BETA


2018/2149(INI) 2018 Commission report on Kosovo

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET ŠOLTES Igor (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) ADAKTUSSON Lars (icon: PPE PPE), PANZERI Pier Antonio (icon: S&D S&D), DZHAMBAZKI Angel (icon: ECR ECR), VAUTMANS Hilde (icon: ALDE ALDE), CASTALDO Fabio Massimo (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 87-p4

Events

2019/03/26
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/11/29
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/11/29
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 139 with 71 abstentions a resolution on the 2018 Commission Report on Kosovo.

Whilst welcoming the important pieces of legislation adopted within the framework of the European Reform Agenda, Parliament pointed to the slow pace in implementing fundamental reforms, caused by a lack of cross-party consensus and continued political polarisation . It called on all political parties to establish an inclusive political dialogue and condemned the obstructive behaviour of some parliamentarians.

Members also welcomed the fact that the area of public administration has registered some progress , but called for the state administration to be depoliticised and restructured.

Visa liberalisation: Parliament considered it vital to grant visa liberalisation to Kosovo without undue delay, and welcomed the Commission’s confirmation, issued on 18 July 2018, that the benchmarks for visa liberalisation have been fulfilled, and called on the Council to swiftly adopt its mandate to move forward towards the adoption of a visa-free regime. It considered that visa liberalisation would improve stability and bring Kosovo closer to the EU by improving the ease of travelling and doing business, while helping to counter people smuggling and corruption.

Welcoming the long overdue ratification of the August 2015 Border Demarcation Agreement with Montenegro in March 2018, Members underlined the significance of this step towards visa liberalisation.

Further progress required : Parliament went on to discuss progress still required in several areas, including:

electoral shortcomings , including a lack of transparency on funding for political parties, and allegations of widespread voter intimidation, particularly within many Kosovo Serb communities, requiring measures to address the outstanding recommendations of EU and European Parliament observation missions and of the Venice Commission; Kosovo’s under-financed judiciary , widespread corruption, elements of state capture, undue political influence and issues of a lack of respect for fair trials and due process; corruption and organised crime , including drug and human trafficking, and cybercrime, which remain issues of concern that require concerted efforts; the need for a comprehensive approach to investigations and prosecutions , which should be substantiated by the freezing, confiscation and recovery of assets; the necessity for genuine and constructive judicial and police cooperation between Kosovo and Serbia’s authorities and support for the creation of a regional commission (RECOM) for the establishment of the facts about war crimes and other gross human rights violations committed in the former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 2001; gender-based violence and the under-representation of women in decision-making positions; the fact that minorities, such us Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians, continue to face problems acquiring personal documents, which affects their ability to access citizenship, education, healthcare and social assistance.

Relations with Serbia : Parliament noted the ongoing debate and public statements concerning possible adjustments of the border between Serbia and Kosovo , including exchanges of territories, and it stated that any agreement could only be acceptable if mutually agreed, taking into account the overall stability in the region and international law. Members underlined the multi-ethnic nature of both Kosovo and Serbia and that ethnically homogeneous states should not be the objective in the region. They supported the dialogue facilitated by the EU as the framework to reach a comprehensive normalisation agreement between Serbia and Kosovo.

Parliament added that a full normalisation of relations with Serbia , under a legally binding agreement and its implementing arrangements, would not be possible without a comprehensive and mutual application of the existing agreements and is a key element of both parties’ paths towards European integration. It noted that five EU Member States have not yet recognised Kosovo and invited them to do so, stressing that recognition would be beneficial to the normalisation of relations between Kosovo and Serbia.

Parliament regretted the fact that many of the agreements signed hitherto have not been implemented or have been delayed, such as those on energy and on the association of Serb majority municipalities. It called on the European External Action Service (EEAS) to carry out an evaluation of the performance of both sides in fulfilling their obligations so as to address all the challenges facing implementation.

Lastly, welcoming the signing of the agreement on Kosovo’s participation in the Erasmus+ and Creative Europe programmes, the resolution urged Kosovo to fully harness the potential offered by EU programmes.

