BETA


2017/2070(INI) Implementation of the common commercial policy. Annual report

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA SAÏFI Tokia (icon: PPE PPE) KIRTON-DARLING Jude (icon: S&D S&D), ZAHRADIL Jan (icon: ECR ECR), CHARANZOVÁ Dita (icon: ALDE ALDE), BUCHNER Klaus (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion DEVE FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian (icon: S&D S&D) Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2018/11/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/05/30
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/05/30
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 499 votes to 91, with 54 abstentions, a resolution on the annual report on the implementation of the common commercial policy.

Members recalled that the common commercial policy comprises a body of trade agreements and legislative measures to safeguard the Union’s offensive and defensive trade interests. The Union is the world’s leading commercial power and the biggest single market in the world, and it is also the world's leading exporter of goods and services, sustaining 31 million jobs in Europe, 67% more than in the mid-1990s.

Changing context : Parliament pointed out that the international context has changed profoundly since the Trade for All strategy was published in 2015 and that new trade challenges and concrete tasks now need to be addressed. It is concerned to see the rise of some protectionist practices that are incompatible with WTO rules, around the world and reiterated support for an open, fair, balanced, sustainable, and rules-based trading system.

With regard to the growing economic importance of Asia and of the USA’s gradual withdrawal on the trade front, generating uncertainty for trade internationally, the Commission is called on to adapt its trade policy to address these developments and to be more responsive and responsible, while at the same time establishing a longer-term strategy.

The United Kingdom’s departure from the EU will have consequences for internal and external trade and called on the Commission to take immediate steps to anticipate the impact of Brexit on the Union’s trade policy and to present in a timely manner an impact assessment that includes different options for future trade relations so as to ensure continuity in the implementation of EU trade policy and relations with third countries and also ways of finding a solution as regards common commitments in the WTO.

Parliament stressed that reciprocity must be a pillar of Union trade policy while taking into account the need for asymmetries with developing countries when it is relevant and preferential treatment provisions for least-developed nations.

State of play of the Union's trade negotiation agenda : stressing the paramount political and economic importance of the multilateral system, Parliament called on the Union to be a proponent in the definition of modernised multilateral rules. It called for renewed efforts to advance negotiations on the Comprehensive Investment Agreement with China.

Members considered that, in the framework of the Union’s ongoing and forthcoming bilateral negotiations, EU rules and standards must be secured, preventing threats to the EU’s social model and the environment, and that public services, including services of general interest and services of general economic interest, as well as audiovisual services, must be excluded.

Recalling the need to ensure that EU investors abroad are protected, Parliament called on the Commission to pursue its work on the new multilateral system for ruling on investment disputes , which must be based, inter alia , on a guarantee of states’ right to regulate and on transparency, and provide for an appeal mechanism, strict rules on conflict of interest and a code of conduct.

Cross-cutting measures to implement a trade policy that benefits everyone : Members called for trade policy implementation to become an integral component of the Union’s trade strategy. They called on the Commission to take stock of the human and financial resources currently available, with a view to improving the preparation of trade agreements for adoption by the co-legislators and the way that trade policy is implemented, and asked that a special trade policy implementation monitoring and continuous evaluation service be set up within the Commission, reporting also to Parliament.

Members welcomed the publication by the Commission of the first report on implementation of FTAs and asked the Commission to continue publishing the report annually. They welcomed the announced introduction of implementation roadmaps for all trade agreements and called on the Commission to involve all relevant stakeholders.

Specific Common Commercial Policy provisions for SMEs : Parliament called on Commission to evaluate the entire toolkit for SMEs, with a view to developing a more integrated overall approach and a real SME internationalisation strategy, supporting them in becoming exporters. Members asked for more legal and administrative support to be made available for SMEs thinking of exporting to foreign markets.

Public procurement market access and of the protection of geographical indications : Members noted that the protection of geographical indications is one of the Union’s offensive points in trade agreement negotiations.

The report on implementation of FTAs showed that certain partners are not complying with provisions on the protection of geographical indications. Given that the Union’s public procurement markets are the most open in the world, Members are concerned at certain partners’ non-compliance with EU FTAs’ provisions on public procurement market access, to the detriment of EU companies, and at the very limited access to public procurement markets in certain third countries. The Commission is asked to work to secure greater access to third countries’ public procurement markets.

