BETA


2017/0245(COD) Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders

Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE
Former Responsible Committee LIBE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 59-p4, TFEU 077-p2

Events

2021/12/14
   EC - Proposal withdrawn by Commission
2019/10/09
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 72)
2019/09/24
   EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
2019/06/12
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2019/04/04
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 339 votes to 205, with 62 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the rules applicable to the temporary reintroduction of internal border control, thus closing its first reading.

The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:

A measure of last resort with enhanced cooperation

Parliament recalled that the creation of an area in which the free movement of persons across internal borders is ensured is one of the main achievements of the Union. The normal functioning and strengthening of such an area, which is based on trust and solidarity, should be a common objective of the Union and the Member States which have agreed to take part in it.

At the same time, it stressed that it is necessary to have a common response to situations seriously affecting the public policy or internal security of that area, or parts thereof, by allowing for the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort, while strengthening cooperation between the Member States concerned.

Criteria for the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls

Before reintroducing control at its internal borders, a Member State shall assess:

- whether this measure is likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security;

whether measures other than the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders, such as enhanced cross-border police cooperation or intensified police checks, are likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security;

- the proportionality of the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in relation to the threat to public policy or internal security.

Where a Member State assesses that the proposed reintroduction of internal border control is not proportionate to the threat, it shall not reintroduce or prolong internal border control. Any measure reintroducing controls at the internal borders of a Member State shall be withdrawn as soon as the underlying grounds for it cease to exist.

Possible serious threat to public policy or internal security

Where, in the area without internal border control, there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security in a Member State, that Member State may, as a measure of last resort, reintroduce border control at all or specific parts of its internal borders for a limited period of up to 30 days or, if the serious threat persists beyond 30 days, for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat but, in any event, for no longer than two months, with a possibility of a prolongation of up to an additional four months.

Whenever the reintroduction of internal border control is proposed for specific planned events of an exceptional nature and duration, such as sporting activities, the duration of such control should be very precise, circumscribed and linked to the actual duration of the event.

Risk assessment

In order to ensure that such internal border control is a measure of last resort and exceptional, Member States shall submit a risk assessment concerning its envisaged extension beyond two months.

The risk assessment shall: (i) assess how long the identified threat is expected to persist and which section of its internal borders is affected; (ii) demonstrate that the prolongation of border control is a last resort; and (iii) explain how border control would better help address the identified threat.

The risk assessment shall also contain a detailed report of the cooperation which took place between the Member State concerned and the Member State or Member States directly affected by the reintroduction of border control. The Commission shall share the risk assessment with the Agency and Europol and may request, where appropriate, their views thereon.

Consultation

Where, based on the information contained in the notification or on any additional information it has received, the Commission has concerns as regards the necessity or proportionality of the planned reintroduction of border control at internal borders, or where it considers that a consultation on some aspect of the notification would be appropriate, it shall issue an opinion to that effect without delay.

The information and any Commission or Member State opinions shall be the subject of a consultation. The consultation shall include:

- joint meetings between the Member State planning to reintroduce border control at internal borders, the other Member States, especially those directly affected by such measures, and the Commission, which shall be held with a view to organising, where appropriate, mutual cooperation between the Member States and to examining the proportionality of the measures to the events giving rise to the reintroduction of border control, including any possible alternative measures, and the threat to public policy or internal security;

- where appropriate, unannounced on-site visits by the Commission to the relevant internal borders and, where appropriate, with the support of experts from Member States and from the Agency, Europol or any other relevant Union body, office or agency, to assess the effectiveness of border controls at those internal borders and the compliance with this Regulation; the reports of such unannounced on-site visits shall be transmitted to the European Parliament.

Specific procedure in the event of a long-term threat

The Regulation shall also specifically provide for the possibility to prolong internal border controls beyond six months, on an exceptional basis. A subsequent prolongation of controls beyond six months would require an opinion from the European Commission and a Council recommendation. In any event, such a possibility shall not lead to a further extension of temporary border control beyond one year.

The European Parliament shall immediately be informed about the proposed prolongation. The Member States affected shall have the possibility to make observations to the Commission before it issues its opinion.

Documents
2018/11/29
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/11/29
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 319 votes to 241, with 78 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the rules applicable to the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal border.

The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for interinstitutional negotiations.

The main amendments adopted in plenary concern the following points:

Last resort measure : Parliament recalled that the creation of an area in which the free movement of persons across internal borders is ensured is one of the main achievements of the Union . The normal functioning and strengthening of such an area, which is based on trust and solidarity, should be a common objective of the Union and the Member States which have agreed to take part in it. At the same time, it is necessary to have a common response to situations seriously affecting the public policy or internal security of that area, or parts thereof, by allowing for the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort, while strengthening cooperation between the Member States concerned.

Criteria : before reintroducing control at its internal borders, a Member State shall assess:

whether this measure is likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; whether measures other than the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders, such as enhanced cross-border police cooperation or intensified police checks, are likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; the proportionality of the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in relation to the threat to public policy or internal security.

Where a Member State assesses that the proposed reintroduction of internal border control is not proportionate to the threat, it shall not reintroduce or prolong internal border control. Any measure reintroducing controls at the internal borders of a Member State shall be withdrawn as soon as the underlying grounds for it cease to exist.

Possible serious threat to public policy or internal security : where, in the area without internal border control, there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security in a Member State, that Member State may, as a measure of last resort, reintroduce border control at all or specific parts of its internal borders for a limited period of up to 30 days or, if the serious threat persists beyond 30 days, for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat but, in any event, for no longer than two months , with a possibility of a prolongation of up to an additional four months.

