BETA


Events

2019/04/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2019/03/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/03/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 237 votes to 152, with 18 abstentions, a resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Monetary Fund.

A fully-fledged European body

Members welcomed the Commission's proposal of 6 December 2017 on the establishment of the European Monetary Fund and considers it a useful contribution to the ongoing debate on the future of Europe, the deepening of the EMU and the ESM reform. They requested an assessment of the implications of the choice of the name of the reformed ESM and suggested that the ESM should retain its current name recognised in the capital market, to make it clear that the eurozone’s monetary policy remains the competence of the ECB.

Oversight of national parliaments and the European Parliament

Recalling the role of national parliaments in budgetary and democratic control, Members believe that the scrutiny of the reformed ESM by national parliaments and the European Parliament should be improved. If in the future, budgetary resources of the Union are concerned, Parliament should have the political power to exercise all the budgetary control rights applicable to the ESM in the context of the discharge procedure. The European Court of Auditors should be considered the independent external auditor and be given a clear and formal role in the discharge procedure.

Members proposed the elaboration, with immediate effect, of an interim Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) between the ESM and Parliament, in order to improve inter-institutional dialogue and increase the transparency and accountability of the ESM, specifying the European Parliament's rights with regard to matters put forward ESM, regular hearings, nomination rights and appropriate budgetary control rights.

The Managing Director of the reformed ESM should be elected by and report to the European Parliament, following a proposal by the Council. Gender balance be ensured in the composition of the reformed ESM governing bodies.

Missions and governance

Parliament considered that the reformed ESM should retain as its primary mission the task of providing transitional financial assistance to Member States in need, on the basis of specific conditions agreed in adjustment programmes, and that it should have sufficient capacity to do so. It therefore opposed any attempt to turn the reformed EMS into an instrument reserved for banks or to reduce its financial capacity to support Member States.

The resolution highlighted the following points:

- the range of financial instruments available for the ESM should be available and improved for the reformed ESM, including the possibility of providing sufficient precautionary financial assistance, enabling Member States to access assistance before they face major difficulties in raising funds in the capital market;

- participation in an ESM should be possible for all EU Member States;

- the ESM should play a more prominent role in the management of financial assistance programmes, alongside the Commission and in close cooperation with the ECB, ensuring that the EU institutional framework has more autonomy whenever needed;

- the reformed ESM should have its own expertise to produce and assess the elements required by its statute; however, the evaluation of the financial assistance requests made by the ESM, as well as its decision-making on the design of the adjustment programmes should in no way replace normal macroeconomic and fiscal surveillance provided for in the EU’s fiscal rules and regulations, which must remain the Commission’s exclusive competence;

- the current governance framework should be assessed with a view to defining an effective decision-making procedure for the reform of the ESM.

Parliament called for a swift ESM reform that also redefines its role, functions and financial tools, so that the reformed ESM can offer liquidity support in the case of resolution and serve as a fiscal backstop for the SRF. It also called for the common backstop to be made operational as soon as possible, by 2020, subject to the agreed conditions, and, in any case, before 2024.

Documents
2019/03/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/03/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/02/26
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the interim report jointly presented by Vladimír MAŇKA (S&D, SK) and Pedro SILVA PEREIRA (S&D, PT) on the proposal for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Monetary Fund.

A fully-fledged European body

Members welcomed the Commission's proposal of 6 December 2017 to integrate the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) into the Union's legal order. They requested an assessment of the implications of the choice of the name of the reformed ESM and suggested that the ESM should retain its current name recognised in the capital market, to make it clear that the eurozone’s monetary policy remains the competence of the ECB.

Oversight of national parliaments and the European Parliament

Recalling the role of national parliaments in budgetary and democratic control, Members believe that the scrutiny of the reformed ESM by national parliaments and the European Parliament should be improved. If in the future, budgetary resources of the Union are concerned, Parliament should have the political power to exercise all the budgetary control rights applicable to the ESM in the context of the discharge procedure.

Members propose the elaboration, with immediate effect, of an interim Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) between the ESM and Parliament, in order to improve inter-institutional dialogue and increase the transparency and accountability of the ESM, specifying the European Parliament's rights with regard to matters put forward ESM, regular hearings, nomination rights and appropriate budgetary control rights.

