Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | EMPL | WEBER Renate ( ALDE) | SANDER Anne ( PPE), PAVEL Emilian ( S&D), GERICKE Arne ( ECR), BEGHIN Tiziana ( EFDD), MARTIN Dominique ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted, by 589 votes to 39 with 10 abstentions, a resolution on the role of employee financial participation in creating jobs and reactivating the unemployed.
Background: Members recalled that according to data from the 2013 European Company Survey, employee financial participation (EFP) schemes can vary greatly according to company characteristics : 62% of European establishments use some form of variable pay, with profit sharing accounting for 30% and pay linked to group performance 25%. Share-ownership schemes are used by 5% of establishments.
EFP schemes involving workers in consultation and decision-making have proven benefits for both employees and the company . It can improve the organisational performance and quality of life of employees and can serve as a tool for innovation in the workplace to promote a sense of ownership, improve the flow of information within the company and the level of trust between employers and employees.
Stimulating the development of EFP in Europe : Parliament invited the Commission to consider recommendations to encourage Member States and companies, in particular SMEs, to develop and offer EFP schemes for the benefit and in the interest of both employees and companies. These schemes should:
protect workers’ income safety, not exploit workers in a crisis situation, not shift entrepreneurial risk to workers, guarantee a high level of protection for workers’ investments.
Members proposed a number of necessary measures for the EFP scheme that could be taken at EU level, such as:
provide non-mandatory incentives , including tax incentives that do not override national taxation rules, in line with best practice principles, when promoting employee ownership schemes among companies and employees; raise awareness and encourage the cross-border transferability of best practices between Member States; provide dedicated websites that would include model profit-sharing agreements for SMEs and VSEs for ease of implementation; assist companies which show an interest in EFP with solutions and specific support measures to avoid excessive administrative and development costs associated with implementing EFP, especially in SMEs; promote financial education in order to empower EU citizens and raise awareness about the implications of EFP; engage with social partners , employee ownership organisations and other stakeholders at the beginning of the process in order to design the most appropriate EFP frameworks; negotiate employee savings schemes and tools at a branch-by-branch level in order to provide SMEs and VSEs with standard agreements that can be implemented directly and conveniently by these companies.
Characteristics of the EFP : Parliament recalled that the decision to join EFP schemes should be totally voluntary , meaning no action should be taken against employees if they decide not to join. When they agree, their participation should be based on appropriate training and the informed consent of the employee.
The resolution also stressed that the EFP:
should be open to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis, regardless of age, gender, nationality, full-time / part-time work arrangements; should not be used to replace normal basic pay or other forms of remuneration or contributions to pension schemes such as social security contributions, but should be complementary to all social and contractual rights.
The Commission is invited to (i) implement the ‘ five-point action plan ’ included in the final report of the pilot project for the promotion of employee ownership and participation of 2014; (ii) continue collecting data on the use and spread of financial participation schemes.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Renate WEBER (ALDE, RO) on the role of employee financial participation in creating jobs and reactivating the unemployed.
Members recalled that according to data from the 2013 European Company Survey, employee financial participation (EFP) schemes can vary greatly according to company characteristics : 62% of European establishments use some form of variable pay, with profit sharing accounting for 30% and pay linked to group performance 25%. Share-ownership schemes are used by 5% of establishments.
These EFP schemes are more prevalent in the private sector than in the public sector (with some national exceptions), as well as in certain economic sectors, particularly information and communications technology, finance, insurance, and consultancy. EFP schemes involving workers in consultation and decision-making have proven benefits for both employees and the company .
