BETA


2017/0355(COD) Transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union

Progress: Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead EMPL CALVET CHAMBON Enrique (icon: ALDE ALDE) RADTKE Dennis (icon: PPE PPE), LÓPEZ Javi (icon: S&D S&D), MCINTYRE Anthea (icon: ECR ECR), LÓPEZ BERMEJO Paloma (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), MESZERICS Tamás (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), AGEA Laura (icon: EFDD EFDD), MÉLIN Joëlle (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion JURI CHRYSOGONOS Kostas (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion FEMM ARENA Maria (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 153-p1, TFEU 153-p2

Events

2019/06/20
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2019/06/20
   CSL - Final act signed
2019/06/20
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/06/13
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2019/06/13
   CSL - Council Meeting
2019/04/16
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/04/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 466 votes to 145, with 37 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union.

The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:

Promote more transparent and predictable employment

The Directive shall lay down minimum rights that apply to every worker in the Union who has an employment contract or employment relationship as defined by the law, collective agreements or practice in force in each Member State with consideration to the case-law of the Court of Justice.

Provided they meet the criteria established by the Court of Justice to determine the status of a worker, domestic workers, on-demand workers, intermittent workers, voucher based-workers, platform workers, trainees and apprentices could fall within the scope of this Directive.

Member States may decide not to apply the obligations of the Directive to workers with an employment relationship in which their predetermined and actual working hours that amount to an average of three hours per week or less in a reference period of four consecutive weeks.

Obligation to provide information

All workers shall be informed in writing (in paper or electronic form) from the first day of work and no later than 7 calendar days of the main aspects of their contract, such as the identity of the parties to the employment relationship, the workplace, and a summary description of the work, the start date of the employment relationship and the end date in the case of a fixed-term employment relationship, the duration and conditions of the probationary period and the remuneration per normal working day or reference hours for those whose working hours are unpredictable.

Other information such as the right to training granted by the employer, the duration of the paid leave to which the worker is entitled or the formal conditions and periods of notice shall be provided individually to the worker in the form of a document within one month from the first working day.

Workers posted or sent to a third country shall also receive additional information specific to their situation before they leave.

Probationary period, parallel employment

Member States shall ensure that, where an employment relationship is subject to a probationary period as defined in national law or practice, that period shall not exceed six months. Member States may, on an exceptional basis, provide for longer probationary periods where justified by the nature of the employment or in the interest of the worker.

In the case of fixed-term employment relationships, Member States shall ensure that the length of such a probationary period is proportionate to the expected duration of the contract and the nature of the work. In the case of the renewal of a contract for the same function and tasks, the employment relationship shall not be subject to a new probationary period.

Member States shall ensure that an employer neither prohibits a worker from taking up employment with other employers, outside the work schedule established with that employer, nor subjects a worker to adverse treatment for doing so.

Minimum predictability of work

Member States shall ensure that where a worker's work pattern is entirely or mostly unpredictable the worker shall not be required to work by the employer unless both of the following conditions are fulfilled: (i) the work takes place within predetermined reference hours and days; (ii) the worker is informed by his or her employer of a work assignment within a reasonable notice period established in accordance with national law, collective agreements or practice.

Where one or both of the requirements is not fulfilled, a worker shall have the right to refuse a work assignment without adverse consequences.

The worker shall be protected against loss of income resulting from the late cancellation of an agreed work assignment by means of adequate compensation.

Additional measures for on-demand contracts

Member States which allow the use of on-demand contracts or similar employment contracts shall take measures to avoid abusive practices, such as:

- the limitation of the use and duration of on-demand employment contracts or similar contracts;

- the rebuttable presumption of the existence of an employment relationship with a guaranteed amount of paid hours based on hours worked in a preceding reference period.

Mandatory training

Where an employer is required by national or Union law or collective agreements to provide training to a worker to carry out work for which they are employed, such training shall be provided free of charge, be considered as working time and be organised, as far as possible, during working hours.

Documents
2019/02/19
   EP - Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations
2019/02/15
   CSL - Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
2018/10/26
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the report by Enrique CALVET CHAMBON (ALDE, ES) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union.

The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows.

Objective : the Directive shall establish minimum rights that apply to every worker in the Union. Member States shall ensure that all the persons to which this Directive applies can make effective use of those minimum rights within the framework of national law or practice, including collective agreements.

The objectives of the Directive shall be in line with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Social Charter and shall contribute to the implementation of several of the principles set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights, in particular principles 5 (secure and adaptable employment) and 7 (information about employment conditions and protection in case of dismissals)

Self-employed workers who do not meet the criteria set out in the Directive shall be excluded from the scope.

Information on the employment relationship : workers shall have the right to be informed in writing (on paper or in electronic form) of their rights and obligations resulting from the employment relationship, as soon as they take up their duties , regardless of the type of employment contract . The basic information shall be provided in writing to them no later than the first day of the employment relationship. It shall be possible to extend this deadline by a maximum of 7 days for micro enterprises.

