BETA


2018/2103(INI) Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2017

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) GUILLAUME Sylvie (icon: S&D S&D), JUREK Marek (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2019/05/28
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2019/01/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/01/16
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/01/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 390 votes to 153 with 63 abstentions a resolution on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2017.

Rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights

Members stressed the importance of the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary, the principles of equality before the law, the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair and public hearing and stated that all Member States have willingly endorsed these fundamental values. They asserted that neither national sovereignty nor subsidiarity could justify the systematic refusal by a Member State to comply with the fundamental values of the European Union.

Parliament strongly condemned the efforts of some Member State governments to weaken the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary , and took the view that the EU should be able to initiate infringement procedures against Member States that are no longer upholding the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU, and that Article 7 TEU should be activated if all other remedies have failed. Members felt that the EU’s ineffectiveness as regards putting an end to the serious and persistent breaches of these values in some Member States is undermining both trust among the Member States and the credibility of the EU. They invited the Council to follow up any proposals from the Commission and Parliament relating to infringement procedures and possible sanctions.

Parliament also pointed out that improving the quality, independence and efficiency of national justice systems, in particular with regard to judges, prosecutors and lawyers, remains a key priority of the European Union. It added that there is an urgent need to introduce a gender-sensitive perspective into the Member States’ legal and judicial systems, including the institutionalisation of the gender component through training programmes for judiciary staff.

Parliament reiterated its call on the Commission to submit a proposal for the conclusion of a Union Pact for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (EU Pact for DRF).

It also called on all Member States and on the EU institutions to resolutely fight systemic corruption , and facilitate the rapid establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO), expressing its concern regarding legislative initiatives being put forward in certain Member States that might reverse reforms previously undertaken to strengthen the prevention of corruption.

Members called for the fundamental rights of EU citizens who have moved within the Union under freedom of movement to be protected after Brexit .

Parliament rejected any confusion between immigration and terrorism, and any use of counter-terrorism measures for the purpose of controlling certain migratory movements. It noted with concern that public authorities are increasingly resorting to administrative measures that are incompatible with the principles underpinning the rule of law.

Migration

Members condemned the abuses and human rights violations suffered by migrants and refugees. They discussed the need for: (i) pressing on with the reform of the Dublin Regulation, which is currently blocked in Council; (ii) protection-related schemes, such as resettlement and humanitarian admission; (iii) legal and safe pathways to the EU; (iv) sufficient funds to search and rescue operations in the context of a Europe-wide humanitarian operation; (v) an effective integration policy; (vi) protection of minors, women and vulnerable groups; (vii) less coercive measures than detention of asylum seekers; (viii) specific safeguards to guarantee that the interoperability of large-scale IT systems respects the fundamental rights of all citizens.

Parliament went on to recognise the work carried out by different NGOs operating in the Mediterranean and their efforts to save lives, recalling that sea rescue is a legal obligation under the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea . It called on Member States to support NGOs instead of hindering their work, and called for the allocation of sufficient funds to search and rescue operations in the context of a Europe-wide humanitarian operation.

Women’s rights

Parliament expressed its support for the demonstrations that took place in several Member States in 2017, following retrogressions related to sexual and reproductive health rights , and extensive media coverage of sexual harassment cases. It strongly affirmed that the denial of services related to sexual and reproductive health and rights, including safe and legal abortion, is a form of violence against women and girls. Member States were asked to guarantee comprehensive sexuality education and ready access for women to family planning and the full range of reproductive and sexual health services, including modern contraceptive methods.

Members called on the Commission to submit a legal act to support Member States in the prevention and elimination of all forms of violence against women and girls .

Media freedom, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly

Parliament strongly condemned the trends in certain Member States to concentrate media outlets in the hands of government-friendly business actors and to practise the misuse of public service media to disseminate only the government’s messages.

