Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE) | SARVAMAA Petri ( PPE), LIBERADZKI Bogusław ( S&D), MARIAS Notis ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | SWINBURNE Kay ( ECR) | Hugues BAYET ( S&D), Barbara KAPPEL ( ENF), Thomas MANN ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) for the financial year 2016.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2018/1403 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2016.
CONTENT: the European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the implementation of the latter’s budget for the financial year 2016.
This decision is accompanied by a resolution of the European Parliament containing the observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016 ( please refer to the summary dated 18.4.2018 ).
In this resolution, Parliament welcomed the fact that in the course of 2016, the Authority began to publish a register of staff meetings with external stakeholders and that whistleblowing rules have been successfully implemented as envisaged in the first half of 2017.
Parliament noted that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from regulatory tasks to enforcing and applying the Union law, the Authority’s budget and manpower should be reallocated internally.
It noted that, according to the Court’s report, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union might affect the Authority’s activities since many significant supervised entities are currently located there. It noted with satisfaction that the Authority is engaging proactively with national competent authorities to understand the impact of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union on the supervision of the financial markets as well as its impact on the Authority.
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2016, and to approve the closure of the accounts for the financial year in question.
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2016 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular , Parliament adopted by 578 votes to 114 with 7 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Agency’s financial statements : the final budget of the Authority for the financial year 2016 was EUR 39 398 106, representing an increase of 7.11 % compared to 2015. As a reminder, the Authority is financed by a contribution from the Union (EUR 10 203 000), contributions from national supervisory authorities of the Member States and observers (EUR 16 180 250) and fees (EUR 10 550 293). Budget and financial management : Members acknowledged that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.97 %, representing an increase of 0.33 % compared to 2015, and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 87.29 %, representing an increase of 2.75 % compared to 2015. Commitments and carryovers : 92.8% of the 2015 budget credits carried forward to 2016 were paid within the year. Members observed that the carryover rate was relatively low with the exception of operational expenditure, which was at 38.09%. Carryovers are often justified by the multiannual nature of the Authority’s operational programmes, and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation. Performance : Parliament welcomed the fact that the Authority, together with the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, forms part of the Joint Committee which works to ensure cross-sector consistency and joint positions in the area of supervision of financial conglomerates and on other cross-sector issues. It has also worked on building its cooperation with the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the European Central Bank in areas of mutual interest such as market infrastructures and financial stability.
Members also made a series of observations regarding transfers, procurement, staff policy and the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits. They deplored the significant imbalance in the composition of the board of directors, the ratio being 17% of women against 83% of men. They also stressed the need to establish an independent body with sufficient budgetary resources to help whistleblowers to disclose information about possible irregularities affecting the Union's financial interests, while protecting their confidentiality.
Parliament noted that the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union might affect the Authority’s activities since many significant supervised entities are currently located there. However, the Authority is engaging proactively with national competent authorities to understand the impact of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union on the supervision of the financial markets as well as its impact on the Authority.
The resolution welcomed ESMA’s contribution to financial stability by conducting the global first EU-wide stress test for central counterparties.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Bart STAES (Greens/EFA, BE) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) for the financial year 2016.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Executive Director of the Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2016.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Authority for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Authority’s accounts.
They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Agency’s financial statements : Members noted that the final budget of the Authority for the financial year 2016 was EUR 39 398 106, representing an increase of 7.11 % compared to 2015. As a reminder, the Authority is financed by a contribution from the Union (EUR 10 203 000), contributions from national supervisory authorities of the Member States and observers (EUR 16 180 250) and fees (EUR 10 550 293). Budget and financial management : Members acknowledged that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.97 %, representing an increase of 0.33 % compared to 2015, and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 87.29 %, representing an increase of 2.75 % compared to 2015. Commitments and carryovers : 92.8% of the 2015 budget credits carried forward to 2016 were paid within the year. Members observed that the carryover rate was relatively low with the exception of operational expenditure, which was at 38.09%. Carryovers are often justified by the multiannual nature of the Authority’s operational programmes, and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation. Performance : the report welcomed the fact that the Authority, together with the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, forms part of the Joint Committee which works to ensure cross-sector consistency and joint positions in the area of supervision of financial conglomerates and on other cross-sector issues. It has also worked on building its cooperation with the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the European Central Bank in areas of mutual interest such as market infrastructures and financial stability.
Members also made a series of observations regarding transfers, procurement, staff policy and the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits.
Members noted that the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union might affect the Authority’s activities since many significant supervised entities are currently located there. However, the Authority is engaging proactively with national competent authorities to understand the impact of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union on the supervision of the financial markets as well as its impact on the Authority.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2016 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2016 of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Authority for the financial year 2016, accompanied by the Authority's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2016.
