BETA


2017/2128(INI) Implementation of the Plant Protection Programme Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI POC Pavel (icon: S&D S&D) MCGUINNESS Mairead (icon: PPE PPE), PROCTER John (icon: ECR ECR), HUITEMA Jan (icon: ALDE ALDE), HÄUSLING Martin (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), PEDICINI Piernicola (icon: EFDD EFDD), GODDYN Sylvie (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion AGRI JAHR Peter (icon: PPE PPE) Karin KADENBACH (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2019/03/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/09/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/09/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/09/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 529 votes to 34, with 63 abstentions, a resolution on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 on plant protection products (PPP).

Members noted that the objectives and instruments of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 , as well as its implementation, are not always sufficiently in line with European policies in the fields of agriculture, health, animal welfare, food safety, water quality, climate change, sustainable use of pesticides and maximum residue levels for pesticides in food and feed. Improvements could be made to achieve the objectives of the Regulation.

Main conclusions : while considering that the European Union is the appropriate level to pursue the regulatory strategy in the field of pesticides, Members expressed concern at the fact that the Regulation has not been effectively implemented and that, as a result, its objectives as regards agricultural production and innovation are not being achieved in practice. They highlighted the fact that, partly owing to the low degree of innovation , the number of pesticide active substances is decreasing.

While recalling the precautionary principle , Members also considered it unacceptable that the approval requirements for safeners and synergists have not yet been applied and that the negative list of co-formulants has still not been adopted, especially after the ban on POE-tallowamines in combination with glyphosate, which has highlighted the adverse effects that certain co-formulants can have.

Members are also concerned about:

the steadily increasing use and identified cases of misuse of emergency authorisations granted under Article 53 in some Member States; the incomplete harmonisation of data and testing requirements in some scientific fields; the limited public availability of information on the evaluation and authorisation procedure, as well as the limited access to information.

Highlighting that the credibility of the PPP authorisation system strongly depends on public trust in European agencies, Parliament urged the Commission to propose improvements to further enhance the transparency of the regulatory process , including on access to the data in safety studies submitted by producers as part of their applications for market authorisation of PPPs in the EU. Members recognise the need to review the procedure in order to improve evaluations, increase the independence of the authorities tasked with carrying out studies, avoid conflicts of interest and make the procedure more transparent.

According to Parliament, the system for the scientific evaluation of plant protection products should be scientifically robust, objective and based on peer-reviewed evidence, derived from an open, independent and multidisciplinary scientific approach in authorising any active substance, in line with the EU’s risk analysis principles and the precautionary principle.

Low-risk pesticides : the resolution stressed that the authorisation and promotion of low-risk and non-chemical pesticides is an essential measure to support integrated pest management with low pesticide inputs. It recognised the need for more research on these products and underlined the importance of creating an innovation-friendly regulatory framework which will allow the replacement of older chemistry by new and better crop protection products.

Recommendations : the Commission and the Member States are called on to:

ensure effective implementation of the Regulation as regards their specific roles in the approval and authorisation procedures; acknowledge that the protection of human and animal health and the environment are key objectives of the legislation, while improving agricultural production and safeguarding the competitiveness of the agricultural sector; ensure full and uniform application of the hazard cut-off criteria , following the existing harmonised guidance, and to make sure that substances are assessed for their risk only if there is evidence that they do not present hazardous (cut-off) properties, as required by the Regulation; implement the provisions on co-formulants, safeners and synergists , to establish a list of unacceptable co-formulants and rules so that safeners and synergists are tested at EU level; finalise methods to determine when certain derogations should be applied, in particular as regards ‘negligible exposure’ or ‘serious danger to plant health’; incentivise research initiatives concerning active substances , including biological low-risk substances, and PPPs within Horizon Europe and the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027; increase the overall transparency of the procedures in particular by explaining and justifying the decisions of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed.

