Progress: Awaiting final decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | TANG Paul ( S&D) | MATO Gabriel ( PPE), FOX Ashley ( ECR), JEŽEK Petr ( ALDE), JOLY Eva ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 1, 1, 3
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 1, 1, 3Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 451 votes to 69, with 64 abstentions, in the framework of the consultation procedure, the report by Paul TANG (S&D, NL) on the proposal for a Council directive on the common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services.
Parliament approved the Commission's proposal subject to the following amendments:
Objective
The proposed Directive seeks to establish the common system of a digital services tax (DST) on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services.
Parliament pointed out that, on average, digital businesses face an effective tax rate of only 9.5%, compared to 23.2% for traditional business models. The objective would be to close the gap between the taxation of digital revenues and that of traditional revenues so that all companies operating in the Single Market may benefit from a level playing field.
Taxable products
Parliament proposed broadening the tax base by including: (i) the processing, transmission and sale of data collected about users and generated from such users' activities on digital interfaces; and (iv) the supply of digital content such as video, audio, games or texts. If no revenues are obtained from the supply of such content, goods and services, there should be no DST liability.
Taxable person
An entity shall qualify as a taxable person only if only if it meets both of the following conditions: (i) the total amount of worldwide revenues reported by the entity for the latest complete financial year for which a financial statement is available exceeds EUR 750 million and (ii) the total amount of taxable revenues obtained by the entity within the Union during that financial year exceeds EUR 40 million .
The DST rate shall be set at 3% .
An amendment clarifies that the processing of personal data in the context of DST shall be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, including data that may be necessary in relation to Internet Protocol (IP) addresses or other means of geolocation.
The Commission shall analyse whether the establishment of a dispute resolution mechanism would further increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the settlement of disagreements between Member States. The Commission shall submit a report thereon to the European Parliament and the Council, including, if appropriate, a legislative proposal.
Fight against fraud
Member States shall adopt measures, including penalties and sanctions , to prevent tax evasion, avoidance and abuse with respect to DST. Members considered that total digital service tax paid by a taxable person per Member State should be a part of the system of country-by-country reporting. In addition, in case a taxable person is liable to DST in more than one Member State, the Commission shall audit, every three years the DST return filed with the Member State of identification.
Automatic and mandatory exchange of information
In order for tax authorities to assess tax due properly and to ensure the proper and uniform implementation of this Directive, the exchange of information on tax matters shall be automatic and mandatory, as laid down by Council directive 2011/16/EU. Member States shall report every year to the Commission relevant figures and information on the payment of the DST by entities.
Sunset clause
Since the DST is a temporary measure awaiting a permanent solution, Members proposed a sunset clause that would result in this Directive automatically expiring upon the establishment significant digital presence or the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), including Parliament's position on the permanent digital establishment. The ad hoc measures contained in this Directive should not delay works on these issues.
Report and review
Two years after the date of entry into force of the Directive, the Commission shall make an assessment of the application of this Directive and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals for its review in accordance with the principles of fair taxation of the digital sector.
In particular, the Commission shall assess the increase in the DST rate from 3% to 5% together with a corresponding tax allowance in order to limit the difference in effective tax rates between traditional and digital companies.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, in the framework of the consultation procedure, the report by Paul TANG (S&D, NL) on the proposal for a Council directive on the common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission's proposal subject to the following amendments:
Objective : the proposed Directive seeks to establish the common system of a digital services tax (DST) on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services.
The report pointed out that, on average, digital businesses face an effective tax rate of only 9.5%, compared to 23.2% for traditional business models.
This system is not fair and it is important to close the gap between the taxation of digital revenues and that of traditional revenues . Members considered that a single DST rate at Union level constitutes a first step towards further harmonisation of corporate taxation at Union level.
Taxable products : Members proposed broadening the tax base by including in the scope of taxable revenue the supply of digital content such as video, audio or text using a digital interface. If no revenue is derived from the supply of such content, goods and services, there should be no DST liability.
Taxable person : an entity shall qualify as a taxable person only if only if it meets both of the following conditions: (i) the total amount of worldwide revenues reported by the entity for the latest complete financial year for which a financial statement is available exceeds EUR 750 million and (ii) the total amount of taxable revenues obtained by the entity within the Union during that financial year exceeds EUR 40 million .
The DST rate shall be set at 3% .
An amendment clarifies that the processing of personal data in the context of DST shall be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, including data that may be necessary in relation to Internet Protocol (IP) addresses or other means of geolocation.
The Commission shall analyse whether the establishment of a dispute resolution mechanism would further increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the settlement of disagreements between Member States. The Commission shall submit a report thereon to the European Parliament and the Council, including, if appropriate, a legislative proposal.
Fight against fraud : Member States shall adopt measures, including penalties and sanctions , to prevent tax evasion, avoidance and abuse with respect to DST. Members considered that total digital service tax paid by a taxable person per Member State should be a part of the system of country-by-country reporting. In addition, in case a taxable person is liable to DST in more than one Member State, the Commission shall audit, every three years the DST return filed with the Member State of identification.
Automatic and mandatory exchange of information : in order for tax authorities to assess tax due properly and to ensure the proper and uniform implementation of this Directive, the exchange of information on tax matters shall be automatic and mandatory, as laid down by Council directive 2011/16/EU. Member States shall report every year to the Commission relevant figures and information on the payment of the DST by entities.
Sunset clause conditional on permanent measures : since the DST is a temporary measure awaiting a permanent solution, Members proposed a sunset clause that would result in this Directive automatically expiring upon the establishment significant digital presence or the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), including Parliament's position on the permanent digital establishment.
Two years after the date of entry into force of the Directive, the Commission shall make an assessment of the application of this Directive and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals for its review in accordance with the principles of fair taxation of the digital sector.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to establish the common system of a digital services tax (DST) on the revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: the global economy is rapidly becoming digital and, as a result, new ways of doing business have emerged. The current corporate taxation rules were mainly developed during the 20th century for traditional businesses.
However, they were mainly conceived in the early 20th century for traditional "brick and mortar" businesses and fail to capture the global reach of digital activities where physical presence is not a requirement anymore in order to be able to supply digital services.
The Commission has acknowledged that the ideal approach would be to find multilateral, international solutions to taxing the digital economy given the global nature of this challenge. The Commission is working closely with the OECD to support the development of an international solution.