Documents
2018/11/29
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/11/28
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/10/16
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Igor SOLTES (Greens/EFA, SL) on the 2018 Commission Report on Kosovo.

Whilst welcoming the important pieces of legislation adopted within the framework of the European Reform Agenda (ERA), Members pointed to the slow pace in implementing fundamental reforms, caused by a lack of cross-party consensus and continued political polarisation. They called on all political parties to establish an inclusive political dialogue and condemned the obstructive behaviour of some parliamentarians.

The committee also welcomed the fact that the area of public administration has registered some progress , but called for the state administration to be depoliticised and restructured.

The report went on to discuss progress still required in several areas, including:

electoral shortcomings , including a lack of transparency on funding for political parties, and allegations of widespread voter intimidation, particularly within many Kosovo Serb communities, requiring measures to address the outstanding recommendations of EU and European Parliament observation missions and of the Venice Commission; Kosovo’s under-financed judiciary , widespread corruption, elements of state capture, undue political influence and issues of a lack of respect for fair trials and due process; corruption and organised crime , including drug and human trafficking, and cybercrime, which remain issues of concern that require concerted efforts; the need for a comprehensive approach to investigations and prosecutions , which should be substantiated by the freezing, confiscation and recovery of assets; the necessity for genuine and constructive judicial and police cooperation between Kosovo and Serbia’s authorities and support for the creation of a regional commission (RECOM) for the establishment of the facts about war crimes and other gross human rights violations committed in the former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 2001; gender-based violence and the under-representation of women in decision-making positions; the fact that minorities, such us Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians, continue to face problems acquiring personal documents, which affects their ability to access citizenship, education, healthcare and social assistance.

The committee considered it vital to grant visa liberalisation to Kosovo without undue delay, and welcomed the Commission’s confirmation, issued on 18 July 2018, that the benchmarks for visa liberalisation have been fulfilled, and called on the Council to swiftly adopt its mandate to move forward towards the adoption of a visa-free regime.

Relations with Serbia : the report noted the ongoing debate and public statements concerning possible adjustments of the border between Serbia and Kosovo , including exchanges of territories, and it stated that any agreement could only be acceptable if mutually agreed, taking into account the overall stability in the region and international law. Members underlined the multi-ethnic nature of both Kosovo and Serbia and that ethnically homogeneous states should not be the objective in the region. They supported the dialogue facilitated by the EU as the framework to reach a comprehensive normalisation agreement between Serbia and Kosovo.

Members added that a full normalisation of relations with Serbia , under a legally binding agreement and its implementing arrangements, will not be possible without a comprehensive and mutual application of the existing agreements and is a key element of both parties’ paths towards European integration. They noted that five EU Member States have not yet recognised Kosovo and invites them to do so; stresses that recognition would be beneficial to the normalisation of relations between Kosovo and Serbia.

Lastly, the committee regretted the fact that many of the agreements signed hitherto have not been implemented or have been delayed, such as those on energy and on the association of Serb majority municipalities. It called on the European External Action Service (EEAS) to carry out an evaluation of the performance of both sides in fulfilling their obligations so as to address all the challenges facing implementation.

Documents
2018/10/09
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/09/10
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/07/05
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2018/07/02
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/05/16
   EP - ŠOLTES Igor (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2018/04/19
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to present a Commission staff working document on the Kosovo 2018 report in the context of EU enlargement.

BACKGROUND: t he EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) has been in force since April 2016. In order to define reform priorities, the Kosovo government together with the European Commission launched in November 2016 the European Reform Agenda (ERA). The Agenda outlines priority actions in the fields of good governance and the rule of law, competitiveness and investment climate, and employment and education. The implementation of the ERA is ongoing.

