Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | JURI | DE GRANDES PASCUAL Luis ( PPE) | WÖLKEN Tiemo ( S&D), ZŁOTOWSKI Kosma ( ECR), CAVADA Jean-Marie ( ALDE), REDA Felix ( Verts/ALE), BOUTONNET Marie-Christine ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | WÖLKEN Tiemo ( S&D) | Christofer FJELLNER ( PPE), Urszula KRUPA ( ECR), Gesine MEISSNER ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | José BOVÉ ( Verts/ALE), Alessia Maria MOSCA ( S&D), Bolesław G. PIECHA ( ECR), Marietje SCHAAKE ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to stimulate the competitiveness of European producers of generic medicines and biosilimentaires products.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2019/933 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products.
CONTENT: this Regulation amends Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 in order to remove the competitive disadvantages faced by generic and biosimilar manufacturers established in the EU compared to manufacturers established outside the EU on world markets.
Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) are intellectual property rights that extend (by a maximum of five years) the patent protection of medicines that require extensive testing and clinical trials before they are allowed to be placed on the EU market. SPCs may put producers of generic and biosimilars medicines established in Europe at a disadvantage compared to companies established in third countries, which undermines innovation and job creation in Europe.
Indeed, during the SPC period of protection of the product in the EU, EU-based manufacturers of generic and/or biosimilar-related products cannot currently manufacture for any purpose, including export outside the EUto countries where SPC protection has expired or does not exist, while manufacturers based in those non-EU countries can do so.
Derogation for the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (SPC)
The Regulation introduces an exception to the protection granted to an original medicinal product by a protection certificate for export and/or storage purposes.
The aim of this Regulation is to promote the competitiveness of the Union, thereby enhancing growth and job creation in the internal market and contributing to a wider supply of products under uniform conditions, by allowing makers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union to make in the Union products, or medicinal products containing those products, for the purpose of export to third-country markets in which protection does not exist or has expired, thereby also helping those makers to compete effectively in those third-country markets.
This Regulation shall also allow such makers to make and store products, or medicinal products containing those products, in a Member State for a defined period pending the expiry of the certificate, for the purpose of entering the market of any Member State upon expiry of the corresponding certificate, thereby helping those makers to compete effectively in the Union immediately after protection has expired (‘EU day-one entry’).
Effects of the certificate
Waivers shall only apply if:
- generics or biosimilars are produced exclusively for export to third countries where the protection of the original medicinal product does not exist or has expired or for storage purposes during the last six months of the CCP's validity;
- the maker, through appropriate and documented means, notifies the authority in the Member State in which that making is to take place, and informs the certificate holder, of the required information no later than three months before the start date of the making in that Member State,
- the maker has duly informed all parties involved in the marketing of the product;
- the maker has affixed to the packaging of the product the specific logo provided for in the Regulation, which clearly indicates that the product is intended solely for export to third countries
Information to be provided
The information to be provided by the maker shall be as follows:
- the name and address of the maker;
- an indication of whether the making is for the purpose of export, for the purpose of storing, or for the purpose of both export and storing;
- the Member State in which the making and, if applicable, also the storing is to take place, and the Member State in which the first related act, if any, prior to that making is to take place;
- the number of the certificate granted in the Member State of making, and the number of the certificate granted in the Member State of the first related act, if any, prior to that making; and
- for medicinal products to be exported to third countries, the reference number of the marketing authorisation, or the equivalent of such authorisation, in each third country of export, as soon as it is publicly available.
The information provided to the certificate holder shall be used exclusively for the purposes of verifying whether the requirements of this Regulation have been met and, where applicable, initiating legal proceedings for non-compliance.
Member States may require that the certificate be subject to the payment of annual fees.
Application
Until 1 July, 2022, the amending regulation will affect only SPCs that are applied for on or after the date of entry into force of the regulation. From then on, the regulation will also affect SPCs applied for before the entry into force of the regulation, but which have become effective after the entry into force of the regulation.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 31.6.2019.
The European Parliament adopted by 572 votes to 63, with 22 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Derogation for the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (SPC)
The amendments to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) for medicinal products shall aim to boost the competitiveness of European producers of generic medicinal products and biosilimar products by introducing an exception for manufacturing for export purposes (manufacturing waiver) to the protection granted to an original medicine by a supplementary protection certificate (SPC).
Thanks to the waiver, EU-based makers of generics and biosimilars will be entitled to manufacture a generic or biosimilar version of an SPC-protected medicine during the term of the SPC if done exclusively for the purpose of exporting to a non-EU market where protection has expired or never existed.
This Regulation shall also allow such makers to make and store products, or medicinal products containing those products, in a Member State for a defined period pending the expiry of the certificate, for the purpose of entering the market of any Member State upon expiry of the corresponding certificate, thereby helping those makers to compete effectively in the Union immediately after protection has expired (‘EU day-one entry’).
Information to authorities and SPC holders
The exception shall apply if:
- generics or biosimilars are produced exclusively for export to third countries where protection of the original medicine does not exist or has expired or for storage purposes during the last six months before the expiry of the certificate;
- the maker has provided the information required by the regulation to both the authorities of the member state of production and to the holder of the SPC at least three months in advance;
- the maker has duly informed all those involved in the commercialisation of the product covered by the exception that the product can be put on the market only outside the EU;
- the maker has affixed to the packaging of the product the specific logo provided for by the regulation indicating clearly that it is only for export.
The information to be provided by the maker shall be as follows:
- the name and address of the maker;
- an indication of whether the making is for the purpose of export, for the purpose of storing, or for the purpose of both export and storing;
- the Member State in which the making and, if applicable, also the storing is to take place, and the Member State in which the first related act, if any, prior to that making is to take place;
- the number of the certificate granted in the Member State of making, and the number of the certificate granted in the Member State of the first related act, if any, prior to that making;
- for medicinal products to be exported to third countries, the reference number of the marketing authorisation, or the equivalent of such authorisation, in each third country of export, as soon as it is publicly available.
The information provided to the certificate holder shall be used exclusively for the purposes of verifying whether the requirements of this Regulation have been met and, where applicable, initiating legal proceedings for non-compliance.
Application
Until 1 July, 2022, the amending regulation will affect only SPCs that are applied for on or after the date of entry into force of the regulation. From then on, the regulation will also affect SPCs applied for before the entry into force of the regulation, but which have become effective after the entry into force of the regulation.
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the report by Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL (EPP, ES) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products.
As a reminder, the Commission proposal aims to amend Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the supplementary protection certificate (SPC) for medicinal products, with the aim of introducing the so-called 'export manufacturing waiver to SPC', thanks to which, in the future, EU-based companies will be entitled to manufacture a generic or biosimilar version of an SPC-protected medicine during the term of the certificate, if done exclusively for the purpose of exporting to a non-EU market where protection has expired or never existed.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows.
Objective
The amendments introduced clarify that only exports to third countries outside the Union would be covered by the exception and define more precisely the objectives that this proposal should achieve, namely to promote the competitiveness of generics and biosimilars producers in the Union, to enhance growth and job creation in the internal market and to contribute to a wider supply of products under uniform conditions.
This should enable producers to compete effectively on third country markets where complementary protection does not exist or has expired and to ensure EU-Day1 Entry of generic and biosimilar medicines into the Union market after expiry of the relevant supplementary protection certificate.
The amending Regulation would aim to eliminate the unintentional effects of a supplementary protection certificate, but not to the detriment of any other patent or intellectual property right existing in a Member State, so as to allow making of generic products, biosimilars and active ingredients for the purpose of export to third countries and of entry into the Union market immediately after expiry of the relevant supplementary protection certificate.