Promotion of EU values : Parliament recalled that the common commercial policy must contribute to the promotion of the values for which the Union stands and to the pursuit of the aims listed in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, including the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights, as well as fundamental rights and freedoms, equality, respect for human dignity and the protection of the environment and of social rights. It also reaffirmed their support for the inclusion in all future trade agreements of ambitious provisions on combating corruption within the Union's exclusive competence.

Transparency and access to information : Members took note of the Commission’s work on transparency and called on the Commission to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible, fully respecting best practice as established in other negotiations.

Lastly, they called on the Commission and Member States to develop a proper strategy for communication about trade policy and about each agreement and to publish all negotiating mandates.

Documents
2018/05/30
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/05/29
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/05/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tokia SAÏFI (EPP, FR) on the annual report on the implementation of the common commercial policy.

As a reminder, the common commercial policy comprises a body of trade agreements and legislative measures to safeguard the Union’s offensive and defensive trade interests. The Union is the world’s leading commercial power and the biggest single market in the world, and it is also the world's leading exporter of goods and services, sustaining 31 million jobs in Europe, 67% more than in the mid-1990s.

Changing context : Members pointed out that the international context has changed profoundly since the Trade for All strategy was published in 2015 and that new trade challenges and concrete tasks now need to be addressed. They are concerned to see the rise of some protectionist practices that are incompatible with WTO rules, around the world and reiterated support for an open, fair, balanced, sustainable, and rules-based trading system.

They noted the growing economic importance of Asia and of the USA’s gradual withdrawal on the trade front, generating uncertainty for trade internationally. The Commission is called on to adapt its trade policy to address these developments and to be more responsive and responsible, while at the same time establishing a longer-term strategy.

The report emphasised that the United Kingdom’s departure from the EU will have consequences for internal and external trade and called on the Commission to take immediate steps to anticipate the impact of Brexit on the Union’s trade policy and to present in a timely manner an impact assessment that includes different options for future trade relations so as to ensure continuity in the implementation of EU trade policy and relations with third countries and also ways of finding a solution as regards common commitments in the WTO.

The report stressed that reciprocity must be a pillar of Union trade policy while taking into account the need for asymmetries with developing countries when it is relevant and preferential treatment provisions for least-developed nations.

Cross-cutting measures to implement a trade policy that benefits everyone : Members called for trade policy implementation to become an integral component of the Union’s trade strategy. They called on the Commission to take stock of the human and financial resources currently available, with a view to improving the preparation of trade agreements for adoption by the co-legislators and the way that trade policy is implemented, and asked that a special trade policy implementation monitoring and continuous evaluation service be set up within the Commission, reporting also to Parliament.

Commission’s first Report on Implementation of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) : while welcoming the publication by the Commission of the first report on implementation of FTAs, Members asked the Commission to continue publishing the report annually. It insisted that the Commission should conduct more in-depth comprehensive studies on the implementation of the Union's free trade agreements.

Members welcomed the announced introduction of implementation roadmaps for all trade agreements and called on the Commission to set out the intended objectives and specific criteria on which to base a clear evaluation, such as the state of progress on the removal of non-tariff barriers, the utilisation rate of preferences and of quotas, or the situation with regard to regulatory cooperation and the progress in terms of trade and sustainable development. They expect the implementation roadmaps to be transmitted to Parliament in parallel with the official referral and asked that the state of progress with the roadmaps be incorporated into the annual report on implementation of FTAs.

Specific Common Commercial Policy provisions for SMEs : the report called on Commission to evaluate the entire toolkit for SMEs, with a view to developing a more integrated overall approach and a real SME internationalisation strategy, supporting them in becoming exporters. Members asked for more legal and administrative support to be made available for SMEs thinking of exporting to foreign markets.

Public procurement market access and of the protection of geographical indications : Members noted that the protection of geographical indications is one of the Union’s offensive points in trade agreement negotiations.

The report on implementation of FTAs showed that certain partners are not complying with provisions on the protection of geographical indications. Given that the Union’s public procurement markets are the most open in the world, Members are concerned at certain partners’ non-compliance with EU FTAs’ provisions on public procurement market access, to the detriment of EU companies, and at the very limited access to public procurement markets in certain third countries. The Commission is asked to work to secure greater access to third countries’ public procurement markets.

Promotion of EU values : Members recalled that the common commercial policy must contribute to the promotion of the values for which the Union stands and to the pursuit of the aims listed in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, including the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights, as well as fundamental rights and freedoms, equality, respect for human dignity and the protection of the environment and of social rights. They also reaffirmed their support for the inclusion in all future trade agreements of ambitious provisions on combating corruption within the Union's exclusive competence.

