Progress: Awaiting Council's 1st reading position
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | ||
Former Responsible Committee | TRAN | BERGKVIST Erik ( S&D) | |
Former Responsible Committee | TRAN | ULVSKOG Marita ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ENVI | PIECHA Bolesław G. ( ECR) | Marco AFFRONTE ( EFDD), Valentinas MAZURONIS ( ALDE) |
Former Committee Opinion | ITRE | SCHULZE Sven ( PPE) | Sofia SAKORAFA ( GUE/NGL), Davor ŠKRLEC ( Verts/ALE) |
Former Committee Opinion | IMCO | ŠOLTES Igor ( Verts/ALE) | Richard SULÍK ( ECR) |
Former Committee Opinion | AGRI | MÜLLER Ulrike ( ALDE) | Momchil NEKOV ( S&D), James NICHOLSON ( ECR) |
Former Committee Opinion | JURI | SVOBODA Pavel ( PPE) | Jiří MAŠTÁLKA ( GUE/NGL) |
Former Committee Opinion | PETI | WIKSTRÖM Cecilia ( ALDE) | Takis HADJIGEORGIOU ( GUE/NGL), Notis MARIAS ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 1, 1, 4, -, p, 1
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 1, 1, 4, -, p, 1Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 410 votes to 192 with 51 abstentions a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive 2000/84/EC.
The position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure has amended the Commission proposal as follows:
End of the biannual seasonal change of time
Members supported the Commission’s proposal to discontinue the time change but voted in favour of postponing the date from 2019 to 2021.
They proposed that the time change scheduled for the last Sunday in March 2021 should be the last for EU Member States wishing to keep summer time. Member States that prefer to keep the standard time, i.e. winter time, may change their time one last time on the last Sunday in October 2021. Member States should notify their decision to the Commission by 1 April 2020 at the latest.
The decision on the time zone to be applied in each Member State should be preceded by consultations and studies taking into account citizens' preferences, geographical variations, regional differences, standard working arrangements and other factors relevant to the Member State in question. Member States should therefore have sufficient time to analyse the impact of the proposal and choose the most advantageous solution for their population, while taking into account the proper functioning of the internal market.
Member States should cooperate with one another and take decisions on their envisaged time arrangements in a concerted and coordinated manner. Therefore, a coordination mechanism should be established, consisting of a designated representative from each Member State and a representative of the Commission. The coordination mechanism should discuss and assess the potential impact of any envisaged decision on a Member State’s standard times on the functioning of the internal market, in order to avoid significant disruptions.
Protecting the functioning of the internal market
Where the Commission considers that the envisaged change will significantly affect the proper functioning of the internal market, it shall inform the notifying Member State thereof.
By 31 October 2020 at the latest, the notifying Member State shall decide whether to maintain its intention or not. Where the notifying Member State decides to maintain its intention, it shall provide a detailed explanation of how it will address the negative impact of the change on the functioning of the internal market.
Where the Commission determines that the envisaged time arrangements, notified by the Member States, have the potential to significantly and permanently hamper the proper functioning of the internal market, it is empowered to adopt delegated acts to postpone the date of application of this directive by no more than 12 months and submit a legislative proposal, if appropriate.
Assessment
By 31 December 2025 at the latest the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council an evaluation report on the application and implementation of this directive, accompanied, where necessary, by a legislative proposal for its review based on a thorough impact assessment, involving all relevant stakeholders.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Marita ULVSKOG (S&D, SE) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive 2000/84/EC.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows:
End of the biannual seasonal change of time
Members proposed that the time change scheduled for the last Sunday in March 2021 should be the last for EU Member States wishing to keep summer time. Member States that prefer to keep the standard time, i.e. winter time, may change their time one last time on the last Sunday in October 2021. Member States should notify their decision to the Commission by 1 April 2020 at the latest.
Member States should cooperate with one another and take decisions on their envisaged time arrangements in a concerted and coordinated manner. Therefore, a coordination mechanism should be established, consisting of a designated representative from each Member State and a representative of the Commission. The coordination mechanism should discuss and assess the potential impact of any envisaged decision on a Member State’s standard times on the functioning of the internal market, in order to avoid significant disruptions.
Protecting the functioning of the internal market
Where the Commission considers that the envisaged change will significantly affect the proper functioning of the internal market, it shall inform the notifying Member State thereof.
By 31 October 2020 at the latest, the notifying Member State shall decide whether to maintain its intention or not. Where the notifying Member State decides to maintain its intention, it shall provide a detailed explanation of how it will address the negative impact of the change on the functioning of the internal market.
Where the Commission determines that the envisaged time arrangements, notified by the Member States, have the potential to significantly and permanently hamper the proper functioning of the internal market, it is empowered to adopt delegated acts to postpone the date of application of this Directive by no more than 12 months and submit a legislative proposal, if appropriate.
Assessment
By 31 December 2025 at the latest the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council an evaluation report on the application and implementation of this Directive, accompanied, where necessary, by a legislative proposal for its review based on a thorough impact assessment, involving all relevant stakeholders.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to end seasonal changes of time.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: EU legislation on summer-time arrangements was first introduced in 1980 with the objective of unifying existing national summer-time practices and schedules. Since 2001, EU summer-time arrangements have been governed by Directive 2000/84/EC setting out the obligation on all Member States to switch to summer-time on the last Sunday of March and to switch back to their standard time ("winter-time") on the last Sunday of October.
The system of bi-annual clock changes has been increasingly questioned , by citizens, by the European Parliament, and by a growing number of Member States.
In its resolution of 8 February 2018, Parliament asked the Commission to carry out an assessment of summer-time arrangements as provided for in Directive 2000/84/EC and, where appropriate, to submit a proposal for revision. The Commission has also carried out a public consultation, which generated around 4.6 million replies, of which 84% were in favour of discontinuing the bi-annual clock changes while 16% wanted to keep them.
Against this background, the Commission considers that the arrangements for summer time should be terminated in a coordinated manner in order to avoid any major disruption to the internal market caused by divergences between Member States in this area.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: based on the evidence available on the effects of the EU summer-time arrangements, the conclusion can be drawn that a continued harmonised regime – whereby all Member States abolish the bi-annual time changes – would remain beneficial for the functioning of the internal market.
Effects on other areas are rather inconclusive and are likely to depend on the geographical location and whether Member States choose to stay with permanent summer- or permanent winter-time. The impact of this choice therefore needs to be assessed at national level. A change of system will also bring about transition costs that should be considered.
CONTENT: the Commission proposes to end seasonal changes in European time from 2019 onwards, while leaving the Member States free to decide whether to permanently apply summer time or winter time. Directive 2000/84/EC will be repealed. The proposed directive provides that the last mandatory summer-time period will start on 31 March 2019 at 1.00 a.m.
Member States wishing to return permanently to winter time may make a final change of seasonal time on Sunday 27 October 2019 (at 01.00 in the morning). From this date, seasonal time changes will no longer be possible.
Member States remain free to make changes to their standard time that are not linked to seasonal changes. In order to avoid disturbances Member States should inform the Commission of their intention to change their standard time 6 months before changes take effect.
Given that the Member States will have to apply Directive as from 1 April 2019, the Directive provides that each Member State must, by 27 April 2019 at the latest , on the basis of possible consultations and assessments at national level and in concertation with other Member States, notify the Commission of its intention to permanently apply a standard time corresponding to their current winter-time, rather than to their current summer-time .
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to end seasonal changes of time.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: EU legislation on summer-time arrangements was first introduced in 1980 with the objective of unifying existing national summer-time practices and schedules. Since 2001, EU summer-time arrangements have been governed by Directive 2000/84/EC setting out the obligation on all Member States to switch to summer-time on the last Sunday of March and to switch back to their standard time ("winter-time") on the last Sunday of October.
The system of bi-annual clock changes has been increasingly questioned , by citizens, by the European Parliament, and by a growing number of Member States.
In its resolution of 8 February 2018, Parliament asked the Commission to carry out an assessment of summer-time arrangements as provided for in Directive 2000/84/EC and, where appropriate, to submit a proposal for revision. The Commission has also carried out a public consultation, which generated around 4.6 million replies, of which 84% were in favour of discontinuing the bi-annual clock changes while 16% wanted to keep them.
Against this background, the Commission considers that the arrangements for summer time should be terminated in a coordinated manner in order to avoid any major disruption to the internal market caused by divergences between Member States in this area.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: based on the evidence available on the effects of the EU summer-time arrangements, the conclusion can be drawn that a continued harmonised regime – whereby all Member States abolish the bi-annual time changes – would remain beneficial for the functioning of the internal market.
Effects on other areas are rather inconclusive and are likely to depend on the geographical location and whether Member States choose to stay with permanent summer- or permanent winter-time. The impact of this choice therefore needs to be assessed at national level. A change of system will also bring about transition costs that should be considered.
CONTENT: the Commission proposes to end seasonal changes in European time from 2019 onwards, while leaving the Member States free to decide whether to permanently apply summer time or winter time. Directive 2000/84/EC will be repealed. The proposed directive provides that the last mandatory summer-time period will start on 31 March 2019 at 1.00 a.m.
Member States wishing to return permanently to winter time may make a final change of seasonal time on Sunday 27 October 2019 (at 01.00 in the morning). From this date, seasonal time changes will no longer be possible.
Member States remain free to make changes to their standard time that are not linked to seasonal changes. In order to avoid disturbances Member States should inform the Commission of their intention to change their standard time 6 months before changes take effect.
Given that the Member States will have to apply Directive as from 1 April 2019, the Directive provides that each Member State must, by 27 April 2019 at the latest , on the basis of possible consultations and assessments at national level and in concertation with other Member States, notify the Commission of its intention to permanently apply a standard time corresponding to their current winter-time, rather than to their current summer-time .
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)437
- Reasoned opinion: PE638.493
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0225/2019
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Go to the page
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0169/2019
- Committee opinion: PE631.995
- Committee opinion: PE632.863
- Committee opinion: PE629.635
- Committee opinion: PE630.406
- Committee opinion: PE630.764
- Committee opinion: PE632.025
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.656
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.603
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.580
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.558
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.937
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.043
- Contribution: COM(2018)0639
- Committee draft report: PE632.060
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE629.636
- Reasoned opinion: PE631.791
- Reasoned opinion: PE631.790
- Reasoned opinion: PE629.661
- Contribution: COM(2018)0639
- ESC: CES4580/2018
- Legislative proposal: COM(2018)0639
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2018)0406
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2018)0639
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE629.636
- Committee draft report: PE632.060
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.043
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.937
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.558
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.580
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.603
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.656
- Committee opinion: PE632.025
- Committee opinion: PE630.764
- Committee opinion: PE632.863
- Committee opinion: PE629.635
- Committee opinion: PE630.406
- Committee opinion: PE631.995
- Legislative proposal: COM(2018)0639 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2018)0406
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)437
- Contribution: COM(2018)0639
- Reasoned opinion: PE629.661
- Reasoned opinion: PE631.791
- Reasoned opinion: PE631.790
- Contribution: COM(2018)0639
- Reasoned opinion: PE638.493
- ESC: CES4580/2018
Activities
- Werner LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Daniela AIUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Wim van de CAMP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James CARVER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mark DEMESMAEKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrzej GRZYB
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liisa JAAKONSAARI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alex MAYER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gesine MEISSNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matthijs van MILTENBURG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Momchil NEKOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James NICHOLSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bolesław G. PIECHA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kārlis ŠADURSKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dobromir SOŚNIERZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel SVOBODA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Indrek TARAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0169/2019 - Marita Ulvskog - Proposition de la Commission 26/03/2019 12:37:01.000 #
A8-0169/2019 - Marita Ulvskog - Proposition de la Commission #
Amendments | Dossier |
509 |
2018/0332(COD)
2018/12/17
PETI
41 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, building on the numerous petitions and demands received from the citizens, by the Committee of Petitions, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also confirmed that it is essential to maintain a harmonised and co-ordinated approach to time arrangements throughout the Union.