The Managing Director of the reformed ESM should be elected by and report to the European Parliament, following a proposal by the Council. Gender balance be ensured in the composition of the reformed ESM governing bodies.

Missions and governance

Members believe that the reformed ESM should retain as its primary mission the task of providing transitional financial assistance to Member States in need, on the basis of specific conditions agreed in adjustment programmes, and that it should have sufficient capacity to do so. They therefore oppose any attempt to turn the reformed EMS into an instrument reserved for banks or to reduce its financial capacity to support Member States.

The report highlights the following points:

- the range of financial instruments available for the ESM should be available and improved for the reformed ESM, including the possibility of providing sufficient precautionary financial assistance, enabling Member States to access assistance before they face major difficulties in raising funds in the capital market;

- participation in an ESM should be possible for all EU Member States;

- the ESM should play a more prominent role in the management of financial assistance programmes, alongside the Commission and in close cooperation with the ECB, ensuring that the EU institutional framework has more autonomy whenever needed;

- the reformed ESM should have its own expertise to produce and assess the elements required by its statute;

- the current governance framework should be assessed with a view to defining an effective decision-making procedure for the reform of the ESM.

The report called for a swift ESM reform that also redefines its role, functions and financial tools, so that the reformed ESM can offer liquidity support in the case of resolution and serve as a fiscal backstop for the SRF. It also called for the common backstop to be made operational as soon as possible, by 2020, subject to the agreed conditions, and, in any case, before 2024.

Documents
2019/02/20
   EP - Vote in committee
2019/01/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2019/01/17
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2019/01/09
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/11/22
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/10/09
   EP - IVAN Cătălin Sorin (NA) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2018/09/24
   EP - HÜBNER Danuta Maria (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2018/07/05
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2018/07/05
   EP - MAŇKA Vladimír (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ['BUDG', 'ECON']
2018/07/05
   EP - SILVA PEREIRA Pedro (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ['BUDG', 'ECON']

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0087/2019 - Pedro Silva Pereira et Vladimír Maňka - Am 25 14/03/2019 13:03:30.000 #

2019/03/14 Outcome: -: 301, +: 63, 0: 16
DK IE EL IT HU LU EE SI MT SK AT HR SE LV LT CZ BG FI NL FR BE PT GB RO ES PL DE
Total
4
6
2
35
7
4
4
4
4
7
9
5
8
6
6
13
9
9
21
38
14
12
30
14
26
25
57
icon: ENF ENF
21

Austria ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
22

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

3

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Germany GUE/NGL

5
icon: NI NI
6

Greece NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
41

Denmark ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Belgium ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
28

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
43

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
84

Denmark S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

1

Austria S&D

1

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Finland S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Poland S&D

1
icon: PPE PPE
108

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Malta PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

3
4

Croatia PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Bulgaria PPE

3

Finland PPE

2
3

Belgium PPE

2

Portugal PPE

3

A8-0087/2019 - Pedro Silva Pereira et Vladimír Maňka - Am 5=17= 14/03/2019 13:03:45.000 #

2019/03/14 Outcome: -: 297, +: 101, 0: 7
GB IT IE DK EL SK HR LU LV HU EE SI MT NL SE FI AT BE BG CZ PT LT FR ES RO PL DE
Total
33
38
5
4
2
7
5
3
6
8
4
4
4
21
8
9
8
15
9
14
13
7
45
26
15
26
65
icon: EFDD EFDD
25

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
22

United Kingdom ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

3

Austria ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Germany GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

5
icon: ECR ECR
42

Italy ECR

1

Denmark ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
6

Greece NI

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
5
icon: ALDE ALDE
43

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

4

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
93

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

Against (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2
2

Belgium S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Poland S&D

1
icon: PPE PPE
115

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PPE

3

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Malta PPE

2
3

Finland PPE

2

Austria PPE

3

Belgium PPE

2

Bulgaria PPE

3

Portugal PPE

3

A8-0087/2019 - Pedro Silva Pereira et Vladimír Maňka - Am 6 14/03/2019 13:04:07.000 #

