Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D) | WINZIG Angelika ( EPP), GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D), CHASTEL Olivier ( Renew), PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE), FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( GUE/NGL) |
Former Responsible Committee | CONT | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | PETI | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Former Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Former Committee Opinion | PETI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Former Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Former Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Former Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Former Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Former Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Former Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Former Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Former Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Former Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Former Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Former Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Council for the 2017 financial year.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2019/2224 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017, Section II — European Council and Council.
CONTENT: the European Parliament has refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and the Council for the 2017 financial year.
The decision is accompanied by a resolution of the European Parliament containing the observations which form an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2017 financial year.
In its resolution, Parliament recalled the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the Council discharge procedures to date due to the lack of cooperation from the Council which led Parliament to refuse to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009 to 2016 and to postpone its decision on discharge in March 2019 for the financial year 2017.
Outstanding issues
Parliament expressed regret that the request to separate the budget of the European Council and the Council into one budget for each institution, made by Parliament in previous discharge resolutions, has not been considered. It insisted on this separation that will contribute to increased transparency in the financial management of both institutions and improve their accountability and expenditure efficiency.
It also reiterated its concern at the very high level of appropriations carried over from 2017 to 2018, in particular for furniture, technical equipment, transport and IT systems. It also deplored the Council's failure to give sufficient information on real estate policy.
Parliament deplored the Council's lack of participation in the transparency register. The Council should continue discussions on the technical aspects of the package of instruments regarding the transparency register in order to achieve a political agreement between the three institutions as soon as possible, given that enhanced transparency within in the European institutions will increase public confidence in the Union.
Moreover, concern was expressed about reports in the European media about corporate sponsorship of Member States hosting the EU Presidency. It proposed that the Council adopt guidelines to promote financial transparency and independence of Presidencies, and recommended that the Council envisage budgetisation of the Presidencies.
State of play
Parliament is encouraged by the fact that the Council considers it necessary to address the discharge procedure and is open to arriving at an agreement with Parliament on how to cooperate in this regard as rapidly as possible.
The European Parliament decided to refuse to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and the Council for the 2017 financial year.
In a resolution adopted by 662 votes to 24 with 9 abstentions, the European Parliament recalled the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the Council discharge procedures to date due to the lack of cooperation from the Council which led Parliament to refuse to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009 to 2016 and to postpone its decision on discharge in March 2019 for the financial year 2017.
Members stressed the importance of separating the budget of the European Council and the Council in order to contribute to greater transparency in the financial management of the two institutions and to strengthen their accountability and the effectiveness of their expenditure.
Parliament reiterated its concern at the very high level of appropriations carried over from 2017 to 2018, in particular for furniture, technical equipment, transport and IT systems. It also deplored the Council's failure to give sufficient information on real estate policy.
Deploring the Council's lack of participation in the transparency register, Members called on the Council to continue discussions on the technical aspects of the package of instruments regarding the Transparency Register in order to achieve a political agreement between the three institutions as soon as possible, given that enhanced transparency within in the European institutions will increase public confidence in the Union. They recalled Parliament's support for the Ombudsman's recommendations to the Council, namely to make it easier for citizens to follow the Union's legislative process (transparency of the Council's legislative process). They also called on the Council to be transparent to the citizens of the Union regarding the funds entrusted to it.
Members stressed that satisfactory cooperation between the European Parliament and the Council institutions, in the form of an open and formal dialogue procedure, would send a strong signal to the citizens of the Union.
Lastly, Parliament expressed concern about reports in the European media about corporate sponsorship of Member States hosting the EU Presidency. It proposed that the Council adopt guidelines to promote financial transparency and independence of Presidencies, and recommended that the Council envisage budgetisation of the Presidencies.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted a second report, presented by Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ (S&D, ES), on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017, Section II – European Council and Council.
The committee invited the European Parliament to refuse to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and the Council for the 2017 financial year.
In the draft resolution accompanying the report, Members recalled Parliament's role in the discharge procedure while stressing that the European institutions must act in a responsible and professional manner with regard to the implementation of their budgets.
Members recalled the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the Council discharge procedures to date due to the lack of cooperation from the Council which led Parliament to refuse to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009 to 2016 and in March 2019 for the financial year 2017. They regretted that the request to separate the budget of the European Council and the Council into one budget for each institution, made by Parliament in previous discharge resolutions, has not been considered. They reiterated their concern at the very high level of appropriations carried over from 2017 to 2018, in particular for furniture, technical equipment, transport and IT systems.