It also expressed deep concern about assassinations still being committed against journalists in Member States. Members emphasised the key role of whistle-blowers in safeguarding the public interest and pointed out that only ten Member States have introduced comprehensive legislation to protect whistle-blowers.

Racism and hate speech

Members condemned the rise of far-right movements in the strongest possible terms and were concerned at the trivialisation of hate speech, which can be attributed to some political figures. Member States were called upon to ensure the effective practical enforcement of the Race Equality Directive.

The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)

Lastly, Parliament noted that the FRA has become a centre of excellence in providing fundamental rights evidence to the EU institutions and Member States and welcomed its work in different areas, for example at the migration hotspots in Greece and Italy. It called for the global statutory mission of the Agency to be extended to include the operational task of providing technical assistance, training and capacity-building on fundamental rights issues to the EU institutions, bodies and agencies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.

Documents
2019/01/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/12/13
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Josep-Maria Terricabras (Greens/EFA, ES) on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2017.

Rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights

Members stressed the importance of the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary , the principles of equality before the law, the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair and public hearing and stated that all Member States have willingly endorsed these fundamental values . They asserted that neither national sovereignty nor subsidiarity could justify the systematic refusal by a Member State to comply with the fundamental values of the European Union.

The report strongly condemned the efforts of some Member State governments to weaken the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary, and took the view that the EU should be able to initiate infringement procedures against Member States that are no longer upholding the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU, and that Article 7 TEU should be activated if all other remedies have failed. Members felt that the EU’s ineffectiveness as regards putting an end to the serious and persistent breaches of these values in some Member States is undermining both trust among the Member States and the credibility of the EU . They invited the Council to follow up any proposals from the Commission and Parliament relating to infringement procedures and possible sanctions .

Members reiterated their call on the Commission to submit a proposal for the conclusion of a Union Pact for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights ( EU Pact for DRF ), in the form of an interinstitutional agreement laying down arrangements facilitating cooperation between the Union institutions and the Member States in the framework of Article 7 TEU.

The committee also called on all Member States and on the EU institutions to resolutely fight systemic corruption , and facilitate the rapid establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) , expressing its concern regarding legislative initiatives being put forward in certain Member States that might reverse reforms previously undertaken to strengthen the prevention of corruption.

Members went on to highlight freedom of movement as one of the principal fundamental rights guaranteed by the EU, and called for the fundamental rights of EU citizens who have moved within the Union under freedom of movement to be protected after Brexit.

The report rejected any confusion between immigration and terrorism , and any use of counter-terrorism measures for the purpose of controlling certain migratory movements. It noted with concern that public authorities are increasingly resorting to administrative measures that are incompatible with the principles underpinning the rule of law.

Migration

Members condemned the abuses and human rights violations suffered by migrants and refugees, in particular with regard to access to territory, reception conditions, asylum procedures, immigration detention and the protection of vulnerable persons. They discussed the need for: (i) pressing on with the reform of the Dublin Regulation, which is currently blocked in Council; (ii) protection-related schemes, such as resettlement and humanitarian admission; (iii) legal and safe pathways to the EU; (iv) sufficient funds to search and rescue operations in the context of a Europe-wide humanitarian operation; (v) an effective integration policy; (vi) protection of minors, women and vulnerable groups; (vii) less coercive measures than detention of asylum seekers; (viii) specific safeguards to guarantee that the interoperability of large-scale IT systems respects the fundamental rights of all citizens.

Women’s rights

Member States were called upon to consider six main areas of intervention in order to step up their commitment to safeguarding the dignity and rights of women and girls: (i) empowering equality bodies to deal with the entire range of issues that impact on women’s rights, from gender equality to violence against women; (ii) improving online safety; (iii) promoting gender equality in education and lifelong learning more effectively; (iv) introducing gender quotas as a bold step towards positive action; (v) mainstreaming gender equality in the coordination of economic policies across the EU through the European Semester; and (vi) improving data collection and the dissemination of knowledge on all forms of discrimination and violence against women and girls.