Information to authorities and SCP holders
Manufacturers would be required to provide certain information to the authority that issued the SPC in the Member State where manufacture is to take place. The manufacturer established in the Union should check that there is no protection or that it has expired in the exporting country, or that it is subject to limitations or exemptions in that country. To this end, Members have inserted a new standard form for notification to the authority in Annex I of the proposal.
In order to ensure a more robust and transparent implementation of the safeguards provided for in the Commission’s proposal, Members introduced an additional requirement to inform directly the SPC holders of the intention to manufacture a product under the exception.
This obligation is without prejudice to the protection of confidential or commercially sensitive information and aims at ensuring that the SPC holders have access to the necessary information in order to assess whether the conditions to benefit from the exception are respected and there are no infringements of their intellectual property rights.
Manufacturing acts would only fall within the scope of the exception if the manufacturer (i) has sent a notification to the competent industrial property authority of the Member State of manufacture and (ii) has informed the holder of the issued supplementary protection certificate of the name and address of the manufacturer and the number of the certificate in the Member State at the latest three months before the date of commencement of manufacturing in the Member State concerned.
Combating diversion
Members specified that the Regulation should not affect the rules on the unique identifier provided for in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161.
In the case of products manufactured for export to third countries, the manufacturer should ensure that a logo, in accordance with the model set out in Annex - I bis, is affixed to the outer packaging of the product or medicinal product.
Application
The exception provided for in the Regulation should only apply to certificates for which the basic patent expired on or after 1 January 2021. The date in question takes into account the need to provide for a sufficiently long transitional period to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates are not deprived of their acquired rights. The Regulation should not have any retroactive effect.
PURPOSE: to amend Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: a supplementary protection certificate (SPC) is an intellectual property right available in EU Member States that extends by up to five years the legal effects of a reference patent on a medicinal product that has been authorised by national or European regulatory authorities. A harmonised SPC system is sought to compensate for the loss of effective patent protection due to the time required in order to obtain marketing authorisation (including research and clinical trials). The EU legislation applicable to SPCs on medicinal products is Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 .
Reliance on SPC protection is significant and increasing. At the same time however, EU and global pharmaceutical markets are undergoing profound changes. Global demand for medicines has increased massively.
Alongside this, there is a shift towards an ever-greater market share for generics and biosimilars.
Although the EU has been a hub for pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) and production, its competitive position is under threat today. While Europe’s trading partners are increasingly involved in the manufacturing of generics and biosimilars, EU-based manufacturers of generics and/or biosimilars face a significant problem: during the SPC period of protection of the product in the EU, they cannot manufacture for any purpose, including export outside the EU to countries where SPC protection has expired or does not exist, while manufacturers based in those non-EU countries can do so.
This competitive disadvantage entails a risk of delocalisation of manufacturing outside of Europe, loss of investment opportunities, and a brake on further innovation and job creation in Europe. The certificate also makes it more difficult for EU manufacturers to enter the EU market immediately after its expiry, given that they are not in a position to build up production capacity until the protection provided by the certificate has lapsed.
The Commission proposed to amend the Union’s legislation on Supplementary Protection Certificates for medicinal products by introducing a so-called manufacturing exemption for export purposes (manufacturing waiver).
In its resolution of 26 May 2016 on the single market strategy, the European Parliament endorsed the need to take action on the EU SPC regime and urged the Commission to introduce and implement by 2019 an SPC manufacturing waiver to boost the competitiveness of the generics and biosimilars sector, but without undermining the market exclusivity granted under the SPC regime in protected markets.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option is the introduction of a targeted and narrow exception to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009. This option is expected to enhance the competitiveness of EU-based generic and biosimilars manufacturers in terms of exports during the SPC term, resulting in additional net sales of EU pharmaceuticals of up to EUR 1 billion per year. EU patients and health authorities would benefit from a strengthened and more timely supply of medicines (e.g. in terms of diversification of the supply). Additional savings to public spending in Member States on pharmaceuticals, potentially of the order of upwards of 4%, could materialise from increased competition between generics and biosimilars manufacturers in EU markets following SPC expiry in the Union.
CONTENT: the Commission proposes a targeted amendment to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 on the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products.
Concretely, the proposal:
it introduces an exception , to enable manufacturers of generics and biosimilars to manufacture such medicines for the purpose of exporting them outside the EU during the SPC protection term. This waiver will remove the competitive disadvantages EU-based manufacturers of generics and biosimilars are currently facing. This proposal leaves SPC protection fully intact as regards placing products on the EU market. SPC holders will keep their market exclusivity in Member States during the full SPC protection term; provides for ‘anti-diversion’ safeguards , notably a requirement to notify, ex ante , such manufacturing to independent national public bodies (which will hold the relevant information in a publicly accessible register) along with labelling requirements for products that are exported and due diligence requirements on the manufacturer vis-à-vis persons in its supply chain; makes the exception subject to the following conditions : the exception will apply only to SPCs that have not yet been granted, and only after a transitional period to accommodate pending applications. This transition will allow market players to take account of the new situation when making investment decisions. It will also give national authorities enough time to set up their arrangements for receiving notifications of the intention to make use of the manufacturing waiver.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)440
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2019/933
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 153 11.06.2019, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00052/2019/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0401/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE637.374
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2019)002691
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)002691
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE637.374
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0039/2019
- Committee opinion: PE628.707
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE630.706
- Committee opinion: PE627.040
- Committee draft report: PE629.542
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3800/2018
- Contribution: COM(2018)0317
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0240
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0241
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0242
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2018)0317
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0240
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0241
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0242
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3800/2018
- Committee draft report: PE629.542
- Committee opinion: PE627.040
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE630.706
- Committee opinion: PE628.707
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)002691
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE637.374
- Draft final act: 00052/2019/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)440
- Contribution: COM(2018)0317
Activities
- Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José Inácio FARIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Felix REDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudiu Ciprian TĂNĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lieve WIERINCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0039/2019 - Luis de Grandes Pascual - Am 32 17/04/2019 12:59:26.000 #
A8-0039/2019 - Luis de Grandes Pascual - Am 32 #
Amendments | Dossier |
556 |
2018/0161(COD)
2018/10/17
ENVI
214 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) So that anti-competitive practices can be avoided as far as possible, commercially sensitive information should not be included in the notification. The information required in the notification should therefore be in line with EU legislation on business confidentiality. In addition, this information must be treated in a strictly confidential manner by the titular holder of the certificate, who may use it only for the sole purpose of verifying that the manufacturer complies with the conditions for applying the exception.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The maker should also inform the certificate holder, in writing, of the intention to make a product pursuant to the exception. A notification form should be provided for this purpose, which will differ from the one used to notify the authority in that it will not contain confidential or commercially sensitive information. This information should be updated when appropriate.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The maker, or any person acting on its behalf, should notify, on a confidential basis, to the SPC Holder, its sole intention to manufacture under waiver for the relevant SPC, without any additional commercial sensitive and confidential information, in order to avoid a distortion of competition in the market.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 b (new) (13b) The notification should not include commercially sensitive information and confidential details of a company business plan, to limit any anti- competitive effects. To that end, the information required in the notification should notably comply with existing EU legislation and recommendations, such as Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on trade secrets and the EMA/HMA Guidance Document on the identification of commercially confidential information and personal data. For the same reasons, the notification and the information it contains should be treated as strictly confidential by the holder of the certificate and should not be used by the holder of the certificate for any other purpose than ensuring that the maker has complied with the scope and conditions of the exception.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on the maker as a condition for the exception to operate. The maker should be required to inform persons within its supply chain, through appropriate means, in particular contractual means, that the product is covered by the exception introduced by this Regulation and is intended for the exclusive purposes of Day-1 entry onto the Union market or of export. A maker who failed to comply with these due diligence requirements would not benefit from the exception, nor would any third party performing a related act in the same or a different Member State where a certificate conferring protection for the product was in force, and the holder of the relevant certificate would therefore be entitled to enforce its rights under the certificate.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on the maker as a condition for the exception to operate. The maker should be required to inform persons within its supply chain, through appropriate means, in particular contractual means, that the product is covered by the exception introduced by this Regulation and is intended for the exclusive purposes of export and day-1 entry. A maker who failed to comply with these due diligence requirements would not benefit from the exception, nor would any third party performing a related act in the same or a different Member State where a certificate conferring protection for the product was in force, and the holder of the relevant certificate would therefore be entitled to enforce its rights under the certificate.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on the maker as a condition for the exception to operate. The maker should be required to inform persons within its supply chain,