No further comments were made as regards the accounts.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2016 together with the Authority’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit focused on the annual accounts of the European Securities and Markets Authority ( ESMA ). To recall, the Authority’s task is to improve the functioning of the EU internal financial market by ensuring a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, promoting the integrity and stability of the financial systems and strengthening international supervisory coordination in order to ensure the stability and effectiveness of the financial system.
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the Authority, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2016 and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Authority’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2016 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report made a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Authority, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s comments : without calling into question its opinion, the Court draws attention to the fact that the United Kingdom (UK) notified the European Council on 29 March 2017 of its decision to withdraw from the European Union. An agreement setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal will be negotiated. The Authority’s budget is financed by 26 % from European Union funds, by 47 % through direct contributions from EU Member States and by 27 % from and fees received from supervised entities (credit-rating agencies and trade repositories). The departure of the UK might affect the Authority’s activities since the most significant supervised entities are currently located there. A future decrease of the Authority’s revenue resulting from the UK’s decision to leave the EU is possible.
The Court did not make any other particular comment on the Authority’s budgetary management.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report also contained a summary of the Authority’s key figures in 2016 :
Budget : EUR 39.4 million. Staff : 204 including officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Securities and Markets Authority ( ESMA ), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the ESMA .
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) : the Authority, which is located in Paris (FR), was set up by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council with a view to protecting the public interest by contributing to the short, medium and long-term stability and efficiency of the financial system for the economy of the European Union.
As regards the ESMA’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2016:
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 42 million; made: EUR 40 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 47 million; paid: EUR 38 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of the Securities and Market Authority .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the European Securities and Markets Authority ( ESMA ), with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, " releases " the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.
The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the ESMA .
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) : the Authority, which is located in Paris (FR), was set up by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council with a view to protecting the public interest by contributing to the short, medium and long-term stability and efficiency of the financial system for the economy of the European Union.
As regards the ESMA’s accounts , these are presented in detail in the document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for 2016:
Commitment appropriations :
available: EUR 42 million; made: EUR 40 million.
Payment appropriations :
available: EUR 47 million; paid: EUR 38 million.
For further details on expenditure, please refer to the final accounts of the Securities and Market Authority .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0155/2018
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0101/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.261
- Committee opinion: PE613.565
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.465
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0176
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0033/2018
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2017)0365
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2017)0365 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 417 06.12.2017, p. 0176 N8-0033/2018
- Committee draft report: PE613.465
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05941/2018
- Committee opinion: PE613.565
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE618.261
Votes
A8-0101/2018 - Bart Staes - résolution 18/04/2018 13:02:07.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
48 |
2017/2173(DEC)
2018/01/22
ECON
30 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph –1 (new) -1. Points to the central role played by the European System of Financial Supervision and the three European Supervisory Authorities for ensuring better oversight over the financial system in response to the financial crisis and its economic, social and human consequences;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines that, in the power to formulate Level 2 and Level 3 measures, attention should be devoted to the specific features of the various national markets and that the market participants concerned should be involved in the process of application sufficiently promptly, as well as in the individual design and implementation stages, as in the past;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines that in light of uneven supervision of consumer protection legislation across Member States, the European Supervisory Authorities shall contribute to and promote convergent supervisory practices at a high-level in the area of consumer protection and have at their disposal the appropriate resources for that task;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that the authority should devote special attention to the principle of proportionality in carrying out its mandate;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes the need to properly assess the Authority's work on regular basis in an effort to allocate and make the use of its resources more effective, transparent and credible;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from legislative tasks to enforcing and applying the Union law, the Authority’s budget and manpower should be reallocated internally; is of the opinion that a gradual increase of the means available to the European Supervisory Authorities commensurate with the increasing amount of work which they are legally mandated to deliver, while ensuring an appropriate level of prioritisation and efficiency as regards resource allocation; underlines that more resources should be deployed to control the effective enforcement of Union law and investor protection;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from legislative tasks to enforcing and applying the Union law, the Authority’s budget and manpower should be reallocated internally; believes that the Authority’s budget still has rationalisation potential; stresses, therefore, that any potential increases in the Authority’s means should be accompanied by adequate rationalisation measures and defended and explained thoroughly in a clear, detailed and understandable defence report before the European Parliament and made publically available;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from legislative tasks to enforcing and applying the Union law, the Authority’s budget and manpower should be reallocated internally; considers, however, that efforts to that end must serve to strengthen the Authority’s independence in the face of private sector pressures and allow for the growing role of its supervisory tasks;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from legislative tasks to enforcing and applying the Union law, the Authority’s budget and manpower should be reallocated internally; notes that, for the purpose of ensuring sufficient staff at the Authority for implementing its tasks, budget and resources should be allocated properly, also in the case of additional tasks, which would further ensure its credibility and independence;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that ESMA should devote more attention to making the most of the resources to carry out its legal mandate in full and should focus on proportionality in all its activities;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph –1 a (new) -1a. Underscores, in this context, the importance of the European Securities and Markets Authority for ensuring - by means of appropriate common supervision of the Single Market - financial stability, the necessary transparency and greater security for the financial market;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency not only towards Parliament and the Council, but also towards all European citizens;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Stresses the need for protection of consumers as a priority and to allocate all necessary resources for this purpose;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Notes the necessity of coordination and close cooperation with the other European Supervisory Authorities and national authorities, as well as with international organisations;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the minutes of meetings of the Board of Supervisors and of the Stakeholder Groups, which are publicly available, should be published more swiftly