Member States are called upon to:

improve the serious and chronic understaffing of the national competent authorities, which leads to delays at the stage of hazard identification and initial risk assessment performed by Member States; better implement the authorisation procedures at national level, in order to limit the derogations and extensions granted under Article 53 of the Regulation to actual emergency situations; ensure effective enforcement of the Regulation, especially as regards controls on the PPPs marketed in the EU and regardless of whether they have been produced in the EU or imported from third countries.

Industry is called on to provide all data and scientific studies in a uniform electronic and machine-readable format to the rapporteur Member States and the EU agencies.

Documents
2018/09/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/07/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted an own-initiative report by Pavel POC (S&D, CZ) on the implementation of the Plant Protection Products (PPP) Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.

The evaluation of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 revealed that the objectives of protecting human and animal health and the environment are not fully being achieved and that improvements could be made in order to achieve all the objectives of the Regulation.

Main conclusions : the report noted in particular that the objectives and instruments of the Regulation and its implementation are not always sufficiently in line with EU policies in the fields of agriculture, health, animal welfare, food security, water quality, climate change, sustainable use of pesticides and maximum residue levels of pesticides in food and feed.

Members recalled that the precautionary principle is clearly not being applied in the risk analysis of pesticides. They found it unacceptable that the approval requirements of safeners and synergists have not yet been applied, contrary to the Regulation. They also considered it unacceptable that the negative list of co-formulants has still not been adopted, especially after the ban on POE-tallowamines in combination with glyphosate, which has highlighted the adverse effects that certain co-formulants can have.

Members are also concerned about:

the steadily increasing use and identified cases of misuse of emergency authorisations granted under Article 53 in some Member States; the incomplete harmonisation of data and testing requirements in some scientific fields; the limited public availability of information on the evaluation and authorisation procedure, as well as the limited access to information.

The Commission is urged to propose improvements to further enhance the transparency of the regulatory process , including on access to the data in safety studies submitted by producers as part of their applications for market authorisation of PPPs in the EU. Members recognise the need to review the procedure in order to improve evaluations, increase the independence of the authorities tasked with carrying out studies, avoid conflicts of interest and make the procedure more transparent.

The report stressed that the authorisation and promotion of low-risk and non-chemical pesticides is an essential measure to support integrated pest management with low pesticide inputs. It recognised the need for more research on these products and underlined the importance of creating an innovation-friendly regulatory framework which will allow the replacement of older chemistry by new and better crop protection products.

Recommendations : the report called on the Commission and the Member States to:

ensure effective implementation of the Regulation as regards their specific roles in the approval and authorisation procedures; acknowledge that the protection of human and animal health and the environment are key objectives of the legislation, while improving agricultural production and safeguarding the competitiveness of the agricultural sector; ensure full and uniform application of the hazard cut-off criteria , following the existing harmonised guidance, and to make sure that substances are assessed for their risk only if there is evidence that they do not present hazardous (cut-off) properties, as required by the Regulation; implement the provisions on co-formulants, safeners and synergists , to establish a list of unacceptable co-formulants and rules so that safeners and synergists are tested at EU level; finalise methods to determine when certain derogations should be applied, in particular as regards ‘negligible exposure’ or ‘serious danger to plant health’; incentivise research initiatives concerning active substances , including biological low-risk substances, and PPPs within Horizon Europe and the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027; increase the overall transparency of the procedures in particular by explaining and justifying the decisions of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed.

Member States are called upon to:

improve the serious and chronic understaffing of the national competent authorities, which leads to delays at the stage of hazard identification and initial risk assessment performed by Member States; better implement the authorisation procedures at national level, in order to limit the derogations and extensions granted under Article 53 of the Regulation to actual emergency situations; ensure effective enforcement of the Regulation, especially as regards controls on the PPPs marketed in the EU and regardless of whether they have been produced in the EU or imported from third countries.

Industry is called on to provide all data and scientific studies in a uniform electronic and machine-readable format to the rapporteur Member States and the EU agencies.

