Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | DELLI Karima ( Verts/ALE) | MUSELIER Renaud ( PPE), REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY Christine ( S&D), FOSTER Jacqueline ( ECR), RIQUET Dominique ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | HOWARTH John ( S&D) | Ivan JAKOVČIĆ ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 172
Legal Basis:
TFEU 172Events
PURPOSE: to adapt the trans-European transport networks in the event of Brexit without agreement.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2019/495 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union.
CONTENT: this Regulation amends Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the mechanism for connecting Europe facility (CEF) to provide new maritime links between Ireland and other EU countries in the corridor of the North Sea-Mediterranean Central Network corridor of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) in the event that the United Kingdom leaves the EU without a negotiated agreement. It also introduces a limited number of targeted amendments to ensure the continuity of infrastructure investment and to provide legal clarity and certainty for infrastructure planning.
Realignment of the central network corridor North Sea - Mediterranean
In order to avoid a situation in which the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor is separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor shall include new maritime links between the Irish ports and the ports of Belgium, France and the Netherlands which are part of that Corridor.
The Regulation provides for the ports of Shannon Foynes, Dublin and Cork on the Irish side to be linked to the ports of Le Havre, Calais and Dunkirk (France), Zeebrugge, Ghent and Antwerp (Belgium) and Terneuzen, Rotterdam and Amsterdam (Netherlands) on this corridor in order to provide a direct link between Ireland and the rest of the EU 27.
Investment priorities
The Regulation introduces a new funding priority for the connecting Europe facility, namely investments into equipment and infrastructure for security and checks on external borders should be a prioritised action in the last phase of implementation of the current programming period of the Connecting Europe Facility. To address those needs, the Commission should propose a new annual work programme.
The Commission shall carry out, by 2021, an early revision of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 on the Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, to take into account possible changes in the flow of goods once the United Kingdom leaves the Union.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 28.3.2019. The Regulation shall apply on the day following the date on which the 2013 CEF Regulation ceases to apply in the United Kingdom.
The European Parliament adopted by 573 votes to 21, with 25 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 as regards the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Ensuring Ireland's connectivity to continental Europe
In order to take into account the exceptional circumstances following the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union, the proposal aims to amend Regulation (EC) No 1316/2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) as regards the realignment of the trans-European transport network to provide new maritime links between Ireland and other EU countries and the continuity of infrastructure funding.
The amended text underlines the importance of developing the necessary infrastructure to maintain and support existing and future trade flows between Ireland and continental Europe. Maritime links are an essential means of ensuring Ireland's direct connectivity with continental Europe.
Adaptation of the North Sea - Mediterranean corridor
In order to avoid a situation in which the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor is separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor should include new maritime links between the Irish ports and the ports of Belgium, France and the Netherlands which are part of that Corridor.
In addition, a link between the North Sea – Mediterranean Corridor and the Atlantic Corridor via Le Havre, which is on the Atlantic Corridor, should ensure better connectivity and integration of the internal market.
In concrete terms, the proposed Regulation should amend Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 and modify the route of sections of the North Sea-Mediterranean Corridor by adding new maritime links between, on the one hand, Dublin and Cork, the Irish ports of the central network, and, on the other hand, the ports of the North Sea-Mediterranean Corridor located in France, Belgium and the Netherlands (Le Havre / Calais / Dunkirk - Zeebrugge / Terneuzen - Gent - Antwerp / Rotterdam/ Amsterdam ”.
Investment priorities
Investments into equipment and infrastructure for security and checks on external borders should be a prioritised action in the last phase of implementation of the current programming period of the Connecting Europe Facility.
To meet these needs, the Commission should propose a new annual work programme.
The Commission should, by 2021, carry out an early review of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, in order to take into account possible changes in the flow of goods once the United Kingdom leaves the Union.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Karima DELLI (Greens/EFA, FR) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union.
Since the United Kingdom has notified its intention to withdraw from the EU, Union legislation should in principle cease to apply to the United Kingdom from 30 March 2019. If there are no transitional provisions in a withdrawal agreement, the United Kingdom will no longer be a member of the North Sea - Mediterranean corridor from the date of withdrawal.
The European Commission is therefore proposing to review the route of the North Sea-Mediterranean Corridor in order to avoid splitting it into two distinct parts, which would have the effect of cutting Ireland off from the mainland.
The committee recommended that the position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading in the framework of the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows.