Without calling for new EU-wide legislative instruments, this own-initiative report aims to stimulate the development of the EFP in Europe . It invited the Commission to consider recommendations to encourage Member States and companies, in particular SMEs, to develop and offer EFP schemes for the benefit and in the interest of both employees and companies. These schemes should:
protect workers’ income safety, not exploit workers in a crisis situation, not shift entrepreneurial risk to workers, guarantee a high level of protection for workers’ investments. Members propose a number of necessary measures for the EFP scheme that could be taken at EU level, such as: provide non-mandatory incentives , including tax incentives that do not override national taxation rules, in line with best practice principles, when promoting employee ownership schemes among companies and employees; raise awareness and encourage the cross-border transferability of best practices between Member States; provide dedicated websites that would include model profit-sharing agreements for SMEs and VSEs for ease of implementation; assist companies which show an interest in EFP with solutions and specific support measures to avoid excessive administrative and development costs associated with implementing EFP, especially in SMEs; promote financial education in order to empower EU citizens and raise awareness about the implications of EFP; engage with social partners , employee ownership organisations and other stakeholders at the beginning of the process in order to design the most appropriate EFP frameworks; negotiate employee savings schemes and tools at a branch-by-branch level in order to provide SMEs and VSEs with standard agreements that can be implemented directly and conveniently by these companies.
Members recalled that the decision to join EFP schemes should be totally voluntary , meaning no action should be taken against employees if they decide not to join. EFP should be open to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis and should not be used to replace normal basic pay or other forms of remuneration or contributions to pension schemes such as social security contributions, but should be complementary to all social and contractual rights.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0400/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0293/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE625.328
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE623.699
- Committee draft report: PE622.074
- Committee draft report: PE622.074
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE623.699
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE625.328
Activities
- Notis MARIAS
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dobromir SOŚNIERZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renate WEBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sotirios ZARIANOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0293/2018 - Renate Weber - Résolution 23/10/2018 13:28:55.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
136 |
2018/2053(INI)
2018/06/14
EMPL
111 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 – having regard to the
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recalls that the decision to join EFP schemes should be based on the informed consent of an employee, fully aware of his or her entitlements, obligations and risks, of the situation of the company and of the taxation effects when joining the scheme and the conditions which apply when he or she leaves the company or the scheme; highlights that employees should receive guarantees that no action will be taken against them if they decide not to join an EFP scheme;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recalls that the decision to join EFP schemes should be totally voluntary and based on the informed consent of an employee, fully aware of his or her entitlements, obligations and risks, of the situation of the company and of the taxation effects when joining the scheme and the conditions which apply when he or she leaves the company or the scheme;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Points out that employees having left the company following redundancy or voluntary resignation are often overlooked in internal communications related to the EFP scheme and that there needs to be an authority to guarantee their rights to information and fair management if the scheme does not automatically put an end to their participation;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that EFP benefits should always be complementary to the contractual remuneration and rights such as social security contributions and not a replacement of the above or a way to diminish the above;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that EFP
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider the rapid evolution and change of the labour market and the consequent challenges regarding skills, digitalisation, automation
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider the rapid evolution and change of the labour market and the consequent challenges regarding skills, digitalisation, automation and, potentially, wealth inequalities, and therefore continuously create new
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses the important role that the EFP can play in fostering entrepreneurship and an entrepreneurial mindset by facilitating research and access to capital, especially for start-ups;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas EFP schemes involving workers in consultation and decision- making have benefits for
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Highlights that although micro- enterprises play an important role in the economy of most EU Member States, no supportive measures for employee share ownership are implemented for them as yet;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas EFP schemes involving workers in consultation and decision- making might have benefits for the company i
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas EFP schemes involving workers in consultation and decision- making have benefits for the company in terms of sustainable governance, social dialogue and other aspects such as recruitment, retention,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas participative change in a company nourishes an environment of trust between management, employees and their representatives and whereas social dialogue can help inform employees about adaptation needs, promote employee involvement in operations, and engage the workforce in debates about the future of their company1b; __________________ 1b Innovative changes in European companies, Eurofound 2017
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas EFP schemes can play a significant role in additionally involving workers in information, consultation and decision-making processes during restructuring;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas employee participation in management through voting rights, the right to be present or other forms of governance can improve management and the flow of information and help employees to have a better understanding of the situation when their company faces challenges and a greater ability to access rewards when the company is doing well;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas employee participation could be used as a workplace innovation tool in order to promote organisational change and renewal and hence improve the quality of working life and organisational performance1c; __________________ 1cWorkplace innovation in European companies. Eurofound. 2016