Pending a comprehensive solution, which may take time to adopt and implement, Member States face pressure to act on this issue , given the risk that their corporate tax bases are significantly eroded over time, and also due to the perceived unfairness of the situation.
Such uncoordinated measures taken by Member States individually risk further fragmenting the Single Market and distort competition.
This proposal addresses in an interim way the problem that the current corporate tax rules are inadequate for the digital economy.
It is part of a package of measures which also includes a proposal for a directive on a comprehensive corporate tax solution for digital activities.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the option chosen consists of a tax with a limited scope, levied on a company's gross revenues from the provision of certain digital services for which the creation of value by users plays a central role.
CONTENT: the proposal establishes the common system of a digital services tax (DST) on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services.
The specific objective of this proposal is to put forward a measure that targets the revenues stemming from the supply of certain digital services and that is easy to implement and helps to level the playing field in the interim period until a comprehensive solution is in place.
Taxable revenues : digital services tax (DST) is a tax with a targeted scope, levied on the revenues resulting from the supply of certain digital services characterised by user value creation .
In particular, taxable revenues should be those resulting from the provision of the following services:
the placing on a digital interface of advertising targeted at users of that interface; the making available of multi-sided digital interfaces which allow users to find other users and to interact with them, and which may also facilitate the provision of underlying supplies of goods or services directly between users (sometimes referred to as "intermediation" services); and the transmission of data collected about users and generated from such users' activities on digital interfaces.
Taxable person : an entity above both of the following thresholds qualifies as a taxable person for the purposes of the DST:
the total amount of worldwide revenues reported by the entity for the latest complete financial year for which a financial statement is available exceeds EUR 750 million ; the total amount of taxable revenues obtained by the entity within the Union during that financial year exceeds EUR 50 million .
Any entity qualifying as a taxable person and obtaining taxable revenues treated as obtained in a Member State should be subject to DST in that Member State, irrespective of whether that entity is established in that Member State, in another Member State or in a non-Union jurisdiction.
Place of taxation : in line with the concept of user value creation that underpins the objective scope of DST, this provision determines that DST is due in the Member State or Member States where the users are located . The new tax will be chargeable in a Member State on the proportion of taxable revenues obtained by a taxable person in a tax period that is treated as obtained in that Member State. The proposal lays down the rule on how DST should be calculated.
Obligations : the proposal establishes a set of obligations to be fulfilled by taxable persons with DST liability. In particular, it provides for the establishment of a simplification mechanism in the form of a one-stop-shop for taxable persons with DST liability in one or more Member States, so that all their DST obligations can be fulfilled at once (identification, submission of the DST return, and payment).
The obligations should be fulfilled in a single Member State (Member State of identification), which should collect the information and the payment of the DST on behalf of other Member States where the DST is due, and subsequently share that relevant information and the collected DST amounts with them.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to establish the common system of a digital services tax (DST) on the revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: the global economy is rapidly becoming digital and, as a result, new ways of doing business have emerged. The current corporate taxation rules were mainly developed during the 20th century for traditional businesses.
However, they were mainly conceived in the early 20th century for traditional "brick and mortar" businesses and fail to capture the global reach of digital activities where physical presence is not a requirement anymore in order to be able to supply digital services.
The Commission has acknowledged that the ideal approach would be to find multilateral, international solutions to taxing the digital economy given the global nature of this challenge. The Commission is working closely with the OECD to support the development of an international solution.
Pending a comprehensive solution, which may take time to adopt and implement, Member States face pressure to act on this issue , given the risk that their corporate tax bases are significantly eroded over time, and also due to the perceived unfairness of the situation.
Such uncoordinated measures taken by Member States individually risk further fragmenting the Single Market and distort competition.
This proposal addresses in an interim way the problem that the current corporate tax rules are inadequate for the digital economy.
It is part of a package of measures which also includes a proposal for a directive on a comprehensive corporate tax solution for digital activities.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the option chosen consists of a tax with a limited scope, levied on a company's gross revenues from the provision of certain digital services for which the creation of value by users plays a central role.
CONTENT: the proposal establishes the common system of a digital services tax (DST) on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services.
The specific objective of this proposal is to put forward a measure that targets the revenues stemming from the supply of certain digital services and that is easy to implement and helps to level the playing field in the interim period until a comprehensive solution is in place.
Taxable revenues : digital services tax (DST) is a tax with a targeted scope, levied on the revenues resulting from the supply of certain digital services characterised by user value creation .
In particular, taxable revenues should be those resulting from the provision of the following services:
the placing on a digital interface of advertising targeted at users of that interface; the making available of multi-sided digital interfaces which allow users to find other users and to interact with them, and which may also facilitate the provision of underlying supplies of goods or services directly between users (sometimes referred to as "intermediation" services); and the transmission of data collected about users and generated from such users' activities on digital interfaces.
Taxable person : an entity above both of the following thresholds qualifies as a taxable person for the purposes of the DST:
the total amount of worldwide revenues reported by the entity for the latest complete financial year for which a financial statement is available exceeds EUR 750 million ; the total amount of taxable revenues obtained by the entity within the Union during that financial year exceeds EUR 50 million .
Any entity qualifying as a taxable person and obtaining taxable revenues treated as obtained in a Member State should be subject to DST in that Member State, irrespective of whether that entity is established in that Member State, in another Member State or in a non-Union jurisdiction.
Place of taxation : in line with the concept of user value creation that underpins the objective scope of DST, this provision determines that DST is due in the Member State or Member States where the users are located . The new tax will be chargeable in a Member State on the proportion of taxable revenues obtained by a taxable person in a tax period that is treated as obtained in that Member State. The proposal lays down the rule on how DST should be calculated.
Obligations : the proposal establishes a set of obligations to be fulfilled by taxable persons with DST liability. In particular, it provides for the establishment of a simplification mechanism in the form of a one-stop-shop for taxable persons with DST liability in one or more Member States, so that all their DST obligations can be fulfilled at once (identification, submission of the DST return, and payment).
The obligations should be fulfilled in a single Member State (Member State of identification), which should collect the information and the payment of the DST on behalf of other Member States where the DST is due, and subsequently share that relevant information and the collected DST amounts with them.