Whenever the reintroduction of internal border control is proposed for specific planned events of an exceptional nature and duration, such as sporting activities , the duration of such control should be very precise, circumscribed and linked to the actual duration of the event.

Risk assessment : in order to ensure that such internal border control is a measure of last resort and exceptional, Member States shall submit a risk assessment concerning its envisaged extension beyond two months.

The risk assessment shall: (i) assess how long the identified threat is expected to persist and which section of its internal borders is affected; (ii) demonstrate that the prolongation of border control is a last resort ; and (iii) explain how border control would better help address the identified threat.

The risk assessment shall also contain a detailed report of the cooperation which took place between the Member State concerned and the Member State or Member States directly affected by the reintroduction of border control. The Commission shall share the risk assessment with the Agency and Europol and may request, where appropriate, their views thereon.

Consultation : where, based on the information contained in the notification or on any additional information it has received, the Commission has concerns as regards the necessity or proportionality of the planned reintroduction of border control at internal borders, or where it considers that a consultation on some aspect of the notification would be appropriate, it shall issue an opinion to that effect without delay.

The information and any Commission or Member State opinions shall be the subject of a consultation. The consultation shall include:

joint meetings between the Member State planning to reintroduce border control at internal borders, the other Member States, especially those directly affected by such measures, and the Commission, which shall be held with a view to organising, where appropriate, mutual cooperation between the Member States and to examining the proportionality of the measures to the events giving rise to the reintroduction of border control, including any possible alternative measures, and the threat to public policy or internal security; where appropriate, unannounced on-site visits by the Commission to the relevant internal borders and, where appropriate, with the support of experts from Member States and from the Agency, Europol or any other relevant Union body, office or agency, to assess the effectiveness of border controls at those internal borders and the compliance with this Regulation; the reports of such unannounced on-site visits shall be transmitted to the European Parliament.

Specific procedure in the event of a long-term threat : the Regulation shall also specifically provide for the possibility to prolong internal border controls beyond six months , on an exceptional basis. A subsequent prolongation of controls beyond six months would require an opinion from the European Commission and a Council recommendation. In any event, such a possibility shall not lead to a further extension of temporary border control beyond one year .

The European Parliament shall immediately be informed about the proposed prolongation. The Member States affected shall have the possibility to make observations to the Commission before it issues its opinion.

Documents
2018/11/29
   EP - Matter referred back to the committee responsible
2018/11/05
   FR_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2018/10/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Tanja FAJON (S&D, SI) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the rules applicable to the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal border.

The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows.

General framework and criteria : Members recalled that t he creation of an area in which the free movement of persons across internal borders is ensured is one of the main achievements of the Union . The normal functioning and strengthening of such an area, which is based on trust and solidarity, should be a common objective of the Union and the Member States which have agreed to take part in it. At the same time, it is necessary to have a common response to situations seriously affecting the public policy or internal security of that area, or parts thereof, by allowing for the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort .

Before reintroducing control at its internal borders, a Member State shall assess:

whether this measure is likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; whether measures other than the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders, such as enhanced cross-border police cooperation or intensified police checks, are likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; the proportionality of the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in relation to the threat to public policy or internal security.

Any measure reintroducing controls at the internal borders of a Member State shall be withdrawn as soon as the underlying grounds for it cease to exist.

Possible serious threat to public policy or internal security : where, in the area without internal border control, there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security in a Member State, that Member State may, as a measure of last resort, reintroduce border control at all or specific parts of its internal borders for a limited period of up to 30 days or, if the serious threat persists beyond 30 days, for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat but, in any event, for no longer than two months , with a possibility of a prolongation of up to an additional four months.

In order to ensure that such internal border control is a measure of last resort and exceptional, Member States shall submit a risk assessment concerning its envisaged extension beyond two months.

The risk assessment shall: (i) assess how long the identified threat is expected to persist and which section of its internal borders is affected; (ii) demonstrate that the prolongation of border control is a last resort ; and (iii) explain how border control would better help address the identified threat.

Where, based on the information contained in the notification or on any additional information it has received, the Commission has concerns as regards the necessity or proportionality of the planned reintroduction of border control at internal borders, or where it considers that a consultation on some aspect of the notification would be appropriate, it shall issue an opinion to that effect without delay.

The information and any Commission or Member State opinions shall be the subject of a consultation. The consultation shall include:

joint meetings between the Member State planning to reintroduce border control at internal borders, the other Member States, especially those directly affected by such measures, and the Commission, which shall be held with a view to organising, where appropriate, mutual cooperation between the Member States and to examining the proportionality of the measures to the events giving rise to the reintroduction of border control, including any possible alternative measures, and the threat to public policy or internal security; where appropriate, unannounced on-site visits by the Commission to the relevant internal borders and, where appropriate, with the support of experts from Member States and from the Agency, Europol or any other relevant Union body, office or agency, to assess the effectiveness of border controls at those internal borders and the compliance with this Regulation; the reports of such unannounced on-site visits shall be transmitted to the European Parliament.

Specific procedure : the Regulation shall also specifically provide for the possibility to prolong internal border controls beyond six months, on an exceptional basis . A subsequent prolongation of controls beyond six months would require an opinion from the European Commission and a Council recommendation . In any event, such a possibility shall not lead to a further extension of temporary border control beyond one year .

