Progress: Awaiting final decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | MARTUSCIELLO Fulvio ( PPE) | KOFOD Jeppe ( S&D), ZĪLE Roberts ( ECR), CORNILLET Thierry ( ALDE), SCOTT CATO Molly ( Verts/ALE), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 1, 1, 3
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 1, 1, 3Events
The European Parliament adopted by 493 votes to 48, with 137 abstentions, following a special legislative procedure (consultation), a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the introduction of the detailed technical measures for the operation of the definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States.
The European Parliament approved the Commission's proposal subject to the following amendments:
Definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States
Parliament stressed the urgent and far-reaching need to reform the VAT system in order to achieve a definitive VAT system that facilitates and simplifies intra-EU cross-border trade and to make the system more fraud-proof. The creation of a single Union VAT area is crucial in order to decrease compliance costs for businesses, particularly SMEs working cross-border, to reduce the risks of cross-border VAT fraud and to simplify VAT-related procedures.
The current initiative is based on the Member States’ preferred approach of taxation at destination, with a view to allowing Member States a certain flexibility in the setting of VAT rates.
Those new principles will enable the Member States to better fight VAT fraud, especially Missing Trader Intra-Community (MTIC), estimated to amount to at least EUR 50 billion a year.
Certified taxable persons
Members proposed strict criteria, applied in a harmonised way by all Member States, need to be put in place to determine which enterprises can benefit from the status of the certified taxable person, and common rules and provisions resulting in fines and penalties for those who do not comply with them should be established.
These criteria shall include the absence of any serious criminal offence related to the applicant's economic activity, such as, in particular: (i) money laundering; (ii) tax evasion and tax fraud; (iii) misuse of EU funds and programmes; (iv) bankruptcy or insolvency fraud; (v) bribery and/or corruption; (vi) cybercrime; (vii) participation in a criminal organisation or terrorist activities.
In order to ensure a harmonised interpretation in the granting of the certified taxable person status, the Commission shall adopt by means of an implementing act further guidance for Member States regarding the evaluation of those criteria, which shall be valid across the Union.
In addition, in order to encourage applications for the certified taxable person status, the Commission shall introduce a tailored procedure for Small and Medium Enterprises.
Where the status of certified taxable person is granted, that information shall be made available via the VAT Information Exchange System. Where the application is refused, the decision as well as the grounds for refusal shall be notified to tax authorities of other Member States.
Tax authorities of Member States having granted the status of certified taxable person shall review that decision, at least every two years, to ensure that the conditions are still met. If the taxable person has not informed the tax authorities of any factor possibly affecting the certified taxable person status as laid out in the implementing act or has purposefully concealed it, it shall be subject to proportionate, efficient and dissuasive sanctions, including the loss of the certified taxable person status.
Information portal
By 1 June 2020, the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall establish a comprehensive, multilingual and publicly accessible Union VAT Web Information Portal on which businesses and consumers can quickly and effectively obtain accurate information on VAT rates – including which goods or services benefit from reduced rates or exemptions – and all relevant information on the implementation of the definitive VAT system in the different Member States.
In complement to the Portal, an automated notification mechanism shall be set up. That mechanism shall ensure automatic notifications to tax payers on changes and updates to the VAT rates of Member States. Such automatic notifications shall be activated before the change becomes applicable and at the latest five days after the decision has been taken.
Members stressed that Member States' tax administrations must cooperate closely in a spirit of mutual trust and exchange relevant information in order to carry out their tasks.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, following a special legislative procedure (consultation of Parliament), the report by Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO (EPP, IT) on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the introduction of the detailed technical measures for the operation of the definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission's proposal subject to the following amendments:
Taxation in the country of destination
Members stressed that the creation of a single Union VAT area is crucial in order to decrease compliance costs for businesses, particularly SMEs working cross-border, to reduce the risks of cross-border VAT fraud and to simplify VAT-related procedures.
The principle of taxation at origin as envisaged for the definitive VAT system should be replaced by the principle of taxation in the Member State of destination. That change should contribute to the reduction of VAT-related cross-border frauds by an estimated EUR 50 billion annually.
Certified taxable persons
Members proposed strict criteria, applied in a harmonised way by all Member States, need to be put in place to determine which enterprises can benefit from the status of the certified taxable person, and common rules and provisions resulting in fines and penalties for those who do not comply with them should be established.