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Member States that approved the introduction of seasonal time when under dictatorship should alter their legislation.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications, the labour market, health and other concerned sectors, they should conduct consultations on changing standard time in the whole of their national territory and notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) With reference to the online public consultation regarding the EU summertime arrangements organised by the European Commission from 4 July 2018 to 16 August 2018, and the vast amounts of petitions received by the Commission on Petitions in the European Parliament referred to in the previous recital, there is a clear preference for a permanent summertime arrangement. In addition, responses from the business sector and stakeholder groups also reflect this willingness and preference for a permanent summertime arrangement.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Member States should adjust timetables in each territory to the natural time for their geographical location, to establish a use of time that fits each territory geographically and prevent the time differences that exist in some areas of Europe.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Therefore, it is necessary to put an end to the harmonisation of the period covered by summer-time arrangements as laid down in Directive 2000/84/EC and to introduce common rules preventing Member States from applying different seasonal time arrangements by changing their standard time more than once during the year and establishing the obligation to notify envisaged changes of the standard time. . For the smooth functioning of the internal market, it is essential that while the existing time zones are retained, all Member States should apply the same time arrangement, which should be the permanent summer-time, in order to avoid a patchwork of time arrangements within the internal market. This Directive aims at contributing in a determined manner to the smooth functioning of the internal market and should, consequently, be based on Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as interpreted in accordance with the consistent case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 2019, so that the last summer-time period subject to the rules of Directive 2000/84/EC should start, in every Member State, at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 31 March 2019. Member States that, after that summer-time period, intend to adopt a standard time corresponding to the time applied during the winter season in accordance with Directive 2000/84/EC should change their standard time at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019, so that similar and lasting changes occurring in different Member States take place simultaneously. It is desirable that Member States take the decisions on the standard time that each of them will apply as from 2019 in a concerted manner, based on their geographical location and with a view to minimising the difference between solar time and standard time.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 2021
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitored and is subject to the coordination mechanism agreed in advance by Member States under this codecision procedure. The results of this monitoring should be presented by the Commission in a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report should be based on the information that is made available to the Commission by the Member States in a timely fashion to allow for the report to be presented at the specified time.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2021
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. For the purpose of this Directive 'summer-time period' shall mean, the period of the year during which clocks are put forward by sixty minutes compared with the rest of the year. This shall be the new standard time in all Member States.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. As defined in Article 1, the new standard time period shall apply, in every Member State, at 1:00 a.m, Co-ordinated Universal Time, as of the 30 March 2020.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade,
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 2021
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 2021
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3 a) Several studies have shown, that negative consequences exist related to the bi-annual change of time in various areas, such as health issues with effects on the circadian rhythm ; road safety whereas an increase in the accident rate in the days following the change in time has been observed ; and, administrative burdens and additional costs for many sectors within the economy.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 2021
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements, a
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. Others, however, have not had this debate. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a harmonized and well-coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4 a) It is crucial to take into consideration the large north-south extension of the European Union meaning that daylight effects of time vary across the European Union. As such we must consider the geographical aspects of time, while retaining the existing time zones.
source: 629.636
2018/12/19
IMCO
84 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive – The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the draft directive discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive 2000/84/EC (COM (2018) 0639-0408/2018-2018/0332 (COD)).
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive – The Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Member States chose in the past to introduce summer-time arrangements at
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) The harmonised adjustment of seasonal time changes has helped Member States to coordinate the simultaneous changing of clocks twice a year. The seasonal changing of clocks from standard time to summer time has helped to eliminate excessively early summer sunrises in eastern Member States and excessively late winter sunrises in western Member States, while the harmonisation of the seasonal changing of clocks has had a positive impact on the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) In parallel to, and independently from the Union summertime arrangements, the territories of the Member States on the European continent are grouped into three different time zones or standard times. The decision on the standard time is as such not affected by the Union summertime rules, or any change thereof.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Since 2016, the Commission has been promising to deliver a suitable comprehensive analysis, having confirmed at the plenary session of the European Parliament on 27 October 2016 that work on this analysis had already begun. In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also confirmed that it is essential to maintain a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union, and noted that numerous scientific studies have indicated the existence of negative effects to human health.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3)
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the negative impacts and inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3 a) Numerous studies, however, suggest that the benefits of seasonal time change, such as energy savings, have been overestimated, while the negative impacts, for example, on human biorhythm and health, have been underestimated.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, and given the horizontal effects of discontinuing seasonal time change it is necessary to
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements, a
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated and harmonised way to summer-time arrangements and to agree upon a common standard time.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4 a) Territories of the Member States on the European continent are grouped over three different time zones or standard times. These are Greenwich Mean time (GMT), Central European Time (GMT+1) and Eastern European Time (GMT+2). Member States should consult citizens and stakeholders before changing their time zone.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4 b) For the purpose of ensuring a harmonised implementation of this Directive, Member States should make efforts to avoid illogical time zones and unnecessary disruptions to the internal market. Member States should consult each other and coordinate envisioned time zone changes. Member States should indicate to the Commission a contact point for this purpose. At the request of the Member States, the Commission should facilitate the coordination.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors,
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Therefore, it is necessary to put an end to the harmonisation of the period covered by summer-time arrangements as laid down in Directive 2000/84/EC and to introduce common rules preventing Member States from applying different seasonal time arrangements
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Therefore, it is necessary to put an end to the harmonisation of the period covered by summer-time arrangements as laid down in Directive 2000/84/EC and to introduce
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Therefore, it is necessary to
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6 a) The coordination of Member States' choice of their standard time or times after the repeal of Directive 2000/84/EC could eliminate negative impacts on the functioning of the internal market, but the decision on standard time must be left to the individual Member States or to their mutual agreement. The Commission should make its personnel and administrative resources available in order to ensure coordination and dialogue between the Member States concerning the future time arrangements.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 b (new) (6 b) The implementation of this Directive leaves Member States adequate time to prepare national analyses concerning the effects of amending the Directive, national public consultations and public dialogue on the proposed amendment.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) It is important to avoid that Member States opt for different standard times. It is therefore necessary to leave them sufficient time to adopt a harmonised and well-coordinated approach. This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) In order to avoid a high risk of fragmentation of the internal market in case Member States do not manage to coordinate their approach, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of postponing the date of application of this directive. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making*. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Member States should coordinate among themselves the standard times for which they opt, in order to avoid excessively different time zones in the EU, so as to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and make it predictable for the sectors, citizens and consumers concerned.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Provided that an assessment of the preparedness of the internal market is carried out by the Commission giving sufficient evidence that any significant disruptions of the internal market will be avoided, this Directive should apply from 29March 2020, so that all Member States maintain permanent standard time, or all Member States change to permanent summer time period subject to the Rules of Directive 2000/84/EC, on 28 March 2020.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least 6 months before the change takes effect.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall ensure a coordinated approach with other Member States to guarantee the proper functioning of the internal market. It shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission and all other Member States at least
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. If, following the assessment referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission can demonstrate that the planned change of standard time or times will have a negative impact on the functioning of the internal market, it shall inform the Member State in question. That Member State shall then decide whether to repeal its decision to change its standard time or times or to explain how it will counter the negative impact of the change.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. If, following the assessment referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission cannot demonstrate that the planned change of standard time or times will have a negative impact on the functioning of the internal market, or two months after the Member State provides the Commission with the explanations referred to in paragraph 2a, the Member State may apply this change. The Commission shall publish that information in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 4a to postpone the application date referred to in subparagraph 2 if it considers that there is a high risk of fragmentation within the internal market due to a lack of coordination between the Member States
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 a (new) Article 4 a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 4 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from … [date of entry into force of the directive]. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 4 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to thedelegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 4 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of [two months] of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by [two months] at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
source: 632.043
2019/01/21
AGRI
47 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a directive – The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission's draft directive discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive2000/84/EC.