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the minutes of meetings of the Board of Supervisors and of the Stakeholder Groups, which are publicly available, should be published more swiftly
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the minutes of meetings of the Board of Supervisors and of the Stakeholder Groups, which are publicly available, should be published more swiftly
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the minutes of meetings of the Board of Supervisors and of the Stakeholder Groups, which are publicly available, should be published more swiftly so that it is possible to monitor any interference with supervision by parties in positions of influence.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Insists, in the light of the Authority's assignments and the positions recently adopted by Parliament in this connection, that the Authority set up a secure channel for whistle-blowers as quickly as possible.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Is of the opinion that the Authority should establish a secure channel for whistle-blowers in the framework of its action plan for the years to come;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the conclusions of the European Court of Auditor's special report and encourages the Authority to implement them as quick as possible;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph –1 b (new) -1b. Stresses that, in carrying out its assignments, the Authority must pay detailed attention at all times to protecting consumers in the Union;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Stresses further the need to enhance democratic accountability and transparency regarding meetings with stakeholders and lobbyists and properly inform the Parliament for its activities, notes that the protection of whistle- blowers will enforce transparency, democratic accountability and public control;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors, the European Securities and Markets Authority’s transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year 2016 are legal and regular in all material aspects; welcomes that the Court's comments of 2011 and 2012 have finally been addressed;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that, in the aftermath of the financial crisis and Brexit, the European Parliament has acted as a driving force, and that ESMA has a crucial role to play in increasing the consistent application of Union law, promoting better coordination between national authorities and fostering financial stability, transparency, safer financial markets, a high degree of consumer protection and convergent supervisory practices in this area;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full and within deadline, the Authority should carefully adhere to the tasks and the mandate assigned to it by the European Parliament and the Council; points to the need for cooperation with other institutions responsible for international supervision;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full and within deadline, the Authority should carefully adhere to the tasks and the mandate assigned to it by the European Parliament and the Council, and should not seek to de facto broaden its mandate beyond those assignments; emphasises, in this respect, that the Authority needs to pay particular attention to the principle of proportionality;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full and within deadline, the Authority should carefully adhere to the tasks and the mandate assigned to it by the European Parliament and the Council, and must not seek to broaden its mandate beyond those assignments;
source: 616.548
2018/03/02
CONT
18 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Securities and Markets Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the fact that
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Expresses the need to establish an independent disclosure, advice and referral body with sufficient budgetary resources, in order to help whistle-blowers use the right channels to disclose their information on possible irregularities affecting the financial interests of the Union, while protecting their confidentiality and offering needed support and advice;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that in 2016 the Authority received six requests for access to documents pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents12 to which the Authority granted a full access in four cases while in two cases the Authority decided to grant only partial access to the documents due to protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual and to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that in 2016 the Authority received six requests for access to documents pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents12 to which the Authority granted a full access in four cases while in two cases the Authority decided to grant only partial access to the documents due to protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual and to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. asks the Authority to inform the discharge authority on ethics rules alleged and confirmed infringements, how it has dealt with these infringements, and how it will avoid them in the future;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 6 Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Takes note that the Court performed a performance audit on the supervision of Credit Rating Agencies in the Authority and published its final report in February 2016; acknowledges that the Authority set up an action plan following the audit in order to implement the Court’s recommendations; notes with satisfaction that seven
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Notes from the Court’s report that the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Notes from the Court’s report that the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union might affect the Authority’s activities since
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Observes that the
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. asks the Authority to keep volume to be carried over to the next year as low as possible;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that, on average, each member of the Authority’s staff was on sick leave for six days in 2016; observes
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that in March 2015 the Authority’s Executive Director mandated investigators to conduct an administrative inquiry following allegations of harassment made by an external IT consultant against a staff member and that the inquiry was completed in March 2016; notes
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Considers that the minutes of meetings of the Board of Supervisors and of the Stakeholder Groups, which are publicly available, should be published more swiftly, and should provide better insight into the discussions held, members’ positions and voting behaviour; believes that outreach to the general public could also be enhanced by web streaming events;
source: 618.261
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2017-06-26T00:00:00New
2017-06-25T00:00:00 |
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.465New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-613465_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.565&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-613565_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.261New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-618261_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0101&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0101_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0155New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0155_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/10828New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2017-10-05T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-10-05T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/10828
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/date |
2017-09-14T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|