The European Parliament shall immediately be informed about the proposed prolongation. The Member States affected shall have the possibility to make observations to the Commission before it issues its opinion.

Documents
2018/10/22
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2018/10/22
   EP - Rejection by committee to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
2018/05/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/04/12
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/02/05
   CZ_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2017/12/21
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2017/12/21
   EL_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2017/12/19
   ES_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2017/12/14
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2017/10/26
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2017/09/27
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to update the Schengen Borders Code to adapt the rules for the reintroduction of temporary internal border controls to the current needs to respond to evolving and persistent serious threats to public policy or internal security.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: The European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: due to the secondary movements of irregular migrants and the increase of cross-border terrorist threats posing a serious threat to the internal security of a number of Schengen States, some Members States have been compelled to extend the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls .

Based on the current Schengen rules , border controls at internal borders are possible for longer than six months when there are serious deficiencies in the external border management of a Member State, as demonstrated during a Schengen Evaluation.

In situations where the serious threat to public policy or internal security is not related to deficiencies in the management of the external borders as demonstrated during a Schengen Evaluation, the reintroduction of border control at internal borders is subject to the conditions and time limits set out in the Schengen Borders Code.

While the current rules for the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls have proved sufficient in the vast majority of cases, the maximum periods laid down in the legislation may not be sufficient when Member States face serious and persistent threats to public order or internal security.

This is why the Commission considers it necessary to adapt the maximum periods for the temporary reintroduction of border checks to current needs, while ensuring that the use of this measure remains exceptional and is decided only as a last resort.

CONTENT: the proposal seeks to update the Schengen Borders Code to prolong the time limits for internal border controls . Stronger procedural safeguards are also being introduced to ensure that border controls at internal borders remain an exception - a measure of last resort - and are used only if necessary and proportionate, limiting the impact on free movement.

The Commission proposes:

to increase up to one year (instead of six months) the maximum time limit for temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat and to increase from up to 30 days to up to six months the limit for the length of prolongation periods; to introduce better procedural safeguards in order to ensure that the decision on temporary border control at internal borders or their prolongation is based on a proper risk assessment and is taken in cooperation with the other Member States concerned. Member States will prepare and submit a risk assessment assessing how long the identified threat is expected to persist and which sections of the internal borders are affected and how border control contributed to address the identified threat; to introduce a better follow up to the opinion of the Commission expressing concerns on the necessity or proportionality of border controls being exercised for longer than six months and the consultation procedure involving the Commission, Member States and, as now proposed, relevant Agencies; a new possibility is introduced to extend internal border controls by a maximum period of two years where the serious threat to internal security or public policy persists beyond the one-year deadline , provided that it can be attributed to the same grounds (e.g. threat related to the operation of a cross-border terrorist network) and that commensurate exceptional national measures are taken within the territory to address the threat (such as the state of emergency). Such prolongation would require a Recommendation of the Council , which would need to take into account the opinion given by the Commission, and would be strictly limited to 6 month periods with the possibility to prolong no more than three times up to a maximum period of two years.

Documents

Votes

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 23S 29/11/2018 11:40:19.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 329, -: 302, 0: 10
IT HU ES SE EL DE PT FI BE EE DK CY LT IE ?? CZ LU AT LV RO SI MT BG HR SK GB NL FR PL
Total
58
17
44
20
12
79
19
10
21
6
12
6
9
10
1
18
4
18
7
27
8
5
16
8
11
62
24
62
45
icon: S&D S&D
165

Finland S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Denmark ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
186

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (1)

5

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 26 29/11/2018 11:41:01.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 330, -: 306, 0: 6
IT HU ES SE EL FI BE DE EE CZ IE CY LT RO ?? LU AT PT SI MT BG NL HR DK LV SK GB FR PL
Total
58
17
44
20
13
10
21
79
6
18
10
6
9
27
1
4
18
19
8
5
16
24
8
12
7
11
62
62
45
icon: S&D S&D
165

Finland S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Germany ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
186

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (1)

5

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 32 29/11/2018 11:43:39.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 330, -: 299, 0: 10
IT HU DE ES SE BE EL CZ FI IE EE CY LT PT RO ?? LU AT SI MT HR LV BG SK DK GB NL FR PL
Total
57
17
80
44
20
21
14
18
10
10
6
6
9
17
27
1
4
18
8
5
8
7
15
11
12
62
24
62
44
icon: S&D S&D
164

Czechia S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Germany ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
185

Greece PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (1)

5

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 64 29/11/2018 11:45:13.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: -: 410, +: 213, 0: 15
FR NL DK RO MT EE LU LV HR SI ?? CZ PL IE LT AT CY EL FI BE HU BG SK ES SE PT DE IT GB
Total
61
24
12
27
5
6
4
7
8
8
1
17
44
10
9
18
6
14
9
21
17
16
11
44
20
17
81
57
62
icon: PPE PPE
183

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
5

Lithuania PPE

1

Austria PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

5

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: ENF ENF
29

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

France NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

France Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Italy ECR

2
icon: S&D S&D
164

Netherlands S&D

3

Malta S&D

Against (2)

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland S&D

Against (1)

1
4
3

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 44 29/11/2018 11:45:30.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 325, -: 287, 0: 13
IT HU ES SE DE FI PT EL BE LT IE EE CY CZ LU ?? AT RO MT BG HR DK SI SK LV NL FR GB PL
Total
56
15
44
20
79
10
17
14
21
8
10
4
6
18
4
1
18
26
5
14
8
10
8
10
7
24
61
61
44
icon: S&D S&D
161