In order to ensure a harmonised interpretation in the granting of the certified taxable person status, the Commission shall adopt by means of an implementing act further guidance for Member States regarding the evaluation of those criteria, which shall be valid across the Union.
In addition, in order to encourage applications for the certified taxable person status, the Commission shall introduce a tailored procedure for Small and Medium Enterprises.
Where the status of certified taxable person is granted, that information shall be made available via the VAT Information Exchange System. Where the application is refused, the decision as well as the grounds for refusal shall be notified to tax authorities of other Member States.
Tax authorities of Member States having granted the status of certified taxable person shall review that decision, at least every two years, to ensure that the conditions are still met. If the taxable person has not informed the tax authorities of any factor possibly affecting the certified taxable person status as laid out in the implementing act or has purposefully concealed it, it shall be subject to proportionate, efficient and dissuasive sanctions, including the loss of the certified taxable person status.
Information portal
By 1 June 2020, the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall establish a comprehensive, multilingual and publicly accessible Union VAT Web Information Portal on which businesses and consumers can quickly and effectively obtain accurate information on VAT rates – including which goods or services benefit from reduced rates or exemptions – and all relevant information on the implementation of the definitive VAT system in the different Member States.
In complement to the Portal, an automated notification mechanism shall be set up. That mechanism shall ensure automatic notifications to tax payers on changes and updates to the VAT rates of Member States. Such automatic notifications shall be activated before the change becomes applicable and at the latest five days after the decision has been taken.
Members stressed that Member States' tax administrations must cooperate closely in a spirit of mutual trust and exchange relevant information in order to carry out their tasks.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to implement the definitive VAT system to improve the operation of VAT arrangements for cross-border B2B trade on goods within the Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: the creation of a simple, modern and fraud-proof VAT system is one of the fiscal priorities set out by the Commission. In its 2016 VAT action plan , the Commission announced its intention to propose a definitive VAT system for the EU.
This proposal is part of a package of measures aimed at radically changing VAT rules by ending 25 years of a 'transitional' VAT system in the single market. This arrangement, as far as Business-to-Business (B2B) transactions on goods are concerned, split the cross-border movement of goods into two different transactions: an exempt supply in the Member State of departure of the goods and an intra-Community acquisition taxed in the Member State of destination
The proposal presented by the Commission puts an end to this artificial split of a single commercial transaction.
Besides the change to the definitive VAT system for cross-border trade, this move includes two other proposals to modify Directive 2006/112/EC (VAT Directive): one as regards VAT rates and one as regards the special scheme for small enterprises . In addition, it includes a proposal for a Council Regulation on combating fraud in the field of VAT.
As regards the change towards a definitive VAT system based on the principle of taxation in the Member State of destination a gradual two-step approach was announced: a first step settling intra-Union B2B supplies of goods and a second step covering supplies of services.
The first step was further divided into two sub-steps. The first sub-step, presented simultaneously with the Communication, was a legislative proposal which outlined the cornerstones for a simpler and fraud-proof definitive VAT system for intra-Union trade.
The current proposal represents the second sub-step. It contains the detailed arrangements to put these cornerstones in place for intra-Union B2B supplies of goods.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: a back to back impact assessment and evaluation was carried out which covered both the setting of the cornerstones of the definitive VAT system and the detailed arrangements for putting these cornerstones into place. The preferred option would reduce cross-border VAT fraud by up to EUR 41 billion per annum and reduce compliance costs for businesses by EUR 938 million per annum.
The Regulatory Scrutiny Board gave a positive opinion to the impact assessment with some recommendations, in particular on the link of the proposal to other elements of the VAT Action Plan, the need for a staged approach and the concept of certified taxable person, that have been taken on board.
CONTENT: this proposal amends the VAT Directive as regards the introduction of detailed technical measures for the operation of the definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States. It is intended to replace the transitional arrangements applicable since 1 January 1993 by a definitive VAT system for intra-Union B2B trade under which domestic and cross-border transactions involving goods will be treated in the same way.
The main elements of the proposal are as follows:
Simplifying how goods are taxed : in the current VAT system, trade in goods between businesses is split into two transactions: a VAT-exempt sale in the Member State of origin and a taxed acquisition in the Member State of destination.
