BETA


2017/2070(INI) Implementation of the common commercial policy. Annual report

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA SAÏFI Tokia (icon: PPE PPE) KIRTON-DARLING Jude (icon: S&D S&D), ZAHRADIL Jan (icon: ECR ECR), CHARANZOVÁ Dita (icon: ALDE ALDE), BUCHNER Klaus (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion DEVE FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian (icon: S&D S&D) Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2018/11/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/05/30
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/05/30
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 499 votes to 91, with 54 abstentions, a resolution on the annual report on the implementation of the common commercial policy.

Members recalled that the common commercial policy comprises a body of trade agreements and legislative measures to safeguard the Union’s offensive and defensive trade interests. The Union is the world’s leading commercial power and the biggest single market in the world, and it is also the world's leading exporter of goods and services, sustaining 31 million jobs in Europe, 67% more than in the mid-1990s.

Changing context : Parliament pointed out that the international context has changed profoundly since the Trade for All strategy was published in 2015 and that new trade challenges and concrete tasks now need to be addressed. It is concerned to see the rise of some protectionist practices that are incompatible with WTO rules, around the world and reiterated support for an open, fair, balanced, sustainable, and rules-based trading system.

With regard to the growing economic importance of Asia and of the USA’s gradual withdrawal on the trade front, generating uncertainty for trade internationally, the Commission is called on to adapt its trade policy to address these developments and to be more responsive and responsible, while at the same time establishing a longer-term strategy.

The United Kingdom’s departure from the EU will have consequences for internal and external trade and called on the Commission to take immediate steps to anticipate the impact of Brexit on the Union’s trade policy and to present in a timely manner an impact assessment that includes different options for future trade relations so as to ensure continuity in the implementation of EU trade policy and relations with third countries and also ways of finding a solution as regards common commitments in the WTO.

Parliament stressed that reciprocity must be a pillar of Union trade policy while taking into account the need for asymmetries with developing countries when it is relevant and preferential treatment provisions for least-developed nations.

State of play of the Union's trade negotiation agenda : stressing the paramount political and economic importance of the multilateral system, Parliament called on the Union to be a proponent in the definition of modernised multilateral rules. It called for renewed efforts to advance negotiations on the Comprehensive Investment Agreement with China.

Members considered that, in the framework of the Union’s ongoing and forthcoming bilateral negotiations, EU rules and standards must be secured, preventing threats to the EU’s social model and the environment, and that public services, including services of general interest and services of general economic interest, as well as audiovisual services, must be excluded.

Recalling the need to ensure that EU investors abroad are protected, Parliament called on the Commission to pursue its work on the new multilateral system for ruling on investment disputes , which must be based, inter alia , on a guarantee of states’ right to regulate and on transparency, and provide for an appeal mechanism, strict rules on conflict of interest and a code of conduct.

Cross-cutting measures to implement a trade policy that benefits everyone : Members called for trade policy implementation to become an integral component of the Union’s trade strategy. They called on the Commission to take stock of the human and financial resources currently available, with a view to improving the preparation of trade agreements for adoption by the co-legislators and the way that trade policy is implemented, and asked that a special trade policy implementation monitoring and continuous evaluation service be set up within the Commission, reporting also to Parliament.

Members welcomed the publication by the Commission of the first report on implementation of FTAs and asked the Commission to continue publishing the report annually. They welcomed the announced introduction of implementation roadmaps for all trade agreements and called on the Commission to involve all relevant stakeholders.

Specific Common Commercial Policy provisions for SMEs : Parliament called on Commission to evaluate the entire toolkit for SMEs, with a view to developing a more integrated overall approach and a real SME internationalisation strategy, supporting them in becoming exporters. Members asked for more legal and administrative support to be made available for SMEs thinking of exporting to foreign markets.

Public procurement market access and of the protection of geographical indications : Members noted that the protection of geographical indications is one of the Union’s offensive points in trade agreement negotiations.

