BETA


2018/2010(INI) Implementation of the trade agreement between the EU and Colombia and Peru

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA FISAS AYXELÀ Santiago (icon: PPE PPE) RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO Inma (icon: S&D S&D), ZAHRADIL Jan (icon: ECR ECR), HIRSCH Nadja (icon: ALDE ALDE), HAUTALA Heidi (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BEGHIN Tiziana (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion ENVI MÉLIN Joëlle (icon: ENF ENF)
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2019/05/28
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2019/01/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/01/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 472 votes to 80 with 74 abstentions a resolution on the implementation of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and Colombia and Peru.

Parliament emphasised that the strategic values of the Agreement extend beyond the sphere of trade as it provides a solid foundation for a deeper relationship, with a long-term commitment to human rights, social rights, the rights of indigenous peoples and peasant farmers, and of the environment.

Diversification

Parliament pointed out that the Agreement has contributed to the modernisation and diversification of exports from Colombia and Peru and that it has had a positive impact on Colombian and Peruvian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). However, it observed that figures relating to volumes and job creation are very low , and recalled that similar progress took place in previous periods. The Commission was asked to include the situation of the local industries and economic diversification in its future analysis. Members felt that more needs to be done in terms of diversification of exports away from traditional mineral, oil and agricultural products, which account for up to 70 % of exports by volume, and towards the export of processed goods and products with greater added value , to support economic development and job creation.

Progress

Members welcomed the fact that the agreement:

- opens markets for, inter alia, goods, services, government procurement and investment, which when built upon the principles of sustainable development can create opportunities for formal and quality employment;

- has increased the Union's investment stocks in Colombia and Peru, the Union being the biggest foreign investor in both countries;

-supports service sector companies by promoting good regulatory practice and improving domestic regulation and legal certainty;

- has led to a significant increase in EU agricultural exports to both countries since its provisional application. The Commission is invited to closely monitor the effects of the agreement on food production for the local market and to keep the European Parliament informed on this matter;

- has made progress in resolving trade disputes and implementing the provisions regarding sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) matters, rules of origin and technical barriers to trade.

Members called on all parties to increase the rate of implementation of the agreement and to raise awareness of it.

Prospects

Parliament stressed that further progress is needed, particularly in the following areas:

- certification requirements for meat and dairy products,

- counterfeiting, piracy, usurpation of EU geographical indication (GI) names and pending Geographical Indication registration,

- discriminatory taxes applied to imported spirits;

- effective implementation of commitments on social and environmental matters,

- lack of transparency in administrative procedures.

Members also believed that the parties should make use of the revision clause of the Agreement to include, among others: (i) a comprehensive chapter on microenterprises and SMEs; (ii) a dedicated chapter on gender; (iii) a chapter on the fight against corruption, money laundering and tax evasion; (iv) a suitable dispute settlement mechanism for the trade and sustainable development (TSD) chapter including, among various enforcement methods, the possibility of considering sanctions as a deterrent measure to be used, as last resort, in the case of serious and persistent breaches.

Parliament noted that both countries have raised specific concerns about their ability to meet certain food safety standards required for the EU market , in particular as regards recent EU legislative proposals on cadmium levels in cacao, endocrine disruptors, novel foods and palm oil. This risks having a social impact in some of the countries’ most vulnerable areas, where production of the affected products tends to be concentrated. The Commission was asked to consider accompanying and supporting measures to help local producers meet EU health requirements, in line with the precautionary principle. All parties should strengthen financial and technical cooperation and enhance early warning mechanisms.

Parliament went on to stress the need to implement specific provisions related to the roadmap for human, labour and environmental rights . It welcomed Peru's efforts to strengthen the implementation of its commitments under the trade and sustainable development chapter of the agreement, but called for further efforts to tackle violence against human rights defenders and leaders of social communities, in particular violence against women.

Members strongly support the peace agreement in Colombia and reiterated the potential benefits and the need to make the best use of the agreement to contribute to its implementation.

Documents
2019/01/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/01/15
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/12/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted an own-initiative report by Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ (EPP, ES) on the implementation of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and Colombia and Peru.

The report emphasised that the strategic values of the Agreement extend beyond the sphere of trade as it provides a solid foundation for a deeper relationship, with a long-term commitment to human rights, social rights, the rights of indigenous peoples and peasant farmers, and of the environment.

It underlined the opportunity that the Agreement offers to reinforce not only interregional, but also intraregional cooperation and trade between Colombia, Peru and Ecuador.

Progress made : Members welcomed the fact that the agreement:

opens markets for, inter alia, goods, services, government procurement and investment, which when built upon the principles of sustainable development can create opportunities for formal and quality employment, and improved working conditions and living standards by liberalising and expanding trade and investment; has increased the Union's investment stocks in Colombia and Peru, the Union being the biggest foreign investor in both countries; supports service sector companies by promoting good regulatory practice and improving domestic regulation and transparency as well as legal certainty; has contributed to the modernisation and diversification of Colombian and Peruvian exports and has had a positive impact on Colombian and Peruvian SMEs (1 155 Colombian companies – of which 328 SMEs - and 2 328 new Peruvian companies – of which 90% SMEs - have started exporting to the Union). Further efforts would be required to diversify exports, which traditionally involve mineral, petroleum and agricultural products, which constitute 70% of the volume of exports; has led to a significant increase in EU agricultural exports to both countries since its provisional application. The Commission is invited to closely monitor the effects of the agreement on food production for the local market and to keep the European Parliament informed on this matter; has made progress in resolving trade disputes and implementing the provisions of the Agreement, in particular as regards sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) matters, rules of origin and technical barriers to trade.