It is proposed that cross-border B2B supplies of goods within the Union should be combined into a single type of transaction for VAT purposes: an intra-Union supply of goods. A definition of the concept of intra-Union supply of goods is integrated.
Place of supply rules : the combination of the definition of intra-Union supplies of goods and the new proposed place of supply rule ensures the taxation of cross-border B2B supply of goods in the Union in the Member State of destination.
Chargeability of the tax : an amendment is proposed that determines a single rule for the chargeability of VAT on intra-Union supplies. According to this rule VAT shall become chargeable on issue of the invoice, or on expiry of the time limit if no invoice has been issued by that time (fifteenth day of the month following that in which the chargeable event occurs).
Person liable for payment of VAT : the principle remains that VAT shall be payable by any taxable person carrying out a taxable supply of goods or services, unless in other provisions, it is stipulated that VAT is payable by another person.
As an exception, a new Article is proposed according to which VAT shall be payable by the person to whom the goods are supplied insofar he is a certified taxable person if the goods are supplied by a taxable person not established within the territory of the Member State in which the VAT is due.
As regards intra-Union supplies of goods , the supplier shall, in principle, be liable for the payment of the VAT in the Member State of arrival of the goods except where the supplier is not established in the Member State of taxation and the customer is a certified taxable person. In the latter case, the customer will pay the VAT due by way of reverse charge in the Member State of arrival of the goods.
Identification : an amendment is proposed according to which Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that a non-taxable legal person who is the recipient of an intra-Union supply is identified by means of an individual number.
Reduced administrative formalities : the changes reboot the self-policing character of VAT and will reduce the amount of administrative steps that need to be taken by businesses when they sell to other companies in other Member States
Intra-Union supplies of goods should under the proposed system no longer be included in the recapitulative statements. The principle of VAT being charged by the supplier on the intraUnion supply re-installs the self-policing character of VAT. Consequently, ensuring an administrative follow-up to the physical flow of goods through the recapitulative statement within the Union is no longer justified.
Single online portal : in order to make the change to VAT rules as seamless as possible for businesses, the proposed amendments would introduce the necessary provisions to put in place an online portal or 'One Stop Shop' for all business-to-business (B2B) EU traders to sort out their VAT. This system will also be available to companies outside the EU who want to sell to other businesses within the Union and who would otherwise have to register for VAT in every Member State. Once in force, these businesses will simply have to appoint one intermediary in the EU to take care of VAT for them.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to implement the definitive VAT system to improve the operation of VAT arrangements for cross-border B2B trade on goods within the Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: the creation of a simple, modern and fraud-proof VAT system is one of the fiscal priorities set out by the Commission. In its 2016 VAT action plan , the Commission announced its intention to propose a definitive VAT system for the EU.
This proposal is part of a package of measures aimed at radically changing VAT rules by ending 25 years of a 'transitional' VAT system in the single market. This arrangement, as far as Business-to-Business (B2B) transactions on goods are concerned, split the cross-border movement of goods into two different transactions: an exempt supply in the Member State of departure of the goods and an intra-Community acquisition taxed in the Member State of destination
The proposal presented by the Commission puts an end to this artificial split of a single commercial transaction.
Besides the change to the definitive VAT system for cross-border trade, this move includes two other proposals to modify Directive 2006/112/EC (VAT Directive): one as regards VAT rates and one as regards the special scheme for small enterprises . In addition, it includes a proposal for a Council Regulation on combating fraud in the field of VAT.
As regards the change towards a definitive VAT system based on the principle of taxation in the Member State of destination a gradual two-step approach was announced: a first step settling intra-Union B2B supplies of goods and a second step covering supplies of services.
The first step was further divided into two sub-steps. The first sub-step, presented simultaneously with the Communication, was a legislative proposal which outlined the cornerstones for a simpler and fraud-proof definitive VAT system for intra-Union trade.
The current proposal represents the second sub-step. It contains the detailed arrangements to put these cornerstones in place for intra-Union B2B supplies of goods.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: a back to back impact assessment and evaluation was carried out which covered both the setting of the cornerstones of the definitive VAT system and the detailed arrangements for putting these cornerstones into place. The preferred option would reduce cross-border VAT fraud by up to EUR 41 billion per annum and reduce compliance costs for businesses by EUR 938 million per annum.