Transparency and access to information : Members took note of the Commission’s work on transparency and called on the Commission to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible, fully respecting best practice as established in other negotiations.

Lastly, they called on the Commission and Member States to develop a proper strategy for communication about trade policy and about each agreement and to publish all negotiating mandates.

Documents
2018/04/24
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/02/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/02/01
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/12/20
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/09/04
   EP - FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2017/05/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2017/02/27
   EP - SAÏFI Tokia (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 5 30/05/2018 13:39:30.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 347, +: 287, 0: 25
IT SE ES DE CY PT IE ?? SI EL MT DK LU FR AT FI EE SK RO LV HU HR LT BG CZ BE NL GB PL
Total
64
19
48
83
5
20
10
1
3
16
6
7
5
71
18
11
5
10
28
8
14
11
10
14
16
19
26
66
44
icon: S&D S&D
169

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
178

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Greece PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 6/1 30/05/2018 13:39:42.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 366, +: 276, 0: 15
IT DE AT ES SE CY PT ?? SI IE EL MT LU DK HU EE FI LV SK HR BG LT RO CZ BE GB NL FR PL
Total
64
81
17
47
19
5
20
1
3
10
16
6
5
7
15
5
12
8
11
11
14
9
26
17
20
66
26
71
44
icon: S&D S&D
167

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
178

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 8 30/05/2018 13:40:34.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 526, +: 131, 0: 10
EL ?? IE CY SI SE DK LU EE LT FI LV MT AT HU HR SK BG PT CZ BE NL ES IT RO DE FR PL GB
Total
15
1
10
5
3
19
7
3
5
10
12
8
6
18
15
11
11
14
21
18
19
26
48
64
28
86
71
45
67
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: ENF ENF
33

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Germany ECR

For (1)

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Germany ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
170

Greece S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
182

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 9 30/05/2018 13:40:59.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 495, +: 149, 0: 14
EL CY SI ?? IE LU SE MT AT DK EE FI LV HU LT HR SK CZ BG FR BE PT NL GB ES RO PL IT DE
Total
15
5
3
1
10
4
19
6
17
7
5
12
8
14
10
11
10
18
14
70
19
21
26
64
48
27
45
65
83
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Germany ECR

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
169

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
180

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3
4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 2 30/05/2018 13:41:24.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 386, +: 266, 0: 9
ES EL DE CY SI FI IE IT LU DK ?? SE LV AT PT RO EE SK MT HR HU LT BG CZ BE NL GB FR PL
Total
48
15
86
5
3
12
10
65
4
7
1
19
8
18
21
27
5
10
6
11
14
10
14
17
18
25
66
70
45
icon: S&D S&D
169

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Croatia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
18

Germany NI

2

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Italy ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
180

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - § 16 30/05/2018 13:41:35.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 542, -: 102, 0: 14
DE FR IT ES RO PT AT BE CZ SE NL HU BG IE HR LT LV FI MT EE EL CY LU SK DK SI ?? PL GB
Total
85
69
64
48
27
21
18
20
18
16
26
15
14
10
11
10
7
11
6
5
15
5
4
10
7
3
1
45
66
icon: PPE PPE
182

Sweden PPE

For (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
168

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Hungary S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

Against (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 14 30/05/2018 13:41:59.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 346, +: 285, 0: 30
IT SE ES EL CY AT ?? LU SI FI IE DE PT MT DK RO EE SK LV FR HR HU LT BG CZ BE GB NL PL
Total
64
19
48
15
5
17
1
3
3
12
10
86
21
6
7
27
5
10
8
69
11
14
10
14
18
20
66
26
45
icon: S&D S&D
169

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

France Verts/ALE

Against (1)

6

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
18

NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: ENF ENF
32

Austria ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Denmark ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
182

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - § 46/2 30/05/2018 13:42:15.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 476, -: 169, 0: 13
DE IT FR ES RO PT AT IE HU BE LV MT BG EL CY HR NL CZ SE SK LT LU DK FI ?? SI PL EE GB
Total
86
65
69
47
27
20
18
10
14
20
8
6
14
15
5
11
26
18
19
9
10
4
7
11
1
3
45
5
65
icon: PPE PPE
178

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Slovakia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
169