Members called on the Commission to submit a legal act to support Member States in the prevention and elimination of all forms of violence against women and girls.

Media freedom, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly

The report called on Member States to take adequate measures that promote the existence of pluralist, independent and free media, strongly condemning the trends in certain Member States to concentrate media outlets in the hands of government-friendly business actors and to practise the misuse of public service media to disseminate only the government’s messages.

It also expressed deep concern about assassinations still being committed against journalists in Member States. Members emphasised the key role of whistle-blowers in safeguarding the public interest and pointed out that only ten Member States have introduced comprehensive legislation to protect whistle-blowers.

Racism and hate speech

Members condemned the rise of far-right movements in the strongest possible terms and were concerned at the trivialisation of hate speech which can be attributed to some political figures. They expressed concern that 2017 saw no major improvement in terms of achieving the goals of the National Roma Integration Strategies. Member States were called upon to ensure the effective practical enforcement of the Race Equality Directive.

The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)

Lastly, the report welcomed the operational work of the FRA in different areas, for example at the migration hotspots in Greece and Italy, as well as its awareness-raising and training activities in the area of human rights. It called for the global statutory mission of the Agency to be extended to include the operational task of providing technical assistance, training and capacity-building on fundamental rights issues to the EU institutions, bodies and agencies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.

Documents
2018/12/03
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/10/05
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/05
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/08/28
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/06/14
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2018/05/24
   EP - TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0466/2018 - Josep-Maria Terricabras - § 23 #

2019/01/16 Outcome: +: 391, -: 165, 0: 62
FR IT ES GB DE BE SE RO PT NL FI EL IE CZ BG DK LU CY LV EE HR ?? SI LT AT SK HU MT PL
Total
62
57
48
58
77
21
18
20
17
24
10
17
9
17
13
10
5
4
5
5
8
1
8
8
16
13
14
6
46
icon: S&D S&D
164

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Czechia ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58
4

Sweden ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
29

United Kingdom ENF

4

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2
icon: PPE PPE
178

United Kingdom PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4
5

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Latvia PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (2)

5

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

3

A8-0466/2018 - Josep-Maria Terricabras - Visa 22 #

2019/01/16 Outcome: +: 504, -: 83, 0: 37
DE IT FR PL ES GB RO BG EL HU CZ SK NL SE AT BE FI HR DK PT SI MT EE LV LU LT ?? CY IE
Total
79
57
62
45
47
62
21
15
16
14
17
12
24
19
16
21
10
9
10
17
8
6
5
5
4
8
1
4
9
icon: PPE PPE
181

United Kingdom PPE

2

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
165

Czechia S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

Against (2)

4

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Germany GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

Spain Verts/ALE

4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A8-0466/2018 - Josep-Maria Terricabras - Considérant F/1 #

2019/01/16 Outcome: +: 519, -: 53, 0: 51
DE ES GB PL IT FR RO BE PT NL SE BG HU EL FI IE CZ DK AT EE MT SK LU HR SI LT CY LV ??
Total
78
47
60
46
55
61
21
21
18
24
18
15
14
17
10
9
17
10
16
6
6
13
5
9
8
8
4
5
1
icon: S&D S&D
163

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1
icon: PPE PPE
181

United Kingdom PPE

2

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Croatia PPE

4
5

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Czechia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
32

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0466/2018 - Josep-Maria Terricabras - Considérant F/2 #

2019/01/16 Outcome: +: 394, -: 184, 0: 39
FR IT GB ES BE SE DE NL RO EL FI BG IE DK CZ PT EE CY LU HR ?? LV LT AT SI SK MT HU PL
Total
59
54
60
47
20
19
79
24
21
17
10
15
8
10
16
17
6
4
5
8
1
5
8
16
7
13
6
14
47
icon: S&D S&D
161

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Czechia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Czechia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3
icon: NI NI
15

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

United Kingdom ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2
icon: PPE PPE
179