The Regulatory Scrutiny Board gave a positive opinion to the impact assessment with some recommendations, in particular on the link of the proposal to other elements of the VAT Action Plan, the need for a staged approach and the concept of certified taxable person, that have been taken on board.
CONTENT: this proposal amends the VAT Directive as regards the introduction of detailed technical measures for the operation of the definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States. It is intended to replace the transitional arrangements applicable since 1 January 1993 by a definitive VAT system for intra-Union B2B trade under which domestic and cross-border transactions involving goods will be treated in the same way.
The main elements of the proposal are as follows:
Simplifying how goods are taxed : in the current VAT system, trade in goods between businesses is split into two transactions: a VAT-exempt sale in the Member State of origin and a taxed acquisition in the Member State of destination.
It is proposed that cross-border B2B supplies of goods within the Union should be combined into a single type of transaction for VAT purposes: an intra-Union supply of goods. A definition of the concept of intra-Union supply of goods is integrated.
Place of supply rules : the combination of the definition of intra-Union supplies of goods and the new proposed place of supply rule ensures the taxation of cross-border B2B supply of goods in the Union in the Member State of destination.
Chargeability of the tax : an amendment is proposed that determines a single rule for the chargeability of VAT on intra-Union supplies. According to this rule VAT shall become chargeable on issue of the invoice, or on expiry of the time limit if no invoice has been issued by that time (fifteenth day of the month following that in which the chargeable event occurs).
Person liable for payment of VAT : the principle remains that VAT shall be payable by any taxable person carrying out a taxable supply of goods or services, unless in other provisions, it is stipulated that VAT is payable by another person.
As an exception, a new Article is proposed according to which VAT shall be payable by the person to whom the goods are supplied insofar he is a certified taxable person if the goods are supplied by a taxable person not established within the territory of the Member State in which the VAT is due.
As regards intra-Union supplies of goods , the supplier shall, in principle, be liable for the payment of the VAT in the Member State of arrival of the goods except where the supplier is not established in the Member State of taxation and the customer is a certified taxable person. In the latter case, the customer will pay the VAT due by way of reverse charge in the Member State of arrival of the goods.
Identification : an amendment is proposed according to which Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that a non-taxable legal person who is the recipient of an intra-Union supply is identified by means of an individual number.
Reduced administrative formalities : the changes reboot the self-policing character of VAT and will reduce the amount of administrative steps that need to be taken by businesses when they sell to other companies in other Member States
Intra-Union supplies of goods should under the proposed system no longer be included in the recapitulative statements. The principle of VAT being charged by the supplier on the intraUnion supply re-installs the self-policing character of VAT. Consequently, ensuring an administrative follow-up to the physical flow of goods through the recapitulative statement within the Union is no longer justified.
Single online portal : in order to make the change to VAT rules as seamless as possible for businesses, the proposed amendments would introduce the necessary provisions to put in place an online portal or 'One Stop Shop' for all business-to-business (B2B) EU traders to sort out their VAT. This system will also be available to companies outside the EU who want to sell to other businesses within the Union and who would otherwise have to register for VAT in every Member State. Once in force, these businesses will simply have to appoint one intermediary in the EU to take care of VAT for them.
