Progress: Awaiting final decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | INTA | MARTIN David ( S&D) | KELLY Seán ( PPE), KAMALL Syed ( ECR), TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon ( ALDE), JADOT Yannick ( Verts/ALE), BEGHIN Tiziana ( EFDD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 207, TFEU 218-p6a
Legal Basis:
TFEU 207, TFEU 218-p6aSubjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 436 votes to 203, with 30 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part.
Parliament gave its consent to conclusion of the agreement. It also adopted a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council Decision on the conclusion of the agreement.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by David MARTIN (S&D, UK) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament give its consent to conclusion of the agreement.
The agreement aims to enhance the investment climate between the two parties. It will ensure a high level of investment protection, while safeguarding the EU’s and Singapore’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment.
It is important to highlight that this agreement will replace the existing bilateral investment treaties between 13 EU Member States and Singapore. Such treaties are based on outdated investment protection provisions and feature the controversial investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS).
However, regrettably, the agreement still misses provisions on investors’ obligations which should be strengthened according to Members.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to approve the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council can adopt the act only if the European Parliament has approved it.
BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council decision, a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore has been signed.
The fast-growing Southeast Asian economies, with their 600 million consumers and a rapidly rising middle class, are key markets for European Union exporters and investors. With a total EUR 208 billion of trade in goods and EUR 77 billion of trade in services (2016), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) taken as a whole is the EU’s third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China.
Within the ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest trade partner , accounting for just under a third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services and about two-thirds of investment between the two regions.
CONTENT: the Council's draft decision aims at approving, on behalf of the Union, the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. The Agreement aims to enhance the investment climate between the two parties. It will ensure a high level of investment protection, while safeguarding the EU’s and Singapore’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment.
In accordance with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the IPA:
ensures that EU investors and their investments in Singapore will be granted fair and equitable treatment and not be discriminated against compared to Singaporean investments that are in like situations; protects EU investors and their investments in Singapore from expropriation , unless it is for public purposes, in accordance with due process, on a non-discriminatory basis and against payment of prompt, adequate, and effective compensation according to fair market value of the expropriated investment; offer investors the option of a modern and reformed investment dispute resolution mechanism and sets up a standing international and fully independent dispute resolution system, consisting of permanent First Instance and Appeal Tribunals that will conduct dispute settlement proceedings in a transparent and impartial manner
The EU-Singapore FTA and IPA include institutional provisions that lay down a structure for implementing bodies to continuously monitor the implementation, operation and impact of the agreements. The agreements are an integral part of the overall bilateral relation between the EU and Singapore as governed by the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA), and the structures mentioned will form part of a common institutional framework with the PCA.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.
BACKGROUND: the dynamically growing Southeast Asian economies, with their over 600 million consumers and a rapidly rising middle class, are key markets for European Union exporters and investors. With a total EUR 208 billion of trade in goods and EUR 77 billion of trade in services (2016), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) taken as a whole is the EU’s third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China.
At the same time, a total EUR 263 billion foreign direct investment stock (2016) in the ASEAN makes the EU the first foreign direct investor in the ASEAN, while the ASEAN as a whole is in its turn the second largest Asian foreign direct investor in the EU – with a total foreign direct investment stock of EUR 116 billion (2016).
Within the ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest partner, accounting for slightly under one-third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services, and roughly two-thirds of investments between the two regions. Over 10 000 EU companies are established in Singapore and use it as a hub to serve the whole Pacific Rim.
On 23 April 2007, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a region-to-region Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Member States of the ASEAN. On 12 September 2011, the Council authorised the Commission to extend the on-going negotiations with Singapore to cover also investment protection, based on a new EU competence under the Lisbon Treaty.
On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2007, and supplemented in 2011 to include investment protection, the Commission has negotiated with Singapore an ambitious and comprehensive FTA and an Investment Protection Agreement (IPA), with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners to develop.
From the date of its entry into force, the EU-Singapore IPA will replace and supersede the bilateral investment treaties between the Republic of Singapore and EU Member States that are listed in the IPA.
CONTENT: the Commission called on the Council to adopt the Decision to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part.
Main aim of the IPA : it aims to:
enhance the investment climate between the EU and Singapore; bring benefits to European investors by ensuring a high level protection of their investments in Singapore, while at the same time safeguarding the EU’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment; protect EU investors and their investments in Singapore from expropriation, unless it is for public purposes, in accordance with due process, on a non-discriminatory basis and against payment of prompt, adequate, and effective compensation according to fair market value of the expropriated investment; offer investors the option of a modern and reformed investment dispute resolution mechanism. This system ensures that investment protection rules are adhered to and seeks to strike a balance between protecting investors in a transparent manner and safeguarding the right of a State to regulate in order to pursue public policy objectives; set up a standing international and fully independent dispute resolution system , consisting of permanent First Instance and Appeal Tribunals that will conduct dispute settlement proceedings in a transparent and impartial manner.