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Reasoned opinion: PE638.492
- Reasoned opinion: PE638.491
- Reasoned opinion: PE638.490
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)44
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0523/2018
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Go to the page
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A8-0428/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE629.512
- Committee draft report: PE627.911
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Legislative proposal: COM(2018)0148
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2018)0148
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE627.911
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE629.512
- Legislative proposal: COM(2018)0148 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)44
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Contribution: COM(2018)0148
- Reasoned opinion: PE638.492
- Reasoned opinion: PE638.491
- Reasoned opinion: PE638.490
Votes
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 6/2 13/12/2018 12:13:00.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 9 13/12/2018 12:13:13.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 25 13/12/2018 12:13:44.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 27 13/12/2018 12:13:58.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 35 13/12/2018 12:14:16.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 63 13/12/2018 12:15:14.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 54=60= 13/12/2018 12:15:28.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 41 13/12/2018 12:15:42.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 50 13/12/2018 12:16:01.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Am 62 13/12/2018 12:16:22.000 #
A8-0428/2018 - Paul Tang - Proposition de la Commission 13/12/2018 12:16:40.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
154 |
2018/0073(CNS)
2018/10/22
ECON
154 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) The
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) Th
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 a (new) (24a) To protect small enterprises and start-ups compared to larger companies, the DST rate should be set at a different level over the revenues between EUR 25 000 000 and EUR 100 000 000 and over the revenues above EUR 100 000.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 b (new) (24b) To avoid a cliff effect and to protect small companies and start-ups, every taxable person or entity in scope should receive an annual tax allowance of EUR 750 000.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 (26) Special rules
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) In order to alleviate possible cases of double taxation where the same revenues are subject to the corporate income tax and DST,
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) Where the users with respect of a given taxable service are located in different Member States or non-Union jurisdictions, the relevant taxable revenues obtained from that service should be allocated to each Member State in a proportional way on the basis of certain specific allocation keys. Such keys should be set out depending on the nature of each taxable service and the distinctive elements triggering the receipt of revenues for the provider of such a service. Where the allocation key results in an imbalanced apportionment that fails to reflect the real economic activity, a dispute resolution mechanism could remedy such a situation. In light of the foregoing, the Commission should assess the possible establishment of a dispute resolution mechanism in order to ensure the proper resolution of disputes when different Member States are involved.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) As regards the exploitation, sale or transmission of data collected about users, the allocation of taxable revenues in a tax period to a Member State should take into account the number of users from whom data exploited, sold or transmitted in that tax period has been generated as a result of such users having used a device in that Member State.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34) Any processing of personal data carried out in the context of DST should be conducted in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council31 , including that which may be necessary in relation to Internet Protocol (IP) addresses or other means of geolocation, without allowing for identification of users. The Member States' tax authority shall be informed of the method used to determine the location of users . In particular, regard should be given to the need to provide appropriate technical and organisational measures to comply with the rules relating to the lawfulness and security of processing activities, the provision of information and the rights of data subjects. Whenever possible, personal data should be rendered anonymous. _________________
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 (34) Any processing of personal data carried out in the context of DST should be conducted in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council31 , including that which may be necessary in relation to Internet Protocol (IP) addresses or other means of geolocation. In particular, regard should be given to the need to provide appropriate technical and organisational measures to comply with the rules relating to the lawfulness and security of processing activities, especially with the principles of necessity and proportionality, the provision of information and the rights of data subjects. Whenever possible, personal data should be rendered anonymous. _________________ 31 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) The taxable revenues should be equal to the total gross revenues obtained by a taxable person, net of value added tax and other similar taxes. Taxable revenues should be recognised as obtained by a taxable person at the time when they become due, regardless of whether they have actually been paid by then. DST should be chargeable in a Member State on the proportion of taxable revenues obtained by a taxable person in a tax period that is treated as obtained in that Member State, and should be calculated by applying the DST rate to that proportion. There should be a single DST rate at Union level in order to avoid distortions in the Single Market. The DST rate should be set at 3% over the revenues between EUR 25 000 000 and EUR 100 000 000 and 5% over the revenues above EUR 100 000, which achieves an appropriate balance between revenues generated by the tax and accounting for the differential DST impact for businesses with different profit margins, as larger digital revenue streams would in most cases enable companies to operate with a higher profit margin.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) The taxable revenues should be equal to the total gross revenues obtained by a taxable person, net of value added tax and other similar taxes. Taxable revenues should be recognised as obtained by a taxable person at the time when they become due, regardless of whether they have actually been paid by then. DST should be chargeable in a Member State on the proportion of taxable revenues obtained by a taxable person in a tax period that is treated as obtained in that Member State, and should be calculated by applying the DST rate to that proportion. There should be a single DST rate at Union level in order to avoid distortions in the Single Market.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) The taxable revenues should be equal to the total gross revenues obtained
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) The taxable revenues should be equal to the total gross revenues obtained by a taxable person, net of value added tax and other similar taxes. Taxable revenues should be recognised as obtained by a taxable person at the time when they become due, regardless of whether they have actually been paid by then. DST should be chargeable in a Member State on the proportion of taxable revenues obtained by a taxable person in a tax period that is treated as obtained in that Member State, and should be calculated by applying the DST rate to that proportion. There should be a single DST rate at Union level in order
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) The taxable revenues should be equal to the total gross revenues obtained by a taxable person, net of value added tax and other similar taxes. Taxable revenues should be recognised as obtained by a taxable person at the time when they become due, regardless of whether they have actually been paid by then. DST should be chargeable in a Member State on the proportion of taxable revenues obtained by a taxable person in a tax period that is treated as obtained in that Member State, and should be calculated by applying the DST rate to that proportion. There should be a single DST rate at Union level in order to avoid distortions in the Single Market. The DST rate should be set at
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) The taxable revenues should be equal to the total gross revenues obtained by a taxable person, net of value added tax and other similar taxes. Taxable revenues should be recognised as obtained by a taxable person at the time when they become due, regardless of whether they have actually been paid by then. DST should be chargeable in a Member State on the proportion of taxable revenues obtained by a taxable person in a tax period that is treated as obtained in that Member State, and should be calculated by applying the DST rate to that proportion. There should be a single DST rate at Union level set at 3% in order to avoid distortions in the Single Market
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 a (new) (35a) A single DST rate at Union level constitutes a first step towards further harmonisation of corporate taxation at Union level. In order to create a level playing field and to eliminate tax competition and the resulting race to the bottom as regards corporate taxation levels, a minimum effective corporate tax rate should also be introduced at Union level in the near future.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 a (new) (35a) The annual tax allowance of EUR 750 000 that every taxable person in scope of this Directive should receive to avoid cliff effects, corresponds with 3% of the lower threshold of EUR 25 000 000, creating a de facto minimum taxation of 3% of every euro earned above EUR 25 000 000.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Member States should be able to lay down accounting, record-keeping or