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)354
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0074/2019
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A8-0028/2019
- ESC: CES2779/2018
- ESC: CES3429/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE630.755
- Committee draft report: PE629.628
- Contribution: COM(2018)0329
- Contribution: COM(2018)0329
- Legislative proposal: COM(2018)0329
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2018)0329
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE629.628
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE630.755
- Legislative proposal: COM(2018)0329 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)354
- Contribution: COM(2018)0329
- Contribution: COM(2018)0329
- ESC: CES2779/2018
- ESC: CES3429/2018
Votes
A8-0028/2019 - Fulvio Martusciello - Proposition de la Commission #
Amendments | Dossier |
56 |
2018/0164(CNS)
2018/11/28
ECON
56 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 5 a (new) Having regard to the European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 October 2018 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards harmonising and simplifying certain rules in the value added tax system and introducing the definitive system for the taxation of trade between Member States (COM(2017)0569 – C80363/2017 –2017/0251(CNS));
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 5 b (new) Having regard to the European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 October 2018 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards rates of value added tax (COM(2018)0020 –C8- 0023/2018 – 2018/0005(CNS));
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 5 c (new) Having regard to the European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 July 2018 on the amended proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in the field of value-added tax (COM(2017)0706 – C8-0441/2017 – 2017/0248(CNS));
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) When the Council adopted in 1967 the common system of value added tax (VAT) by means of Council Directives 62/227/EEC24 and 67/228/EEC25 , the commitment was made to establish a definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States operating in a similar way as it would within a single Member State. Since the political and technical conditions were not ripe for such a system, when the fiscal frontiers between Member States were abolished by the end of 1992 transitional VAT arrangements were adopted. Council Directive 2006/112/EC26 , which is currently in force, provides that these transitional rules have to be replaced by definitive arrangements based in principle on the taxation in the Member State of origin of the supply of goods or services. However, these rules have now been in place for several decades, resulting in a complex transitional VAT system prone to intra- EU cross-border VAT fraud. These transitional arrangements suffer from numerous shortcomings, which result in the VAT system being neither fully efficient nor compatible with the requirements of a true single market. _________________ 24 First Council Directive 67/227/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes (OJ 71, 14.4.1967, p. 1301). 25 Second Council Directive 67/228/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes — Structure and procedures for application of the common system of value added tax (OJ 71, 14.4.1967, p. 1303). 26 Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1).
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission, in its VAT Action Plan30 , sets out the amendments to the VAT system that would be necessary in order to develop such a destination-based system for intra-Union trade by means of the taxation of cross-border supplies. The Council subsequently reaffirmed the conclusions of that Action Plan and stated, inter alia, that in its view the principle of taxation at origin as envisaged for the definitive VAT system should be replaced by the principle of taxation in the Member State of destination31 . That change may help reduce cross-border VAT fraud, estimated to be EUR 50 billion in 2015. _________________ 30 Action Plan on VAT – Towards a single EU VAT area - Time to decide (COM(2016) 148final of 7.4.2016. 31 See: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/p ress-releases/2016/05/25-conclusions-vat- action-plan/
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4 a) In order to guarantee an efficient cooperation between Member States, the Commission shall guarantee the transparency of the system, notably with the annual compulsory publication of frauds committed in each Member State. Transparency is also important in order to understand the scale of the fraud, to raise the awareness of the general public and to put pressure on Member States.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) The overall rule for supplies of goods, including intra-Union supplies of goods, and for supplies of services should be that the supplier is liable for the payment of the VAT. These new principles will enable the Member States to better fight VAT fraud, especially Missing Trader Intra-Community (MTIC), estimated to amount to at least €50 billion a year.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14 a) Strict criteria, applied in a harmonised way by all Member States, need to be put in place to determine which enterprises can benefit from the status of the certified taxable person, and common rules and provisions resulting in fines and penalties for those who do not comply with them should be established.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 b (new) (14 b) The Commission shall be responsible to present further guidelines and verify the proper application by Member States of these harmonised criteria across the Union.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new) (25 a) A high level of non-compliance generates not only economic losses for compliant taxable persons but also threatens the cohesion and coherence of the fiscal system and creates a generalised feeling of unfairness through the distortion of competition. An efficient and understandable system is key to generating public revenues and to ownership by both citizens and companies.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 b (new) (25 b) As tax authorities in the Member States of consumption's reactions will be slower and their means of action more limited, given that most of the relevant data and auditing powers will be in the hands of the Member State of identification, a compensation mechanism shall be put in place in order to safeguard VAT revenues and incentivise Member States of identification to act.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 c (new) (25 c) In order to compensate for sudden shocks to VAT revenues across Member States arising from fiscal losses directly and solely caused by the switch to the new regime introduced by this Directive, the Commission shall establish a dedicated compensation mechanism, operational for two years after the entry into force of this Directive. The compensation mechanism shall be financed by the Member States of identification who fail to act on VAT fraud or who are not efficient at VAT collection.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 a (new) (26 a) Statistics show that fraudsters take advantage of the weakness of the system and follow the development of the economy as well as the dynamic growth of demand for certain supplies. It is therefore necessary to set up a system dynamic enough to cope with harmful practices and to reduce the level of both voluntary (fraud) and involuntary non- compliance.