The report on implementation of FTAs showed that certain partners are not complying with provisions on the protection of geographical indications. Given that the Union’s public procurement markets are the most open in the world, Members are concerned at certain partners’ non-compliance with EU FTAs’ provisions on public procurement market access, to the detriment of EU companies, and at the very limited access to public procurement markets in certain third countries. The Commission is asked to work to secure greater access to third countries’ public procurement markets.

Promotion of EU values : Parliament recalled that the common commercial policy must contribute to the promotion of the values for which the Union stands and to the pursuit of the aims listed in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, including the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights, as well as fundamental rights and freedoms, equality, respect for human dignity and the protection of the environment and of social rights. It also reaffirmed their support for the inclusion in all future trade agreements of ambitious provisions on combating corruption within the Union's exclusive competence.

Transparency and access to information : Members took note of the Commission’s work on transparency and called on the Commission to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible, fully respecting best practice as established in other negotiations.

Lastly, they called on the Commission and Member States to develop a proper strategy for communication about trade policy and about each agreement and to publish all negotiating mandates.

Documents
2018/05/30
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/05/29
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/05/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tokia SAÏFI (EPP, FR) on the annual report on the implementation of the common commercial policy.

As a reminder, the common commercial policy comprises a body of trade agreements and legislative measures to safeguard the Union’s offensive and defensive trade interests. The Union is the world’s leading commercial power and the biggest single market in the world, and it is also the world's leading exporter of goods and services, sustaining 31 million jobs in Europe, 67% more than in the mid-1990s.

Changing context : Members pointed out that the international context has changed profoundly since the Trade for All strategy was published in 2015 and that new trade challenges and concrete tasks now need to be addressed. They are concerned to see the rise of some protectionist practices that are incompatible with WTO rules, around the world and reiterated support for an open, fair, balanced, sustainable, and rules-based trading system.

They noted the growing economic importance of Asia and of the USA’s gradual withdrawal on the trade front, generating uncertainty for trade internationally. The Commission is called on to adapt its trade policy to address these developments and to be more responsive and responsible, while at the same time establishing a longer-term strategy.

The report emphasised that the United Kingdom’s departure from the EU will have consequences for internal and external trade and called on the Commission to take immediate steps to anticipate the impact of Brexit on the Union’s trade policy and to present in a timely manner an impact assessment that includes different options for future trade relations so as to ensure continuity in the implementation of EU trade policy and relations with third countries and also ways of finding a solution as regards common commitments in the WTO.

The report stressed that reciprocity must be a pillar of Union trade policy while taking into account the need for asymmetries with developing countries when it is relevant and preferential treatment provisions for least-developed nations.

Cross-cutting measures to implement a trade policy that benefits everyone : Members called for trade policy implementation to become an integral component of the Union’s trade strategy. They called on the Commission to take stock of the human and financial resources currently available, with a view to improving the preparation of trade agreements for adoption by the co-legislators and the way that trade policy is implemented, and asked that a special trade policy implementation monitoring and continuous evaluation service be set up within the Commission, reporting also to Parliament.

Commission’s first Report on Implementation of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) : while welcoming the publication by the Commission of the first report on implementation of FTAs, Members asked the Commission to continue publishing the report annually. It insisted that the Commission should conduct more in-depth comprehensive studies on the implementation of the Union's free trade agreements.

Members welcomed the announced introduction of implementation roadmaps for all trade agreements and called on the Commission to set out the intended objectives and specific criteria on which to base a clear evaluation, such as the state of progress on the removal of non-tariff barriers, the utilisation rate of preferences and of quotas, or the situation with regard to regulatory cooperation and the progress in terms of trade and sustainable development. They expect the implementation roadmaps to be transmitted to Parliament in parallel with the official referral and asked that the state of progress with the roadmaps be incorporated into the annual report on implementation of FTAs.

Specific Common Commercial Policy provisions for SMEs : the report called on Commission to evaluate the entire toolkit for SMEs, with a view to developing a more integrated overall approach and a real SME internationalisation strategy, supporting them in becoming exporters. Members asked for more legal and administrative support to be made available for SMEs thinking of exporting to foreign markets.

