performance of the tasks in accordance with the purpose referred to in paragraph 1,
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. If a request is made to a Member State other than the convicting Member State, the authorities of the Member State to which the request has been made shall c
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. If a request is made to a Member State other than the convicting Member State, the authorities of the Member State to which the request has been made shall check the accuracy of the data and the lawfulness of the data processing in the ECRIS-TCN system with
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. If a request is made to a Member State other than the convicting Member State, the authorities of the Member State to which the request has been made shall check the accuracy of the data and the lawfulness of the data processing in the ECRIS-TCN system within a time limit of one month if that check can be done without consulting the convicting Member State. Otherwise, the Member State other than the convicting Member State shall contact the authorities of the convicting Member State within 14 days and the convicting Member State shall check the accuracy of the data and the lawfulness of the data processing and respond within one month from the contact.
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. If a request is made to a Member State other than the convicting Member State, the authorities of the Member State
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 3 3. In the event that data recorded in the ECRIS-TCN system are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the convicting Member State shall correct or delete the data in accordance with Article 9. The convicting Member State
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 3 3. In the event that data recorded in the ECRIS-TCN system are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the convicting Member State shall correct or delete the data in accordance with Article 9. The convicting Member State or, where applicable, the Member State to which the request has been made shall immediately confirm in writing to the person concerned
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 4 4. If the Member State to which the request has been made does not agree that data recorded in the ECRIS-TCN system are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, that Member State shall adopt an administrative decision explaining in writing to the person concerned without delay why it is not prepared to correct or delete data relating to him or her. Such cases shall be communicated to the European Data Protection Supervisor and the national supervisory authority for data protection.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 4 4. If the convicting Member Stat
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 7 7. Whenever a person requests data relating to him- or herself in accordance with paragraph 2, the central authority shall keep a record in the form of a written document that such a request was made and how it was addressed and by which authority and shall make that document available to the supervisory authorities without delay.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. In each Member State, the supervisory authority shall
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 1. In accordance with Chapter VIII of Directive (EU) 2016/680, in each Member State any person shall have the right to bring an action
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 1. In each Member State any person shall have the right to an effective remedy and, in this respect, the right to bring an action or a complaint in the Member State which refused the right of access to or the right of correction or deletion of data relating to him or her, provided for in Article 23.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall ensure that the supervisory authority or authorities designated pursuant to Article
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The supervisory authority shall ensure that an audit of the data processing operations in the national criminal records and fingerprints databases is carried out in
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The supervisory authority shall ensure that an audit of the data processing operations in the national criminal records and fingerprints databases is carried out in accordance with relevant international auditing standards a
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 4. Each Member State shall supply any information requested by the supervisory authorities and shall, in particular, provide them with information on the activities carried out in accordance with Articles 12, 13 and 17. Each Member State shall grant the supervisory authorities access to their records pursuant to Articles 23(7) and 29 and allow them access at all times to all their ECRIS-TCN system related premises.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 2. The European Data Protection Supervisor shall ensure that an audit of the Agency's personal data processing activities is carried out in accordance with relevant international auditing standards at least every
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 Coordinated supervision sh
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 4 4. Logs and documentation shall be used only for monitoring the lawfulness of data processing and for ensuring data integrity and security. Only logs containing non-personal data may be used for the monitoring and evaluation referred to in Article 34. Those logs shall be protected by appropriate measures against unauthorised access and deleted after
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Logs shall be deleted two years after their creation. They may be kept longer if they are required for monitoring procedures that are already under way.
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 1. The duly authorised staff of eu- LISA
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 5 Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 2. The costs of connection of Eurojust
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 2. The costs of connection of Eurojust
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 3 Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 The Member States shall notify eu-LISA of their central authorities which have access to enter, amend, delete consult or search data. eu-LISA shall
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 The Member States shall notify eu-LISA of their central authorities which have access to enter, amend, delete consult or search data. eu-LISA shall regularly publish a list of these central authorities on its website.
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the measures referred to in Articles 10 and 10a have been adopted;
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 4 4. Two years after the start of operations of the ECRIS-TCN system and every second year thereafter, eu-LISA shall submit to the Commission a report on the technical functioning of the ECRIS- TCN system and the ECRIS reference implementation, including the security thereof, based in particular on the statistics on the functioning and use of ECRIS-TCN system and on the exchange, through the ECRIS reference implementation, of information extracted from the criminal records
Amendment 312 #
5.
