2017/2186(DEC) | [ParlTrack]

Changes: 2023/08/03events.date, docs, events.docs, 2021/12/18events.docs, events, docs.docs.url, events.type, committees.shadows, 2020/01/19events.docs.url, 2019/09/04committees, 2019/07/12committees, 2019/07/06procedure.final, events, procedure.dossier_of_the_committee, activities, committees, procedure.subject, docs, links, other, commission, procedure.stage_reached, 2018/09/12activities, procedure.stage_reached

View current state | View Changes for this date

Awaiting committee decision

2017/2186(DEC) 2016 discharge: Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking - S2R Joint Undertaking

Role	Committee	Rapporteur	Shadows
Lead	CONT	HAYES Brian (EPP)	POCHE Miroslav (S&D), CZARNECKI Ryszard (ECR), DLABAJOVÁ Martina (ALDE), OMARJEE Younous (GUE/NGL), TARAND Indrek (Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (EFD), KAPPEL Barbara (ENF)
Opinion	ITRE
Opinion	TRAN	FERBER Markus (EPP)

Lead committee dossier: CONT/8/10878

Subjects

8.70.03.06 2016 discharge

Links

Activites

2017/09/13 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2017/06/19 Non-legislative basic document published
- COM(2017)0365 summary
  
  PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking - S2R. CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union. This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective. It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the S2R JU, with a view to granting discharge. Discharge procedure: the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU. The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge. The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the S2R JU. The Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking: the S2R JU, located in Brussels (BE), was set up by Council Regulation (EU) No 642/2014 and aims to contribute to the achievement of the Single European Railway Area, to a faster and less costly transition to a more attractive, user-friendly sustainable European rail system. It is set up for a period until 31.12.2024. As regards the JU’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document published by the Joint Undertaking (please refer to the annual activity report 2016 of the S2R).
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en', 'title': 'Budget'}, OETTINGER Günther