2019/03/14 Outcome: -: 342, +: 66, 0: 5
DK EL LU AT EE IE SI MT SK HU HR IT LV LT SE FI NL BG CZ PT FR BE RO GB PL ES DE
Total
4
2
3
8
4
5
4
4
7
8
5
37
6
7
8
8
21
9
14
13
50
17
15
34
25
28
66
icon: ENF ENF
24

Austria ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
24

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
6

Greece NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
42

Denmark ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Germany ECR

Against (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
43

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
97

Denmark S&D

2

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1
2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Poland S&D

1
icon: PPE PPE
114

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Austria PPE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Malta PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

3

Croatia PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Finland PPE

2
3

Bulgaria PPE

3

Portugal PPE

3
3

A8-0087/2019 - Pedro Silva Pereira et Vladimír Maňka - Am 21 14/03/2019 13:04:22.000 #

2019/03/14 Outcome: -: 250, 0: 91, +: 70
IE EL LU ES AT DK MT LV LT HR EE SE HU SI PT FI BG SK RO BE CZ DE GB NL IT FR PL
Total
5
2
3
28
8
4
4
6
7
5
4
8
8
4
13
9
7
7
15
17
14
66
34
21
37
49
25
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: S&D S&D
96

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Greece S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Austria S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Malta S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium S&D

For (1)

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Poland S&D

1
icon: NI NI
6

Greece NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
24

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
24

Austria ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
42

Latvia ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
42

Denmark ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
112

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Austria PPE

Against (2)

2

Malta PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Portugal PPE

3

Finland PPE

2

Bulgaria PPE

3

Slovakia PPE

3

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

3
3

A8-0087/2019 - Pedro Silva Pereira et Vladimír Maňka - Am 22 14/03/2019 13:04:34.000 #

2019/03/14 Outcome: -: 286, +: 86, 0: 33
IE EL LU AT IT SE HR SI HU LV EE DK MT LT ES SK BE FR BG FI PT CZ NL RO GB PL DE
Total
5
2
3
8
38
7
5
3
7
6
4
4
4
7
26
7
17
47
8
8
13
14
21
15
34
25
66
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
25

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
6

Greece NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

1
icon: ENF ENF
24

Austria ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
42

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
43

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
93

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Austria S&D

Against (1)

2

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Malta S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

Against (1)

1

Poland S&D

1
icon: PPE PPE
112

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Austria PPE

Against (2)

2

Croatia PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

3
4

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

3

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria PPE

3

Finland PPE

2

Portugal PPE

3
3

A8-0087/2019 - Pedro Silva Pereira et Vladimír Maňka - Am 24 14/03/2019 13:04:46.000 #

2019/03/14 Outcome: -: 238, 0: 128, +: 42
LU EL AT DK IE SE LV LT HR EE MT SI PT BE FI RO SK HU BG ES CZ IT PL NL GB DE FR
Total
3
2
8
4
5
8
6
7
5
4
4
4
13
17
10
15
7
8
8
28
13
38
25
19
34
62
50
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2
icon: S&D S&D
94

Luxembourg S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Greece S&D

Abstain (1)

1
2

Denmark S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Poland S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
6

Greece NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
25

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Germany GUE/NGL

5
icon: ENF ENF
24

Austria ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
43

Denmark ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Finland ECR

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
43

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

2
icon: PPE PPE
111

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Austria PPE

Against (2)

2

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Croatia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2
4

Portugal PPE

3

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

3

Finland PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

3

Bulgaria PPE

3
3

A8-0087/2019 - Pedro Silva Pereira et Vladimír Maňka - Am 18 14/03/2019 13:04:58.000 #

2019/03/14 Outcome: -: 280, +: 117, 0: 14
IT IE EL AT LU PL SE HR FR HU LV EE DK SI MT LT ES SK CZ BE FI BG PT NL RO GB DE
Total
38
5
2
8
3
25
8
5
50
7
6
4
4
4
4
7
26
7
14
17
10
8
13
21
15
33
66
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
25

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
24

Austria ENF

2

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
6

Greece NI

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

1
icon: ECR ECR
42

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Finland ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
43

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
96

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1