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 b (new) (26 b) With particular focus on the needs of SMEs engaging in intra-Community cross-border businesses and in order to facilitate trade and increase legal certainty in the single market, the Commission, in cooperation with Member States, should establish a comprehensive and publicly accessible Union VAT Web information portal for businesses. That multilingual portal should provide quick, up-to-date and accurate access to relevant information about the implementation of the VAT system in the different Member States and in particular about the correct VAT rates for different goods and services in the different Member States, as well as the conditions for zero-rate. Such a portal might also help to address the current VAT gap.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 c (new) (26 c) The One Stop Shop is the core of the new destination-based system without which complexity of the VAT system and the administrative burden would increase significantly. To ensure interoperability, ease of use and future fraud-proofing, OSS for businesses should operate with a harmonised cross-border IT system, based on common standards and allowing for automatic retrieval and input of data, for example, through the use of unified standard forms.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 8 (4 a) Article 8 is replaced by the following: "Article 8 If the Commission considers that the provisions laid down in Articles 6 and 7 are no longer justified, particularly in terms of fair competition or own resources, it shall present appropriate proposals to the
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Where the applicant is a taxable person who has been granted the status of an authorised economic operator for customs purposes, the criteria in paragraph 2 shall be deemed to have been met for the purpose of this Directive.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (a a) the absence of any record of serious criminal offences relating to the economic activity of the applicant, such as, but not limited to: (i) money laundering (ii) tax evasion and tax fraud (iii) abuse of Union funds and programmes (iv) bankruptcy or insolvency fraud (v) insurance fraud or other financial fraud (vi) bribery and/or corruption (vii) cybercrime (viii) participation in a criminal organisation (ix) offences in the field of competition law (x) direct or indirect involvement in terrorist activities
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 2 – point c (c) evidence of financial solvency of the applicant during the last three years, which shall be deemed to be proven either where the applicant has good financial standing, which enables him to fulfil his commitments, with due regard to the characteristics of the type of business activity concerned, or through the production of guarantees provided by insurance or other financial institutions or by other economically reliable third parties. The applicant must possess a bank account in a financial institution established in the Union.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 2 – point c (c) evidence of financial solvency of the applicant, which shall be deemed to be proven either where the applicant has good financial standing, which enables him to fulfil his commitments, with due regard to the characteristics of the type of business activity concerned, or through the production of guarantees provided by insurance or other financial institutions or by other economically reliable third parties for the period necessary to establish that the applicant is solvent.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. In order to ensure a harmonised interpretation in the granting of the certified taxable person status, the Commission shall adopt by means of an implementing act further guidance for Member States regarding the evaluation of those criteria, which shall be valid across the Union. The first implementing act shall be adopted no later than one month after the entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The criteria set out in paragraph 2 shall not be subject to interpretation by the Member States. To ensure a coherent understanding and implementation of the relevant criteria across the Member States, the Commission shall publish further guidance, including clearly defined procedures for correct application.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. To ensure a level playing field and discourage implicit discrimination, the tax authorities when assessing the applicant´s eligibility for the status of certified taxable person against the criteria set out in paragraph 2(b) and (c) shall take into account the size and the nature of the applicant´s economic activity.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. To encourage applications for the certified taxable person status, the Commission shall introduce a tailored procedure for Small and Medium Enterprises.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 A taxable person who applies for the status of a certified taxable person shall supply all the information required by the tax authorities in order to enable them to take a decision. Tax authorities should be subject to harmonised criteria across Member States regarding the supply of information.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 A taxable person who applies for the status of a certified taxable person shall supply all
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Where the status of certified taxable person is granted, that information shall be made available via the VIES system. Changes to that status shall be updated in the system without delay.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112//EC Article 13a – paragraph 5 5. Where the application is refused, the grounds for refusal shall be notified by the tax authorities to the applicant together with the decision. Member States shall ensure that the applicant is granted a right of appeal against any decision to refuse an application. An appeal procedure harmonised at the Union level shall be established by 1 June 2020 by means of an implementing act, and shall include the obligation for Member States to inform other Member States of that refusal and the reasons accompanying that decision through their tax authorities. The appeal procedure shall be initiated within a reasonable time of the announcement of the decision to the applicant, to be determined by the implementing act, and should take into account any implemented remedy procedure.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 5 5. Where the application is refused, the grounds for refusal shall be notified by the tax authorities to the applicant together with the decision. Member States shall ensure that the applicant is granted a right of appeal against any decision to refuse an application. Shall the refusal of certified taxable person be carried after the appeal no application thereafter should be considered in that or any other Member State for a period of five years.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 5 5. Where the application is refused, the grounds for refusal shall be notified without delay by the tax authorities to the applicant together with the decision which clearly states the grounds for refusal. Member States shall ensure that the applicant is granted a right of appeal within a reasonable timeframe against any decision to refuse an application.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Where the application is refused, the decision as well as the grounds for refusal shall be notified to tax authorities of other Member States.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 6 6. The taxable person who has been granted the status of certified taxable person shall inform the tax authorities with