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D c (new) Dc. whereas workers’ financial participation in their company can contribute to improvements in employees’ job satisfaction and overall performance and motivation; whereas it can also encourage employees to develop a sense of ownership as well as enhance mutual respect between employers and employees;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas there are several employee financial participation
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas EFP schemes
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas EFP schemes could have positive impacts on the economy of Member States by supporting SMEs and the job market, and by enabling employees to find opportunities in their home country;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the European Employment Strategy and the Europe 2020 Strategy set priorities to improve the quality of jobs and ensure better working conditions and whereas increasing employee participation in company financial results and offering better rewards could help to meet these goals;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas EFP can contribute to overcoming
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas EFP, if paired with proper training and information, can contribute to overcoming widespread reluctance among retail investors to invest their savings in shares owing to a lack of knowledge about its benefits and risks;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas EFP must go hand-in- hand with a high level of information for and consultation with staff so that they are fully aware of the functioning of the financial participation schemes that they could join, to enable them to make a fully informed assessment of the potential risks and benefits of these schemes;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas employees need to be aware that any form of investment is subject to the risk of losing the entire investment, as well as that in the case of the company’s bankruptcy, they would be faced with double economic loss;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the proportion of European shares held by Europeans must be increased;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas through EFP, enhanced social dialogue and strategic decision making, employers might invest in development opportunities for their workforce, thus contributing to the fight against social exclusion and ensuring a high level of training;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas the EFP consisting of employee share ownership schemes should be accompanied by adequate training for employees, so that they are fully aware of the level of risk inherent in their investment;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the most appropriate EFP model must be carefully chosen by the individual company and its workers taking due account of the wider national and sectorial context, and will mostly depend on the size, activity and status of the company,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas it is crucial that the shares of companies based in Europe are majority-owned by Europeans.
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas EFP can help SMEs with respect to business continuity by addressing company succession
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas by involving employees in the decision making process, EFP can help SMEs with respect to business continuity by addressing company succession problems;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas EFP
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas EFP, especially ESOPs or similar schemes could act as a shock absorber, allowing bonuses or other rewards
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas EFP, especially ESOPs or similar schemes could act as a shock absorber, allowing bonuses or other rewards to be managed in trusts by third parties, spreading the investment risk among the company’s principal shareholders and ensuring that workers have a portfolio of saved shares; whereas in EFP models that use an intermediate entity in listed companies, this entity can exercise voting rights or other forms of governance on behalf of employees allowing for collective representation;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas EFP must not become a way of passing on the business risk to employees;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas an ESOP
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas an ESOP
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the most appropriate EFP model will be put in place in each Member State so as to respect the specific characteristics of the country and the existing schemes and will mostly depend on the size, activity and status of the company, especially if it is listed;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas if employees obtain from their company’s owners a priority buy-out right, they may seek to safeguard their own jobs and this procedure may reduce uncertainty about their continued employment when there is the possibility of buyouts by other companies;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas measures
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas EFP may not be used to reduce the social and employment rights acquired by employees and must not replace normal basic pay or other forms of contribution, such as pension schemes;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas participation in the EFP should remain voluntary for employees, while not affecting their mobility; whereas the advantages and disadvantages of each scheme should be clearly explained to the person concerned;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas participation in the EFP should remain voluntary for employees, particularly in SMEs, while not affecting their mobility;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas participation in the EFP should remain voluntary for employees, while not affecting their mobility, their remuneration or their social security allowances;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas participation in the EFP should remain voluntary for employees, while not affecting their mobility or their rights to take collective action;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas EFP might not be suitable for all companies or employees and the matter should therefore be given very careful consideration before such a scheme is adopted;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas proactive employment policies such as support for genuine self- employment and regular and social entrepreneurship are critical tools for the reintegration of the unemployed into the labour market, in line with the European Entrepreneurship Action Plan adopted in January 2013;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas, according to the data from the 2013 European Company Survey, 62% of European establishments use some form of variable pay; whereas the most common type is pay linked to individual performance and assessed by management appraisal (43%), followed by payment by results (34%), profit sharing (30%) and pay linked to group performance (25%); whereas share- ownership schemes are used by 5%of establishments;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the European Social Fund could support frameworks similar to Sociedades Laborales as a supporting active labour market policy throughout Europe; whereas the Spanish Sociedades Laborales are a best practice example of an employee share ownership scheme for micro-enterprises;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) Na. whereas the current European Social Fund promotes social entrepreneurship and vocational integration in social enterprises and the social and solidarity economy and the new ESF Plus should continue to do so; whereas in the context of the social and solidarity economy, employee Financial participation is often an element and could be supported by the ESF;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, which supports re- skilling and EFP,