Documents

Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2017)0365

Amendments	Dossier
18	2017/2186(DEC) 2018/01/26 TRAN 10 amendments... Amendment 1 # Jens ROHDE, Pavel TELIČKA Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that, in 2016, the operational costs (Title 3) represented 87,8 % of the overall S2R JU budget including the expected un-used appropriations not required in the year (Title 4); further notes that, for the operational budget, the S2R JU attained a rate of implementation of 100 % for the commitment appropriations and a rate of payment appropriations of 86,6 % ; notes that the payment appropriations were used for the pre-financing of the grants resulting from the 2015 and 2016 calls for proposals; Amendment 10 # Evžen TOŠENOVSKÝ Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Underlines that research and innovation projects should be followed by a higher Technology Readiness Level (TRL) in the demonstration and implementation phase; stresses that the necessity of complementary financing using the relevant funding instruments is key to build a competitive railway system in the future. Amendment 2 # Jens ROHDE, Pavel TELIČKA Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the S2R JU has set up a risk management policy but has not yet performed a specific anti-fraud assessment, nor has it established an action plan for the implementation of its own anti-fraud strategy; notes also that, since only pre- financing of projects has been paid in 2016, no ex-post controls have been carried out; encourages the S2R JU to adopt, as soon as possible, an ex-post control strategy; asks the S2R JU to provide details on the risk management system, and in particular on how to avoid conflicts of interest; Amendment 3 # Jens ROHDE, Pavel TELIČKA Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Is concerned that in its procedure for the procurement services, S2R JU sets a maximum contract budget, which does not seem to be based on a cost estimation process and a reasonable market price reference system; asks the S2R JU to put in place appropriate cost estimation processes before launching procurement procedures in order to ensure the cost-effectiveness of its multi-annual service contracts, as experience shows that most of the bids received were close to the maximum budget; Amendment 4 # Maria GRAPINI Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Is concerned that in its procedure for the procurement services, S2R JU sets a maximum contract budget, which does not seem to be based on a cost estimation process and a reasonable market price reference system; asks the S2R JU to put in place appropriate cost estimation processes before launching procurement procedures; in order to prevent bottlenecks; Amendment 5 # Kateřina KONEČNÁ Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that the S2R Joint Undertaking should operate in an open and transparent manner, providing all relevant information available in a timely manner to the competent authorities, establishing a mechanism for consultation with all stakeholders using the goods and services of the railway sector, and ensuring the adequate promotion of its activities, including information and awareness-raising activities aimed at the wider public. The rules of procedure of the bodies of the S2R Joint Undertaking should be made publicly available. Amendment 6 # Kateřina KONEČNÁ Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Notes that, in order to achieve its objectives and to ensure the equitable participation of other undertakings, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and other investors, and with a view to modernising the integrated European railway sector, the S2R Joint Undertaking should provide an EU contribution to its activities through open and transparent procedures, mainly in the form of grants to members, e.g. in the form of public procurement contracts or grants awarded following open and transparent calls for tenders; Amendment 7 # Jens ROHDE, Pavel TELIČKA Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Underlines the importance of research and innovation in the rail sector in order to achieve a significant reduction of the life-cycle cost of the railway transport system and to achieve significant increases in capacity of the railway transport system, in reliability and punctuality, as well as in order to remove the remaining technical obstacles to interoperability and to reduce the negative externalities linked to transport; highlights also that the objectives of the S2R JU are to achieve a Single European Railway Area and to enhance the attractiveness and competitiveness of the European railway system; Amendment 8 # Maria GRAPINI Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Underlines the ~~importance of~~fact that research and innovation in the rail sector are decisive for the development of a safe and globally competitive rail sector and play an important role in order to achieve a significant reduction of the life-cycle cost of the railway transport system and to achieve significant increases in capacity of the railway transport system, in reliability and punctuality, as well as in order to remove the remaining technical obstacles to interoperability and to reduce the negative externalities linked to transport; Amendment 9 # Evžen TOŠENOVSKÝ Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Recalls that research and innovation is not an isolated process using a simple rule for process management; stresses therefore that it is significantly important to identify among the research and innovation projects those that are capable to bring innovative solutions to the market; highlights that changes in the Regulation establishing the S2R JU 1a and in its Statutes will be very important for the next S2R JU development in order to improve its efficiency; stresses, in particular that there is a need to foresee the use of the principle of multiannual financing and to adopt flexible timetables for publishing projects proposals. _________________ 1a Council Regulation (EU) No 642/2014 of 16 June 2014 establishing the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking, OJ L 177, 17.6.2014, p.9. source: 616.818 2018/03/01 CONT 8 amendments... Amendment 1 # Ryszard CZARNECKI, Notis MARIAS, Beata GOSIEWSKA, Richard SULÍK, Raffaele FITTO Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. ~~Grants the Executive Director of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2016 /~~ Postpones its decision on discharge to the Executive Director of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2016; Amendment 2 # Miroslav POCHE Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that the maximum Union contribution to the activities of the S2R Joint Undertaking is EUR 450 000 000, to be paid from Horizon 2020; notes that the industry members of the Joint Undertaking are to contribute resources of at least EUR 470 000 000, consisting of at least EUR 350 000 000 for in-kind and cash contributions to the operational activities and administrative costs of the Joint Undertaking and at least EUR 120 000 000 of in-kind contributions to the Joint Undertaking’s additional activities; Amendment 3 # Indrek TARAND Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the final 2016 budget available for implementation included commitment appropriations of EUR 50 200 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 52 300 000; ~~not~~stresses that the utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 94 % and 82 % respectively which represent a low level especially for payment appropriations; notes moreover that most of the payments made by the Joint Undertaking in 2016 were pre-financing payments for Horizon 2020 projects selected under the 2015 and 2016 calls for proposals; Amendment 4 # Miroslav POCHE Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Draws attention to the fact that in two cases out of eight, the Joint Undertaking awarded grants to project consortia, despite the fact that the checks of the financial viability of the beneficiaries performed by the Research Executive Agency indicated that the financial capacity of the coordinating industry members of the consortia was weak; notes that this implies an unnecessarily high financial risk for the completion of those projects and the financial risk was particularly high in one case, in which the coordinating partner had been assigned over 45% of the total project funding; calls the Joint undertaking to inform in written the discharge authority about the development of both projects as a part of the discharge follow up; draws attention to the ongoing and substantial need for a proper risk assessment system that should be followed in a comprehensive fashion; Amendment 5 # Indrek TARAND Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Draws attention to the fact that in two cases out of eight, the Joint Undertaking awarded grants to project consortia, despite the fact that the checks of the financial viability of the beneficiaries performed by the Research Executive Agency indicated that the financial capacity of the coordinating industry members of the consortia was weak; notes that this implies an unnecessarily high financial risk for the completion of those projects and the financial risk was particularly high in one case, in which the coordinating partner had been assigned over 45% of the total project funding; calls on the JU to provide before the end of 2018 the clear reasons why it decided to take such risk; draws attention to the ongoing and substantial need for a proper risk assessment system that should be followed in a comprehensive fashion; Amendment 6 # Miroslav POCHE Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 ~~15. Reminds the Joint Undertaking that the network of the Joint Undertakings provides a useful platform for advice and cooperation;~~deleted Amendment 7 # Miroslav POCHE Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure the direct involvement of the Joint Undertaking in the process of the Horizon 2020 mid-term review in the sphere of further simplifications and harmonisation of joint undertakings; Amendment 8 # Miroslav POCHE Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Recognises the need for the Joint Undertaking to communicate with Union citizens, through the Union institutions, concerning the significant research and collaboration that it is undertaking, stresses the importance of highlighting the real improvements achieved as a consequence of its work, which are an important part of its mandate, as well as the fact that it works with other joint undertakings in promoting public awareness of the benefits of their work. Notes in this respect that also many of the private partners of the JU S2R are endowed with capacities to communicate directly with Union citizens and should be encouraged to participate in such an effort. source: 618.283