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 15 30/05/2018 13:42:27.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: -: 346, +: 296, 0: 11
IT ES DE AT EL CY PT ?? SE IE MT LU SI RO FI DK HU EE LT LV SK HR BG BE CZ NL GB FR PL
Total
62
48
85
18
13
5
21
1
19
10
6
4
2
27
11
7
15
5
10
8
9
11
14
20
18
26
62
70
45
icon: S&D S&D
164

Greece S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
180

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Am 3 30/05/2018 13:42:37.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 323, -: 323, 0: 13
IT FR ES PT EL AT CY BE LU DE IE ?? SI FI SE MT DK RO EE LT SK LV HR BG HU CZ GB NL PL
Total
63
71
48
20
15
17
5
20
4
84
10
1
3
12
19
6
7
27
5
10
10
8
11
14
15
18
64
26
45
icon: S&D S&D
169

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
32
3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Germany ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Denmark ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
179

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

4

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi - Résolution 30/05/2018 13:43:08.000 #

2018/05/30 Outcome: +: 499, -: 91, 0: 54
DE GB PL IT ES RO BE FR SE PT CZ BG FI AT NL HR HU LT SK EE MT LV DK LU IE SI CY ?? EL
Total
82
64
43
64
46
26
19
69
17
21
18
14
12
18
25
11
14
9
9
6
6
7
7
3
10
2
5
1
15
icon: PPE PPE
172

United Kingdom PPE

2

Sweden PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Greece PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
166

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Greece S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Germany ECR

3

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

6

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
AmendmentsDossier
243 2017/2070(INI)
2018/01/12 DEVE 46 amendments...
source: 616.600
2018/01/30 INTA 197 amendments...
source: 616.867