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new) (37a) Total digital service tax paid by a taxable person per Member State should be a part of the system of country-by- country reporting.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 a (new) (40a) The DST is conceived as a temporary measure in order to address the current distortion of competition between digital and non-digital businesses. This situation would however be best addressed by a more comprehensive solution involving a fundamental change in corporate taxation rules at Union level. The best solution to tackle the problem of tax avoidance by digital companies and, more generally, by all companies, resides in the adoption of the Council Directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base including the digital permanent establishment as proposed in the legislative resolution of the European Parliament of 15 March 2018 on the proposal for a Council Directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, together with the adoption of the Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence. Therefore, this Directive should expire as soon as these two latter Directives enter into application.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 a (new) (40a) Three years after .... [the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission should produce an evaluation report of the implementation of this Directive and its effects. In particular, the Commission should assess in this report the amount in tax paid due to the DST in each Member State and who bore the economic incidence of the tax. The Commission should present the report both to Parliament and to Council.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 a (new) (40a) Two years after...[the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission should make an assessment of the application of this Directive and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals for its review in accordance with the principles of fair taxation of the digital sector.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 b (new) (40b) DST is a temporary measure which should by no means delay the entrance into force of a permanent solution and it should expire simultaneously after the entrance into force of this permanent solution.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 b (new) (40b) Member States should regularly report to the Commission on the payment of the DST by entities, the functioning of the OSS and the cooperation with other Member States for tax collection and payment.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 c (new) (40c) Three years after...[the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission should make an assessment of the application of this Directive and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, if appropriate, by proposals for its review. The report should assess, in particular, the entities covered by the scope of the DST (type of revenues, size, etc.), the amount of tax paid in each Member State, the functioning of the OSS and the re-allocation of DST between Member States, in addition to the potential tax planning practices that were developed by entities to avoid paying the DST.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) The objectives of this Directive aim at protecting the integrity of the Single Market, ensuring its proper functioning and avoiding distortion of competition. Should Member States consider the interim measure, the scope shall be kept targeted in order to mitigate the impact on investment, innovations and growth in the European Digital Single Market. Since those objectives, by their very nature, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States but can rather be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) The objectives of this Directive aim at protecting the integrity of the Single Market, ensuring its fair and proper functioning and avoiding distortion of competition. Since those objectives, by their very nature, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States but can rather be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives,
Amendment 129 #
(41a) With the view of increasing the resilience of the Union’s tax system further, the application of the ordinary legislative procedure (Article 114 TFEU) for legislation related to corporate income taxation should be considered,
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) the supply of digital content via digital interfaces, such as applications, music, videos, texts or games;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new) (bb) the online sale of goods or services via digital interfaces;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) the making available to users of content on a digital interface such as video, audio or text using a digital interface;
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) the making available to users of digital content on digital interfaces;
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (cb) the sale of goods or services which are contracted online via digital interfaces.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (cb) the sale of goods and services on digital interfaces.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) the making available of a digital interface where the sole or main purpose of making the interface available is for the entity making it available to supply
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) the making available of a digital interface where the sole or main purpose of making the interface available is for the entity making it available to supply
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) the making available of a digital interface where the sole or main purpose of making the interface available is for the entity making it available to supply
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Taxable revenues resulting from the provision of services listed in paragraph 1 shall be reduced by the part of those revenues generated by an entity in a Member State from users located in that Member State if such revenues are reported by this entity for corporate income tax purposes in that Member State and subject to corporate income tax in that Member State.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 7 Amendment 142 #
1. 'Taxable person', with respect to a tax period, shall mean an entity
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. 'Taxable person', with respect to a tax period, shall mean an entity meeting
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the total amount of taxable revenues obtained by the entity within the Union during the relevant financial year exceeds EUR 25
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. The rule in Article 5(1) shall apply in determining under paragraph 1
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 6 6. If the entity referred to in paragraph 1 belongs to a consolidated group for financial accounting purposes, that paragraph shall be applied instead to the
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) in the case of a service falling within Article 3(1)(ca), the digital content in question appears on the user's device at a time when the device is being used in that Member State in that tax period to access a digital interface;
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new) (cb) in the case of goods and services falling within Article 3(1)(cb), the goods and services in question are delivered to users in that Member State in that tax period.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) as regards taxable revenues falling under Article 3(1)(ca), in proportion to the time the content made available to users appears on a user’s device while the device is being used in that Member State to access the digital interface in that tax period;
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point c b (new) (cb) as regards taxable revenues falling under Article 3(1)(cb), in proportion to the sales value of the goods and services delivered to a buyer in that Member State in that tax period.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. For the purpose of calculating the proportion of an entity’s total taxable revenues that is treated under paragraph 1 as obtained in a Member State under point 3, the users located in the Member States where the entity has met the criteria to exclude revenues from taxable revenues in accordance with Article 3 paragraph 5a shall be excluded from the calculating of the proportion of an entity’s taxable revenues allocated to each Member State.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 6 6. The data that may be collected from users for the purposes of applying this Directive shall be limited to data indicating the Member State where the users are located, without allowing for the identification of those users. Any processing of personal data carried out for the purposes of applying this Directive shall fully comply with Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The Commission shall analyse whether the establishment of a dispute resolution mechanism would further increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the settlement of disagreements between Member States. The Commission shall submit a report thereon to the European Parliament and the Council, including, if appropriate, a legislative proposal.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 DST shall be chargeable in a Member State on the proportion of taxable revenues obtained by a taxable person in a tax period that is treated under Article 5 as obtained in that Member State unless the entity is subject to corporate income tax on its total amount of taxable revenues in that Member State. The DST shall become due in that Member State on the next working day following the end of that tax period.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The DST rate shall be
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 The DST rate shall be
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) 2. The taxable person shall receive an annual tax allowance EUR 750 000.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. However, if the taxable person ceases to be liable to DST in that Member State of identification chosen under Article 10(3)(b), the taxable person shall change its Member State of identification in accordance with the requirements of Article 10, without prejudice to paragraph 2a.