CONTENT: as regards alignment with European standards, Kosovo is at an early stage. Legislative alignment has continued in some areas but implementation is weak. Some progress was made in the area of free movement of goods and services, public procurement and competition as well as in improving the business environment. In the area of taxation and customs, some progress was also made in collecting revenue and simplifying administrative procedures, but Kosovo should step up the fight against the informal economy and tax evasion. The energy sector continues to face serious challenges. No progress has been achieved to address environmental issues. Overall, Kosovo needs to improve its administrative capacity and coordination, across all sectors, to ensure effective implementation of the acquis .

A summary of the main chapters of the report is as follows:

Political and economic dialogue : Kosovo held early elections in June 2017. A new Assembly and government took office in September. So far, however, the new ruling coalition has had limited success in bringing forward EU related reforms and building consensus on key strategic issues for Kosovo. The continuing political fragmentation and polarisation have adversely affected the role of the Assembly and have impacted the effectiveness of the government. The ratification of the border/boundary demarcation agreement with Montenegro in March 2018 was an important breakthrough.

As regards the economic criteria , Kosovo has made good progress and is at an early stage of developing a functioning market economy. The business environment has improved. However, the informal economy remains widespread. Kosovo has made some progress and is at an early stage in terms of capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the EU. No progress was made on improving the quality of education and addressing skills gaps in the labour market. Kosovo made some progress in improving road infrastructure but large infrastructure gaps in the railway and energy sectors remain. Structural changes in the economy are slow as it remains reliant on the retail trade sector. Integration with the EU is hampered by the slow implementation of the SAA.

Judicial system : Kosovo's judicial system is at an early stage. The integration of Kosovo Serb judges and prosecutors and their support staff across Kosovo into the Kosovo judicial system was a big achievement of 2017. The judiciary is still vulnerable to undue political influence and rule of law institutions need sustained efforts to build up their capacities. The administration of justice remains slow and inefficient.

Corruption and organised crime : Kosovo is at an early stage of preparation in the fight against corruption and organised crime. Law enforcement agencies struggle to effectively fight organised crime in the north of Kosovo. Some progress was made in the fight against terrorism, including through measures to tackle violent extremism and radicalisation and in preventing citizens from joining conflicts abroad. The Kosovo authorities need to be more effective in their efforts to fight money laundering and the relevant law should be brought in line with EU acquis and international standards.

Documents

Votes

A8-0332/2018 - Igor Šoltes - § 4 29/11/2018 12:15:44.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 523, -: 76, 0: 27
DE IT PL ES FR GB RO HU SE BG CZ BE NL IE AT HR SK LT FI SI PT LV DK MT LU EE EL ?? CY
Total
80
57
43
43
61
60
27
17
20
15
18
21
24
10
18
9
9
8
9
8
17
7
10
5
4
4
13
1
6
icon: PPE PPE
180

United Kingdom PPE

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
161

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Spain Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0332/2018 - Igor Šoltes - § 12 29/11/2018 12:16:21.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 393, -: 164, 0: 67
DE IT RO HU SE GB BG AT PT NL SI BE LV IE FI HR DK LT EE MT LU SK CZ ?? PL CY EL ES FR
Total
79
57
26
18
19
60
14
18
17
22
8
21
7
10
9
9
10
8
5
5
4
10
17
1
45
6
13
42
62
icon: S&D S&D
158

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
183

United Kingdom PPE

1

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Finland PPE

2

Croatia PPE

Against (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Germany GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

6

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0332/2018 - Igor Šoltes - § 33 29/11/2018 12:16:36.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 415, -: 153, 0: 59
DE IT FR BE SE HU RO BG NL AT PT GB IE FI SI DK LT LV HR CZ EE MT LU SK ?? PL CY ES EL
Total
77
57
62
21
20
17
26
16
24
18
17
59
10
9
8
11
8
7
9
18
5
5
4
9
1
45
6
42
14
icon: PPE PPE
182

United Kingdom PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Croatia PPE

Against (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
6

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
160

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Greece S&D

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

France Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

A8-0332/2018 - Igor Šoltes - § 42/2 29/11/2018 12:16:53.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 515, -: 75, 0: 43
DE IT PL GB FR RO BE SE HU ES BG CZ PT NL IE AT FI HR LT SI SK LV DK EE MT LU EL CY ??
Total
80
57
45
59
62
26
21
19
18
43
15
18
17
24
10
18
10
9
8
8
10
7
11
6
5
4
14
6
1
icon: PPE PPE
183