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 5 5. Three years after the start of operations of the ECRIS-TCN system and
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 5 5. T
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 6 6. The Member States, Eurojust, Europol[, and the European Public Prosecutor's Office], the European Data Protection Supervisor and the national supervisory authorities for data protection shall provide eu-LISA and the Commission with the information necessary to draft the reports referred to in this Article according to the quantitative indicators predefined by the Commission or eu-LISA or both. That information shall not jeopardise working methods or include information that reveals sources, staff members or investigations of the designated authorities.
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 7 7. eu-LISA shall provide the Commission with the information necessary to produce the overall
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 a (new) Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 a (new) Article 35a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt the delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 10a shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from ... [the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 10a may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 10a shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 An Advisory Group, including a representative of the European Data Protection Supervisor and a representative of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights shall be established by eu-LISA and provide it with the expertise related to the ECRIS-TCN system and the ECRIS reference implementation, in
Amendment 47 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The Union has set itself the objective of offering
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The Union has set itself the objective of offering its citizens an area of freedom, security and justice without internal frontiers, in which the free movement of persons is ensured, in conjunction with appropriate measures to prevent and combat crime and terrorism.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) This objective requires that information on convictions handed down in the Member States be taken into account outside the convicting Member State,
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) This objective
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) This objective
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The ECRIS legal framework, however, does not sufficiently cover the particularities of requests concerning third country nationals. Although it is now possible to exchange information on third country nationals through ECRIS, there is no procedure or mechanism
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The ECRIS legal framework, however, does not sufficiently cover the particularities of requests concerning third country nationals. Although it is now possible to exchange information on third country nationals through ECRIS, there is no procedure or mechanism in place to do
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The ECRIS legal framework, however, does not sufficiently cover the particularities of requests concerning third country nationals. Although it is
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The ECRIS legal framework, however, does not sufficiently cover the particularities of requests concerning third country nationals. Although it is
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Such 'blanket requests' impose an administrative burden on all Member States, including those not holding information on that third country national. In practice, this burden
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) To improve the situation and increase trust among citizens travelling in the EU, a system should be established by which the central authority of a Member State can find out quickly and efficiently in which other Member State(s) criminal record information on a third country national is stored so that the existing ECRIS framework can then be used to request the criminal record information from that Member State or those Member States in accordance with Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should therefore lay down rules on creating a centralised system containing and protecting personal data at the level of the Union, the division of responsibilities between the Member State and the organisation responsible for its development and maintenance, as well as any specific data protection provisions needed to supplement the existing data protection arrangements and provide for an adequate overall level of data protection and data security. The fundamental rights of the persons concerned should be protected as well.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should therefore lay down rules on creating a centralised system containing and protecting personal data at the level of the Union, the division of responsibilities between the Member State and the organisation responsible for its development and maintenance, as well as any specific data protection provisions needed to supplement the existing data protection arrangements and provide for an adequate overall level of data protection
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) The ECRIS-TCN system allows processing of fingerprint data and facial images with the aim of identifying the Member State(s) in possession of information on the criminal record of a third-country national and in order to confirm their identity. The introduction and use of fingerprint data and facial images must never exceed what is strictly necessary to achieve the aim, must respect fundamental rights, including the best interests of children, and must be in conformity with Directive (EU) 2016/680.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) established by
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) established by Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 to identify the Member State(s) holding information on previous convictions of third country nationals (ʻECRIS-TCN system’) should be entrusted with the task of developing and operating the new
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Adequate and proportionate financial and human resources should be allocated to the Agency in order to ensure the smooth implementation and management of the ECRIS-TCN system.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The ECRIS-TCN system should contain only the identity information of third country nationals convicted by a criminal court within the Union. Such identity information should include alphanumeric data
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The ECRIS-TCN system
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The ECRIS-TCN system should contain only the identity information of third country nationals convicted by a criminal court within the Union, to the extent that the decision is entered in the criminal record of the convicting Member State. Such identity information should include alphanumeric data, and fingerprint data in accordance with Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The ECRIS-TCN system should contain only the identity information of third country nationals convicted by a criminal court within the Union. Such identity information should include alphanumeric data
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The ECRIS-TCN system should contain only the identity information of third country nationals convicted by a criminal court within the Union. Such identity information should include alphanumeric data