In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission secured the following:
liberalisation of services : the FTA includes the comprehensive liberalisation of services and investment markets, including cross-cutting rules on licensing and for the mutual recognition of diplomas, and sector specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses; procurement : it also lays down new tendering opportunities for EU bidders, and especially in the utilities market where there are many leading EU suppliers; trade barriers : the FTA removes technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade in goods, such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards familiar in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies. Based on international standards, a more trade-facilitative regime for the approval of European meat exports to Singapore. Singapore’s commitment not to raise its tariffs (which are currently mostly not applied on a voluntary basis) on imports from the EU, as well as cheaper access of European businesses and consumers to products made in Singapore; GI protection : a TRIPs-plus level of protection to EU GIs following their registration in Singapore once Singapore has established a GI register has been proposed; sustainable development : the FTA includes a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how social partners and civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring; dispute mechanism : a swift dispute resolution mechanisms is proposed through either panel arbitration or with the help of a mediator.
Committee : the institutional chapter of the IPA establishes a committee with the main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the agreement. Among other tasks, the committee may, subject to the completion of each side’s respective legal requirements and procedures, decide to appoint the Members of the ICS Tribunals, fix their monthly retainer and fees, and adopt binding interpretations of the agreement.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the EU-Singapore FTA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues . It is estimated that foregone duties could reach an amount of EUR 248.8 million upon full implementation of the agreement. The estimate is based on average imports projected for 2025 in the absence of an agreement and represents the annual loss in revenues resulting from the elimination of EU tariffs on imports from Singapore. The EU-Singapore IPA is expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures . The agreement will be the EU’s second (after the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) to incorporate the Investment Court System (ICS) for the resolution of disputes between investors and states. An amount of EUR 200 000 of additional yearly expenditure is foreseen from 2018 onwards (subject to the entry into force of the agreement) to finance the permanent structure comprising a First Instance and an Appeal Tribunal.
Preparatory document
PURPOSE: to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.
BACKGROUND: the dynamically growing Southeast Asian economies, with their over 600 million consumers and a rapidly rising middle class, are key markets for European Union exporters and investors. With a total EUR 208 billion of trade in goods and EUR 77 billion of trade in services (2016), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) taken as a whole is the EU’s third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China.
At the same time, a total EUR 263 billion foreign direct investment stock (2016) in the ASEAN makes the EU the first foreign direct investor in the ASEAN, while the ASEAN as a whole is in its turn the second largest Asian foreign direct investor in the EU – with a total foreign direct investment stock of EUR 116 billion (2016).
Within the ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest partner, accounting for slightly under one-third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services, and roughly two-thirds of investments between the two regions. Over 10 000 EU companies are established in Singapore and use it as a hub to serve the whole Pacific Rim.
On 23 April 2007, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a region-to-region Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Member States of the ASEAN. On 12 September 2011, the Council authorised the Commission to extend the on-going negotiations with Singapore to cover also investment protection, based on a new EU competence under the Lisbon Treaty.
On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2007, and supplemented in 2011 to include investment protection, the Commission has negotiated with Singapore an ambitious and comprehensive FTA and an Investment Protection Agreement (IPA), with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners to develop.
From the date of its entry into force, the EU-Singapore IPA will replace and supersede the bilateral investment treaties between the Republic of Singapore and EU Member States that are listed in the IPA.
CONTENT: the Commission called on the Council to adopt the Decision to conclude the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Singapore of the other part.
Main aim of the IPA : it aims to:
enhance the investment climate between the EU and Singapore; bring benefits to European investors by ensuring a high level protection of their investments in Singapore, while at the same time safeguarding the EU’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment; protect EU investors and their investments in Singapore from expropriation, unless it is for public purposes, in accordance with due process, on a non-discriminatory basis and against payment of prompt, adequate, and effective compensation according to fair market value of the expropriated investment; offer investors the option of a modern and reformed investment dispute resolution mechanism. This system ensures that investment protection rules are adhered to and seeks to strike a balance between protecting investors in a transparent manner and safeguarding the right of a State to regulate in order to pursue public policy objectives; set up a standing international and fully independent dispute resolution system , consisting of permanent First Instance and Appeal Tribunals that will conduct dispute settlement proceedings in a transparent and impartial manner.
In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission secured the following:
liberalisation of services : the FTA includes the comprehensive liberalisation of services and investment markets, including cross-cutting rules on licensing and for the mutual recognition of diplomas, and sector specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses; procurement : it also lays down new tendering opportunities for EU bidders, and especially in the utilities market where there are many leading EU suppliers; trade barriers : the FTA removes technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade in goods, such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards familiar in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies. Based on international standards, a more trade-facilitative regime for the approval of European meat exports to Singapore. Singapore’s commitment not to raise its tariffs (which are currently mostly not applied on a voluntary basis) on imports from the EU, as well as cheaper access of European businesses and consumers to products made in Singapore; GI protection : a TRIPs-plus level of protection to EU GIs following their registration in Singapore once Singapore has established a GI register has been proposed; sustainable development : the FTA includes a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how social partners and civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring; dispute mechanism : a swift dispute resolution mechanisms is proposed through either panel arbitration or with the help of a mediator.