Ensuring connectivity between Ireland and mainland Europe
In order to take account of the exceptional circumstances arising from the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, Members stressed the need to provide for connectivity between Ireland and mainland Europe by modifying the route and composition of the TEN-T corridors with a view to incorporating the maritime links between Irish and continental ports in the core and comprehensive networks.
North Sea-Mediterranean Corridor
In order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor being separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, Members considered it essential to create direct links with the territories and ports closest to Ireland on the existing corridor.
They also considered it vital to ensure that Ireland and Northern Ireland (in accordance with the Good Friday / Belfast agreement of 1998) are connected to the other Member States participating in the North Sea-Mediterranean corridor.
Members suggested that the proposed regulation should amend Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 and modify the route of sections of the North Sea-Mediterranean Corridor by adding new maritime links between, on the one hand, Dublin and Cork, the Irish ports of the central network, and, on the other hand, the ports of the North Sea-Mediterranean Corridor located in France, Belgium and the Netherlands (Le Havre / Calais / Dunkirk - Zeebrugge / Terneuzen - Gent - Antwerp / Rotterdam).
Atlantic Corridor
In a Europe of 27, in which France, Belgium and the Netherlands are geographically the closest Member States to Ireland, Members considered that the Atlantic Corridor should be realigned to connect Ireland to it and take account of existing and future flows. Accordingly, they proposed incorporating Ireland into the Atlantic Corridor and, where appropriate, incorporating new French ports into the core network, taking into account existing flows.
The Commission and the Member States should speed up the procedure for revising Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a so as to adapt the network maps to the changes in the flow of goods after the United Kingdom leaves the Union.
Infrastructure
Members proposed mobilising the funds remaining in the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2019-2020 to adapt core network ports to the new flows between Ireland and the EU27, as well as to the new constraints associated with cross-Channel traffic.
In addition, the programmes of the transport component of the Connecting Europe Facility should make provision for calls for proposals to finance the development of new or existing transport infrastructure, to provide maritime links between Irish and continental ports in the core and comprehensive networks and adjustments to those links in the event of the re-establishment of an external border with the United Kingdom.
Emergency fund
The Commission should establish financial support complementing the CEF in the form of an emergency fund for adjustment to the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the Union. The aim of that fund shall be to offset the negative impact of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal by helping transport stakeholders and local authorities establish in advance new maritime freight routes and make it easier for goods and persons to cross the border between the Union and the United Kingdom.
PURPOSE: to amend Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: a Union funding instrument, the Connecting Europe Facility , was established by Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The aim of the Connecting Europe Facility is to enable projects of common interest to be prepared and implemented within the framework of the trans-European networks policy in the sectors of transport, telecommunications and energy.
Part I of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 sets out a list of nine core network corridors . Those corridors constitute an instrument to facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network. They should contribute to the cohesion of the core network through improved territorial cooperation, address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate interoperability, modal integration and multimodal operations. Member States are required to participate in core network corridors.
The United Kingdom is part of the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor (the ‘NSM corridor’) which includes links between Belfast, Dublin and Cork on the island of Ireland and links in Great Britain from Glasgow and Edinburgh in the north to Folkestone and Dover in the south. Moreover, United Kingdom sections and nodes are included in the table of ‘pre-identified sections including projects’ of the core network corridors included in Part I of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013.
The United Kingdom submitted notification of its intention to withdraw from the Union. This means that, unless a ratified withdrawal agreement establishes another date, all Union primary and secondary law will cease to apply to the United Kingdom from 30 March 2019, (‘the withdrawal date’). The United Kingdom will then become a third country, a non-member of the Union. If transitional arrangements are not established in a withdrawal agreement, the United Kingdom will no longer be a member of the NSM corridor from 30 March 2019 .
Given the degree of integration between the Irish and United Kingdom economies, and Ireland’s location on the geographical edges of the Union, Ireland will be significantly affected by the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the Union. The United Kingdom is a vital transport link between Ireland and the continent.
The Commission proposes to revise the route alignment of the NSM corridor in order to prevent the corridor from being cut into two distinct parts, with Ireland no longer linked to the continental EU.
CONTENT: in order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor being separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor should include maritime links between the Irish core ports and core ports of Belgium and the Netherlands .