Deploring the Council's lack of participation in the transparency register, Members called on the Council to continue discussions on the technical aspects of the package of instruments regarding the Transparency Register in order to achieve a political agreement between the three institutions as soon as possible, given that enhanced transparency within in the European institutions will increase public confidence in the Union. They recalled Parliament's support for the Ombudsman's recommendations to the Council, namely to make it easier for citizens to follow the Union's legislative process (transparency of the Council's legislative process). They also called on the Council to be transparent to the citizens of the Union regarding the funds entrusted to it.
Members stressed that satisfactory cooperation between the European Parliament and the Council institutions, in the form of an open and formal dialogue procedure, would send a strong signal to the citizens of the Union.
The European Parliament decided to postpone discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council on the implementation of the budget of the European Council and the Council for the financial year 2017.
In its resolution adopted by 588 votes to 29, with 14 abstentions, Parliament stressed that the European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be democratically accountable towards the citizens of the Union in so far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union.
Parliament postponed the discharge to the European Council and the Council on grounds that they failed to cooperate in supplying the information needed. Parliament has denied discharge to the European Council and the Council for the last eight years.
Financial state of play
Members noted that in 2017 the European Council and Council had an overall budget of EUR 561 576 000 (compared with EUR 545 054 000 in 2016), with a global implementation rate of 93.8 % compared to 93.5 % in 2016.
Efforts were made to further improve its financial management and performance such as the harmonisation of budget planning at a central level by integrating Multiannual Activity and Budget Planning (MABP).
Members noted the increase of EUR 16.5 million (+3 %) in the budget of the European Council and Council in 2017 compared to an increase of 0.6 % in 2016. They also noted with concern the very high amount of appropriations being carried over from 2017 to 2018, particularly those in respect of furniture, technical equipment, transport and computer systems.
Budget separation
Once again, Parliament stressed that the budget of the European Council and the budget of the Council should be separated in order to contribute to transparency in the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions.
Future cooperation between Council and Parliament
Members regretted that the Council again failed to provide answers to the written questions sent by Parliament and that the Secretary-General of the Council did not attend the hearing organised on 27 November 2018 in the context of the annual discharge which again shows a complete lack of cooperation on the Council's side. The Council’s expenditure must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions.
The resolution recalled the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date due to a lack of cooperation from the Council. It recalled that Parliament refused to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009 to 2016.
Lastly, Parliament called on the Council to speed up its procedure for the discharge recommendations, with the goal to enable discharge in year n+1. It asked the Council to fulfil its particular role and to give discharge recommendations to the other Union institutions.
Based on the observations contained in the report by the Court of Auditors, the Council called on the European Parliament to grant discharge to all of the EU institutions in respect of the implementation of their respective budgets for the financial year 2017.
However, it considered that budget implementation required a series of comments from the Council which should be fully taken into account by the Commission.
The Council welcomed the fact that the administrative and related expenditure of the EU institutions remained, as in previous years, free from material error with an estimated level of error of 0.5 %, which while being well below the materiality threshold is higher by 0.3 % compared to the Court's findings for 2016 (0.2 %). It noted with satisfaction that no serious weaknesses were identified by the Court in the supervisory and control systems and in the examined annual activity reports.
The Council took note that, as in previous years, there was a small number of errors relating to staff costs and some weaknesses in the Office for Administration and Payment of individual entitlements' (PMO) management of family allowances. It called on the Commission to improve its procedures to avoid errors related to staff expenditure.
The Court did not identify any specific problems concerning the Council and the European Council.
PURPOSE: presentation of the Annual report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2017.
CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 41th annual report on the implementation of the general budget of the Union for the year 2017. This report follows a five-part structure:
- the statement of assurance (DAS) and a summary of the results of the audit on the reliability of accounts and the regularity of transactions;
- the analysis of budgetary and financial management;
- the Commission’s performance reporting framework;
- the findings on EU revenue;
- the presentation of the main headings of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF), the results of the testing of the regularity of transactions.
The Court concludes that payments for 2017 are legal and regular, with the expenditure recorded in 2017 covering spending on a reimbursement basis. It believes that the EU accounts present a true and fair view of the EU’s financial position.
The report also assessed the potential impact on the 2017 accounts of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union. On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom (UK) formally notified the European Council of its intention to leave the European Union (EU). On 22 May 2017, the negotiations started for the withdrawal agreement between the EU and the UK.
Part Five (Financial Provisions) of the draft withdrawal agreement of 19 March 2018 concerning the financial settlement states that the UK will pay all its obligations under the current and previous Multiannual Financial Frameworks as if it were still a Member State.
Based on this, the Court concluded that the accounts as at 31 December 2017 correctly reflect the withdrawal process.
The audit also focuses on the budget implementation of the Committee of the Council and the European Council .