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. During the discussions held, specialists from various fields, including human and veterinary medicine, agriculture, education and tourism, assessed the adverse effects of the yearly changing of the clocks. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements thanks to the active participation of national action groups in many Member States, and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements, while grouping the Member States into the following three time zones: GMT+1, GMT+2 and GMT+3.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4 a) In order to ensure a harmonised implementation of this Directive, Member States shall consult each other and coordinate any time zone changes in order to avoid illogical time zones and burdensome disruptions to the internal market.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should make a joint choice between standard time and summer time at EU level and Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications, the agricultural sector and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a directive – The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Developement calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 2021
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8)
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitored. The results of this monitoring should be presented by the Commission in a preliminary report to the European Parliament and to the Council within one year of its entry into force, and a final report at the latest three years from its implementation. That report should be based on the information that is made available to the Commission by the Member States in a timely fashion to allow for the report to be presented at the specified time.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) To ensure smooth trade relations, the governments of the Member States may also hold consultations with countries which are not members of the EU, but which belong to the EEA, with countries that are candidates or potential candidates for accession, or with other third countries neighbouring an EU Member State;
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall not apply seasonal changes to their standard time or times. They shall jointly choose either permanent standard time or permanent summer time throughout the EU.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2019 and 2020, provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC together with the Member States and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also confirmed that it is essential to maintain a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission and the other Member States at least
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. For the purpose of ensuring a harmonised implementation of this Directive, a coordination of then ew time arrangements shall be undertaken by the means of grouping the Member states in line with the three time zones: GMT 0, GMT+1, GMT +2,.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall present a preliminary report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 20
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 2021
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 2021
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, create legal certainty and long-term dependability and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services and effects on agricultural productivity. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) In this context, the situation of the agricultural community, especially livestock farmers, can serve as an example. The bi-annual transition to summer-time may make it harder to find market outlets for produce or animals. It is necessary also to take into account the fact that animals do not have their milking schedule changed without consequences, and that yields are reduced at changeover times. Farmers themselves, depending on the natural cycles of the animals on their farms, have their working conditions changed.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A
source: 632.937
2019/01/28
ENVI
77 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive – The Committee on [Environment Public Health and Food Safety] calls on the Committee on [Transport and Tourism], as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the [Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive 2000/84/EC].
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Studies have shown that the half- yearly clock change has a negative impact on human and animal health.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 b (new) (1b) The energy for lighting saved by switching to summer time – the initial goal – is more than outweighed by increased consumption of energy for heating and the fact the main heating period has been brought forward.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2a) Whereas, in 18 years, no serious assessment has been carried out by the Commission - despite numerous warnings – of the harmful effects of the half-yearly clock changes.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence in those areas is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) However, there is clear evidence about the adverse impact on human health due to the change of the biorhythm as a result of seasonal changes of time. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end to seasonal changes of time.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Whereas most of the objective work carried out on this matter points towards the same conclusion: namely, that summer time is harmful for the health of humans, animals and probably also plants.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The existence of different time zones would have a dramatic impact on work and family life, especially in border regions with many daily commuters.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. The parliaments of some Member States are calling on their governments to take action on seasonal changes of time in the EU. National legislative initiatives have been launched to abolish seasonal changes of time – for example, a bill in Poland resulting from the ‘#czasowstrzymywacz’ social campaign and supported by all political parties in the Sejm – whose procedures and implementation are being held back by arrangements at EU level. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements, a
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. However, the stated level of public support is questionable: seventy percent of participants in the public consultation were from one Member State. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements thanks to the active participation of national action groups in many Member States and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States, including a significant portion of the public, have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Territories other than overseas territories of the Member States are grouped over three different time zones or standard times, i.e. GMT, GMT +1 and GMT +2. The large north-south extension of the European Union means that daylight effects of time vary across the Union. It is therefore important that Member States take into consideration the geographical aspects of time, i.e. natural time zones and geographical position, before changing their time zones. Member States should consult citizens and relevant stakeholders before deciding to change their time zones.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Whereas many studies show that summer time has a harmful effect on human, animal and plant organisms; and in particular that our internal clocks run on a daily cycle of 24 hours and 12 minutes, rather than 24 hours. This difference means that all human beings have to re-adjust every day. This is much more difficult to do with summertime.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Recent research shows that seasonal changes of time pose health risks for certain groups, such as children and older people, and that there is also a link between changes of time and cardiovascular diseases linked to the disturbance of the circadian cycle by changes of time.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) Whereas the latest studies on plant electrophysiology suggest that there should be the maximum number of hours of sunlight, and that this should occur during first hours of the day.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) Seasonal changes of time also have an adverse impact on the welfare of animals, which is evident in agriculture, for example, where cows’ milk production suffers.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 c (new) (4c) Whereas polls indicate that 76% of respondents are in favour of summer time. It should be noted that most of them are urban, service sector workers, and their answers are only concerned with leisure activities.