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The warning letter to the SPC Holder should not include commercially sensitive information and confidential details of a company business plan, to limit any anti-competitive effects. To that end, the information required in the warning letter should notably comply with existing EU legislation and recommendations, such as Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on trade secrets and the EMA/HMA Guidance Document on the identification of commercially confidential information and personal data. For the same reasons, the warning letter and the information it contains should be treated as strictly confidential by the holder of the certificate and should not be used by the holder of the certificate for any other purpose than ensuring that the maker has complied with the scope and conditions of the exception.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Furthermore, this Regulation should impose labelling requirements on the maker, in order to facilitate, by means of a logo, identification of the product as a product exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries. The making and related acts should only fall outside the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate if the product is labelled in this manner. This labelling obligation would be without prejudice to labelling requirements of third countries. Furthermore, a medicinal product bearing a Unique Identifier as per Articles 3(d) and 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU would indicate that the product is not exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries. Therefore, this regulation should prohibit a product exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries from bearing such Unique Identifier.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Furthermore, this Regulation should impose labelling requirements on the maker, in order to facilitate, by means of a logo, identification of the product as a product exclusively intended for the purposes of Day-1 entry onto the Union market after the expiry of the supplementary protection certificate or of export to third countries. The making and related acts should only fall outside the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate if the product is labelled in this manner. This labelling obligation would be without prejudice to labelling requirements of third countries.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Furthermore, this Regulation should impose labelling requirements on the maker, in order to facilitate, by means of a logo, identification of the product as a product exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries. The making
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new) (15a) The notification to the authority which granted the supplementary protection certificate and the information it contains should be kept confidential. Specific measures should be taken to protect such confidentiality. The authority may only disclose the information if disclosure is ordered by a court under specific circumstances.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) In view of the global economic context, intellectual property and incentive schemes should be considered more important than ever for creating an environment in which the pharmaceutical industry is encouraged to meet the current unmet medical needs, and to ensure that Europe remains an attractive place for investment in R&D and industrial development.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19)
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, and that the start of the application of the waiver is determined as objectively as possible, the exception provided for in this Regulation should only apply to certificates
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19)
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the exception provided for in this Regulation should only apply to certificates that are
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the exception provided for in this Regulation should only apply to certificates that are
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Regulation. Pursuant to paragraph 22 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201643, that evaluation should be based on the five criteria of effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and added value and should provide the basis for impact assessments of possible further measures. The evaluation should take into account exports to outside the Union and the ability of generics and especially biosimilars to enter markets in the Union as soon as possible after a certificate lapses. In particular, this evaluation should review the effectiveness of the exception in the light of the aim to restore a global level playing field for generic and biosimilar firms in the Union and a swifter entry of generic and especially biosimilar medicines onto the market after a certificate lapses. It should also study the impact of the exception on research and production of innovative medicines by holders of certificates in the Union and
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Regulation. Pursuant to paragraph 22 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201643 , that evaluation should be based on the five criteria of effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and added value and should provide the basis for impact assessments of possible further measures. The evaluation should take into account exports to outside the Union and the ability of generics and especially biosimilars to enter markets in the Union
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective, of
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective, of providing a level playing field for generic and biosimilar manufacturers with their competitors in third country markets where protection does not exist or has expired, to lay down rules
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective, of providing a level playing field for generic and biosimilar manufacturers with their competitors in third country markets where protection does not exist or has expired, to lay down rules
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate,
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate,
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate,
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate,
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate, by confining the exception to certificates
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate, by confining the exception to certificates
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall not confer protection against
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall not confer protection against
Amendment 144 #
2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall not confer protection against
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the act
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the act
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose(s) of export to third countries; and/or entry onto the market of Member States immediately after expiry of the certificate in those Member States; and/or
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose(s) of export to third countries; and/or entry onto the market of Member States immediately after expiry of the certificate in those Member States; and/or
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose(s) of export to third countries
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) an act of making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries, and for a limited storage before the expiry of the SPC finalised to the entry into the EU market; or
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) an act of making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries where protection for the product or medicinal product does not exist or has expired; or
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) an act of making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries where protection for the product or medicinal product does not exist or has expired; or
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purposes of export to third countries or for the Day- 1 entry onto the Union market after the expiry of the certificate; or
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purposes of export to third countries or entry onto the Union market immediately after expiry of the certificate; or
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph – 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries where no protection for the medicinal product exists or has expired; or
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (ia) making for the exclusive purpose of putting the product on the market after expiration of the SPC within period of 9 months before expiration of the SPC; or
Amendment 158 #
(ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making or for the actual export itself
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making or for the actual export itself
Amendment 163 #
(iia) not an act or activity for the purpose of import of medicinal products, or parts thereof, into the Union merely for the purposes of repackaging and re- exporting.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) not an act or activity for the purpose of import of medicinal products, or parts thereof, into the Union merely for the purposes of repackaging and re- exporting.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’)
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’)
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’)
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) the certificate holder is informed, in writing, by the maker, that a notification has been sent pursuant to paragraph 2(b) and is provided with the information listed in of paragraph 3 (c) and (f) of this article no later than 90 days before the start date of making in that Member State and in advance of any related act prior to that making that would otherwise be prohibited by the protection conferred by a certificate; the SPC holder should keep the warning letter and the information it contains strictly confidential and should not use them for any other purpose than ensuring that the maker has complied with the scope and conditions of the exception.
Amendment 178 #
(ba) the certificate holder is informed, in writing, by the maker, of the information listed in points [(a), (c), (e) and (f)] of paragraph 3 no later than three months before the start date of making in that Member State and in advance of any related act prior to that making that would otherwise be prohibited by the protection conferred by a certificate;
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new) (bb) the notification to the certificate holder shall not contain any confidential or commercially sensitive information.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the maker ensures that
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) the maker ensures that the medicinal product manufactured under paragraph 2(a) does not bear an active Unique Identifier as per Articles 3(d) and 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU. Where appropriate, competent authorities shall have access to the data in the repositories mandated by Directive 2011/62/EU and Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU to ensure that the maker complies with its obligations.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) the maker ensures that the medicinal product manufactured under paragraph 2(a) does not bear a Unique Identifier as per Articles 3(d) and 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU. Where appropriate, competent authorities shall have access to the data in the repositories mandated by Directive 2011/62/EU and Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU to ensure that the maker complies with its obligations.