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 6 6. The taxable person who has been granted the status of certified taxable person shall inform the tax authorities without delay of any factor arising after the decision was taken, which may affect or influence the continuation of that status. The tax status shall be withdrawn by the tax authorities where the criteria set out in paragraph 2 are no longer met. Where the status of a certified taxable person is granted, that information shall be made available via the VIES system. Changes to that status shall be updated in the system without delay.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. A taxable person who has been refused the status of a certified taxable person, or who on his or her own initiative has informed thetax authority that he or she no longer meets the criteria set out in paragraph 2, may no earlier than six months from the date of the refusal of that status or its withdrawal reapplyfor a certified taxable person status provided that all relevant criteria are met.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. To ensure uniform standards for monitoring of continued eligibility for the status of certified taxable person and the withdrawal of the tax status within and across Member States, the Commission shall adopt relevant guidelines.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Where the applicant has been denied the status of an authorised economic operator in accordance with the Union Customs Code during the last three years, the applicant shall not be granted the status of a certified taxable person.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 13a – paragraph 7 7. The status of a certified taxable person in one Member State shall be recognised by the tax authorities of all the Member States. National mechanisms will continue to apply for internal VAT tax disputes between the tax payer concerned and the national tax authority;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 36a – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where goods are supplied in the context of a chain transaction situation, the transport or dispatch from one Member State to another referred to in point (b) of Article 14(4)(3) shall be ascribed to the supply made by the
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 36a – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the intermediary operator communicates the name of the Member State of arrival of the goods to the
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 36a – paragraph 3 – point a (a) 'chain transaction situation' shall mean a situation where successive supplies of the same goods by taxable persons give rise to a single transport or dispatch of those goods from one Member State to another and where both the intermediary operator and the provider are
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 36a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) 'intermediary operator' shall mean a supplier in the chain other than the first supplier or customer, who dispatches or transports the goods, himself or by a third party on his behalf;
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 36a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) '
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 50 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 100 – paragraph 1 a (new) (50 a) In Article 100, a new paragraph 1a is inserted: "The Commission is empowered to amend the scope of Annex IIIa by means of an implementing act, when necessary and provided there is evidence related to distortion of competition justifying the update of the list of supplies of goods and services."
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 56 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 145 – paragraph 1 (56 a) in Article 145, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. The Commission shall, where appropriate, as soon as possible, present to the European Parliament and to the Council proposals designed to delimit the scope of the exemptions provided for in Articles 143 and 144 and to lay down the detailed rules for their implementation.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 59 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 150 – paragraph 1 (59 a) in Article 150, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. The Commission shall, where appropriate, as soon as possible, present to the European Parliament and to the Council proposals designed to delimit the scope of the exemptions provided for in Article 148 and to lay down the detailed rules for their implementation.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 68 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 166 (68 a) Article 166 is replaced by the following: "Article 166 The Commission shall, where appropriate, as soon as possible, present to the European Parliament and to the Council proposals concerning common arrangements for applying VAT to the transactions referred to in Sections 1 and 2.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 123 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 293 – paragraph 1 – introductory part (123 a)In Article 293, paragraph 1, the introductory part is replaced by the following: "Every four years starting from the adoption of this Directive, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and to the Council, on the basis of information obtained from the Member States, a report on the application of this Chapter, together, where appropriate and taking into account the need to ensure the long-term convergence of national regulations, with proposals on the following subjects:
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 166 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 395 – paragraph 3 (166 a)In Article 395, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: "3. Within three months of giving the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and to the Council either an appropriate proposal or, should it object to the derogation requested, a communication setting out its objections.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 166 b (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 396 – paragraph 3 (166 b)In Article 396, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following "3. Within three months of giving the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and to the Council either an appropriate proposal or, should it object to the derogation requested, a communication setting out its objections.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 169 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 404 a (new) (169 a)The following new Article 404a is inserted after Article 404: "Article 404a Within four years from the adoption of Council Directive (EU) .../...* +, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and to the Council, on the basis of information obtained from the Member States, a report on the implementation and application of the new provisions of this Directive, where appropriate [and taking into account the need to ensure the long-term convergence of national regulations], with proposals." (* Council Directive (EU) .../... of ... amending ... (OJ ...). + OJ: Please insert in the text the number of the Directive contained in document PE-CONS ... (2018/0164(CNS)) and insert the number, date, title and OJ reference of that Directive in the footnote.)