Amendments

Dossier

2017/2186(DEC)

2018/01/26 TRAN 10 amendments...

Amendment 1 #

Jens ROHDE, Pavel TELIČKA

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4

4. Notes that, in 2016, the operational costs (Title 3) represented 87,8 % of the overall S2R JU budget including the expected un-used appropriations not required in the year (Title 4); further notes that, for the operational budget, the S2R JU attained a rate of implementation of 100 % for the commitment appropriations and a rate of payment appropriations of 86,6 % ; notes that the payment appropriations were used for the pre-financing of the grants resulting from the 2015 and 2016 calls for proposals;

Amendment 10 #

Evžen TOŠENOVSKÝ

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 a (new)

12a. Underlines that research and innovation projects should be followed by a higher Technology Readiness Level (TRL) in the demonstration and implementation phase; stresses that the necessity of complementary financing using the relevant funding instruments is key to build a competitive railway system in the future.

Amendment 2 #

Jens ROHDE, Pavel TELIČKA

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7

7. Notes that the S2R JU has set up a risk management policy but has not yet performed a specific anti-fraud assessment, nor has it established an action plan for the implementation of its own anti-fraud strategy; notes also that, since only pre- financing of projects has been paid in 2016, no ex-post controls have been carried out; encourages the S2R JU to adopt, as soon as possible, an ex-post control strategy; asks the S2R JU to provide details on the risk management system, and in particular on how to avoid conflicts of interest;

Amendment 3 #

Jens ROHDE, Pavel TELIČKA

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8

8. Is concerned that in its procedure for the procurement services, S2R JU sets a maximum contract budget, which does not seem to be based on a cost estimation process and a reasonable market price reference system; asks the S2R JU to put in place appropriate cost estimation processes before launching procurement procedures in order to ensure the cost-effectiveness of its multi-annual service contracts, as experience shows that most of the bids received were close to the maximum budget;

Amendment 4 #

Maria GRAPINI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8

Amendment 5 #

Kateřina KONEČNÁ

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)

8a. Stresses that the S2R Joint Undertaking should operate in an open and transparent manner, providing all relevant information available in a timely manner to the competent authorities, establishing a mechanism for consultation with all stakeholders using the goods and services of the railway sector, and ensuring the adequate promotion of its activities, including information and awareness-raising activities aimed at the wider public. The rules of procedure of the bodies of the S2R Joint Undertaking should be made publicly available.