Finland S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Malta S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Czechia ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
58

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
180

Finland PPE

Against (1)

2

Greece PPE

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 3 29/11/2018 11:46:36.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 322, -: 300, 0: 17
IT PT SE ES BE DE EL IE FI CY LT LU RO EE ?? AT MT HR SI LV BG DK NL SK GB HU FR CZ PL
Total
58
17
20
44
21
80
14
10
10
6
9
4
27
5
1
18
5
8
8
7
16
12
24
11
62
18
59
18
45
icon: S&D S&D
165

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
3

Netherlands S&D

3
4

Czechia S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Portugal ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Czechia ALDE

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

4

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
185

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Greece PPE

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

4

Finland PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 5 29/11/2018 11:46:50.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 497, -: 123, 0: 16
DE ES IT FR RO BE HU SE PT BG NL IE AT CZ PL FI SI SK LT HR LV EE MT LU EL CY ?? DK GB
Total
79
44
56
61
27
21
18
20
16
16
24
10
18
18
45
10
8
11
8
8
7
5
5
4
14
6
1
12
62
icon: PPE PPE
184

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
163

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Spain Verts/ALE

3

France Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 6 29/11/2018 11:47:01.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 330, -: 296, 0: 10
IT HU ES DE PT SE EL FI LT BE LU IE EE CY RO ?? AT LV MT BG CZ HR SI SK NL DK GB FR PL
Total
57
16
44
81
17
20
14
10
9
21
4
10
6
6
27
1
18
7
5
16
16
8
8
10
22
12
62
62
45
icon: S&D S&D
163

Finland S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Czechia ALDE

4

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
183

Greece PPE

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 7 29/11/2018 11:47:18.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 340, -: 279, 0: 17
IT HU PT ES SE DE BE EL FI LT DK CZ IE EE CY RO ?? LU AT LV MT BG NL HR SI SK GB FR PL
Total
57
16
17
44
20
78
21
14
10
9
12
18
10
6
6
27
1
4
18
7
5
16
24
8
8
10
62
61
45
icon: S&D S&D
164

Finland S&D

1
3

Czechia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Portugal ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
57

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
184

Greece PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 12 29/11/2018 11:47:30.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 316, -: 311, 0: 11
IT HU ES SE DE FI EL BE IE EE CY LT PT RO ?? LU AT MT HR SI LV BG SK DK CZ NL GB FR PL
Total
57
17
44
20
81
10
14
21
10
4
6
9
17
27
1
4
18
5
8
8
7
15
11
12
18
24
61
62
45
icon: S&D S&D
162

Finland S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1
3

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Germany ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Czechia ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
186

Finland PPE

2

Greece PPE

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Am 15 29/11/2018 11:48:18.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 319, -: 312, 0: 8
IT HU ES SE DE FI EL BE IE PT EE CY RO ?? LT LU AT MT BG HR SI LV CZ SK DK GB NL FR PL
Total
58
17
43
20
81
10
14
21
9
17
6
6
27
1
8
4
18
5
16
8
8
7
18
10
12
62
24
62
45
icon: S&D S&D
164

Finland S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2
3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Germany ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
184

Finland PPE

2

Greece PPE

1

Ireland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0356/2018 - Tanja Fajon - Proposition de la Commission 29/11/2018 11:48:35.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 319, -: 241, 0: 78
IT ES HU SE GB DE PT BE FI AT EL EE IE LT CY RO MT BG LU ?? SK CZ LV HR SI DK NL FR PL
Total
58
44
17
19
61
81
17
21
10
18
14
6
10
9
6
27
5
16
4
1
11
18
6
8
8
12
22
62
45
icon: S&D S&D
165

Finland S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Sweden ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
185

United Kingdom PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece PPE

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Abstain (2)

4

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
6

Latvia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
166 2017/0245(COD)
2018/05/17 LIBE 166 amendments...
source: 622.093