United Kingdom PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

2

Croatia PPE

3

Latvia PPE

For (1)

3

Lithuania PPE

Abstain (1)

3

A8-0466/2018 - Josep-Maria Terricabras - Résolution #

2019/01/16 Outcome: +: 390, -: 153, 0: 63
ES DE IT FR RO SE BE PT NL BG FI LU CZ IE EE EL CY LT LV AT DK HR ?? MT PL SK SI HU GB
Total
43
78
54
58
21
18
21
17
23
15
9
5
17
8
6
16
4
8
5
16
9
8
1
5
47
13
7
14
59
icon: S&D S&D
159

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
176

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

3

Latvia PPE

For (1)

3

Croatia PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4
6

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (1)

5

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
52

Portugal ALDE

1
3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

For (1)

4

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
32

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
27

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
416 2018/2103(INI)
2018/10/05 LIBE 416 amendments...
source: 628.588

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/2
name
VERGIAT Marie-Christine
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-626941_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-628530_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-628588_EN.html
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2019-01-16-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
docs/0/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.941
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.530
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.588
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2018-12-13T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0466_EN.html title: A8-0466/2018
summary
events/2
date
2018-12-13T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0466_EN.html title: A8-0466/2018
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190116&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2019-01-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0032_EN.html title: T8-0032/2019
summary
events/5
date
2019-01-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0032_EN.html title: T8-0032/2019
summary
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0466&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0466_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0032
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0032_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria date: 2018-05-24T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2018-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
activities
  • date: 2018-06-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GUILLAUME Sylvie group: ECR name: JUREK Marek group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2018-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria
  • date: 2018-12-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2018-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2018-05-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria
docs
  • date: 2018-08-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.941 title: PE626.941 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.530 title: PE628.530 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.588 title: PE628.588 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2019-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=31956&j=0&l=en title: SP(2019)355 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2018-06-14T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-12-03T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-12-13T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0466&language=EN title: A8-0466/2018 summary: The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Josep-Maria Terricabras (Greens/EFA, ES) on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2017. Rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights Members stressed the importance of the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary , the principles of equality before the law, the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair and public hearing and stated that all Member States have willingly endorsed these fundamental values . They asserted that neither national sovereignty nor subsidiarity could justify the systematic refusal by a Member State to comply with the fundamental values of the European Union. The report strongly condemned the efforts of some Member State governments to weaken the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary, and took the view that the EU should be able to initiate infringement procedures against Member States that are no longer upholding the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU, and that Article 7 TEU should be activated if all other remedies have failed. Members felt that the EU’s ineffectiveness as regards putting an end to the serious and persistent breaches of these values in some Member States is undermining both trust among the Member States and the credibility of the EU . They invited the Council to follow up any proposals from the Commission and Parliament relating to infringement procedures and possible sanctions . Members reiterated their call on the Commission to submit a proposal for the conclusion of a Union Pact for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights ( EU Pact for DRF ), in the form of an interinstitutional agreement laying down arrangements facilitating cooperation between the Union institutions and the Member States in the framework of Article 7 TEU. The committee also called on all Member States and on the EU institutions to resolutely fight systemic corruption , and facilitate the rapid establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) , expressing its concern regarding legislative initiatives being put forward in certain Member States that might reverse reforms previously undertaken to strengthen the prevention of corruption. Members went on to highlight freedom of movement as one of the principal fundamental rights guaranteed by the EU, and called for the fundamental rights of EU citizens who have moved within the