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the functioning of the internal market is not thereby disrupted, Member States should agree on a possible change in standard time in consultation with the other Member States and, where possible, adopt a harmonised approach. In order to prevent the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should make a joint choice between standard time and summer time at EU level and Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not under any circumstances prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer- time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the existing right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) For the purpose of ensuring a harmonised implementation of this Directive, Member States should coordinate in advance their decision on the envisaged standard times via the establishment of a coordination mechanism in order to avoid that Member States opt for different standard times within a time zone. The coordination mechanism should consist of one designated representative of each Member State and one representative of the Commission. The Commission should facilitate the coordination and should provide assessment on the effects that the notified decision would have on the proper functioning of the internal market. The decision to apply or not the envisaged time change remains within the competence of the Member States after having consulted with the Commission and other Member States.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) It is important to note that there are also ways to regulate the circadian rhythm in the Member States, in addition to defining time zones, such as: the working hours of public institutions, labour law, custom. Even today, in Member States located in the same time zone there are differences in working hours, including in public institutions and businesses. Such solutions can be an effective instrument for meeting social expectations while preserving the harmonisation of time zones in the EU at least at the current level in the implementation of this Directive.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive sh
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Member States should coordinate among themselves the standard times for which they opt, which should be as fully harmonised between Member States as possible in order to avoid excessively different time zones in the EU, so as to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and make it predictable for the citizens, consumers and sectors concerned.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) While it is legally not possible to oblige member states to decide for a dedicated time zone, all efforts must be done to avoid unnecessary complications. Therefore, Commission and member states should be in permanent dialogue about the respective choice.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Implementation of this Directive should be
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) It is generally preferable to maximise available daylight to coincide with people's waking hours. If one considers 12pm as midday, this would suggest a general waking pattern of 4am to 8pm. The vast majority of people do not keep those waking hours. Having a solar noon later than 12pm more accurately fits people's waking hours. For example having a 1pm solar noon suggest waking hours of 5am to 9pm and a 2pm solar noon suggest waking hours of 6am to 10pm.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 b (new) (10b) Summer time, or daylight saving, has enabled later apparent sunsets during the summer months. In the minds of many EU citizens summer is synonymous with sunlight being available late into the evening. A reversion to "standard" time would result in summer sunsets being an hour earlier, with a much-reduced period of the year where late evening daylight is available.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 c (new) (10c) With summer time, or daylight saving, the period of the year in which there is usable daylight after the end of most working days is much longer. For example, in Prague the period in which the sun sets after 7pm in 2019 is currently 31st March until 23rd September; nearly six months. Without summer time (i.e. with permanent standard time) that period would run from 18th April until 25th August a little over four months. The latest sunset would be 8:16pm rather than 9:16pm. This would have a significant effect in limiting evening leisure activities dependent on daylight.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 d (new) (10d) Summer time produces later sunrises and later sunsets. Standard time produces earlier sunrises and sunsets. The former benefits later-risers and the later early-risers. The biannual switch allows for the extremities of the seasons to be ironed out and to allow for the maximum number of people to have their preference honoured.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 e (new) (10e) The effects of time changes on personal health may be overstated, but if they are true then they are alarming for the many millions of EU citizens who regularly travel across time zones for work or for holiday.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall not apply seasonal changes to their standard time or times. They shall jointly choose either permanent standard time or permanent summer time throughout the EU.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. Member States
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2019, provided that they take into account the impact on the health and well-being of the population and on the economy and provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019. The Member States shall notify this decision in accordance with Article 2.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2019, in consultation with the other Member States, provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019. In doing so, the Member States shall adopt a harmonised approach. The Member States shall notify this decision in accordance with
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, Member States shall remain free to decide whether or not to make the seasonal time change; if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least 6 months before the change takes effect. Where a Member State has made such a notification and has not
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State – after consulting all the other Member States in the same time zone – decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least 6 months before the change takes effect. Where a Member State has made such a notification and has not withdrawn it at least 6 months before the date of the envisaged change, the Member State shall apply this change.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission and all other Member States at least
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall be called upon to notify the Commission at least 6 months before the change takes effect. Where a Member State has made such a notification and has not withdrawn it at least 6 months before the date of the envisaged change, the Member State shall apply this change.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new) Article 2a 1. This Directive sets up a coordination mechanism with the aim to ensure a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union and to strengthen the cooperation between the Member States and the Commission in assessing the impact on the functioning of the internal market of any decision to change standard time or times. 2. The coordination mechanism referred to in paragraph 1 shall consist of one representative for each Member State and one representative of the Commission. 3. The coordination mechanism shall be convened by the Commission no later than 24 April 2020 in case any notification is received pursuant to Article 1(2). 4. The coordination mechanism shall assess the potential impact of the envisaged change on the functioning of the internal market. 5. Where on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 4, the Commission considers that the envisaged change will significantly affect the proper functioning of the internal market, it shall inform the notifying Member State thereof. 6. No later than 26 June 2020, the notifying Member State referred to in paragraph 5 shall decide whether to maintain its intention or not. Where the notifying Member State decides to maintain its intention, it shall provide a detailed explanation how it will counter the negative impact of the change on the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive, with a particular focus on analysing the impact on EU policy, including the single market, and on efforts to protect public health, by 31 December 2024 at the latest.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, without delay and by 1 April 2019 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 1 (new) (1) If necessary, the Commission should then undertake to ensure that discrepancies do not arise which would prejudice the smooth running of the internal market. The Commission should therefore delay the repealing of the Directive until such time as these discrepancies have been solved.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 2019, i.e. when the final transition to summertime comes into effect in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2000/84/EC.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Given the potential disruption to the workings of the internal market that could arise from member states adopting a patchwork of summer/standard time arrangements the Commission should collect all of the preferences from member states and evaluate where problems might arise.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 2019, i.e. when the Member States make the final transition to summertime.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1
source: 634.558
2019/01/29
TRAN
77 amendments...
