Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
Next event: Vote in plenary scheduled 2018/05/03
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider (S&D) | |
Opinion | EMPL | ||
Opinion | REGI |
Activites
-
2018/05/03
Vote in plenary scheduled
-
2018/04/26
Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
-
2018/04/24
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2018/04/16
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2018/03/23
Non-legislative basic document published
-
COM(2018)0156
summary
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to assist Belgium faced with redundancies in the machinery sector. PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council. CONTENT: the rules applicable to financial contributions from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund are laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. In this context, the Commission considered the request to mobilise the EGF to assist Belgium and stated the following: Belgium - Application EGF/2017/010 BE/Caterpillar: on 18 December 2017, Belgium submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF following 2 287 workers made redundant in Caterpillar Solar Gosselies (Caterpillar) and five suppliers (manufacture of machinery and equipment). The redundancies made by the enterprises concerned are located in the NUTS level 2 Hainaut region BE32. In order to establish the link between the redundancies and major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, Belgium argues that the main reason behind the workforce reductions is the worldwide competition in the construction and mining machinery sectors, and the consequent loss of machinery market share by Caterpillar. The mining sector´s production in Europe has decreased from EUR 234 million in 2012 to EUR 180 million in 2015 and the EU 28 exports have been in dramatic declining since 2014. The primary event giving rise to these redundancies is the announcement by Caterpillar Belgium S.A. on 2 September 2016 of starting the collective redundancy procedure at its production plant located in Gosselies. This is already Belgium's second EGF application in relation to Caterpillar. In 2014, 1 399 workers were the subjects of the first EGF application involving redundancies at the enterprise. The current proposal includes the remaining 1 997 workers at the site. In 2015, Caterpillar invested in a new assembly line to boost its position on the market. However, contrary to expectations, economic growth in Europe was very slow and consequently the economic situation of the enterprise did not recover as expected. Compared to other plants, its Gosselies facility in Belgium is no longer competitive. Consequently, Caterpillar has been relocating its production in emerging countries in Asia and Latin America, such as China and South Korea because of the fast-growing new markets and low production costs, linked to less restrictive environmental regulation and lower hourly labour costs. The company is now closing down all its activities in Belgium. Basis of the Belgian request: Belgium submitted the application under the intervention criteria of Article 4(1)(a) of the EGF Regulation, which requires at least 500 workers being made redundant over a reference period of four months in an enterprise in a Member State. The reference period for the application runs from 31 May 2017 to 30 September 2017. The application relates to 2 287 workers made redundant. Belgium is considering five types of actions in favour of the dismissed employees and NEETs: (i) individual job search assistance, case management and general information services; (ii) training and re-training; (ii) promotion of entrepreneurship; (iv) contribution to business start-ups; (v) allowances. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: following its assessment of this application, the Commission has concluded, in accordance with all applicable provisions of the EGF Regulation, that the conditions for awarding a financial contribution from the EGF are met. It proposed to mobilise the EGF for the amount of EUR 4 621 616, representing 60 % of the total costs of the proposed actions, in order to provide a financial contribution for the application. The proposed decision to mobilise the EGF will be taken jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, as laid down in point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management. At the same time as it presents this proposal for a decision to mobilise the EGF, the Commission will present to the European Parliament and to the Council a proposal for a transfer to the relevant budgetary line for the amount requested.
-
COM(2018)0156
summary
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2018)0156
Amendments | Dossier |
15 |
2018/2043(BUD)
2018/04/18
BUDG
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that Belgium argues that the redundancies are linked to major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, to worldwide competition in the construction and mining machinery sectors, and to the consequent decrease in the Caterpillar Group’s share in the machinery market; notes that the redundancies are related to the restructuring and cost-cutting global plan announced by Caterpillar in September 2015;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10 b. Is content to that the income support measures will account for 13,68% of the overall package of personalised measures, well below the maximum 35% set out in the Regulation; and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Recalls its resolution of 5 October 2016 on the need for a European reindustrialisation policy in the light of the recent Caterpillar and Alstom cases, , voted by a large majority by the European Parliament, which calls for Europe to deploy a genuine industrial policy based on in particular on research and development and innovation, but also emphasizes the importance of protecting Union industry from unfair commercial practices in third countries;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that as of 15 March 2018, only 591 of the dismissed workers had found a job; insists, therefore, that an analysis be carried out at the end of the EGF intervention period in order to assess whether further reintegration aid should be deployed; regrets that the previous decision on the mobilisation of the EGF concerning this company (EGF/2014/011)1a led to a relatively low percentage of beneficiaries becoming reemployed; hopes that the current proposal will take account of this experience; ____________________ 1aDecision (EU) 2015/471 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2014/011 BE/Caterpillar, from Belgium) (OJ L 76, 20.3.2015, p. 58).
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Recalls that in line with Article 7 of the Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Expresses concern that , as a result of less restrictive environmental regulation and lower labour costs, firms operating in third countries may be more competitive than those operating in the Union;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is aware of the decrease in production of the mining sector in Europe and the dramatic decline in EU-28 exports in that sector since 2014, the increase in the European steel price and the high production costs for machines resulting therefrom, in particular compared to China; regrets, however, that the Caterpillar Group has decided to allocate the volumes produced in the Gosselies plant to other production units in France (Grenoble) and to other plants outside Europe, including China and South Korea; which resulted in an abrupt
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Deplores th
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Insists on mitigation of the socio- economic consequences for the Charleroi region and the making sustained efforts for its economic recovery, in particular with the help of the European Structural and Investment Funds;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that the application relates to 2 287 workers made redundant at Caterpillar and five suppliers, the majority of whom are between 30 and 54 years of age; points also to the fact that
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Emphasises that the region of Hainaut’s unemployment rate is expected to rise by 6,1% and that job seekers in Charleroi are mostly low-skilled and that there is a high proportion of long-term unemployment;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that Belgium is planning five types of actions for the redundant workers and NEETs covered by this application: (i) individual job search assistance, case management and general information services, (ii) training and re-training, (iii) promotion of entrepreneurship, (iv)
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Welcomes the decision to provide training courses designed to match the development priorities of Charleroi set out in the CATCH plan1a; __________________ 1a Plan Catalysts for Charleroi (CATCH), Accélérer la Croissance de l'Emploi dans la Région de Charleroi, Septembre 2017 http://www.catch-charleroi.be/
source: 620.960
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
BUDG/8/12604
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|