Union under freedom of movement to be protected after Brexit. The report rejected any confusion between immigration and terrorism , and any use of counter-terrorism measures for the purpose of controlling certain migratory movements. It noted with concern that public authorities are increasingly resorting to administrative measures that are incompatible with the principles underpinning the rule of law. Migration Members condemned the abuses and human rights violations suffered by migrants and refugees, in particular with regard to access to territory, reception conditions, asylum procedures, immigration detention and the protection of vulnerable persons. They discussed the need for: (i) pressing on with the reform of the Dublin Regulation, which is currently blocked in Council; (ii) protection-related schemes, such as resettlement and humanitarian admission; (iii) legal and safe pathways to the EU; (iv) sufficient funds to search and rescue operations in the context of a Europe-wide humanitarian operation; (v) an effective integration policy; (vi) protection of minors, women and vulnerable groups; (vii) less coercive measures than detention of asylum seekers; (viii) specific safeguards to guarantee that the interoperability of large-scale IT systems respects the fundamental rights of all citizens. Women’s rights Member States were called upon to consider six main areas of intervention in order to step up their commitment to safeguarding the dignity and rights of women and girls: (i) empowering equality bodies to deal with the entire range of issues that impact on women’s rights, from gender equality to violence against women; (ii) improving online safety; (iii) promoting gender equality in education and lifelong learning more effectively; (iv) introducing gender quotas as a bold step towards positive action; (v) mainstreaming gender equality in the coordination of economic policies across the EU through the European Semester; and (vi) improving data collection and the dissemination of knowledge on all forms of discrimination and violence against women and girls. Members called on the Commission to submit a legal act to support Member States in the prevention and elimination of all forms of violence against women and girls. Media freedom, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly The report called on Member States to take adequate measures that promote the existence of pluralist, independent and free media, strongly condemning the trends in certain Member States to concentrate media outlets in the hands of government-friendly business actors and to practise the misuse of public service media to disseminate only the government’s messages. It also expressed deep concern about assassinations still being committed against journalists in Member States. Members emphasised the key role of whistle-blowers in safeguarding the public interest and pointed out that only ten Member States have introduced comprehensive legislation to protect whistle-blowers. Racism and hate speech Members condemned the rise of far-right movements in the strongest possible terms and were concerned at the trivialisation of hate speech which can be attributed to some political figures. They expressed concern that 2017 saw no major improvement in terms of achieving the goals of the National Roma Integration Strategies. Member States were called upon to ensure the effective practical enforcement of the Race Equality Directive. The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) Lastly, the report welcomed the operational work of the FRA in different areas, for example at the migration hotspots in Greece and Italy, as well as its awareness-raising and training activities in the area of human rights. It called for the global statutory mission of the Agency to be extended to include the operational task of providing technical assistance, training and capacity-building on fundamental rights issues to the EU institutions, bodies and agencies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.
  • date: 2019-01-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31956&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2019-01-16T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190116&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2019-01-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0032 title: T8-0032/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 390 votes to 153 with 63 abstentions a resolution on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2017. Rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights Members stressed the importance of the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary, the principles of equality before the law, the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair and public hearing and stated that all Member States have willingly endorsed these fundamental values. They asserted that neither national sovereignty nor subsidiarity could justify the systematic refusal by a Member State to comply with the fundamental values of the European Union. Parliament strongly condemned the efforts of some Member State governments to weaken the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary , and took the view that the EU should be able to initiate infringement procedures against Member States that are no longer upholding the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU, and that Article 7 TEU should be activated if all other remedies have failed. Members felt that the EU’s ineffectiveness as regards putting an end to the serious and persistent breaches of these values in some Member States is undermining both trust among the Member States and the credibility of the EU. They invited the Council to follow up any proposals from the Commission and Parliament relating to infringement procedures and possible sanctions. Parliament also pointed out that improving the quality, independence and efficiency of national justice systems, in particular with regard to judges, prosecutors and lawyers, remains a key priority of the European Union. It added that there is an urgent need to introduce a gender-sensitive perspective into the Member States’ legal and judicial systems, including