United Kingdom PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Greece PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
164

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

France Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0332/2018 - Igor Šoltes - Résolution 29/11/2018 12:17:09.000 #

2018/11/29 Outcome: +: 393, -: 139, 0: 71
DE IT GB RO HU PL BG SE AT BE HR FI NL PT LV DK SI LT EE MT IE SK LU CZ ?? CY ES EL FR
Total
73
54
58
26
16
44
15
18
17
20
9
9
22
16
7
11
7
8
6
5
9
11
3
16
1
6
43
14
57
icon: S&D S&D
151

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Greece S&D

Against (1)

4
icon: PPE PPE
175

United Kingdom PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
3
6

Luxembourg PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Germany GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
26

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Austria ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
AmendmentsDossier
235 2018/2149(INI)
2018/09/10 AFET 235 amendments...
source: 627.017

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/4
name
KOHLÍČEK Jaromír
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-623698_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-627017_EN.html
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-11-28-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
docs/0/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.698
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.017
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2018-10-16T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0332_EN.html title: A8-0332/2018
summary
events/3
date
2018-10-16T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0332_EN.html title: A8-0332/2018
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181128&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2018-11-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0479_EN.html title: T8-0479/2018
summary
events/6
date
2018-11-29T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0479_EN.html title: T8-0479/2018
summary
docs/2/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0332&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0332_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0479
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0479_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: ŠOLTES Igor date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ŠOLTES Igor group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ŠOLTES Igor group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ŠOLTES Igor group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
activities
  • date: 2018-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0156:FIN:EN:PDF type: Non-legislative basic document published title: SWD(2018)0156 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/european-neighbourhood-policy-and-enlargement-negotiations_en title: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations Commissioner: HAHN Johannes type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2018-07-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ADAKTUSSON Lars group: S&D name: PANZERI Pier Antonio group: ECR name: DZHAMBAZKI Angel group: ALDE name: VAUTMANS Hilde group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
  • date: 2018-10-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ADAKTUSSON Lars group: S&D name: PANZERI Pier Antonio group: ECR name: DZHAMBAZKI Angel group: ALDE name: VAUTMANS Hilde group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
  • date: 2018-10-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0332&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0332/2018 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2018-11-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in plenary scheduled
  • date: 2018-11-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
commission
  • body: EC dg: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations commissioner: HAHN Johannes
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ŠOLTES Igor group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
docs
  • date: 2018-07-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.698 title: PE623.698 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-09-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.017 title: PE627.017 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2019-03-26T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=31664&j=0&l=en title: SP(2019)92 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2018-04-19T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0156:FIN:EN:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2018)0156 summary: PURPOSE: to present a Commission staff working document on the Kosovo 2018 report in the context of EU enlargement. BACKGROUND: t he EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) has been in force since April 2016. In order to define reform priorities, the Kosovo government together with the European Commission launched in November 2016 the European Reform Agenda (ERA). The Agenda outlines priority actions in the fields of good governance and the rule of law, competitiveness and investment climate, and employment and education. The implementation of the ERA is ongoing. CONTENT: as regards alignment with European standards, Kosovo is at an early stage. Legislative alignment has continued in some areas but implementation is weak. Some progress was made in the area of free movement of goods and services, public procurement and competition as well as in improving the business environment. In the area of taxation and customs, some progress was also made in collecting revenue and simplifying administrative procedures, but Kosovo should step up the fight against the informal economy and tax evasion. The energy sector continues to face serious challenges. No progress has been achieved to address environmental issues. Overall, Kosovo needs to improve its administrative capacity and coordination, across all sectors, to ensure effective implementation of the acquis . A summary of the main chapters of the report is as follows: Political and economic dialogue : Kosovo held early elections in June 