Amendment 6 #

Kateřina KONEČNÁ

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)

8b. Notes that, in order to achieve its objectives and to ensure the equitable participation of other undertakings, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and other investors, and with a view to modernising the integrated European railway sector, the S2R Joint Undertaking should provide an EU contribution to its activities through open and transparent procedures, mainly in the form of grants to members, e.g. in the form of public procurement contracts or grants awarded following open and transparent calls for tenders;

Amendment 7 #

Jens ROHDE, Pavel TELIČKA

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10

10. Underlines the importance of research and innovation in the rail sector in order to achieve a significant reduction of the life-cycle cost of the railway transport system and to achieve significant increases in capacity of the railway transport system, in reliability and punctuality, as well as in order to remove the remaining technical obstacles to interoperability and to reduce the negative externalities linked to transport; highlights also that the objectives of the S2R JU are to achieve a Single European Railway Area and to enhance the attractiveness and competitiveness of the European railway system;

Amendment 8 #

Maria GRAPINI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10

10. Underlines the ~~importance of~~fact that research and innovation in the rail sector are decisive for the development of a safe and globally competitive rail sector and play an important role in order to achieve a significant reduction of the life-cycle cost of the railway transport system and to achieve significant increases in capacity of the railway transport system, in reliability and punctuality, as well as in order to remove the remaining technical obstacles to interoperability and to reduce the negative externalities linked to transport;

Amendment 9 #

Evžen TOŠENOVSKÝ

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)

10a. Recalls that research and innovation is not an isolated process using a simple rule for process management; stresses therefore that it is significantly important to identify among the research and innovation projects those that are capable to bring innovative solutions to the market; highlights that changes in the Regulation establishing the S2R JU 1a and in its Statutes will be very important for the next S2R JU development in order to improve its efficiency; stresses, in particular that there is a need to foresee the use of the principle of multiannual financing and to adopt flexible timetables for publishing projects proposals. _________________ 1a Council Regulation (EU) No 642/2014 of 16 June 2014 establishing the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking, OJ L 177, 17.6.2014, p.9.

source: 616.818

2018/03/01 CONT 8 amendments...

Amendment 1 #

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Notis MARIAS, Beata GOSIEWSKA, Richard SULÍK, Raffaele FITTO

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. ~~Grants the Executive Director of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2016 /~~ Postpones its decision on discharge to the Executive Director of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2016;

Amendment 2 #

Miroslav POCHE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)

2 a. Notes that the maximum Union contribution to the activities of the S2R Joint Undertaking is EUR 450 000 000, to be paid from Horizon 2020; notes that the industry members of the Joint Undertaking are to contribute resources of at least EUR 470 000 000, consisting of at least EUR 350 000 000 for in-kind and cash contributions to the operational activities and administrative costs of the Joint Undertaking and at least EUR 120 000 000 of in-kind contributions to the Joint Undertaking’s additional activities;

Amendment 3 #

Indrek TARAND

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3

3. Notes that the final 2016 budget available for implementation included commitment appropriations of EUR 50 200 000 and payment appropriations of EUR 52 300 000; ~~not~~stresses that the utilisation rates for commitment and payment appropriations were 94 % and 82 % respectively which represent a low level especially for payment appropriations; notes moreover that most of the payments made by the Joint Undertaking in 2016 were pre-financing payments for Horizon 2020 projects selected under the 2015 and 2016 calls for proposals;

Amendment 4 #

Miroslav POCHE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

14. Draws attention to the fact that in two cases out of eight, the Joint Undertaking awarded grants to project consortia, despite the fact that the checks of the financial viability of the beneficiaries performed by the Research Executive Agency indicated that the financial capacity of the coordinating industry members of the consortia was weak; notes that this implies an unnecessarily high financial risk for the completion of those projects and the financial risk was particularly high in one case, in which the coordinating partner had been assigned over 45% of the total project funding; calls the Joint undertaking to inform in written the discharge authority about the development of both projects as a part of the discharge follow up; draws attention to the ongoing and substantial need for a proper risk assessment system that should be followed in a comprehensive fashion;

Amendment 5 #

Indrek TARAND

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

14. Draws attention to the fact that in two cases out of eight, the Joint Undertaking awarded grants to project consortia, despite the fact that the checks of the financial viability of the beneficiaries performed by the Research Executive Agency indicated that the financial capacity of the coordinating industry members of the consortia was weak; notes that this implies an unnecessarily high financial risk for the completion of those projects and the financial risk was particularly high in one case, in which the coordinating partner had been assigned over 45% of the total project funding; calls on the JU to provide before the end of 2018 the clear reasons why it decided to take such risk; draws attention to the ongoing and substantial need for a proper risk assessment system that should be followed in a comprehensive fashion;

Amendment 6 #

Miroslav POCHE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15

~~15. Reminds the Joint Undertaking that the network of the Joint Undertakings provides a useful platform for advice and cooperation;~~deleted