Members specified that this information shall also include:

the full names and addresses of the parties to the employment relationship; the measures in place to enable the worker to travel to the site, where the employee works in different places; in the case of temporary agency workers, the name of the user undertaking; any training entitlement that the employer is required to provide pursuant to Union or national law and relevant collective agreements; the method for determining such notice periods as well as the formal requirements for the notice of termination and the deadline for bringing an action contesting dismissal; any other component elements indicated separately such as bonuses, overtime payments, payments in kind and other entitlements; the length of the worker’s standard working day or week , and, where applicable, the arrangements for working outside the standard working day or week, including arrangements for shift changes and overtime, and reasonable advance notice of, and remuneration for, such work; the principle that the work schedule is variable, the number of guaranteed paid hours and the remuneration for work performed in addition to those guaranteed hours; the deadline for the employer to cancel that work assignment after the worker has accepted it; the contact details of the workers’ or their trade unions’ representatives; proof of registration with a social security institution where this is the employer's responsibility.

Trainees shall have access to all necessary information about their training and work plan.

Workers posted or sent abroad shall also receive additional information specific to their situation before they leave.

Probation period : this period shall not exceed six months. In the case of fixed-term contracts of less than 12 months, the probationary period shall not exceed 25% of the expected duration of the contract . In the case of the renewal of a contract, the employment relationship shall not be subject to a new probationary period.

Exceptionally, and after consultation with the social partners, Member States may provide for longer probationary periods not exceeding 9 months where the nature of the job justifies it, for example for managerial posts. Workers should enjoy their rights during this period.

Member States may provide for probationary periods to be extended , subject to the initial agreement between the worker and the employer, where the worker has been continuously absent from work due to a long illness or extended leave, in order for both the employer and the worker to verify if the work matches their respective expectations and requirements. Under no circumstances shall it be possible to extend a probationary period unilaterally.

Employment with other employers : employers shall not prohibit, attempt to prevent, sanction or penalise workers from working for other employers for this reason.

Predictability : Members proposed introducing measures to ensure greater predictability in employment contracts and relationships. Thus, Member States may prohibit any employment relationship that does not provide for a predetermined minimum volume of guaranteed paid hours before the beginning of the employment relationship.

Under the amended text, Member States shall:

ensure that the principle of equal pay and working conditions applies to all workers, regardless of their employment status; implement the necessary measures to protect all workers, regardless of the type and duration of their employment relationship; allow trade unions to seek representative actions to protect the collective interests of workers; ensure that workers have access to social protection , regardless of the type of employment relationship; ensure that workers in variable work schedules and variable reference hours/days have access to safety and health protection ; ensure that the introduction of ‘ zero hour’ or similar contracts is stopped; ensure that effective and adequate inspections are carried out to monitor and enforce the implementation of this Directive by national bodies or by social partners; provide effective mechanisms for workers to lodge complaints in the event of violations of their rights.

Lastly, Member States shall involve the social partners in the implementation of the Directive, in accordance with their national legislation and practices.

Documents
2018/10/18
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2018/10/18
   EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
2018/10/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/09/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/07/05
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Documents
2018/07/04
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/06/28
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/06/28
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/06/28
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/06/21
   CSL - Council Meeting
2018/05/29
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/05/14
   FR_ASSEMBLY - Contribution
Documents
2018/05/14
   RO_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2018/04/10
   AT_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2018/03/15
   EP - Committee Opinion
2018/03/07
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2018/03/05
   SE_PARLIAMENT - Reasoned opinion
Documents
2018/02/21
   EP - Responsible Committee
2018/01/24
   EP - Committee Opinion
2018/01/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2017/12/21
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2017/12/21
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2017/12/21
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to improve working conditions by promoting more secure and predictable employment while ensuring labour market adaptability.

PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure on an equal footing with the Council

BACKGROUND: the evaluation of Directive 91/533/EEC on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship ("Written Statement Directive") has highlighted weaknesses in the scope of the Directive and indicated how its effectiveness could be improved.

This Directive no longer corresponds to the evolution of the labour market, in particular as regards the new "non-standard" forms of employment which have appeared in the last ten years.

Since 2014, more than five million jobs have been created, of which almost 20% in new forms of employment. The adaptability of new forms of employment to changes in the economic context has enabled new business models to develop, including in the collaborative economy, and has offered entry into the labour market to people who previously would have been excluded.

In response some Member States have put in place new regulations and national social partners have developed new collective agreements, leading to an increasingly diverse regulatory system across the EU.

This initiative is one of Commission's key actions to follow up on the European Pillar of Social Rights , jointly proclaimed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission at the Social Summit for Fair Jobs and Growth in Gothenburg on 17 November 2017. It also responds to the resolution of the European Parliament of 19 January 2017 requesting a framework Directive on decent working conditions in all forms of employment, and of 4 July 2017 on working conditions and precarious employment, calling for a revision of the 1991 Directive to take account of new forms of employment.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred combination of measures shows that a substantial improvement of working and living conditions is expected. Most notably, at least 2-3 million non-standard workers will enter into the scope of the Directive. Enhanced predictability for some 4-7 million workers should have a positive impact on work-life balance and health. Some 14 million workers might request a new form of work.

Lack of exclusivity clauses will allow some 90 000-360 000 on-demand workers to seek additional work and earn EUR 355-1 424 million per year extra.