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The information for the purposes of paragraph 2(b) shall be as follows, and must be treated in a strictly confidential manner:
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The information for the purposes of paragraph 2(b) shall be treated as strictly confidential by the holder of the certificate and be as follows:
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The information for the purposes of paragraph 2(b) shall be treated as strictly confidential by the holder of the certificate and be as follows:
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the address, or addresses, of the premises where the making
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the number of the
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the number of the
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point e Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) By providing for a period of supplementary protection of up to five years, Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 seeks to promote, within the Union, the research and innovation that is necessary to develop newer generation medicinal products that support the treatment of new disease entities or offer better therapeutic effects, and to contribute to preventing the relocation of pharmaceutical research outside the Union to countries that
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) the
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) a
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) a
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f)
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (fa) the name of any other countries where production is also taking place, and the address, or addresses, of the premises where the making is to take place or is taking place in the relevant country or countries;
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (fa) an undertaking not to put the product on the market in the Union or to otherwise infringe the certificate while it is inforce.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) By providing for a period of supplementary protection of up to five years, Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 seeks to promote, within the Union, the research and innovation that is necessary to develop medicinal products, and to contribute to preventing the relocation of pharmaceutical research outside the Union to countries that may offer greater protection, while at the same time ensuring access to medicines.
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. The maker shall ensure, through appropriate and documented means, that persons in a contractual relationship with the maker who perform acts falling within paragraph 2(a)(ii) are fully informed and aware of the following:
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. The maker shall ensure, through appropriate means, that persons in a contractual relationship with the maker who perform acts falling within paragraph 2(a)(ii) are
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply only in the case
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates applied for, granted on or after [OP: please insert the date of the first day of the third month that follows the month in which this amending Regulation is published in the Official Journal)].;
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. The notification sent to
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. ‘The notification sent to an authority as referred to in Article 4(2)(b) shall be published by that authority within 15 days of receipt of the notification, after the deletion of commercially sensitive information as defined, in particular, in Directive (EU) 2016/943 on business confidentiality and the guidelines of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Heads of Medicines Agencies network (HMA) on the identification of commercially sensitive information and personal data.’;
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. ‘The notification sent to an authority as referred to in Article 4(2)(b) shall be published by that authority within
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 21a – paragraph 4 Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The proposal to amend the regulation so as to allow the production of generics and biosimilars for export and storage to make it possible for them to enter the European market when the patent expires does not conflict with intellectual property rights, as they do not interfere with the duration of market exclusivity rights during the patent, which is underscored by the fact that immediate import is allowed after expiry, but represents a competitive disadvantage for the European generic medicines industry.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 21a – paragraph 4 Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Annex I Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Annex I Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The timely entry of generics and biosimilars onto the Union market is important for increasing competition, reducing prices and ensuring the sustainability of healthcare systems.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing,
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing,
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to markets outside the Union ("third countr
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to third country markets in which
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to
Amendment 34 #
(5) This puts manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union at a significant competitive disadvantage compared with manufacturers based in third countries that offer less or no protection. It may result in the re-export of generic and biosimilar medicinal products of unknown origin, often at dumping prices.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) This puts manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union at a significant competitive disadvantage compared with manufacturers based in third countries that offer less or no protection, which also leads to higher prices for medical products.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Without any intervention, the viability of the manufacture of generics and biosimilars in the Union could be under threat, with consequences for the
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products. I
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products. I
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products. I
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In th
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances,
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances,
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances,
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate, but not any other patent or intellectual property right existing in a Member State, so as to allow making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries and any related acts strictly necessary for making or for the actual export itself.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate, but not any patent or other intellectual property right existing in a Member State, so as to allow making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries and any related acts strictly necessary for making or for the actual export itself.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate so as to allow making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries and any related acts strictly necessary for making
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate so as to allow making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries, and in order for producers to produce a stock to ensure Day-1 entry, and any related acts strictly necessary for making or for the actual export itself.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the product which corresponds to the medicinal product protected by a supplementary protection certificate in the territory of a Member State, for the exclusive purposes of Day-1 Entry onto the Union market and of export to third countries, as well as any upstream or downstream acts by the maker or by third parties in a contractual relationship with the maker, where such acts would otherwise require the consent of the certificate-holder, and are strictly necessary for making for the purpose of export or for the actual export itself. For instance, such acts may include the supply and import of active ingredients for the purpose of making the medicinal product to which the product covered by the certificate corresponds, or temporary storage of the product or advertising for the exclusive purpose of export to third country destinations.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the product which corresponds to the medicinal product protected by a supplementary protection certificate in the territory of a Member State, for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries or day-1 entry, as well as any upstream or downstream acts by the maker or by third parties in a contractual relationship with the maker, where such acts would otherwise require the consent of the certificate-holder, and are strictly necessary for making for the purpose of export
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing the product made for the exclusive
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing the product made for the exclusive purpose of export on the market in the Member State where a supplementary protection certificate is in force, either directly or indirectly after export, nor should it cover re-importation of the product to the market of a Member State in which a certificate is in force. Moreover, it should not cover any act or activity for the purpose of import of medicinal products, or parts of medicinal products, into the Union merely for the purposes of repackaging and re-exporting, i.e. their re-export from third countries to the Union.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing the product made for the exclusive purposes of export or day-1 entry on the market in the Member State where a supplementary protection certificate is in force, either directly or indirectly after export, nor should it cover re-importation of the product to the market of a Member State in which a certificate is in force. Moreover, it should not cover any act or activity for the purpose of import of medicinal products, or parts of medicinal products, into the Union merely for the purposes of repackaging and re-exporting.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of ensuring Day-1 entry onto the Union market after expiry of supplementary protection certificates and for the export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not unreasonably conflict with normal exploitation of the product in the Member State where the certificate is in force, nor unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the certificate-holder, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of export outside the Union or day-1 entry and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not unreasonably conflict with normal exploitation of the product in the Member State where the certificate is in force, nor unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the certificate-holder, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of Day-1 Entry and of export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of Day-1 entry and of export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of Day-1 Entry and of export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 81 #
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Safeguards should accompany the exception in order to increase transparency, to help the holder of a supplementary protection certificate to enforce its protection in the Union and to reduce the risk of illicit diversion onto the Union market during the term of the certificate. At the same time the safeguards should also ensure the necessary confidentiality and protection of commercially sensitive information of the applicant.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Safeguards should accompany the exception in order to increase transparency, to help the holder of a supplementary protection certificate to enforce its protection in the Union and to reduce the risk of illicit diversion onto the Union market during the term of the certificate for the purpose of obtaining a profit not justified by the market.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Safeguards should accompany the exception in order to increase full transparency, to help the holder of a supplementary protection certificate to enforce its protection in the Union and to reduce the risk of illicit diversion onto the Union market during the term of the certificate.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Safeguards should accompany the
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The European Union has already a very strong IP enforcement system, notably through Directive 2004/48 of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights and its national implementations. In this respect, National Courts already strongly protect IP holders from infringements of their IP.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end,
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a once-off duty on the person making the product for the exclusive purposes of ensuring Day-1 entry onto the Union market after expiry of supplementary protection certificates, and of export, requiring that person to provide certain information to the authority which granted the supplementary protection certificate in the Member State where the making is to take place. The information should be provided before the making is intended to start for the first time in that Member State. The making and related acts, including those performed in Member States other than the one of making in cases where the product is protected by a certificate in those other Member States too, should only fall within the scope of the exception where the maker has sent this notification to the competent industrial property authority (or other designated authority) of the Member State of making. The once-off duty to provide information to the authority should apply in each Member State where making is to take place, both as regards the making in that Member State, and as regards related acts, whether performed in that or another Member State, related to that making. The authority should be required to publish that information, in the interests of full transparency and for the purpose of informing the holder of the certificate of the maker’s intention.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a once-off duty on the person making the product for the exclusive purpose of export, requiring that person to provide certain information to the authority which granted the supplementary protection certificate in the Member State where the making is to take place and the holder of the certificate. The information should be provided in a uniform format before the making is intended to start for the first time in that Member State. The making and related acts, including those performed in Member States other than the one of making in cases where the product is protected by a certificate in those other Member States too, should only fall within the scope of the exception where the maker has sent this notification to the competent industrial property authority (or other designated authority) of the Member State of making. The once-off duty to provide information
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end,
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, t
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The notification should be without prejudice to any defences otherwise available to the maker and any other persons conducting the related acts referred to in Recital 9 against a claim from the holder of the certificate in relation to an alleged infringement or threat of infringement of the certificate, and should not be construed as an acknowledgment by the maker that the certificate or the basic patent is valid and/or that the making or any of the related acts referred to in Recital 9 would otherwise infringe the certificate and/or the basic patent.