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. If the taxable person ceases to be liable to DST in the Member State of identification chosen under Article 10(3)(b), the taxable person may decide to keep the Member State of identification initially chosen, given that the taxable person may be liable to DST in that Member State again in the next tax period. If the taxable person is not liable to DST in that Member State for more than two consecutive tax periods, it shall change its Member State of identification in accordance with the requirements of Article 10.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. The DST return shall also show, with respect to the tax period, the total amount of
Amendment 169 #
2. The amendments referred to in paragraph 1 shall be submitted electronically to the Member State of identification within t
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. Member States may adopt measures, including penalties and sanctions, to prevent tax evasion, avoidance and abuse with respect to DST.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. Member States
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. After adoption of this Directive, the Commission shall make a legislative proposal to include in Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches, providing for the total amount of digital service tax paid by a taxable person to the different Member States to be added to the list of obligatory country-by-country reporting standards.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Chapter 4 – title ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION AND MANDATORY EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article -20 (new) Article -20 Automatic and mandatory exchange of information In order for tax authorities to assess tax due properly and to ensure the proper and uniform implementation of this Directive, the exchange of information on tax matters shall be automatic and mandatory, as laid down by Council directive 2011/16/EU. Member States shall allocate adequate staff, expertise and budget resources to their national tax administrations as well as resources for the training of tax administration staff focusing on cross-border tax cooperation and on the automatic exchange of information in order to ensure full implementation of this Directive.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 a (new) Article 23a Evaluation Report Three years after.... [the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall produce an evaluation report of the implementation of this Directive and its effects. In particular, the Commission shall assess in this report the amount in tax paid due to the DST in each Member State and who bore the economic incidence of the tax. The Commission shall present the report to both Parliament and Council.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 a (new) Article 24a Review clause (Three years after...[the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall make an assessment of the application of this Directive and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals for its review in accordance with the principles of fair taxation of the digital sector. In its report the Commission should assess, notably, - the impact of DST on Member States’ revenues; - the impact on the internal market as a whole, with particular regard to possible distortion of competition between companies subject to the new rules laid down in this Directive; - the need to increase the scope to cover more digital activities and the rate of the DST; - the potential tax planning practices that were applied by entities to avoid paying the DST.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 a (new) Article 24a Review Clause Two years after...[the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission should make an assessment of the application of this Directive and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals for its review in accordance with the principles of fair taxation of the digital sector. Furthermore the Commission should assess, notably, the impact on the entities which were covered by the scope of the DST, the amount of tax paid in each Member State, the type of digital activities within the scope of this Directive and the kinds of taxable revenue, in addition to the rate applied and the potential tax planning practices that were applied by entities to avoid paying the DST.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 a (new) Article 24a Sunset clause This Directive shall cease to apply as soon as the two following Council Directives enter into application: (a) the Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence; and (b) the Council Directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base including the digital permanent establishment as proposed in the legislative resolution of the European Parliament of 15 March 2018 on the proposal for a Council directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 b (new) Article 24b Reporting obligations Member States shall report every year to the Commission relevant figures and information on the payment of the DST by entities, the functioning of the OSS and the cooperation with other Member States for tax collection and payment.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 c (new) Article 24c Review Three years after...[the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall conduct an assessment of the application of this Directive and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied, if appropriate, by proposals for its review. The report shall assess, in particular, the entities covered by the scope of this Directive, the amount of tax paid in each Member State and the functioning of the OSS.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 a (new) Article 25a Sunset Clause The provisions laid down in this directive shall automatically cease to apply in the following cases: - if a permanent and comprehensive solution1a has entered into force, or - if no permanent and comprehensive solution is in place, automatically by 31 December 2025. In case an agreement on a permanent and comprehensive solution has been reached, this regulation shall cease to apply on the day the permanent and comprehensive solution becomes applicable. _________________ 1a Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence (2018/0072 (CNS)) or any other measure of similar nature or effect.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 a (new) Article 26a Sunset clause This Directive shall expire on 1 January 2025. At least 24 months before 1 January 2025, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council assessing the progress made on developing and applying the revisions to the international corporate tax system at OECD level to adapt it to the challenges arising from digitalisation and on the application of this Directive and shall, if appropriate, present a proposal to amend this Directive.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 a (new) Article 26a Sunset clause The provisions of this Directive shall be applicable until the Proposal for a Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence (COM(2018) 147 final) or the Proposals for a Council Directive on a Common Corporate Tax Base and on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, including the digital permanent establishment, come into effect or until [31 December 2021], whichever is earliest.
Amendment 30 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 31 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 32 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 33 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 34 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Recalls that the Commission’s claim that traditional companies pay an average of 23% of taxes while digital companies only around 10% of taxes is not based on real observed data, but rather on a ZEW-simulation from 2016 which considers a “hypothetical investment project” (ZEW 2016; p. 9). Notably, the lead author of the study has distanced himself from the Commission’s proposal. Similarly, a recent study by Copenhagen Economics (p. 6) outlines that, for example, “[i]n Germany, a digital company faces a higher effective tax rate of 25% against 21% for a traditional company. In the absence of accelerated R&D depreciation allowances it would have been 30%.” Several studies point to the fact that the challenges in international taxation, e.g. profit shifting and tax avoidance practices, which indeed can distort competition, prevail for all types of companies and business models, irrespective of whether they are digital, less digital or non-digital.
Amendment 35 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Recalls that even if the underlying justification for the DST could be substantiated by real-world observations, the proposal would still be fundamentally problematic: 1) the contribution that users of digital interfaces make to value creation can hardly be determined on the basis of objective criteria; 2) the value of a service is determined only by the coincidence of supply and demand; 3) producers of traditional goods, particularly SMEs, can also sell their products in other countries without being substantially physically present. Therefore, the principle that the place of taxation must correspond to the place of value added justifies any arbitrary tax intervention and is likely to evoke significant retaliatory measures by foreign governments. Retaliatory measures, e.g. import tariffs and destination-based taxes, will impact on EU exporters’ competitiveness in export markets and negatively impact on EU Member States’ public budgets.