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-05-29-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/3
name
SCHOLZ Helmut
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.486
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-PR-615486_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.867
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-616867_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.228&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-615228_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2018-05-07T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0166_EN.html title: A8-0166/2018
summary
events/2
date
2018-05-07T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0166_EN.html title: A8-0166/2018
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180529&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2018-05-30T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0230_EN.html title: T8-0230/2018
summary
events/5
date
2018-05-30T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0230_EN.html title: T8-0230/2018
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0166&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0166_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0230
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0230_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia date: 2017-02-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2017-02-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian date: 2017-09-04T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2017-09-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
activities
  • date: 2017-05-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2017-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KIRTON-DARLING Jude group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2017-02-27T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
  • date: 2018-04-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2017-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KIRTON-DARLING Jude group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2017-02-27T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
  • date: 2018-05-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0166&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0166/2018 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2018-05-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180529&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-05-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31118&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0230 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0230/2018 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2017-02-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2017-09-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2017-09-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2017-02-27T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
docs
  • date: 2017-12-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.486 title: PE615.486 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.867 title: PE616.867 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.228&secondRef=02 title: PE615.228 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-16T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=31118&j=0&l=en title: SP(2018)515 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2017-05-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-04-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-05-07T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0166&language=EN title: A8-0166/2018 summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tokia SAÏFI (EPP, FR) on the annual report on the implementation of the common commercial policy. As a reminder, the common commercial policy comprises a body of trade agreements and legislative measures to safeguard the Union’s offensive and defensive trade interests. The Union is the world’s leading commercial power and the biggest single market in the world, and it is also the world's leading exporter of goods and services, sustaining 31 million jobs in Europe, 67% more than in the mid-1990s. Changing context : Members pointed out that the international context has changed profoundly since the Trade for All strategy was published in 2015 and that new trade challenges and concrete tasks now need to be addressed. They are concerned to see the rise of some protectionist practices that are incompatible with WTO rules, around the world and reiterated support for an open, fair, balanced, sustainable, and rules-based trading system. They noted the growing economic importance of Asia and of the USA’s gradual withdrawal on the trade front, generating uncertainty for trade internationally. The Commission is called on to adapt its trade policy to address these developments and to be more responsive and responsible, while at the same time establishing a longer-term strategy. The report emphasised that the United Kingdom’s departure from the EU will have consequences for internal and external trade and called on the Commission to take immediate steps to anticipate the impact of Brexit on the Union’s trade policy and to present in a timely manner an impact assessment that includes different options for future trade relations so as to ensure continuity in the implementation of EU trade policy and relations with third countries and also ways of finding a solution as regards common commitments in the WTO. The report stressed that reciprocity must be a pillar of Union trade policy while taking into account the need for asymmetries with developing countries when it is relevant and preferential treatment provisions for least-developed nations. Cross-cutting measures to implement a trade policy that benefits everyone : Members called for trade policy implementation to become an integral component of the Union’s trade strategy. They called on the Commission to take stock of the human and financial resources currently available, with a view to improving the preparation of trade agreements for adoption by the co-legislators and the way that trade policy is implemented, and asked that a special trade policy implementation monitoring and continuous evaluation service be set up within the Commission, reporting also to Parliament. Commission’s first Report on Implementation of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) : while welcoming the publication by the Commission of the first report on implementation of FTAs, Members asked the Commission to continue publishing the report annually. It insisted that the Commission should conduct more in-depth comprehensive studies on the implementation of the Union's free trade agreements. Members welcomed the announced introduction of implementation roadmaps for all trade agreements and called on the Commission to set out the intended objectives and specific criteria on which to base a clear evaluation, such as the state of progress on the removal of non-tariff barriers, the utilisation rate of preferences and of quotas, or the situation with regard to regulatory cooperation and the progress in terms of trade and sustainable development. They expect the implementation roadmaps to be transmitted to Parliament in parallel with the official referral and asked that the state of progress with the roadmaps be incorporated into the annual report on implementation of FTAs. Specific Common Commercial Policy provisions for SMEs : the report called on Commission to evaluate the entire toolkit for SMEs, with a view to developing a more integrated overall approach and a real SME internationalisation strategy, supporting them in becoming exporters. Members asked for more legal and administrative support to be made available for SMEs thinking of exporting to foreign markets. Public procurement market access and of the protection of geographical indications : Members noted that the protection of geographical indications is one of the Union’s offensive points in trade agreement negotiations. The report on implementation of FTAs showed that certain partners are not complying with provisions on the protection of geographical indications. Given that the Union’s public procurement markets are the most open in the world, Members are concerned at certain partners’ non-compliance with EU FTAs’ provisions on public procurement market access, to the detriment of EU companies, and at the very limited access to public procurement markets in certain third countries. The Commission is asked to work to secure greater access to third countries’ public procurement markets. Promotion of EU values : Members recalled that the common commercial policy must contribute to the promotion of the values for which the Union stands and to the pursuit of the aims listed in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, including the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights, as well as fundamental rights and freedoms, equality, respect for human dignity and the protection of the environment and of social rights. They also reaffirmed their support for the inclusion in all future trade agreements of ambitious provisions on combating corruption within the Union's exclusive competence. Transparency and access to information : Members took note of the Commission’s work on transparency and called on the Commission to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible, fully respecting best practice as established in other negotiations. Lastly, they called on the Commission and Member States to develop a proper strategy for communication about trade policy and about each agreement and to publish all negotiating mandates.