The proposed Regulation, by amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013, would adjust the NSM corridor’s route alignment by adding new maritime links between the Irish core ports of Dublin and Cork and the NSM corridor’s ports in Belgium (Zeebrugge, Antwerp) and the Netherlands (Rotterdam), It would take effect from the date when the CEF Regulation no longer applies to the United Kingdom, and therefore the United Kingdom no longer be part of the NSM corridor.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)393
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2019/495
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 085I 27.03.2019, p. 0016
- Draft final act: 00022/2019/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0191/2019
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2019)001678
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)001678
- Contribution: COM(2018)0568
- Contribution: COM(2018)0568
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0009/2019
- Committee opinion: PE632.116
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.003
- Committee draft report: PE630.498
- Contribution: COM(2018)0568
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4862/2018
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3598/2018
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2018)0568
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR3598/2018
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4862/2018
- Committee draft report: PE630.498
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.003
- Committee opinion: PE632.116
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)001678
- Draft final act: 00022/2019/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)393
- Contribution: COM(2018)0568
- Contribution: COM(2018)0568
- Contribution: COM(2018)0568
Votes
A8-0009/2019 - Karima Delli - Am 25 13/03/2019 17:09:55.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
58 |
2018/0299(COD)
2018/11/27
REGI
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) This proposal will take into account the unique and special status of Northern Ireland and the difficulties the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union will pose on the border in the island of Ireland.
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Ensuring that transport policy on the island of Ireland contributes to the continued facilitation of the provisions of the Belfast / Good Friday Agreement in line with the policies of the Union.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 Annex I – point 2 – section ‘North Sea – Mediterranean’ – line 1 a (new) “Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin/Corcaigh/Cork – Le Havre/Calais/Dunkerque – Zeebrugge/Antwerpen/Rotterdam”.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 a (new) In Part I of Annex I, point 2 (‘Core network corridors’), in the ‘Atlantic’ section, after the line ‘Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria – Bergara – Bilbao/Bordeaux – Paris – Le Havre/Metz – Mannheim/Strasbourg’, the following lines are inserted: “Shannon Foynes – Dublin – Rosslare – Waterford – Cork – Brest – Roscoff – Cherbourg – Caen – Le Havre – Rouen – Paris” “Dublin – Cork – Saint Nazaire – Nantes – Tours”
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 b (new) (1b) In the event that no deal is reached between the United Kingdom and the European Union and in respect of the unique and special status of Northern Ireland, takes note of the areas of cooperation listed in the Good Friday Agreement/Belfast Agreement of 1998, particularly with regards to cross-border cooperation transport and infrastructure development. The European Union should take reasonable steps and in full respect to subsidiarity to ensure that there is no hardening of the border in the island of Ireland and that cross-border cooperation continues.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) A European Union funding instrument, the Connecting Europe Facility, was established by Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council8 . The aim of the Connecting Europe Facility is to enable projects of cross border and common interest to be prepared and implemented within the framework of the trans- European networks policy in the sectors of transport, telecommunications and energy.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The United Kingdom is part of the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor, which includes links between Belfast, Dublin and Cork/Shannon Foynes on the island of Ireland, and links in Great Britain from Glasgow and Edinburgh in the north to Folkestone and Dover in the south. The United Kingdom’s sections and nodes are included in the table of ‘pre-identified sections including projects’ of the core network corridors included in Part I of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013. In the context of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union, Ireland's Western Arc stretching from Derry, Sligo and Galway will be included in the North Sea-Mediterranean Corridor.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor being separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe,
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In a Europe of 27, in which France is geographically the closest Member State to Ireland, the Atlantic Corridor should be realigned to connect Ireland to it and take into account existing and future flows.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the connection between Ireland and the other Member States on the
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the connection between Ireland, Northern Ireland (in accordance to the Good Friday Agreement 1998) and the other Member States on the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor is crucial for ongoing and future infrastructure investments and for providing legal clarity and certainty for infrastructure planning.
source: 630.697
2018/12/10
TRAN
46 amendments...