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also confirmed that it is essential to maintain a harmonised and co- ordinated approach to time arrangements throughout the Union.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct a
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade,
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services and adverse effects on health. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia,
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport – in particular, aviation – operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time.
Amendment 29 #
(3a) Recent Nobel prize winning research by Jeffrey C. Hall, Michael Rosbash and Michael W. Young of 2017, shows that the human body possesses a delicate biological clock, called the circadian rhythm, which is influenced by exposure to amounts of daylight. While evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time, sufficient literature exists on the potential negative effects of summer-time change on our health and that of agricultural livestock, by disrupting the circadian rhythm. This has a number of health related risks ranging from inflammatory immune diseases, attention deficit and cardiovascular complications.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Furthermore, there is clear evidence about the adverse impact on human health due to the change of the biorhythm as a result of seasonal changes of time, for example higher risks of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end to seasonal changes of time.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. The parliaments of some Member States are calling on their governments to take action on seasonal changes of time in the EU. National legislative initiatives have been launched to abolish seasonal changes of time – for example, a bill in Poland resulting from the ‘#czasowstrzymywacz’ social campaign and supported by all political parties in the Sejm – whose procedures and implementation are being held back by arrangements at EU level. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements. Close to 4.6 million citizens participated in the Commission’s public consultation, the highest number of responses ever received in a Commission consultation, thus highlighting the level of public concern as regards the biannual change of time and some Member States have already
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements. The vast majority of the 4.6 million citizens who took part in the Commission's Public Consultation voted in favour of ending the half-yearly changes of time and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market as well as cross-border transport and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated and harmonised way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Territories other than overseas territories of the Member States are grouped over three different time zones or standard times, i.e. GMT, GMT +1 and GMT +2. The large north-south extension of the European Union means that daylight effects of time vary across the Union. It is therefore important that Member States take into consideration the geographical aspects of time, i.e. natural time zones and geographical position, before changing their time zones. Member States should consult citizens and relevant stakeholders before deciding to change their time zones.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The European Commission organised an online consultation between 4 July 2018 - 16 August 2018, in which around 4.6 million citizens participated. Despite the fact that this is the highest number of responses ever received, it only represents around 1 % of the total population of the EU, while in several Member States only 0,2% of the population responded.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Recent scientific evidence suggest that there is a link between the bi-annual clockchange and negative health issues, such as cardiovascular diseases, linked to chronobiology through the internal chrono disruption taking place with the time change.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) In this respect and in order to assess all the aspects of the discontinuation of seasonal time changes and to facilitate the coordination between Member States the Commission should prepare an impact assessment or study involving experts from all Member States.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the existing right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, and aviation in particular, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) For the purpose of ensuring a harmonised implementation of this Directive, Member States should coordinate in advance their decision on the envisaged standard times via the establishment of a coordination mechanism, in order to avoid that Member States opt for different standard times within a time zone. The coordination mechanism should consist of one designated representative of each Member State and one representative of the Commission. The Commission should facilitate the coordination and should provide assessment on the effects that the notified decision would have on the proper functioning of the internal market. The decision to apply the envisaged time change or not remains within the competence of the Member States after having consulted with the Commission and other Member States.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) It is important to note that there are also ways to regulate the circadian rhythm in the Member States, in addition to defining time zones, such as: the working hours of public institutions, labour law, custom. Even today, in Member States located in the same time zone there are differences in working hours, including in public institutions and businesses. Such solutions can be an effective instrument for meeting social expectations while preserving the harmonisation of time zones in the EU at least at the current level in the implementation of this Directive.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Therefore, it is necessary to put an end to the harmonisation of the period covered by summer-time arrangements as laid down in Directive 2000/84/EC and to introduce common rules preventing Member States from applying different seasonal time arrangements by
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The Commission should order an expert analysis including a recommendation on whether permanent summer-time or permanent winter-time would be most beneficial, taking into account nature, health and social aspects as well as geographical differences among Member States.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive sh
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply without delay, that is from 1 April 2019, so that the last summer-time period subject to the rules of Directive 2000/84/EC should start, in every Member State, at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 31 March 2019. Member States that, after that summer-time period, intend to adopt a standard time corresponding to the time applied during the winter season in accordance with Directive 2000/84/EC should change their standard time at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019, so that similar and lasting changes occurring in different Member States take place simultaneously.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Implementation of this Directive should be
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitored. The results of this monitoring, including a comprehensive evaluation of its impact, inter alia, on the various modes of transport in Europe, should be presented by the Commission in a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report should be based on the information that is
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitored two years after entry into force. The results of this monitoring should be presented by the Commission in a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report should be based on the information that is made available to the Commission by the Member States in a timely fashion to allow for the report to be presented at the specified time.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2021
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2019, provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 20
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission and all other Member states at least
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify all other Member States and the Commission at least
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Each Member State shall designate the relevant national authority for the tasks set in this directive. The Commission shall establish a list of the relevant national authorities and communicate it to all Member States.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new) Article 2 a 1. This Directive sets up a coordination mechanism with the aim to ensure a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union and to strengthen the cooperation between the Member States and the Commission in assessing the impact on the functioning of the internal market of any decision to change standard time or times. 2. The coordination mechanism referred to in paragraph 1 shall consist of one representative for each Member State and one representative of the Commission. 3. The coordination mechanism shall be convened by the Commission no later than 24 April 2020 in case any notification is received pursuant to Article 1(2). 4. The coordination mechanism shall assess the potential impact of the envisaged change on the functioning of the internal market. 5. Where on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 4, the Commission considers that the envisaged change will significantly affect the proper functioning of the internal market, it shall inform the notifying Member State thereof. 6. No later than 26 June 2020, the notifying Member State referred to in paragraph 5 shall decide whether to maintain its intention or not. Where the notifying Member State decides to maintain its intention, it shall provide a detailed explanation how it will counter the negative impact of the change on the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, without delay and by 1 April 2019 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 2019, i.e. when the Member States make the final transition to summertime.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from