Non-quantified benefits for employers include higher retention and loyalty, improved worker relations, fewer complaints and court cases, better resource planning, contributing to an overall increase in productivity.

CONTENT: the proposed Directive aims to replace the 1991 Written Statement Directive with a new instrument that ensures transparency about working conditions for all workers and defines new substantive rights to improve predictability and security of working conditions, particularly for those in precarious employment.

The proposal:

extends the scope of the Directive to forms of employment which are today often excluded , such as domestic work, casual workers (for instance those carrying out on-demand or intermittent work), short-term employees, domestic workers, platform workers or voucher-based workers. Member States could decide to exclude very short-term assignments of less than 8 hours per month from the scope of the Directive; provides that workers will receive up-to-date and detailed information (paper or electronic) from their first day of work. This information will cover: (i) probation (if any); (ii) training provided by employer; (iii) arrangements and remuneration for overtime; (iv) information on working time for workers on very variable schedules; (v) social security institution where contributions are paid; establishes minimum rights that apply to all workers in the Union : (i) limit the length of probationary periods to 6 months, unless longer is objectively justified; (ii) right to work for other employers, with a ban on exclusivity clauses and restrictions on incompatibility clauses; (iii) right to predictability of work: workers with variable working schedules determined by the employer (i.e. on-demand work) should know in advance when they can be requested to work; (iv) possibility to request a more stable form of employment and to receive a justified written reply (within 1 month; for SME's within 3 months and orally for repeated requests); (v) right to cost-free mandatory training; introduces two alternative procedures for addressing missing information : positive presumptions (if no relevant information supplied, no probation, permanent and/or full time employment relationship); administrative procedure to issue injunction to employer to supply missing information.

The proposal also introduces provisions based on existing social acquis on compliance, right to redress, prevention of adverse treatment, burden of proof on dismissal, and penalties are introduced.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0355/2018 - Enrique Calvet Chambon - Décision d'engager des négociations interinstitutionnelles 15/11/2018 12:12:45.000

2018/11/15 Outcome: +: 398, -: 208, 0: 13
FR IT ES PT EL BE IE FI LU CY DE MT LT EE RO NL LV DK AT BG ?? HR SI SK GB HU CZ SE PL
Total
65
55
44
19
16
18
8
10
5
5
85
5
8
4
26
23
4
12
16
13
1
10
7
12
58
16
18
18
37
icon: S&D S&D
163

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Czechia S&D

3

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Portugal ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Germany ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Hungary NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Italy ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
167
3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Malta PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Austria PPE

For (1)

4
4

United Kingdom PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0355/2018 - Enrique Calvet Chambon - Vote procédural 16/04/2019 12:37:09.000

2019/04/16 Outcome: -: 487, +: 157, 0: 7
EL CY IE FI EE SE LT LU LV MT CZ DK SI HR FR HU BG AT NL PT SK BE ES GB RO PL IT DE
Total
11
1
8
9
5
18
9
6
8
6
19
11
7
10
69
17
13
17
24
18
12
21
52
57
30
46
55
92
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1
4

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

Hungary NI

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Romania ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
4
icon: S&D S&D
161

Finland S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Czechia S&D

Against (2)

4
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2
icon: PPE PPE
191

Greece PPE

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0355/2018 - Enrique Calvet Chambon - Am 134 16/04/2019 12:37:30.000

2019/04/16 Outcome: +: 466, -: 145, 0: 37
FR DE IT PL ES RO BG PT BE SK FI LT HR NL MT LV DK AT HU LU IE CZ SI EE SE CY EL GB
Total
69
93
55
45
52
30
13
18
21
12
10
9
9
24
6
8
11
16
16
6
8
20
6
6
18
1
10
56
icon: S&D S&D
163

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
190

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (2)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

France Verts/ALE

6

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

A8-0355/2018 - Enrique Calvet Chambon - Vote procédural

2019/04/16 Outcome: -: 487, +: 157, 0: 7
EL CY ?? IE FI EE LT LU SE LV MT CZ DK SI HR FR HU BG AT NL PT SK BE ES GB RO PL IT DE
Total
11
1
2
8
9
5
9
6
17
8
6
19
11
7
10
69
17
13
17
24
18
12
21
50
56
30
46
54
92
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1
4

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

Hungary NI

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Sweden ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Romania ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
4
icon: S&D S&D
161

Finland S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Czechia S&D

Against (2)

4
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2
icon: PPE PPE
191

Greece PPE

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0355/2018 - Enrique Calvet Chambon - Am 134

2019/04/16 Outcome: +: 466, -: 145, 0: 37
FR DE IT PL ES RO BG PT BE SK FI LT HR NL MT LV DK AT HU LU IE CZ SI EE SE ?? CY EL GB
Total
69
93
54
45
50
30
13
18
21
12
10
9
9
24
6
8
11
16
16
6
8
20
6
6
17
2
1
10
55
icon: S&D S&D
163

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
190

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (2)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

France Verts/ALE

6

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
AmendmentsDossier
1146 2017/0355(COD)
2018/06/28 EMPL 815 amendments...