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) In order to take account of the exceptional circumstances arising from the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, connectivity between Ireland and mainland Europe should be provided for by modifying the route and composition of the TEN-T corridors with a view to incorporating the maritime links between Irish and continental ports in the core and comprehensive networks.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) In order to take account of the exceptional circumstances arising from the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, this Regulation establishes the possibility of incorporating into a corridor of the core network ports from the comprehensive network.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) In view of the insular nature of Ireland, maritime links represent a means of ensuring its direct connectivity with mainland Europe.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor being separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, particularly with the closest ports, the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor should include maritime links between the Irish core ports and core ports of France, Belgium and the Netherlands. A link between the North Sea – Mediterranean Corridor and the Atlantic Corridor via Le Havre should be established to ensure better connectivity and integration of the internal market.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor being separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, particularly with its geographically closest neighbours, the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor should include maritime links between the Irish core ports and core ports of France, Belgium and the Netherlands.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor being separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor and the ‘Atlantic’ Core Network Corridor should include maritime links between the Irish core or comprehensive network ports and core ports of France, Belgium and the Netherlands.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor being separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure the safe and efficient connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor should include maritime links between the Irish core ports and core ports of Belgium
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor being separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor should include maritime links between the Irish core ports and core ports of France, Belgium and the Netherlands.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In a Europe in which, due to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, France is geographically the closest EU country to Ireland, the Atlantic Corridor should be realigned and substantially developed to connect Ireland to it and take into account existing and future traffic between Ireland and France. Northern ports such as Le Havre, Calais, Dunkirk or Boulogne sur Mer are essential elements of this current and future connection.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In order to take account of the exceptional circumstances arising from the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, the programmes of the transport component of the Connecting Europe Facility should include calls for proposals to finance maritime links between Irish and continental ports in the core and comprehensive networks.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, a reconfiguration of transport infrastructure and improved transport connections and networks will be necessary to guarantee the efficient movement of goods and passengers.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In a Europe of 27, in which France, Belgium and the Netherlands are geographically closest to Ireland, the Atlantic Corridor should be realigned to connect Ireland to it, taking into account existing and future flows.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In a Europe of 27, in which France, Belgium and the Netherlands are geographically closest to Ireland, the Atlantic Corridor should be realigned to connect Ireland to it, taking into account existing and future flows.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the connection between Ireland and the other Member States on the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor is crucial for ongoing and future infrastructure investments and for providing legal clarity and certainty for infrastructure planning, as well as ensuring the efficient functioning of the internal market, which depends directly on the transport and movement of goods.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the connection between Ireland and the other Member States on the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor, as well as the Atlantic Core Network, is crucial for ongoing and future infrastructure investments and for providing legal clarity and certainty for infrastructure planning.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the connection between Ireland and the other Member States on the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor and the Atlantic Corridor is crucial for ongoing and future infrastructure investments and for providing legal clarity and certainty for infrastructure planning.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Ensuring the connection between Ireland and the other Member States on the Atlantic and North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridors is crucial for ongoing and future infrastructure investments and for providing legal clarity and certainty for infrastructure planning.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Taking note of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, the Commission should carry out an early revision of Regulation 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, initially scheduled for 2023 at the latest, in order to adapt the routes of the corridors so as to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and to increase the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to ensure optimum control of imports and exports of fishery products, an office of the European Fisheries Control Agency should be located in Boulogne sur Mer to perform customs and veterinary checks.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 b (new) (7b) In view of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal, it is essential to develop the appropriate infrastructure — whether new or existing — to maintain trade flows between Ireland and mainland Europe which previously passed over the United Kingdom’s ‘land bridge’.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 b (new) (7b) Investment should include the funds necessary for the adaptation of transport infrastructure, in particular interconnectivity and multi-modality of ports with rail transport.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 c (new) (7c) To support the creation of new transport infrastructure and the modernisation of existing infrastructure, it is therefore essential to include new nodes and links in the core network, in particular for maritime connections.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 d (new) (7d) In addition, while the core network is the backbone, comprising those parts of the network which are of the greatest strategic importance to the Union, it is also necessary to include new nodes and links, in particular ports, in the comprehensive network in order to ensure the connectivity of all regions of the Union.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 e (new) (7e) With the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, several port nodes currently in the comprehensive network, in particular French ports such as Brest, Roscoff, Cherbourg and Boulogne, will have to cope with increased goods traffic, and should therefore receive increased aid and support.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 1 Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 is amended as set out in