source: 634.580
2019/01/30
ITRE
105 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 102 #
They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 2021
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 2021
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive – The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive 2000/84/EC.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive – The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal on discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive2000/84/EC.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Title 1 Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Title 1 Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 3 a (new) Having regard to the reasoned opinions of the national parliaments,
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also confirmed that it is essential to maintain a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union. However, no Union government has called for a change to the current provisions.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct a
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, create predictability and long-term certainty and
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The public debate on summer-time arrangements is not new and since the introduction of the summer-time several initiatives were meant to discontinue the practice. Some Member States held national consultations and a majority of businesses and stakeholders have supported a discontinuation of the practice. The consultation initiated by the European Commission has led to the same conclusion.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements, a
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements, and
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market as well as cross-border transport and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated and harmonised way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In order to avoid negative consequences for functioning of the internal market as well as difficulties in cross-border activities for the EU citizens it is essential to ensure a continuation of a geographic logic in distribution of time zones in the Union. Therefore, ending summer-time arrangements should be preceded by a coordination process concluded by the Member States. The process, while respecting a sovereign right of every Member State to decide on its standard time and taking into account different needs of populations in the Member States, which currently span three time zones, will help Member States, in particular neighbouring countries, to achieve in a consensual manner a common position on the standard time that each Member State will choose to apply in future.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market and ensure a coordinated approach, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market and ensure a coordinated approach, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should take their decisions in the context of the coordination mechanism and refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone, especially if such a change would affect the geographical coherence of the time zones present in Europe. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they sh
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. However, if a Member State decides to a change of a time zone, it should not vary more than an hour from the neighbouring Member States. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission and the other Member States in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to the internal market, the energy sector, transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission and all other Member States in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However,
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) For the purpose of safeguarding the internal market and ensuring the benefits of being European Union citizens, a harmonised implementation of this Directive and a coordinated and cooperative approach should be a the primary goal of the Member States. To that regard they should coordinate in advance their decision on the envisaged standard times via the establishment of a coordination mechanism in order to avoid that Member States opt for different standard times within a time zone.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The decision on which standard time to apply in each Member State requires being preceded by consultations and studies which would take into account citizens’ preferences, geographical variations, regional differences, standard working arrangements and other factors relevant for the particular Member State. Therefore, Member States should have sufficient time to analyse the impact of the proposal and to choose the solution best serving its populations, while taking into account the well-functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 44 #
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) It is important to avoid possible complications that could occur when Member States are implementing this directive. It is therefore necessary to leave them sufficient time and ensure a harmonized and well-coordinated approach. This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 2021
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to strengthen the cooperation and coordination between Member States and to facilitate that Member States take decisions on their standard time in a concerted and coordinate manner, a network of national contact points on time arrangement should be set up.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitored. The Commission shall collect and analyse the impact assessments conducted by the Member States. The results of this monitoring should be presented by the Commission in a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report should be based on the information that is made available to the Commission by the Member States in a timely fashion to allow for the report to be presented at the specified time.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2019, provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 20
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2021
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least 6 months before the change takes effect.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission and all other Member States at least
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. If, following the assessment referred to in paragraph 2, the Impact assessment demonstrate that the planned change of standard time or times will have a negative impact, it shall inform the Member State in question. That Member State shall then decide if it will redraw its notification to change its standard time or times or explain how it will counter the negative impact of the change.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. If, following the assessment referred to in paragraph 2, the Impact assessment do not demonstrate that the planned change of standard time or times will have a negative impact or the Member State concerned has provided to the Commission within two months after the publication of the Impact assessment with the explanations referred to in paragraph 2a, the Member State may apply this change. The Commission shall publish that information in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish,
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 31
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
source: 634.603
2019/02/05
JURI
78 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 4 a (new) Having regard to the results of the online consultation conducted by the European Commission between 4 July 2018 - 16 August 2018
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Member States chose in the past to introduce summer-time arrangements at national level, especially to save coal and make the most of the daylight available within a certain time period. It was, therefore, important for the functioning of the internal market that standardised arrangements establishing a common date and time for the beginning and end of the summer-time period be fixed throughout the Union. In accordance with Directive 2000/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council21, all Member States currently apply summer-time arrangements from the last Sunday in March until the last Sunday in October of the same year. _________________ 21 Directive 2000/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on summer- time arrangements (OJ L 31, 2.2.2001, p. 21).