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 169 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 404 (169 a)Article 404
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 169 b (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 404 b (new) (169 b)The following new Article 404b is inserted after Article 404a: "Article 404b Within two years from the adoption of Council Directive (EU) .../...* +, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the effectiveness of the exchange of the relevant information between Member States Tax Administrations, given the importance of the mutual trust for the definitive VAT regime to succeed." (* Council Directive (EU) .../... of ... amending ... (OJ ...). + OJ: Please insert in the text the number of the Directive contained in document PE-CONS ... (2018/0164(CNS)) and insert the number, date, title and OJ reference of that Directive in the footnote.)
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 173 a (new) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 411a (173 a)The following new Article 411a is inserted: "Article 411a By 1 June 2020, the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall establish a comprehensive, multilingual and publicly accessible Union VAT Web Information Portal on which businesses and consumers can quickly and effectively obtain accurate information on VAT rates – including which goods or services benefit from reduced rates or exemptions – and all relevant information on the implementation of the definitive VAT system in the different Member States. In complement to the Portal, an automated notification mechanism shall be set up. That mechanism shall ensure automatic notifications to tax payers on changes and updates to the VAT rates of Member States. Such automatic notifications shall be activated before the change becomes applicable and at the latest five days after the decision has been taken."
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 34 Article
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 b (new) Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 Article 49a Article 1 b Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 (2) The following new Article 49a is added: "Article 49a Member States and the Commission shall establish a common system of collecting statistics on intra-Community VAT fraud and involuntary non-compliance and shall publish on a yearly basis national estimates of VAT losses resulting from that fraud, as well as estimates for the Union as a whole. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the practical arrangements for such a statistical system. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 58(2)."
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new) Article 2 a Customs transit system Two years after the expiry of the transposition date of this Directive, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the consequences of the introduction of the definitive system on the customs transit system in the European Union. The Commission shall propose, where appropriate, amendments to the relevant EU legislation, including this directive.
source: 630.755
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
council/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3626*&MEET_DATE=22/06/2018New
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/calendar/?Category=meeting&Page=1&daterange=&dateFrom=2018-06-22&dateTo=2018-06-22 |
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
Old
New
|
docs/5 |
Old
New
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/docs |
|
events/4/summary/15 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/summary/17 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32096&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=32096 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
ECON/8/13272 |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Directive 2006/112/EC
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Directive 2006/112/EC 2004/0079(CNS)
|
procedure/instrument/2 |
2004/0079(CNS)
|
procedure/legal_basis |
Old
New
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 113 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0074_en.docx |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/5/date |
Old
2018-09-27T00:00:00New
2018-09-28T00:00:00 |
docs/6/date |
Old
2018-09-24T00:00:00New
2018-09-25T00:00:00 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=en
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32096&j=0&l=en
|
docs/5/date |
Old
2018-09-28T00:00:00New
2018-09-27T00:00:00 |
docs/6/date |
Old
2018-09-25T00:00:00New
2018-09-24T00:00:00 |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)625184New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)625184 |
docs/5/date |
Old
2018-09-28T00:00:00New
2018-09-27T00:00:00 |
docs/6/date |
Old
2018-09-25T00:00:00New
2018-09-24T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-629628_EN.html
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-630755_EN.html
|
events/2/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
events/6/body |
EP
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.628
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.755
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2779)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3429)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
|
events/0/docs/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.628New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.628 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.755New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.755 |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0028_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0028_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0074_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0074_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0028&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0028_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0074New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0074_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links/Research document |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/8/13272New
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting final decision |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
ECON/8/13272
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
committees/0/date |
2018-06-20T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52018PC0329:EN
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|