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier a (new) Article 1a As part of the revision scheduled to be carried out before 2023 at the latest, Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 is amended as set out in Annex Ia (new) to this Regulation.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 It shall apply from the day
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph -1 (new) -1 In Part I of the Annex, point 2 (‘Core network corridors’), in the ‘Atlantic’ section, after the line ‘Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria – Bergara – Bilbao/Bordeaux – Paris – Le Havre/Metz – Mannheim/Strasbourg’, the following line is inserted: Shannon Foynes/ Dublin/ Cork - Antwerpen/Zeebrugge - Gent/Terneuzen - Lille - Paris
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part In Part I of the Annex
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part In Part I of Annex I, point 2 ('Core network corridors'), in the section 'North Sea – Mediterranean', after the line “Belfast – Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin – Corcaigh/Cork” the following line
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation 1316/2013 Annex I, part I, point 2 Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Annex 1 Point 2 «Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin/Corcaigh/Cork – Zeebrugge/Antwerpen/Rotterdam/Le Havre/Caen/Rouen/Cherbourg/Dunkerqu e/Calais.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 Annex I – point 2 – section 'North Sea – Mediterranean' – line 1a (new) «Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin/Corcaigh/Cork – Zeebrugge/Antwerpen/Rotterdam. Le Havre/Calais/Dunkerque/ Boulogne sur Mer -
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 Annex I – point 2 – section ‘North Sea – Mediterranean’ “Shannon Foynes/Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin/Corcaigh/Cork – Zeebrugge/Terneuzen/Gent/Antwerpen/R otterdam
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 Annex I – point 2 – section ‘North Sea – Mediterranean’ “Shannon Foynes/Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin/Corcaigh/Cork – Zeebrugge/Terneuzen/Gent/Antwerpen/R otterdam
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 Annex «Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin/Corcaigh/Cork - Le Havre - Calais - Dunkerque – Zeebrugge/Antwerpen/Rotterdam.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 Annex I — Part I — point 2 — section “North Sea — Mediterranean” «Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin/Corcaigh/Cork – Le Havre/Calais/Dunkerque – Zeebrugge/Antwerpen/Rotterdam.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 «Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin/Corcaigh/Cork – Calais/Dunkerque – Zeebrugge/Antwerpen/Rotterdam.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) 1316/2013 Annex paragraph 1 Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 Annex I – part 2 – point 2 In Part I of Annex I, point 2 (‘Core network corridors’), in the ‘Atlantic’ section, after the line ‘Aveiro - Valladolid - Vitoria-Gasteiz - Bergara - Bilbao/Bordeaux - Tours - Paris - Le Havre/Metz - Mannheim/Strasbourg’, the following line is inserted: "Shannon Foynes - Dublin - Cork - Le Havre - Rouen - Paris" In Part I of Annex I, point 2 (‘Core Network Corridors’), in the Atlantic section, the line ‘Saint Nazaire - Nantes - Tours’ is amended as follows: “Dublin - Cork - Saint Nazaire - Nantes - Tours”
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 Annex I – Part I – point 2 – section ‘Atlantic’ – line 4a (new) In Part I of the Annex, point 2 (‘Core network corridors’), in the ‘Atlantic’ section, after the line ‘Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria – Bergara – Bilbao/Bordeaux – Paris – Le Havre/Metz – Mannheim/Strasbourg’, the following lines are inserted: “Shannon Foynes – Dublin – Rosslare – Waterford – Cork – Brest – Roscoff – Cherbourg – Caen – Le Havre – Rouen – Paris” “Dublin – Cork – Saint Nazaire – Nantes – Tours”
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 a (new) In Part I of Annex I, point 2 (‘Core network corridors’), in the ‘Atlantic’ section, after the line ‘Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria – Bergara – Bilbao/Bordeaux – Paris – Le Havre/Metz – Mannheim/Strasbourg’, the following line is inserted: "Shannon Foynes - Dublin - Rosslare - Waterford - Cork - Le Havre - Rouen - Caen - Paris"
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 1 a (new) In Part I of the Annex, point 2 (‘Core network corridors’), in the ‘Atlantic’ section, the following line is inserted: Shannon Foynes - Dublin – Rosslare – Waterford - Cork – Brest – Roscoff – Saint Malo - Cherbourg – Caen - Le Havre– Rouen - Paris
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I a (new) source: 632.003
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32036&j=0&l=en
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2019-03-04T00:00:00New
2019-03-03T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3598)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3598)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4862)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.498New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-630498_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.003New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-632003_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.116New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-632116_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.116&secondRef=02New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.116 |
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0009&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0009_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0191New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0191_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.116New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.116&secondRef=02 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.116&secondRef=02New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.116 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32036&j=0&l=en
|
commission |
|
committees |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure |
|