Amendment 36 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Recalls that the assumption underlying the Commission proposal is that companies in the digital space do not pay their share of taxes, or they want to see companies that engage in aggressive tax practices to be taxed appropriately. The introduction of a digital tax will not prevent any company from paying their taxes on profits where it is most lucrative for them. Introducing the DST does not at all close gaps in the present tax regime, nor does it shut down tax havens. At the same time, a DST could lead to new tax avoidance strategies, whereby companies above the minimum threshold could separate or downsize their components. Accordingly, the digital services tax would not at all level the playing field for digital, less digital or non-digital corporations.
Amendment 37 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Recalls that the OECD’s digital economy group has concluded after a two-year period of studying the topic that it was impossible to ring-fence the “digital economy” considering that digitalisation has permeated nearly all industries and sectors: “[b]ecause the digital economy is increasingly becoming the economy itself, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to ring-fence the digital economy from the rest of the economy for tax purposes.” (OECD 2015; p.11) Ring-fencing would require strong political value judgements about the legitimacy of certain business models and might open the door for increased state interventionism in Europe’s economies. It would also stand in conflict with the Treaty of Lisbon, stating that the Union “shall promote scientific and technological advance.” (Article3).
Amendment 38 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 3 f (new) 3f. Recalls that the Commission assumes that the digitised companies concerned will largely cover the costs. This is not supported by empirical research on the price effects of comparable tax increases – for both taxes on corporate profit and taxes on corporate sales. As concerns the Commission’s proposal to tax corporate revenues, companies that make losses or operate on low margins will have no choice but to pass on the costs.
Amendment 39 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 3 g (new) 3g. Recalls that work is currently ongoing at the OECD to find a solution to taxing the digital economy that is in line with OECD principles and international law and can be agreed to by the G20. Supports a global solution awaiting the OECD proposal. Requests that the Commission presents a proposal to Parliament based on the OECD's proposal for a global solution.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) The global economy is rapidly becoming digital and, as a result, new ways of doing business have emerged. Digital companies are characterised by the fact that their operations are strongly linked to the internet. In particular, digital business models rely to a large extent on the ability to conduct activities remotely and with limited or no physical
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) The current corporate taxation rules were mainly developed during the 20th century for traditional businesses. They are based on the idea that taxation should take place where value is created. However, the application of the current rules to the digital economy has led to a misalignment between the place where profits are taxed and the place where value is created, notably in the case of business models heavily reliant on user participation. Digitalisation has changed the role of users, allowing them to become increasingly involved in the value creation process. It has therefore become evident that the current corporate tax rules for taxing the profits of the digital economy are
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The objective is to close the gap between taxation of digital revenues and traditional revenues. Currently, on average, digital businesses face an effective tax rate of only 9.5%, compared to 23.2% for traditional business models1a. A taxation system must be fair and beneficial to society as a whole. There should be a level playing field for all companies operating in the Single Market. _________________ 1a Source: Computations from the Impact Assessment of the European Commission, based on ZEW (2016, 2017) and ZEW et al.(2017).
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) EU should focus on creating a more attractive business environment in order to achieve a well-functioning Digital Single Market while waiting for a global solution on taxing the digital economy;
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 b (new) (2b) The underlying assumption of “under taxation” of digital companies can be questioned. An impact assessment from Copenhagen Economics (The proposed EU digital services tax: effects on welfare, growth and revenue) notes that a major factor to digital companies lower effective tax rate is individual countries beneficial research and development regimes as well as fundamental difference in business models;
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) That review constitutes an important element of the Digital Single Market24
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) That review constitutes an important element of the Digital Single Market24
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Digitalisation affects the whole economy with many firms using multi- channel models; thus, instead of creating special regimes for digital businesses, international tax rules should be reformed, based on a principle of neutrality between different business models, both digital and non-digital, and regardless of the extent or form of digitalisation, including multi-channel models, recognising the economic reality businesses operate in today.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new) (3b) In particular, this means reforming the definition of a permanent establishment to be more in line with the concept of a permanent establishment as defined in the 2010 UN model tax convention.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) In its Communication "A Fair and Efficient Tax System in the European Union for the Digital Single Market"25 adopted on 21 September 2017, the Commission identified the challenges that the digital economy posed for existing tax rules, and committed to analyse the policy options available. The ECOFIN Council conclusions of 5 December 201726 invited the Commission to adopt proposals responding to the challenges of taxing profits in the digital economy, while taking note also of the interest expressed by many Member States for temporary measures aimed at revenues resulting from digital activities in the Union that would remain outside the scope of double tax conventions.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Given the problem of taxing the digital economy is of a global nature, the ideal approach would be to find a multilateral, international solution to it. The Commission is actively engaged in the international debate for that reason. Work at the OECD is currently ongoing. However, progress at international level is challenging. Hence, action is being taken to adapt the corporate tax rules at Union level27 and to encourage agreements to be reached with non-Union jurisdictions28 , so that the corporate tax framework can be made to fit the new digital business models. There is a common interest in maintaining a coherent yet relevant set of international rules. Therefore, coherence with the BEPS Inclusive Framework should be ensured, given the absence of consensus on the merits for interim measures. _________________ 27 Proposal for a Council Directive laying
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Given the problem of taxing the digital economy is of a global nature, the ideal approach would be to find a multilateral, international solution to it. The Commission is actively engaged in the international debate for that reason. Work at the OECD, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the United Nations (UN) and the World Bank Group (WBG), which form the platform for Collaboration on Tax is currently ongoing. However, progress at international level is challenging. Hence, action is being taken to adapt the corporate tax rules at Union level27 and to encourage agreements to be reached with non-Union jurisdictions28 , so that the corporate tax framework can be made to fit the new digital business models. _________________ 27 Proposal for a Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence (COM(2018) 147 final). 28 Commission Recommendation relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence (C(2018) 1650 final).