the institutionalisation of the gender component through training programmes for judiciary staff. Parliament reiterated its call on the Commission to submit a proposal for the conclusion of a Union Pact for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (EU Pact for DRF). It also called on all Member States and on the EU institutions to resolutely fight systemic corruption , and facilitate the rapid establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO), expressing its concern regarding legislative initiatives being put forward in certain Member States that might reverse reforms previously undertaken to strengthen the prevention of corruption. Members called for the fundamental rights of EU citizens who have moved within the Union under freedom of movement to be protected after Brexit . Parliament rejected any confusion between immigration and terrorism, and any use of counter-terrorism measures for the purpose of controlling certain migratory movements. It noted with concern that public authorities are increasingly resorting to administrative measures that are incompatible with the principles underpinning the rule of law. Migration Members condemned the abuses and human rights violations suffered by migrants and refugees. They discussed the need for: (i) pressing on with the reform of the Dublin Regulation, which is currently blocked in Council; (ii) protection-related schemes, such as resettlement and humanitarian admission; (iii) legal and safe pathways to the EU; (iv) sufficient funds to search and rescue operations in the context of a Europe-wide humanitarian operation; (v) an effective integration policy; (vi) protection of minors, women and vulnerable groups; (vii) less coercive measures than detention of asylum seekers; (viii) specific safeguards to guarantee that the interoperability of large-scale IT systems respects the fundamental rights of all citizens. Parliament went on to recognise the work carried out by different NGOs operating in the Mediterranean and their efforts to save lives, recalling that sea rescue is a legal obligation under the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea . It called on Member States to support NGOs instead of hindering their work, and called for the allocation of sufficient funds to search and rescue operations in the context of a Europe-wide humanitarian operation. Women’s rights Parliament expressed its support for the demonstrations that took place in several Member States in 2017, following retrogressions related to sexual and reproductive health rights , and extensive media coverage of sexual harassment cases. It strongly affirmed that the denial of services related to sexual and reproductive health and rights, including safe and legal abortion, is a form of violence against women and girls. Member States were asked to guarantee comprehensive sexuality education and ready access for women to family planning and the full range of reproductive and sexual health services, including modern contraceptive methods. Members called on the Commission to submit a legal act to support Member States in the prevention and elimination of all forms of violence against women and girls . Media freedom, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly Parliament strongly condemned the trends in certain Member States to concentrate media outlets in the hands of government-friendly business actors and to practise the misuse of public service media to disseminate only the government’s messages. It also expressed deep concern about assassinations still being committed against journalists in Member States. Members emphasised the key role of whistle-blowers in safeguarding the public interest and pointed out that only ten Member States have introduced comprehensive legislation to protect whistle-blowers. Racism and hate speech Members condemned the rise of far-right movements in the strongest possible terms and were concerned at the trivialisation of hate speech, which can be attributed to some political figures. Member States were called upon to ensure the effective practical enforcement of the Race Equality Directive. The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) Lastly, Parliament noted that the FRA has become a centre of excellence in providing fundamental rights evidence to the EU institutions and Member States and welcomed its work in different areas, for example at the migration hotspots in Greece and Italy. It called for the global statutory mission of the Agency to be extended to include the operational task of providing technical assistance, training and capacity-building on fundamental rights issues to the EU institutions, bodies and agencies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.
  • date: 2019-01-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/justice-and-consumers_en title: Justice and Consumers commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/8/13366
New
  • LIBE/8/13366
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure completed
procedure/subject
Old
  • 1.10 Fundamental rights in the EU, Charter
New
1.10
Fundamental rights in the EU, Charter
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 052
New
Rules of Procedure EP 52
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
JOUROVÁ Věra
activities
  • date: 2018-06-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GUILLAUME Sylvie group: ECR name: JUREK Marek group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2018-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria
  • date: 2018-12-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GUILLAUME Sylvie group: ECR name: JUREK Marek group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2018-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TERRICABRAS Josep-Maria
links
other
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    LIBE/8/13366
    reference
    2018/2103(INI)
    title
    Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2017
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure EP 052
    stage_reached
    Awaiting committee decision
    subtype
    Annual report
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject
    1.10 Fundamental rights in the EU, Charter