Amendment 7 #

Miroslav POCHE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)

15 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure the direct involvement of the Joint Undertaking in the process of the Horizon 2020 mid-term review in the sphere of further simplifications and harmonisation of joint undertakings;

Amendment 8 #

Miroslav POCHE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16

16. Recognises the need for the Joint Undertaking to communicate with Union citizens, through the Union institutions, concerning the significant research and collaboration that it is undertaking, stresses the importance of highlighting the real improvements achieved as a consequence of its work, which are an important part of its mandate, as well as the fact that it works with other joint undertakings in promoting public awareness of the benefits of their work. Notes in this respect that also many of the private partners of the JU S2R are endowed with capacities to communicate directly with Union citizens and should be encouraged to participate in such an effort.

source: 618.283

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2018-09-12Show (4) Changes | Timetravel

activities/2	date 2018-03-20T00:00:00 body EP type Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: POCHE Miroslav group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: ALDE name: DLABAJOVÁ Martina group: GUE/NGL name: OMARJEE Younous group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: KAPPEL Barbara responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2017-09-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: EPP name: HAYES Brian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2017-10-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: EPP name: FERBER Markus
activities/3	date 2018-03-23T00:00:00 docs url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0076&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0076/2018 body EP type Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/4	date 2018-04-18T00:00:00 docs url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30932&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180418&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0173 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0173/2018 body EP type Results of vote in Parliament
procedure/stage_reached	Old Awaiting committee decision New Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal

2017-11-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel

activities/0/docs/0/text

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2016, as part of the 2016 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking - S2R.

CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.

This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2016 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.

It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies, including the S2R JU, with a view to granting discharge.

Discharge procedure: the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. It represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The European Parliament is the discharge authority within the EU.

The discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement or; (iii) the refusal of the discharge.

The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.

Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure, including the S2R JU.

The Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking: the S2R JU, located in Brussels (BE), was set up by Council Regulation (EU) No 642/2014 and aims to contribute to the achievement of the Single European Railway Area, to a faster and less costly transition to a more attractive, user-friendly sustainable European rail system. It is set up for a period until 31.12.2024.

As regards the JU’s accounts, these are presented in detail in the document published by the Joint Undertaking (please refer to the annual activity report 2016 of the S2R).

2017-10-27Show (2) Changes | Timetravel

activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1	group ECR name CZARNECKI Ryszard
committees/0/shadows/1	group ECR name CZARNECKI Ryszard

2017-10-05Show (2) Changes | Timetravel

activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5	group ENF name KAPPEL Barbara
committees/0/shadows/5	group ENF name KAPPEL Barbara

2017-10-04Show (4) Changes | Timetravel

activities/1/committees/2/date	2017-10-03T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur	group: EPP name: FERBER Markus
committees/2/date	2017-10-03T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur	group: EPP name: FERBER Markus

2017-09-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel

activities/0/commission/0	DG url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en title: Budget Commissioner OETTINGER Günther
other/0	body EC dg url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en title: Budget commissioner OETTINGER Günther

2017-09-21Show (6) Changes | Timetravel

activities/1/committees/0/date	2017-09-20T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur	group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
activities/1/committees/0/shadows	group: S&D name: POCHE Miroslav group: ALDE name: DLABAJOVÁ Martina group: GUE/NGL name: OMARJEE Younous group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco
committees/0/date	2017-09-20T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur	group: EPP name: HAYES Brian
committees/0/shadows	group: S&D name: POCHE Miroslav group: ALDE name: DLABAJOVÁ Martina group: GUE/NGL name: OMARJEE Younous group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco

2017-09-16Show (3) Changes | Timetravel

activities/1	date 2017-09-13T00:00:00 body EP type Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee	CONT/8/10878
procedure/stage_reached	Old Preparatory phase in Parliament New Awaiting committee decision

2017-09-12Show (5) Changes

activities	date: 2017-06-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0365/COM_COM(2017)0365_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0365 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52017DC0365:EN body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document published commission:
committees	body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
procedure	stage_reached Preparatory phase in Parliament subject 8.70.03.06 2016 discharge type DEC - Discharge procedure reference 2017/2186(DEC) title 2016 discharge: Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking - S2R Joint Undertaking

Activites

Documents

History

ParlTrack - 2011-2024