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence is
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, the risk of fragmentation, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3)
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time. The Commission's proposal highlights the importance of EU-level harmonization for the smooth functioning of the internal market. Though this proposal is not sufficiently justified, as it does not sufficiently identify the problems created by existing legislation. Furthermore, it is still not known what the exact economic costs and the total impact of this change would be across Europe, as there is no impact assessment study and cost / benefit analysis conducted by the Commission.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. Furthermore, the public consultation exercise conducted by the Commission in 2018 revealed that 84% of the 4.6 million people who took part would like to discontinue biannual clock changes. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to abide by the will of the peoples of Europe and to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements, a
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated and harmonised way to summer-time arrangements and to agree upon a common standard time.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, in order to maintain a uniform approach, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The European Commission organised an online consultation between 4 July 2018 - 16 August 2018, in which around 4.6 million citizens participated. Despite the fact that this is the highest number of responses ever received, it only represents around 1% of the total population of the EU, while in several Member States only 0.2% of the population responded.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) In order to assess all the aspects of the discontinuation of seasonal time changes and to facilitate the coordination between Member States the Commission should prepare an impact assessment or study involving experts from all Member States.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 c (new) (4c) Recent research shows that seasonal changes of time pose health risks for certain groups, such as children and older people, and that there is also a link between changes of time and cardiovascular diseases linked to the disturbance of the circadian cycle by changes of time.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 d (new) (4d) Recent scientific evidence suggest a link between the bi-annual clock change and negative health issues, such as cardiovascular diseases, linked to chronobiology through the internal chronodisruption.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5)
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by only some Member States
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto, with reference to the legal basis of the proposal and the subsidiarity principle. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However,
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) For the purpose of ensuring a harmonised implementation of this directive, Member States should coordinate in advance their decision on the envisaged standard times via the establishment of a coordination mechanism, in order to avoid that Member States opt for different standard times within a time zone. The coordination mechanism should consist of one designated representative of each Member State and one representative of the Commission. The Commission should facilitate the coordination and should provide assessment on the effects that the notified decision would have on the proper functioning of the internal market. The decision to apply the envisaged time change or not remains within the competence of the Member States after having consulted with the Commission and other Member States.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Therefore, it is necessary to put an end to the harmonisation of the period covered by summer-time arrangements as laid down in Directive 2000/84/EC and to introduce common rules preventing Member States from applying different seasonal time arrangements
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) A time change unrelated to seasonal shifts will lead to transition costs, especially with regard to IT systems in transport and other sectors. In order to reduce significantly the costs of transition, a reasonable preparation period is needed for implementation of this Directive.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 b (new) (6b) The Commission should order an expert analysis including a recommendation on whether permanent summer-time or permanent winter-time would be most beneficial, taking into account nature, health and social aspects as well as geographical differences among Member States.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 2021
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 20
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) This Directive should apply from
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Member States should coordinate among themselves the standard times for which they opt, which should be as fully harmonised between Member States as possible in order to avoid excessively different time zones in the EU, so as to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and make it predictable for the citizens, consumers and sectors concerned.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitored. The results of this monitoring should be presented by the Commission in a sufficiently substantiated report to the European
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. Member States
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2021
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article premier – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 20
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify all other Member States and the Commission at least
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission and all other Member States at least
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Each Member State shall designate the relevant national authority for the tasks set in this directive. The Commission shall establish a list of the relevant national authorities and communicate it to all Member States.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new) Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 202
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission shall conduct a comprehensive impact assessment and a cost / benefit analysis regarding the discontinuing seasonal changes of time in the EU.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 202
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 2021
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 20
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 2021
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive – The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 20
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 They shall apply those provisions from
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 2021
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 20
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 source: 634.656
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and DemocratsNew
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats |
committees/2 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
European Conservatives and ReformistsNew
European Conservatives and Reformists Group |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
European People's Party (Christian Democrats)New
Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group) |
committees/5/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Greens/European Free AllianceNew
Verts/ALE |
committees/6/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for EuropeNew
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
European People's Party (Christian Democrats)New
Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group) |
committees/8/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for EuropeNew
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe |
council/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3658*&MEET_DATE=03/12/2018New
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/calendar/?Category=meeting&Page=1&daterange=&dateFrom=2018-12-03&dateTo=2018-12-03 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/18 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/20 |
|
docs/22 |
|
docs/23 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/summary/11 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/4/docs/0/title |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Go to the page |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/summary/13 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32372&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=32372 |
events/8 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
TRAN/8/14576 |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 2000/84/EC
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 2000/84/EC 2000/0140(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/2 |
2000/0140(COD)
|
procedure/legal_basis |
Old
New
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 114-p1 |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2019-437-TA-8-2019-0225_en.docx |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2018-10-28T00:00:00New
2018-10-29T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2018-12-18T00:00:00New
2018-12-19T00:00:00 |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=en
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32372&j=0&l=en
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0639New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0639 |
docs/16/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0639New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0639 |
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)630308New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)630308 |
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/date |
Old
2018-10-29T00:00:00New
2018-10-28T00:00:00 |
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16/date |
Old
2018-12-19T00:00:00New
2018-12-18T00:00:00 |
docs/17 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-632060_EN.html
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-634580_EN.html
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-632025_EN.html
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-630764_EN.html
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PETI-AD-629635_EN.html
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-630406_EN.html
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-632863_EN.html
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-631995_EN.html
|
events/1/body |
EP
|
events/2/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
events/6/body |
EP
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.060
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.580
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.025&secondRef=02
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.764
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.635
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.406&secondRef=02
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.863&secondRef=02
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.995&secondRef=03
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.764&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.764 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.635&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.635 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
124809
|
committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref |
124862
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4580)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
|
docs/16/date |
Old
2019-01-04T00:00:00New
2018-12-19T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.025&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.025&secondRef=02 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.764&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.764&secondRef=02 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.635&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.635&secondRef=02 |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.406&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.406&secondRef=02 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.863&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.863&secondRef=02 |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.995&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.995&secondRef=03 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.060New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.060 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.580New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.580 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.025&secondRef=02New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.025&secondRef=02 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.764&secondRef=02New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.764&secondRef=02 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.635&secondRef=02New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE629.635&secondRef=02 |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.406&secondRef=02New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.406&secondRef=02 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.863&secondRef=02New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.863&secondRef=02 |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.995&secondRef=03New
http://httsp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.995&secondRef=03 |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0169_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0169_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190325&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190325&type=CRE |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0225_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0225_EN.html |
events/8/body |
EP
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
events/8 |
|
docs/14/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0169&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0169_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0225New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0225_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/parlements_nationaux/com/2018/0639/UK_HOUSE-OF-LORDS_AVIS-COM(2018)0639_EN.pdf
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/parlements_nationaux/com/2018/0639/UK_HOUSE-OF-LORDS_AVIS-COM(2018)0639_EN.pdf
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links/Research document |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/8/14576New
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/6/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/6/shadows/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/6/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/6/shadows/6 |
|
committees/6/shadows/2 |
|
committees/6/shadows/3 |
|
committees/6/shadows/5 |
|
committees/6/shadows/6 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2018-10-10T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/6/date |
2018-10-25T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/6/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2018-10-10T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/6/date |
2018-10-25T00:00:00
|
committees/6/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2018-10-22T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2018-10-25T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/6/shadows |
|
committees/1/date |
2018-10-22T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/date |
2018-10-25T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/6/shadows |
|
activities/1/committees/5/date |
2018-09-24T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/5/rapporteur |
|
committees/5/date |
2018-09-24T00:00:00
|
committees/5/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2018-10-09T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2018-10-09T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/4/date |
2018-09-24T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/date |
2018-09-24T00:00:00
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52018PC0639:EN
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|