  • date: 2018-05-29T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180529&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-05-30T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31118&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2018-05-30T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0230 title: T8-0230/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 499 votes to 91, with 54 abstentions, a resolution on the annual report on the implementation of the common commercial policy. Members recalled that the common commercial policy comprises a body of trade agreements and legislative measures to safeguard the Union’s offensive and defensive trade interests. The Union is the world’s leading commercial power and the biggest single market in the world, and it is also the world's leading exporter of goods and services, sustaining 31 million jobs in Europe, 67% more than in the mid-1990s. Changing context : Parliament pointed out that the international context has changed profoundly since the Trade for All strategy was published in 2015 and that new trade challenges and concrete tasks now need to be addressed. It is concerned to see the rise of some protectionist practices that are incompatible with WTO rules, around the world and reiterated support for an open, fair, balanced, sustainable, and rules-based trading system. With regard to the growing economic importance of Asia and of the USA’s gradual withdrawal on the trade front, generating uncertainty for trade internationally, the Commission is called on to adapt its trade policy to address these developments and to be more responsive and responsible, while at the same time establishing a longer-term strategy. The United Kingdom’s departure from the EU will have consequences for internal and external trade and called on the Commission to take immediate steps to anticipate the impact of Brexit on the Union’s trade policy and to present in a timely manner an impact assessment that includes different options for future trade relations so as to ensure continuity in the implementation of EU trade policy and relations with third countries and also ways of finding a solution as regards common commitments in the WTO. Parliament stressed that reciprocity must be a pillar of Union trade policy while taking into account the need for asymmetries with developing countries when it is relevant and preferential treatment provisions for least-developed nations. State of play of the Union's trade negotiation agenda : stressing the paramount political and economic importance of the multilateral system, Parliament called on the Union to be a proponent in the definition of modernised multilateral rules. It called for renewed efforts to advance negotiations on the Comprehensive Investment Agreement with China. Members considered that, in the framework of the Union’s ongoing and forthcoming bilateral negotiations, EU rules and standards must be secured, preventing threats to the EU’s social model and the environment, and that public services, including services of general interest and services of general economic interest, as well as audiovisual services, must be excluded. Recalling the need to ensure that EU investors abroad are protected, Parliament called on the Commission to pursue its work on the new multilateral system for ruling on investment disputes , which must be based, inter alia , on a guarantee of states’ right to regulate and on transparency, and provide for an appeal mechanism, strict rules on conflict of interest and a code of conduct. Cross-cutting measures to implement a trade policy that benefits everyone : Members called for trade policy implementation to become an integral component of the Union’s trade strategy. They called on the Commission to take stock of the human and financial resources currently available, with a view to improving the preparation of trade agreements for adoption by the co-legislators and the way that trade policy is implemented, and asked that a special trade policy implementation monitoring and continuous evaluation service be set up within the Commission, reporting also to Parliament. Members welcomed the publication by the Commission of the first report on implementation of FTAs and asked the Commission to continue publishing the report annually. They welcomed the announced introduction of implementation roadmaps for all trade agreements and called on the Commission to involve all relevant stakeholders. Specific Common Commercial Policy provisions for SMEs : Parliament called on Commission to evaluate the entire toolkit for SMEs, with a view to developing a more integrated overall approach and a real SME internationalisation strategy, supporting them in becoming exporters. Members asked for more legal and administrative support to be made available for SMEs thinking of exporting to foreign markets. Public procurement market access and of the protection of geographical indications : Members noted that the protection of geographical indications is one of the Union’s offensive points in trade agreement negotiations. The report on implementation of FTAs showed that certain partners are not complying with provisions on the protection of geographical indications. Given that the Union’s public procurement markets are the most open in the world, Members are concerned at certain partners’ non-compliance with EU FTAs’ provisions on public procurement market access, to the detriment of EU companies, and at the very limited access to public procurement markets in certain third countries. The Commission is asked to work to secure greater access to third countries’ public procurement markets. Promotion of EU values : Parliament recalled that the common commercial policy must contribute to the promotion of the values for which the Union stands and to the pursuit of the aims listed in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, including the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights, as well as fundamental rights and freedoms, equality, respect for human dignity and the protection of the environment and of social rights. It also reaffirmed their support for the inclusion in all future trade agreements of ambitious provisions on combating corruption within the Union's exclusive competence. Transparency and access to information : Members took note of the Commission’s work on transparency and called on the Commission to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible, fully respecting best practice as established in other negotiations. Lastly, they called on the Commission and Member States to develop a proper strategy for communication about trade policy and about each agreement and to publish all negotiating mandates.
  • date: 2018-05-30T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
INTA/8/09943
New
  • INTA/8/09943
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
New
6.20
Common commercial policy in general
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
SCHOLZ Helmut
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
BUCHNER Klaus
activities/1
date
2018-04-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2
date
2018-05-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0166&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0166/2018
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/3/date
Old
2018-03-22T00:00:00
New
2018-05-29T00:00:00
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180529&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4
date
2018-05-30T00:00:00
docs
body
EP
type
Results of vote in Parliament
committees/2/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
SCHOLZ Helmut
committees/2/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
BUCHNER Klaus
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
New
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure completed
activities/0
date
2017-05-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2017-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
activities/1/date
Old
2017-05-18T00:00:00
New
2018-03-22T00:00:00
activities/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees/2/date
2017-02-27T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
committees/2/shadows
  • group: S&D name: KIRTON-DARLING Jude
  • group: ECR name: ZAHRADIL Jan
  • group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
activities/0/committees/0/date
2017-09-04T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian
committees/0/date
2017-09-04T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian
activities/0/committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
activities/0
date
2017-05-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
INTA/8/09943
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
procedure/title
Old
Implementation of the Common Commercial Policy. Annual report
New
Implementation of the common commercial policy. Annual report
activities
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
    • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    links
    other
      procedure
      reference
      2017/2070(INI)
      title
      Implementation of the Common Commercial Policy. Annual report
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Preparatory phase in Parliament
      subtype
      Annual report
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6.20 Common commercial policy in general