The overall audit evidence indicates that the level of error in spending on ‘Administration’ was not material. For this MFF heading, our testing of transactions produced an estimated overall level of error of 0.5 %
The Court did not detect any specific problem regarding the Council and the European Council.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2017, as part of the 2017 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Council and Council.
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2017 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge . It is the decision by which the European Parliament ‘ releases ’ the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. It is granted by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.
The decision is based in particular on the European Court of Auditors reports, in particular its annual report, in which the Court provides a Statement of Assurance (DAS) on the legality and regularity of transactions (payments and commitments).
The procedure results in the granting, postponement or refusal of discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
All EU institutions and other agencies, bodies and joint undertakings are subject to their own discharge procedures.
Implementation of the European Council/Council’s (EC/C) appropriations for the financial year 2017 : the overall EC/C budget 2017 was set at EUR 561.6 million . This corresponds to an increase of EUR 16.5 million (+3.0 %) compared to 2016. The global implementation rate of the 2017 budget is 93.8 % (+1.9 % on top of the average of the last eight years).
Some of the main outcomes for 2017 included:
continuous work to consolidate positive developments after previous years’ crises. One visible result of this has been the Leaders’ Agenda which was presented by President Tusk and endorsed in the October European Council; the total number of meetings organised by the GSC went up by 26 % (1 524) compared to 2016 which is explained mainly by the increased activity of the presidency of the second semester and the creation of an ad hoc working group on Brexit.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2017, as part of the 2017 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Council and Council.
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2017 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge . It is the decision by which the European Parliament ‘ releases ’ the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. It is granted by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.
The decision is based in particular on the European Court of Auditors reports, in particular its annual report, in which the Court provides a Statement of Assurance (DAS) on the legality and regularity of transactions (payments and commitments).
The procedure results in the granting, postponement or refusal of discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
All EU institutions and other agencies, bodies and joint undertakings are subject to their own discharge procedures.
Implementation of the European Council/Council’s (EC/C) appropriations for the financial year 2017 : the overall EC/C budget 2017 was set at EUR 561.6 million . This corresponds to an increase of EUR 16.5 million (+3.0 %) compared to 2016. The global implementation rate of the 2017 budget is 93.8 % (+1.9 % on top of the average of the last eight years).
Some of the main outcomes for 2017 included:
continuous work to consolidate positive developments after previous years’ crises. One visible result of this has been the Leaders’ Agenda which was presented by President Tusk and endorsed in the October European Council; the total number of meetings organised by the GSC went up by 26 % (1 524) compared to 2016 which is explained mainly by the increased activity of the presidency of the second semester and the creation of an ad hoc working group on Brexit.
Documents
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0040/2019
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0010/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE641.114
- Committee draft report: PE638.755
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0246/2019
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0096/2019
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0096/2019
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05824/2019
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0013/2019
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 357 04.10.2018, p. 0001
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2018)0521
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2018)0521
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2018)0521 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0013/2019 OJ C 357 04.10.2018, p. 0001
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05824/2019
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0096/2019
- Committee draft report: PE638.755
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE641.114
Activities
- Othmar KARAS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2019/10/22 Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European Council and Council (debate)
- 2019/10/22 Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European Council and Council (debate)
- 2019/10/22 Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European Council and Council (debate)
- 2019/10/22 Discharge 2017: EU general budget - European Council and Council (debate)
- Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ryszard CZARNECKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bill NEWTON DUNN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stanislav POLČÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lara WOLTERS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim KUHS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matthew PATTEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tudor CIUHODARU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michael HEAVER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mikuláš PEKSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0096/2019 - Arndt Kohn - Résolution 26/03/2019 17:38:35.000 #
A8-0096/2019 - Arndt Kohn - Résolution #
A9-0010/2019 - Isabel García Muñoz - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
36 |
2018/2168(DEC)
2019/02/12
CONT