2017. A new Assembly and government took office in September. So far, however, the new ruling coalition has had limited success in bringing forward EU related reforms and building consensus on key strategic issues for Kosovo. The continuing political fragmentation and polarisation have adversely affected the role of the Assembly and have impacted the effectiveness of the government. The ratification of the border/boundary demarcation agreement with Montenegro in March 2018 was an important breakthrough. As regards the economic criteria , Kosovo has made good progress and is at an early stage of developing a functioning market economy. The business environment has improved. However, the informal economy remains widespread. Kosovo has made some progress and is at an early stage in terms of capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the EU. No progress was made on improving the quality of education and addressing skills gaps in the labour market. Kosovo made some progress in improving road infrastructure but large infrastructure gaps in the railway and energy sectors remain. Structural changes in the economy are slow as it remains reliant on the retail trade sector. Integration with the EU is hampered by the slow implementation of the SAA. Judicial system : Kosovo's judicial system is at an early stage. The integration of Kosovo Serb judges and prosecutors and their support staff across Kosovo into the Kosovo judicial system was a big achievement of 2017. The judiciary is still vulnerable to undue political influence and rule of law institutions need sustained efforts to build up their capacities. The administration of justice remains slow and inefficient. Corruption and organised crime : Kosovo is at an early stage of preparation in the fight against corruption and organised crime. Law enforcement agencies struggle to effectively fight organised crime in the north of Kosovo. Some progress was made in the fight against terrorism, including through measures to tackle violent extremism and radicalisation and in preventing citizens from joining conflicts abroad. The Kosovo authorities need to be more effective in their efforts to fight money laundering and the relevant law should be brought in line with EU acquis and international standards.
  • date: 2018-07-05T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-16T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0332&language=EN title: A8-0332/2018 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Igor SOLTES (Greens/EFA, SL) on the 2018 Commission Report on Kosovo. Whilst welcoming the important pieces of legislation adopted within the framework of the European Reform Agenda (ERA), Members pointed to the slow pace in implementing fundamental reforms, caused by a lack of cross-party consensus and continued political polarisation. They called on all political parties to establish an inclusive political dialogue and condemned the obstructive behaviour of some parliamentarians. The committee also welcomed the fact that the area of public administration has registered some progress , but called for the state administration to be depoliticised and restructured. The report went on to discuss progress still required in several areas, including: electoral shortcomings , including a lack of transparency on funding for political parties, and allegations of widespread voter intimidation, particularly within many Kosovo Serb communities, requiring measures to address the outstanding recommendations of EU and European Parliament observation missions and of the Venice Commission; Kosovo’s under-financed judiciary , widespread corruption, elements of state capture, undue political influence and issues of a lack of respect for fair trials and due process; corruption and organised crime , including drug and human trafficking, and cybercrime, which remain issues of concern that require concerted efforts; the need for a comprehensive approach to investigations and prosecutions , which should be substantiated by the freezing, confiscation and recovery of assets; the necessity for genuine and constructive judicial and police cooperation between Kosovo and Serbia’s authorities and support for the creation of a regional commission (RECOM) for the establishment of the facts about war crimes and other gross human rights violations committed in the former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 2001; gender-based violence and the under-representation of women in decision-making positions; the fact that minorities, such us Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians, continue to face problems acquiring personal documents, which affects their ability to access citizenship, education, healthcare and social assistance. The committee considered it vital to grant visa liberalisation to Kosovo without undue delay, and welcomed the Commission’s confirmation, issued on 18 July 2018, that the benchmarks for visa liberalisation have been fulfilled, and called on the Council to swiftly adopt its mandate to move forward towards the adoption of a visa-free regime. Relations with Serbia : the report noted the ongoing debate and public statements concerning possible adjustments of the border between Serbia and Kosovo , including exchanges of territories, and it stated that any agreement could only be acceptable if mutually agreed, taking into account the overall stability in the region and international law. Members underlined the multi-ethnic nature of both Kosovo and Serbia and that ethnically homogeneous states should not be the objective in the region. They supported the dialogue facilitated by the EU as the framework to reach a comprehensive normalisation agreement between Serbia and Kosovo. Members added that a full normalisation of relations with Serbia , under a legally binding agreement and its implementing arrangements, will not be possible without a comprehensive and mutual application of the existing agreements and is a key element of both parties’ paths towards European integration. They noted that five EU Member States have not yet recognised Kosovo and invites them to do so; stresses that recognition would be beneficial to the normalisation of relations between Kosovo and Serbia. Lastly, the committee regretted the fact that many of the agreements signed hitherto have not been implemented or have been delayed, such as those on energy and on the association of Serb majority municipalities. It called on the European External Action Service (EEAS) to carry out an evaluation of the performance of both sides in fulfilling their obligations so as to address all the challenges facing implementation.