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas EU guidelines for EFP will help Member States develop EFP schemes throughout
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas EU guidelines for EFP will help Member States develop EFP schemes throughout Europe, potentially leading to the benefits mentioned above;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q a (new) Qa. whereas information about the economic situation of the company concerned as well as information about the attached risks should be available to the workers concerned at all times;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas EFP is affected by national taxation rules, and whereas it is not appropriate to develop a comprehensive ‘one size fits all’ model for EFP at EU level;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q a (new) Qa. whereas a set of basic guidelines could achieve public confidence and help EFP deliver on its objectives;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to consider appropriate
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to consider appropriate measures to encourage Member States and companies that show an interest in EFP to develop and offer EFP schemes which respect workers’ income safety and do not shift entrepreneurial risk to workers;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to consider appropriate measures to encourage Member States and companies that show an interest in EFP to develop and offer EFP schemes
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on Member States and the Commission to only promote EFP schemes which: (a) do not shift entrepreneurial risk to the workers; (b) preserve and respect wages as poverty-proof income from work; (c) are not abused in a crisis situation to lower workers’ wages;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Member States to provide incentives, in line with best practice principles, when promoting employee ownership schemes among companies and employees while supporting the highest standards of social protection for the employees and safeguarding their right to collective action;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Member States to provide non-mandatory incentives, in line with best practice principles, when promoting employee ownership schemes among companies and employees;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that EFP should always provide additional income and not be a substitute for fair and decent pay; stresses that EFP should equally not be an alternative to public pensions or to collectively agreed pension schemes;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to implement the “five point action plan” included in the final report of the pilot project for the promotion of employee ownership and participation from 2014;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on Member States to provide for EFP-based incentive schemes to reward the productivity of individual employees, including the use of tax cuts;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines that EFP has to be embedded in a whole system of workers’ involvement at all levels, and schemes should include the possibility of employee representatives in company decision making through seats on the board;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights the importance of EFP schemes being designed in such a way that they protect employees' investment;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the transnational obstacles that are faced by both companies
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the transnational obstacles that are faced by both companies offering such schemes in several Member States, and employees, namely discrepancies in legislation and t
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that a framework for a European model of employee ownership should not override national taxation or social security rules;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Member States to put forward targeted solutions and specific support measures for SMEs, in particular by encouraging the operators of employee savings schemes, such as banks and investment funds, to propose simple incentive schemes tailored to suit this type of company;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission, with the help of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, to continue collecting data on the use and spread of financial participation schemes, as well as to examine the impact of financial participation on the functioning of the company, the quality of its work and retention of workers in employment;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that, to avoid administrative and development costs associated with implementing EFP in corporations and SMEs, there are outsourcing options, but these need to be
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas financial participation should not be used to avoid compliance with labour law, or as a means of reducing acquired social and labour rights or applying pressure to increase labour market flexibility;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that, to avoid administrative and development costs associated with
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that that experience shows that some financial intermediaries charge excessive administrative fees in view of the work required and that public oversight should be introduced to ensure that these small shareholders are protected;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines the need to ensure that EFP guarantees the right of employees to take part in company decision making;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses the importance, especially for SMEs, of Member States each introducing a one-stop service proposing a model for employee financial participation so as to reduce administrative costs;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote financial education
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to exclude financial institutions and managers convicted of banking misconduct from trading in or administering employee financial participation schemes for a period of 10 years from their conviction;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to engage with social partners, employee ownership organisations and other stakeholders to