source: 629.448
2018/11/12
INTA
103 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) the certificate holder is informed, in writing, by the maker, of the information listed in points [(a), (c), (e) and (f)] of paragraph 3 no later than three months before the start date of making in that Member State and in advance of any related act prior to that making that would otherwise be prohibited by the protection conferred by a certificate;
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) the holder of the certificate is informed, by way of documented means, by the maker of the information listed in points (a), (c) and (e) of paragraph 3 no later than three months before the start date of the making or any acts related to that making in that Member State;
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new) (b b) the notification to the certificate holder shall not contain any confidential or commercially sensitive information.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) the maker ensures that the medicinal product manufactured under paragraph 2(a) does not bear an active Unique Identifier as per Articles 3(d) and 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU. Where appropriate, competent authorities shall have access to the data in the repositories mandated by Directive 2011/62/EU and Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU to ensure that the maker complies with its obligations.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The information for the purposes of paragraph 2(b) shall be treated as strictly confidential and be as follows:
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) the
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) a
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f)
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates applied for, granted on or after [OP: please insert the date of the first day of the third month that follows the month in
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11– paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) The proposal to amend the regulation so as to allow the production of generics and biosimilars for export and storage to make it possible for them to enter the European market when the patent expires does not conflict with intellectual property rights, as they do not interfere with the duration of market exclusivity rights during the patent, which is underscored by the fact that immediate import is allowed after expiry, but represents a competitive disadvantage for the European generic medicines industry.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) The established and elaborate system of protection of intellectual property rights in the Union should not be impinged upon and needs to be strengthened as it is the cornerstone of innovation, competitiveness and growth in the Member States.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Since the adoption in 1992 of the predecessor to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009, markets have evolved significantly and there has been huge
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3 a) Whereas the Council has noted with concern that “an increasing number of examples of market failure in a number of Member States, where patients access to effective and affordable essential medicines is endangered by very high and unsustainable price levels […] and that individual governments have sometimes limited influence in such circumstances;”1a __________________ 1a Council conclusions on strengthening the balance in the pharmaceutical systems in the EU and its Member States: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press /press-releases/2016/06/17/epsco- conclusions-balance-pharmaceutical- system/
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 b (new) (3 b) Whereas the European Parliament has expressed that “in many cases, the prices of new medicines have increased during the past few decades to the point of being unaffordable to many European citizens and of threatening the sustainability of national health care systems;”1a __________________ 1a Report on EU options for improving access to medicines (2016/2057(INI): http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getD oc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A8- 2017-0040&language=EN
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing,
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing in the Union, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to markets outside the Union ('third countr
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing within the Union, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to third country markets in which such protection does not exist or has expired. A further unintended consequence is that the protection conferred by the certificate makes it more difficult for those manufacturers to enter the Union market immediately after expiry of the certificate, given that they are not in a position to build up production capacity until the protection provided by the certificate has lapsed, by contrast with manufacturers located in third countries where protection does not exist or has expired.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products. I
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products. I
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate, but no patent or other intellectual property rights, so as to allow making for the exclusive purpose of export to countries outside the Union ('third countries') and any related acts strictly necessary for making or for the actual export itself.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate, but not any other patent or intellectual property right existing in a Member State, so as to allow making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries and any related acts strictly necessary for making or for the actual export itself.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate so as to allow ma
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the product which corresponds to the medicinal product protected by a supplementary protection certificate in the territory of a Member State, for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries and to prepare for Day-1 entry in the Union's market, as well as any upstream or downstream acts by the maker or by third parties in a contractual relationship with the maker, where such acts would otherwise require the consent of the certificate-holder, and are strictly necessary for making for the purpose of export
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the product which corresponds to the medicinal product protected by a supplementary protection certificate in the territory of a Member State, for the exclusive purpose of export to countries outside the Union ('third countries'), as well as any upstream or downstream acts by the maker or by third parties in a contractual relationship with the maker, where such acts would otherwise require the consent of the certificate-holder, and are strictly necessary for making for the purpose of export or for the actual export itself. For instance, such acts may include the supply and import of active ingredients for the purpose of making the medicinal product to which the product covered by the certificate corresponds, or temporary storage of the product or advertising for the exclusive purpose of export to
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the product which corresponds to the medicinal product protected by a
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of day-1 entry and of export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for Day-1 entry in the Union's market and for the purpose of export outside the Union, and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not unreasonably conflict with normal exploitation of the product in the Member State where the certificate is in force, nor unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the certificate-holder, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a once-off duty on the person making the product for the exclusive purpose of export, requiring that person to provide certain information to the authority which granted the supplementary protection certificate in the Member State where the making is to take place. The information should be provided before the making is intended to start for the first time in that Member State. The making and related acts, including those performed in Member States other than the one of making in cases where the product is protected by a certificate in those other Member States too, should only fall within the scope of the exception where the maker has sent this notification to the competent industrial property authority (or other designated authority) of the Member State of making. The once-off duty to provide information to the authority should apply in each Member State where making is to take place, both as regards the making in that Member State, and as regards related acts, whether performed in that or another Member State, related to that making. The authority should
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, t
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13 a) The maker should also inform the certificate holder, in writing, of the intention to make a product pursuant to the exception. A notification form should be provided for this purpose, which will differ from the one used to notify the authority in that it will not contain confidential or commercially sensitive information. This information should be updated when appropriate.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13 a) The maker should be required to inform the competent authority as well as the certificate holder of any changes to the information provided in the notifications.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on the maker as a condition for the exception to operate. The maker should be required to inform persons within its supply chain, through appropriate means, in particular contractual means, that the product is covered by the exception introduced by this Regulation and is intended for the exclusive purpose of export, or Day-1 entry. A maker who failed to comply with these due diligence requirements would not benefit from the exception, nor would any third party performing a related act in the same or a different Member State where a certificate conferring protection for the product was in force, and the holder of the relevant certificate would therefore be entitled to enforce its rights under the certificate.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on the maker as a condition for the exception to operate. The maker should be required to inform persons within its supply chain, through appropriate and documented means, in particular contractual means, that the product is covered by the exception introduced by this Regulation and is intended for the exclusive purpose of export. A maker who failed to comply with these due diligence requirements would not benefit from the exception, nor would any
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14 a) The warning letter to the SPC Holder should not include commercially sensitive information and/or confidential details of a company business plan, to limit any anti-competitive effects. To that end, the information required in the warning letter should notably comply with existing EU legislation and recommendations, such as Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June2016 on trade secrets and the EMA/HMA Guidance Document on the identification of commercially confidential information and personal data. For the same reasons, the warning letter and the information it contains should be treated as strictly confidential by the holder of the certificate and should not be used by the holder of the certificate for any other purpose than ensuring that the maker has complied with the scope and conditions of the exception.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Furthermore, this Regulation should impose labelling requirements on the maker, in order to facilitate, by means of a logo, identification of the product as a product exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries. The making and related acts should only fall outside the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate if the product is labelled in this manner. This labelling obligation would be without prejudice to labelling requirements of third countries. Furthermore, a medicinal product bearing a Unique Identifier as per Articles 3(d) and 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU would indicate that the product is not exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries. Therefore, this regulation should prohibit a product exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries from bearing such Unique Identifier.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new) (15 a) The notification to the authority which granted the supplementary protection certificate and the information it contains should be kept confidential. Specific measures should be taken to protect such confidentiality. The authority may only disclose the information if disclosure is ordered by a court under specific circumstances.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) This Regulation does not affect the application of Union measures that aim to prevent infringements and facilitate enforcement of intellectual property rights, including Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council41
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) This Regulation does not affect the application of Union measures that aim to prevent infringements and facilitate enforcement of intellectual property rights, including Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council41
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19)