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Notwithstanding the difficulties of reaching a global agreement, such an agreement should still be pursued with great effort. Progress on the OECD level has been slow and results have been disappointing. As called for in the European Parliament’s inquiry committee into money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion (PANA) and in its special committee on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (TAXE2), an empowered UN tax body should thus be installed to serve as the forum for debates and discussions on said agreement and other matters related to the international tax system.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The tax challenges stemming from the digitalization of the economy is a global issue requiring a global solution;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 b (new) (5b) The correct forum for tax challenges stemming from the digitalization is within the OECD;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 c (new) (5c) This proposal deviates from well- established principles of international taxation;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 d (new) (5d) It is unlikely that the OECD would adopt the same permanent establishment definition as the EU;
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 e (new) (5e) There is a risk that the EU system of a permanent establishment definition will part way from the OECD system and result in different definitions;
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 f (new) (5f) The EU system of a permanent establishment definition will develop through judgements from the ECJ while the definition applied in the rest of the world will instead develop through international consensus expressed by the OECD;
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 g (new) (5g) The permanent establishment definition has developed through a dynamic procedure within the OECD. By deviating from this procedure, the complexity would multiply;
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Pending such action, which may take time to adopt and implement, Member States face pressure to act on this issue, given the risk that their corporate tax bases are being significantly eroded over time. Uncoordinated measures taken by Member States individually can fragment the Single Market and distort competition, hampering the development of new digital solutions and the Union's competitiveness as a whole. This is why it is necessary to adopt a harmonised approach on an interim solution that will tackle this issue in a targeted way until a comprehensive solution is in place. In light of the fact, that the interim solution constitutes a severe deviation from the usual system of corporate taxation, the interim solution shall be temporarily restricted in order to avoid that it becomes permanent by accident. Therefore a sunset clause is introduced that would result in the provisions of this Directive automatically ceasing to apply by 31 December 2025 if no permanent and comprehensive solution has been found.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Pending such action, which may take time to adopt and implement, Member States face pressure to act on this issue, given the risk that their corporate tax bases are being significantly eroded over time. Uncoordinated measures taken by Member States individually can fragment the Single Market and distort competition, hampering the development of new digital solutions and the Union's competitiveness as a whole. This is why it is necessary to adopt a harmonised approach on an interim solution that will tackle this issue in a targeted way until a comprehensive solution is in place. However, considering the limited revenues generated by the DST and the potentially adverse effects of such a taxation on revenues, it should be recalled that the aforementioned comprehensive solution should be setup swiftly.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Pending such action, which may take time to adopt and implement, Member States face pressure to act on this issue, given the risk that their corporate tax bases are being significantly eroded over time. Uncoordinated measures taken by Member States individually can fragment the Single Market and distort competition, hampering the development of new digital solutions and the Union's competitiveness as a whole. This is why it is necessary to adopt a harmonised approach on an interim solution
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) If this proposal for an interim solution does not result in an agreement and therefore fails to eliminate the risks of fragmentation of the Single Market and of distortion of competition, the European Commission should issue a new proposal based on Article 116 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, whereby the European Parliament and the Council act in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure to issue the necessary directives. This is essential to come to an agreement without delay in order to tackle this issue and to avoid the multiplication of unilateral national digital taxes by Member States. If necessary, a change of legal basis should therefore be envisaged.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The interim solution should therefore cease to exist as soon as an agreement on international level has been found and in any case no later than 1 January 2025. To avoid distortion of the Single Market, Member States should after 1 January 2025 (or after an agreement on international level has been found) terminate all laws which were necessary to comply with this Directive and avoid gold plating of the agreement found on international level.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) That interim solution should establish the common system of a digital services tax ('DST') on revenues resulting from the supply of
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) That interim solution should establish the common system of a digital services tax ('DST') on revenues resulting from the supply of certain digital services by certain entities. It should be an easy-to- implement measure targeting the revenues stemming from the supply of digital services, the supply of online content, such as applications, music, videos, text and games, and the online sale of goods and services via digital interfaces where users contribute significantly to the process of value creation. Such factor (user value creation) also underpins the action with respect to corporate tax rules, as described in recital (5).
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) That interim solution should establish the common system of a digital services tax ('DST') on revenues resulting from the supply of certain digital services by certain entities. It should be an easy-to- implement measure targeting the revenues stemming from the supply of digital services, online content and the sale of goods or services which are sold via a digital interface where users contribute significantly to the process of value
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) With the proposed Digital Services Tax, there is a great risk of creating unfair taxation with unforeseeable consequences;
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 b (new) (7b) This proposal explicitly changes the allocation of tax revenues between countries. The proposals by the Commission constitute a fundamental change to the international corporate tax system;
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 c (new) (7 c) The proposal regarding a Significant Digital Presence would inevitably result in two parallel systems, which would be extremely costly and associated with great uncertainty for the taxpayers;
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 d (new) (7d) The proposed Digital Services Tax is a tax on turnover instead of on profits. This deviates from fundamental principles of international taxation;
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) DST should be applied to revenues resulting from the provision of
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) DST should be applied to revenues resulting from the provision of
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) In particular, taxable revenues should be those resulting from the provision of the following digital services: (i) the placing on a digital interface of advertising targeted at users of that interface; (ii) the making available of multi-sided digital
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) In particular, taxable revenues should be those resulting from the provision of the following
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) In particular, taxable revenues should be those resulting from the provision of the following services: (i) the placing on a digital interface of advertising targeted at users of that interface; (ii) the making available of multi-sided digital interfaces which allow users to find other users and to interact with them, and which may also facilitate the provision of underlying supplies of goods or services directly between users (sometimes referred to as "intermediation" services); and (iii) the transmission of data collected about users and generated from such users' activities on digital interfaces; (iv) the supply of digital content such as applications, music, videos, texts or games; (v) the online sale of goods or services via digital interfaces. If no revenues are obtained from the supply of such goods or services, there should be no DST liability. Other revenues obtained by the entity providing such services but not directly stemming from such supplies should also fall outside the scope of the tax.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Services consisting in the placing on a digital interface of a client's advertising targeted at users of that interface should not be defined by reference to who owns the digital interface through which the advertising appears on a user's device, but rather by reference to the entity responsible for enabling the advertising to appear on that interface. This is because the value for a business placing a client's advertising on a digital interface lies with user traffic and the user data which is typically taken into account for the purposes of the placement, regardless of whether the interface belongs to the business itself or to a third party who is renting out the digital space where the advertisement will appear. However, it should be clarified that in cases where the supplier of the advertising service and the owner of the digital interface are different entities, the latter should not be considered to have provided a taxable service for DST purposes. This is in order to avoid possible cascading effects and double taxation. Moreover, the DST as proposed will require companies to keep significant volume of user data to be able to commute tax in each Member State, an approach that could not be in compliance with data protection safeguards.