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to engage with social partners, employee ownership organisations and other stakeholders to design the most appropriate EFP schemes, negotiated on a ‘plant-by-plant’ basis and considering the size and type of company, its workforce and financial situation, but also the national legislation and practices;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to engage with social partners, employee ownership organisations and other stakeholders to design the most appropriate EFP schemes, negotiated on a ‘plant-by-plant’ basis and considering the type of company, its workforce and financial situation, but also the national legislation and practices; underlines, that any design and introduction of EFP should be subject of prior consultation and agreement with worker representatives and trade unions;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recommends negotiating employee savings schemes and tools at a branch-by-branch level in order to provide SMEs and VSEs with standard agreements that can be implemented directly and conveniently by these companies;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Invites the Member States to provide, on dedicated institutional sites, model profit-sharing agreements for SMEs and VSEs for ease of implementation;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Highlights that EFP should be open to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis, regardless of age, sex, trade-union membership, full-time / part-time work arrangements, the size of the company, etc.;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Highlights that EFP should be open to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis, regardless of age,
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that greater transparency is needed in EFP schemes: information about the economic situation of the company concerned and information about the attached risks should be available to the workers concerned at all times;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Adds that differentiation between employees may be justified to meet the different needs and interests of the employees
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers that ESOPs should also allow employee to use the ESOP account for other equity than that of the current employer, as to mitigate concentration risk, particularly for SMEs;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recalls that the decision to join EFP schemes should be based on the informed consent of an employee, fully aware of his or her entitlements, obligations and risks, of the situation of the company and of the taxation effects when joining the scheme and the conditions which apply when he or she leaves the company or the scheme by ensuring the employee has a high level of information and training on the nature and characteristics of the financial participation schemes to which he or she may be eligible;
source: 623.699
2018/09/14
EMPL
25 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Β B. whereas the most appropriate EFP model
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas measures are therefore needed to protect employees from facing
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas participation in the EFP should remain voluntary for employees, particularly in SMEs while not affecting their
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the current European Social Fund
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas EFP could be a complementary tool to the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas EU guidelines for EFP
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to consider appropriate
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Member States to provide
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines that EFP has to be embedded in a system of workers’ involvement, for example in company decision making, including through workers’ representatives and that EFP must not be a substitute for fair and decent pay nor an alternative to public pensions or to collectively agreed pension schemes;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide dedicated websites, that would include model profit- sharing agreements for SMEs and VSEs for ease of implementation; information about attached risks and other relevant material; further calls on the Commission and Member States to continue collecting data on the use and spread of financial participation schemes, as well as to examine the impact of financial participation on the functioning of the company, the quality of its work and retention of workers, with the help of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to engage with social partners, employee ownership organisations and other stakeholders
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recalls that the decision to join EFP schemes should be
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that EFP
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider the rapid evolution and change of the labour market
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas ESOPs are
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas EFP schemes involving
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas employee participation in decision making could improve organisational performance and employees’ quality of working life and whereas it could act as a workplace innovation tool4 to promote a sense of ownership, enhance the flow of information in the company, and improve levels of trust between employers and employees; –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 4Workplace innovation in European companies. Eurofound. 2016
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas EFP schemes c
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas in the context of the development of the Capital Market Union, the EFP c
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas EFP must go hand-in- hand with a high level of information, training and consultation with staff so that they are fully aware of the functioning of the financial participation schemes that they could join, to enable them to make a fully informed assessment of the potential benefits and risks of these schemes, such as in the case of the company’s bankruptcy;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
source: 625.328
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-PR-622074_EN.html
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-623699_EN.html
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-625328_EN.html
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE622.074
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.699
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.328
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0293&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0293_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0400New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0400_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/4 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
EMPL/8/11595New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 052New
Rules of Procedure EP 52 |
activities/2/date |
Old
2018-11-12T00:00:00New
2018-10-22T00:00:00 |
activities/1/date |
Old
2018-10-09T00:00:00New
2018-09-24T00:00:00 |
activities/0 |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
EMPL/8/11595
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0 |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-12-06T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|