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the exception provided for in this Regulation should only apply to certificates
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the exception provided for in this Regulation should only apply to certificates that are applied for, granted on or after a specified date after entry into force, irrespective of when the application for the certificate was first lodged. The date specified should allow a reasonable time for applicants and other relevant market players to adjust to the changed legal context and to make appropriate investment and manufacturing location decisions in a timely way. The date should also allow sufficient time for public authorities to put in place appropriate arrangements to receive and publish notifications of the intention to make, and should take due account of pending applications for certificates.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the exception provided for in this Regulation should only apply to certificates that are
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the exception provided for in this Regulation should only apply to
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective, of providing a level playing field for generic and biosimilar manufacturers with their competitors in third country markets where protection does not exist or has expired, to lay down rules
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective, of providing a level playing field for generic and biosimilar manufacturers with their competitors in third country markets where protection does not exist or has expired, to lay down rules restricting the exclusive right of a supplementary protection certificate holder to make the product in question during the term of the certificate
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective, of providing a level playing field for generic and biosimilar manufacturers with their competitors in third country markets where
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate,
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate, by confining the exception to certificates
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate, by confining the exception to certificates
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate, by confining the exception to certificates applied for, granted on or after a specified date after entry into force of this Regulation and by imposing certain conditions on the application of the exception,
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for either: a. the exclusive purpose of export to third countries; or b. the exclusive purpose of selling or offering to sell in the Union market immediately after expiry of the certificate;
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries where no protection for the medicinal product exists or has expired; or
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to countries outside the Union ('third countries'); or
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i a (new) (i a) making for the purpose of entering the Union's market on Day-1 entry after the expiry of the supplementary protection certificate;
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making, including keeping, or for the actual export itself;
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making, storing or for the actual export itself;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii (new) (ii a) (iii) sale, and offer for sale, for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries; or
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iv (new) (ii b) (iv) importing for the purposes of (i)
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) the certificate holder is informed, in writing, by the maker, that a notification has been sent pursuant to paragraph 2(b) and is provided with the information listed in of paragraph 3 (c) and (f) of this article no later than 90 days before the start date of making in that Member State and in advance of any related act prior to that making that would otherwise be prohibited by the protection conferred by a certificate; the SPC holder should keep the warning letter and the information it contains strictly confidential and should not use them for any other purpose than ensuring that the maker has complied with the scope and conditions of the exception.
source: 630.399
2018/11/28
JURI
239 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a once-off duty on the person making the product for the exclusive purpose of export, requiring that person to provide certain information to the authority which granted the supplementary protection certificate in the Member State where the making is to take place. The information should be provided before the
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a once-off duty on the person making the product for the exclusive purpose of export, requiring that person to provide certain information to the authority which granted the supplementary protection certificate in the Member State where the making is to take place. The information should be provided before the making is intended to start for the first time in that Member State. The making and related acts, including those performed in
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, and to the extent it intends to rely on the exception, this Regulation should impose a once-off duty on the person
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) To this end, this Regulation should impose a
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The maker should also inform the certificate holder, in writing, of the intention to make a product pursuant to the exception. A notification form should be provided for this purpose, which will differ from the one used to notify the authority in that it will not contain confidential or commercially sensitive information. This information should be updated when appropriate.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The maker should also inform the holder of the certificate, in writing, that a notification has been sent to the authority in relation the certificate
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The information contained in the notification to the competent authority should be kept confidential and may only be disclosed upon court order.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 b (new) (13b) The maker should be required to inform the competent authority as well as the certificate holder of any changes to the respectively provided information.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on the maker as a condition for the exception to operate. The maker should be required to inform persons within its supply chain, through appropriate means, in particular contractual means, that the product is covered by the exception introduced by this Regulation and is intended for the exclusive purpose of export. A maker who failed to comply with these due diligence requirements would not benefit from the exception
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on the maker as a condition for the exception to operate. The maker should be required to inform persons within its supply chain, through appropriate means, in particular contractual means, that the product is covered by the exception introduced by this Regulation and is intended for the exclusive purpose of export, and/or that it is being manufactured exclusively to be marketed only after the expiry of the certificate. A maker who failed to comply with these due diligence requirements would not benefit from the exception, nor would any third party performing a related act in the same or a different Member State where a certificate conferring protection for the product was in force, and the holder of the relevant certificate would therefore be entitled to enforce its rights under the certificate.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on the maker as a condition for the exception to operate. The maker should be required to inform persons within its supply chain, through appropriate means, in particular contractual means, that the product is covered by the exception introduced by this Regulation and is intended for the exclusive purpose of export and/or Day-1 entry. A maker who failed to comply with these due diligence requirements would not benefit from the exception, nor would any third party performing a related act in the same or a different Member State where a certificate conferring protection for the product was in force, and the holder of the relevant certificate would therefore be entitled to enforce its rights under the certificate.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In addition, this Regulation should impose certain due diligence requirements on
Amendment 120 #
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Furthermore, this Regulation should impose labelling requirements on the maker, in order to facilitate, by means of a logo, identification of the product as a product exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries. The making and related acts should only fall outside the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate if the product is labelled in this manner. This labelling obligation would be without prejudice to labelling requirements of third countries. Furthermore, a medicinal product bearing a Unique Identifier as per Articles 3(d) and 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU would indicate that the product is not exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries. Therefore, this regulation should prohibit a product exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries from bearing such Unique Identifier.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Furthermore, this Regulation should impose labelling requirements on the maker, in order to facilitate, by means of a logo, identification of the product as a product exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries. Conversely, a medicinal product bearing a Unique Identifier as per Articles 3(d) and 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU would indicate that the product is not exclusively intended for the purpose of export to third countries. The
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Furthermore, this Regulation should impose labelling requirements on the maker, in order to facilitate, by means of a logo, identification of the product as a product exclusively intended for the purposes of Day-1 entry onto the Union market after the expiry of the supplementary protection certificate or of export to third countries. The making
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) This Regulation does not affect the application of Union measures that aim to prevent infringements and facilitate enforcement of intellectual property rights, including Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council41 and Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council42. Furthermore, this Regulation does not affect the rules on the unique identifier provided for in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1611a. . _________________ 41 Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ L157, 30.4.2004, p. 45). 42 Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ L 181, 29.6.2013, p. 15). 1a Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 of 2 October 2015 supplementing Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council by laying down detailed rules for the safety features appearing on the packaging of medicinal products for human use (OJ L 32, 9.2.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) This Regulation does not affect the application of Union measures that aim to prevent infringements and facilitate enforcement of intellectual property rights, including Directive 2004/48/EC
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 a (new) (17a) However, in order to avoid abuse and illicit distribution of medicinal products manufactured according to this Regulation onto the Union market, even though it was manufactured with the sole purpose of being exported to third countries, thus to help preventing the so called ‘launch-at-risk’, unique identifiers provided for in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 should not be affixed to the medicinal product.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19)
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19)
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that the rights of holders of supplementary protection certificates a
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the exception provided for in this Regulation should
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the exception provided for in this Regulation should only apply to certificates that are
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19)
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates already in force are not deprived of their acquired rights, the exception provided for in this Regulation should only apply to certificates that are
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure the uniform implementation of this Regulation in the Member States and in order to ensure that holders of supplementary protection certificates a
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) (19a) This Regulation should not have any retroactive effect.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The Commission should carry out a
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Regulation. The merits of the present regulation deserve a thorough debate; the impact of the patent system, and of the SPC protection in particular, on generic competition, on healthcare budgets and on the access to medicines in Europe should be carefully assessed through a continuous evaluation of the SPC system. Given the paramount importance of access to and affordability of medicinal products for public health and public expenditure, a frequent evaluation cycle is justified. Pursuant to paragraph 22 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201643, that evaluation should be based on the five criteria of effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and added value and should provide the basis for impact assessments of possible further measures. The evaluation should take into account
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Regulation. Pursuant to paragraph 22 of the Interinstitutional
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective, of providing a level playing field for generic and biosimilar manufacturers with their
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective, of providing a level playing field for generic and biosimilar manufacturers with their competitors in third country markets where protection does not exist or has expired, to lay down rules restricting the exclusive right of a supplementary protection certificate holder to make the product in question during the term of the certificate
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It is necessary and appropriate for the achievement of the basic objective, of providing a level playing field for generic and biosimilar manufacturers with their competitors in
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Th
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate,
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate, by confining the exception to certificates
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate,
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate,
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate and the right to healthcare in Article 35 of the Charter, by enhancing access to medicines for all patients, by confining the exception to certificates granted on or after a specified date after entry into force of this Regulation and by imposing certain conditions on the application of the exception,
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate, by confining the exception to certificates applied for, granted on or after a specified date after entry into force of this Regulation and by
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate, by confining the exception to certificates
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate, by
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the right to property in Article 17 of the Charter by maintaining the core rights of the supplementary protection certificate,
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part (1) Article
Amendment 156 #
Article
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall not confer protection against a
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall not confer protection against
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall not confer protection against
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall not confer protection against
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall not confer protection against
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The certificate referred to in paragraph 1 shall not confer protection against
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the act comprises
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the acts comprises:
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the acts comprises:
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the act
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 (i) making for either: a. making a product, or a product to be placed on the market as a medicinal product, for the exclusive purposes of export to third countries and/or storage to enter the market of Member States as and from day-1; or
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries or to countries where no supplementary protection certificate is in place; or placing on the market after the expiry of the certificate; or
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making of a medicinal product for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries; and / or entry onto the market of Member States immediately after expiry of the certificate in those Member States, and/or
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries; and/or entry onto the market of Member States immediately after expiry of the certificate in those Member States; and/or
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries; and/or entry onto the market of Member States immediately after expiry of the certificate in those Member States; and/or
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose(s) of export to third countries; and/or entry onto the market of Member States after expiry of the certificate in those Member States; and/or
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) an act of making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries where protection for the product or medicinal product does not exist or has expired; or
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries where no protection for the medicinal product exists or has expired; or
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the exclusive purpose of export to
Amendment 179 #
(i) making a product, or a medicinal product containing that product for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries; or
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) making for the
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i a (new) (ia) making for the purpose of entering the Union's market on Day-1 after the expiry of the supplementary protection certificate; or
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i a (new) (ia) making for the purpose of entering markets in the Union on Day-1 after the expiry of the supplementary protection certificate; or
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making or for the
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making or for the
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making or for the actual export itself
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making in the Union or for the actual export and/or storage itself;
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point ii (ii) any related act
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) any related act that is strictly necessary for that making, storing or for the actual export itself;
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) and excludes any act or activity for the purpose of import of medicinal products, or parts thereof, onto the Union merely for the purpose of repackaging and re-exporting.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) not an act or activity for the purpose of import of medicinal products, or parts thereof, into the Union merely for the purposes of repackaging and re- exporting.
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) sale, and offer for sale, for the purpose of export to third countries; or
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) importing for the purposes of (i);
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) before making use of the information referred to in paragraph 2, the maker has made an effort to enter into voluntary licensing agreements with the certificate holder on reasonable terms and conditions; if these efforts are not successful within eight weeks, the maker may make use of this information.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than 28 days before the intended start date of making in that Member State; in order to preserve the competitiveness of this sector, commercially sensitive information shall not be disclosed to any competitor (generics and/or the originator).
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in points(a) and (c) of paragraph 3 no later than 28 days before the
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) referred to in point (a) (i) of paragraph 2 of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the authority referred to in Article 9(1) of the Member State where that making is to take place (‘the relevant Member State’) is notified by the person doing the making (‘the maker’) of the information listed in paragraph 3 no later than
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) the information provided by the maker to the certificate holder is treated as strictly confidential by the certificate holder and is not published; in addition, the information from the certificate holder is used exclusively for the purposes of verifying whether the requirements of the Regulation have been met and, where applicable, initiating legal proceedings for non-compliance;
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) the certificate holder is informed, in writing, by the maker, of the information listed in points [(a), (c), (e) and (f)] of paragraph 3 no later than three months before the start date of making in that Member State and in advance of any related act prior to that making that would otherwise be prohibited by the protection conferred by a certificate;
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) The holder of the certificate is also informed, in writing, by the maker, or any person acting on its behalf ("the letter"), that a notification has been sent pursuant to paragraph 2(b) for a certificate prior to the intended start date of making.
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) the maker informs the certificate holder of the information listed in paragraph 3, points (a), (c) and (e) of this Article, including any changes thereof, no later than 90 days before the start date of the making;
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new) (bb) the notification to the certificate holder shall not contain any confidential or commercially sensitive information.
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) (i) the maker ensures that a logo, in the form set out in Annex -I, is affixed to the
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) in the case of products made for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries, the maker ensures that a logo, in the form set out in Annex -I, is affixed to the outer packaging of the product or, if there is no outer packaging, to its immediate packaging;
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the maker ensures that a logo, in the form set out in Annex -II, is affixed to the outer packaging of the product or
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) the maker ensures that the medicinal product manufactured according to paragraph 2(a) does not bear an active unique identifier laid down in Art. 3(d) and 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161. Where appropriate, the competent authority shall have access to the data in the repositories mandated by Directive 2011/62/EU and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 in order to verify compliance;
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) the maker ensures that medicinal products intended for export to third countries do not bear a unique identifier as set out in point (d) of Article 3 and Article 4 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1611a; _________________ 1a Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 of 2 October 2015 supplementing Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council by laying down detailed rules for the safety features appearing on the packaging of medicinal products for human use (OJ L 32, 9.2.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) the maker ensures that the product manufactured under paragraph 2(a) does not bear a unique identifier as per Articles 3(d) and 4 of Delegated Regulation 2016/161/EU.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory wording 3. The information for the purposes of paragraph 2(b), which must be treated in a strictly confidential manner by all parties, shall be as follows:
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory wording 3. The information for the purposes of paragraph 2(b) shall be treated as strictly confidential and be as follows
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the address, or addresses, of the premises where the making
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the address, or addresses, of the premises where the making
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph c (c) the number of the
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph d Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point e Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) the
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) a
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) a
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f)
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f)
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (fa) an undertaking not to put the product on the market in the Union or to otherwise infringe the certificate while it is inforce.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The authorities of the Member States referred to in Art. 9(1) shall under no circumstances disclose any business sensitive information provided by the maker of the medicinal product, neither to the certificate holder nor to the public;
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. The maker shall ensure, through appropriate and documented means, that persons in a contractual relationship with the maker who perform acts falling within paragraph 2(a)(ii) are fully informed and aware of the following:
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. The maker shall ensure, through appropriate and documented means, that persons in a contractual relationship with the maker who perform acts falling within paragraph 2(a)(ii) are fully informed and aware of the following:
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The maker will bear the burden of proof that the obligations set out under Article4(2) have been complied with.