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1/rapporteur
  • name: FAJON Tanja date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
events/11
date
2021-12-14T00:00:00
type
Proposal withdrawn by Commission
body
EC
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position
New
Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
docs/3/date
Old
2017-12-18T00:00:00
New
2017-12-19T00:00:00
docs/4/date
Old
2017-12-20T00:00:00
New
2017-12-21T00:00:00
docs/5/date
Old
2018-02-04T00:00:00
New
2018-02-05T00:00:00
docs/6/date
Old
2017-12-20T00:00:00
New
2017-12-21T00:00:00
docs/7/date
Old
2017-12-13T00:00:00
New
2017-12-14T00:00:00
docs/8/date
Old
2018-11-04T00:00:00
New
2018-11-05T00:00:00
docs/2/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31745&j=0&l=en
docs/2/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31745&j=0&l=en
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571
docs/0
date
2017-09-27T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/3
date
2017-12-19T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
ES_PARLIAMENT
docs/3/date
Old
2017-12-19T00:00:00
New
2017-12-18T00:00:00
docs/4
date
2017-12-19T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
ES_PARLIAMENT
docs/4
date
2017-12-21T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/4/date
Old
2017-12-21T00:00:00
New
2017-12-20T00:00:00
docs/5
date
2017-12-21T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/5
date
2018-02-05T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
CZ_CHAMBER
docs/5/date
Old
2018-02-05T00:00:00
New
2018-02-04T00:00:00
docs/6
date
2018-02-05T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
CZ_CHAMBER
docs/6
date
2017-12-21T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
EL_PARLIAMENT
docs/6/date
Old
2017-12-21T00:00:00
New
2017-12-20T00:00:00
docs/7
date
2017-12-21T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
EL_PARLIAMENT
docs/7
date
2017-12-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/7/date
Old
2017-12-14T00:00:00
New
2017-12-13T00:00:00
docs/8
date
2017-12-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/8
date
2018-11-05T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
FR_SENATE
docs/8/date
Old
2018-11-05T00:00:00
New
2018-11-04T00:00:00
docs/9
date
2018-11-05T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571
type
Contribution
body
FR_SENATE
events/0
date
2017-09-27T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/0
date
2017-09-27T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
events/0
date
2017-09-27T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-618307_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-622093_EN.html
events/1/body
EP
events/2/body
EP
events/4/body
EP
events/6/body
EP
events/8/body
EP
docs/0
date
2017-09-27T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
events/0
date
2017-09-27T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/0
date
2018-04-12T00:00:00
docs
title: PE618.307
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/0
date
2017-09-27T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.307
docs/1
date
2018-04-12T00:00:00
docs
title: PE618.307
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
2018-05-17T00:00:00
docs
title: PE622.093
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE622.093
docs/2
date
2018-05-17T00:00:00
docs
title: PE622.093
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/0
date
2017-10-26T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/0
date
2017-09-27T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/1
date
2018-10-22T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/1
date
2017-10-26T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/2
date
2018-10-22T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2018-10-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0356_EN.html title: A8-0356/2018
summary
events/4
date
2018-10-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0356_EN.html title: A8-0356/2018
summary
events/5
date
2018-11-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0472_EN.html title: T8-0472/2018
summary
events/6
date
2018-11-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0472_EN.html title: T8-0472/2018
summary
events/7
date
2019-04-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0356_EN.html title: T8-0356/2019
summary
events/8
date
2019-04-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0356_EN.html title: T8-0356/2019
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: S&D - Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: S&D - Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
96911
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
New
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.307
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.307
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE622.093
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE622.093
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0356_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0356_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0472_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0472_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0356_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0356_EN.html
events/10/body
EP
events/10
date
2019-10-09T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 72)
docs/2/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A8-2018-0356&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0356_EN.html
events/5
date
2018-11-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0472 title: T8-0472/2018
summary
events/5
date
2019-04-04T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31745&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/5/date
Old
2019-04-04T00:00:00
New
2018-11-29T00:00:00
events/6
date
2018-11-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0472 title: T8-0472/2018
summary
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0472
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0472_EN.html
events/7
date
2019-04-04T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31745&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0356
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0356_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0356&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A8-2018-0356&language=EN
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0472
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0472
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0356
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0356
events/9
date
2019-09-24T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
body
EP
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2019-09-04T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2017-11-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
docs/2/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31745&j=0&l=en
docs/2
date
2019-06-12T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2019)443
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events/7
date
2019-04-04T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31745&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
activities
  • date: 2017-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0571/COM_COM(2017)0571_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0571 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52017PC0571:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en title: Migration and Home Affairs Commissioner: AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2017-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: NAGY József group: ECR name: HALLA-AHO Jussi group: ALDE name: IN 'T VELD Sophia group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine group: Verts/ALE name: VALERO Bodil group: EFD name: FERRARA Laura group: ENF name: BAY Nicolas responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
commission
  • body: EC dg: Migration and Home Affairs commissioner: AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2017-11-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FAJON Tanja group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2017-11-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
docs
  • date: 2018-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.307 title: PE618.307 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-05-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE622.093 title: PE622.093 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571 type: Contribution body: ES_PARLIAMENT
  • date: 2017-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
  • date: 2018-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571 type: Contribution body: CZ_CHAMBER
  • date: 2017-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571 type: Contribution body: EL_PARLIAMENT
  • date: 2017-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571 type: Contribution body: CZ_SENATE
  • date: 2018-11-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0571 title: COM(2017)0571 type: Contribution body: FR_SENATE
events
  • date: 2017-09-27T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0571/COM_COM(2017)0571_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0571 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2017&nu_doc=0571 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to update the Schengen Borders Code to adapt the rules for the reintroduction of temporary internal border controls to the current needs to respond to evolving and persistent serious threats to public policy or internal security. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: The European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: due to the secondary movements of irregular migrants and the increase of cross-border terrorist threats posing a serious threat to the internal security of a number of Schengen States, some Members States have been compelled to extend the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls . Based on the current Schengen rules , border controls at internal borders are possible for longer than six months when there are serious deficiencies in the external border management of a Member State, as demonstrated during a Schengen Evaluation. In situations where the serious threat to public policy or internal security is not related to deficiencies in the management of the external borders as demonstrated during a Schengen Evaluation, the reintroduction of border control at internal borders is subject to the conditions and time limits set out in the Schengen Borders Code. While the current rules for the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls have proved sufficient in the vast majority of cases, the maximum periods laid down in the legislation may not be sufficient when Member States face serious and persistent threats to public order or internal security. This is why the Commission considers it necessary to adapt the maximum periods for the temporary reintroduction of border checks to current needs, while ensuring that the use of this measure remains exceptional and is decided only as a last resort. CONTENT: the proposal seeks to update the Schengen Borders Code to prolong the time limits for internal border controls . Stronger procedural safeguards are also being introduced to ensure that border controls at internal borders remain an exception - a measure of last resort - and are used only if necessary and proportionate, limiting the impact on free movement. The Commission proposes: to increase up to one year (instead of six months) the maximum time limit for temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat and to increase from up to 30 days to up to six months the limit for the length of prolongation periods; to introduce better procedural safeguards in order to ensure that the decision on temporary border control at internal borders or their prolongation is based on a proper risk assessment and is taken in cooperation with the other Member States concerned. Member States will prepare and submit a risk assessment assessing how long the identified threat is expected to persist and which sections of the internal borders are affected and how border control contributed to address the identified threat; to introduce a better follow up to the opinion of the Commission expressing concerns on the necessity or proportionality of border controls being exercised for longer than six months and the consultation procedure involving the Commission, Member States and, as now proposed, relevant Agencies; a new possibility is introduced to extend internal border controls by a maximum period of two years where the serious threat to internal security or public policy persists beyond the one-year deadline , provided that it can be attributed to the same grounds (e.g. threat related to the operation of a cross-border terrorist network) and that commensurate exceptional national measures are taken within the territory to address the threat (such as the state of emergency). Such prolongation would require a Recommendation of the Council , which would need to take into account the opinion given by the Commission, and would be strictly limited to 6 month periods with the possibility to prolong no more than three times up to a maximum period of two years.
  • date: 2017-10-26T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-22T00:00:00 type: Rejection by committee to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-29T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0356&language=EN title: A8-0356/2018 summary: The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Tanja FAJON (S&D, SI) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the rules applicable to the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal border. The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows. General framework and criteria : Members recalled that t he creation of an area in which the free movement of persons across internal borders is ensured is one of the main achievements of the Union . The normal functioning and strengthening of such an area, which is based on trust and solidarity, should be a common objective of the Union and the Member States which have agreed to take part in it. At the same time, it is necessary to have a common response to situations seriously affecting the public policy or internal security of that area, or parts thereof, by allowing for the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort . Before reintroducing control at its internal borders, a Member State shall assess: whether this measure is likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; whether measures other than the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders, such as enhanced cross-border police cooperation or intensified police checks, are likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; the proportionality of the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in relation to the threat to public policy or internal security. Any measure reintroducing controls at the internal borders of a Member State shall be withdrawn as soon as the underlying grounds for it cease to exist. Possible serious threat to public policy or internal security : where, in the area without internal border control, there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security in a Member State, that Member State may, as a measure of last resort, reintroduce border control at all or specific parts of its internal borders for a limited period of up to 30 days or, if the serious threat persists beyond 30 days, for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat but, in any event, for no longer than two months , with a possibility of a prolongation of up to an additional four months. In order to ensure that such internal border control is a measure of last resort and exceptional, Member States shall submit a risk assessment concerning its envisaged extension beyond two months. The risk assessment shall: (i) assess how long the identified threat is expected to persist and which section of its internal borders is affected; (ii) demonstrate that the prolongation of border control is a last resort ; and (iii) explain how border control would better help address the identified threat. Where, based on the information contained in the notification or on any additional information it has received, the Commission has concerns as regards the necessity or proportionality of the planned reintroduction of border control at internal borders, or where it considers that a consultation on some aspect of the notification would be appropriate, it shall issue an opinion to that effect without delay. The information and any Commission or Member State opinions shall be the subject of a consultation. The consultation shall include: joint meetings between the Member State planning to reintroduce border control at internal borders, the other Member States, especially those directly affected by such measures, and the Commission, which shall be held with a view to organising, where appropriate, mutual cooperation between the Member States and to examining the proportionality of the measures to the events giving rise to the reintroduction of border control, including any possible alternative measures, and the threat to public policy or internal security; where appropriate, unannounced on-site visits by the Commission to the relevant internal borders and, where appropriate, with the support of experts from Member States and from the Agency, Europol or any other relevant Union body, office or agency, to assess the effectiveness of border controls at those internal borders and the compliance with this Regulation; the reports of such unannounced on-site visits shall be transmitted to the European Parliament. Specific procedure : the Regulation shall also specifically provide for the possibility to prolong internal border controls beyond six months, on an exceptional basis . A subsequent prolongation of controls beyond six months would require an opinion from the European Commission and a Council recommendation . In any event, such a possibility shall not lead to a further extension of temporary border control beyond one year . The European Parliament shall immediately be informed about the proposed prolongation. The Member States affected shall have the possibility to make observations to the Commission before it issues its opinion.
  • date: 2018-11-29T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0472 title: T8-0472/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 319 votes to 241, with 78 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the rules applicable to the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal border. The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for interinstitutional negotiations. The main amendments adopted in plenary concern the following points: Last resort measure : Parliament recalled that the creation of an area in which the free movement of persons across internal borders is ensured is one of the main achievements of the Union . The normal functioning and strengthening of such an area, which is based on trust and solidarity, should be a common objective of the Union and the Member States which have agreed to take part in it. At the same time, it is necessary to have a common response to situations seriously affecting the public policy or internal security of that area, or parts thereof, by allowing for the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort, while strengthening cooperation between the Member States concerned. Criteria : before reintroducing control at its internal borders, a Member State shall assess: whether this measure is likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; whether measures other than the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders, such as enhanced cross-border police cooperation or intensified police checks, are likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; the proportionality of the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in relation to the threat to public policy or internal security. Where a Member State assesses that the proposed reintroduction of internal border control is not proportionate to the threat, it shall not reintroduce or prolong internal border control. Any measure reintroducing controls at the internal borders of a Member State shall be withdrawn as soon as the underlying grounds for it cease to exist. Possible serious threat to public policy or internal security : where, in the area without internal border control, there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security in a Member State, that Member State may, as a measure of last resort, reintroduce border control at all or specific parts of its internal borders for a limited period of up to 30 days or, if the serious threat persists beyond 30 days, for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat but, in any event, for no longer than two months , with a possibility of a prolongation of up to an additional four months. Whenever the reintroduction of internal border control is proposed for specific planned events of an exceptional nature and duration, such as sporting activities , the duration of such control should be very precise, circumscribed and linked to the actual duration of the event. Risk assessment : in order to ensure that such internal border control is a measure of last resort and exceptional, Member States shall submit a risk assessment concerning its envisaged extension beyond two