Documents
2018/07/10
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/06/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/06/13
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/05/08
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/07/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2017/07/06
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2017/07/05
   EP - JAHR Peter (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2017/05/04
   EP - POC Pavel (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI

Documents

Votes

A8-0268/2018 - Pavel Poc - Am 2 13/09/2018 12:29:41.000 #

2018/09/13 Outcome: +: 360, -: 243, 0: 26
IT FR ES AT SE EL DK BE NL GB DE FI PT RO CY ?? LT CZ IE EE HU MT LU LV BG HR SI SK PL
Total
59
65
45
17
18
16
11
18
22
60
83
10
19
20
6
2
9
16
8
5
13
5
6
6
14
10
7
10
47
icon: S&D S&D
164

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
38

Italy GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
32
3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

United Kingdom NI

3

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
179

Austria PPE

Against (1)

5

Sweden PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

3

A8-0268/2018 - Pavel Poc - § 32/2 13/09/2018 12:31:14.000 #

2018/09/13 Outcome: -: 415, +: 190, 0: 16
SK SI CZ AT BG LU MT LV RO HU IE HR ?? LT CY EE FI PT SE PL BE EL DK NL ES FR DE IT GB
Total
10
7
15
16
14
6
4
6
21
13
8
10
2
9
5
6
9
19
18
46
18
16
11
22
46
64
79
59
60
icon: PPE PPE
172

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

2
3

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

1
icon: NI NI
18

Hungary NI

Against (1)

3

NI

2

Poland NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32
3

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

For (1)

4

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3
3

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
59

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2
icon: S&D S&D
161

Slovakia S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (2)

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2
3

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2

A8-0268/2018 - Pavel Poc - Am 3 13/09/2018 12:31:52.000 #

2018/09/13 Outcome: +: 317, -: 294, 0: 20
IT FR PT EL ES SE AT DE CY GB HU ?? MT IE DK BE LU LV EE FI RO SI HR SK LT BG NL CZ PL
Total
59
65
18
16
45
18
17
83
5
61
13
2
5
8
11
18
6
6
6
11
21
7
10
10
9
14
23
16
46
icon: S&D S&D
164

Cyprus S&D

2
4

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2
3

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Czechia S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
32
3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
18

France NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

4

Poland NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Romania ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3
icon: PPE PPE
175

Austria PPE

Abstain (1)

5

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

A8-0268/2018 - Pavel Poc - Am 4 13/09/2018 12:32:03.000 #

2018/09/13 Outcome: +: 311, -: 289, 0: 31
IT FR PT EL ES AT SE DE CY BE HU ?? GB MT IE DK LU LV EE FI NL HR RO SI SK LT BG CZ PL
Total
59
65
19
16
45
17
18
81
5
18
13
2
62
5
8
11
6
6
6
11
23
9
21
7
10
9
14
16
47
icon: S&D S&D
164

Cyprus S&D

2
4

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Austria ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
32

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
18

France NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

4

Poland NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3
icon: PPE PPE
175

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Croatia PPE

3

A8-0268/2018 - Pavel Poc - Am 5 13/09/2018 12:32:16.000 #

2018/09/13 Outcome: -: 440, +: 97, 0: 94
?? IE CY EL FI DK AT LV LU BE EE MT HU SI LT IT BG HR SK NL PT SE CZ RO ES PL FR GB DE
Total
2
8
5
16
11
11
17
6
6
18
6
5
13
7
9
58
14
10
10
23
19
18
16
21
45
47
66
62
80
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
32
3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany ECR

Against (1)

4
icon: NI NI
18

Poland NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Germany NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
32

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

5

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
164

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Finland S&D

2
3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

For (1)

4

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Bulgaria S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2
6

Czechia S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
177

Ireland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0268/2018 - Pavel Poc - § 42/2 13/09/2018 12:32:34.000 #

2018/09/13 Outcome: -: 399, +: 210, 0: 22
HU SK SI FR IE ?? BG LU LV AT MT LT HR RO CY EE CZ PT FI EL SE PL DK DE BE NL ES IT GB
Total
13
10
7
66
8
2
14
6
6
17
5
8
10
21
5
6
16
19
11
16
18
47
11
81
18
23
45
59
61
icon: PPE PPE
176
3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: ENF ENF
32
3

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
18

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

2

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL