BETA


2017/2225(INI) Impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI VAUGHAN Derek (icon: S&D S&D) NOVAKOV Andrey (icon: PPE PPE), FLACK John (icon: ECR ECR), PAET Urmas (icon: ALDE ALDE), ANDERSON Martina (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), REINTKE Terry (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), D'AMATO Rosa (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion CONT VAUGHAN Derek (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2019/03/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/09/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/09/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 565 votes to 51, with 65 abstentions, a resolution on the impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland.

The important role of cohesion policy : underlining the positive contribution of EU cohesion policy to Northern Ireland, particularly in terms of assisting the recovery of deprived areas and of building cross-community contacts in the context of the peace process, Parliament welcomed the commitment to future funding in the Commission’s draft multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2021-2027 .

It pointed out that in addition to the more general cohesion policy funds, Northern Ireland has benefited in particular from special cross-border and inter- and cross-community programmes, particularly the PEACE Programme (more than EUR 1.5 billion since 1995), which has decisively contributed to the peace process in Northern Ireland, supports the Good Friday Agreement and continues to support the reconciliation of communities. More than EUR 1 billion in EU financial assistance will be spent on economic and social development in Northern Ireland and the neighbouring regions in the current financing period , of which:

EUR 230 million will be invested in the Northern Ireland PEACE Programme (with a total budget of almost EUR 270 million) and EUR 240 million in the Interreg V-A programme for Northern Ireland, Ireland and Scotland (with a total budget of EUR 280 million).

Post 2020 : funding is considered "neutral" in Northern Ireland and Members expressed concern that the end of these programmes may endanger cross-border and inter- and cross-community trust-building activities and, as a consequence, the peace process.

Without prejudice to the negotiations between the Union and the United Kingdom, Parliament considered it essential that Northern Ireland be able to participate in certain special Union programmes beyond 2020 , such as the PEACE programme and the Interreg V-A programme for Northern Ireland, Ireland and Scotland. It also requested, in the context of the post-2020 MFF, that all relevant financial instruments be implemented to enable the objectives of cohesion policy to be pursued.

Parliament noted the Commission’s intention to propose the continuation of the PEACE and Interreg programmes in its proposal for the MFF 2021-2027. It also took note of the UK position paper on the future of Cohesion Policy of April 2018, in which the UK states its willingness to explore a potential successor to PEACE IV, as well as Interreg V-A , for the post-2020 period.

In addition, Members considered that it is essential that the people of Northern Ireland, and in particular young people, should continue to have access to economic, social and cultural exchanges across Europe, particularly to the Erasmus+ programme .

Lastly, Parliament stressed that good practices with cohesion funding and the PEACE Programme should be taken as the EU model and promoted in order to overcome mistrust among communities in conflict and to achieve lasting peace in other parts of Europe and even worldwide.

Documents
2018/09/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/09/10
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/06/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on the impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland.

Underlining the positive contribution of EU cohesion policy to Northern Ireland, particularly in terms of assisting the recovery of deprived areas and of building cross-community contacts in the context of the peace process, Members welcomed the commitment to future funding in the Commission’s draft multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2021-2027.

They pointed out that in addition to the more general cohesion policy funds, Northern Ireland has benefited in particular from special cross-border and inter- and cross-community programmes, particularly the PEACE Programme (more than EUR 1.5 billion since 1995), which has decisively contributed to the peace process in Northern Ireland, supports the Good Friday Agreement and continues to support the reconciliation of communities. More than EUR 1 billion in EU financial assistance will be spent on economic and social development in Northern Ireland and the neighbouring regions in the current financing period , of which:

EUR 230 million will be invested in the Northern Ireland PEACE Programme (with a total budget of almost EUR 270 million) and EUR 240 million in the Interreg V-A programme for Northern Ireland, Ireland and Scotland (with a total budget of EUR 280 million).

The committee believed that the special EU programmes for Northern Ireland are of key importance for sustaining the peace process , as they foster cross-community trust-building measures, and measures for a peaceful coexistence. The funding is seen as ‘neutral money’ in Northern Ireland and the committee feared that an end to these programmes would endanger cross-border and inter- and cross-community trust-building activities and, as a consequence, the peace process;

In addition to the Commission’s intention to propose the continuation of the PEACE and Interreg programmes in its proposal for the MFF 2021-2027, Members noted the UK position paper on the future of Cohesion Policy of April 2018, in which the UK states its willingness to explore a potential successor to PEACE IV, as well as Interreg V-A, for the post-2020 period with the Northern Ireland Executive, the Irish Government and the EU, in addition to its engagement to honour commitments to PEACE and Interreg under the current MFF.

Members went on to stress that the Northern Irish reconciliation process is a positive example for other areas in the EU which have experienced conflict, and good practices with cohesion funding and the PEACE Programme should be taken as the EU model and promoted in order to overcome mistrust among communities in conflict and to achieve lasting peace in other parts of Europe and even worldwide.

Lastly, Members felt that more must be done to inform the general public about the impact of EU-funded projects for the peace process and the economic development of the region.

Documents
2018/06/20
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2018/05/16
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/05/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/04/11
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/12/07
   EP - VAUGHAN Derek (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2017/10/26
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2017/09/07
   EP - VAUGHAN Derek (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in REGI

Documents

Votes

A8-0240/2018 - Derek Vaughan - Vote unique 11/09/2018 12:44:07.000

2018/09/11 Outcome: +: 565, 0: 65, -: 51
DE IT ES PL FR RO PT GB CZ HU BE BG AT SE NL SK FI LT HR IE SI LV EE EL MT LU DK CY ??
Total
85
64
48
50
63
28
18
66
21
20
20
15
18
18
25
13
12
9
10
8
8
7
6
17
6
5
11
6
2
icon: PPE PPE
201

United Kingdom PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
170

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
71

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2
3

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4
3

NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
AmendmentsDossier
58 2017/2225(INI)
2018/04/30 CONT 8 amendments...
source: 621.114
2018/05/16 REGI 50 amendments...
source: 622.106