months. The risk assessment shall: (i) assess how long the identified threat is expected to persist and which section of its internal borders is affected; (ii) demonstrate that the prolongation of border control is a last resort ; and (iii) explain how border control would better help address the identified threat. The risk assessment shall also contain a detailed report of the cooperation which took place between the Member State concerned and the Member State or Member States directly affected by the reintroduction of border control. The Commission shall share the risk assessment with the Agency and Europol and may request, where appropriate, their views thereon. Consultation : where, based on the information contained in the notification or on any additional information it has received, the Commission has concerns as regards the necessity or proportionality of the planned reintroduction of border control at internal borders, or where it considers that a consultation on some aspect of the notification would be appropriate, it shall issue an opinion to that effect without delay. The information and any Commission or Member State opinions shall be the subject of a consultation. The consultation shall include: joint meetings between the Member State planning to reintroduce border control at internal borders, the other Member States, especially those directly affected by such measures, and the Commission, which shall be held with a view to organising, where appropriate, mutual cooperation between the Member States and to examining the proportionality of the measures to the events giving rise to the reintroduction of border control, including any possible alternative measures, and the threat to public policy or internal security; where appropriate, unannounced on-site visits by the Commission to the relevant internal borders and, where appropriate, with the support of experts from Member States and from the Agency, Europol or any other relevant Union body, office or agency, to assess the effectiveness of border controls at those internal borders and the compliance with this Regulation; the reports of such unannounced on-site visits shall be transmitted to the European Parliament. Specific procedure in the event of a long-term threat : the Regulation shall also specifically provide for the possibility to prolong internal border controls beyond six months , on an exceptional basis. A subsequent prolongation of controls beyond six months would require an opinion from the European Commission and a Council recommendation. In any event, such a possibility shall not lead to a further extension of temporary border control beyond one year . The European Parliament shall immediately be informed about the proposed prolongation. The Member States affected shall have the possibility to make observations to the Commission before it issues its opinion.
  • date: 2018-11-29T00:00:00 type: Matter referred back to the committee responsible body: EP
  • date: 2019-04-04T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0356 title: T8-0356/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 339 votes to 205, with 62 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the rules applicable to the temporary reintroduction of internal border control, thus closing its first reading. The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows: A measure of last resort with enhanced cooperation Parliament recalled that the creation of an area in which the free movement of persons across internal borders is ensured is one of the main achievements of the Union. The normal functioning and strengthening of such an area, which is based on trust and solidarity, should be a common objective of the Union and the Member States which have agreed to take part in it. At the same time, it stressed that it is necessary to have a common response to situations seriously affecting the public policy or internal security of that area, or parts thereof, by allowing for the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort, while strengthening cooperation between the Member States concerned. Criteria for the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls Before reintroducing control at its internal borders, a Member State shall assess: - whether this measure is likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; whether measures other than the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders, such as enhanced cross-border police cooperation or intensified police checks, are likely to sufficiently remedy the threat to public policy or internal security; - the proportionality of the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in relation to the threat to public policy or internal security. Where a Member State assesses that the proposed reintroduction of internal border control is not proportionate to the threat, it shall not reintroduce or prolong internal border control. Any measure reintroducing controls at the internal borders of a Member State shall be withdrawn as soon as the underlying grounds for it cease to exist. Possible serious threat to public policy or internal security Where, in the area without internal border control, there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security in a Member State, that Member State may, as a measure of last resort, reintroduce border control at all or specific parts of its internal borders for a limited period of up to 30 days or, if the serious threat persists beyond 30 days, for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat but, in any event, for no longer than two months, with a possibility of a prolongation of up to an additional four months. Whenever the reintroduction of internal border control is proposed for specific planned events of an exceptional nature and duration, such as sporting activities, the duration of such control should be very precise, circumscribed and linked to the actual duration of the event. Risk assessment In order to ensure that such internal border control is a measure of last resort and exceptional, Member States shall submit a risk assessment concerning its envisaged extension beyond two months. The risk assessment shall: (i) assess how long the identified threat is expected to persist and which section of its internal borders is affected; (ii) demonstrate that the prolongation of border control is a last resort; and (iii) explain how border control would better help address the identified threat. The risk assessment shall also contain a detailed report of the cooperation which took place between the Member State concerned and the Member State or Member States directly affected by the reintroduction of border control. The Commission shall share the risk assessment with the Agency and Europol and may request, where appropriate, their views thereon. Consultation Where, based on the information contained in the notification or on any additional information it has received, the Commission has concerns as regards the necessity or proportionality of the planned reintroduction of border control at internal borders, or where it considers that a consultation on some aspect of the notification would be appropriate, it shall issue an opinion to that effect without delay. The information and any Commission or Member State opinions shall be the subject of a consultation. The consultation shall include: - joint meetings between the Member State planning to reintroduce border control at internal borders, the other Member States, especially those directly affected by such measures, and the Commission, which shall be held with a view to organising, where appropriate, mutual cooperation between the Member States and to examining the proportionality of the measures to the events giving rise to the reintroduction of border control, including any possible alternative measures, and the threat to public policy or internal security; - where appropriate, unannounced on-site visits by the Commission to the relevant internal borders and, where appropriate, with the support of experts from Member States and from the Agency, Europol or any other relevant Union body, office or agency, to assess the effectiveness of border controls at those internal borders and the compliance with this Regulation; the reports of such unannounced on-site visits shall be transmitted to the European Parliament. Specific procedure in the event of a long-term threat The Regulation shall also specifically provide for the possibility to prolong internal border controls beyond six months, on an exceptional basis. A subsequent prolongation of controls beyond six months would require an opinion from the European Commission and a Council recommendation. In any event, such a possibility shall not lead to a further extension of temporary border control beyond one year. The European Parliament shall immediately be informed about the proposed prolongation. The Member States affected shall have the possibility to make observations to the Commission before it issues its opinion.
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en title: Migration and Home Affairs commissioner: AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/8/11152
New
  • LIBE/8/11152
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 2015/0006(COD)
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 59-p4
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.10.02 Schengen area, Schengen acquis
  • 7.10.04 External borders crossing and controls, visas
New
7.10.02
Schengen area, Schengen acquis
7.10.04
External borders crossing and controls, visas
procedure/summary
  • Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399
activities/1/committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: NAGY József
  • group: ECR name: HALLA-AHO Jussi
  • group: ALDE name: IN 'T VELD Sophia
  • group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine
  • group: Verts/ALE name: VALERO Bodil
  • group: EFD name: FERRARA Laura
  • group: ENF name: BAY Nicolas
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: NAGY József
  • group: ECR name: HALLA-AHO Jussi
  • group: ALDE name: IN 'T VELD Sophia
  • group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine
  • group: Verts/ALE name: VALERO Bodil
  • group: EFD name: FERRARA Laura
  • group: ENF name: BAY Nicolas
procedure/subject/0
Old
7.10.02 Schengen area
New
7.10.02 Schengen area, Schengen acquis
activities/1/committees/0/date
2017-11-20T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
committees/0/date
2017-11-20T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to update the Schengen Borders Code to adapt the rules for the reintroduction of temporary internal border controls to the current needs to respond to evolving and persistent serious threats to public policy or internal security.

    PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: The European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

    BACKGROUND: due to the secondary movements of irregular migrants and the increase of cross-border terrorist threats posing a serious threat to the internal security of a number of Schengen States, some Members States have been compelled to extend the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls.

    Based on the current Schengen rules, border controls at internal borders are possible for longer than six months when there are serious deficiencies in the external border management of a Member State, as demonstrated during a Schengen Evaluation.

    In situations where the serious threat to public policy or internal security is not related to deficiencies in the management of the external borders as demonstrated during a Schengen Evaluation, the reintroduction of border control at internal borders is subject to the conditions and time limits set out in the Schengen Borders Code.

    While the current rules for the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls have proved sufficient in the vast majority of cases, the maximum periods laid down in the legislation may not be sufficient when Member States face serious and persistent threats to public order or internal security.

    This is why the Commission considers it necessary to adapt the maximum periods for the temporary reintroduction of border checks to current needs, while ensuring that the use of this measure remains exceptional and is decided only as a last resort.

    CONTENT: the proposal seeks to update the Schengen Borders Code to prolong the time limits for internal border controls. Stronger procedural safeguards are also being introduced to ensure that border controls at internal borders remain an exception - a measure of last resort - and are used only if necessary and proportionate, limiting the impact on free movement.

    The Commission proposes:

    • to increase up to one year (instead of six months) the maximum time limit for temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat and to increase from up to 30 days to up to six months the limit for the length of prolongation periods;
    • to introduce better procedural safeguards in order to ensure that the decision on temporary border control at internal borders or their prolongation is based on a proper risk assessment and is taken in cooperation with the other Member States concerned. Member States will prepare and submit a risk assessment assessing how long the identified threat is expected to persist and which sections of the internal borders are affected and how border control contributed to address the identified threat;
    • to introduce a better follow up to the opinion of the Commission expressing concerns on the necessity or proportionality of border controls being exercised for longer than six months and the consultation procedure involving the Commission, Member States and, as now proposed, relevant Agencies;
    • a new possibility is introduced to extend internal border controls by a maximum period of two years where the serious threat to internal security or public policy persists beyond the one-year deadline, provided that it can be attributed to the same grounds (e.g. threat related to the operation of a cross-border terrorist network) and that commensurate exceptional national measures are taken within the territory to address the threat (such as the state of emergency). Such prolongation would require a Recommendation of the Council, which would need to take into account the opinion given by the Commission, and would be strictly limited to 6 month periods with the possibility to prolong no more than three times up to a maximum period of two years.
activities/1
date
2017-10-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/8/11152
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
AVRAMOPOULOS Dimitris
activities
  • date: 2017-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0571/COM_COM(2017)0571_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52017PC0571:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2017)0571 body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission:
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2017/0245(COD)
    instrument
    Regulation
    legal_basis
    Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 077-p2
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    summary
    Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399
    subtype
    Legislation
    title
    Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders
    type
    COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
    subject