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Takes note that despite the mandate to begin negotiations with Parliament and Commission on the Council's participation in the Transparency Register taken on 6 December 2017, the Council has still not joined the Transparency Register; calls on the Council to follow up the negotiations and to reach a successful outcome with representatives of Parliament and Commission in order for the Council to finally join the Transparency Register;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Regrets that the Council again failed to provide answers to the written questions sent by Parliament and that the Secretary General of the Council did not attend the hearing organised on 27 November 2018 in the context of the annual discharge; stresses that the expenditure of Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of other institutions and points out that the fundamental elements of such scrutiny have been laid down in its discharge resolutions of the past years; points out that the European Parliament is the only institution directly elected by Union citizens and that its role in the discharge procedure is directly connected with citizens' right to be informed on how public money is spent;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Regrets that the Council again failed to provide answers to the written questions sent by Parliament and that the Secretary General of the Council did not attend the hearing organised on 27 November 2018 in the context of the annual discharge which again shows a complete lack of cooperation on the Council's side;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Underlines that, pursuant to the Treaties, Parliament is the only discharge authority of the Union, and that, in full acknowledgement of Council’s role as an institution giving recommendations in the discharge procedure, a distinction must be maintained in respect of the different roles of Parliament and Council in order to comply with the institutional framework laid down in the Treaties and in the Financial Regulation;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that Parliament submitted a Proposal for a cooperation procedure between both institutions on 9 November 2018; notes that the Council replied to Parliament’s proposal on the Council discharge exercise procedure on 2 May 2018 with an amended proposal, and that Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control sent its reaction to Council’s amended proposal on 21 July 2018; urges the Council to react to the latest proposals from the Budgetary Control Committee swiftly, so that the new arrangements for the discharge exercise can be applied as soon as possible;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls on the Council to speed up its procedure for the discharge recommendations, with the goal to enable discharge in year n+1; asks the Council to fulfil its particular role and to give discharge recommendations to the other Union institutions;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the Parliament's role in respect of the budget discharge is specified in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and in the Financial Regulation;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes with concerns the increase of EUR 16,5 million (+3 %) in the budget of the European Council and Council in 2017 compared to an increase of 0,6 % in 2016;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the information provided on the Council’s building strategy in the Final Financial Statements of 2017; notes that in July 2017, the Belgian State and the GSC concluded negotiations on the final price for the Europa building, agreeing on a final price of EUR 312 143 710,53, as well as on the acquisition of four additional plots of land surrounding Council’s buildings for an amount of EUR 4 672 944; notes that the final agreement is expected to be signed in 2018; notes that all amounts relating to the final settlement of the Europa building were paid or accrued in 2017;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the information provided on the Council’s building strategy in the Final Financial Statements of 2017; notes that in July 2017, the Belgian State and the GSC concluded negotiations on the final price for the Europa building as well as on the acquisition of four additional plots of land surrounding Council’s buildings; notes that the final agreement
source: 634.523
2020/01/20
CONT
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas all Union institutions
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets that the request to separate the budget of the European Council and the Council into one budget for the European Council and one budget for the Council, made by Parliament in previous discharge resolutions, has not been considered; insists on this separation which will contribute to better transparency in the financial management of both institutions and improve their accountability; deplores, further, its failure to give sufficient information on real estate policy;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets that the request to separate the budget of the European Council and the Council into one budget for the European Council and one budget for the Council, made by Parliament in previous discharge resolutions, has not been considered; insists on this separation which will contribute to transparency in the financial management of both institutions and improve their accountability and expenditure efficiency;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets that the request to separate the budget of the European Council and the Council into one budget for
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Acknowledges improvements in the Council's process of administrative modernisation, for example that internal rules for reporting serious irregularities are published on the Council’s website along with a guide to ethics and conduct for members of staff of the Council; calls on the Council to
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recalls that the Council agreed on the Commission proposal for a mandatory transparency register on 6 December 2017, but has still not implemented it;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recalls that the Council agreed on the Commission proposal for a mandatory transparency register on 6 December 2017, but has still not implemented it; calls on the Council to continue discussions on the technical aspects of the package of instruments regarding the Transparency Register, in order to achieve a political agreement between the three institutions as soon as possible, given that transparency in the European institutions will increase public confidence in the EU;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that Parliament backed the Ombudsman’s proposals in a plenary vote related to the Ombudsman's recommendations
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that Parliament backed the Ombudsman’s proposals in a plenary vote related to the Ombudsman's recommendations to the Council to allow
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Reiterates that
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Insists that an effective budgetary control exercise requires cooperation between Parliament and the Council with due respect for their respective roles; considers that satisfactory cooperation between both institutions in the form of an open and formal dialogue procedure would be a positive sign to send to the citizens of the Union;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas Parliament is the sole directly elected body among the Union institutions