Committee : the institutional chapter of the IPA establishes a committee with the main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the agreement. Among other tasks, the committee may, subject to the completion of each side’s respective legal requirements and procedures, decide to appoint the Members of the ICS Tribunals, fix their monthly retainer and fees, and adopt binding interpretations of the agreement.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the EU-Singapore FTA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues . It is estimated that foregone duties could reach an amount of EUR 248.8 million upon full implementation of the agreement. The estimate is based on average imports projected for 2025 in the absence of an agreement and represents the annual loss in revenues resulting from the elimination of EU tariffs on imports from Singapore. The EU-Singapore IPA is expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures . The agreement will be the EU’s second (after the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) to incorporate the Investment Court System (ICS) for the resolution of disputes between investors and states. An amount of EUR 200 000 of additional yearly expenditure is foreseen from 2018 onwards (subject to the entry into force of the agreement) to finance the permanent structure comprising a First Instance and an Appeal Tribunal.
Preparatory document
Documents
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0090/2019
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Go to the page
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A8-0054/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE630.487
- Committee draft report: PE627.720
- Document attached to the procedure: 07980/2018
- Legislative proposal published: 07979/2018
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2018)0195
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Preparatory document: COM(2018)0194
- Preparatory document: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Preparatory document: COM(2018)0194
- Preparatory document: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE627.720
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE630.487
- Document attached to the procedure: 07980/2018
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2018)0195 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Preparatory document: COM(2018)0194 Go to the pageEur-Lex
Votes
A8-0054/2019 - David Martin - Vote: procédure d'approbation 13/02/2019 12:10:54.000 #
PL | GB | ES | RO | DE | BG | SK | HR | FI | CZ | HU | DK | PT | LT | MT | NL | LV | BE | LU | EE | SE | SI | EL | IE | CY | ?? | AT | IT | FR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
46
|
63
|
50
|
28
|
84
|
16
|
12
|
11
|
12
|
19
|
13
|
12
|
20
|
10
|
6
|
25
|
8
|
18
|
6
|
4
|
16
|
8
|
15
|
7
|
2
|
1
|
18
|
66
|
71
|
|
PPE |
195
|
Poland PPEFor (19)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogusław SONIK, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Krzysztof HETMAN, Marek PLURA, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
2
|
Spain PPEFor (16)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, Gabriel MATO, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Pilar AYUSO, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
Germany PPEFor (31)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hermann WINKLER, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Stefan GEHROLD, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN, Werner LANGEN
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (7) |
Slovakia PPE |
5
|
3
|
Czechia PPEFor (6) |
Hungary PPEFor (8) |
1
|
Portugal PPEFor (6)Against (1) |
2
|
3
|
Netherlands PPEFor (5) |
4
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
Slovenia PPEFor (4)Against (1) |
2
|
3
|
5
|
France PPEFor (19)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
|
||||
ALDE |
64
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
1
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
|||||||||
ECR |
63
|
Poland ECRFor (16) |
United Kingdom ECRFor (17) |
1
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
|||||||||||||
S&D |
167
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
United Kingdom S&DFor (10)Against (7)Abstain (1) |
Spain S&DFor (12)Against (1) |
Romania S&DFor (10)Against (3) |
Germany S&DFor (10)Against (13) |
Bulgaria S&DAbstain (1) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (7)Against (1) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Sweden S&DFor (3)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
Italy S&DFor (14)Against (13)Abstain (1) |
12
|
||
EFDD |
35
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (11)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (12)Abstain (1) |
France EFDDFor (1)Against (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
18
|
Poland NIFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Greece NI |
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
35
|
2
|
United Kingdom ENFAgainst (1)Abstain (3) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
Italy ENFAgainst (6) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
43
|
1
|
8
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (3) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
France GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
47
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (3)Abstain (2) |
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (10)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (6) |
Amendments | Dossier |
7 |
2018/0095(NLE)
2018/11/12
INTA
7 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 5 – having regard to Rule
Amendment 2 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
source: 630.487
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/body |
Old
CSLNew
Council of the EU |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/summary/10 |
Legislative proposal
|
events/4/summary/5 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/5/docs/0/title |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Go to the page |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/summary/2 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32126&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=32126 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
INTA/8/12825 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DecisionNew
|
docs/1 |
|
events/1/date |
Old
2018-09-17T00:00:00New
2018-09-18T00:00:00 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/instrument |
Decision
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Awaiting final decision
|
procedure/subtype |
Consent by Parliament
|
procedure/type |
NLE - Non-legislative enactments
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/instrument |
Decision
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Awaiting final decision
|
procedure/subtype |
Consent by Parliament
|
procedure/type |
NLE - Non-legislative enactments
|
events/5/docs |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)628256New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)628256 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-PR-627720_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-630487_EN.html
|
events/1/date |
Old
2018-09-18T00:00:00New
2018-09-17T00:00:00 |
events/2/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
events/7/body |
EP
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.720
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.487
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0054_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0054_EN.html |
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/0/body |
EP
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0054&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0054_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0090New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0090_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links/Research document |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/instrument |
Decision
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting final decision |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
committees/0/date |
2018-05-16T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|