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0240&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0240_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0323
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0323_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek date: 2017-09-07T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2017-09-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek date: 2017-12-07T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2017-12-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
activities
  • date: 2017-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2017-12-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: NOVAKOV Andrey group: ECR name: FLACK John group: ALDE name: PAET Urmas group: GUE/NGL name: ANDERSON Martina group: Verts/ALE name: REINTKE Terry group: EFD name: D'AMATO Rosa responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2017-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
  • date: 2018-06-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2017-12-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: NOVAKOV Andrey group: ECR name: FLACK John group: ALDE name: PAET Urmas group: GUE/NGL name: ANDERSON Martina group: Verts/ALE name: REINTKE Terry group: EFD name: D'AMATO Rosa responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2017-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
  • date: 2018-06-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0240&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0240/2018 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2018-09-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180910&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-09-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2017-09-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CONT
date
2017-12-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2017-12-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAUGHAN Derek group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
REGI
date
2017-09-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
docs
  • date: 2018-04-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE620.793 title: PE620.793 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE620.996&secondRef=02 title: PE620.996 committee: CONT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE622.106 title: PE622.106 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2019-03-11T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=31362&j=0&l=en title: SP(2018)829 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2017-10-26T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-06-20T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-06-27T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0240&language=EN title: A8-0240/2018 summary: The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on the impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland. Underlining the positive contribution of EU cohesion policy to Northern Ireland, particularly in terms of assisting the recovery of deprived areas and of building cross-community contacts in the context of the peace process, Members welcomed the commitment to future funding in the Commission’s draft multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2021-2027. They pointed out that in addition to the more general cohesion policy funds, Northern Ireland has benefited in particular from special cross-border and inter- and cross-community programmes, particularly the PEACE Programme (more than EUR 1.5 billion since 1995), which has decisively contributed to the peace process in Northern Ireland, supports the Good Friday Agreement and continues to support the reconciliation of communities. More than EUR 1 billion in EU financial assistance will be spent on economic and social development in Northern Ireland and the neighbouring regions in the current financing period , of which: EUR 230 million will be invested in the Northern Ireland PEACE Programme (with a total budget of almost EUR 270 million) and EUR 240 million in the Interreg V-A programme for Northern Ireland, Ireland and Scotland (with a total budget of EUR 280 million). The committee believed that the special EU programmes for Northern Ireland are of key importance for sustaining the peace process , as they foster cross-community trust-building measures, and measures for a peaceful coexistence. The funding is seen as ‘neutral money’ in Northern Ireland and the committee feared that an end to these programmes would endanger cross-border and inter- and cross-community trust-building activities and, as a consequence, the peace process; In addition to the Commission’s intention to propose the continuation of the PEACE and Interreg programmes in its proposal for the MFF 2021-2027, Members noted the UK position paper on the future of Cohesion Policy of April 2018, in which the UK states its willingness to explore a potential successor to PEACE IV, as well as Interreg V-A, for the post-2020 period with the Northern Ireland Executive, the Irish Government and the EU, in addition to its engagement to honour commitments to PEACE and Interreg under the current MFF. Members went on to stress that the Northern Irish reconciliation process is a positive example for other areas in the EU which have experienced conflict, and good practices with cohesion funding and the PEACE Programme should be taken as the EU model and promoted in order to overcome mistrust among communities in conflict and to achieve lasting peace in other parts of Europe and even worldwide. Lastly, Members felt that more must be done to inform the general public about the impact of EU-funded projects for the peace process and the economic development of the region.
  • date: 2018-09-10T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180910&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-09-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31362&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2018-09-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0323 title: T8-0323/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 565 votes to 51, with 65 abstentions, a resolution on the impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland. The important role of cohesion policy : underlining the positive contribution of EU cohesion policy to Northern Ireland, particularly in terms of assisting the recovery of deprived areas and of building cross-community contacts in the context of the peace process, Parliament welcomed the commitment to future funding in the Commission’s draft multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2021-2027 . It pointed out that in addition to the more general cohesion policy funds, Northern Ireland has benefited in particular from special cross-border and inter- and cross-community programmes, particularly the PEACE Programme (more than EUR 1.5 billion since 1995), which has decisively contributed to the peace process in Northern Ireland, supports the Good Friday Agreement and continues to support the reconciliation of communities. More than EUR 1 billion in EU financial assistance will be spent on economic and social development in Northern Ireland and the neighbouring regions in the current financing period , of which: EUR 230 million will be invested in the Northern Ireland PEACE Programme (with a total budget of almost EUR 270 million) and EUR 240 million in the Interreg V-A programme for Northern Ireland, Ireland and Scotland (with a total budget of EUR 280 million). Post 2020 : funding is considered "neutral" in Northern Ireland and Members expressed concern that the end of these programmes may endanger cross-border and inter- and cross-community trust-building activities and, as a consequence, the peace process. Without prejudice to the negotiations between the Union and the United Kingdom, Parliament considered it essential that Northern Ireland be able to participate in certain special Union programmes beyond 2020 , such as the PEACE programme and the Interreg V-A programme for Northern Ireland, Ireland and Scotland. It also requested, in the context of the post-2020 MFF, that all relevant financial instruments be implemented to enable the objectives of cohesion policy to be pursued. Parliament noted the Commission’s intention to propose the continuation of the PEACE and Interreg programmes in its proposal for the MFF 2021-2027. It also took note of the UK position paper on the future of Cohesion Policy of April 2018, in which the UK states its willingness to explore a potential successor to PEACE IV, as well as Interreg V-A , for the post-2020 period. In addition, Members considered that it is essential that the people of Northern Ireland, and in particular young people, should continue to have access to economic, social and cultural exchanges across Europe, particularly to the Erasmus+ programme . Lastly, Parliament stressed that good practices with cohesion funding and the PEACE Programme should be taken as the EU model and promoted in order to overcome mistrust among communities in conflict and to achieve lasting peace in other parts of Europe and even worldwide.
  • date: 2018-09-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/regional-and-urban-policy_en title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
REGI/8/11295
New
  • REGI/8/11295
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)
New
4.70.02
Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)
activities/0
date
2017-10-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1
date
2018-06-20T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2
date
2018-06-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0240&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0240/2018
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/3
date
2018-09-10T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180910&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
body
EP
type
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
activities/4/date
Old
2017-10-26T00:00:00
New
2018-09-11T00:00:00
activities/4/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
committees/0/date
2017-12-07T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
committees/1/date
2017-09-07T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: VAUGHAN Derek
committees/1/shadows
  • group: EPP name: NOVAKOV Andrey
  • group: ECR name: FLACK John
  • group: ALDE name: PAET Urmas
  • group: GUE/NGL name: ANDERSON Martina
  • group: Verts/ALE name: REINTKE Terry
  • group: EFD name: D'AMATO Rosa
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
New
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities
  • date: 2017-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/regional-and-urban-policy_en title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
REGI/8/11295
geographical_area
United Kingdom
reference
2017/2225(INI)
title
Impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Implementation
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)