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Expresses its concerns about the information reported by the European media regarding the corporate sponsorship of Member States hosting the Union Presidency and echoes the concerns expressed by European citizens and Members of the Parliament; acknowledges that the Member States are expected to finance their own Presidencies and that resorting to corporate sponsorship to cover some of its expenses has become common practice in recent years; is highly concerned about the possible reputational damage and the risk of loss of trust that this practice may incur on the Union, its institutions and especially to Council in the eyes of the European citizenship; suggests that Council adopt guidelines in order to promote the financial transparency and independency of the Presidencies; strongly recommends Council to envisage budgetisation of the Presidencies; will closely monitor the conclusions of the enquiry of the European Ombudsman related to this matter; requests Council to forward this concern to the Member States, in particular to the current trio Presidency;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the procedure of giving discharge separately to the individual Union institutions and bodies is a long- standing practice accepted by all the other institutions except the Council, and
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the Union institutions have administrative autonomy in matters relating to their respective operations; underlines the importance of them acting responsibly and professionally in the implementation of their budgets;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the role of Parliament within the discharge procedure, as governed by the Treaty and the Financial Regulation; a
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the Council again failed to provide answers to the written questions sent by Parliament and that the Secretary-General of the Council did not attend the hearing organised on 27 November 2018 in the context of the annual discharge procedure; further regrets that the Council also did not reply to the observations made by Parliament in its discharge resolution of 26 March 2019, thereby disregarding the role of the European Parliament;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls the difficulties repeatedly encountered in the discharge procedures to date due to the lack of cooperation from the Council and which
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the Council replied to the proposal of Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control on the Council discharge procedure on 2 May 2018 with an amended proposal, and that Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control sent its reaction to the Council’s amended proposal on 16 July 2018; urges the Council to react to the latest proposal swiftly so that the new arrangements for the discharge exercise can be applied as soon as possible;
source: 641.114
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/19 |
Old
New
|
committees/20 |
Old
New
|
committees/21 |
Old
New
|
committees/22 |
Old
New
|
committees/23 |
Old
New
|
committees/24 |
Old
New
|
committees/25 |
Old
New
|
committees/26 |
Old
New
|
committees/27 |
Old
New
|
committees/28 |
Old
New
|
committees/29 |
Old
New
|
committees/30 |
Old
New
|
committees/31 |
Old
New
|
committees/32 |
Old
New
|
committees/33 |
Old
New
|
committees/34 |
Old
New
|
committees/35 |
Old
New
|
committees/37 |
Old
New
|
committees/38 |
Old
New
|
committees/39 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2018-06-28T00:00:00New
2018-06-27T00:00:00 |
events/2/summary |
|
committees/0/shadows/4/group |
Old
Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green LeftNew
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL |
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE638.755New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-638755_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.114New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-641114_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190326&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2019-03-26-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20191022&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2019-10-22-TOC_EN.html |
events/9 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
events/11/summary |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/final |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE638.755
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE641.114
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A8-2019-0096&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0096_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0246New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0246_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A9-2019-0010&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2019-0010_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P9-TA-2019-0040New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2019-0040_EN.html |
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0096&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A8-2019-0096&language=EN |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0246New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0246 |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A9-2019-0010&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A9-2019-0010&language=EN |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P9-TA-2019-0040New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P9-TA-2019-0040 |
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/4 |
|
events/6/summary |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A9-2019-0010&language=EN
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A9-2019-0010&language=EN
|
docs/4 |
|
events/6/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
committees/16/opinion |
False
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
committees/19/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
committees/11/opinion |
False
|
committees/12/opinion |
False
|
committees/15/opinion |
False
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/20/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/8/opinion |
False
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/9/opinion |
False
|
committees/7/opinion |
False
|
committees/10/opinion |
False
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2/date |
|
committees/3/date |
|
committees/5/date |
|
committees/6/date |
|
committees/7/date |
|
committees/8/date |
|
committees/9/date |
|
committees/10/date |
|
committees/11/date |
|
committees/12/date |
|
committees/13/date |
|
committees/15/date |
|
committees/16/date |
|
committees/17/date |
|
committees/18/date |
|
committees/19/date |
|
committees/20/date |
|
committees/21/date |
|
committees/22/date |
|
committees/23/date |
|
committees/24/date |
|
committees/25/date |
|
committees/26/date |
|
committees/27/date |
|
committees/28/date |
|
committees/29/date |
|
committees/30/date |
|
committees/31/date |
|
committees/32/date |
|
committees/33/date |
|
committees/34/date |
|
committees/35/date |
|
committees/36/date |
|
committees/37/date |
|
committees/38/date |
|
committees/39/date |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/20 |
|
committees/21 |
|
committees/22 |
|
committees/23 |
|
committees/24 |
|
committees/25 |
|
committees/26 |
|
committees/27 |
|
committees/28 |
|
committees/29 |
|
committees/30 |
|
committees/31 |
|
committees/32 |
|
committees/33 |
|
committees/34 |
|
committees/35 |
|
committees/36 |
|
committees/37 |
|
committees/38 |
|
committees/39 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/14123New
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/14123
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/4/date |
2018-07-27T00:00:00
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|