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) In the event that there is a match between data recorded in the Central System and those used for search by a Member State (hit), the identity information against which a 'hit' was recorded is provided together with the hit. That information should only be used to assist in confirming the identity of the third country national concerned in order to verify that the recorded data is accurately assigned to the correct person to which the hit relates. This may include the recording of such data in the national criminal record database of the querying Member States as an alias of the third country national.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) In the event that there is a match between data recorded in the Central System and those used for search by a Member State (hit), the identity information against which a 'hit' was recorded is provided together with the hit. That information should only be used to assist in confirming the identity of the third country national concerned in order to verify that the recorded data is accurately assigned to the correct person to which the hit relates. This may include the recording of such data in the national criminal record database of the querying Member States as an alias of the third country national.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) The use of biometrics is necessary as it is the most reliable, accurate and rapid method of identifying third country nationals within the territory of the Member States, who are often not in possession of documents or any other means of identification, as well as for more reliable matching of third country nationals data.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) The use of biometrics is necessary as it is the most reliable method of identifying third country nationals within the territory of the Member States, who
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) The use of biometrics is
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Member States
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Member States
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Member States
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) The Member States should also be able to create a record in the ECRIS-TCN system whenever they obtain, in the course of a criminal procedure, information on convictions linked to terrorist offences or serious crime handed down to a national of a third country with which Eurojust has signed a judicial cooperation agreement.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Improving the circulation of information on convictions should assist Member States in their implementation of Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA, which obliges the Member States to take account of previous convictions in other Member States in the course of new criminal proceedings, to the extent previous national convictions are taken into account in accordance with national law.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Improving the circulation of information on convictions
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Member States should be obliged to make use of the ECRIS-TCN system in all cases where they receive a request for information on previous convictions of third country nationals in accordance with national law, and follow up on any hits with the Member States identified through the ECRIS system. This obligation should not be limited only to requests in connection with criminal investigations, but a clear list of other possible purposes should be set out in this Regulation.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Member States should
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Member States
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) A hit indicated by the ECRIS-TCN system should not automatically mean that the third country national concerned was convicted in the indicated Member State(s)
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Notwithstanding the possibility of using the Union’s financial programmes in accordance with the applicable rules, each non-obligatory participating Member State should bear its own costs arising from the implementation, administration, use and maintenance of its criminal records database and national fingerprint databases, and from the implementation, administration, use and maintenance of the technical alterations necessary to be able to use the ECRIS-
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21)
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21)
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) established by Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 , Eurojust established by Council Decision 2002/187/JHA24 [and the European Public Prosecutor's Office established by Regulation (EU) …/…25 ] should have access to the ECRIS-TCN system for identifying the Member State(s) holding criminal record information on a third county national
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 source: 615.287
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30688&j=0&l=en
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2019-01-23T00:00:00New
2019-01-22T00:00:00 |
events/9 |
|
events/9/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE612.310New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-612310_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.287New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-615287_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE612.106&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-612106_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
See also 2008/0101(CNS) Amending Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 2009/0089(COD) Amended by 2018/0152B(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
See also 2008/0101(CNS) Amending Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 2009/0089(COD)
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0018&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0018_EN.html |
events/5/date |
Old
2018-03-12T00:00:00New
2018-02-08T00:00:00 |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0149New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0149_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/12/summary |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30688&j=0&l=en
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/8/10389New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/body |
Old
EPNew
unknown |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2017-09-11T00:00:00New
2018-01-25T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee |
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
committees/2/shadows/4/group |
Old
ENFNew
Verts/ALE |
committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4f1ac80bb819f25efd0000c4New
5b3af5acd1d1c56997000000 |
committees/2/shadows/4/name |
Old
FONTANA LorenzoNew
FRANZ Romeo |
committees/2/shadows/5/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
EFD |
committees/2/shadows/5/mepref |
Old
4f1ac5d6b819f25efd000004New
5a0cf703d1d1c556ab000000 |
committees/2/shadows/5/name |
Old
ALBRECHT Jan PhilippNew
MEUTHEN Jörg |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
procedure/title |
Old
Centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third country nationals and stateless personsNew
Centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third country nationals and stateless persons (ECRIS-TCN system) |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
committees/2/shadows/5 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/2/shadows/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
LIBE/8/10389
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/2/shadows/1 |
|
committees/2/shadows |
|
committees/2/date |
2017-08-31T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-07-11T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|