Public procurement market access and of the protection of geographical indications : Members noted that the protection of geographical indications is one of the Union’s offensive points in trade agreement negotiations.

The report on implementation of FTAs showed that certain partners are not complying with provisions on the protection of geographical indications. Given that the Union’s public procurement markets are the most open in the world, Members are concerned at certain partners’ non-compliance with EU FTAs’ provisions on public procurement market access, to the detriment of EU companies, and at the very limited access to public procurement markets in certain third countries. The Commission is asked to work to secure greater access to third countries’ public procurement markets.

Promotion of EU values : Members recalled that the common commercial policy must contribute to the promotion of the values for which the Union stands and to the pursuit of the aims listed in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, including the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights, as well as fundamental rights and freedoms, equality, respect for human dignity and the protection of the environment and of social rights. They also reaffirmed their support for the inclusion in all future trade agreements of ambitious provisions on combating corruption within the Union's exclusive competence.

Transparency and access to information : Members took note of the Commission’s work on transparency and called on the Commission to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible, fully respecting best practice as established in other negotiations.

Lastly, they called on the Commission and Member States to develop a proper strategy for communication about trade policy and about each agreement and to publish all negotiating mandates.

Documents
2018/04/24
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/02/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/02/01
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/12/20
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/09/04
   EP - FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2017/05/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2017/02/27
   EP - SAÏFI Tokia (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 5 30/05/2018 13:39:30.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 347, +: 287, 0: 25
IT SE ES DE CY PT IE ?? SI EL MT DK LU FR AT FI EE SK RO LV HU HR LT BG CZ BE NL GB PL
Total
64
19
48
83
5
20
10
1
3
16
6
7
5
71
18
11
5
10
28
8
14
11
10
14
16
19
26
66
44
icon: S&D S&D
169

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
178

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Greece PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 6/1 30/05/2018 13:39:42.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 366, +: 276, 0: 15
IT DE AT ES SE CY PT ?? SI IE EL MT LU DK HU EE FI LV SK HR BG LT RO CZ BE GB NL FR PL
Total
64
81
17
47
19
5
20
1
3
10
16
6
5
7
15
5
12
8
11
11
14
9
26
17
20
66
26
71
44
icon: S&D S&D
167

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
178

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 8 30/05/2018 13:40:34.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 526, +: 131, 0: 10
EL ?? IE CY SI SE DK LU EE LT FI LV MT AT HU HR SK BG PT CZ BE NL ES IT RO DE FR PL GB
Total
15
1
10
5
3
19
7
3
5
10
12
8
6
18
15
11
11
14
21
18
19
26
48
64
28
86
71
45
67
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: ENF ENF
33

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Germany ECR

For (1)

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Germany ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
170

Greece S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
182

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 9 30/05/2018 13:40:59.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 495, +: 149, 0: 14
EL CY SI ?? IE LU SE MT AT DK EE FI LV HU LT HR SK CZ BG FR BE PT NL GB ES RO PL IT DE
Total
15
5
3
1
10
4
19
6
17
7
5
12
8
14
10
11
10
18
14
70
19
21
26
64
48
27
45
65
83
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Germany ECR

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
169

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
180

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3
4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 2 30/05/2018 13:41:24.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 386, +: 266, 0: 9
ES EL DE CY SI FI IE IT LU DK ?? SE LV AT PT RO EE SK MT HR HU LT BG CZ BE NL GB FR PL
Total
48
15
86
5
3
12
10
65
4
7
1
19
8
18
21
27
5
10
6
11
14
10
14
17
18
25
66
70
45
icon: S&D S&D
169

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Croatia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
18

Germany NI

2

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Italy ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
180

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - § 16 30/05/2018 13:41:35.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 542, -: 102, 0: 14
DE FR IT ES RO PT AT BE CZ SE NL HU BG IE HR LT LV FI MT EE EL CY LU SK DK SI ?? PL GB
Total
85
69
64
48
27
21
18
20
18
16
26
15
14
10
11
10
7
11
6
5
15
5
4
10
7
3
1
45
66
icon: PPE PPE
182

Sweden PPE

For (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
168