  • date: 2018-11-28T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181128&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-11-29T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31664&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2018-11-29T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0479 title: T8-0479/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 139 with 71 abstentions a resolution on the 2018 Commission Report on Kosovo. Whilst welcoming the important pieces of legislation adopted within the framework of the European Reform Agenda, Parliament pointed to the slow pace in implementing fundamental reforms, caused by a lack of cross-party consensus and continued political polarisation . It called on all political parties to establish an inclusive political dialogue and condemned the obstructive behaviour of some parliamentarians. Members also welcomed the fact that the area of public administration has registered some progress , but called for the state administration to be depoliticised and restructured. Visa liberalisation: Parliament considered it vital to grant visa liberalisation to Kosovo without undue delay, and welcomed the Commission’s confirmation, issued on 18 July 2018, that the benchmarks for visa liberalisation have been fulfilled, and called on the Council to swiftly adopt its mandate to move forward towards the adoption of a visa-free regime. It considered that visa liberalisation would improve stability and bring Kosovo closer to the EU by improving the ease of travelling and doing business, while helping to counter people smuggling and corruption. Welcoming the long overdue ratification of the August 2015 Border Demarcation Agreement with Montenegro in March 2018, Members underlined the significance of this step towards visa liberalisation. Further progress required : Parliament went on to discuss progress still required in several areas, including: electoral shortcomings , including a lack of transparency on funding for political parties, and allegations of widespread voter intimidation, particularly within many Kosovo Serb communities, requiring measures to address the outstanding recommendations of EU and European Parliament observation missions and of the Venice Commission; Kosovo’s under-financed judiciary , widespread corruption, elements of state capture, undue political influence and issues of a lack of respect for fair trials and due process; corruption and organised crime , including drug and human trafficking, and cybercrime, which remain issues of concern that require concerted efforts; the need for a comprehensive approach to investigations and prosecutions , which should be substantiated by the freezing, confiscation and recovery of assets; the necessity for genuine and constructive judicial and police cooperation between Kosovo and Serbia’s authorities and support for the creation of a regional commission (RECOM) for the establishment of the facts about war crimes and other gross human rights violations committed in the former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 2001; gender-based violence and the under-representation of women in decision-making positions; the fact that minorities, such us Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians, continue to face problems acquiring personal documents, which affects their ability to access citizenship, education, healthcare and social assistance. Relations with Serbia : Parliament noted the ongoing debate and public statements concerning possible adjustments of the border between Serbia and Kosovo , including exchanges of territories, and it stated that any agreement could only be acceptable if mutually agreed, taking into account the overall stability in the region and international law. Members underlined the multi-ethnic nature of both Kosovo and Serbia and that ethnically homogeneous states should not be the objective in the region. They supported the dialogue facilitated by the EU as the framework to reach a comprehensive normalisation agreement between Serbia and Kosovo. Parliament added that a full normalisation of relations with Serbia , under a legally binding agreement and its implementing arrangements, would not be possible without a comprehensive and mutual application of the existing agreements and is a key element of both parties’ paths towards European integration. It noted that five EU Member States have not yet recognised Kosovo and invited them to do so, stressing that recognition would be beneficial to the normalisation of relations between Kosovo and Serbia. Parliament regretted the fact that many of the agreements signed hitherto have not been implemented or have been delayed, such as those on energy and on the association of Serb majority municipalities. It called on the European External Action Service (EEAS) to carry out an evaluation of the performance of both sides in fulfilling their obligations so as to address all the challenges facing implementation. Lastly, welcoming the signing of the agreement on Kosovo’s participation in the Erasmus+ and Creative Europe programmes, the resolution urged Kosovo to fully harness the potential offered by EU programmes.
  • date: 2018-11-29T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/european-neighbourhood-policy-and-enlargement-negotiations_en title: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations commissioner: HAHN Johannes
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/8/13290
New
  • AFET/8/13290
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 87-p4
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 81-p4
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.20 Enlargement of the Union
New
8.20
Enlargement of the Union
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Igor SOLTES (Greens/EFA, SL) on the 2018 Commission Report on Kosovo.

    Whilst welcoming the important pieces of legislation adopted within the framework of the European Reform Agenda (ERA), Members pointed to the slow pace in implementing fundamental reforms, caused by a lack of cross-party consensus and continued political polarisation. They called on all political parties to establish an inclusive political dialogue and condemned the obstructive behaviour of some parliamentarians.

    The committee also welcomed the fact that the area of public administration has registered some progress, but called for the state administration to be depoliticised and restructured.

    The report went on to discuss progress still required in several areas, including:

    • electoral shortcomings, including a lack of transparency on funding for political parties, and allegations of widespread voter intimidation, particularly within many Kosovo Serb communities, requiring measures to address the outstanding recommendations of EU and European Parliament observation missions and of the Venice Commission;
    • Kosovo’s under-financed judiciary, widespread corruption, elements of state capture, undue political influence and issues of a lack of respect for fair trials and due process;
    • corruption and organised crime, including drug and human trafficking, and cybercrime, which remain issues of concern that require concerted efforts;
    • the need for a comprehensive approach to investigations and prosecutions, which should be substantiated by the freezing, confiscation and recovery of assets;
    • the necessity for  genuine and constructive judicial and police cooperation between Kosovo and Serbia’s authorities and support for the creation of a regional commission (RECOM) for the establishment of the facts about war crimes and other gross human rights violations committed in the former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 2001;
    • gender-based violence and the under-representation of women in decision-making positions;
    • the fact that minorities, such us Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians, continue to face problems acquiring personal documents, which affects their ability to access citizenship, education, healthcare and social assistance.

    The committee considered it vital to grant visa liberalisation to Kosovo without undue delay, and welcomed the Commission’s confirmation, issued on 18 July 2018, that the benchmarks for visa liberalisation have been fulfilled, and called on the Council to swiftly adopt its mandate to move forward towards the adoption of a visa-free regime.

    Relations with Serbia: the report noted the ongoing debate and public statements concerning possible adjustments of the border between Serbia and Kosovo, including exchanges of territories, and it stated that any agreement could only be acceptable if mutually agreed, taking into account the overall stability in the region and international law. Members underlined the multi-ethnic nature of both Kosovo and Serbia and that ethnically homogeneous states should not be the objective in the region. They supported the dialogue facilitated by the EU as the framework to reach a comprehensive normalisation agreement between Serbia and Kosovo.

    Members added that a full normalisation of relations with Serbia, under a legally binding agreement and its implementing arrangements, will not be possible without a comprehensive and mutual application of the existing agreements and is a key element of both parties’ paths towards European integration. They noted that five EU Member States have not yet recognised Kosovo and invites them to do so; stresses that recognition would be beneficial to the normalisation of relations between Kosovo and Serbia.