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates granted
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 251 #
5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall not apply in the case
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall apply in the case only of certificates
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Paragraph 2 shall only apply in the case
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. The notification sent to an authority as referred to in Article
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. ‘The notification sent to an authority as referred to in Article 4(2)(b) shall be published by that authority within 15 days of receipt of the notification.’
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 4. The
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. 'The notification sent to an authority as referred to in Article 4(2)(b) shall be published by that authority within
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The letter to the holder of the certificate as referred to in Article 2(b new) shall be treated as strictly confidential and shall not be used by the holder of the certificate for any other purpose than ensuring compliance of the maker with the conditions set out for the exception
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 Article 21 Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) By providing for a period of supplementary protection of up to five years, Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 seeks to promote, within the Union, the research and innovation that is necessary to develop medicinal products, and to contribute to preventing the relocation of pharmaceutical research outside the Union to countries that may offer greater protection, while at the same time ensuring access to medicines within the Union.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) By providing for a period of supplementary protection of up to five years, Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 seeks to promote, within the Union, the research and innovation that is necessary to develop medicinal products, and to contribute to preventing the relocation of pharmaceutical research outside the Union to countries that may offer greater protection, while at the same time ensuring access to medicines.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Since the adoption in 1992 of the predecessor to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009, markets have evolved significantly and there has been huge growth in the manufacture of generics and especially of biosimilars, in particular in countries outside the EU (‘third countries’) where protection does not exist or has expired. Assuming a sustained growth in global demand for medical products, by 2020 generics and biosimilars will represent 80 % of all medicines by volume, and about 28 % by value.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Since the adoption in 1992 of the predecessor to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009, markets have evolved significantly and there has been huge growth in the manufacture of generics and especially of biosimilars and active ingredients, in particular in third countries, outside the European Union, where protection does not exist or has expired.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Since the adoption in 1992 of the predecessor to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009, markets have evolved significantly and there has been huge growth in the manufacture of generics and especially of biosimilars, in particular in
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The Council, in its conclusions on strengthening the balance in the pharmaceutical systems in the Union and its Member States1a, and the European Parliament in its Resolution 2016/2057(INI) on Access to medicines, have underlined the importance of timely availability of generics and biosimilars in order to increase competition, to reduce prices, to facilitate patients' access to pharmaceutical therapies and to improve the sustainability of national health systems; _________________ 1a Council conclusions adopted in June 2016: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press /press-releases/2016/06/17/epsco- conclusions-balance-pharmaceutical- system.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The timely entry of generics and biosimilars onto the Union market is important for increasing competition, reducing prices and ensuring the sustainability of healthcare systems.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The timely entry of generics and biosimilars onto the Union market is important for increasing competition, reducing prices and ensuring the sustainability of healthcare systems.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 b (new) (3b) Supplementary Protection Certificates in the EU grant prolonged market exclusivity status upon the expiry of the patent term, the extension of exclusive rights beyond the patent terms, including Supplementary Protection Certificates, go beyond the mandatory requirements of the TRIPS agreement (‘TRIPS Plus’);
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 c (new) (3c) None of the studies commissioned by the European Commission and by Member States on the SPC system in 2018 found evidence that without SPCs, pharmaceutical companies lacked adequate protection to recoup Research and Development investments. Whereas the lack of such data calls for a more thorough evaluation and debate about the relevance of the SPC system, beyond the scope of the SPC manufacturing waiver subject of the present Regulation;
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing,
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing,
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing, even for the
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union from manufacturing, even for the exclusive purpose of exporting to third country markets in which
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) This puts manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union at a significant competitive disadvantage compared with manufacturers based in third countries that offer less or no protection
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) This puts manufacturers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union at a significant competitive disadvantage compared with manufacturers based in third countries that offer less or no protection, which also leads to higher prices for medical products.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Without any intervention, the viability of the manufacture of generics and biosimilars in the Union could be under threat, with consequences for the Union’s pharmaceutical industrial base as a whole, which may affect the very functioning of the internal market through the loss of potential new business opportunities as well as diminishing investment at EU level, possibly hampering the creation of new jobs.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired, as well as on the internal market from the day that the supplementary protection has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products. Indirectly, it is also intended to put those manufacturers in a better position to enter the Union market immediately after expiry of the relevant supplementary protection certificate. It would also help to serve the aim of fostering access to medicines in the Union by helping to ensure a swifter entry of generic and biosimilar medicines onto the market after expiry of the relevant certificate.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products. I
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products. I
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement the efforts of the Union’s trade policy to ensure open markets for Union-based manufacturers of medicinal products. I
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where supplementary protection does not exist or has expired. It is intended to complement
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The aim of this Regulation is to ensure that manufacturers established in the Union are able to compete effectively in those third country markets where
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In th
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances,
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In th
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate so as to allow making for the exclusive purpose of export
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate so as to allow making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries , entering markets in the Union immediately upon expiry of the supplementary protection certificate and any related acts
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific and limited circumstances, and in order to create a level playing field between Union-based manufacturers and third country manufacturers, it is appropriate to restrict the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate, but not any patent or other intellectual property right existing in a Member State, so as to allow making for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries and any related acts strictly necessary for making or for the actual export itself.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In those specific
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the product which corresponds to the medicinal product protected by a supplementary protection certificate in the territory of a Member State, for the exclusive purpose of export to third
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the product which corresponds to the medicinal product protected by a supplementary protection certificate in the territory of a Member State, for the exclusive purpose of export
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the product which corresponds to the medicinal product protected by a supplementary protection certificate in the territory of a Member State, for the exclusive purpose of export to
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product, including the product which corresponds to the medicinal product protected by a supplementary protection certificate in the territory of a Member State, for the exclusive purpose of export to third countries, as well as any upstream or downstream acts by the maker or by third parties in a contractual relationship with the maker, where such acts would otherwise require the consent of the certificate-holder, and are
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) That exception should cover the making of the product
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing the medicinal product made for the exclusive purpose of export and Day 1 entry on the market in
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The exception should not cover placing
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purpose of export outside the Union
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purpose of export
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for Day-1 entry in the Union's market and for the purpose of export outside the Union, and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not unreasonably conflict with normal exploitation of the product in the Member State where the certificate is in force, nor unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the certificate-holder, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of Day-1 entry and of export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of Day-1 Entry and of export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purposes of day-1 entry and export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself, the exception introduced by this Regulation will not
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) By
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 98 #
(12)
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 source: 630.706
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-629542_EN.html
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-627040_EN.html
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-630706_EN.html
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-628707_EN.html
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32111&j=0&l=en
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2019-02-26T00:00:00New
2019-02-25T00:00:00 |
events/8/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3800)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.542
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.040&secondRef=02
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.706
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.707&secondRef=02
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/11 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0039&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0039_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0401New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0401_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/11/summary |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
JURI/8/13264New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/0/date |
2018-06-26T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2018-06-20T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
JURI/8/13264
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52018PC0317:EN
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|