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Services provided by multi-sided digital interfaces should be defined by reference to their capacity to enable users to find other users and to interact with them. The differential aspect of multi-sided digital interfaces is that they allow a user interaction which could not take place without the interface matching users with each other (in other words, the interface allows users to get in touch with other users). Some services typically referred to as communication or payment services, such as instant messaging services, e-mail services or e-payment services, may also be seen as facilitating the interaction between users through a digital interface, but users cannot usually get in touch with each other unless they have already established contact by other means. The revenues resulting from the supply of communication or payment services should therefore remain outside the scope of the tax because such suppliers do not operate as a marketplace, but rather produce support software or other information technology instruments allowing customers to reach out to other persons with whom they already have a relationship in most cases. However, if these services, such as e-mail services, are creating further value thanks to the exploitation, transmission or sale of users’ data, these revenues should fall within the scope of DST.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) For cases involving multi-sided digital interfaces that facilitate an underlying supply of goods or services directly between users of the interface, the underlying transactions and the revenues obtained by users from those transactions should remain
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13)
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) For cases involving multi-sided
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Services consisting in the supply of digital content by an entity through a digital interface should be
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Services consisting in the supply of digital content by an entity through a digital interface should be
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Services consisting in the supply of digital content by an entity through a digital interface should initially be excluded from the scope of the tax, regardless of whether the digital content is owned by that entity or that entity has acquired the rights to distribute it. Even if some sort of interaction between the recipients of such digital content may be allowed and therefore the supplier of such services could be seen as making available a multi-
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Services consisting in the supply of digital content by an entity through a
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) Digital content should be defined to mean data supplied in digital form, such as computer programmes, applications, games, music, videos or texts, irrespective of whether they are accessed through downloading or streaming, and other than the data represented by a digital interface itself. This is to capture the different forms which digital content can take when acquired by a user
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) It can be questioned whether a jurisdiction has a right to tax income if there is no physical footprint meaning that the infrastructure of the relevant jurisdiction is not utilized;
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 b (new) (15b) Digital companies tend to invest less in buildings and machinery than regular companies do;
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) The service described in recital (14)
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Taxable services consisting in the exploitation, transmission or sale of data collected about users should cover
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Taxable services consisting in the transmission of data collected about users should cover only data which has been generated from such users' activities in digital interfaces, but not data which has been generated from sensors or other means and collected digitally. This is because the services within the scope of DST should be those using digital interfaces as a way to create user input which they monetise, rather than services using interfaces only as a way to transmit data generated otherwise. DST should therefore not be a tax on the collection of data, or the use of data collected by a business for the internal purposes of that business, or the sharing of data collected by a business with other parties for no
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) (17a) This report should focus on taxation based on user value creation rather than expanding the remit of this proposal to the sale of data.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) Only certain entities should qualify as taxable persons for the purposes of DST, regardless of whether they are established in a Member State or in a non-Union jurisdiction. In particular, an entity should qualify as a taxable person only if
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) Only certain entities should qualify as taxable persons for the purposes of DST, regardless of whether they are established in a Member State or in a non-Union jurisdiction. In particular, an entity should qualify as a taxable person only if it meets
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) Only certain entities should qualify as taxable persons for the purposes of DST, regardless of whether they are established in a Member State or in a non-Union jurisdiction. In particular, an entity should qualify as a taxable person only if it meets
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 source: 629.512
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
council/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3646*&MEET_DATE=06/11/2018New
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/calendar/?Category=meeting&Page=1&daterange=&dateFrom=2018-11-06&dateTo=2018-11-06 |
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/5 |
Old
New
|
docs/6 |
Old
New
|
docs/7 |
Old
New
|
docs/8 |
Old
New
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/2/docs |
|
events/4/summary/14 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/5/docs/0/title |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Go to the page |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/summary/21 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31902&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=31902 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
ECON/8/12610 |
procedure/legal_basis |
Old
New
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 113 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31902&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2019-44-TA-8-2018-0523_en.docx |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/3/date |
Old
2018-05-13T00:00:00New
2018-05-14T00:00:00 |
docs/4/date |
Old
2018-06-27T00:00:00New
2018-06-28T00:00:00 |
docs/5/date |
Old
2018-08-01T00:00:00New
2018-08-02T00:00:00 |
docs/6/date |
Old
2018-06-03T00:00:00New
2018-06-04T00:00:00 |
docs/7/date |
Old
2018-05-17T00:00:00New
2018-05-18T00:00:00 |
docs/8/date |
Old
2019-01-10T00:00:00New
2019-01-11T00:00:00 |
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/instrument |
Directive
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Awaiting final decision
|
procedure/subtype |
Legislation
|
procedure/type |
CNS - Consultation procedure
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/instrument |
Directive
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Awaiting final decision
|
procedure/subtype |
Legislation
|
procedure/type |
CNS - Consultation procedure
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148 |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0148 |
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)625132New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)625132 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-627911_EN.html
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-629512_EN.html
|
events/5/docs |
|
docs/6/date |
Old
2018-05-14T00:00:00New
2018-05-13T00:00:00 |
docs/7/date |
Old
2018-06-28T00:00:00New
2018-06-27T00:00:00 |
docs/8/date |
Old
2018-08-02T00:00:00New
2018-08-01T00:00:00 |
docs/9/date |
Old
2018-06-04T00:00:00New
2018-06-03T00:00:00 |
docs/10/date |
Old
2018-05-18T00:00:00New
2018-05-17T00:00:00 |
docs/11/date |
Old
2019-01-11T00:00:00New
2019-01-10T00:00:00 |
events/1/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
events/7/body |
EP
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.911
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.512
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.911New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.911 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.512New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.512 |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0428_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0428_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181212&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181212&type=CRE |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0523_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0523_EN.html |
docs/2/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0428&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0428_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0523New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0523_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/8/12610New
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting final decision |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2018-05-31T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/2 |
|
committees/0/date |
2018-05-31T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
links/Research document |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
ECON/8/12610
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
3.30.06 Information and communication technologiesNew
3.30.06 Information and communication technologies, digital technologies |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|