    Lastly, the committee regretted the fact that many of the agreements signed hitherto have not been implemented or have been delayed, such as those on energy and on the association of Serb majority municipalities. It called on the European External Action Service (EEAS) to carry out an evaluation of the performance of both sides in fulfilling their obligations so as to address all the challenges facing implementation.

activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/5
date
2018-11-29T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0156:FIN:EN:PDF
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0156:FIN:EN:PDF
activities/3
date
2018-10-16T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0332&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0332/2018
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2018-10-09T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ADAKTUSSON Lars group: S&D name: PANZERI Pier Antonio group: ECR name: DZHAMBAZKI Angel group: ALDE name: VAUTMANS Hilde group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to present a Commission staff working document on the Kosovo 2018 report in the context of EU enlargement.

    BACKGROUND: the EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) has been in force since April 2016. In order to define reform priorities, the Kosovo government together with the European Commission launched in November 2016 the European Reform Agenda (ERA). The Agenda outlines priority actions in the fields of good governance and the rule of law, competitiveness and investment climate, and employment and education. The implementation of the ERA is ongoing.

    CONTENT: as regards alignment with European standards, Kosovo is at an early stage. Legislative alignment has continued in some areas but implementation is weak. Some progress was made in the area of free movement of goods and services, public procurement and competition as well as in improving the business environment. In the area of taxation and customs, some progress was also made in collecting revenue and simplifying administrative procedures, but Kosovo should step up the fight against the informal economy and tax evasion. The energy sector continues to face serious challenges. No progress has been achieved to address environmental issues. Overall, Kosovo needs to improve its administrative capacity and coordination, across all sectors, to ensure effective implementation of the acquis

    A summary of the main chapters of the report is as follows:

    Political and economic dialogue: Kosovo held early elections in June 2017. A new Assembly and government took office in September. So far, however, the new ruling coalition has had limited success in bringing forward EU related reforms and building consensus on key strategic issues for Kosovo. The continuing political fragmentation and polarisation have adversely affected the role of the Assembly and have impacted the effectiveness of the government. The ratification of the border/boundary demarcation agreement with Montenegro in March 2018 was an important breakthrough.

    As regards the economic criteria, Kosovo has made good progress and is at an early stage of developing a functioning market economy. The business environment has improved. However, the informal economy remains widespread. Kosovo has made some progress and is at an early stage in terms of capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the EU. No progress was made on improving the quality of education and addressing skills gaps in the labour market. Kosovo made some progress in improving road infrastructure but large infrastructure gaps in the railway and energy sectors remain. Structural changes in the economy are slow as it remains reliant on the retail trade sector. Integration with the EU is hampered by the slow implementation of the SAA.

    Judicial system: Kosovo's judicial system is at an early stage. The integration of Kosovo Serb judges and prosecutors and their support staff across Kosovo into the Kosovo judicial system was a big achievement of 2017. The judiciary is still vulnerable to undue political influence and rule of law institutions need sustained efforts to build up their capacities. The administration of justice remains slow and inefficient.

    Corruption and organised crime: Kosovo is at an early stage of preparation in the fight against corruption and organised crime. Law enforcement agencies struggle to effectively fight organised crime in the north of Kosovo. Some progress was made in the fight against terrorism, including through measures to tackle violent extremism and radicalisation and in preventing citizens from joining conflicts abroad. The Kosovo authorities need to be more effective in their efforts to fight money laundering and the relevant law should be brought in line with EU acquis and international standards.

activities/1
date
2018-07-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ADAKTUSSON Lars group: S&D name: PANZERI Pier Antonio group: ECR name: DZHAMBAZKI Angel group: ALDE name: VAUTMANS Hilde group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/8/13290
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
HAHN Johannes
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
HAHN Johannes
activities
  • date: 2018-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0156:FIN:EN:PDF type: Non-legislative basic document published title: SWD(2018)0156 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission:
  • date: 2018-11-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ADAKTUSSON Lars group: S&D name: PANZERI Pier Antonio group: ECR name: DZHAMBAZKI Angel group: ALDE name: VAUTMANS Hilde group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
links
other
    procedure
    geographical_area
    Kosovo under UNSCR 1244/1999
    reference
    2018/2149(INI)
    title
    2018 Commission report on Kosovo
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure EP 81-p4
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Annual report
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject
    8.20 Enlargement of the Union