Members called on all parties to increase the rate of implementation of the agreement and to raise awareness of it.

Prospects : the report stressed that further progress is needed, particularly in the following areas:

certification requirements for meat and dairy products, counterfeiting, piracy, usurpation of EU geographical indication (GI) names and pending Geographical Indication registration, discriminatory taxes applied to imported spirits; effective implementation of commitments on social and environmental matters, lack of transparency in administrative procedures.

Members also believe that the parties should make use of the revision clause of the Agreement to include, among others: (i) a comprehensive chapter on microenterprises and SMEs; (ii) a dedicated chapter on gender; (iii) a chapter on the fight against corruption, money laundering and tax evasion; (iv) a suitable dispute settlement mechanism for the trade and sustainable development.

The Commission is invited to use the agreement to monitor domestic reforms in the partner countries in relation to the rule of law and good governance and to come up with effective anti-corruption measures.

The report stressed the need to implement, effectively and through concrete action plans, specific provisions related to the roadmap for human, labour and environmental rights . It welcomed Peru's efforts and commitments to strengthen the implementation of its commitments under the trade and sustainable development chapter of the agreement, but called for further efforts to tackle violence against human rights defenders and leaders of social and ethnic communities, in particular violence against women.

Members strongly support the peace agreement in Colombia and reiterated the potential benefits and the need to make the best use of the agreement to contribute to the implementation of the peace agreement, including integrate land reform and the reconciliation process in Colombia.

Documents
2018/12/03
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/10/16
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/09/05
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/03/05
   EP - MÉLIN Joëlle (ENF) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2018/01/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2017/11/22
   EP - FISAS AYXELÀ Santiago (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0446/2018 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà - Am 1 #

2019/01/16 Outcome: -: 451, +: 148, 0: 34
AT CY ?? MT IE GB LU EL LV LT EE FI DK HR SI SE PT HU BE CZ SK NL BG ES IT RO FR DE PL
Total
16
4
1
6
9
63
4
17
5
8
6
10
10
8
8
19
18
14
21
19
13
24
14
48
57
21
62
80
47
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
34

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
29

United Kingdom ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1
4
icon: ECR ECR
63

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
167

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Croatia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium S&D

4

Czechia S&D

Against (2)

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
181

Cyprus PPE

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

A8-0446/2018 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà - § 18/2 #

2019/01/16 Outcome: +: 504, -: 91, 0: 37
DE ES FR IT RO NL PT BE HU BG SE FI CZ GB SI AT SK HR IE EE EL LT MT LU PL LV DK CY ??
Total
80
48
62
56
21
24
18
21
14
15
18
10
19
62
8
16
13
9
9
6
16
8
6
5
47
5
10
4
1
icon: PPE PPE
182

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
166

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Portugal ALDE

1

Czechia ALDE

4

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
34

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
62

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0446/2018 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà - Am 5 #

2019/01/16 Outcome: -: 451, +: 122, 0: 44
GB MT CY ?? IE EE LV AT LU FI DK LT SI EL HR SE PT HU BE BG SK NL CZ RO ES IT FR DE PL
Total
61
6
4
1
9
6
5
16
4
10
10
8
8
16
9
19
18
14
21
13
13
24
17
19
47
55
60
78
45
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
29

United Kingdom ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3
4
icon: ECR ECR
63

Finland ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
162

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

For (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

Against (2)

2
icon: PPE PPE
182

United Kingdom PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

A8-0446/2018 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà - Am 6 #

2019/01/16 Outcome: -: 499, +: 118, 0: 11
CY ?? MT IE AT LU LV LT EE EL FI DK SI HR SE NL PT HU BE SK CZ BG IT RO ES FR GB PL DE
Total
4
1
6
9
16
5
5
8
6
17
10
10
8
9
19
23
18
14
21
12
18
14
56
21
48
62
62
47
78
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
38

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
15

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
34

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

4

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: S&D S&D
166

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

Against (1)

3

Belgium S&D

4

Czechia S&D

Against (2)

2
3
icon: PPE PPE
183

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0446/2018 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà - Am 8 #

2019/01/16 Outcome: -: 338, +: 275, 0: 21
IT PT CY EL ES SE IE ?? RO LT DE MT LU LV DK FI AT EE HR SI SK HU BE NL FR CZ BG GB PL
Total
56
18
4
17
48
19
9
1
21
8
81
6
5
5
10
10
16
6
9
8
13
14
21
24
62
17
15
63
47
icon: S&D S&D
168

Cyprus S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
15

NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Portugal ALDE

1
4

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
183

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0446/2018 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà - Résolution #

2019/01/16 Outcome: +: 472, -: 80, 0: 74
DE IT PL GB ES RO BG HU FR BE SE SK AT CZ PT NL FI HR DK SI LT MT EE LV LU ?? IE CY EL
Total
79
56
46
62
45
21
15
14
61
20
19
13
16
18
18
24
10
9
10
8
8
6
6
5
5
1
9
4
17
icon: PPE PPE
180

United Kingdom PPE

2

Belgium PPE

4

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
165

Belgium S&D

Abstain (2)

4

Czechia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Sweden ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR